T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
163.2 | You are correct. | DECWET::HELSEL | Well....isn't that special? | Tue Apr 26 1988 02:50 | 9 |
| Fra,
I apologize. The .270 is a great round.
Can I ask that while you are digging up your .270 data that you
also dig up that .308 data you promised back in 132. I'd
be interested in what you are shooting.
Brett.
|
163.3 | .270 | MTADMS::DAYOTTE | | Tue Apr 26 1988 16:42 | 8 |
| Fra,
I went to the cabinet just to double check.... and I couldn't
find a .270 Are you sure its "deer huntings all time favorite
caliber?????" 8^)
|
163.4 | GAWD-DAM METRICS | MTBLUE::SCHNEIDER_JA | | Fri Apr 29 1988 02:04 | 6 |
| .27555905 = 7mm
= FAVORITE AMMO
8-) = close but not .270
Jack
|
163.5 | .270 caliber questions | PVX::LEVESQUE | I fish, therefore I am | Tue Nov 15 1988 14:21 | 9 |
| I am thinking about getting a deer rifle. I kind of like the Browning
BAR in the .270 caliber. What can you tell me about the various
aspects of owning a gun like this?
I am interested in recoil (how does it compare to a 20 gauge shotgun),
accuracy, stopping power, and versatility. Also, how much will it
cost to shoot?
The Doctah
|
163.6 | | VLS4TW::LAFOSSE | | Thu Nov 17 1988 14:43 | 14 |
| I think the .270 is probably the best all around cartridge, it can
take down the biggest elk and is capable of taking chucks out to
400 yds consistently.
The Browning BAR is the finest auto loader available, but i think
for this type of gun the .308 would be a much better cartridge.
just for the simple rason that the cartridge is much shorter and
less inherent to jam...
there is virtually no recoil, and it is very accurate, but i would
go with the .308 for the autoloader.
good luck... fra
|
163.7 | There ain't no Elk in Vermont! | ATEAM::AYOTTE | | Wed Mar 22 1989 14:27 | 17 |
| Fra,
Do you know that your load of 48.5 grains of 4064 is .2 grains above
the maximum? Ref: Speer reloading manual numbers 10 and 11. I'm
in the process of working up a load for the same gun, and bullet.
I've started at 46 grains and have worked up in half grain increments
to a max of 48 (for starters). I'll be shooting this afternoon
and will use the data as a basis for fine tuning the load at .1
grain increments.
Your mention of accuracy with the sierra bullets is well appreciated.
Try weighing either Hornady or Nosler bullets and you'll quickly
find out that their quality standards are sub par to Sierra. Sierra
advertises .01 tolerance in bullet weight.
Looking forward to "driving some tacks". Keep you posted.
Dave
|
163.8 | | VLS4TW::LAFOSSE | | Thu Mar 23 1989 11:26 | 7 |
| Dave,
I checked last night, hornady reloading manual (3rd edition) list
the max load for the 130 grain pill to be 49.8 grains of 4064.
fra
|
163.9 | Magazine article on 270 loads | MAIL::HENSON | | Mon Jun 26 1989 17:20 | 20 |
|
For what it's worth, there's an article on loading for the
270 in the January, '86 issue of the American hunter. The
article contains a graphic which lists loads for several
different bullet weights (110, 130 and 150). If anyone
wants this information but doesn't have access to this
particular magazine, let me know in this notes file and I
will post it.
One other thing. I switched from a 130 gr. bullet to a
140 gr. bullet. Offhand, I can't remember the load (seems
like 53.5 gr of 4*** with Speer or Hornady BPSP). If anyone
is interested, I'll look it up and post that also. It seems
to work OK. I'm trying it as a compromise deer/elk load.
I don't shoot enough to be comfortable with changing loads
on a regular basis, so I favor using one and only one load
(I don't hunt varmints, so I don't need the 110 gr. loads).
Jerry
|
163.10 | 150 gr. load | CSC32::J_HENSON | What is 2 faced commit? | Mon Jul 15 1991 17:35 | 43 |
| I've been working up some new loads for my .270, and thought I'd
post the results. I will be hunting Mule Deer and Elk in Western
Colorado, so I decided to move up to the Speer Grand Slam bullet
in 150 gr. After carefully studying the ballistics charts, I've
come to the conclusion that at long ranges you don't really lose
much, velocity and trajectory wise, with the heavier bullet. And,
you have more knock-down power with the heavier bullet. With Elk,
you need all you can get. Anyway, here's what I've come up with, so
far.
I have two rifles. One is a Remington 700 BDL which I bought new about
15 years ago. The only modification I've made to it is to add a recoil
pad and a sling. I haven't done any accurizing on it at all. It's
my "old reliable" rifle.
The other rifle is a Savage 110E that I bought used about 2 years ago.
It hasn't been accurized in any way that I can tell. I use it for a
backup rifle and also let my 16 year old son use it.
With the Remington, I'm getting 1.5" 5-shot groups at 100 yds. with the
following load. That's about as good as I can shoot, so I think I'll
stick to this load. By the way, this is the max load recommended in
the Speer Reloading Manual, No. 11.
Bullet - Speer 150 gr. Grand Slam
Powder - 55.0 gr. IMR 4831
Muzzle Velocity - 2800+ fps (according to the manual)
With the Savage, I'm all over the paper with the above load. So far,
the best I've done with it is about a 3" 5-shot group at 100 yards.
Also, I just don't shoot it as well, and I got this group after firing
2 other 5-shot groups. I'm going to try it out of a cold barrel before
I decide if I will stay with it.
Bullet - Speer 150 gr. Grand Slam
Powder - 54.5 gr. IMR 4831
Muzzle Velocity = app. 2800 fps (according to the manual)
As a side note, the test barrel used by the Speer folks for M.V. measurements
was a Remington Model 700 with a 22" barrel, so I think that these
published figures ought to be pretty close for me.
Jerry
|
163.11 | Plinking loads, anyone? | CSC32::J_HENSON | What is 2 faced commit? | Tue Jul 16 1991 14:22 | 20 |
| Does anyone have any suggestions for light, plinking loads? I have
quite a few 130 and 140 grain bullets and some IMR 4350 powder. I'd
like to load these up lightly and use them as fun loads. You know,
something that will shoot ok but with mild recoil.
Here's what I have in the way of reloading supplies that I want to
burn up. I also have plenty of brass.
IMR 4350 powder
Hornady 130 gr. spire point bullet
Hornady 140 gr. spire point boat tail bullets
Rem. 9.5 and Federal 210 primers (I think this is right. They
are the standard large rifle primers).
I also have a little IMR 4831 powder that I've had around for several
years.
Thanks,
Jerry
|
163.12 | ex | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Tue Jul 16 1991 15:18 | 6 |
| what type of brass are you using, i have a couple of loads that i use
with hornady bullets... let me know, and i'll check tonight.
not using the 5350 powder though, i'm using 4064.
fra
|
163.13 | | CSC32::J_HENSON | What is 2 faced commit? | Tue Jul 16 1991 16:03 | 11 |
| >> <<< Note 163.12 by KNGBUD::LAFOSSE >>>
>> what type of brass are you using, i have a couple of loads that i use
>> with hornady bullets... let me know, and i'll check tonight.
I've got an assortment of brass. Some W-W, some R-P, and some other
stuff. That's part of the reason I want to load it light with not
a whole lot of regard to accuracy. For my hunting loads, I'm using
all new Winchester-Western brass.
Jerry
|
163.14 | | SA1794::CHARBONND | in disgrace with fortune | Tue Jul 16 1991 18:29 | 2 |
| In my 7-08 I use SR4759 for plinking. It's a special powder made
for light loads ONLY.
|
163.15 | 150 gr. load for my Savage 110 | CSC32::J_HENSON | What is 2 faced commit? | Fri Aug 16 1991 14:32 | 23 |
| I've finally settled on a load for my Savage 110. I'm not getting
the results I really wanted, but I'm running out of time and getting
reasonable results. With a 5 shot group, I'm getting about 3 within
an inch and the other two about another inch out. Not great, but
it seems to produce consistently, so I'll go with it. At least for
this year. Maybe next year I'll work up something better.
Anyway, here's the load.
Bullet - Speer 150 gr. Grand Slam
Powder - 52.5 gr. IMR 4831
Primers - Remington 9 1/2 large rifle primers
Brass - All new or once fired Winchester-Western
Muzzle Velocity - appl 2700+ fps (according to the manual)
Jerry
P.S. When you load for 2 different rifles of the same caliber but
different manufacturers, you really can see some differences.
I have discovered that I have to seat the 150 grain bullets
about 1/4 inch deeper for the Savage than I do for the
Remington.
|