[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::dcu

Title:DCU
Notice:1996 BoD Election results in 1004
Moderator:CPEEDY::BRADLEY
Created:Sat Feb 07 1987
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1041
Total number of notes:18759

602.0. "Social Security Number Identifier?" by CSC32::K_KINNEY () Mon Sep 14 1992 22:41

    
    
    	I have a question on the way employees are being
    	validated for telephone transactions. When I phone
    	in to do any kind of transfer and I need to speak
    	with a teller (going between joint accounts under
    	separate badge numbers cannot happen using DECTALK)
    	I used to be asked for my hire date. Now they want
    	my social security number. I generally refuse to 
    	give that to anyone but my accountant. It theoretically
    	is not to be used for identification. At least, that
    	is what the Social Security card I have says on it.
    	Does this mean if I start refusing to give it to
    	the teller, I can no longer transfer funds by phone?
    	
    						kim
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
602.1Offer an alternativeSAINT::STCLAIRTue Sep 15 1992 13:1812
The teller has your SS number ('cause banks need it for IRS). They are asking
you to give it to them to compare to the information on the screen. But
in keeping with the privacy issue why not explain your reticence (sp?) and
ask them for some other question you would be willing to answer. They
use my mothers maiden name in some places for example when challenged.

As a side light the Emerson Hospital here in Concord wanted it. I said no
they said the insurance (John Hancock)  required it. I check JH said no
I went back and they gave me a new number that we made up.

/doug
602.2SS number IS NOT I SAY IS NOT an identifierSMAUG::GARRODFloating on a wooden DECk chairTue Sep 15 1992 13:4117
    Re .0
    
    This is a pet peeve of mine as well. I categorically refuse to give out
    my SS number unless I'm legally obligated to.
    
    For reasons why take a look at a recent note I entered in DIGITAL.NOTE
    whereby if you know somebody's social security number and a few other
    things (that are dead easy to find out) you can find out how much they
    earn.
    
    I'll have to try this DCU line. If I get asked for my SS number I
    intend to issue an official complaint to DCU.
    
    Re .1. Yes i too went through the same crap with an HMO. I finally
    managed to get a special id number.
    
    Dave
602.3PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 15 1992 14:495
    Whose privacy is being violated by a request for an SSN when the teller
    already has it on a screen in front of them?  Because the SSN is used
    by the IRS, banks and credit unions need to have that information.
    
    Would you rather the phone teller just took your word that you are you?
602.4No trust meCSC32::K_KINNEYTue Sep 15 1992 15:036
    
    
    	No, I would not rather the phone teller just "trust me".
    	I didn't have any problems with giving my hire date.
    	I do have major problems giving my social security number.
    
602.5my thought on this is...LEDS::SIMARDjust in time.....Tue Sep 15 1992 15:2713
    I have problems giving my SS # to people who want to write it on checks
    that I am using for payments but not with the credit union who has to
    have it to process my IRS statements or that I already know has it on
    the screen in front of them.  I figure since I am the one instigating the
    phone call it's ok.
    
    One time I had given it to DCU over the phone and they found they had
    an error in their system on the number.  Of course it was corrected
    immediately.
    
    
    
    
602.6WLDBIL::KILGOREBill -- 227-4319Tue Sep 15 1992 15:3014
    
    I think we should all try to differentiate between those cases where
    people who don't have or need you SS number are asking for it, and
    cases where people who already have it are using it to confirm your
    ID.
    
    As pointed out, by law banks need and have your SS number. In fact, if
    you guard this number as carefully as you should, it is probably the
    best information they have on hand to verify that you are you. Hire
    dates are trivial to obtain.
    
    This situation is a far cry from, for example, a store using your SS
    number for further ID on a check.
    
602.7ALPH1::BISSELLTue Sep 15 1992 15:384
How would the DCU have access to your hire date ?  
Unless of course someone in Digital gave them access to the personnel master
file and what relation does hire date have to people who derive membership 
rights from a Digital employee ?
602.8They asked...QUINCE::MADDENPat MaddenTue Sep 15 1992 15:421
    DCU asked me for my hire date when I opened my account.
602.9PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 15 1992 16:213
602.10The key point to all thisERLANG::MILLEVILLETue Sep 15 1992 16:277
The key point in all this is the DCU teller ALREADY HAS the (supposedly) cor-
rect SS # on the screen.  So you are NOT giving out information they don't
already know.

Those of you who are concerned about this need only worry when the person who
says they need to know the number DON'T ALREADY have it, or you have strong
reason to believe they don't.
602.11What is the policy?CSC32::K_KINNEYTue Sep 15 1992 17:277
    
    
    	It may be so that the teller already has it. I guess
    	the original question is, if I (for whatever reason)
    	do not choose to permit this to be used for identification,
    	do I still get the transaction made or not?
    
602.12PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 15 1992 17:4113
602.13question authorityXLIB::SCHAFERMark Schafer, ISV Tech. SupportTue Sep 15 1992 18:484
    For TAX PURPOSES, yes, they have the info.  The point that is being
    made is that they are  using it for purposes that are not intended. 
    Is that ethical?  NO!, but it is so effective that businesses will
    continue to use it as long as we let them get away with it.
602.14What IS the policy?CSC32::K_KINNEYTue Sep 15 1992 19:198
    
    
    	referencing .12
    
    	Are you then in a position of authority with the DCU
    	such that you are stating DCU policy? Meaning, no ident
    	via ssn, no transaction?
    
602.15PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 15 1992 19:206
602.16PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 15 1992 19:228
602.17Still looking for the answerCSC32::K_KINNEYTue Sep 15 1992 19:2816
    
    
    	Allow me to quote what it says at the bottom of my
    	Social Security card:
    
    	FOR SOCIAL SECURITY AND TAX PURPOSES-NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION
    
    	I do not use this number to identify myself to the automatic
    	teller. I categorically refuse to fill that number in on forms
    	that have nothing to do with taxes.  I realize the credit union
    	has the number for tax purposes. I have no disagreement with their
    	use of this number for tax purposes. 
    	Still looking for policy on this. Can a phone transaction be
    	done without using the SSN as identification? Guess I am just
    	going to have to test it. Hope the teller knows.
    
602.18SSN is *NOT* neededCSC32::K_KINNEYTue Sep 15 1992 19:358
    
    
    	Ok, end of question. I just phoned the 800 number
    	to do some transactions and after informing the 
    	teller I didn't care to ident using my SSN, I was
    	asked for my address and date of hire. Those are
    	no problem (to me anyway).
    
602.19Yes, it's unethical, and illegalFDCV14::DOTENstay hungryTue Sep 15 1992 19:3627
602.2011SRUS::MARKWaltzing with BearsTue Sep 15 1992 20:5212
602.21ssan is not unique for allRANGER::BRADLEYChuck BradleyTue Sep 15 1992 21:4710
for those of you who do not mind your ssan being used as an idenfifier,
be warned that it is not an effective identifier.  in a prior life i was
an applications programmer for a mid-sized oil company. we had a string
of programs we had to run at least once per year to change social security
numbers that were discovered to be duplicates. occasionally, an employee
used the wrong number, or a clerk made a mistake in transcription,
but the most common cause was the social security administration had
issued the same number to more than one person.
we encountered about three or four cases per year for about 20,000 employees,
if memory serves me right. this was in 1960-62.
602.22ID vs. verifying IDERLANG::MILLEVILLEWed Sep 16 1992 11:1710
.17> Allow me to quote what it says at the bottom of my
.17> Social Security card:

.17> FOR SOCIAL SECURITY AND TAX PURPOSES-NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION

Question - are 'identification' and 'verification OF identification'
the same thing?  My impression is they are not.  The first case, the
person being presented with your SS # doesn't know the #.  The second,
they do.  If this assumption is correct, then the statement on your SS
card does not apply to merely VERIFYING your identity.
602.23Authentication <> IdentificationNAC::KINDELBill Kindel @ LKG1Wed Sep 16 1992 14:2026
602.24Very slight semanticsFDCV14::DOTENstay hungryWed Sep 16 1992 14:388
    Yes, it's bogus to think that only you know your SSN. Especially when
    every DEFCU teller has the information at their finger tips! :-)
    
    Seems to me that the statment on the SSN card saying "not for
    identification" includes not for verification purposes. What else would
    it mean?
    
    -Glenn-
602.25Who could change the process?CSC32::K_KINNEYWed Sep 16 1992 15:034
    
    
    	So, how to register a formal objection with DCU?
    
602.26PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Sep 16 1992 15:3413
602.27Sensitive info should be treated as suchFDCV14::DOTENstay hungryWed Sep 16 1992 15:5113
    "Verification purposes" means to me identifying who you are.
    
    Perhaps unethical is not the word. My point is that the SSN should be
    "secret"; no one should know it unless they have an absolutely
    essential reason for knowing it. DEFCU tellers do not have a reason to
    know your SSN, and their job should not require them to have access to
    the information.
    
    The unethical part comes in when a teller decides to use your SSN in a
    bad way. If they don't have access to the information then we don't
    have to worry about that, do we?
    
    -Glenn-
602.28CVG::THOMPSONRadical CentralistWed Sep 16 1992 16:377
>    	So, how to register a formal objection with DCU?

	I'd send a letter to the President of the DCU. He's in charge of
	operations. I might CC the BoD but that is optional as it's not
	really a policy issue so much as operational.

			Alfred
602.29thanksCSC32::K_KINNEYWed Sep 16 1992 17:258
    
    
    	re: .28
    
    	Thank you. Figured it was an OPS issue. Wasn't sure whether
    	just to get the name/address of the operations mgr or if
    	there was some other person to ship it to.
    
602.30Another tackNAC::KINDELBill Kindel @ LKG1Wed Sep 16 1992 18:109
    Re .25:
    
>   So, how to register a formal objection with DCU?
    
    I think it would be more to the point to convince DCU that the SSAN
    isn't secret enough to prevent merchants and such from calling up and
    impersonating you to make telephone transactions or obtain balances. 
    If they start seeing $$$ at the prospect of absorbing any losses due to
    such fraud, they're more likely to respond.
602.31loss of privacy and securityRGB::SEILERLarry SeilerWed Sep 16 1992 19:0335
This is one example of a (regretably) much more general problem:  numbers
that are fairly widely available and that can be used to impersonate people
or find out private information about them.  For example:

	SS number:  it's all you need to get someone's credit record etc.
		It is printed on most driver's licenses in Massachusetts.

	Digital badge number:  this is used to validate all sorts of 
		things, including requests for changes to ELF.  It's
		printed on a card we're all supposed to wear publicly.

	Credit Card number:  Given the number, your name and a credit slip
		anyone can make charges against your account.  The number
		is very hard to keep private.  At least in this case the
		law makes the credit company liable for any fraud --
		provided that you notice it in time!

Now, some would argue that since there are lots of examples of problems 
with the way ID numbers are used, it therefore doesn't matter what is done
with social security numbers.  I take the opposite tack:  try to solve the 
problem in each case where it occurs.  There are two types of solutions:

	Don't let the number be used for authentication.  E.g., how'd you 
	feel if everyone's computer passwords were changed to their badge 
	numbers?  It's obvious this isn't much security.  Using SS numbers
	to validate banking-by-phone transactions is safer, but not enough.

	Require that the number be kept more private.  E.g., the tellers 
	need to see our account balances to do their jobs.  But they don't
	need to see our SS numbers to do their jobs -- so object to their 
	having access to that information.  


		Enjoy,
		Larry
602.32FDCV14::DOTENstay hungryWed Sep 16 1992 19:5813
>	SS number:  it's all you need to get someone's credit record etc.
>		It is printed on most driver's licenses in Massachusetts.
    
    Unless something has changed in the last 8 years all Mass drivers
    licenses have the SSN on them since the drivers license number *is*
    the SSN. I'd like to see someone try and get Mass to change that!
    
    I like how it is up here in NH - when your license comes up for renewal
    you check a box indicating if you want your SSN on the license or not.
    The drivers license number is a whole different number. Of course, my
    SSN field is blank on my drivers license.
    
    -Glenn-
602.33re:.32SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Sep 16 1992 20:063
       You can ask the Registry of Motor Vehicles clerk for a number other
    than your SSN and you will get one. It's been that way for years.
                                 Denny
602.34Guess they keep it a pretty good secret though!FDCV14::DOTENstay hungryWed Sep 16 1992 20:464
    Wellll. Learn something new every day. I spent my first 25 years in
    Mass and never knew that!
    
    -Glenn-
602.35Not Mandatory, by Law, but....NETCAD::TARBETWed Sep 16 1992 21:4712
    RE: SSAN & Accounts
    As I recall, the IRS does not require you to list your SSAN on
    accounts. There is a catch, that being that the institution is required
    to withhold "X"% of interest on unidentified accounts. That is to
    insure that interest does get paid.
    
    The withholding rate was something like 20%, but I wouldn't bet the
    farm on it.
    
    The issue with the SSAN is the Rights to Privacy, as addressed in the
    question of requiring a national identification card. Universal use of
    the SSAN would erode that protection. 
602.36I went through all of this 2 years ago in NH...EDWIN::WAYLAY::GORDONMalice AforethoughtWed Sep 16 1992 22:425
	Actually, I believe the box on the NH form is to remove the SSN from
your NH motor vehicle records entirely.  They claim they need it initially
for the search to drag up any past moving violations.

						--Doug
602.37it works like this...XLIB::SCHAFERMark Schafer, ISV Tech. SupportThu Sep 17 1992 14:253
    the Registry is like many others, they ask for the SSN, they don't tell
    you that it's acceptable to not provide it, and so most people
    volunteer the information to them.
602.38Social Security Office confirms its legalityERLANG::MILLEVILLEThu Sep 17 1992 15:133
Just talked with a person from the Social Security Office (800-772-1213).  They
say that for verification of identification, a bank/credit_union *CAN* use the
SSN for this purpose.
602.39Can <> ShouldFDCV14::DOTENstay hungryThu Sep 17 1992 15:3110
    RE: .38
    
    But it doesn't mean that they *should*. It's too easy to make someones
    life miserable if you know their SSN.
    
    The DEFCU should therefore stop the practice of using the SSN for
    identification and having it readily available to people who shouldn't
    be able to see it.
    
    -Glenn-
602.40ERLANG::MILLEVILLEThu Sep 17 1992 16:3314
.39> But it doesn't mean that they *should*. It's too easy to make someones
.39> life miserable if you know their SSN.

Someone already commented that they requested the teller use something else
to confirm identity, and that was done for them.  If you (or anyone else for
that matter) don't like using your SSN, then tell them to use something else.
There is no need to complain to DEFCU unless it is something that violates any
rule anywhere.  Using the SSN as verification is perfectly legal.  If other
customers of DEFCU don't mind DEFCU using the SSN for verification, then let
them be.

The bottom line is that DEFCU ought to make everyone AWARE that they can ask the
teller to (permanently) use some other form of verification if they feel uncom-
fortable with them using the SSN.
602.41Tellers should NOT have access to SSNFDCV14::DOTENstay hungryThu Sep 17 1992 16:4523
    You miss the point - the tellers should never have access to anyone's
    SSN. Yes, you can tell them to ask you some other personal piece of
    information, but there's your SSN staring them in the face all the
    same.
    
    If they already have access to the information I don't mind providing
    them with that information. The point is the tellers should not have
    access to my SSN (and there's probably some other personal information
    they have no business seeing on their screens). I have to agree with
    other folks who have said that since the tellers already have access to
    the SSN then there's no reason for you not to tell them your SSN to
    identify yourself.
    
>There is no need to complain to DEFCU unless it is something that violates any
>rule anywhere.
    
    Huh? That's like saying that if you see that something is wrong and if
    there's no law that currently exists to make it right then we shouldn't
    bother to pass a new law. The DEFCU is our credit union, we can make
    any changes or rules that we want (after being approved and all that,
    of course).
    
    -Glenn-
602.42PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 17 1992 17:092
    If I can't trust a bank/CU and its employees with my SSN, then I
    certainly won't trust them with my money.
602.43ERLANG::MILLEVILLEThu Sep 17 1992 17:469
.42> If I can't trust a bank/CU and its employees with my SSN, then I
.42> certainly won't trust them with my money.

Exactly.  That is why I am comfortable with their using my SSN.

Glenn, just how comfortable ARE you with DEFCU handling YOUR money if you don't
seem to be able to trust them with your SSN?  Even if you did find another bank
that didn't use your SSN for verification, the teller probably still has your
SSN on their screen.
602.44NAC::KINDELBill Kindel @ LKG1Thu Sep 17 1992 17:5819
    Re .42:
    
>   If I can't trust a bank/CU and its employees with my SSN, then I
>   certainly won't trust them with my money.
    
    That's true, but the problem is that too many OTHER people have had
    access to your SSAN and you can't always trust THEM.
    
    Consider a malevolent supermarket cashier who sees your Digital badge
    (thereby learning your name and employee number) and cashes your check
    using your Massachusetts Driver's License as identification (thereby
    learning your SSAN).  Sometime later, they phone DCU to get your
    account balances by impersonating you.  The DCU phone teller asks for
    your SSAN to confirm "your" identity and the impostor is off and
    running, transferring funds or whatever.
    
    My point in an earlier reply is that the SSAN isn't secret enough to be
    useful for authentication.  DCU should use something else as a matter
    of policy.
602.45What he said (.44)FDCV14::DOTENstay hungryThu Sep 17 1992 18:011
    
602.46private data should be on a "need to know" basisRGB::SEILERLarry SeilerThu Sep 17 1992 22:3426
    Re .42:
    
>   If I can't trust a bank/CU and its employees with my SSN, then I
>   certainly won't trust them with my money.
    
You are welcome to trust whom you please for what you please.  But in
fact you don't need to trust the tellers with your money -- there are
a great many auditing procedures to discover if bank employees are 
embezzling money, and if they do anyway, your deposits are insured.
It's hard to get around the controls unless you run the system itself...

But in fact, I do trust the tellers.  The POINT is that they shouldn't
have access to private information that they don't NEED to do their job!
I think nobody should see private information unless they need it to do 
their job -- not in personnel, not in payroll, and not at the DCU.

To make the point clearer, how would you feel if the teller's screen
displayed your salary?

	Larry

PS -- Although I have direct deposit, it is divided up among several
accounts, at the DCU and elsewhere, so even with access to my deposit
records, people at the DCU cannot find out my salary, FYI.  For some
people, DCU employees could indeed find out their salary -- but it
still does not pop up on the tellers' screens automatically.  LS
602.47Better than bitching about directorsCIMNET::KYZIVATPaul KyzivatThu Sep 17 1992 22:525
I haven't the patience to keep reading this topic, but I find it refreshing
that this now seems like the only thing anyone wants to talk about in the
DCU notes file.

	Paul
602.48ERLANG::MILLEVILLEWear Seatbelts, reduce costsFri Sep 18 1992 00:532
              <<< Note 602.47 by CIMNET::KYZIVAT "Paul Kyzivat" >>>
  RIGHT ON!! >>>>>>  -< Better than bitching about directors >-
602.49LUDWIG::JOERILEYEveryone can dream...Fri Sep 18 1992 06:261
    Can you spell paranoid?
602.50So tell us your SSN FDCV14::DOTENstay hungryMon Sep 21 1992 12:338
>    Can you spell paranoid?
    
    To show us all that you are not paranoid would you please post your SSN
    as a reply to this note? If you won't, would you please explain why
    not? It wouldn't be ........ paranoia would it? :-)
    
    -Glenn-
    
602.51STAR::BUDAWe can do...Mon Sep 21 1992 15:2424
Note 602.49 by LUDWIG::JOERILEY 

>    Can you spell paranoid?

There is a good book out about how easy it is to get information
about a person.  I will try to look up its title and pass
it on.

SSN numbers are easy to get.
You unlisted phone number can also be gotten.
Your birth date.
Where you were born.
How much you make a year.
etc...

All of this is available LEGALLY...

If you ONLY knew how easyit is and how it can be used against you.

You cannot be TOO paranoid about protecting personal information.
People who think otherwise need to pull their head out of
the sand and look around.

	-mark
602.52So what's your point?FDCV14::DOTENstay hungryMon Sep 21 1992 18:0512
>You cannot be TOO paranoid about protecting personal information.
>People who think otherwise need to pull their head out of
>the sand and look around.
    
    But that doesn't mean you have to make your SSN known to every Tom,
    Dick, and Harry that comes around.
    
    DEFCU tellers don't need access to your SSN; so they shouldn't have
    access.
    
    -Glenn-
    
602.53Here's who can fix thisCSC32::K_KINNEYTue Sep 29 1992 13:1013
    
    
    	For anyone who happens across this and wishes to contact
    	the person at DCU who has the authority to correct this,
    	send correspondence to the following persons:
    
    		Ernie Chevrette, Operations Services Coordinator
    		141 Parker St.
    		Maynard,MA 01754
    
    		Charles Cockburn, President
    		Same address
    
602.54Just another outlook on life.LUDWIG::JOERILEYEveryone can dream...Wed Sep 30 1992 02:4916
RE:.50 & 51

 	Sorry to take so long to reply back.  To post my social security 
 number here is not the same as a DCU teller having access to it.  The 
 teller is a professional doing a job, sure once in a while one goes bad
 and posts your personal information on the company bulletin board but for 
 the most part I think they really could care less about your personal life
 and just want to do their jobs as best they can.  You could always keep 
 your money in your mattress but then the cleaning lady might get it so I
 guess the only alternative is to spend it as you get it.  I'm sure there are 
 abuses but then no system is perfect.  Life is to short to waste it worrying
 about small stuff so lighten up a bit and enjoy it while you can.  If all this 
 means I got my head in the sand well at least I won't get an ulcer worrying
 about it.  I sure would like to read that book -mark, please post the title.
 
 Joe            
602.55TOMK::KRUPINSKIRepeal the 16th Amendment!Wed Sep 30 1992 11:567
>	You could always keep your money in your mattress 

	With the current interest rates, you might just as well keep
	your money under the mattress, at least then the government
	doesn't know what you have!

					Tom_K
602.56:-)FDCV14::DOTENstay hungryWed Sep 30 1992 12:3811
    RE: .55
    
    How true. I chuckled watching that TV shows "Wings" the other night
    when the pilot guy asked the mechanic if he had some money on him. He
    said "yea". The pilot asked him "how much"? Says he: "$7000".
    
    Now, the mechanic is a bit out of it to begin with but when he's asked
    why he has so much money on him he says "well, you have heard the name
    Charles Keating?"
    
    -Glenn-
602.57can't beat Uncle SamMONTOR::KYZIVATPaul KyzivatTue Mar 29 1994 23:2915
    Maybe its time to change the subject and lighten things up a bit.
    This probably isn't even the right conference for this subject, and the
    topic is old and stale, but anyway...

    If it is such a good idea to keep your social security number secret,
    why is it that our Federal Government, every January sends out several
    hundred million pieces of mail which have the recipients' SS# on the
    address label?

    And what can you do about it?  I guess you can rent a post office box
    so the mail isn't accessible, for one thing.  Then only the postal
    workers can get your SS# - no problem since they have been widely
    documented as being paragons of virtue.

	Paul