[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::fddi

Title:FDDI - The Next Generation
Moderator:NETCAD::STEFANI
Created:Thu Apr 27 1989
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2259
Total number of notes:8590

692.0. "Single FDDI station to DECbridge 500?" by KAAKAA::SEPPI () Thu Sep 03 1992 19:08

    I'm trying to configure a poor man's FDDI.  What I'm proposing appears
    to be a legal configuration according to the NACBG.  It is as follows:
    
        |---------|					^
    	|  VAX	  |			|-----------|	|
    	| 7000 w/ |			| DECbridge |	|
    	|	  |	 BNE24B-XX	|	    |	|
    	|  DEMFA  |_____________________|   520     |___|
    	|_________|	   FDDI		|___________|	| e-net
    							|
    							|
    							V
    
    The idea is to create a high speed funnel into the VAX. 
    NOTE: the absence of a concentrator.  I know the FDDI controller 400
    is a SAS device, but we're trying to simplify our config for $ sake.
    
    The customer is convinced that this is what he wants.  Is this
    a legal FDDI configuration.  Should we strongly recommend against this?
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
692.1Perfectly legalDECEAT::KALKUNTERamsesh Kalkunte 293-5139Thu Sep 03 1992 20:251
    Concentrators help only if you have more than 2 FDDI nodes on the ring.
692.2Legal? Yes, but does it add value?BAGELS::LEVYThu Sep 03 1992 21:043
   > The idea is to create a high speed funnel into the VAX. 
    
    The throughput of this configuration is no better than using a DEMNA.
692.3Consider a DECbridge 6xx ?LARVAE::HARVEYBaldly going into the unknown...Fri Sep 04 1992 08:095
    Re: -1. I agree - but if you were to use a multiport bridge and separate 
    your ethernet devices over the multiple (3) segments you may begin to see 
    performace/throughput enhancements....
  
    Rog
692.4KONING::KONINGPaul Koning, A-13683Fri Sep 04 1992 16:206
As has been said here several times before, that configuration is legal, valid,
and supported.  In the past there has been some confusion on this and some
claims that it should be discouraged, but that is incorrect and I hope this
misunderstanding is fading away.

	paul