T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
384.1 | | KERNEL::JOHNSONP | Certified sane....October 1993 | Wed Jan 10 1996 15:10 | 4 |
| I couldn't watch it, but I saw it advertised & found it quite
upsetting... they were trying to ban it from going out...
Paula
|
384.2 | | KERNEL::PLANTC | To tell you the truth, Not so much! | Wed Jan 10 1996 15:12 | 10 |
|
I had a neighbour in Canada that went to China a brought back a baby
girl. Alot of red tape but she was just so beautiful.
It's a shame that cultures put so little value on any life let alone
female.
Chris
|
384.3 | | CHEFS::TRAFFIC | Rez | Wed Jan 10 1996 15:44 | 34 |
| I agree with the last three.
It's a total disgrace and something must be done.
The "reasons" behind the dying rooms are as follows.
Due to the massive population explosion in China, families in China (in
certain areas) are only allowed to have one child. The preferred sex is
male as,
a/ Will carry families name forward to another generation.
b/ Has more chance of earning a decent living to support parents when
older. (Please don't call me sexist, this is the way it is in
China.)
In other areas of China, reason b/ applies and also the percentage
ratio of boys to girls (don't know what it is now though) used to be
something like 47% - 53% respectively.
On the news in England last night there was an item on Malcolm
Rifkind(sp?), the foreign secretary challenging his Chinese counterpart on
these allegations.
The Chinese minister contended that the documentary was all lies and
took Mr Rifkind on a tour of the orphanage.
The orpanage showed lots of colourful toys, happy children, smiling
nurses on no sign of the "dying rooms".(surprise, surprise.)
CHARLEY
|
384.4 | on = and. Sorry | CHEFS::TRAFFIC | Rez | Wed Jan 10 1996 15:45 | 1 |
|
|
384.5 | | WOTVAX::LEVERSEDGEM | Lancashire Lass | Wed Jan 10 1996 15:47 | 9 |
|
I watched the programme and cried buckets... it really upset me I have
the picture in my mind of the little girl the reporters found in a room
where shhe had been left to die 10 days previously.. I cant get that
picture out of my mind.....
Shelley
|
384.6 | | KERNEL::PLANTC | To tell you the truth, Not so much! | Wed Jan 10 1996 17:48 | 6 |
|
I didn't watch the show because I knew it would disturb me alot.
Chris
|
384.7 | | KERNEL::JOHNSONP | Certified sane....October 1993 | Wed Jan 10 1996 17:53 | 3 |
| Yeah that's why I did not watch it..
Paula
|
384.8 | | MPGS::REITH | Jim (MPGS::) Reith - DTN 237-3045 SHR3-1/U32 | Wed Jan 10 1996 18:42 | 7 |
| One of my buddies here (who just left the group to go back contracting) is
going through this process. They've had to provide the goverments with TONS of
documentation and been interviewed and will hopefully go over to China in April
to get a child. He's mentioned that there's 2-3000 babies brought back into the
US under this program but obviously this isn't making a dent in this issue.
Jim
|
384.9 | | KERNEL::WRIGHTD | | Wed Jan 10 1996 18:43 | 5 |
| I find things like child abuse very distressing.......and sad..
Is abuse a strong enough word though?
D.
|
384.10 | | NETCAD::DREYER | More great memories | Wed Jan 10 1996 19:07 | 11 |
| Deb,
I don't think there are *any* words strong enough to describe this horror.
I was really turned off China's inhumanitarianism many years ago after
reading a few articles about mandatory abortions, even when the mother was
as far along in her pregnancy as 8 1/2 months. Shocking what they do to
control population. Why don't they just put birth control in the water supply?
Curtailing pregnancy would be a much better option than homicide, IMO.
Lola
|
384.11 | | WOTVAX::LEVERSEDGEM | Lancashire Lass | Wed Jan 10 1996 19:32 | 6 |
|
Lola.. there were some incidences of the enforced abortion on the
documentary show last night.. it really was horrific..
Shell
|
384.12 | | KERNEL::WRIGHTD | | Wed Jan 10 1996 19:33 | 6 |
| I really abhore things like that Shell, but Im glad I didnt see it - I
dont think I could have stomached it!!
luv
D.
|
384.13 | | NETCAD::DREYER | More great memories | Wed Jan 10 1996 19:34 | 3 |
| Disgusting Shell, disgusting.
Lola
|
384.14 | | WOTVAX::LEVERSEDGEM | Lancashire Lass | Wed Jan 10 1996 19:39 | 7 |
|
How do you do anything though.. it leaves you feeling very helpless...
Shell
|
384.15 | | MPGS::REITH | Jim (MPGS::) Reith - DTN 237-3045 SHR3-1/U32 | Wed Jan 10 1996 19:43 | 3 |
| Well, there are organizations here in the states that are helping people go
through the process of adoption. I suppose one method would be to support those
groups.
|
384.16 | | CHEFS::HOPE_T | | Thu Jan 11 1996 12:49 | 12 |
| I did not want to watch the program. But I considered that I should
watch. As it said in the program the Chinees are a very proud race. In
my view the knowledge that how ever many thousand people watched this
program and saw what is happening, was a very powerful tool. The
chinees goverment has "lost face". maybe if they loose enough face they
might change.
I felt that I would rather know and be aware than to hide and pretend
life is nice!!!!
Tracey
|
384.17 | some voice from China | BEJVC::DICKHU | | Thu Jan 11 1996 16:15 | 18 |
| As I am a Chinese and I am now living in Beijing, I
think I should say something. Everybody should bear this
fact in mind: China is now has a population of over 1.1
BILLION. And the population is fast booming. No doubt
that a very strict birth control is absolutely
necessary.
And since over 80% of the population is living in
countryside with little education, the family plan is
very difficult to be implemented. Some families will try
to get a boy at any cost, that is the main cause of some
of the tragedy. It is rarely happened in the relatively
developed cities.
Compared with the achievement, overall I think that
family plan is successful and right.
Dick
|
384.18 | | CHEFS::HOPE_T | | Thu Jan 11 1996 16:41 | 9 |
| One of the orphanages featured in "return to the dying rooms" was in
Beijing.
Everyone excepts that there is a need for population control, but not
at any cost.
tracey
|
384.19 | | KERNEL::WRIGHTD | | Thu Jan 11 1996 16:43 | 6 |
| I agree...........human life should have more value.
luv
D.
|
384.20 | | MKOTS3::STARBRIGHT | Serenity | Thu Jan 11 1996 16:54 | 6 |
| I do not agree with China's policies. I thought I should state that
first, the thing I really want to say is, instead of bitching and
moaning and saying how horrible it all is .... let's help develop some
"workable, affordable" solutions for the populuation problem in China.
Remember, it could happen here as easily. This is a human issue, not a
Chinese issue.
|
384.21 | | WOTVAX::LEVERSEDGEM | Lancashire Lass | Thu Jan 11 1996 17:13 | 11 |
|
Though I understand the need for "population control" I cannot condone
the systematic slaughter of innocent children and I would never agree to
any efforts to justify this action. There are programmes in force to
try and develop workable solutions to the problem but in the mean time
the Chinese government must stop what is going on in the orphanages.
Shelley
|
384.22 | | KERNEL::WRIGHTD | | Thu Jan 11 1996 17:16 | 7 |
| they wont stop it Shelley and I'll tell you why - cos it'll cost too
much money!!........that's what I mean......money is valued more than
human life!!!
luv
D.
|
384.23 | | MPGS::REITH | Jim (MPGS::) Reith - DTN 237-3045 SHR3-1/U32 | Thu Jan 11 1996 17:41 | 16 |
| Well, the quality of life of an overpopulated country is pretty poor and while
I don't condone the dying room policy, I'm not sure I like the option of
mandated sterilization either. I think that China is setting itself up for a
major problem in the next 20-30 years when the predominantly male population
comes of age. I think a social change that valued women as equals would help
reduce some of this but those changes aren't going to happen in a generation.
Ancient times had similar periods. Look to Sparta and see much of this going
on. The Vikings had some of it as well. This isn't a new problem, we've just
convinced ourselves that humans are more civilized than it (which I'm not sure
I agree with either)
Nope, until we can figure out a way for the people being born to have a quality
of life that allows them to go on living to maturity, dying rooms might go away
but then you end up with something like Bangladesh where the death is in the
slums. If the people outnumber the available food/services, death will take
it's toll.
|
384.24 | | JGO::GERRITSEN | | Thu Jan 11 1996 17:45 | 11 |
|
This is not only a problem in China. For example Afrika, it is
expected that the population is doubled in 30 years not speaking
of enough food etc.
People should be educated using the pill and condoms. This could also
save a lot of people from aids.
It's all politics and their believe, the curch doesn't support the use
of condoms, all this in '96, can't believe it.
Ray
|
384.25 | | CSLALL::BERGERON | | Thu Jan 11 1996 22:08 | 9 |
| Hello !
Hi ! Peeps (Thought I would give it a try)
SJB
|
384.26 | New noter | BEJVC::DICKHU | | Fri Jan 12 1996 07:17 | 15 |
| Hi,
I want to make one thing clear: I can't see any relations between the
dying rooms and Chinese birth control policy. The things like the
dying rooms may happen, but it is just a particular case that could
happen in any country, like murders or other kind of crimes that is
happening everywhere on the world.
Orphanages may not have as good condition as some rich countries, but
it is definitely not a place to murder children.
Dick
|
384.27 | | QCAV02::RAVISHANKAR | AboutTimeIChangedThis | Fri Jan 12 1996 07:42 | 14 |
|
We have female infanticide prevalent in India also... I think China
has done an excellent job of population control ( you'd have heard only
of the killings but they have implemented other methods such as less
benifits to families that have more than one child )... but look at us
Indians...we keep crying about increasing pouplation and educating
people in birth control but where has it got us ? well we're all set to
overtake China by 2010.... all because people believe that children (
male ) are a gift of god and ofcourse they will grow up and increase
the income of the family whereas females are a burden cause they go
away after they grow up and marry.....( I'm sorry but thats true... and
since as much as 75% or our pouplation is rural.. it compounds it )
Ravi.
|
384.28 | | WOTVAX::LEVERSEDGEM | Lancashire Lass | Fri Jan 12 1996 12:35 | 16 |
|
Re Dicks comments about murder/abuse going on worldwide.. although this
is very true the big difference is that in the main we dont condone
this.. people who commit outrages of this sort are punished not
promoted. I feel really strongly on this issue and so I hope I'm not
offending anyone by my views. If you watched the programme and saw the
chldren tied to chairs and starved both of nutrients and affection I
cant see how you could possibly condone it unless you have no emotions
at all. I would feel the same on this issue wherever in the worl it
occured and I'm just as incensed by child abuse in this country.
Shelley
|
384.29 | Get me out of here... | NETCAD::DREYER | More great memories | Fri Jan 12 1996 19:16 | 17 |
| My sentiments are the same as yours, Shelley. Dick, the way
population control ties into it is that it is much more humane to
prevent a life before it happens than to abuse and murder that life
after it has come into the world. I can't condone the killing of
children, but why does it have to be done in such a tortureous
manner if it is inevitably going to happen? Can't they just give the
victim an injection and mercifully end the life instead of starving
it to death? Not that I at all condone this either.
Ravi, I think it's a da*n shame that one sex is valued more highly
than the other, and I know this happens in many cultures. I'm glad
I don't live in such a culture. Hopefully one day the world will
realize that all humans are created equally and should be treated
with dignity and respect regardless of race, sex, religion, sexual
preference or national origin.
Lola
|
384.30 | | MPGS::REITH | Jim (MPGS::) Reith - DTN 237-3045 SHR3-1/U32 | Fri Jan 12 1996 19:18 | 1 |
| Yeah, what Lola said.
|
384.31 | America is great...but it is no paradise! | POOKY::OROURKE | confectionary_celebrity | Fri Jan 12 1996 19:45 | 16 |
|
Lola,
No offense meant...but in the spirit of debate.
I do NOT agree with your statement that you don't live in a culture
that values one sex over another. I'm not a raging feminist but all
you have to do is look at the statistics.
Who makes more money for the same work?
Which sex is more likely to live below the poverty line?
Which 'crime' is taken more seriously?
I could go on and on.
/jen
|
384.32 | | KERNEL::WRIGHTD | | Fri Jan 12 1996 19:48 | 8 |
| No, Scott, I aint busy
luv
D
x
|
384.33 | | NETCAD::DREYER | More great memories | Fri Jan 12 1996 19:53 | 11 |
| /jen,
I'm sure you could go on and on, and I'm sure many of the points would be valid.
However, this country is trying to promote equality of the sexes. That's
why we have all these sexual discrimination laws now. I personally make the
same as men in my field, my group has more female managers than male,
women can get quality education here and I could go on and on. I'm not saying
there is no sexual discrimination in this country but I do not feel that a
male child is valued over a female one.
Lola
|
384.34 | | POOKY::OROURKE | confectionary_celebrity | Fri Jan 12 1996 20:21 | 30 |
|
Ah..just continuing on the lively conversation.
Many of may be 'trying to promote equality of the sexes' but we have a
long way to go. You may make as much as men in your field but by the
statistics, that puts you in the minority. And it may be because you
work for Digital which is considered a pretty progressive company.
Yet, even here it is evident. Last year I was 'privileged' enough to
attend a meeting with Bob Palmer. It was Bob and all his Business Unit
VP's and all their Controllers around a big mahogany table with us
'little people' up against the wall. Guess what...EVERY person at that
table was a white male over 40!
And you mention sexual discrimination law suits almost as if they are a
'positive' sign. It is good that something is being done to attempt to
right wrongs, but if our society in total truely valued both sexes
equally, you wouldn't have a need for the lawsuits.
We've got work to do in education - studies still show that males are
called on more than females, and females are still discouraged from
persuing technical education (i.e. maths and sciences). Also, in
areas of medicine it has been shown that very little money is allocated
to diseases that traditionally only affect women.
Like I said...America is a wonderful place and we enjoy many luxuries
and benefits but we still have much dissension in our ranks. If our
government were to suddenly impose a one-child mandate like China, I
wouldn't want to hazard a guess what behaviour we'd see here!
/jen
|
384.35 | | NETCAD::DREYER | More great memories | Fri Jan 12 1996 20:34 | 50 |
| Yes /jen, we do have a long way to go, but we also have come a long way and
that's working in the right direction. I agree there is alot of sexual
discrimination still in this country, but we have it FAR better than in
countries such as India or China, which was my point.
I realize the majority of corporate america is made up of white males.
Maybe I've always been lucky, making as much as the males in my field...
even when I was in sheetmetal, one of three women out of a union of 600.
Believe me, I know what discrimination is.
> And you mention sexual discrimination law suits almost as if they are a
> 'positive' sign. It is good that something is being done to attempt to
> right wrongs, but if our society in total truely valued both sexes
> equally, you wouldn't have a need for the lawsuits.
I did NOT mention *anything* about LAWSUITS!!! I said "laws" , which are a good
thing...especially when the purpose of such laws is to try to help a society
evolve.
> We've got work to do in education - studies still show that males are
> called on more than females, and females are still discouraged from
> persuing technical education (i.e. maths and sciences). Also, in
> areas of medicine it has been shown that very little money is allocated
> to diseases that traditionally only affect women.
Well, studies can be skewed and figures can be twisted. I know in the schools
I went to women were encouraged as much as men were, to take pre college
courses and to concentrate in science and math. I was in advanced math classes
from 6 grade on, and we had a nearly equal number of both sexes. I can
only speak from personal experience.
> Like I said...America is a wonderful place and we enjoy many luxuries
> and benefits but we still have much dissension in our ranks. If our
I agree with this.
> government were to suddenly impose a one-child mandate like China, I
> wouldn't want to hazard a guess what behaviour we'd see here!
Couldn't even speculate. I don't really think you understood the point that I
was trying to make at all /jen. I was not saying there is no sexual
discrimination here... My point was that I'm happy to be here than in a
country where it is so obviously blatant. It you really want to debate
this issue, Womannotes is a more appropriate place...
Lola
|
384.36 | | MPGS::REITH | Jim (MPGS::) Reith - DTN 237-3045 SHR3-1/U32 | Fri Jan 12 1996 21:37 | 21 |
| But back to the topic at hand...
You don't see any extremes being taken to prefer one sex over the other. With
a birthrate of 2.4 children per family, we won't be in China's situation for
a while. Our sex distribution is still pretty close to 50/50, not the 47/53
claimed in the original text. We aren't exporting our children on a single
sex basis like the Chinese girls my friend is adopting. We've gotten away
from the old mentality were children are family laborers and more is better.
I think if we can limit the population growth (or keep it low like it
currently is) we won't be put in the position of China to need the mandates.
I know when Rose and I started our family, we were looking for a boy and then
a girl, which we got, but I don't think we would have kept trying until a boy
was born (or a girl if they were all boys). I also don't see any real benefit
to which sex the children are. To be honest, I expect my middle daughter to
go significantly farther due to her brains, more than her plumbing.
Nope, the point was that there isn't any infantcide happening in america at
the present time and there is in other nations. that's a hurtle that needs to
be jumped before we worry about who's sitting on mahogany row.
Jim
|
384.37 | | POOKY::OROURKE | confectionary_celebrity | Fri Jan 12 1996 21:44 | 19 |
|
I know...and I'll drop it soon.
But we do have our own form of infanticide (and no I don't think it
favors one gender over the other).
All you have to do is look at the number of children in American that
are living or should I say DYING in poverty. In our land of plenty
this is a sin. Go to the rural areas of Mississippi...go to the
Bronx. It looks a lot like the worst third-world country conditions
you can imagine.
We have a lot to work on to improve the average living conditions here.
It's gonna take a lot of education, medical availability and job
infrastructure.
Pretty overwhelming!
/jen
|
384.38 | | NETCAD::DREYER | More great memories | Fri Jan 12 1996 21:52 | 10 |
|
Unfortunately what you say is true, /jen and it's a crying shame. We have
more than enough resources to feed our own starving and still have leftover
food. Warehouses full of rotting food, farmers getting paid NOT to grow crops.
It doesn't make any sense to me at all.
Lola
|
384.39 | | MPGS::REITH | Jim (MPGS::) Reith - DTN 237-3045 SHR3-1/U32 | Fri Jan 12 1996 21:55 | 4 |
| But these are hurtles we are standing at because we've gotten beyond the
others. You don't have to worry about a starving youngster if you're trying
to kill off the infants. These are all problems yet to become number one in
these other countries
|
384.40 | | NETCAD::DREYER | More great memories | Fri Jan 12 1996 22:06 | 1 |
| So what does that make us?
|
384.41 | | MPGS::REITH | Jim (MPGS::) Reith - DTN 237-3045 SHR3-1/U32 | Fri Jan 12 1996 22:14 | 1 |
| Further along the road and, hopefully, continuing to make progress.
|
384.42 | | POOKY::OROURKE | confectionary_celebrity | Fri Jan 12 1996 22:15 | 6 |
|
But it still comes down to personal responsibility. DO NOT bring a
child into the world if you're not prepared and capable of caring for
them.
/jen
|
384.43 | | MPGS::REITH | Jim (MPGS::) Reith - DTN 237-3045 SHR3-1/U32 | Fri Jan 12 1996 22:18 | 7 |
| Which isn't the same as the initial sexual preferences reasons that started
this.
A child WAS wanted. It was to be a MALE child though...
We have overcome that stumbling block and I think we're getting better on the
personal responsibility front.
|
384.44 | | NETCAD::DREYER | More great memories | Fri Jan 12 1996 23:07 | 7 |
| /jen,
How about adding to that...DO NOT bring a child into this world if
you're not fully prepared and capable of taking care of *yourself*
and that child???
Lola
|
384.45 | | MPGS::REITH | Jim (MPGS::) Reith - DTN 237-3045 SHR3-1/U32 | Sat Jan 13 1996 14:53 | 7 |
| Well, after channel surfing this morning I happened to stop on Cinemax
long enough to see that their Vandgard Cinema on Wednesday January 24th
is this piece on the Dying Rooms. The preview images were pretty
disturbing. So, it any of the US readers want a look for yourself, tune
into Cinemax on the evening of the 24th.
Jim
|
384.46 | More questions... | POOKY::OROURKE | like the desert misses the rain | Tue Jan 16 1996 21:53 | 21 |
|
Joyce,
I found it interesting that the NZ government will not allow single
people to adopt. I assume when you say this you mean neither single
men or woman? They may receive more scrutiny here in the US but
adoptions by single parents are allowed.
Could you tell us more about China's culture....maybe it would help
shed light on this. For example is reproductive education the norm?
Is artificial birth control readily available and affordable and
understood by the average person (both in urban and rural areas?)?
Under what circumstances are abortions allowed? Besides the laws
what are the cultural taboos? Are women granted paid maternity
leave?
For those of you that have already seen the program, did it address
issues like this?
/jen
|
384.47 | | NETCAD::DREYER | More great memories | Tue Jan 16 1996 23:36 | 12 |
| /jen,
What is "artificial" birth control?
Lola
|
384.48 | | MPGS::REITH | Jim (MPGS::) Reith - DTN 237-3045 SHR3-1/U32 | Tue Jan 16 1996 23:45 | 2 |
| Contraception instead of rhythm or abstinance (sorry if it's misspelled. It's
not part of my normal vocabulary)
|
384.49 | | NETCAD::DREYER | More great memories | Tue Jan 16 1996 23:55 | 7 |
| Silly me , I took the meaning to be something not real instead of something
man-made. Wouldn't make much sense that wya :-)))
Yeah, yeah...we know abstinence is foreign to you!!
Lola
|
384.50 | Ok, I've cooled off now :) | NZOV02::TANJOYCE | | Wed Jan 17 1996 00:35 | 20 |
| Hi /jen,
you're asking for a lot of info. there ma'am! :) It's actually
pretty crude and simple in China; to cut a long story short, there is
*forced* sterilisation in China. There is birth control, freely
available. There is a one child policy. Chinese people are (God
help us) ignorantly sexist. It's not that human life isn't valued,
but female life that isn't valued. A male child carries your family
name, thus your lineage. So if you give birth to a daughter, you
make her disappear; chance for another child.
Lola, sorry you didn't get a chance to read my note Sweetie :) I
must admit, I entered it in a fit of angst and was told (quite rightly)
to get off my moral high horse. You see, I've been trying to adopt
a baby girl from China. Hell, I'd adopt 10 baby girls from China, if
they'd let me! So anyone wanna marry me so I can have babies?? :)
Catch you later,
Joyce
|
384.51 | | QCAV02::RAVISHANKAR | AboutTimeIChangedThis | Wed Jan 17 1996 07:15 | 13 |
|
Laura, Sorry for this late reply but we're trying to get people to
recoganise the fact that a child (male/female) has the same
opertunities available. This point is being driven home lately with the
fact that the job sector is opening up to and being filled with more
girls and they are doing a very commendable job. It'll take some time
for this to trickle into the rural sections but get there it will...
*8) and Sex Education is a taboo subject here simply beacuse the
parents fear that the kids will end up learning more that their parents
know and thus will be a threat to their authority ( I know it sounds
stupid but thats the way it stands )
Ravi.
|
384.52 | | NETCAD::DREYER | More great memories | Wed Jan 17 1996 16:16 | 7 |
| Joyce...good luck, I hope you can manage to adopt...can you just marry
a friend, adopt and then annul the marraige?? :-)))
Ravi, I'm flad to hear the doors are beginning to open up for females
there. That's the first step!
Lola
|
384.53 | | SUBPAC::SADIN | Freedom isn't free. | Sun Jan 21 1996 23:49 | 65 |
|
01/19/96 - 06:02 PM ET -
Chinese admit to detention
BEIJING - The government admitted Friday that it had
detained the brother of the woman who provided most of the
information for a dramatic report on deliberate starvation in
orphanages.
But China said the man was released after just one day in
custody, while Human Rights Watch, the agency that issued the
report, said he had been held three days, released and then
detained again.
The report, which told of orphanage officials denying children
food and medicine in order to keep orphanage populations down,
received wide attention outside China and angered the
government, which is sensitive to criticism of its policies and
human-rights record.
Most of the information in the report came from Zhang
Shuyun, a former doctor in a Shanghai orphanage who now
lives in the United States.
On Jan. 9, two days after the report was issued, her brother
Zhang Jian was taken from his home in Shanghai, Foreign
Ministry spokesman Yuan Xiaoyin said Friday. Zhang Jian had
been trying to leave the country illegally, Yuan said.
Yuan said Zhang Jian was released the same day, but Human
Rights Watch official Mickey Spiegel in New York said he
spent three days in custody without food and medication he
needs. Spiegel said Zhang Jian was detained again on Tuesday.
It was unclear whether he has since been released.
His sister said by telephone from New York on Thursday that
she discovered her brother's detention last week when she tried
to contact her family. She said she was reluctant to call again,
fearing that she might further endanger her family.
Zhang Jian's family was notified Monday that he was accused
of subverting the government, his sister said. The charge carries
a minimum sentence of 10 years in prison and could result in
the death penalty.
She said the government also confiscated cash and jewelry she
left behind to help cover costs of medical care for her parents,
when she left China last year.
Officials had refused to confirm or deny any of her assertions
until Friday's statement about Zhang Jian's detention.
The government accuses the report of doctoring or staging
photos showing emaciated, dying children tied to cots.
Shortly after its release, China's Foreign Ministry and the
Shanghai government took foreign journalists on a tour of the
Shanghai facility, which since 1993 has improved and become a
main source of children for foreign adoptions.
By The Associated Press
|
384.54 | what can we do | WOTVAX::NEARYM | wigan_lad | Thu Feb 01 1996 17:26 | 25 |
| Hi
I've just been reading this note, what can you say its painfull,
of course the pain comes from them being children, I was working
in Liverpool the other night, as I drove home in the snow I saw
a tramp walking down the expressway looking for somewhere to sleep
this to is painful, there is next to nothing you can do about the
internal goings on in china, but how many of you have stopped and
given a tramp a fiver lately, by this I'm not trying to imply a
thing, but when it all boils down to it you can talk about things
till your blue in the face, unless you can do something about what's
the point, the thing that gets to me is when you see something
in the paper about a member of our royal (ha ha ha) family who
is complaining she's broke and runs up a 3 million debt, I wish
there was somewhere in China I could send her.
I think you must all be
very caring people who wrote in this note and its an pleasure to
work with all.
regards
Mike.
|
384.55 | | MKOTS3::STARBRIGHT | Serenity | Thu Feb 01 1996 19:05 | 5 |
| Welcome to FRIENDS, Mike ... and thank you for sharing with us. I hope
we will be seeing alot more from you from now on.
Serenity
|
384.56 | thanks | WOTVAX::NEARYM | wigan_lad | Fri Feb 02 1996 14:48 | 9 |
| Hi Serenity,
Thank you for your kind words, this is the very best conference to read
and write in to, one day maybe if we are very lucky all the people in
it may meet.
hugs
Mike.
|
384.57 | | CHEFS::HOPE_T | | Wed Mar 13 1996 18:20 | 4 |
| AHH! but some of them already have,
Tracey
(remember stoke!!)
|