T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
129.1 | What's their strength | BONNET::ZIJL | I think I can, I think I can,.....,I did | Tue Dec 10 1991 15:06 | 7 |
| I've read a lot about Poland and Norway being nasty opponents. And the
results show it. What is in fact the strength of these teams. The
English should be familiar with the Polish strength. What is it that
makes these teams so tough, to my knowledge they don't have very much
top players??????????????????
Rob
|
129.2 | Tough to play in Oslo | GOTA1::APPELQVIST | | Tue Dec 10 1991 15:38 | 10 |
129.3 | negotiations | BONNET::ZIJL | The one who always loses his SODEXHO card | Wed Dec 11 1991 15:55 | 5 |
| Delegations from England, Poland, Norway, Turky and San Marino wil come
to Amssterdam january 20th to negotiate the dates for the matches to be
played.
Rob
|
129.4 | great draw | ESSB::BREE | | Thu Dec 12 1991 15:40 | 4 |
| It looks like a very easy group for England who should win out
comfortably.
Paul
|
129.5 | Are you sure???????????? | BONNET::ZIJL | The one who always loses his SODEXHO card | Thu Dec 12 1991 15:47 | 8 |
| reply 129.4
Aren't you a bit to optimistic Paul. I know England has a good team,
but so do Holland and Poland (they sure gave you the shivers in the EC
qualifitactions). And from what I heard Norway can be a tough opponent
playing at home.
Rob
|
129.6 | | QETOO::CHAVES | a broken clock is right twice a day | Fri Dec 13 1991 00:12 | 5 |
| I agree England should qualify along with Holland but not as easy as
Paul thinks.
JC
|
129.7 | turkeymania | VOGON::LINEY | | Sat Dec 28 1991 01:40 | 5 |
| I cannot believe England have drawn Poland and Turkey in the same group
yet again. ITS A FIX! Does anybody know if another clan of countries
keep getting drawn together. England and Holland will qualify at a
canter against the sheer quality of San Marino and alike.
|
129.8 | Wait a bit longer for the fixture list | RDGE31::POWELLC | Something incredibly witty | Fri Jan 10 1992 11:32 | 4 |
| According to yesterday's Guardian, the respective managers will now meet on
February 14th to agree their fixtures.
Chris.
|
129.9 | Satisfaction... | UTROP1::MIJNLIEFF_K | Orangie, Blangie, Blue ! | Tue Jan 14 1992 19:18 | 5 |
| The whole of Footballmindend Holland reacted positive to the opponents
in this group. Personally I think Holland and England should be able to
qualify. I hope the qualification games won't be as boring as the were
for the EC (sweden).
Kees
|
129.10 | Fixtures | RDGE30::POWELLC | Something incredibly witty | Thu Feb 20 1992 15:14 | 33 |
| Here are the fixtures for this group...
09-Sep-1992 Norway v San Marino
23-Sep-1992 Norway v Holland
23-Sep-1992 Poland v Turkey
07-Oct-1992 San Marino v Norway
14-Oct-1992 Holland v Poland
14-Oct-1992 England v Norway
28-Oct-1992 Turkey v San Marino
18-Nov-1992 England v Turkey
16-Dec-1992 Turkey v Holland
17-Feb-1993 England v San Marino
24-Feb-1993 Holland v Turkey
10-Mar-1993 San Marino v Turkey
24-Mar-1993 Holland v San Marino
31-Mar-1993 Turkey v England
28-Apr-1993 England v Holland
28-Apr-1993 Norway v Turkey
28-Apr-1993 Poland v San Marino
19-May-1993 San Marino v Poland
29-May-1993 Poland v England
02-Jun-1993 Norway v England
09-Jun-1993 Holland v Norway
08-Sep-1993 England v Poland
22-Sep-1993 San Marino v Holland
22-Sep-1993 Norway v Poland
13-Oct-1993 Holland v England
13-Oct-1993 Poland v Norway
27-Oct-1993 Turkey v Poland
10-Nov-1993 Turkey v Norway
10-Nov-1993 San Marino v England
10-Nov-1993 Poland v Holland
|
129.11 | Turkey is getting better and better | BODRUM::ERKUS | | Sun Jun 21 1992 00:37 | 19 |
|
Hi Guys
Please dont forget Turkey. Check their recent games and scores.
Luxembourg - Turkey 2.3
Turkey - Danemark 1.2
Germany - Turkey 1.0 Germany was lucky and Goal Keeper was also
great. Waiting for next time
SO Sepp Piontek has been creating a new young national team.
Turkey is COMING guys....
regards
Gokhan...
|
129.12 | Turks will give a tough game | SALES::THILL | | Mon Jun 22 1992 19:29 | 12 |
| I have to agree with the last note. In the 1990 qualifiers, Turkey came
reasonably close to qualifying. Of course they had to beat the USSR
away, which they couldn't do, but the Turks defeinitely moved away
from the "minnows." The Euro 92 qualifiers were dissapointing, but with
a little luck Turkey would have come away with some points from a tough
group.
Also, Turkish clubs have done well in the last few years in European
Compwtitions, making in to the later rounds. I think one club (Galastasaray
maybe?) made it to the final 8 of one of the cups this year.
Tom
|
129.13 | last score | BODRUM::ERKUS | | Mon Aug 31 1992 19:18 | 11 |
|
I would like to inform you guys that Turkey win it's last game.
Turkey 3 Bulgaria 2
I think Turkey will not be easy team to win BUT I dont think they can
get it to Finals.
What do you think about first game: Poland vs Turkey
Gokhan
|
129.14 | Two figures for Norway | GOTA1::APPELQVIST | If it don't stink, don't stir | Fri Sep 11 1992 12:05 | 15 |
|
Norway - San Marino
10 0
I saw the goals on Eurosport last night and some of them where really
crackers! Goal #10 (i think) came from a corner, and a Norwegian
forward healed (sp?) it on volley in to the net. A goal you make one in
a lifetime.
Norway must be concidered as a dangerous opponent. San Marino is not a
good team, but to score ten goals against them takes some skill. And
Norway did play well.
Mats
|
129.15 | | SIOG::SPENCER | Peter Spencer @DBO 827-2286 | Fri Sep 11 1992 13:40 | 1 |
| Nice shirts too ;-)
|
129.16 | Heia Norge!!! | GOTA1::APPELQVIST | If it don't stink, don't stir | Thu Sep 24 1992 16:04 | 11 |
|
Well, well, our friends from the west did it again!! Beated Holland
2-1, and reports says that they deserved the victory. Norway travels to
San Marino next time, and a week later they face England. Any fears
from the Brittish, or are you as confident as you where before EURO-92?
Mats
PS. Another result; Poland - Turkey 1 - 0
PPS. Any comments from Holland? Was the game live in dutch TV?
|
129.17 | Very Worrying | SUBURB::DURANTS | | Thu Sep 24 1992 17:13 | 12 |
|
Graham Failure is apparently "undaunted" by Norway's recent form.
However, he was exactly the same before England played Sweden in the
European Championship Finals.
Impossible to tell what England's midfield will be after the Spanish
defeat. Beardsley may return to partner Shearer in attack. Gazza looked
promising in the Lazio V Spurs friendly, but was not fit enough to play
a full game. Otherwise it appears there are no real outstanding ball players
available.
Steve.
|
129.18 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Thu Sep 24 1992 17:20 | 23 |
| rep -2
Mats,
I only saw the first half and based on that I can't say the Norwegians impressed
me, they gained a quick lead after 10 minutes with a penalty but Bergkamp
equilised for Holland in the same minute.
I think the Dutch problem is the defence, against Italia two weeks ago they
played with only two defenders and against Norway with four but only two can
be considered as real defenders, it's impossible to play inetrnational footy
this way in this time 'cause time after time you will get slaughtered.
I hope the new manager (Dick Advocaat) will make some changes 'cause there
are loads of good and strong defenders in Holland.
the other problem is our goal-keeper, Menzo might be ok for Ajax but I think
he can't take the pressure, always in importatnt games he will at least make
1 or 2 crucial mistakes, last season against the Italians in the UEFA cup proved
that, ajax were leading two goals to nothing and within no time he flunkes
twice and the score was 2-2, ajax then was lucky they scored another goal.
T_
|
129.19 | moved for your convenience | IMBUSY::SPAIN | There's always the U.S. | Thu Sep 24 1992 17:24 | 86 |
| <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 261.0 NORWAY - HOLLAND 2 - 1 1 reply
ELIS::GEELEN 80 lines 24-SEP-1992 13:18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NORWAY - HOLLAND 2 - 1
Last night I watched the World Cup qualification match between NORWAY and
HOLLAND and again 'we' (the Dutch) played a very poor game.
From the kick-off until the final whistle, 'we' had absolutely no chance
of winning the match.
After the match I watched Sport Studio, to see what "Dick"-(if you know what I
mean)-Advocaat had to say about the game.
...Well I was very surprised, when I heard him talk about the game.
Dick said that 'we' had about 4 or 5 big chances in the first half ????, what
was he talking about ??
I could only recall 2 chances for Holland in the whole game :
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Number 1 The goal of Dennis Bergkamp
- Number 2 A header of Wim Kieft late in the second half
Which match did Dick see than ?
Does he know anything about football ?
Actually he didn't talk about the terrible performance of some players during
the match.(Sonny Silooy, Danny Blind, Rob Witschge (or whatever), Johnny van
't Schip and even Marco van Basten)
He thought we performed reasonable; the only thing I saw was a very boring and
poor game (since 1988 we didn't play a good match, perhaps only on the EC in
Sweden against Germany)
When we started playing the Ajax system, with all the Ajax players we only
performed poor game's perhaps a new coach,system and new players would change
all this.
The first day I heard that Dick was going to be the new Coach of the Dutch
National team, I thought : "Are they crazy at the KNVB ?"
What has Dick ever accomplished , (if you know something then please tell me).
He was the former coach of Haarlem and SVV, I know that much.
(Why not make Leen Looyen Coach of the national team,I'd say (little joke
ofcourse)
At SVV he (Dick) run away at the end of the season, which saved the team from
dropping to the first division.
After that the KNVB thinks it's a logical step to make him assistant of Rinus
Michels and after Rinus retires they simply make Dick the new head coach.
Well last night I saw the consequences of their failure.
Dick puts Stanley Menzo in the goal instead of Ed de Goey.
Since Stanley is our keeper, we lost two matches in a row with 6 goals for our
opponents.
When good old Hans van Breukelen was in the goal this never happened !!
Dick chose Stanley because of the new rules made by the UEFA, but last night
Frank de Boer headed a ball to him (which he still may catch) and what was his
reaction.... he panicked and headed the ball away, instead of taking it into his
hands.
A keeper should know the rules !! Stanley doesn't know them apparently.
And then there was Sonny Silooy, after a few year with bad luck he was 'finally'
back in the national team.
But last night I didn't know why he was even selected, because he only made
errors, which lead to chances for the Norwegian team.
Some other major disasters were :
-Danny Blind, only in the team when Berry van Aerle is injured caused a penalty.
-Johnny van 't Schip lost several balls and his effectiveness was below zero.
-Marco van Basten didn't do much.
-And Rob W. was all over the field but never at the right time.
Why weren't Gaston Taument and Arthur Numan in the game instead of for instance
van 't Schip and Witschge.
And why wasn't Gerald Vanenburg even selected for the team, he's in an excellent
form at the moment, someone who is needed in the Dutch team at the moment.
This morning there wasn't much in the papers about the failure of the team and
the coach,... why I don't know!
Well that is all I have to say right know.
|
129.20 | moved for your convenience | IMBUSY::SPAIN | There's always the U.S. | Thu Sep 24 1992 17:25 | 18 |
| <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 261.1 NORWAY - HOLLAND 2 - 1 1 of 1
UTROP1::JANSEN "Reading Blondes have more fun" 12 lines 24-SEP-1992 13:23
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
rep -1
Dear Sir,
some of you comments are right but most of it is just crap!!!!!
T_
PS Gary or one of the other moderators please write lock 'cause these things
only take up space and there is already a topic where this can be discussed.
|
129.21 | If only... | FORTY2::FOWLERM | | Thu Sep 24 1992 21:43 | 21 |
| re: 17
I've said it before and I'll say it again. I think there are plenty of skill
players in the English league but for various reasons Taylor never picks them.
For example, Chris Waddle, Peter Beardsley, John Salako, Glenn Hoddle (old, but
still the greatest 8-))
Reason One is that Graham Taylor couldn't manage his way out of a paper bag.
Reason Two, and perhaps a more serious one, is that we play too many games. Yawn,
yawn, tired old subject, but it's true. Our best players are always injured,
whether in reality, or merely at the discretion of not very honest managers. It
takes more practice for these skill players to gel together, and we play way too
many league and cup matches to allow for national squad practice sessions. I
thought one aim of the premier league was to put a bit more emphasis on the
national squad, but it hasn't happened.
Anyway, just my opinions,
Mike
|
129.22 | pred: Norway 2 England 1 | CHEFS::HOUSEB | | Thu Oct 08 1992 11:24 | 6 |
| Norway romped to a 2-0 victory over San Marino to take their run to 3
wins out of 3. Next stop Wembley. Let's hope the English team approach
this game with their accustomed arrogance - it could make for an
interesting outcome.
Brian.
|
129.23 | | PEKING::NAGLEJ | | Thu Oct 08 1992 14:10 | 19 |
|
Especially if Graham Failure doesn't play Paul Gasket. Why
so much should rest on one player is beyond me but it has
to be said that he does make a difference.
If Waddle will be allowed to have a bash then we could be
witnessing a good game but England will more than likely
play their usual crap. Failure will then have enough excuses
to write a book. The title would be.......
WHY I COULDN'T MANAGE A PI$$ UP IN A BREWERY !!! A THOUSAND
REASONS.
I'll give the game to Norway.
Norway 65 England 0
JN.
|
129.24 | The shape of things to come. | ARRODS::OHAGANB | Dirk, Nasty, Stig, Barry, Leggy | Thu Oct 08 1992 18:31 | 9 |
| Norway to draw at Wembley and eventually go through to the finals
with Holland. Taylor by the end of 1993 will have finally found a
team after 4 years and 7000 players. The fact that Geoff Hurst
is included in preference to Ian Wright comes as no surprise.....
|
129.25 | | GOTA1::APPELQVIST | If it don't stink, don't stir | Fri Oct 09 1992 12:13 | 13 |
|
I'm not a fan of Brittish style football, but i'll tell you one thing;
They always give 100% effort in every game. There is so many times i've
read that England played like crap but managed to get a 1-0 win. There
is so many skillfull players that Taylor could pick out 3-4 teams that
will beat Norway nine times out of ten. Perhaps there is too many good
players to choose among.
A coach must experiment and use many plyer for a while, but eventually
he must find a team that can be trained to play together as a team. My
hopes is for Norway next week, but i suspect that England win the game.
Mats
|
129.26 | A mouthful of talent | OSLACT::HENRIKW | Cheer up with a fado | Fri Oct 09 1992 20:36 | 16 |
| A little piece of trivia:
Before playing Holland, Norway's coach Egil 'Drillo' Olsen
regretted Gullit's absence, finding "an advantage in facing
opponents with a bigger name than their actual skills".
Before playing England, he told Sky News that he hoped Gazza
would play on Wembley, since "it's an advantage to meet players
with a bigger mouth than talent".
Keep an eye on Mr Olsen's mouth on Wembley next Wednesday... ;^)
Henrik
|
129.27 | A mouthful of soap | CHEFS::HOUSEB | | Tue Oct 13 1992 11:08 | 14 |
| I see Gazza has done his bit for Anglo-Scandanavian relations.
A Norwegian journalist was watching England train at Bisham Abbey on
Sunday. Afterwards he approached Gazza and asked him if he had any
message for the people of Norway, Gazza replied "Yeah, F*** off Norway"
Big Lawrie McMenemy stepped in and diffused the situation and said it
was a lighthearted comment. The comment has been widely publicised in
Norway. Great move by Gazza, that should really fire the Norwegians up
Heres hoping they both teams can keep up their recent form.
Norway 2 England 1
Brian.
|
129.28 | Gazza bad, but not THAT bad | MOEUR3::SMITH | | Tue Oct 13 1992 12:17 | 17 |
|
Hey Brian,
Tell the rest of the story...
Gazza made a full apology to the journalist (who incidently was in
a restricted are - he shouldn't have been there), who had his cameras
rolling without having informed anyone. He also made a full apology to
the Norwegian people, also explaining that it was OBVIOUSLY a
light-hearted comment, and later gave a full exclusive interview to the
same Norwegian reporting team.
That's the full story and doesn't paint Gazza as blackly as your
reply Brian, however, I still think he was stupid, unthinking and all
the rest... I just hope he gets a hatrick.
Ian
|
129.29 | | CHEFS::HOUSEB | | Tue Oct 13 1992 13:47 | 10 |
| I just relayed the story as reported in yesterday's Independent. When
taken out of context the comment sounds stupid and irresponsible but if
you had been there and witnessed the light hearted incident I'm sure it
was very funny. But it is still the sort of comment which fires up
the opposition thanks to "constructive journalism".
I'm not trying to portray Gazza as anything in particular, the game
needs more characters like him.
Brian.
|
129.30 | What if... | OPG::TONY | | Tue Oct 13 1992 14:15 | 4 |
| I just wonder if a foreign player had made the same remark at England..
How would that have ve'been accepted by everyone...for example a German player..!
Tony
|
129.31 | Team News? | XSTACY::KMCGRATH | Long road, patient donkey | Tue Oct 13 1992 14:44 | 3 |
| Enough about Gaz...what about the rest of the team.
Who's going to be in the english side tomorrow?
|
129.32 | Adams...I dont think so. | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Tue Oct 13 1992 14:51 | 19 |
|
According to numerous papers today the team is:
Woods
Dixon
Adams
Walker
Pearce
Batty
Ince
Gascoigne
Platt
Shearer
Wright
Lets hope that Adams is replaced by Pallister and Batty replaced by
Merson(if fit) or Salako.
Dave...
|
129.33 | The Donkey | ESSB::BLONG | Rumbleows & Euro Super Cup Winners 92 | Tue Oct 13 1992 14:53 | 11 |
129.34 | Wright and Shearer......Rampant. | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Tue Oct 13 1992 17:23 | 6 |
|
The team has been announced and it is the one predicted by most of the
press and is as .32
Dave...who cant wait to see Gazza inspire England to a 3-0 win.
|
129.35 | Don't ask me about it - its only a prediction | MOEUR3::SMITH | | Tue Oct 13 1992 17:46 | 6 |
|
I had a dream last night, it went something like England beat Norway
9-0, yup, NINE. Gazza got four of them, and wait for it, Ian Rush
another! (yes I know he's Welsh!)
Some dream!!
|
129.36 | | TRUCKS::SANT | Torpedoed in Moskow.... | Tue Oct 13 1992 17:52 | 20 |
129.37 | The great one returns | SIOG::SPENCER | Peter Spencer @DBO 827-2286 | Tue Oct 13 1992 18:09 | 3 |
| It's great to see that superb footballer back in the English team.
Well deserved and well done Tony!
|
129.38 | 3 men and a donkey | YUPPY::PANES | Wasn't it fun in room 312 | Tue Oct 13 1992 18:09 | 6 |
|
I'm not sure that Taylor is right in using a flat back four. Maybe he thinks
an extra pair of hooves will come in handy.
Stuart
|
129.39 | Best Wishes...HONEST!! | DBOT07::RUSSELL | | Tue Oct 13 1992 19:46 | 10 |
| I'd like to wish England the very best of luck tomorrow night.
regards,
*TIGER*
PS. ...I mean this most sincerely.
PPS....I really do.
|
129.40 | World beware !! Gazza's back.... | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Wed Oct 14 1992 10:38 | 16 |
|
Well England start off there campaign against an inform Norway side
who to be quite frank couldn't have asked for an easier start, with
the exception of Holland, but Norway's real test is tonight against
a strike force that if they were to click could be the most exciting
in world football with Gazza running at them from midfield Platts late
runs into the box a three or four nil win won't be surprise so I'm
going to stick my neck out and go for a scoreline of
England 4 Norway 0
Gazza
Shearer2
Wright
Wright
Neil...
|
129.41 | | STKOFF::SPERSSON | Pas de probleme | Wed Oct 14 1992 12:15 | 34 |
|
Well it's always easier to say "I told you so!" when you actually
have, so I'll stick my neck out too:
So the Most Overrated Footballer in the World makes a come-back. That
won't make a difference. However:
Seriously, even if England prove time and time again that they are not
among the World's top teams, they should not have a problem with Norway
at home.
It is reported in the papers today that the Norwegian people expect
a win. Norway have not won an away game against anyone but 4th rate
opposition for as long as I can remember. I cannot see why a fluky win
at home against a very disappointing Holland should point in a new
direction.
The home advantage in European Football is becoming ever more
significant (I think this has partly to do with the deteriorating
standard of refereeing). To be honest Sweden's success in the European
Chanpionships owes a lot to this fact. Norway are among the teams that
can cause disturbances at home to any other team (like other 3rd rate
nations such as Turkey, Finland, Greece, Israel etc) but they will never
stand a chance of qualifying.
This group will be decided between England, Poland, Holland in their
internal clashes and it will be a bonus for the others if Norway can
sneak a point here and there. That's about it.
Now, did I stick my neck out long enough?
cheers,
Stefan
|
129.42 | OTT | TRUCKS::WARDR | | Wed Oct 14 1992 12:38 | 7 |
| RE: all this Gazza gibbering .. I seem to recall the same inordinate
amount of fuss as to whether Kevin Keegan played in England teams
or not. A particularly memorable one, was whether he would play
against Scotland one year - yes/no/yes/no/yes/no - he did in the
end and England lost .. nuff said ..
Ray
|
129.43 | Most overrated in England...... | KBOMFG::TANNER | We're one, but we're not the same | Wed Oct 14 1992 12:50 | 11 |
|
Stefan, the way the English team played in Sweeden is the real reason behind
the gazza hype. Not too many people know him outside of England. You wont find
too many non-English people claiming gazza to be the best player in the world.
Stefan your boys have a chance tonight, not because Norway is a great or
good team no, its just because England are a weak team.
-dave-
|
129.44 | Salako... | FORTY2::FOWLERM | | Wed Oct 14 1992 13:04 | 8 |
| All this talk about Gazza is very nice, but I think the biggest mistake our man
Taylor has made is not playing Salako. Who is this Ince bloke anyway?
I hope Salako is at least on the bench, so he can be brought on at half time.
John Barnes is dead, long live King John Salako.
Mike
|
129.45 | What a sensible note!! | YUPPY::PANES | Dan Quayle? Just say noe! | Wed Oct 14 1992 13:11 | 16 |
| <<< Note 129.44 by FORTY2::FOWLERM >>>
-< Salako... >-
>All this talk about Gazza is very nice, but I think the biggest mistake our man
>Taylor has made is not playing Salako. Who is this Ince bloke anyway?
>I hope Salako is at least on the bench, so he can be brought on at half time.
>John Barnes is dead, long live King John Salako.
>Mike
My sentiments entirely. Keep up the good work.
Stuart
|
129.46 | Du gamla, du sjuka... | OSLACT::NORLAV::arnek | | Wed Oct 14 1992 13:13 | 14 |
| Re .41
So, the Most Overrated Country in the World is still sore about the Winter
Olympics...
Re .43
Stefan is definitely not one of our Norwegian boys, he's Swedish (need I say more?)
Btw: Did you see the results from the under-21 teams last night:
England 0 - Norway 2
--arne
|
129.47 | Hindsight in advance | OSLACT::HENRIKW | I need no spell chequer | Wed Oct 14 1992 13:32 | 10 |
| No further comments about the giraffe who stuck his neck out
in .41. But in the good tradition of blaming one's defeats
on a poor performance and the opponent's luck (as opposed to
talent), my bet for tonight is England 3, Norway 1. The only
reason being that Norway never played up to par, and England
had a lucky spell.
The dark horse tonight may be the Mexican referee...
Henrik
|
129.48 | | STKOFF::SPERSSON | Pas de probleme | Wed Oct 14 1992 13:31 | 18 |
|
> Stefan, the way the English team played in Sweeden is the real reason behind
> the gazza hype. Not too many people know him outside of England.
> You wont find too many non-English people claiming gazza to be the
> best player in the world.
I think the problem might be reverse. People outside England have seen
more than enough of Gazza. It is the English that have not seen enough
of other countries' footballers, they just assume that if you
stand out in the English League you're automatically World Class.
> Stefan your boys have a chance tonight, not because Norway is a great or
> good team no, its just because England are a weak team.
Dave,
A slight misunderstanding. I'm Swedish, not Norwegian (spit, spit,
spit)
|
129.49 | Sorry... | KBOMFG::TANNER | We're one, but we're not the same | Wed Oct 14 1992 13:41 | 4 |
|
I should have guessed with a name like Stefan that you were Sweedish...
-dave-
|
129.50 | GAZZA=WORLD CLASS | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Wed Oct 14 1992 13:51 | 10 |
| Re.48
Oh thats it is it,we arent able to spot a good player,so is that why
the Italians are making such a big fuss of him,I mean there arent too
many good players in the Italian league are there.
Face it lads,love him or hate him,he would walk into all your National
sides.
Dave...
|
129.51 | IRELAND= ZIMMER FRAME | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | NEVER FELT MORE LIKE SINGING THE BLUES | Wed Oct 14 1992 14:09 | 8 |
|
re-1
Thats not true, he wouldn't get in Irelands team he's far to
skillful and he cant launch the ball into orbit.
Andy..B
|
129.52 | All talk and NO glory!!!!!! | KBOMFG::TANNER | We're one, but we're not the same | Wed Oct 14 1992 16:03 | 19 |
|
The laughing stock of Europe..... Andy what's yer record in Euro competition
after ye qualified and got to play good teams, like Ireland, Holland, former
Russia, Demark etc..... Like should we remind you how many goals ye scored!!!!!
Iam just surprised your not playing tonight the way your talking, you seem
to know a lot about success. Maybe that's why English fans are not well liked
anywhere in the World (except Siberia) your always talking about how your going
to stuff the opposition, and by how many goals. Let's be realistic the only
fans on the planet that can speak in such terms are the German fans, and I
haven't met too many big-headed ones yet.
The sonner "Scotty" beams a few of ye back to earth then maybe we will hear
more realistic views in future.
-dave-
p.s I realistically think Ireland will scrape a draw against Denmark tonight,
although it will be very difficult without Mcgrath, here's hoping.
|
129.53 | Hmm | ISEPUB::CHAMPOLLION | Can-tas-tic | Wed Oct 14 1992 16:40 | 17 |
129.54 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | NEVER FELT MORE LIKE SINGING THE BLUES | Wed Oct 14 1992 16:45 | 9 |
| RE-52
How many goals did Ireland score in the European championships
in Sweden ?
Enough said...
Andy...B
|
129.55 | Deeply moved | ISEPUB::CHAMPOLLION | Can-tas-tic | Wed Oct 14 1992 16:59 | 227 |
| <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.0 England V Norway 16 replies
UPROAR::WOODWARDD "Dave Woodward" 17 lines 13-OCT-1992 15:31
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
England team for the game 2nite is :
Woods
Dixon
Pearce
Batty
Walker
Adams (groan)
Platt
Gazza (hooray)
Shearer
Wright
Ince
Lets do it !!!!
<<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.1 England V Norway 1 of 16
NEWOA::BURTON 4 lines 13-OCT-1992 15:55
-< Are yer shaw... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is'nt the game 2morrow.
Nige.
<<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.2 England V Norway 2 of 16
LOOKIN::MISTRY 5 lines 13-OCT-1992 15:59
-< Adams oh no >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
Yep the game is tomorrow. Question is why is he playing Adams and Ince....
Bipin.
<<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.3 England V Norway 3 of 16
UPROAR::WOODWARDD "Dave Woodward" 5 lines 13-OCT-1992 16:01
-< days like these >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
re :base
yes sorry, in state of shock re :adams/dixon/ince !
dw.
<<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.4 England V Norway 4 of 16
MIACT::CARTERR "Confused of Birmingham.." 5 lines 13-OCT-1992 16:01
-< Sky at night? >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is the game on 'real' TV, or do I need to purchase some architectural
acne in order to see the Lions roar, via Murdoch/Wonka-vision.
Joe Public.
<<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.5 England V Norway 5 of 16
ARRODS::OHAGANB "Dirk, Nasty, Stig, Barry, Leggy" 8 lines 13-OCT-1992 16:11
-< Analogies-ville, Arizona >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
re .last
I really can't see the lions roaring with ringmaster Grim Taylor
cracking the whip. :^)
barry.
<<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.6 England V Norway 6 of 16
PEKING::SHALLOMA 12 lines 13-OCT-1992 17:00
-< Adams isnt related to TAYLOR is he??? >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rep-last few
Yeah,I agree that I would prefer Adams out of the team and personally
have Pallister in.But you can't really argue with the inclusion of
Ince,he is playing the best football of his career and don't think he
will let down anyone..
Regards,
Aron...
<<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.7 England V Norway 7 of 16
OSLACT::HENRIKW "I need no spell chequer" 7 lines 13-OCT-1992 17:15
-< A view from abroad >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems to me - from across the North Sea - that Norway has never
been *less* underestimated before an international game.
Judging from your comments, the Norwegian slogan should
be "Clone Adams!"...
Henrik
(Oslo)
<<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.8 England V Norway 8 of 16
FUTURS::FLETCHER 7 lines 13-OCT-1992 17:32
-< Get down the pub >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bet this note does not last until the morning.
(something about not creating new topics for individual matches)
PS. Its on SKY at 7
Nigel
<<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.9 England V Norway 9 of 16
UPROAR::WOODWARDD "Dave Woodward" 8 lines 14-OCT-1992 07:14
-< just hangin around >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
re: -1
ITS 07:15 am + we're still here !!!!
dw.
<<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.10 England V Norway 10 of 16
PEKING::BAREFIELDA "NEVER FELT MORE LIKE SINGING THE BLUES" 13 lines 14-OCT-1992 08:40
-< !@#$% >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have a good feeling about tonight, but then again I had a good
feeling before the european championships. This has got to be the
best team that England have fielded under Taylor apart from Adams.
Prediction for tonight..
ENGLAND 2 NORWAY 1
Platt
Shearer
ANDY..B
<<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.11 England V Norway 11 of 16
NEWOA::BURTON 7 lines 14-OCT-1992 09:05
-< England 2 Norway 0 >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Go on ENGLAND!!!!
Just do it.
Cheers
Nige.
<<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.12 England V Norway 12 of 16
ARRODS::OHAGANB "Said you came from Memphis" 3 lines 14-OCT-1992 09:45
-< Look, no smileys. >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Adams to be man of the match tonight.
barry.
<<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.13 England V Norway 13 of 16
MACNAS::MJGREANEY "Bananna Republic" 1 line 14-OCT-1992 10:53
-< where's "Our Nige's" place???? >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.14 England V Norway 14 of 16
MADBAS::DREES "Relegation....??" 8 lines 14-OCT-1992 11:07
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree we one of the earlier notes. Why a seperate topic for this
match ? There is after all a group topic where any comments about this
match should be placed.
Well Mod ?
Del
<<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.15 England V Norway 15 of 16
UPROAR::WOODWARDD "Dave Woodward" 6 lines 14-OCT-1992 12:08
-< I'm still standing >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
re : the *very* existence of this topic.
I must pull some weight with the mods :-) :-)
dw.
|
129.56 | Grow up Andy..... | KBOMFG::TANNER | We're one, but we're not the same | Wed Oct 14 1992 17:01 | 14 |
|
Andy I was beting on you coming back with that "childish" remark which folks
are used to. At least we know that Scotland are the best British team after the
Euro 92, but that wasn't hard.
The Irish don't spend half their lives braging about a team that plays
Rubbish, unlike you. When we win great, if we lose (which hasn't been often in
the past 5 years) then tough, but we except defeat, and agree that the
opposition were better. Jimmy Hill is probably related to you, now there's a
man who knows what he's talking about (::). So Andy the next time yer beaten
don't go saying "Well if the defence had played better we might have won" You
need mega brain cells to come up with that conclusion.
-dave-
|
129.57 | SAME OLD MICKS.. | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | NEVER FELT MORE LIKE SINGING THE BLUES | Wed Oct 14 1992 17:21 | 12 |
129.58 | | PEKING::NAGLEJ | | Wed Oct 14 1992 17:56 | 22 |
|
Whether Gazza is in the team or not won't make a spit of
difference when up against Norway who are on the crest of
a wave at the moment. They have faith in themselves unlike
England who need a lift to regain their confidence. Maybe
Gazza will do this but until that ball starts rolling
England won't win much.
BTW, whether you like Gazza or not he proved in Italia '90
that he is/was one of the worlds greatest players. He stood
out amongst the handful in the world cup. He won't, however,
be the worlds number one. He may have been had he not busted
his knee but he only has himself to blame for that.
I can see England trying very hard tonight but with Adams in
defence, Ince in the middle and players like Salako on the
bench I can see that any Norwegian attack will over run the
back four, especially if its through the middle.
Norway 4 England 1
JN.
|
129.59 | Another non victory... | CLARID::KREYER | Andre KREYER - Valbonne | Thu Oct 15 1992 03:53 | 12 |
|
For whoever predicted/whished a trashing for Norway, eat your
own words.....
The mighty England drew against Norway 1 - 1 at Wembley.
Please stop rating either some players or the whole team, they
are simply no good at the moment as their results demonstrate.
Jamie, go and hide somewhere for the next two weeks...
.Andre.
|
129.60 | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK. | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Thu Oct 15 1992 10:23 | 17 |
|
Re-59
What a load a rubbish you are spouting, if you had seen the game you
would know this was a very good England performance if wasn't for some
bad finishing then England would have won this game comfortably, fair
play to Norway who came and got what they wanted, remember one thing
England drew there opener qulifier against Sweden in the last World
Cup qulifiers then went on to become the fourth best team in the world.....
To all you Gazza bashers, watch this game and relise YOU ARE watching
one of the best players in the world, up until last night he had only
played two competitive games in 17 months and looked as if he hadn't
been out at all, he is pure class....
Neil.....
|
129.61 | | CHEFS::HOUSEB | | Thu Oct 15 1992 11:23 | 22 |
| If it wasn't for this, if it wasn't for that......
Come on Neil England could only scrape a disappointing 1-1 draw against
a second rate footballing nation on the hallowed turf. And Norway
*were* a second rate team, ok they've stuffed San Marino and beat
Holland but last night's performance showed they are a very limited
team.
Hold up your hand - England as a team were not good enough to beat
them, whether you blame it on your strikers or your central defenders
for being happy just to "hoof" balls forward in hope - the bottom line
reads the same NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
As for Gazza'a performance it is great to see him back and lasting 90
minutes, but I thought he was a couple of yards too slow all over the
park. Taylor needed Salako or Merson on from the start.
Well England have Turkey next and I suppose you'll all be happy to
scrape a point against another second rate team.
Brian.
|
129.62 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Thu Oct 15 1992 11:23 | 4 |
| Holland - Poland 2-2
T_
|
129.63 | Good Performance,results will come. | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Oct 15 1992 11:26 | 10 |
|
No complaints from me,if you dont take chances you dont win
games.England created more chances in this game than they have in the
last 5 games put together.Shearer and Wright both missed chances but
they will come,keep them together.
Even Adams had a good game,hopefully(injuries permitting) Taylor will
be able to field the same team next month v Turkey,apart from Lee Dixon
who will lose his place to Rob Jones if fit.
Dave...
|
129.64 | Nearly there | UPROAR::WOODWARDD | Dave Woodward | Thu Oct 15 1992 11:29 | 8 |
| Yes , England actually played some decent football which is a *good*
sign for the future. Norway were let off the hook and were lucky to get
a draw.
Even Tony (ee-aww) Adams played well - very well actually.
The results will come if we carry on playing like this.
dw.
|
129.65 | ingerland | ESSB::BREE | | Thu Oct 15 1992 11:36 | 25 |
|
re: Gazza
Gazza is a good footballer. He is also rude and stupid, plays for a
mediocre club side and a mediocre national side.
Therefore he is unlikely to ever be mentioned in the same context as
Pele, Best, Cruyff, Charlton, Beckenbauer etc.
Re: Last night's result
Saying that if the finishing was better you would have won could be
said for most teams.
I think England did remarkably well last night to get a point. Norway
have had a good run and must have fancied themselves.
England will still qualify comfortably because they have the best
players in the world, their league is the most competitive, their
players have bottle, they never give up, they've got Jimmy Hill......
.......
Paul
:) :) :)
|
129.66 | #$&@Menzo@&$# !! | ELIS::GEELEN | | Thu Oct 15 1992 11:46 | 14 |
| Everybody sing :
Say.....oeh....aah....Ed de Goey,
Say.....oeh....aah....Ed de Goey
If Stanley Menzo was not in the goal last night in the game against
poland,than we would have won the match easily, with at least 2-0.
But now, due to some major errors of 'our' keeper Menzo, we drew 2 - 2.
After 20 minutes 2 goals behind against Poland ?
.....unbelievable
|
129.67 | England are back | XNOGOV::PATTISON | We All Stand | Thu Oct 15 1992 12:08 | 11 |
| Good to see England putting in a performance they can be proud of.
Norway came to defend and missed chances or not, England could only
score once so they must have been very happy.
Gazza looks much slimmer than I've ever seen him, he stood out as a
different class last night. I'm looking forward to seeing him fully
fit. Why he finds it necessary to do stupid things like elbowing the
Norwegian defende I'll never know.
Adrian
|
129.68 | | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | Ahhhh, Pigsy | Thu Oct 15 1992 12:31 | 22 |
| I won't be critisicing this England performance. I thought the whole
team played well, and if they play to this standard throughout the
tournament, they'll qualify.
I wouldn't break up Shearer/Wright. I thought they had the makings of a
good partnership. Gazza was very good for a guy in his first
competitive 90 minutes is 17 months. Batty, Platt, Pearce all played
well.
Norway suprised me by their mediocrity. They weren't very good were
they?
Platt, Shearer, Wright all should have scored. However, no complaints
about a cracking equaliser, and hats off to Norway for sneaking a draw.
The chip-on-shoulder brigade are going to criticise whatever. England
are about as popular as a soiled nappy to some. But hey, who gives a
sh*t! I love `em anyway.
Tony
|
129.69 | | TRUCKS::SANT | Torpedoed in Moskow.... | Thu Oct 15 1992 12:42 | 21 |
|
England didn't "scrape" a draw last night, they dominated the
in-form Norwegians for long periods of the game and will be
disappointed but not devastated at only getting a point.
But fair enough, if you don't take your chances whilst you're
controlling the game you will often get caught out by the late
equaliser. Ian Wright missed two chances that he'd have buried
in an Arsenal shirt, so that's that.
I was proved right about the distribution from the full-backs;
Dixon's crossing and passing in attack was woeful. Adams, though,
had a good game - yes, I know ;-)
Batty and Ince did a lot of work to allow Gascoigne to create
with the ball, and I thought this side showed a lot of promise.
For heavens' sake, there are still 9 games left for England. We'll
be there at the end of this group...
Andy.
|
129.70 | So yer all happy with a point now!!!!!! | KBOMFG::TANNER | We're one, but we're not the same | Thu Oct 15 1992 12:49 | 18 |
|
I see no one complaining why England didn't win by a clear 3 goal margin
last night!!!!! All of a sudden you seem very happy with a point!!!!! Well Well
and the English team played well!!!! yea they sure did they managed to score a
goal!!!!! and that against a second rate team at home.. no offense to Norway.
At least I predicted realistically when I mentioned a point against the
present Euro champions would be a great result and that's what we got, but Iam
not braging about it..
Re .65 Yea Paul your right England will qualify easily, they have the best
players, the best striking force in the world, and if by chance they
don't make it, Iam sure some of their supporters will try to convince
us that they really did!!!!!!!!
p.s JF, congrats on your team winning, Cantona scored an excellent goal.....
-dave-
|
129.71 | Well done Grim. | ARRODS::OHAGANB | Said you came from Memphis | Thu Oct 15 1992 12:52 | 9 |
| Taylor should certainly stick with this team, obviously replacing
Dixon with Rob Jones and perhaps making either Ince or Batty expendable
if need be. Adams played very well (did'nt I tell you) and Wright_M
should be a bit worried now about his England career. Give this team,
with the above modifications, a few more run-outs and England could
well qualify.
barry.
|
129.72 | Finding victory in a draw | OSLACT::HENRIKW | I need no spell chequer | Thu Oct 15 1992 13:09 | 9 |
| Yes, we were very lucky. 1-1 on Wembley is celebrated as a victory
over here in Norway. And we may well be a second-rate country,
but it sure is strange how the 'first-rate countries' still fail
to beat us...
Still, it'll be nice to enjoy watching England play again,
without hoping they won't score a second goal. ;^)
Henrik
|
129.73 | O'Noters off again...YAWN. | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Oct 15 1992 13:27 | 10 |
|
Re.70
Who are the noters that are happy with a point,no one is.We could and
should have hammered them but we didnt,what you will find is that most
of the English noters are pleased with the way the team played.We are
only concerned with England,so why dont you concentrate on your own
National side,your Boring.
Dave...
|
129.74 | | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | Ahhhh, Pigsy | Thu Oct 15 1992 13:31 | 7 |
| How nice to hear that. It makes a change from the whining Scots and
Irish who are more interested in attacking England than talking about
their own teams.
Tony
|
129.75 | | PEKING::NAGLEJ | | Thu Oct 15 1992 13:31 | 12 |
|
Well I thought Norway deserved the win. Englands goal was a
lucky deflection from a donkey shot.
Gazza was fat and slow and Adams is about as creative as
toilet paper.
Yet Grim Failure thought it was a "right result".
An England Veterans team could out play the current side.
JN.
|
129.76 | Its points that count! | KBOMFG::TMCMANUS | | Thu Oct 15 1992 13:42 | 13 |
| It's really nice to read about all you folks saying how well England
played on the night and what an improvement in performance you saw...
BUT...in a years time when the crunch comes, all that you'll remember
about last nights game was the home point dropped, it *may* prove
decisive.
Qualifying is all about amassing more points than the other teams in
your group, whether you play well in doing so is besides the point.
I'll betcha that last night's "excellent team performance" will come
back and bite yer bums!
Tom
|
129.77 | England played ok :-( :-( | MADBAS::DSMITH | ONE THOMAS BROLIN... | Thu Oct 15 1992 13:43 | 25 |
|
Having watched the highlights of the game last night, I reckon England
should be pretty pleased with their performance, if not the result.
They certainly should have scored more than the 1 goal and have had the
match well and truly over before the Norwegians scored. One thing that
impressed me was the sharpness of Shearer and Wright up-front although
their finishing was pretty poor. Also, where was the midfield when the
Norwegian guy picked up the ball before scoring. He had loads of time
and space to get it under control before firing in the shot.
Danny.
ps Some of the noters seem to be getting pretty upset about comments
from the Scots and Irish fans. You should realise that all/most Scots,
Irish, Welsh love to wind up England supporters and love to see England
fall flat on their faces. This is due to the hype and arrogance of the
tabloid rags, commentators and certain players who think that England
is the be-all and end-all.
pps As a Scotsman, I admit that Scotland were utter crap last night and
were very fortunate to get a draw.
ppps I saved my only cheer of the night until Norway equalised :-)
|
129.78 | TA = MOTM | SIOG::SPENCER | Peter Spencer @DBO 827-2286 | Thu Oct 15 1992 13:48 | 1 |
|
|
129.79 | YAWN | SEDSWS::WILLMOTT | | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:05 | 14 |
|
RE last. You bet or Hope ;^)
Re .75 " Well I thought Norway deserved the win"
What ?? I might be reading you all wrong here, are you serious ?
In these troubled economic times it's good to see there is still some
consistency in life. England actually play well (but don't get the
result) and we STILL get the "Let's slag of the English cos I don't
really have anything better to say" brigade spouting b*ll*cks.
Thanks .65
|
129.80 | Relax Dave...... | KBOMFG::TANNER | We're one, but we're not the same | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:08 | 13 |
|
Re .73....
Dave I suggest you read note .77 the ps section.... That basically sums up
some of my entries in this topic. The sooner some of ye realise that England are
a second rate team the better. Why do so some of ye start predicting some
hilarious result like 4-0 for England?? Dave the only wording missing from
Dannys note is that some of the noters in here think England are the be-all and
end-all.
-dave-
p.s Do you also consider the English team boring????
|
129.81 | GET HIM OUT | SUBURB::COMMIT | Commit Group | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:30 | 25 |
| This Dave Tanner is really annoying. I've never heard such rubbish,
but whatdo you expect from the Scottish. He's just jealous cos he ain't
English.
Why do the Scots celebrate when they go out of the European
Championships.
Its about time that the Scottish woke up.
We'll Scotland World Cup campaign is going really well ain't it.
SWITZERLAND 3 SCOTLAND 1
SCOTLAND 0 PORTUGAL 0
Why don't you go into your own note and start making excuses cos
Scotland are fast becoming a joke.
And Leeds will beat Rangers.
Terry
|
129.82 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:31 | 8 |
|
RE.80
Do I consider the England team boring ???
No....not when compared to Ireland.
Dave...
|
129.83 | | SEDSWS::WILLMOTT | Yok youself | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:31 | 12 |
|
re .77
Fair comment about the tabloid papers and I for one have no objection
to some of the replies about England, yours for example is a done with
a smile or :-( to be exact. It's the more un-tongue in cheek notes
which run deeper than being pissed off with tabloid newspapers which
bore the sh*t out of me.
Chris
|
129.84 | | FORTY2::ETHERIDGE | No way figure 4 | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:38 | 12 |
129.85 | | AYOV11::KMCCLELLAND | The Honest Truth | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:46 | 10 |
| re .81
"He's just jealous cos he ain't English"
That has to be the biggest load of manure ever entered in this
conference.
Wake up mate, no Scot would *EVER* choose to be english instead.
Kev...
|
129.86 | The Home International Abuse League 1992 | ARRODS::OHAGANB | Said you came from Memphis | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:51 | 4 |
| Refreshments are available from the foyer should an intermission
occur. :^)
barry.
|
129.87 | If Only!! The great English Excuse | ESSB::BLONG | I Was There on the Stretford End | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:52 | 6 |
129.88 | Stop talking and let the Sun Shine... | VAXVLS::CCASEY | | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:53 | 15 |
129.89 | Honest guv.... | TRUCKS::SANT | Torpedoed in Moskow.... | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:55 | 13 |
|
This notes conference should be renamed the XENOPHOBIC conference,
because that's what it's degenerated into...8-(
Some of the English noters' contributions are as bad/worse as
some of the non-English noters' contributions so don't any of
you get all steamed up about my comments being directed
specifically at *YOU*.
The crap is coming from both sides of the fence. Who started it?
Who cares....................
Andy.
|
129.90 | Trevor "Brylcreem" Brooking | CHEFS::HOUSEB | | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:57 | 11 |
| re .87
The best one from Brooking was in the first half when a Platt pass was
blocked by the ref and Norway took possession . One of their forwards
then got chopped down on the edge of the box and Brooking thought that
the ref shouldn't have given the free kick because the ball rebounded
to the Norwegian off of him and that would have levelled things up.
Laughable, the English commentators really are something else.....
Brian
|
129.91 | Hidden | ISEPUB::CHAMPOLLION | Can-tas-tic | Thu Oct 15 1992 15:15 | 7 |
129.92 | Gazza is back | FUTURS::FLETCHER | | Thu Oct 15 1992 15:17 | 7 |
| RE:-1
You should have heard the Scotch one on SKY.
England were playing Sweden as well according to him.
Nigel
|
129.93 | A Scotch what...? | MADBAS::DSMITH | ONE THOMAS BROLIN... | Thu Oct 15 1992 15:35 | 9 |
|
re - 1
Is that a Scotch whisky, a scotch egg or what?
I think we should be told..
Danny.
|
129.94 | the need to score | BUNTY::MISTRY | | Thu Oct 15 1992 15:56 | 9 |
| Hi,
Lets all be honest, England played well and deserved to win. However, as all
good football managers are prone to saying, "We would have won if we'd scored
more goals".
Bipin.
|
129.95 | !@$%^& | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | NEVER FELT MORE LIKE SINGING THE BLUES | Thu Oct 15 1992 16:07 | 6 |
|
RE-90
At least Brooking knows the players names, not like that traiter
Charlton..
|
129.96 | unlucky | DBOT07::RUSSELL | | Thu Oct 15 1992 16:22 | 12 |
| As an Irishman, I would like to say that I thought England played
very well, they looked skillful, and just needed some more decisiveness
in attack to polish off a very neat performance.
The Norway goal was a beauty, but ENgland should have had the game
signed, sealed and delivered at that stage.
You will play worse and win.
Cheers,
*Tiger*
|
129.97 | Charlton the No. 1...... | VAXVLS::CCASEY | | Thu Oct 15 1992 16:35 | 12 |
| re .95
sounds like a bit of jealousy that england wasted the chance of having
Charlton as manager....
cause
J. Charlton V. G.(PRO Man) Taylor
result at least 10 - 0
if scores could go into minus then Taylor would have one....
Colin....
|
129.98 | Changing the subject . . . | FORTY2::ASH | Grahame Ash @REO | Thu Oct 15 1992 16:41 | 6 |
| So what's up with Holland then? They (and England of course) were going to
walk away with this group. England continue to get results (well, sometimes!)
with a bunch of definitely not world-class footballers but Holland, with REAL
world-class performers just don't manage it - what's up Ton?
grahame
|
129.99 | Good but Not Good Enough | WOTVAX::MACDONALDI | Stalybridge Celtic | Thu Oct 15 1992 17:18 | 27 |
|
England did everything right last night, their only problem was putting
it in the back of the net. Wright and Shearer are very quick, Shearer
the unluckier of the two, great header of the ball.
The midfield looked solid enough and played well with gazza just in
front. They definately needed some form of winger, that was a
department in which we were lacking. Where was Andy Sinton ???
The back four I think is the main concern, alright Adams played well
enough but did you count the amount of times he hoofed it up the park,
looked like he played for the wombles.... Woods was never really tested
until the goal arrived, to which he may have been at fault. Using the
wrong arm to go for the ball!!???
Anyway from what I heard Scotland played bobbins and were lucky to hold
on to the draw. Only 22,000 turned up at Ibrox, due to prices ranging
from 12-20 pounds a go, not surprising for no goals.....
mac (an exiled Scot in Angleterre)
p.s. talking a few back about commentators knowing the players, after
the highlights on Sportsnight, Jimmy (the chin, i'm the god of english
football) Hill was asked to comment on some of the moves that England
nearly scored on. One move involved three players, in which resulted in
Platt chesting it down, turning and shooting, and the player that
passed the ball on the volley was number 11 (paul ince) not ian wright,
and this had be replayed about 2/3 times during the highlights... What
can you say.
|
129.100 | CHARLTON IS A DESPICABLE PERSON | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | NEVER FELT MORE LIKE SINGING THE BLUES | Thu Oct 15 1992 17:25 | 11 |
| re-97
Jealous! do be sensible.. I would rather keep Taylor, at least
he knows the names of his players. I suprised Jack Charlton isn't
a player manager, he's about the right age.
Lets face it, we all know its a long way off, but in all noters
hearts of hearts, we all know England will be at the Finals.
Andy...B
|
129.101 | Menzo weg ermee | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Thu Oct 15 1992 17:53 | 36 |
| <<< Note 129.98 by FORTY2::ASH "Grahame Ash @REO" >>>
-< Changing the subject . . . >-
>>So what's up with Holland then? They (and England of course) were going to
>>walk away with this group. England continue to get results (well, sometimes!)
>>with a bunch of definitely not world-class footballers but Holland, with REAL
>>world-class performers just don't manage it - what's up Ton?
>>grahame
Grahame,
I though nobody would ask :-)))
The Dutch side under new manager Dick Advocaat are going up and down.
They played crap against Norway and Norway derserved the 2-1 win, yesterday
against Poland was a different thing. Hans van Breukelen dicided to stop
playing for the national team and Advocaat choose Stanley Menzo and the
new goal-keeper, ofcourse Stanley plays for Ajax (Advocaat fancies Ajax :-(((.
The problem with Stanley is that he can't stand the pressure, always in
important games he makes mistakes (the ones yoy see DAve Beasant make).
Yesterday was the same, he made a terrible mistake wich let in the first
Polish goal and he also looked dodgy when the put in the second one just
minutes later. After that there was only one team on the pitch ie Holland.
In Injury time Peter van Vossen made 1-2 and with only 1 minute gone in the
second half van Vossen put 2-2 on the score-board. In the second half Poland
had one change trough Wlodie Smolarek (FC UTRECHT :_)))))) and Holland had
a least 15, both van Basten and Bergkamp were not on target and put the ball
wide of the goal or against the goal-keeper.
I think it will be a heck of a battle to qualify for the USA in 1994 'cause
all teams are strong except San Marino.
T_
|
129.102 | Names of players but thats all... | VAXVLS::CCASEY | | Thu Oct 15 1992 17:57 | 4 |
| Re. -2 you say that Taylor knows the names of his players well i'm
afraid thats all he knows...
Colin...
|
129.103 | | ARRODS::OHAGANB | Said you came from Memphis | Thu Oct 15 1992 17:59 | 21 |
| I find it hard to believe that there are England fans out there
who really do expect us to crush the likes of Norway or walk away
with a qualifying group. Even before Norway's World Cup campaign
they showed their ability by beating the Italians in the Euro '92
qualifiers.
The only team we are expected to crush in the group is San Marino.
Turkey? I remember a very uninspiring England team upstaged by a
Turkish side in possession of superior passing skills during the
Euro '92 qualifiers. And most people in here should be aware of how
difficult the Poles can be so expect the customary tough match in
Poland where we scrape through, just.
Only when style, promised last night, is matched by consistency
can we really begin to compare ourselves with the likes of the
Germans. Until then, forget it.
barry.
|
129.104 | Not only Stanley !!!! | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Thu Oct 15 1992 18:12 | 12 |
| re -????Ton
You say it right, Ton. Holland had dozens of chances, but the ball just
didn't want to roll in. And the two goals from Poland cannot be put on
Menzo's account, only. The defense in total was a shame.....
I remember when van Breukelen had his first games and made some
remarkable faults.......and then everyone was crying for another.
Menzo showed with Ajax that he can't stand the nerves !
And ofcourse Advocaat favours Ajax, seeing last years result. The only
problem is that you can't play Ajax' system with a lot of footballers
from other clubs.
But it will be very very hard for the Dutch to reach the USA now.....
|
129.105 | Excellent note Barry.... | KBOMFG::TANNER | We're one, but we're not the same | Thu Oct 15 1992 18:12 | 10 |
| re .103...
I couldn't agree with you more. I seen that game live v Turkey at Wembley
and the Turks were basically in total control. The only thing they didn't do
was score. They will give a few teams headaches...
Anyway Iam glad there's an English fan out there who knows what he's talking
about.
-dave-
|
129.106 | | PEKING::NAGLEJ | | Thu Oct 15 1992 18:23 | 4 |
|
Brown nose.
JN.
|
129.107 | | PEKING::JOLLYL | Viva la rock .... the killer lives on | Thu Oct 15 1992 21:16 | 12 |
|
Ton,
how dare you enter a note in here I thought this was the England/slag
Enlgand note, stuff off Holland, get out now.
By the way did you know that Andy did the dirty and got married in
Florida a couple of weeks ago, see you in 31,
Loz.
ps :-)
|
129.108 | WELL DONE | MACNAS::SMORAN | | Thu Oct 15 1992 23:44 | 8 |
| Just like to add my tuppence. IMO England played very well last night,
they created chances and were also confident on the ball. Nine out of
ten times they would probably have won 3 nil. But they will play a lot
worse and still win some matches. As regards Taylor V Charlton -
Charlton has forgotton more about football than Taylor ever Knew.
Enough said.
Stephen
|
129.109 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Fri Oct 16 1992 13:13 | 24 |
| <<< Note 129.107 by PEKING::JOLLYL "Viva la rock .... the killer lives on" >>>
>> Ton,
>> how dare you enter a note in here I thought this was the England/slag
>> Enlgand note, stuff off Holland, get out now.
As the Dutch reincarnation of Vinnie I really feel at home here.
>> By the way did you know that Andy did the dirty and got married in
>> Florida a couple of weeks ago, see you in 31,
Whot a bugger, I spoke to him just before he left and he never mentioned it,
I'll give him a bell today see how he's doing. I feel sorry for Emma ;_)))))
>> Loz.
T_
>> ps :-)
pps :-) :-) :-)
|
129.110 | Taylor's Dummy | ESSB::BLONG | I Was There on the Stretford End | Fri Oct 16 1992 16:04 | 5 |
129.111 | no brain | BUNTY::MISTRY | | Fri Oct 16 1992 16:52 | 7 |
|
Taylor doesn't seem to have many grey cells left.
Bipin.
PS he's waiting for the return of John Barnes....
|
129.112 | result | XSTACY::KMCGRATH | Long road, patient donkey | Thu Oct 29 1992 14:57 | 5 |
| Turkey 4 San Marino 1
Turks got 3 in the last 4 minutes
|
129.113 | Turks roast opposition | DBOT07::RUSSELL | | Thu Nov 12 1992 17:34 | 9 |
| and apparently the Turkish fans again disgraced themselves...
like they did against us last year.
UEFA should wise up to these people ...make the Turks play their homes
someplace else....lets see ...YES ..make them play in Greece.
Now that'd be really turning the screw.. he he!
*Tiger*
|
129.114 | Palmer is a great defender *not*.. | VAXVLS::CCASEY | Liverpool now and forever.. | Tue Nov 17 1992 12:29 | 13 |
| I see that the mighty Carlton Palmer is in the English team again with
all the good defenders in engerland and Taylor has to pick some one who
admitted to the press "that he makes no excuses for his lack of skill"
and then went on to say he "has a great work rate but that there is no
one to benefit from it" what a load of c@#p. Palmer is going to give
great enjoyment for non-engerlanders who will watch his gallant attempt
to "act" as a defender. With a bit of luck Taylor will keep playing
him so that buy the end of these qualifiers England will be
deservedly(sp) out of the World Cup, Taylor will resign and England
will become the minnows of world soccer.
Colin..
^^^^^^^
|
129.115 | The Great Glenn | FORTY2::FOWLERM | | Tue Nov 17 1992 15:24 | 9 |
| Personally I think failing to qualify for the world cup would be a mixed blessing
for the English:
BAD because we don't get to take part (obviously).
GOOD because Graham Taylor would get sacked and be replaced by the mighty Glenn
Hoddle.
Mike
|
129.116 | England to STUFF Turkey.... | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Tue Nov 17 1992 16:15 | 17 |
|
Well England are back on the World Cup trail tomorrow with a game
against Turkey nothing but a win will do I expect England to win
easily with Shearer and Wright both producing the goods...
If the papers are anything to go by there will only be one change
Palmer coming in for the injured Batty.....
So I'm going to stick my neck out and go for a score of a least
4-0,
Shrearer 2
Wright 1
Gazza 1
Neil.......
|
129.117 | England team | FORTY2::ASH | Grahame Ash @REO | Tue Nov 17 1992 16:15 | 14 |
|
Woods
Dixon
Pearce
Palmer
Walker
Adams
Platt
Gascoigne
Shearer
Wright
Ince
Subs to be named tomorrow.
|
129.118 | Is the game been played in Istanbul??????? | KBOMFG::TANNER | We're one, but we're not the same | Tue Nov 17 1992 18:32 | 9 |
|
If the game is in Istanbul then a draw wouldn't be a bad result, and a
win for the Turks would be no way a surprise, their supporters are fanatical
and sometimes dangerous... Is the game on SKY???? and if so what time????
Remember the Turkish side in Wembley back in 91???? They played England of
the park but suffered from stage fright in front of goals.
-dave-
|
129.119 | | PAKORA::JJACK | | Wed Nov 18 1992 01:33 | 6 |
|
Prediction time !!!!!!
1-1...and Taylor's job is once more on the line !!
|
129.120 | Spain, get ready for a neck ache.. | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Wed Nov 18 1992 10:44 | 16 |
|
England will win 3-0
Shearer
Platt
Gazza..
Englands bubble is going to burst tonight and show the world
that we mean business once again. I'm confident that England
will be the only British side to win tonight, Scotland will
be lucky to get anything out of their game against Italy, and
Ireland, need we say any more about those clowns..
Andy..B
|
129.121 | | CHEFS::HOUSEB | | Wed Nov 18 1992 11:20 | 5 |
| With all due respect Andy, Ireland are not a British team they are an
Irish team, in the same way Barry McGuigan was Irish until he won
something and Lennox Lewis was Canadian until he won something.
Brian.
|
129.122 | Turkey Unstuffed.. | VAXVLS::CCASEY | Liverpool now and forever.. | Wed Nov 18 1992 11:33 | 6 |
| Well if the result of the U21 's is anything to go by
England 0 - 1 Turkey well done turkey is all i can say..
Colin..
^^^^^^^
|
129.123 | | TRUCKS::SANT | But sir, it's *supposed* to do that! | Wed Nov 18 1992 12:22 | 4 |
|
> well done turkey is all i can say..
If only....
|
129.124 | A pint of Guinesss | AYOV27::SALLEN | | Wed Nov 18 1992 13:27 | 7 |
| REL.121
Like Bernie Slaven, Ray Houghton, Tommy Coyne are Irish - until they
cannot win something 8-)
... Stevie
|
129.125 | Just to even it up | SIOG::BRADLEY | | Wed Nov 18 1992 13:35 | 4 |
| re -1
What about John Barnes and Butcher. They were not born in the UK.
|
129.126 | ENGAGE BRAIN BEFORE PEN | DBOT07::RUSSELL | | Wed Nov 18 1992 13:37 | 18 |
| This 'Irish people suddenly becoming British when they achieve
something' thing really sunk home the other night when I was watching
Coronation Street on the box. Martin Platt ( the prat) called
Oscar Wilde an Englishman. Ye Gods.
BTW, if "JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE" and the Irish are "clowns",
then I don't know what to say about the person who disgraced this
conference last summer when he made comments about Terry Yorath and
his son, who died at the age of 12.
You'd *NEVER* find an Irish supporter that would lower himself to
those obvious rascist SHED depths. One of the main reasons why I left
the Chelsea note was because I did'nt like the company of certain
other noters.
Nuff Said.
*Tiger*
|
129.127 | Good Luck | DBOT07::RUSSELL | | Wed Nov 18 1992 13:42 | 8 |
| I'd also like to wish England good luck against Turkey tonight. Based
on the u-21 score , they're gonna need it. Maybe the Turks won't
bottle in front of goal like they did in 1991.
Sincerely, I hope England qualify for 94...I want Ireland to face them
in the USA.
*Tiger*
|
129.128 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Wed Nov 18 1992 13:45 | 7 |
|
I'm sure Terry Yoraths son was more than 12 when he died, may be
you have yours and his age mixed up..
Andy..B
|
129.129 | | PEKING::NAGLEJ | | Wed Nov 18 1992 14:00 | 19 |
|
Andy. Does it really make a difference how old Terry Yoraths son
was ?
On the Irish/English thing. Going by the few notes I've read so far
it looks like turning ugly unlike the Rangers/Leeds banter we had
a short while back.
Before it does go any further perhaps its a good idea that its knocked
on the head now before it does get stupid.
As far as Ireland and England are concerned I get the best of both
worlds. I cheer them both on. I was born in this country but my whole
family before me (1932 and before) are Irish. I'm not sure though which
team I feel closer too. I am glad that both teams are in different
groups for this World Cup.
JN.
|
129.130 | To feel is to breathe..to breathe is to live. | DBOT07::RUSSELL | | Wed Nov 18 1992 14:10 | 15 |
|
>>I'm sure Terry Yoraths son was more than 12 when he died, may be
>>you have yours and his age mixed up..
I'm not certain Andy, all I know is he was a son to his mother and father
and I'm sure his loss wounded them deeply.
Can you understand those feelings of sympathy? More importantly, do
you have any conception of the pain they went/are going through?
Perhaps the number 12 entered my head when I thought about the
I.Q. rating of the Shed. No, not the average I.Q., the *SUM* of
all I.Q.s on the Shed.
*Tiger*
|
129.131 | | SUBURB::WAITEG | WE HATE WEST HAM | Wed Nov 18 1992 14:30 | 9 |
| Tiger
I understand what you are saying about most of fans in the Shed being
thick. (You have to be to support Chelsea), but you can't crictise all
Chelsea fans because of about 100 or so twats. Most Chelsea fans, like
Millwall fans go to watch the match and not to sing songs which are sick,
about certain events.
Gary
|
129.132 | But but but its ah true.. | VAXVLS::CCASEY | Liverpool now and forever.. | Wed Nov 18 1992 14:45 | 18 |
| I hope England do well tonight
*************** NOT ***********
its about time England got a good kick in the A$#@ and not qualifying
for the World Cup could do the trick. The major thing wrong with the
English Team is that slimy creep Taylor if only he could admit when
England play crap, if only he could resign and let a decent manager in
but no that would be to smart instead he'll keep picking crap teams
i.e. by chopping and changing all the time just because the team does
not play well on its first outing together. I really believe that I
wouldn't hate England as much if Taylor wasn't around..
But even with a new manager I still
would not want them to win.. come on the Turks..
Colin..
^^^^^^^
|
129.133 | | TRUCKS::SANT | But sir, it's *supposed* to do that! | Wed Nov 18 1992 14:50 | 6 |
|
....... ,,,,,,,, just add where appropriate.
Thank you for your comments, I'm very grateful.
Andy.
|
129.134 | 2nd rate | MADBAS::DREES | Relegation....?? | Wed Nov 18 1992 15:02 | 9 |
|
When will all English fans realise that the problem is not that you have
a dumplin' as a manager. The real problem lies in the fact that, like
Scotland, you have no international class players.
Wake up boys......if you don't have the players what can you do ?
Del.
|
129.135 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Well Des, it was a bit of a bobbler.... | Wed Nov 18 1992 15:10 | 9 |
|
> you have no international class players.
Gazza, Pearce, Walker and Platt? But anyway 4 good players doesn't make
a good team and I admit that we're crap at the moment
and everybody hates us!! ;-(
Tim
|
129.136 | Yes Sir.. | VAXVLS::CCASEY | Liverpool now and forever.. | Wed Nov 18 1992 16:09 | 6 |
| re. .133
Well at least I'm getting there next time i'll try to do better Sir..
Colin..
^^^^^^^
|
129.137 | What time's K.O? | NEWOA::BURTON | | Wed Nov 18 1992 16:39 | 4 |
|
What time's the K.O for tonight's England V Turkey game??
Nige.
|
129.138 | | FORTY2::ASH | Grahame Ash @REO | Wed Nov 18 1992 16:46 | 3 |
| 8.00 at Wembley tonight, live on Sky (spit!) and highlights on BBC1 later.
g
|
129.139 | Cheers... | NEWOA::BURTON | | Wed Nov 18 1992 17:48 | 6 |
|
RE:-1
Cheers Grahame.
Nige.
|
129.140 | Platt and Wright. | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Wed Nov 18 1992 18:18 | 7 |
|
England to win 2-0 tonight,and so P*ssing off all the anti English
Mc and O'Noters out there.
Were on our way to the States...
Dave...
|
129.141 | One non-english supporter who won't be p*ssed off if they win | SIOG::BRADLEY | | Wed Nov 18 1992 19:07 | 14 |
|
Dave,
That's a bad attitude to have. It's not that we dislike the England
team, it's the way you rate them that they are in the Top 10 teams in
the world. At the moment they are not.
They have alot of good skillful individual players who play well at
club football but as a team they are unbalanced. Wheather this is
down to the manager we'll only know when you get rid of him.
Gary....
|
129.142 | Is Andy B related to David Duke? | SIOG::BUCKLEY | Manchester - Championship Free Zone | Wed Nov 18 1992 19:22 | 6 |
|
Like most of my fellow Celts, I'll be shouting for the Turks tonight
for two reasons
1. Graham Failure, whose team plays crap football despite Gazza,
Shearer, Wright, Walker & Woods
2. Racists like "Andy..B"
|
129.143 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Well Des, it was a bit of a bobbler.... | Wed Nov 18 1992 19:58 | 8 |
|
re 29.142
..... you forgot:
3. The 500 years of oppression, discrimination, etc, etc ;-)
Tim (Not even English according to Billy Bingham)
|
129.144 | Top ten? No worries | FORTY2::FOWLERM | | Wed Nov 18 1992 19:59 | 24 |
| I think England do have the potential to be in the top 10 national sides in the
world, but we are hindered by our domestic schedule. (yawn...tired old subject)
If we cut down the number of games we play in domestic competitions, which could
be achieved by abandoning some of the poor cup competitions, and appointed Sir
Glenn Hoddle as manager we'd be up there with the best.
We certainly have the players:
Gascoigne, Lineker (I'm sure he'd play again for Glenn), Waddle (likewise),
Barnes, Salako, Platt, Walker, Pearce, Wright, Shearer, et. al.
Not to mention such potential superstars as Kevin Richardson, Dalian Atkinson,
Shaun Teale, Tony Daley, and Nigel Clough.
Unfortunately at the moment we don't play as well as we perhaps should. At the
moment I think the Republic are a superior side, and all credit to Big Jack
for that. They deserved to beat us both times in the European qualifiers, and
I'm sure they would have done a better job once they'd got there.
That said, I predict England will win 1-0 tonight, and David Platt will be the
scorer. Isn't he always?
Mike
|
129.145 | Lame Excuse | ESSB::BLONG | Europe is Scouse Free | Wed Nov 18 1992 20:12 | 8 |
129.146 | | WOTVAX::SHAW27::WATTERSONP | Everton Everton rah rah rah | Thu Nov 19 1992 00:50 | 11 |
| Final score..... Att 42,000 ish
England 4-0 Turkey
Gascoigne
Shearer
Pearce
Gascoigne
Paul
|
129.147 | | WOTVAX::SHAW27::WATTERSONP | Everton Everton rah rah rah | Thu Nov 19 1992 00:55 | 10 |
|
Latest score from Spain
Spain 0-0 Ireland
Spain have just had a player sent off
60 mins gone
Paul
|
129.148 | AT LEAST SOMEONE CAN WIN.. | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Thu Nov 19 1992 09:35 | 18 |
|
Paul Gascoigne put England back on the tracks for the world cup
last night scoring two brilliant goals. England seemed to be looking
at another bad night when Turkey hit the bar, but Gazza took
the gobble out of Turkey when he scored his first after 16 minutes
and then set up Wright who crossed to Shearer for the second
with a diving header. Stuart Pearce scored the third from a
free-kick in the second half and then Des walker with a great
run, set up Gazza who rounded the keeper and then finished
the Turks off...
ENGLAND AND GAZZA ARE BACK....
Andy..B
|
129.149 | That'll do Nicely... | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Nov 19 1992 11:32 | 10 |
|
The best England performance under Graham Taylor.A good game with all
the England side playing well,obviously Gascoigne but Ince,
Dixon and Wright stood out for me.Wright had an excellent game and a
goal will surely come against San Marino.
A good win that will help the goals for column,with another two points
v San Marino in Febuary,that will set up up nicely for the more testing
games v Holland,Poland and Norway.
Dave...
|
129.150 | Gascoigne=PURE GENIUS.. | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Thu Nov 19 1992 13:49 | 9 |
|
Nothing much to add a great performance from a side thats starting
to ooze confidence and quality...Quality performance....
If Gascoigne carries on playing like this the tag of "Greatest
Footballer in the World" will be his........
Neil..
|
129.151 | Turkey already stuffed for Xmas | BIBROK::ROBERTSON | Ain't it marvelous | Thu Nov 19 1992 14:11 | 25 |
| Who was the Turkish No. 7
His free kick at the beginning of the second half should go down as was
of the greatest not to have gone in.
For those who didn't see it, he struck the ball as sweetly as any
Multi-Million rated player from at least 40 Yards, forcing Woods into a great
save.
That would have been a hell of a way for Turkey to score their first goal
against England ( Agg. Score now 27-0 )
A very good performance last night. It would appear that Graham Failure has
finally found the core for a good team. I still think the team needs a couple
more quality players to be serious contenders. Even though every player put in
a good showing, I think Palmer & Adams could come unstuck against better
quality opposition.
Gazza has definitely returned to the international scene in style. Every time
he got the ball he looked dangerous.
As mentioned on Sportsnight, I agree that Shearer's goal was one of the best
goals scored by England in a long time.
Al
|
129.152 | ????? | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | Hey Home, to Bel Air | Thu Nov 19 1992 15:39 | 6 |
|
Erm, Mr Casey, come in Mr Casey......
Tony
|
129.153 | Well Done.............*NOT* *NOT* ha ha | VAXVLS::CCASEY | Liverpool now and forever.. | Thu Nov 19 1992 17:06 | 33 |
| Comments:
Yes hello I'm here with Match comments.
I did say that Palmer was C@#p and even he admitted before the match in
as many words. He's just a long string of misery who gets in the way
all the time. To the naked eye last nigh the proved me right he's
useless surely there is a better defender than him in England. As for
Adams the donkey what can I say he should be put back out in the field
to graze. Poor lad has not been the same since he was locked away.
How can I put this Gazza is *NOT* the best player in the world and has
a long way to go yet before he can fit into the shoe's of the previous
world bests. I'll be the first to admit he's a great player but he has
a lot of maturing to do yet.
I can't retract my comments on Mr. Taylor he's still a creep and always
will be and the sooner he quits the better.
Another point just as well Turkey didn't score just one of there Golden
opportunities else the game would have taken a whole different twist.
I must say though Well Done yee have beaten
the World No.1 team Turkey so give yourselves a good pat on the back
and enjoy life because it could be a whole different ball game when yee
meet the Mighty Dutch and Polish..
Cheers chaps..
Colin..
^^^^^^^
|
129.154 | | WOTVAX::SHAW27::WATTERSONP | Everton Everton rah rah rah | Thu Nov 19 1992 17:13 | 6 |
|
Re .153
You're not English then ?
Paul
|
129.155 | ah, but what if Gazzcoin gets injured..? | DBOT07::RUSSELL | | Thu Nov 19 1992 18:38 | 14 |
| C'mon Casey....outta here back to 130 now!!!
Let them enjoy their moment of pleasure....It'll give them something to
look back on when we're in the USA and they're in front of the telly,
watching the rest of the World and the IRISH enjoying W.C. 94
I'm just waiting to see what happens when one of those Italian
Stallion defenders decides to crease Mr Gascoigne's bum over the
stand.
I wonder how well will England play then....?
*Tiger*
|
129.156 | We'll need some rope to pull him out | SIOG::BRADLEY | | Thu Nov 19 1992 18:42 | 7 |
|
>> I'm just waiting to see what happens when one of those Italian
>> Stallion defenders decides to crease Mr Gascoigne's bum over the
>> stand.
I hope not because that fine Italian Stallion will get lost in
all that blubber.
|
129.157 | It's started already. | MADBAS::DSMITH | ONE THOMAS BROLIN... | Thu Nov 19 1992 18:46 | 14 |
|
Come now chaps, aren't you all getting a little carried away(as usual)
A scraped 1-1 draw against a 2nd rate team, and a home win against a
team whose defence was full of holes. Once you play well against
quality sides then you can start bragging. As for the big bubble-head,
he was given 2 goals on a plate. He's hardly set the game on fire in
Italy, wonder why that is? OH, he's up against quality players every
week. What a waste of money and headlines!!!!
Danny.
ps Just to prove I'm not totally against Engerland, I thought Shearer's
goal last night was a bit special.
|
129.158 | ho ho | FORTY2::ETHERIDGE | Lampshade | Thu Nov 19 1992 19:26 | 5 |
| What satisfying reading this note is. A nice place for the 'other' people
of these islands to have a whinge. Well balanced fellas, to a man; chips
on *both* shoulders.
Ian.
|
129.159 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Fri Nov 20 1992 11:00 | 8 |
|
Lets face it, most of thses replies only mean one thing..
You wish that you were English, well your not, so get in
your kilts or get your Leprechaun uniform on..
|
129.160 | | SIOG::BRADLEY | | Fri Nov 20 1992 12:02 | 12 |
|
> Lets face it, most of thses replies only mean one thing..
>
>
> You wish that you were English, well your not, so get in
> your kilts or get your Leprechaun uniform on..
I don't know how you make that one out ??
|
129.161 | Moderate your ardour | ISEPUB::CHAMPOLLION | Can-tas-tic | Fri Nov 20 1992 12:57 | 6 |
| Can you please put an end to this boring Scottish-English banter? The world
is not interested.
Thanks
JF Mod.
|
129.162 | | PEKING::NAGLEJ | | Fri Nov 20 1992 13:33 | 32 |
|
The English team have every reason to feel pleased about the way
they played Wednesday Evening.
So what if Turkey are a third rate team ? They are much better then
they used to be and can play football.
The difference between England now and the Euro Champs, apart from
the inclusion of Gazza, is simply that the team couldn't win against
third rate teams but the story is different now. So any third rate
team (and if this is to include Turkey) should be put in their place
by an England team who hopefully is starting to get it together.
Therefore the team can be pleased for itself and the fans can join in
as well as it looks like teams that England should win against will be
defeated.
For the game itself I thought England were lucky in the first 15
minutes and a goal from Turkey here could have altered the game
dramatically.
I couldn't believe Wright was so unlucky. He played well and played
a great part in the attacking performance with more or less all of his
attempts on goal being on target.
Palmer and Adams shouldn't be in there, especially Palmer. That is one
change Taylor will have to make IMO.
JN.
|
129.163 | Gazza Mania hits ENGLAND, AGAIN!!! | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Fri Nov 20 1992 13:49 | 48 |
|
re:1
Good, lets get some sanity back to this note.......
The Gazza bandwagon roles on with all the papers down here having
at least two pages on the Genius, love him or hate him he really
has put the smile back into English football.....
Here are some facts and figures on Gazza's remarkable game against
Turkey
PASSES ON TARGET..................41
PASSES OFF TARGET.................7
FOULS COMMITTED...................0
FOULS ON HIM......................1
SUCCESSFUL TACKLES................1
UNSUCCESSFUL TACKLES..............0
TACKLED IN POSSESSION.............1
LOST CONTROL OF BALL..............4
CORNERS TAKEN.....................10
FREE-KICKS TAKEN..................2
HEADERS...........................4
CROSSES...........................1
SHOTS OFF TARGET..................0
SHOTS ON TARGET...................2
GOALS.............................2
Here are some quotes from his team mates who help Gazza to these
impressive statistics.
Paul Ince : 'WE FEEL WE'LL BEAT ANYONE WITH HIM'
Lee Dixon: 'JUST TO LOOK AT GAZZA IN THE WARM-UP GIVES YOU A LIFT'
Alan Shearer: "People say he's replaceable but he's not. He's a
natural, a one off"
THE MANAGER:
Graham Taylor: 'I'LL BUILD MY TEAM ROUND HIM'
all printed without premission from the GAZZA RAG..
If I've got a bit more time I'll enter more quotes from Gazza's
England team mates....
Rgds
Neil...
|
129.164 | I'm famous I am | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | Hey Home, to Bel Air | Fri Nov 20 1992 15:37 | 6 |
|
Off the beat and track, I got a fax printed in the Sun today.
Tony
|
129.165 | | CHEFS::HOUSEB | | Fri Nov 20 1992 15:37 | 6 |
| Neil,
A touch of cunnovitus perhaps or maybe a manky old fishing rod with a
huge amount of quality bait on the end of it.
Brian
|
129.166 | | SUBURB::WAITEG | WE HATE WEST HAM | Fri Nov 20 1992 16:39 | 6 |
| Re 164
Tony what are you doing reading the Sun, when all these years you
claimed to be a Socialist.
Gary
|
129.167 | ZZZZzzzzzz ;^) | UNTADH::WILCOCKSON | Brrrrrrr | Fri Nov 20 1992 18:48 | 7 |
| >>
>> If I've got a bit more time I'll enter more quotes from Gazza's
>> England team mates....
>>
I can't wait!
|
129.168 | England haven't won the WC yet | SALES::THILL | | Mon Nov 23 1992 19:43 | 11 |
| I find a lot of the England wind-ups both annoying and amusing. England
and their fans ought to be pleased with a 4-0 win, especially since
these are the games that they would squeak out with an 85th minute goal
for a 1-0 win in the past.
As for this "England are the greatest team on earth and have already
WON the World Cup" nonsense, keep in mind the Norway game, and that the
qualifaication rounds have barely started. 2 games each against Holland
and Poland will tell the story.
Tom
|
129.169 | | PEKING::NAGLEJ | | Mon Nov 23 1992 19:46 | 11 |
|
Thanks Tom. Its about time these England supporters were put
in their place.
England, greatest team on earth ?? Pah, what nonsense.
I love Scotland. Scotland for the world cup. Or Ireland, whoevers
winning.
JN.
|
129.170 | Case not proven | GALVIA::SPAIN | There's always the U.S. | Mon Nov 23 1992 21:01 | 23 |
|
I find the reaction to the Turkey game incredible. Yes, it was a great
win. Yes Gazza is a very talented player but many of his team-mates
are mediocre.
Turkey are not world beaters. They scored once in the European
championship qualifers and lost every game. They were drawing 1-1 with
San Marino with 3 minutesleft in Ankara. England will also thump San
Marino but Holland will be the real test.
As for Gazza, well football needs heroes. Gazza has bags of talent and
he excites. People come just to watch him. Because of this we can
forgive him a lot of the idiotic stuff. He may well carry England
through to the World Cup finals. Ireland don't have a Gazza. We don't
have a player that can produce that kind of magic. Our best player is
a centre-half. We do however have a team and we can survive the loss
of some of our star players. Ireland have already gone and drawn with
Denmark in Copenhagen and with Spain in Seville. Indeed we should have
won in Seville. Effectively England are a point down having drawn with
Norway at Wembley. Holland are also struggling. There's a long way to
go yet.
Gary.
|
129.171 | Youths Int. :ROI 3 - 3 NI | VAXVLS::CCASEY | Liverpool now and forever.. | Wed Nov 25 1992 11:32 | 1 |
|
|
129.172 | The Big Boy Cries Again | ESSB::BLONG | Europe is Scouse Free | Mon Nov 30 1992 21:29 | 8 |
129.173 | Poland could stop us again | FORTY2::ASH | Grahame Ash @REO | Tue Dec 01 1992 13:31 | 7 |
| Friendly result:
Uruguay 0 Poland 1
Still a hell of a lot to do for England . . .
g
|
129.174 | | PEKING::NAGLEJ | | Tue Dec 01 1992 16:06 | 29 |
|
Re ESSB::BLONG
You have to appreciate what this local derby means to the Roma
and Lazio supporters especially since there is only a couple of
points seperating the two teams.
The Italians are fanatical about their football, as you well know.
The sheer number of fans attending serie A games is quite fantastic
and they treat their star players like Gods.
So, if Gazza equalises in the 86th minute of a local derby when
feelings are running high along with the tension AND its also his
first LEAGUE goal for Lazio then I believe his emotions are entitled
to get the better of him. My opinion isn't based on the fact that he
plays for England as that doesn't matter, he could be Irish, Welsh or
Scottish.
Most men won't cry in public through fear of being called a softy,
nancy boy or whatever and because boys don't cry and daddy told them
off for crying when they were a kid.
One sign of being a man is not being afraid to cry. Woman quite like
it in a way as it shows men do have feelings.
So, sob sob, there.
JN. )
|
129.175 | The tears of a clown...:-( :-( | BUSSTP::DSMITH | ONE THOMAS BROLIN... | Tue Dec 01 1992 16:42 | 16 |
|
I wonder what gushing Gazza will do if he actually wins something with
his club or country. After all, he burst into tears when he got booked
playing for Engerland, now he's at it again after scoring 1 goal for
Lazio, and he was still bubbling like a baby 20 minutes after the game.
I think I'll give this Saturdays's Gazzetta on Channel 4 a miss. I
don't have enough supplies of Klennex to go round.
Danny.
ps On the subject of channel 4, wasn't it simply spiffingly marvellous
to here Ray Wilkins and that other un-biased commentator heaping praise
on the fat-boy on Sunday. The fact that they were watching and
commentating on a different game doesn't matter, they've just got to
get onto their knees and praise the over-rated one!!
|
129.176 | Give the lad a chance!!!!!! | KBOMFG::TANNER | We're one, but we're not the same | Tue Dec 01 1992 17:23 | 8 |
|
Lads go easy on Gazzer, after all his diet consists of jelly beans and
mars bars.... and babys tend to cry no matter what the situation is!!!!!
a gu gu gu!!!!!!!!!
-dave-
|
129.177 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Tue Dec 01 1992 17:31 | 5 |
|
Anyone who thinks Gazza is rubbish only means one thing!!!
Your either Scottish, Irish or just plain jealous
|
129.178 | Andy can't ya read???????? | KBOMFG::TANNER | We're one, but we're not the same | Tue Dec 01 1992 17:45 | 5 |
|
Andy I didnt say he was rubbish, I just said he was a baby!!!!! Are ye by
any chance related!!!!!
-dave
|
129.179 | | BUSSTP::DSMITH | ONE THOMAS BROLIN... | Tue Dec 01 1992 18:04 | 8 |
|
I didnae say he's rubbish, just vastly over-rated.
Danny.
ps I'm not Scottish, Irish, Welsh, nor am I jealous of a fat turd
like Gazza!!!!!
|
129.180 | Whats this someone has let a baby into notes... | VAXVLS::CCASEY | Liverpool now and forever.. | Tue Dec 01 1992 20:01 | 16 |
| Re. -3
God those lines sound familiar I wonder where I heard them. Anyway
now one said he was rubbish. They just said he's a big baby and by the
way you carry on sometimes wonder if ye are related(Well are ye). Its
not his fault he cries all the time. I know he wants to be in the
headlines all the time but by scoring against Roma he probably would
have he didn't have to go overboard by crying. Players scoring in
their first World Cup Final wouldn't react like he did only you would
understand it a bit more if they did.
Again as regards him being rubbish his goal was brill. but for the rest
of the match he was out of it..
Colin..
^^^^^^^
|
129.181 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Well Des, it was a bit of a bobbler.... | Tue Dec 01 1992 20:17 | 6 |
|
Gazza's a very emotional person and cannot hide his feelings. There's
nothing too wrong with that. I like him all the more for it. He's a
very genuine person and a typical Geordie.
Tim
|
129.182 | | PEKING::NAGLEJ | | Tue Dec 01 1992 20:18 | 13 |
|
If Gazza wants to cry then let him. There is obviously *very*
few people who understand his burning desire to play and what
playing football actually means to him along with winning and
scoring goals and displaying his *RARE* talent.
He loves the big occasion and Italian football is the ideal
stage for him. He loves to please people and nothing gives him
more pleasure than making people happy. I seriously doubt he
gives a toss about the headlines so therefore he doesn't grab
them intentionaly.
JN.
|
129.183 | Eric does not cry he changes clubs | JRDV04::CHAMPOLLION | | Wed Dec 02 1992 08:07 | 10 |
| The story goes he was still crying 20 minutes after the end of the
game, in the locker room.
I suppose there was too much emotion, after 16 months injured and
several trillions Lire later, to score his first in the local derby was
just too much.
I don't care if he cries or moans I like his class. You can't beat
Cantona for temper though.
JF
|
129.184 | | PEKING::NAGLEJ | | Wed Dec 02 1992 13:55 | 4 |
|
Paul Walsh has a temper about him. Just ask Ray Clemence.
JN.
|
129.185 | | TRUCKS::SANT | But sir, it's *supposed* to do that! | Wed Dec 02 1992 15:48 | 16 |
|
Gazza is hyped beyond all proportion, and we're glad he's playing
for us!! I'm sure he could have unearthed some convaluted reason
for playing for Wales/Scotland/Ireland/N.Ireland.. .;-)
So many very gifted players are not English. We have too many average
players playing international football right now.
But we still, and will continue to, support them and take all this
anti-English stuff on the chin. I know we're NOT the greatest
in the galaxy but it won't stop us wanting and trying to be...
I don't expect you all to agree with me. I'd be amazed if you
did 8-)
Andy.
|
129.186 | AMERICA here we come !! | ELIS::GEELEN | | Thu Dec 17 1992 11:38 | 15 |
129.187 | Van who | MACNAS::CWALSH | A goal a day keeps relegation away | Thu Dec 17 1992 12:38 | 6 |
| Who is Van Vossen ???
Never heard of him before, what club does he play for ???
Was Bergkamp playing, surely he'd have scored if he was playing.
Colm.
|
129.188 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Well Des, it was a bit of a bobbler.... | Thu Dec 17 1992 13:00 | 5 |
|
Did Eric Viscaal play? and if so, how did he? (Newcastle may be buying
him).
Tim,
|
129.189 | Gullits back and so are the Dutch.. | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Dec 17 1992 13:18 | 14 |
|
I saw the game on SKY last night.Very good result for Holland without
Van Basten and Bergkamp.Turkey as usual were full of good Football
until they got antwhere near the goal.
Holland dont look good defensivly but Turkey wernt good enough to take
advantage of it.
The commentators thought the score flattered Holland,but it doesnt
matter really they got the points and are right back in the group.
Really England should beat Turkey in Turkey,we keep getting told what a
up and coming side they are but they arent very good.
Dave...
|
129.190 | Van Vossen | PLAYER::LESOIL | | Thu Dec 17 1992 14:43 | 15 |
|
Re .- a few back
<< Who is Van Vossen ???
<< Never heard of him before, what club does he play for ???
He's in Belgium for a few years now. He was playing for Beveren last
Year, and for Anderlecht this year.
Unfortunately he's not always playing as good for his team than for
Holland. I don't think he even managed to score two goals in match
like he's doing with his national team. Really pity because he has
cost a lot.
|
129.191 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Thu Dec 17 1992 16:18 | 14 |
| <<< Note 129.188 by PLUNDR::MORAN "Well Des, it was a bit of a bobbler...." >>>
>> Did Eric Viscaal play? and if so, how did he? (Newcastle may be buying
>> him).
>> Tim,
Tim,
he played and that is the only thing that can be said, he was more on the ground
than he ball but never got a free kick.
T_
|
129.192 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Well Des, it was a bit of a bobbler.... | Thu Dec 17 1992 16:22 | 4 |
|
Thanks Ton. I wonder if Keegan has been 'put off'.
Tim
|
129.193 | Dear Kevin...... | PLUNDR::LOWEG | Blimey thats good !! | Thu Dec 17 1992 16:47 | 6 |
|
Hang on I'll ask him !!!
Gary..
|
129.194 | Table | FORTY2::ASH | Grahame Ash @REO | Thu Dec 17 1992 17:28 | 13 |
| (Time for a sensible reply!)
P W D L F A Pts
Norway 4 3 1 0 15 2 7
England 2 1 1 0 5 1 3
Netherlands 3 1 1 1 6 5 3
Poland 2 1 1 0 3 2 3
Turkey 4 1 0 3 5 9 2
San Marino 3 0 0 3 1 16 0
Next game on 17 Feb: England v San Marino
g
|
129.195 | ouwe lul | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Thu Dec 17 1992 20:44 | 7 |
| rep -1
Grahame,
your too good to be true :-)))))))
T_
|
129.196 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Thu Dec 17 1992 20:46 | 14 |
| <<< Note 129.192 by PLUNDR::MORAN "Well Des, it was a bit of a bobbler...." >>>
>> Thanks Ton. I wonder if Keegan has been 'put off'.
>> Tim
Tim,
I hope for Newcastle he is, 'cause the price for Viscaal is quite high
and I don't he is the kind of player who can get along in the English
League.
T_
|
129.197 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Well Des, it was a bit of a bobbler.... | Mon Dec 21 1992 13:00 | 5 |
129.198 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Mon Feb 15 1993 15:05 | 25 |
|
Should be an avalanche of goals at Wembley this wednesday as
England take on the very good San Marino side.
England side::Woods,Pearce,Walker,Adams,Dixon,Ince,Gazza,Platt,Merson
Barnes,Ferdinand( Wright in place of Merson if fit).
I predict a score line of ENGLAND 12 San Marino 0
Gazza (6) Platt (1) Ince (1) Ferdinand (1) Adams (1) Woods (2)
\
|
129.199 | | TRUCKS::SANT | Nostalgia *is* what it used to be... | Mon Feb 15 1993 15:45 | 11 |
|
I think you might regret that note by Thursday morning, Andy...;-)
I'll settle for 3 or 4 nil..
...to England, of course.
Andy.
|
129.200 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Mon Feb 15 1993 16:04 | 11 |
|
England are bound to score more against San Marino than the Jocks
did, but lets face it the jocks are crap. I see Ireland are playing
Wales also during the week, that should be great game between to
sides who both lack anything to do with football. I suppose Jack
Charlton will come out with another excuse because his side have
drawn yet again and some how never seem to win any.
Sorry but i have changed my mind and I know think the score will
be 14-0 to England with Gazza getting (8)..
|
129.201 | Goals galore at Wembley on Wednesday.. | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Mon Feb 15 1993 16:09 | 30 |
|
Re.199
3 or 4 nil would be dissapointing imo.Goals are needed and England
will never get a better chance to score a hatfull.I saw San Marino play
Norway and Turkey and they are without doubt the worst international
side I have ever seen..(apart from Ireland that is)..They are
dreadfull.
England should play the most attacking line up possible,maybe only
playing 3 at the back to allow for another attacking midfielder.We dont
want them to get in each others way going for goals but two wingers
should do the trick.
Woods
Dixon Walker Pearce
Ince
Gascoigne Platt
Merson Wright Ferdinand Barnes
If Wright doesnt make it then Barnes should play in the middle with
Sharpe on the wing.
I'll go for 8-0.
Dave...
|
129.202 | Who will cuddle Barnes? | WARNUT::TPCASE::PICKERINGS | Simon Pickering | Mon Feb 15 1993 17:01 | 7 |
| >>then Barnes should play in the middle with
Barnes shouldn't play. Period. He's done nothing for England, and even less for
'pool this season.
Stick Brian Deane or Paul Warhurst down the middle; that would really rattle
San Marino.
|
129.203 | Another bad day in VMS land | EBYGUM::WATTERSONP | another day another bill | Mon Feb 15 1993 17:14 | 17 |
|
I can't see what is the fuss is about Ferdinand - is it because he
plays for a London team and was subject to transfer speculation earlier
in the season ?
Okay so he's scored a few goals this season, but he hasn't been a
regular scorer for the last couple of months and the vast majority of
his goals are scored at home.
Even though he's only been playing in Jocko land, I'd rather see Hateley
given a chance again - at least he's been consistant over the last few
years and not some 'here today, gone tomorrow' London player - I'm
surprised that Barmby hasn't been suggested, even if he is a good
player, the way the MOTD commentators rave over him is vomit inducing.
Paul
|
129.204 | Barnes is in..so he plays. | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Mon Feb 15 1993 17:21 | 16 |
|
Paul..
I agree about Hately..I would have liked to see him in the squad and
playing.After all he scored goals when he was a regular for England in
the mid 80's.
Re-2 Barnes
As for Barnes well we have to include him as he is in the squad,I would
much rather see Waddle getting a game,he is in much better form than
Barnes.Graham Taylor has picked his squad and no matter who we would
like to see playing we can only pick players from the squad..so Barnes
plays as its very doubtfull that Taylor has included him in the squad
and not play him.
Dave...
|
129.205 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Mon Feb 15 1993 18:33 | 3 |
|
Hately was o.k in the mid-80's but you have to remember that now
he's playing at a very low level in the Jock league.
|
129.206 | English Premier League - overrated crap | BUSSTP::DSMITH | ONE THOMAS BROLIN... | Mon Feb 15 1993 21:54 | 9 |
|
re last
Maybe he is playing in a so-called low level Jock league, but he
still has the ability to score and make goals. Witness his performance
against the best the sassenachs could offer at Elland Road.
Danny.
|
129.207 | WORLD CUP HERE WE COME........... | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Tue Feb 16 1993 10:25 | 7 |
|
I must admit that leeds are a very poor premier league side and it
didnt suprise me when Rangers beat them. But you must see that Hatley
these days plays in a league of a very low standard and for that
reason should not be put into a side that is filled with superb
talent and world class players, look what happened to Rangers on
saturday.........
|
129.208 | | PEKING::DAVIESG | Think before you think | Tue Feb 16 1993 10:45 | 3 |
| 6-0 : Gazza (3) Ince (1) Platt (1) Ferdinand (1) - About right.
|
129.209 | Rangers beat the best England had to offer | GALVIA::SPAIN | There's always the U.S. | Tue Feb 16 1993 12:15 | 11 |
|
> But you must see that Hatley
>these days plays in a league of a very low standard and for that
>reason should not be put into a side that is filled with superb
>talent and world class players, look what happened to Rangers on
> saturday.........
I take it you're against picking anyone from the English premier league
then.
Gary.
|
129.210 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Tue Feb 16 1993 12:36 | 3 |
|
Dont talk crap! Leeds got handed the league last year, how can
you call them the best in the English league...
|
129.211 | This guy sounds like a Chelsea fan. | ECCGY4::HAIGH | It's worse than that Jim | Tue Feb 16 1993 12:53 | 1 |
|
|
129.212 | Nah, that would be an insult to other genuine Chelsea fans. | KBOMFG::TANNER | We're one, but we're not the same | Tue Feb 16 1993 13:05 | 0 |
129.213 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Tue Feb 16 1993 13:41 | 2 |
|
Why dont you go and chew on haggis
|
129.214 | Such Eloquence..... | UNTADA::BIRSE | Testa OSI Investigation team | Tue Feb 16 1993 14:50 | 6 |
| That's what I like....
Well thought out, constructive criticism :^)...
|
129.215 | Explain your pers name. | ESSB::MCUNNIFFE | Pool-73,76,77,79,80,82-4,86,88,90 | Tue Feb 16 1993 19:11 | 8 |
|
<<< Note 129.213 by PEKING::BAREFIELDA "JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE" >>>
Can you tell me why your personal name reads as it does. What have you
against big Jack?
Cunno
|
129.216 | The Gazza support system. | SHIPS::DURANT_S | | Tue Feb 16 1993 20:27 | 29 |
|
I don't reckon Graham Taylor will change the succesful team pattern he
has found, now Gazza is back. I think he will bring in Ferdinand and
Barnes in as straight replacements for the injured strikers and
encourage the back four to go forward as often as possible.
We need ten goals to overtake Norway's goal difference, but I think we
are more likely to win seven or eight nil.
Expected team:
Woods
Dixon Pearce
Adams Walker
Palmer Ince Platt
Gazza
Ferdinand Barnes
Remember after the Turkey game that Taylor said that the players in
that game were the ones in possesion of their England places.
Steve.
|
129.217 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Wed Feb 17 1993 10:43 | 14 |
|
The England team on sky::Woods
Walker
Dixon
Adams
Dorigo
Palmer
Ince
Gazza
Platt
Ferdinand
Barnes
|
129.218 | | PEKING::DAVIESG | Think before you think | Wed Feb 17 1993 10:51 | 7 |
| re.216;
Platt is being moved into a fully attacking role with Ferdinand,
according to the Express. Also, Ince is doubtful after he rushed home
last night to see his ill son.
GrEg...
|
129.219 | GAZZA'S RECORD !!! | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Wed Feb 17 1993 13:36 | 23 |
|
Great pictures of Gazza in the Sun today with his Gazziator oufit on.
With a great little write up........
ENTER THE GAZZIATOR
SWORD BLIMEY!! Hail Gazza, the warrior preparing to throw San Marino
to the Lions tonight.
England fans will be baying for goals and Paul Gascoigne will be
Roman round Wembley determined to carve up the World Cup minnows.
Let's hope Graham Taylor's GAZZIATOR can rule the show and become
San Marino's Terminator..
Love him or hate him he's a great character and a brilliant
footballer. And if anyone can break Malcolm Macdonald's 5 goal
record it's got to be GAZZA.
I expect England to win easily and double figures isn't out of the
question........
Neil...
|
129.220 | Remeber where you heard it first ... | SIOG::BUCKLEY | Manchester - Championship Free Zone | Wed Feb 17 1993 14:03 | 5 |
|
England 4 1 San Marino
Barnes (2) The postman
Fat Boy
Ferdinand
|
129.221 | Remember? - how can we forget! | UNTADH::WILCOCKSON | Smoke Tabs, Drink Beer | Wed Feb 17 1993 16:50 | 18 |
| re: -< Remeber where you heard it first ... >
...and so yet another incredibly interesting predictions note topic
was started. Here's a few more to keep us all happy :-)
England 1 1 San Marino
England 2 1 San Marino
England 3 1 San Marino
England 1 2 San Marino
England 1 3 San Marino
England 1 0 San Marino
England 2 0 San Marino
England 3 0 San Marino
England 0 3 San Marino
England 0 2 San Marino
England 0 1 San Marino
Al. - let me know if I win!
|
129.222 | | SUBURB::SWAINM | Go on, gis a sheep... | Wed Feb 17 1993 18:17 | 2 |
| Is Ince playing tonight? Or is his son in a bad way?
|
129.223 | | REPAIR::WILSON | | Wed Feb 17 1993 18:20 | 4 |
|
Ince isnt playing...Batty takes his place.
Dave...
|
129.224 | | REPAIR::COSSEY | | Wed Feb 17 1993 18:21 | 5 |
|
Ince is OUT, Batty will replace him....
Neil..
|
129.225 | SH*T..but still its six. | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Feb 18 1993 11:18 | 19 |
|
England 6 San marino 0
Platt 4
Palmer
Ferdinand/Adams
England were rubbish but still got 6,hit the bar had two cleared off the
line and missed a penalty.
The only two players who played well imo were Platt and Batty.
Dixon and Barnes have made there last appearence for England
hopefully, and lets just hope Gascoignes performance was a one off,he
was Sh*t.
Still we are two points ahead of Holland with a far better goal
difference and have a game in hand over Norway.Sitting pretty.
Dave...
|
129.226 | Pathetic display. | ESSB::MCUNNIFFE | Pool-73,76,77,79,80,82-4,86,88,90 | Thu Feb 18 1993 11:48 | 12 |
|
England 6 San Marino 0
Apathetic display by England who found it very difficult to break down the
opposition. If I were John Barnes, I would have walked off the field. What
sort of mindless fans support England that they could boo one of their
players everytime he touched the ball. I have seen many international games
but never saw a player from the home team subjected to such abuse. After
watching that, I hope England go out of the world cup on goal difference.
Cunno
|
129.227 | HE'S FULL OF MORE B*LL**KS THAN TOM JONES Y-FRONTS | SUBURB::COMMIT | Commit Group | Thu Feb 18 1993 12:04 | 9 |
| Re 226
The reason he was booed, was for the fact that he's crap. Also I
thought Ireland weren't much better against crap opposition, lucky to
win via two late goals and for saying what you did about England....
I hope you can't get tickets to the scouse derby.
Barry
|
129.228 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | | Thu Feb 18 1993 12:32 | 16 |
| Barnes was no more crap than 10 other England players I could name, but won't
bother. There was absolutely no excuse at all for the abuse he got last night
and it is a bloody disgrace to English football that morons like that are
allowed out of whatever institutions they live in to watch the game.
The thing that bugs me is that surely whenever Graham Taylor goes to Sheffield
to watch Carlton Palmer and David Hirst he must also see Chris Waddle. Why
isn't Waddle in the team? I just don't understand....
To me, all Taylor seems to care about is work rate and not answering questions
when asked. I'm sure Lord Brian Clough or Glenn Hoddle could do better.
The best bit of the game was Peter "The Cat" Bonetti giving Woods a bit of
practice at half time. Does he help manage the team now?
Mike
|
129.229 | Barnes OUT!!!! | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Thu Feb 18 1993 12:54 | 17 |
|
Rubbish!! Barnes has had enough chances to prove himself, yet again he
fails to produce the goods the fans pay there money and are entitled
to vent their anger on who they want, so it was Barnes, tough shit he's
one of the best paid players in this country, kick him out of the
England side then he won't have put up with the abuse, i've defended him
on numerous occasions and like many others are fed up waiting for him
to produce a display that warrants his pay packet. I'm afaid he's
over weight, he's over paid and he's over stayed he's welcome in the
England set-up.
Poor performance last night but a 6-0 win will do for me....
Neil...
|
129.230 | | SUBURB::COMMIT | Commit Group | Thu Feb 18 1993 12:54 | 15 |
129.231 | Norwegian view | OSLACT::HENRIKW | Good news is a bad omen | Thu Feb 18 1993 14:03 | 8 |
| FWIW: a Norwegian paper calls Barnes "a disaster" after
last night's performance. The Norwegian coach Egil Olsen
was "a bit impressed by San Marino, a bit disappointed by
England".
Now back to your regular abuse. ;^)
Henrik
|
129.232 | | RDGENG::YERKESS | bring me sunshine in your smile | Thu Feb 18 1993 14:24 | 19 |
|
I watched the match last night on BBC and I must say that England
were poor. The problem seemed to be with the final pass into
the penalty area, often it would be hit a long the ground into
a wall of defenders.
A good point was made by Terry Venables in that the first goal
came from a corner were Barnes flicked it on for Platt to score.
John Barnes was then free at the near post for the next 17 or
so corners, but they never used him again until later in the match.
And when England decided to play the ball to the near post, it was
only when San Marino had put a player in front of him.
IMO the crowd were using John Barnes as a scapegoat, for it is
difficult to believe that an England team could put in as a whole
such a bad performance. Sad really but a sign of the times.
Phil.
|
129.233 | Lest we Forget !!! | UNTADA::BIRSE | Testa OSI Investigation team | Thu Feb 18 1993 15:06 | 11 |
| And only 3 mentions of 1966 by the Sky commentator.
Things are improving :^)...
1. Debatable 2nd goal....."Shades of 1966 there!!"
2. And the recent new of Bobby Moore's illness...all the country's
wishes are with him, even more than in 1966.
3. And a 4th goal for Platt, who was only 6 weeks old when we won
in 1966.
|
129.234 | 1966..1966..blah blah blah | BUSSTP::DREES | Three good buddies were... | Thu Feb 18 1993 15:32 | 14 |
|
John Motson on BBC also managed to squeeze 1966 in twice.
1. Debatable 2nd goal as was mentioned in the previous note.
2. When the fat boy hit the bar in the 2nd half and it came straight
down he said "that bounced the wrong side of the line unlike Hurst
in '66"...or something like that.
What a tosser.
Del.
Del.
|
129.235 | | FORTY2::ASH | Grahame Ash @REO | Thu Feb 18 1993 15:57 | 11 |
| Re .231
Hi Henrik,
So, are Norway feeling pretty confident now? More points, better goal
difference . . . if your newspaers are like ours, you'll be planning your US
trips by now.
g
ps I agreed with Neil cossey's note - I'm off for a lie-down.
|
129.236 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Thu Feb 18 1993 16:18 | 4 |
|
Whats wrong with talking about 66, at least we have past glories to
talk about. Anyway you better get ready becuase all your gonna hear
soon is how we won in 94 .....
|
129.237 | Barnes is Like Liverpool!!! CRAP | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Thu Feb 18 1993 16:36 | 23 |
|
Since the Norway game San Marino have learnt that they cant go out and
attack, so all they do is defend and trying to break down a 11 man
defence is difficult, if England had played San Marino the same night
Norway did then England too would have slaughtered them and lets face
it England could have won by a ten goal margin last night except for
some bad misses and enspired goalkeeping, the longer the competion
goes on the more difficult it will be to score a hatful against them.
So six goals might not look to bad.
Why shouldn't the commentators refer to the 1966 World Cup when certain
similarities occur....This is a World Cup campaign and we did actually
WIN IT in 1966.......And Bobby Moore was the Captain of the side...
Geoff Hurst had a goal controversial allowed then went on to score
a hat trick and is the only player EVER to do this in the final..
Sounds good every time I'm made aware of it.....
Neil....
|
129.238 | and the table | FORTY2::ASH | Grahame Ash @REO | Thu Feb 18 1993 16:38 | 12 |
|
P W D L F A Pts
Norway 4 3 1 0 15 2 7
England 3 2 1 0 11 1 5
Netherlands 3 1 1 1 6 5 3
Poland 2 1 1 0 3 2 3
Turkey 4 1 0 3 5 9 2
San Marino 4 0 0 4 1 22 0
g
|
129.239 | Coz - the full stop's on the right of the keyboard | HEART::DIDCOCK | | Thu Feb 18 1993 17:25 | 6 |
|
I agree with Neil Cossie too - but I know what you mean Graham -
I'm exhasted after getting through the first 7-line sentence without
breathing.
C
|
129.240 | | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Thu Feb 18 1993 17:45 | 6 |
|
Cliff, you think reading them are hard work you should try writing
them......
Neil...
|
129.241 | Where was Gazza ? | SHIPS::DURANT_S | | Thu Feb 18 1993 18:50 | 14 |
|
I was disappointed it was only six, especially as I had bet on seven
and so had to buy the next round.
I agree Barnes wasn't very effective and neither was Gazza for some
reason. I would have liked to have seen Sharpe on the substitutes bench
to liven things up later on, and maybe even have tried Nigel Clough.
Still six goals keeps us in the fray, as long as Poland don't get
carried away over the next month. Watch them come up the table as they
have two games against San Marino over the next month.
Steve.
|
129.242 | You've Got To Take Your Chances | SHIPS::DURANT_S | | Thu Feb 18 1993 19:30 | 14 |
|
If England had approached the game in the first half as they approached
it at times in the second, more directly, then they would have tired
out the San Marino's even more than they did. Hopefully that would have
led to more goals.
Still the real tests start coming up now, after the Turkey game, and
England are there with one of the better goal differences. Now they
need to collect the all important points as well. Then if it comes to
the last game, England have the luxury of playing San Marino while the
others have to scrap it out.
Steve.
|
129.243 | | TRUCKS::WARDR | | Thu Feb 18 1993 20:47 | 11 |
| I was only disappointed that England didn't score at halftime - after
all that's what the papers and everyone else predicted .......
There was a program on C4 a few months ago that discussed the WC in
Sweden - I may have mentioned it elsewhere. Most of the fans were
having a jolly good old time - win, lose or draw - it was life.
All except the England fans - who were whining and complaining
about everything and anything. The last 20 or so notes confirm
this. Look on the bright side of life ?? - not likely ..
Ray
|
129.244 | Even Italy couldn't be bothered | HEART::DIDCOCK | | Thu Feb 18 1993 21:14 | 11 |
|
Moaning about the world cup in Sweden? Well I was for one - paid
all that money - where were Brazil - nowhere, Argentina? Didn't
bother coming. As if that wasn't enough there were no emerging nations
to knock Scotland out. And as if that wasn't enough - couldn't afford
the lager.
I'm not going to see the world cup in Sweden again,
Cliff
|
129.245 | TO BOO OR NOT TO BOO | MACNAS::SMORAN | | Fri Feb 19 1993 06:03 | 10 |
| I don't think the BOOING of Barnes did any good for the rest of the
players but then again they must be getting used to it, because over
the last couple of years they are the MOST BOO'd TEAM and thats from
their own supporters. As far as Barnes earning his wages, don't all
English Players get paid the same ?? GASCOIGNE wasn't much use either
but I suppose he is the darling of England at present but his day will
come when those so called Supporters will BOO him as well. One thing
the players won't have to worry about, is being BOO'd in June '94 .))
|
129.246 | ;-) | SIOG::APPS_PB | Manchester - Championship Free Zone | Fri Feb 19 1993 13:40 | 6 |
| Ray
You'd moan too if you spent that much money to watch that crowd of
donkeys.
Patrick.
|
129.247 | LUCKY 6, Could have been worse | PEKING::MCKIEN | NICK | Fri Feb 19 1993 16:40 | 11 |
|
I can see England scoring more than 6 Goals AWAY from home against
San Marino. Simply because they won't feel the presure and
expectation's from a crowd of supporters that can't understand
that they can't win EVERY game easily.
NICK.
|
129.248 | Barnes...WHY!!! | NEWOA::GUTHRIE_J | What colour is the sky in your world | Sat Feb 20 1993 12:12 | 31 |
| Before the game I thought if we got six then that would be quite a good
result and would more than likely be enough for our goal difference.But
after watching the game and realising just how bad San Marino were and
finding out (courtesy of Mr Motson) that San Marino only has a
population of 25,000 I fear this will infact not be good enough.I mean
come on there were 51,000 people at Wembley and if you chose carefully
you probably could have picked a team from that lot that would have
given San Marino a good game,if not beating them.There are teams in
our group that will quite rightly get into doulbe figures against this
lot,Norway have already done it,others will follow.
I fear this group will end up being very tight,especially in veiw of
Norways good start and Hollands slow start,you can almost guarantee
that Holland will pick up quite a few points in their games to come as
there side had too many quality players not to be in contention at the
end.
On the Barnes question I've been(as well as many others)saying for over
two years now,why the hell is he still inculded in the squad,how many
chances does this man need,does he need to beat Englands all time
appearence record before he has a good game,it certainly seems that
way.Also ponder this Tony Adams looked more dangerous going forward
than Barnes on Wednesday and he's hardly what you would call a creative
player.
Sorry to have a whinge and moan,I also hate it when everyone in this
country expects England to have a sparling game every time,but I just
fear that due to this result/performance we may not qualify,and I've
got mr heart set on going to America to watch England.
Jason...The Omnipotent one.
|
129.249 | Netherlands - Turkey 3-1 | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Thu Feb 25 1993 11:17 | 6 |
| Exciting game with two attacking teams and one terrible referee. The
Dutch started furiously and scored 1-0 after 4 minutes. The Turks
didn't defend but took over the initiative. With a (doubtfull) penalty
they equalized. One minute later 2-1 by Witsge ( doubtfull too).
The game was open untill Witschge scored 3-1 in the second half.
|
129.250 | San Marino get their first point! | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Oscar the Grouch is an Optimist! | Thu Mar 11 1993 19:53 | 1 |
| San Marino 0 - Turkey 0
|
129.251 | Anyone got the WC results? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Oscar the Grouch is an Optimist! | Thu Mar 25 1993 18:37 | 7 |
| San Marino played last night - anyone know the score.
Any other results appreciated as once again i missed World Service.
regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
129.252 | 6-0 Aand No, they Did'nt Win | ESSB::BLONG | Europe is Scouse Free | Thu Mar 25 1993 18:39 | 1 |
|
|
129.253 | Same as England | YUPPY::PATEMAN | Scuba Dive in my Think Tank | Thu Mar 25 1993 18:40 | 3 |
| Holland 6 SM 0
Paul
|
129.254 | possible 5-a-side hall booking cock-up | FORTY2::ETHERIDGE | lumme | Tue Mar 30 1993 14:12 | 4 |
| At what time GMT does the Turkey-England game kick off in Izmir please?
Thanks,
Ian.
|
129.255 | Before You Finish Work | PANIC::ANDERSON | The original Magpies | Tue Mar 30 1993 14:13 | 3 |
| 3pm GMT
i.e. 4pm BST
|
129.256 | | FORTY2::ETHERIDGE | lumme | Tue Mar 30 1993 14:21 | 6 |
| re .255
Thanks. Looks like I'll make use of the flexible working hours, get in
ridiculously early and get down to a Sky pub for 4.
Ian.
|
129.257 | Your a Muddy Marvel Gazza.... | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Tue Mar 30 1993 14:48 | 15 |
|
Great pictures in the Sun of Gazza and Ian Wright messing about in the
mud at Englands training ground in Turkey. Not only is he the greatest
player in the world but the greatest character in the game, and with Gazza
in this mood expect another world class performance from the genius,after
his below performance against San Marino.
It's great to see even with all the pressure he's under to succeed or
by some people fail, he hasn't lost his sense of humour.
My prediction for tomorrow nights game is Turkey 0 England 3....
Neil....
|
129.258 | Turkey v England. | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Tue Mar 30 1993 17:02 | 21 |
|
The England team to play Turkey tomorrow is:
Woods
Dixon
Sinton
Palmer
Adams
Walker
Gascoigne
Platt
Wright
Ferdinand
Ince
If Ferdinand doesnt make it Barnes will play. He is on the bench along
with Sharpe, I cant remeber who the other subs are apart from Seaman.
Dave...
|
129.259 | Your a Muddy Muppet Gazza.... | BUSSTP::DSMITH | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRAT | Tue Mar 30 1993 22:21 | 24 |
|
re .257
Neil, I'm beginning to think you're after a job as the FATMANS pr
agent. Either that or you've developed a nasty schoolboy crush for the
over-rated, over-weighted one.
The messing around at training that has you in such ecstasy
happens every week at football clubs all over the country. The media
has made such an issue of it only because they have nothing else
worthwhile to comment about.
Under-pressure, give me a break. If I was earning the sort of
money he is, I would still have a sense of humor. If he has yet
another bad game, I'm sure he'll still be laughing all the way to
the bank.
My prediction (hope, wish, prayer) for tomorrow night
Turkey 1 Engerland 0
and a stinker from FATBOY
|
129.260 | I'd shag him!!!\ | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Wed Mar 31 1993 11:49 | 14 |
|
One thing Gazza's NOT is overrated, and lets face it every country
would love to have a Gazza in there side. Except Scotland of course who
are more interested in finding poofters to fill there frilly pink
shirts. The man is the most talented footballer in the world with a great
sense of humour, which is very rare in the game at the moment.
As for your other comments, a little bit of Scottish jealousy I think.
Prediction Turkey 0 ENGLAND 3
Gazza 3
Neil....
|
129.261 | Sorry, just couldn't resist... | KBOMFG::KOEPPE | Think Imaginary... | Wed Mar 31 1993 12:46 | 17 |
|
> The man is the most talented footballer in the world with a great
^^^^^^^^^^
> sense of humour, which is very rare in the game at the moment.
^^^^^^
I think this should read...
The man is the most talented clown in the world with a great
^^^^^
sense of how to play football, which is very rare in the game at the
moment. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Eduard :-) :-) ;-)
who loved to do diving headers, when the ground was soaked and muddy ;-)
|
129.262 | What the hell is he on about!!! | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Wed Mar 31 1993 12:57 | 5 |
|
re:1
Been smoking something dodgy have we...
Neil.
|
129.263 | We Think Gazza's nice!! | PAKORA::DGAMBLES | | Wed Mar 31 1993 13:06 | 15 |
|
Re last.
I'm pretty sure I am speaking for the whole of the Scottish nation
here when I wish England the best of British in their game against
the vastly underrated Turkish squad.
I also hope that extremely nice person Gazza can add a few goals
to his tally, as he truly is the original English gent, has a super
sense of humor and an ambassador to the game of soccer.
I hope you understand that not all us Scottish folks aren't biased,
jelous Union hating poofters.
Daphne.
|
129.264 | Only a joke... | KBOMFG::KOEPPE | Think Imaginary... | Wed Mar 31 1993 13:28 | 10 |
| RE. .262
Calm down Neil, it was only a joke! ;-)
In fact, I quite like his sense of humour and think he is
a very good football player.
"The most talented player in the world" is your opinion,
which I accept, but don't share.
Eduard
|
129.265 | | TRUCKS::SANT | Nostalgia *is* what it used to be... | Wed Mar 31 1993 13:31 | 8 |
|
It'll be
Turkey 0 England 0
Another bore draw.
Andy.
|
129.266 | Wright scores....then limps off injured. | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Wed Mar 31 1993 13:42 | 10 |
|
Re-1
The old fence sitters back....
England will win, who cares if its 1-0 or 10-0, two points in the bag,
thats all the matters.
Dave...
|
129.267 | WORLD CUP HERE WE COME.... | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Wed Mar 31 1993 14:35 | 5 |
|
England will win 1-0 with Tony Adams getting the goal from a
corner midway through the second half...
Remember where you heard it first!!!!!
|
129.268 | Gazza gets 2, Wright and Ince the others!!!!!!!!!! | PEKING::DAVIESG | Remember kids - not at home! | Wed Mar 31 1993 14:35 | 5 |
| England 4 Turkey 1
You heard it from me first.....
GrEg/..
|
129.269 | Ferdinand out, Barnes in ? | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Wed Mar 31 1993 15:11 | 5 |
|
Ferdinand is definatly OUT, so it looks like Mr Blobby gets another
chance.
Dave...
|
129.270 | | TRUCKS::SANT | Nostalgia *is* what it used to be... | Wed Mar 31 1993 18:03 | 6 |
|
Dave, for how long have I been a "fence sitter" ? 8-)
Those that actually know me would suggest otherwise.....
Andy.
|
129.271 | 1 Up | YUPPY::PATEMAN | Scuba Dive in my Think Tank | Wed Mar 31 1993 20:14 | 7 |
| Latest -
Turkey 0 England 1
Platt 6"
Paul
|
129.272 | 1-0 | UPROAR::GAYLEB | Coffee (H.S.B) | Wed Mar 31 1993 20:15 | 3 |
| England are 1-0 up after only a few minutes
David Platt
|
129.273 | 2-0 | UPROAR::GAYLEB | Coffee (H.S.B) | Wed Mar 31 1993 20:57 | 2 |
| 2-0
Gascoine on half time
|
129.274 | Update - Turkish Delight - NOT | YUPPY::PATEMAN | Scuba Dive in my Think Tank | Wed Mar 31 1993 21:15 | 9 |
| The England crowd, players, FA officials and commentators are all being
pelted with stones, coins etc. Also the Turkish players are kicking
lumps out of the England players. However, the Turks have had to bring
on their sub g'keeper.
England sub - Clough for Dixon who was getting well clattered on a
regular basis, Ince dropping back to right back.
Paul
|
129.275 | | CLADA::DODONNELL | Nothing personal.It's just business. | Wed Mar 31 1993 21:19 | 5 |
|
Last time Ireland played turkey, the Irish supporters recieved
the same treatment. Hope FIFA take stern action against the Turks
for this. This type of behaviour makes me almost want to see
England win. ;')
|
129.276 | two points | WOTVAX::MACDONALDI | Stalybridge Celtic | Wed Mar 31 1993 22:05 | 11 |
|
Final Score:
Turkey 0 England 2
Platt 6'
Gasgoine 48'
England subs were used as Dixon replaced by
Clough, and Wright replaced by Sharpe, both
injured !!!!
Mac
|
129.277 | What a double-act | BUSSTP::DSMITH | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRAT | Wed Mar 31 1993 22:36 | 18 |
|
Well done Engerland on a marvellous exhibition of football against
world-class opposition in hostile Turkey. Goals from the great double
act of Platt and Pratt saw them pick up another 2 points in their
world cup campaign. We should award all the players and back-room
team with the Victoria Cross following todays game. Simply spiffing
show from the chaps.
ps Pass the sick bag.
pps Neil, following the title to your note .260, I think your just
the chappie required to fill one of those frilly pink shirts. Maybe
your just a tad jealous that you couldn't join them in the showers
after the game. Nudge, nudge, wink, wink etc.
|
129.278 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Thu Apr 01 1993 11:44 | 9 |
|
Great win for England, Tony Adams made some brilliant challenges
in the box to stop the Turks from scoring, also Paul Ince had a
great game. Platt put England in front from a Barnes free-kick
on six minutes, Gazza headed the second in first half injury
time. The Turks never really looked like scoring but did their
best to get a penalty when in the area.
Andy..B
|
129.279 | Good result. | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Apr 01 1993 12:26 | 20 |
|
Good solid performance from England. Adams and Walker played well
together and despite the fact the Turks had alot of posession and
played some good Football at times, never looked like scoring.
Another two points from a potentially difficult game in difficult
conditions. We are second in the group on goal difference, and when we
beat Holland later this month, we will go 2 points clear of the Dutch
with a game in hand.
Re.277
As usual when England win, a few jealuos McNoters come in here and
start whinging about this and that. Yor right Turkey arent world class,
they are probably on a par with Scotland as one of the worlds weaker
footballing nations, never mind lads...... maybe you can organise a
tournement next June for the likes of Turkey, San Marino and Scotland,
while the rest of us will be in the USA.
Dave...
|
129.280 | Sorry Mod.. | PAKORA::DGAMBLES | | Thu Apr 01 1993 12:40 | 3 |
|
Dave,
At least we 'jealous Mcnoters' can admit our team are Shite!!
|
129.281 | Deja Vu | GALVIA::SPAIN | There's always the U.S. | Thu Apr 01 1993 13:23 | 8 |
|
Good win for England.
I hope the UEFA observer wasn't blind and deaf this time and maybe the
Turks may get punished for pelting the players,fans and officials with
coins.
Gary.
|
129.282 | | PEKING::DAVIESG | Remember kids - not at home! | Thu Apr 01 1993 13:33 | 10 |
|
A good win in difficult conditions.
Just one thing: Why does Taylor insist on using that Planet Barnes. The
man just cannot play for his country. Should of subbed him sooner and
brought someone (ANYONE!) else on. Let's face facts, he's no bloody
good. Apart from that, we played well, lets hope someone does something
about those fouling Turks, they could have done even more damage.
GrEg...
|
129.283 | | FORTY2::ASH | Grahame Ash @REO | Thu Apr 01 1993 14:33 | 6 |
| Barnes may not be the talent we hoped he'd be but did you see the game
yesterday? Who made Platt's goal? Who set him up for a second in the second
half (he blasted it wide)? We haven't got that many players who can pass a
ball that accurately . .
grahame
|
129.284 | No complaints from me.. | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Apr 01 1993 14:44 | 7 |
|
re-1
I agree, Barnes did ok yestarday.
Dave...
|
129.285 | | GVA02::LAINSBURY | Top 6 by May | Thu Apr 01 1993 16:23 | 5 |
| Can anyone post the table and the next lot of fixtures ? I'm sure it's
lurking in the back of some paper.
Cheers,
Andy
|
129.286 | | SUBURB::WAITEG | THE END OF SILENCE | Thu Apr 01 1993 16:34 | 14 |
| GROUP 2
P W D L F A PTS
Norway 4 3 1 0 15 2 7
England 4 3 1 0 13 1 7
Holland 5 3 1 1 15 6 7
Poland 2 1 1 0 3 2 3
Turkey 7 1 1 5 6 14 3
San Marino 6 0 1 5 1 28 1
* England V Holland *
|
129.287 | Subs | CLADA::JMURPHY | It's a Funny Auld game.... | Thu Apr 01 1993 18:34 | 4 |
|
What subs did England use yesterday?????
jm
|
129.288 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Tripple ripple truffle shuffler | Thu Apr 01 1993 18:38 | 4 |
|
Clough (for Dixon) and Sharpe (for Wright?).
Tim
|
129.289 | The stupid thing is..they CAN play better. | GYMAC::DCASSIDY | | Thu Apr 01 1993 18:46 | 28 |
|
Sorry to say this to those who thought it was enjoyable, but you must
have been watching a different game. England were rubbish. There was no
first time control of the ball on over 80% of requirements. They had no
idea (including Gazza) of how to hold the ball up (as a supposed World
class team should do !!??!!) and the only plus sign was the fact that
they took what few chances were put their way. This might well be an
advantage at the the end of April as I can't see the Dutch being as
generous as Turkey i.e. on last night's showing they might be lucky to
get one shot in against Holland.
Some may have complained with the pitch...anybody see the Brazilian
football pitches these days and the standard that's played on them. Let's
face it, the pitch WAS the problem with England. It just goes to show
where the English game needs coaching. It's quite amazing that with the
amount of time the ball is spent in the air in the English league that
players cannot control/kill the ball first time. The amateurs from HSC
Berlin (who incidentally got to the final of the German Cup) had more
inclination of what to do with the ball last night than England.
I may sound annoyed...I just can't believe how a team can change so
rapidly from one that played against Turkey 5 months ago and today.
Somebody please enlighten me....I suspect it may have something to
do with the 'so called 'virtual' 3 hour jet-lag of flying to Turkey'
Dissappointed.....
Dezzz...
|
129.290 | Blobby Gets Another Chance ? | SHIPS::DURANT_S | | Fri Apr 23 1993 19:34 | 9 |
|
According to the Arsenal notes conference it would appear that Ian
Wright has broken his toe. This means he will miss the Holland game on
Wednesday.
I suppose this means "Isotonic Gut" Barnes will take his place !!!
Steve.
|
129.291 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Fri Apr 23 1993 19:49 | 11 |
|
Some reports are saying Wright would have only made the subs bench
anyway, with Taylor prefering Platt and Ferdinand in attack.
Merson could come in for Platt in midfield, he's in good form. Barnes
should'nt be playing at all, Lee Sharpe should be in the team in front
of Barnes.
Or maybe Teddy Sheringham could get his big chance.....
Dave...
|
129.292 | TV | XSTACY::KMCGRATH | Long road, patient donkey | Mon Apr 26 1993 18:22 | 2 |
| What time is this match on at and whats the TV coverage like?
|
129.293 | | TRUCKS::SANT | Nostalgia *is* what it used to be... | Mon Apr 26 1993 18:35 | 8 |
|
err...
8pm? It'll be taped and played on Sportsnight, at 10pm I expect...
Live on R5 though...
Andy.
|
129.294 | Problems | SHIPS::DURANT_S | | Mon Apr 26 1993 20:21 | 14 |
|
What is happening with England's left back position. With both Dorigo
and Pearce injured is Taylor intending to use Sinton ? Is Beresford
from Newcastle selected or is he going to use Keown out of position ?
Looks like a dodgy area in England's team to me, especially with Gullit
wandering around there.
I presume the game is live on Sky Sports on Wednesday ?
Steve.
|
129.295 | | FORTY2::ROBERTSON | Living with Flamingos on the DELTA | Tue Apr 27 1993 15:45 | 3 |
| >> I presume the game is live on Sky Sports on Wednesday ?
Yep
|
129.296 | Julian Dicks is yer man | HEART::DIDCOCK | | Tue Apr 27 1993 17:18 | 6 |
|
If Stuart Pearce can't play, the obvious choice has to be Julian
Dicks. Good crosser of the ball, whacks the free-kicks, and if
anyone ever deserved the nick-name psycho Julian is a must.
Cliff
|
129.297 | He Who Worships Mark Dennis ...... | PANIC::ANDERSON | The original Magpies | Tue Apr 27 1993 17:25 | 6 |
| Re .296
....but I think England will need 11 players for the whole 90
minutes....
Rob
|
129.298 | Irish interest in the game tomorrow | GALVIA::SPAIN | There's always the U.S. | Tue Apr 27 1993 17:39 | 12 |
|
I'm sure all Irish football fans will support our close friends and
near neighbours from across the water in Wembley tomorrow night. With
the many cultural similarities and the great friendships forged during
our recent World Cup and European championship meetings we'll have our
fingers crossed for our close friends.
So Come on Holland.
Gary.
|
129.299 | change of heart??? | ESSB::BREE | | Tue Apr 27 1993 18:10 | 5 |
| Yes Gary,
Nice to see you're coming round a bit!!!
Paul
|
129.300 | Wot's the line up then? | UKARC1::ELANGCO | | Tue Apr 27 1993 18:24 | 5 |
| Anyone care to speculate? As of this morning England have a full squad including
Nigel Winterburn. Is Wright available?
Should be a good match!
|
129.301 | yeah.... | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Tue Apr 27 1993 18:26 | 11 |
|
Re-2
Gary..
The feelings mutual...
Come on You Danes...and come to think of it lets hope that Portugal
spank the Jocks.
Dave...
|
129.302 | England 1 Holland 3 | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Tue Apr 27 1993 18:55 | 21 |
| <<< Note 129.298 by GALVIA::SPAIN "There's always the U.S." >>>
-< Irish interest in the game tomorrow >-
>> I'm sure all Irish football fans will support our close friends and
>> near neighbours from across the water in Wembley tomorrow night. With
>> the many cultural similarities and the great friendships forged during
>> our recent World Cup and European championship meetings we'll have our
>> fingers crossed for our close friends.
>> So Come on Holland.
>> Gary.
Gary,
good on you, hope to see you in the States in 1994!!!!!!
T_
|
129.303 | prediction | ESSB::BREE | | Tue Apr 27 1993 21:06 | 7 |
| England are no mugs, especially at home, so given that Gascoigne is fit
my prediction is:
England 1 Holland 1
Platt Bergkamp
|
129.304 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Wed Apr 28 1993 12:25 | 23 |
|
England Team for tonights game...
Woods
Dixon
Keown
Walker
Adams
Palmer
Ince
Gascoigne
Barnes
Ferdinand
Platt
I hope Holland play like there U21's did last night, they were awfull.
(England won 3-0).
This will be the hardest game in the group so far, but Holland have
struggled in the group so far. I go for a 2-0 win for England.
Dave...
|
129.305 | England to win comfortably!!! | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Wed Apr 28 1993 13:09 | 8 |
|
Not a bad side, still have my doubts about not playing a recognized
left back, I still think we will over come a Holland side who are
marginly better than Turkey at the moment..
England 2 Holland 0
Neil..
|
129.306 | | ECCGY4::HAIGH | Dyslexia comes in a glass | Wed Apr 28 1993 14:00 | 5 |
| >I still think we will over come a Holland side who are
>marginly better than Turkey at the moment..
So about the same as us then! I'll go for bore-draw. And the same
in Dublin.
|
129.307 | Forever an optimist.... | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Wed Apr 28 1993 14:20 | 5 |
| I'll go for a 2-1 win for England with the winner coming from
a Gascoine free kick in the last few moments, this to make up for the
disalowed one against Holland in the last World Cup.
-Dom
|
129.308 | goodbye jocks | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Wed Apr 28 1993 14:51 | 10 |
|
Tonight will be a great moment for us English lads, pounding Holland
and seeing the Jocks out of the world cup.. I dont know why they
bother entering, probably so when they do actually get there they
give us a good laugh by getting hammered by Costa Rica and other
crap sides.
England 1 Holland 0
Adams..
|
129.309 | | BUSSTP::DREES | Three good buddies were... | Wed Apr 28 1993 15:13 | 9 |
|
re. last
Another wonderful witty reply from the skin headed one.......
Still, not to rise to the bait this Scot will go for a narrow
1-0 victory for Engerland.
Del.
|
129.310 | It 'll be boring | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Wed Apr 28 1993 15:50 | 3 |
| A boring draw : 0-0.....because they both go for this....
John
|
129.311 | SON OF HITLER... | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Wed Apr 28 1993 15:54 | 4 |
|
There is no way that this match will be a 0-0 draw, you must be
thinking of the Ireland v Denmark, cause when ever they play anyone
half decent its always a 0-0 draw..
|
129.312 | England 1966, 1994 | FORTY2::FOWLERM | | Wed Apr 28 1993 16:03 | 7 |
| 2:0 to England, with Les Ferdinand scoring both.
Expect to see Bergkamp play no part in the game, due to being either
a) marked by the English defense
b) kicked in the head by Tony Adams
Mike
|
129.313 | Adams for Dutch cap.. | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Wed Apr 28 1993 16:52 | 3 |
|
Or dropped by Tony Adams you mean...
|
129.314 | We'll see to that ! | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Wed Apr 28 1993 18:03 | 5 |
| re -1,-2
Bergkamp is still from Ajax : No one can stop him then himself.....
By shooting against the keeper or next the goal.....
I don't think that anyone of the english defense is able of stopping
him ! OK by foul play, very foul play......
|
129.315 | Bergkamp, WHO! | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Wed Apr 28 1993 18:59 | 8 |
|
Bergkamp is an average Dutch league player and I'm afraid he will up
against a tough quick English defence. I'm afraid he won't pose any
problems your chance of getting a goal was gone when Van Basten was
ruled out through injury.
Neil.
|
129.316 | Bergkamp, shmergkamp. | FORTY2::FOWLERM | | Wed Apr 28 1993 19:02 | 5 |
| Bergkamp has no chance against our defense.
He'll be substituted before the end of the game, or I'll eat my hat. 8-)
Mike
|
129.317 | | ECCGY4::HAIGH | Dyslexia comes in a glass | Wed Apr 28 1993 19:05 | 7 |
|
And as for Gullit and Rijkard, they're just average players in
average Italian league, and if Koeman was playing it wouldn't make any
difference because he's just an average player in an average Spanish
league.
Hey this wind-up thing's easy! Thanks for the template!
|
129.318 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | | Wed Apr 28 1993 19:08 | 7 |
| Good innit..
de Wolf? pah. get a haircut you hippy.
Wouters? I'd rather play David Burrows
Who else have they got?
|
129.319 | England 1 Holland 3 | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Wed Apr 28 1993 20:18 | 17 |
| rep last few
What a shame if England gets beaten tonight by a bunch of average players
from Holland.
You know what, forget about the if 'cause you get beaten! :-)))))
I really don't know but how can you say you've got a good team if you're
best player ie Waddle isn't even in the squad.
I would like to thank mr. Taylor for putting Donkey Adams in the squad
never seen such a slow donkey in my life, the Dutch attackers will be past
him before he has waken up.
Good luck tonight chaps.
T_
|
129.320 | | UKARC1::ELANGCO | | Wed Apr 28 1993 20:43 | 8 |
| re -.1
It was a shame this donkey kept the best player quite on April the 18th
wasn't it?
I think Winterburn is better bet than Keown for left back. It is going to
be a tough one if Rijikard, Gullit and Winter play their best. Anyway England
are not going to loose.
|
129.321 | Ireland drew, Scotland are losing... | TRUCKS::SANT | Nostalgia *is* what it used to be... | Thu Apr 29 1993 01:24 | 7 |
129.322 | good to hear... | EICMFG::HOWE | The sinking ship.. has SUNK!! | Thu Apr 29 1993 01:29 | 4 |
|
Thanks!!! I was starting to get the idea we were losing!
Keith.
|
129.323 | How did it finish? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | on the Streets of San Francisco | Thu Apr 29 1993 02:36 | 1 |
|
|
129.324 | NOT !!!!!! | KIRKTN::CPATRICK | You Aint Seen Nothing,YET | Thu Apr 29 1993 02:43 | 7 |
|
England 2 Holland 3
Barnes Bergkamp 3
Platt
SQF Jambo
|
129.325 | Lots of hat eating tomorrow? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | on the Streets of San Francisco | Thu Apr 29 1993 03:01 | 6 |
| So Bergkamp scores 3 - bet the authors of .315 and .316 will keep their
heads down in the morning!!
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
129.326 | What I saw... | CLARID::KREYER | Andre KREYER - Valbonne | Thu Apr 29 1993 04:01 | 25 |
| <<< Note 129.325 by AIMTEC::WICKS_A "on the Streets of San Francisco" >>>
> -< Lots of hat eating tomorrow? >-
>
> So Bergkamp scores 3 - bet the authors of .315 and .316 will keep their
> heads down in the morning!!
I guess the author of .324 was pulling someones legs... or I've
seen an edited version of that game.
What was shown in France ended 2 - 2 with Holland scoring on a
(deserved) penalty with 3 minutes to go...
And a round of humble pie for a couple of Englishmen...
Short comment: great first half, but most of the second was a non
event. I still fail to understand what Carlton PALMER and John
BARNES were supposed to do in the telly. The first one can't pass
a ball to one of his team mates and the second got back sleeping
after a great start (this only lasted 2 minutes).
By the way, where was Gascoigne during the second half? I thought
he must be your best player by the tune of certain notes in here!
Completely biased, .Andre.
|
129.327 | | PAKORA::AMILLAR | And some late news just in... | Thu Apr 29 1993 04:33 | 7 |
|
What an absolutely disastrous result for England. I doubt that the
country, never mind the team, will recover from this. The word I have
is that they were lucky to score at all, and that both goals were
offside deflections.
|
129.328 | | KIRKTN::DGAMBLES | | Thu Apr 29 1993 05:25 | 8 |
|
re last-
If required, us 'jocks' will aid the recovery program..
It seems the English lads just can't handle the big stage!
Concerned noter.
|
129.329 | | KIRKTN::AMILLAR | And some late news just in... | Thu Apr 29 1993 05:39 | 9 |
|
It was either Confuscious or Nostradamis who once said,
"A 2-2 draw at home is like losing 6-0 away from home"
....and I would have to agree.
Archie
|
129.330 | Excellent Game... | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Thu Apr 29 1993 11:51 | 17 |
|
Great performance, great game, England thoughly deserved a victory last
night with there best performance under Graham Taylor. Contrary to what
the last few notes have said(bitter Jocks) England can take heart from
this performance. With a game in hand they will still qualify with who
I'm not sure....Is this the last we'll see of Gullit in a Holland
shirt ?.
Disapointed with a draw as the performance deserved a win, were
still in there which is more than I can say for a certain team
North of the border.
I'll take back what I said about Berkamp, he looks the part and when
Van-Basten is back they will prove a formidable partnership.
Neil...
|
129.331 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Thu Apr 29 1993 11:52 | 17 |
|
What a brilliant display of football, John Barnes scoring in the first
minute from a free kick. That goal must John Barnes place in the side
for the next two years. The Dutch had trouble containing the pure
brilliance of the might Gazza so gave him a couple of elbows to see
that he didn't return for the second half. The Dutch at the end of
the game looked as if they had given up until they got a penalty, which
they scored to make it 2-2. Les Ferdinand had a penalty turned down
when a Dutch defender had taken his legs away in the box.
The night ended happy when the score of
Portugal 5 Jocks 0
hooray! hooray! hooray! hooray! hooray! hooray! hooray!
Andy...B
|
129.332 | Dissapointing Result....great game. | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Apr 29 1993 12:20 | 11 |
|
Its dissapointing, its another game that we should have won at home. I
hope these lost points wont cost us. Very good game, England deserved
to win as they easily contained the Dutch apart from a moment of magic
from Bergkamp. They didnt create anything in the second half, apart
from the penalty. No arguements about that.
Still we didnt lose, and are still in there. Norway looked very
vunerable against Turkey in the first half. We can go there and win.
Dave...
|
129.333 | General comments | XSTACY::JLUNDON | @GAO 822-4715 Leeds Champions | Thu Apr 29 1993 12:50 | 8 |
| Engalnd, fair play, fought well last night and were a little unlucky not to
come away with a win.
Does anyone think that Walker should have been sent off for the penalty as the
letter of the law demands that his foul was of the profesional type - pulling
down the man with no one to beat except the goalie?
James.
|
129.334 | Norway and who?? | ESSB::BREE | | Thu Apr 29 1993 13:37 | 11 |
| I am no fan of England's but I must say that last night's game showed
them in a very good light. They were quite like Germany the way they
moved the ball forward so directly.
All in all they can feel unlucky but surely with less than 5 minutes to
go there's come a time to start hoofing the ball out of the park
instead of passing it about?
cheers,
Paul
|
129.335 | | FORTY2::ABRAHAMS | | Thu Apr 29 1993 13:50 | 2 |
|
Do you want some salt with that hat, Mike?
|
129.336 | There's no justice | FORTY2::FOWLERM | | Thu Apr 29 1993 14:02 | 23 |
| I was not entirely serious when I was slagging the Dutch players yesterday, but
I am now.
What a dirty bunch of gits. England may not have the attacking flair of the Dutch
but at least we don't get up to the sort of disgraceful behaviour chaps like
Wouters, de Wolf, and the bloke that chopped Les Ferdinand down did last night.
From what I saw on Sportsnight we were unlucky to only draw, and at least two
of the Dutch defenders should have been sent off.
I am normally a man of my word, and I was more than happy to chow down on a
tasty bowler but I shan't now because we were robbed and a draw was a crime of
mammoth proportions.
Holland a class team? My backside they are.
England and Norway for USA '94 and good riddance to Holland.
Bergkamp and Wotsisface the other striker were a bit flash though.
See, completely unbiased. 8-)
Mike
|
129.337 | | ECCGY4::HAIGH | Dyslexia comes in a glass | Thu Apr 29 1993 14:07 | 17 |
|
I don't know about Walker being sent off for the penalty incident,
but what an absolutely STUPID thing to do! I saw Walker get played of
the park by Papin recently, and with that incident he seems to be
seriously off-form.
I thought that .315 was a wind-up, were you serious about thinking
Bergkamp was average? He's scored brilliant goals like that
consistently in the last two years.
I only saw very brief highlighs on German telly last night, but
England looked to be quite good for a change. I still think G Taylor is
a waste of space though.
Wouters elbow on Gasgoigne was terrible! Although to be fair to the
ref, it was only noticeable on the slow motion replay. A 4th official
with camera assistance would surely have red carded him.
|
129.338 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Apr 29 1993 14:25 | 14 |
|
Des Walker should have been sent off really, but why didnt he just bring
him down outside the box ???. He was going to bring him down anyway, so
he should have just pulled him down and faced the concequences but
outside the box.
Wouters should also have been sent off, the ref obviousley saw
something as he gave a free kick. Gascoigne was playing well, Wouters
new exaclty what he was doing.
The group is very tight now, and the pressure is on England, as we now
face 4 away games and only Poland at home.
Dave...
|
129.339 | Norway in 5 weeks | FORTY2::ROBERTSON | Living with Flamingos on the DELTA | Thu Apr 29 1993 14:30 | 38 |
| Do FIFA do what the FA does as concerning trial by television. If so I think
Wauters should be s***ing himself. That challange on Gascoigne was the most
blatant of its kind I've seen, and he should be punished for it. He was lucky
he didn't break Gazza's jaw.
A good game for England, Great start, but very disappointing to give away a 2
goal lead. Barnes Free kick was excellent, and the 2nd was well worked, with a
good strikers finish.
Bergkamp's goal oozed class, and it had to be said that Holland deserved the
goal. However, although I have no argument about the penalty (I think Walker was
very lucky to play 90 minutes), Holland didn't deserve the draw, on the balance
of play in the second half.
Ferdinand should have booked himself a permanent place in the team on his
performance. Only by being fouled ( should have been a penalty ) and an
excellent last gasp tackle did the Dutch keep him from scoring.
Palmer was superb. No he can't pass. Yes he looks awkward on the ball. But he
was always in the thick of the action, causing problems for the Dutch.
I was disappointed with Merson, especially after his performance last week. He
seemed too intent on going for the glory than playing the easy ball.
Gullit & Rijkard were invisible for most of the game, which shows what a good
job the defense did at keeping them out.
It was the first game I've seen since getting Sky Sports, and I think
I'll stick to the radio commentry. What is Andy Gray on????
disappointing score from the Stadium of light though.
Other results in the group yesterday.
Norway 3 - 1 Turkey
Poland 1 - 0 San Marino
Al
|
129.340 | | ARNIES::SMITHP1 | What became of the Rumbleows Cup ? | Thu Apr 29 1993 14:32 | 4 |
|
Very well summed up Al, especially the bit about Andy Gray.
p1
|
129.341 | Are we suitable for US '94 ? | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Thu Apr 29 1993 14:42 | 21 |
| Mike, you like some dutch coffee with your hat ????? ;-)
Great game, what an opening, what an end. You can discuss a lot of
things that happened during the play but I think the overall result was
a deserved result for both teams (though lucky, I must admit).
It was a very sportive event, it didn't deserve any red or yellow cards
at all. Also not in the end at the penalty. Normally referees give that
card but it was absolutely not necessairy to give a card. And he didn't
do that. In the beginning I thought it was going to be a big score for
England. After that quick goal it didn't look good, I think our coach
had a little bit to optimistic (=attacking) team in the field. After
the gate was a bit more closed, the dutch could give some resistance.
But playing their own football, thanks to the english this never
occurred........Two brilliant moments were however enough to make even.
I am looking forward to the homeplay !
Talking about Wouters, didn't one of you mention before that Bergkamp
and Gullit would be kicked out ?????? And now you've problems with that
high jump from Wouters ?????? ;-)
John
|
129.342 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | | Thu Apr 29 1993 14:54 | 19 |
| I don't know. What is Dutch coffee like?
I am trying to be objective about the game. From a neutral standpoint I would
have to say that England deserved two points, if not more.
No-one deserved a yellow card? Surely some mistake. Wouters should be banned
forever for what was a deliberate attempt to take a player that was running rings
round the Dutch defence out of the game.
Bergkamp was okay I suppose, and Obermaas (sp? probably not even close) was very
fast, but Gullit and Rijkaard were never in it. One of the best bits of the game
was watching supposed donkey Carlton Palmer breeze past supposed football genius
Dennis Bergkamp.
We'll pan you in the return leg if we have Gazza.
Bad luck though. we'll send you a postcard from the USA.
Mike
|
129.343 | re: .342 | JGO::ARTZ | | Thu Apr 29 1993 15:24 | 7 |
| If panning Holland depends on wether this Gazza guy plays or not, then
you don't have a team.......
Gerard
p.s. I agree Wouters should have had a card for that, but let's be
fair, Gazza isn't an angel either...
|
129.344 | GT (middle name begin with `i' by chance?) | HEART::DIDCOCK | | Thu Apr 29 1993 15:33 | 18 |
|
Not sure about Gazza running rings round anyone, but he was badly
missed in the second half. Graham Taylor's decisions are usually very
hard to fathom, but the combination of Palmer, Ince, Barnes and Gazza
worked very well, a couple of ball-winners (Palmer came up with the
ball from numerous challenges) and a couple of footballers. (I think
Clough might have been a better replacement for Gazza?)
Agree with earlier comment re: Les Ferdinand - the team need his
pace (and workrate) - he should keep his place.
Graham Taylor seems to be acquiring a sense of humour too -
interviewed after the game on sportsnight
Reporter: "Would you say the first dutch goal was the turning point?"
GT: "Well it didn't help"
Cliff
|
129.345 | living by the sword.. | ESSB::BREE | | Thu Apr 29 1993 15:33 | 11 |
| Why all the fuss about the injury to Gascoigne?
If I recall correctly he was the guy who committed some atrocious fouls
in the 1991 cup final before self inflicting.
Part of his trade is physical presence and he seems to revel in it.
The old saying, "don't give it if you can't take it" would seem
applicable.
Paul
|
129.346 | Wouters should have seen red | YUPPY::PATEMAN | Scuba Dive in my Think Tank | Thu Apr 29 1993 16:11 | 26 |
| The "fuss" is about a deliberate elbow in the face that was thought to
have broken someones cheek bone. Yes gazza did commit a couple of fouls
in the Cup Final and would have been punished if the ref hadn't been a
total dork.
However, Gazza is not known as deliberately dirty. For once I agree
with Jimmy Hill that Wouters committed an act of "thuggery". In the
Premier League, video evidence would have him banned for several games,
I hope FIFA think about similar tactics.
The Dutch looked to have a number of average and past their sell by
date players. England looked a couple of players short of a very classy
act. They need a better right back (Rob Jones?) and a real left back
(Stuart Pearce), plus a wide player. Barnes did well but was still only
around about 70% of the time. A fit John Salako, Lee Sharpe or Tony
Daley would give a better balance. Shearer will also lead the line a
bit better (although Ferdinand did well, he is not a prolific scorer)
Personally, I would prefer Seaman or Martyn to Woods but there is
little to choose. Woods is a bit weak in the "kick from a back pass"
department.
Still, good game, generally good performance and I don't think England
have to worry overly much about going to Poland and Norway.
Paul
|
129.347 | Hup Holland | GALVIA::SPAIN | There's always the U.S. | Thu Apr 29 1993 16:11 | 11 |
|
I saw the last 15 minutes on SKY and the highlights on BBC. When Peter
Van Vossen scored the penalty the whole pub erupted. I never knew
there were so many Dutchmen in Galway. :-)
From what I saw England deserved to win but they threw it away. They
have an uphill battle now to qualify. England have only beaten Turkey
and San Marino. 2 draws at home to Holland and Norway does not inspire
confidence. Group tables can be very deceptive.
Gary.
|
129.348 | | TRUCKS::SANT | Nostalgia *is* what it used to be... | Thu Apr 29 1993 18:22 | 23 |
|
re .347...
Big deal, Gary..I can't imagine many Englishmen give a bugger
how many NON-ENGLISH (as this is what it amounts to..) people
there were in a pub in Galway last night 8-(
They're all as bad as boned-headed English "supporters" who revel
in other Home Nations misery...I'm suprised - I thought that sort
of crap was beneath you.
England played quite well. Holland deserved the draw for playing
for 90 minutes rather than 87. We missed Gazza in the second half,
nasty elbow from Wouters but if it was Adams it would "all be part
of the game". On balance we were well worth a point.
Nothing to worry about. If we put that side out on the park for
the remaining ties in this group we will qualify. Yes, I know that
means a reprieve for Barnes, but I admit it - he played well!
Ince was superb. Bergkamp was excellent - what a goal.
Andy.
|
129.349 | Though given half the chance :-) | FORTY2::ROBERTSON | Living with Flamingos on the DELTA | Thu Apr 29 1993 18:40 | 11 |
| re -.1
>> We missed Gazza in the second half, nasty elbow from Wouters but if it was
>> Adams it would "all be part of the game"
Andy,
Even if it had been Jeremy Beadle, Wouters action against Gascoigne has
absolutely no place on the Football field, and FIFA should do something to stop
players thinking they can get away with it, even if the ref didn't see it.
Al
|
129.350 | | TRUCKS::SANT | Nostalgia *is* what it used to be... | Thu Apr 29 1993 18:48 | 13 |
|
Al, I agree. I didn't condone what Wouters did.
However, I stand by what I said. We are very qucik to cry "foul"
if it's against us, but our own players have done similar things
and it's suddenly "a man's game", "accidental clash of heads",
"tried to play the ball"...etc. Chose one of those.
If we really want trial by FIFA/TV/other, we'd better understand
the full implications.
Andy.
|
129.351 | WHAT ????? | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Apr 29 1993 19:25 | 14 |
| Re-1
Andy..
That is rubbish....When Terry Butcher head butted a player a couple of
years ago playing for England he was slaughtered in the papers.
Despite all the b*locks written in here, no player would have been
defended for doing anything like Wouters did last night.
Dave...
|
129.352 | | SUBURB::COMMIT | Commit Group | Thu Apr 29 1993 19:41 | 14 |
| Re 348
As much as I hate to say it but I have to agree with Andy at the start
of his mail. As a moderator I feel Gary should show more responsability
instead of trying to start more home nation arguments.
Well done Andy.
Unfortunatly though your comments about Tony Adams was complete crap.
Thanks All
Barry
|
129.353 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Thu Apr 29 1993 19:54 | 4 |
|
Andy..
Are you really as boring as you make out...
|
129.354 | | PEKING::WARBURTONG | Is it herbal deficiency Doc??! | Thu Apr 29 1993 20:13 | 31 |
|
Why do the Irish/Foreigners slag off English football when most of
them support English teams . No wonder teams like Cork City & Derry
City will never win anything good . They don't get the support because
the whole of the bloody country wants to come over and watch the likes
of Leeds & Everton play.
If your going to slag off the England team then why bother coming
other here at all to watch domestic matches , after all Chelsea , Leeds
and Everton fans etc should show a bit of loyalty.
Warbutong
|
129.355 | | TRUCKS::SANT | Nostalgia *is* what it used to be... | Thu Apr 29 1993 20:14 | 6 |
129.356 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | | Thu Apr 29 1993 20:44 | 31 |
| Re: -2
I think the reason that all these people slag off the English national side
but still support English league teams is the simple fact that their own
players are crap. The Republic only started winning when Big Jack took over and
scrounged his team from the castoffs of the English league. Similarly how many
of the Welsh team actually play in the Welsh league? Answer: none.
The only exception to this is Scotland, and we don't need to say anything about
the state of their national team...
This is not to say that Irish players or Welsh players are crap themselves, just
that all the ones who are even half decent play in the English league because
the domestic leagues are rubbish.
Be honest. Could you bear to support Inter Cardiff when you have real quality
football just down the road in the English league?
I think recent results have shown that of the home countries only England can
seriously be considered a decent footballing nation, while Scotland, Wales, and
Northern Ireland are forever doomed to languish among the Maltas and San Marinos
of the world. Never mind lads. We won't mind you all flocking to our cause in
94. 8-)
Note that I exclude the Republic from the last generalisation, although I am
confident that if they didn't get all their players from the English league via
dubious ancestral connections with Ireland, they too would be an easy 2 points.
No offence intended. Just my humble opinion. 8-)
Mike
|
129.357 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | | Thu Apr 29 1993 20:45 | 6 |
| Oops sorry. That should be "their own leagues are crap."
-------
many apologies.
Mike
|
129.358 | In defence of Inter Cardiff | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | on the Streets of San Francisco | Thu Apr 29 1993 20:54 | 9 |
| Mike,
What are you trying to say - Inter Cardiff knocked Cardiff City out of
the Welsh Cup and it looks as if Cardiff City might win the English
3rd Division.
regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
129.359 | Why Scotland and Wales but not England | GALVIA::SPAIN | There's always the U.S. | Thu Apr 29 1993 22:41 | 35 |
|
There is a vast gulf in standards between the English league and the
leagues here in Ireland or Wales. I don't think anyone would dispute
the fact. Most people here support English football teams. We get
British television and there is huge interest in the English league.
This should logically translate into support for the English national
team. Certainly virtually everyone here would support Scotland or
Wales against continental opposition.
There is a minority of people in this country who hate everything
English but they also hate football because it is seen as an English
game. Most Irish fans dislike the English national team because of the
incredible arrogance of sections of the media - Jimmy Hill,John Motson
et al. Other examples of this can be found in this conference. If you
don't know what I mean ask some of the Rangers fans. It can get a bit
tiresome listening to how wonderful England are.
England played very well last night. Judging from the highlights they
should have won the game. It should have been Taylor's finest hour and
yet it has turned out to be a very bad result which leaves
qualification in doubt.Peter Van Vossen has saved us hours of talk
about how they're going to win the world cup.
I know the goal must have been a sickening blow to the many decent
English fans. i know how they feel and I've felt the same way myself
in the past. But at the arrogant neanderthal minority all i can do is
laugh.
BTW Holland are one of my favourite International sides anyway. I do
hope they qualify and I generally want them to win even when they don't
play England. Most Irish fans would have similar sympathies for the
Dutch and this made the equaliser all the sweeter.
Gary.
|
129.360 | Well said that man. | YELBUS::DSMITH | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRAT | Thu Apr 29 1993 23:54 | 11 |
|
Well said Gary, I guess most football fans north of the border would echo
most of what you have said.
Personally, I thought England played very well last night and deserved to
win the game, but I'm afraid I cannot wish them good luck in their future
matches. However, I will say I'm glad Scotland don't have to meet them in
the near future!!!
Danny.
|
129.361 | Saxons & Celts! | SUBURB::ONEILLS | | Fri Apr 30 1993 02:11 | 28 |
| Mike,
I watched the game in my local last night with a SPanish
colleague...and guess who we were secretly cheering for!
Frankly, I was amazed at the quality of England's performance. However
I was even more amazed to see one of the audience jump in delight at
the first Dutch goal...turns out he was a Scot...and guess
what...Scotland's score came across the screen in sharp bursts soon
after. He who laughs last...no harm in a bit of fun at the end of the
day.
On the subject of ancestry, take a look at the England team at least
half of whom could hardly be described as Saxons! It's getting tiring
listening to the moans about the Irish team's ancestry...maybe it's
because they are anything but an easy two points. If their parents are
Irish so are they no matter where they live...simple as that.
By the way, I thought England deserved to win last night.
Shane
|
129.362 | GAZZA BEWARE! WOUTERS...CRACK!! | KBOMFG::KOEPPE | Think Imaginary... | Fri Apr 30 1993 11:18 | 16 |
| Last night I saw the foul on Gazza on SKY NEWS and, as a neutral
observer in this case ;-), I must say that it was an awful attack
and Wouters certainly deserves a punishment.
Before I saw it on telly, I thought it was one of those clashes as
in the Euro Championship match between Germany and Scotland, but
Wouters knocked him deliberately by taking a swing before hitting
him.
Apparently, Gazza has broken his cheekbone and will quite likely
miss the next two qualification matches. I guess had the blow been
further down, he would have broken a few ribs instead. :-(
Perhaps it would be a good idea to ban Wouters for the same amount
of matches as Gazza is missing.
Just my opinion,
Eduard
|
129.363 | | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Fri Apr 30 1993 11:55 | 21 |
|
I caught a bit on the news last night that Gazza needs an operation
on his cheek, can anyone confirm this ?. More importantly will he miss
any of the qualifiers coming up..
Re: last few.
This is getting really boring, frankly I and many others don't care
what you think, regarding the commentators many of us find them
irriating, but most of them are English WHY shouldn't they shout for
there Country. I seem to remember a certain Jack Charlton creaming his
pants over John Seridan in a recent televised game, quite frankly he was
embarrasing but the only reason he done it was because he played for
the Republic. What are you saying that we should have neutral
commentators, some how I don't think so, imagine a Scottish commentator
we would have to have subtitles, it's bad enough watching Taggert....
Neil...
|
129.364 | Who's running this show anyway | UNTADH::BIRSE | Testa OSI Investigation team | Fri Apr 30 1993 12:19 | 12 |
|
re. -1
Doesn't seem to be a problem for your players. They seem to be able to
understand :
Alex Ferguson, Kenny Dalglish, George Graham etc....
:^)...
|
129.365 | TMOFITW - FAZZA | STKOFF::SPERSSON | Pas de probleme | Fri Apr 30 1993 12:27 | 17 |
|
Three observations:
1) Before I started following football notes, I could sometimes cheer
for England. Now I want them to lose almost as badly as Denmark. What do
you think is the reason,::BAREFIELDA, ::COSSYEN et al?
2) Commentators on national TV are biased towards the national team. In
most countries this is no problem because an overwhelming majority of
the viewers of national TV are biased towards the national team too. In
the UK however, the national TV covers the area of 4-5 national teams,
which causes most of the debate exemplified lately (and we've seen it
many times before, do you remember the 'Great Walt Gallacher Crusade'
in '90). There is only one solution to the situation: allow only ONE
national team per national TV coverage area.
3) Poor Wouters. I hope he didn't hurt his elbow.
|
129.366 | There's Scottish Jocks and your English Jocks!! | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Fri Apr 30 1993 12:29 | 9 |
|
Re: 1
They are English Jocks, you can also add to that list Dennis Law,
Alan Hansen Andy Gray and Ian St John who all say "we" when refering to
England... It's quite funny listening to them...
Neil...
|
129.367 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Fri Apr 30 1993 12:41 | 23 |
|
What it comes down to is this. Some of the Irish think they are better
than England because they beat us 5 years ago in Stuttgart. Since then
we have been in their group in both major competitions and finished
above them both times and gone further than them in both competions,
but they still think they are better than us. We can except they are a
very hard team to beat, ask any of the Countries that are in their
group, they dont lose very often, but then again they dont win that
often either against good teams.
Then we get the same old rubbish about the media being bised towards
England, very strange that, English people being biased towards the
English....whatever next.
As for the Scottish, well they come out with comments like "atleast we
can accept we are crap"...very true, but the reason we dont is because we
like it or not we arent. "crap" teams get beat by Costa Rica and
thrashed by Portugal.
Who cares if you dont like England, keep on not liking England, our
team is gettiung better and better, and your bitterness is going to get
worse and worse.
Dave...
|
129.368 | Staying home with Scotland?? | SUBURB::SWAINM | | Fri Apr 30 1993 14:17 | 6 |
| Bearing in mind the fact that all of our next games are abroad to tough
opposition, what are the chances of England qualifying for USA.
Comments from Scots, Irish, anyone welcome - after all we are all
entitled to an oppinion.
Matt.
|
129.369 | | FORTY2::ROBERTSON | Living with Flamingos on the DELTA | Fri Apr 30 1993 14:20 | 15 |
| >> Re: 1
>> They are English Jocks, you can also add to that list Dennis Law,
>> Alan Hansen Andy Gray and Ian St John who all say "we" when refering to
>> England... It's quite funny listening to them...
>> Neil...
They are not "English Jocks", they are British. Like the majority of BRITISH
people, though there are probably many that wouldn't admit it, they actually
support all the teams in the British Isles. Probably the only time they don't
want England to win is when they are playing Scotland.
Al
|
129.370 | Still on course...but ? | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Fri Apr 30 1993 14:28 | 12 |
|
Its not worth saying it going to be easy, because it isnt. We now need
3 points from the next two games, 4 would be brilliant but very
difficult. We are still in a good position despite the draw. Holland
have played a game more, have already lost in Norway and drawn at home
to Poland.
We've made it difficult for ourselves now, we should have won all our
games, but we didnt, If we pick up 3 points in Poland and Norway,
preferably beating Norway, we can still qualify. I'm not panicking...YET.
Dave...
|
129.371 | | BUSSTP::DREES | Three good buddies were... | Fri Apr 30 1993 14:37 | 17 |
|
Chaps...chaps...chaps....
All this "we hate you 'cause you hate us" crap is getting a bit
tiresome. Can we try and get back to some resonably, intelligent
noting. I enjoy most of the banter but some of the recent notes
have been nothing more than childish.
Ok....now I'm off my soapbox I have to say that I think England,
even though 3 of their last 4 games are away, have an excellent
chance of going to the USA. If they can perform to the same standard
as Wednesday night the games in Norway and Poland should yield at least
3pts from 4. As a scot thats as unbiased as I can get.
Del.
|
129.372 | It's going to be very tight | GALVIA::SPAIN | There's always the U.S. | Fri Apr 30 1993 14:47 | 30 |
|
Here's how I see it.
Despite only dropping 1 point (away to Holland) I still don't think
Poland will qualify.
I think 15 points are needed to qualify.
England should beat San Marino away and Poland at home. They need 2
points from the trips to Poland and Norway - anything better and you
can book your tickets. They may still need a draw in Holland. That
will become clearer in the Autumn.
I think Holland will beat Norway. They will probably need to beat
England as well and draw in Poland.
Norway should draw with England,lose in Norway and will have more
problems beating Poland than the other 2 nations.
Holland have lost in Norway and drawn at home to Poland. They need
those points back. England have drawn at home to Norway and Holland.
Norway have done everything that has been asked of them so far by
beating the Dutch and drawing at Wembley. Norway are currently in the
strongest position but their games v England and Holland in June will
tell a lot.
It's at least 2 from 3, possibly 2 from 4. I think it's going to be
very tight. It may come down to goal difference.
Gary.
|
129.373 | AT least we wont have to listen to Gazza talk... | DBOT07::RUSSELL | | Fri Apr 30 1993 14:53 | 34 |
| Guys,
As an Irishman, I have to admit we were fortunate to scrape a draw
against the Danes...whoops wrong note, so easy to get confused.
As regards England V Holland. I like the Dutch. They are a style team.
Bergkamp's goal was beautiful. But so was Barnes' goal. And Finally
even the Dutch were copious in their compliments of Carlton Palmer, a
player who's virtues I have been lauding for many years.
England were unlucky to only draw. They need a bit more guile in
defence to halt the likes of Obermaas and Bergkamp. They need a Baresi
type figure. From midfield up they played fine. I don't see Poland
causing them difficulty. They never have in the (recent) past, and Jan
Tomaschevski is long gone. Norway and Holland in their home stadia are
going to be MUCH more daunting, especially with a fit Van Baesten
playing.
It's going to be very tight. Also, IMHO, Walker should have walked for
the penalty. Obermaas was clear in on goal. The rule is stupid, but
consistency is needed.
Can someone post the table, and the fixture list? I know England play
away in Poland and Norway at the end of May and start of June. When is
the game in Holland.
Good luck to England, the WC finals wouldnt be the same without them.
After all, we'd miss listening to Jimmy Hill and The Venerable Terry,
wouldnt we...? And we'd miss the great Carlton slagging Jimmy Hill etc
for not backing the team. That was a great bit of telly, that was..8^)
luv,
Tiger
|
129.374 | | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Fri Apr 30 1993 14:56 | 15 |
|
re:.371. I couldn't agree more,
Regarding the injury to Gazza it's not as serious as first thought,
he will only be out of action for a least two weeks. So hopefully
he will be fit for the two qualifiers at the end of the month.
Looking at the table it's not going to be easy, we end up in this
position everytime when we have to win the last game to qualify, which
we always seem to manage to do. This time we have San Marino in the
final fixture IF it goes to the last fixture I know which team I would
rather be playing. To be honest I expect England to have secured a
place to the finals by then.....
Neil..
|
129.375 | Grow up !!! | IMAPC::MURRAY | Innovation stops at I.S. !!!! | Fri Apr 30 1993 17:47 | 12 |
|
Children, children.....
Apart from a few exceptions I wouldn't be suprised if the average
mental age of most football noters was less than 10.
Your crap, he's crap etc is vocabulary that most kids of primary school
age could better.
JMHO
Paul
|
129.376 | | UNTADH::WILCOCKSON | SWFC FA CUP 93 | Fri Apr 30 1993 17:55 | 6 |
|
Don't talk crap Paul! :^)
Al (age 7).
|
129.377 | | IMAPC::MURRAY | Innovation stops at I.S. !!!! | Fri Apr 30 1993 17:58 | 4 |
|
My daddies bigger than yours crapface
Paul (age 42)
|
129.378 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Fri Apr 30 1993 19:49 | 15 |
|
Lets have a end to all this stupid nonsense, this topic is
called "world cup group two"..
I dont see our great team have to much trouble brushing aside
all the other teams in our group. England showed the other night
that they are a world class side and any team will have to do
their best to beat them.
I cant understand why Des Walker didn't kick that Dutch
foward into row Z of the stand before he got into the box, O.K
he would of been given the red card and missed a game but at
least we would have won...
Andy.B
|
129.379 | ahhhhh....hold your horses! | DBOT07::RUSSELL | | Fri Apr 30 1993 20:21 | 14 |
| andy,
hate to dosappoint you, old bean, bu this topic is called;
"World Cup Qualifying Group Two"
By stating that its called "World Cup Group two" you are possibly in
danger of assuming that England will, or have already, qualified for
the Final Phase of the World Cup.
Just thought I'd point it out, old fruit.
Cheers,
*Tiger*
|
129.380 | Foot-in-mouth-disease ??? | AYOV16::KMCCLELLAND | The Honest Truth | Fri Apr 30 1993 20:22 | 27 |
| re last
Note 129.378 World Cup qualifying Group 2 378 of 378
PEKING::BAREFIELDA "JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE" 15 lines 30-APR-1993 15:49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Lets have a end to all this stupid nonsense, this topic is
>>called "world cup group two"..
Couldn't agree more.
>>I cant understand why Des Walker didn't kick that Dutch
>>foward into row Z of the stand before he got into the box, O.K
>>he would of been given the red card and missed a game but at
>>least we would have won...
>>Andy.B
Errrr Andy.B Can you go back and read the first line of your note and
then ask yourself if this type of garbage/Chelsea tactics deserves to
be called sense or nonsense........
Just a thought...
Kev...
|
129.381 | Talk sense or dont bother... | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Fri Apr 30 1993 21:06 | 10 |
| What would you prefer..
A. England win 2-1 with Walker being sent off.
OR
B. Just claiming 1 point.
Foot in mouth, looks like you could definately get your foot in
your mouth ... I bet!!!!
|
129.382 | Just a thought. | BUSSTP::DSMITH | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRAT | Sat May 01 1993 00:03 | 12 |
|
re last
Personally, I would prefer option B.
By the way, what's all this talk about Gazza having a sore/broken
cheekbone. I'm sure it's all a ploy by his marketing agent to drum
up some sympathy. After all, you would need a sledgehammer to get
through the excess fat before connecting with any of fatties bones.
Danny.
|
129.383 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE | Sat May 01 1993 11:49 | 2 |
|
The jocks would give their right arm to have a player like Gazza...
|
129.384 | paardekop | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Mon May 03 1993 11:04 | 10 |
| <<< Note 129.383 by PEKING::BAREFIELDA "JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE" >>>
>> The jocks would give their right arm to have a player like Gazza...
Andy,
didn't you gave your d*ck when Gazza started playing for England :-)
T_
|
129.385 | How to write dutch names well ! | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Mon May 03 1993 12:18 | 11 |
| Just for the decent language in the coming notes :
Wrong Right
----- -----
van Baesten = van Basten
Obermaas = Overmars ( love to hear how you pronounce that one !)
Bergkamp = Bergkamp
Wouters = Wouters ( thanks for the concern, his elbow is o.k.)
Now don't let me see anyone of you make faults again in writing dutch
names. With a little luck you don't have to write them in '94, US....
|
129.386 | Shuddupa ya face.....8^) | DBOT07::RUSSELL | | Mon May 03 1993 15:27 | 8 |
| re last one....
Question; How can "Wouters" be both wrong AND right??
Answer; When he commits a foul, but when other player is Gazza its
ok.....
I notice it didnt stop Gazza talking on the "Gazzetta" on Channel 4....
|
129.387 | | GVA02::LAINSBURY | Top 6 by May | Mon May 03 1993 17:04 | 3 |
| How long is Gazza out for ?
Cheers
|
129.388 | | FORTY2::ASH | Grahame Ash @REO | Thu May 06 1993 17:45 | 4 |
| Gazza's hoping to make the Lazio game on 23 May - just in time for the
England games
g
|
129.389 | Does anybody care? | GLDOA::BOSSONNEY | | Tue May 11 1993 00:31 | 4 |
| What were the results of Norway-Turkey and Poland-San Marino which I
understand were also played on April 28?
Jacques
|
129.390 | Pointer | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | on the Streets of San Francisco | Tue May 11 1993 00:36 | 1 |
| they're hidden at the bottom of reply .339
|
129.391 | Getting tight | DBOT07::RUSSELL | | Thu May 20 1993 14:31 | 12 |
|
Result from 19-May-93
San Marino 0 - 3 Poland.
This puts Poland within a point of England and Holland, with a 1 game
advantage over the former and a two game advantage over the latter.
cheers,
*Tiger*
|
129.392 | The next two weeks can decide the group... | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu May 27 1993 16:25 | 40 |
|
A very important time for England in the next 5 days, it could make or
break the qualification for USA 94.
First game on Saturday in Poland (Live ITV 19:15), we always seem to
get Poland in our group and they have been quietly picking up points
and are right in there at the moment. It looks like Teddy Sheringham
will make his debut alongside David Platt in attack, as Les Ferdinand
is struggling with a back injury. Ian Wright is fit, but according to
the papers today, GT is going to give Sheringham the nod if Ferdinand
doesnt make it. Tony Dorigo also returns after injury at left back so
the team will probably read:
Woods
Dixon
Dorigo
Adams
Walker
Palmer
Ince
Gascoigne
Barnes
Platt
Sheringham
On Wednesday England travel to Norway for the second game, Norway have
been doing very well at home and really can book there place if they
beat England. If they lose to England, then they have to travel to
Holland a week later, facing the fact that if they lose to the Dutch,
they are basically out after a good start.
3 Points would be a good performance, 4 would be brilliant, but
anything less and we are struggling and relying on other teams dropping
points. With a home game with Poland and the away fixture in San Marino
to come for England, two wins can almost certainly qualify us but I'll
go for a win on Poland and a draw in Norway, leaving the group still
wide open.
Dave...
|
129.393 | The Masked Man is World Class!! | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Fri May 28 1993 18:06 | 17 |
|
Tomorrow see's the start of what is an important few days for England.
Away games against Poland and Norway if the what the papers are saying
is true then I expect 2 wins but I will settle for 1 win and draw, this
time next week England could almost be on there way to the states..
The game is on live tomorrow so, the whole Country can assess how good
the currant team is compared to the side that finished the fourth best
team in the world in the last Championship. Personally, Taylor's got a
good team spirit within the side so I' going to stick my neck out and go
for two England victorys. This will leave us to get one more victory in
our last remaining games. No problem....
Poland 0 England 2
Norway 1 England 3
Neil..
|
129.394 | one man team | PLUNDR::MORAN | Tripple ripple truffle shuffler | Fri May 28 1993 18:20 | 4 |
|
I'll go for a couple of 1-1 draws. Much depends on Gazza, as per usual.
Tim
|
129.395 | | TRUCKS::SANT | This is as good as it gets! | Fri May 28 1993 18:44 | 5 |
|
Me too, though the best chance ofa win will be in Poland and we
may get a shock in Norway!
Andy.
|
129.396 | | SUBURB::WAITEG | I WON'T DO WHAT YOU TELL ME | Fri May 28 1993 18:51 | 7 |
| I think England will get a draw in Poland and will then go on and beat
Norway 3-1. A lot depends Gascoigne.
Gary
|
129.397 | Good Luck from the Irish. | DBOT07::RUSSELL | WEXFORD...ALL-IRELAND S.H. CHAMPIONS, 1993 | Fri May 28 1993 20:31 | 7 |
| Good Luck.
It'll be no fun is the USA without you....
8^)
*Tiger*
|
129.398 | | BLKPUD::WATTERSONP | All my failings exposed | Fri May 28 1993 20:45 | 7 |
|
Tiger,
remind us Ireland's brilliant performances in the 1992 European
championship finals in Sweden...............
Paul ;-)
|
129.399 | | BUSSTP::DSMITH | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRAT | Fri May 28 1993 22:41 | 8 |
|
re last
Almost as good as England's performances..
Danny :-) :-)
|
129.400 | | BHUNA::AMILLAR | And some late news just in... | Sat May 29 1993 00:29 | 5 |
|
I go for 3 - 1 to Poland, and 1-0 to Norway.
Archie
|
129.401 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Sat May 29 1993 13:34 | 8 |
|
Re.399
And England's performance has striking similaraties to Ireland's
performance in Italy, we drew all our games and then went out to the
host nation by the odd goal.
Dave...
|
129.402 | | MASALA::AMILLAR | And some late news just in... | Sun May 30 1993 03:28 | 5 |
|
What was tonight's score?
Archie
|
129.403 | 1-1 | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Sun May 30 1993 11:59 | 7 |
| According to the Swiss version of 'Ceefax' it was 1-1 with
the Poles scoring first half and Wright scoring the equaliser
in the 84th minute....
England must really now win in Norway....
_dom
|
129.404 | | BUSSTP::DREES | | Sun May 30 1993 14:01 | 12 |
|
Ian Wright saved lucky England last night.
Poland were strolling to victory and really should have had the points
well rapped up before Wright equalised. Chris Woods had a string of
fine saves and that, coupled with very poor finishing by the Polish
centre Lesniak, kept England's hopes of qualification alive.
England now really need to win in Norway. They'll go into that match
without Paul Ince who was booked last night.
Del.
|
129.405 | got out oj jail | DBOT07::RUSSELL | WEXFORD...ALL-IRELAND S.H. CHAMPIONS, 1993 | Mon May 31 1993 13:40 | 18 |
| Thanks to good old UTV,I saw the game on saturday night. Poland should
have been 3 up before Wright scored a brilliant goal. England deserved
a goal due to the pressure they put the Poles under. But Really!!!
Those misses in the first minute of the game and in the second half!!!
What Can you say...honestly England were dead jammy to get that point.
Wrights goal reminded me of Lineker's first ( I Think) against Poland
in WC96 against Poland also. Fantastic opportunist shot.
I would hate to be that Polish striker who missed those two sitters!!!
The Poles were technically brilliant and regularly carved the Englsih
midfield and defence wide open. It was a rough game, with some vicious
tackling on both sides.
Is the Norway game live on ITV also??? Hope so. Its great to give the
thumbs down to SKY!!!
*Tiger*
|
129.406 | Norway should watch out | ESSB::BREE | | Mon May 31 1993 15:34 | 9 |
| I heard the second half is on live on BBC.
England will have to consider that a point gained as they could well
have lost 3-0.
Having said that Norway could feel a backlash on Wednesday and
shouldn't be too complacent.
Paul
|
129.407 | Go for it, Norway! | KIRKTN::AMILLAR | And some late news just in... | Tue Jun 01 1993 01:02 | 8 |
|
It may also mean that Norway will lift their game, knowing now that
England are beatable.
Norway to win 1-0
Archie
|
129.408 | Point gained from a sh*t performance... | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Tue Jun 01 1993 12:41 | 19 |
|
No doubt about it we were lucky. We didnt play well at all, and it has
to go down as a point gained. Poland had two clear chances, the one in
the first minute was a terrible miss, and Chris Woods made up for his
error by making a good save after he decided to pass to the Polish
foward from a back pass.
I think its about time Des Walker got "rested". He needs to get his
form back together again, he is making to many mistakes now.
Great goal from Wright......lets hope thats the first of many for
England, starting on Wednesday.
We will need to play much better than that against Norway, lets face it
we really need a win now. A draw is'nt the end of the world but it would
mean us relying on other teams dropping points.
Dave...
|
129.409 | Norwege zwei point???? | ESSB::BREE | | Tue Jun 01 1993 13:38 | 10 |
| I don't think a draw would be too bad. After all you haven't lost a
game yet, you've put 6 past one team and it doesn't matter whether
you come out first or second, does it?
I think England will definitely qualify though possibly not as group
winners. This is good because the World Cup wouldn't be the same
without you :-) :-)and especially Jimmy Hill!!!
Paul
|
129.410 | | TRUCKS::SANT | This is as good as it gets! | Tue Jun 01 1993 13:56 | 22 |
|
A draw in Oslo will be Ok. Not brilliant, but not a disaster
either. A win will put us in the driving seat in this group.
How we got a point in Poland is still a mystery, as was the total
inability of the Swiss referee to adequately punish some awful
challenges.
Wright's goal was superb. The pub went wild 8-)
Barnes is a numpty and should be dropped forever. Walker has now
been "average" for half a season - according to Sampdoria and what
I've seen of him - and maybe it's time for a change. Pallister gets
my vote. Keep Bardsley and Dorrigo in. Shoot Palmer for being a
prat, and Ince for being a cretin and getting booked.
Team for Norway game:
Woods, Bardsley, Dorrigo, Batty, Pallister, Adams, Sharpe, Platt,
Ferdinand, Wright, Gascoigne.
Andy.
|
129.411 | You'll never beat Des Walker...??????????????? | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Tue Jun 01 1993 14:23 | 18 |
|
Andy..
The problem with playing Pallister with Adams is the lack of pace, if
we get with our two full backs to far up field, we might get exposed,
although Adams looks pretty secure nowdays ( err I cant believe I said
that), you need some pace. I would play Keown with Adams, he has some
pace, and is also a good man marker.
What about Teddy...?, he did ok and deserves another chance. I would
agree about Barnes, time has surely run out now, lets see Lee Sharpe
have a run, atleast he might get some crosses over to give Teddy
Sheringham (if he plays) some chance. He wasnt given any service on
Saturday.
I hope all this about Taylor dropping Gascoigne is just a smokescreen..
Dave...
|
129.412 | | TRUCKS::SANT | This is as good as it gets! | Tue Jun 01 1993 14:30 | 11 |
|
Fair comment Dave. It simply came down to the fact that Wright
scored in 20 minutes and Sherringham didn't in 90, but he did
do enough to suggest that he can handle international football.
I'd have him on the bench with Clough.
I think Taylor will stick with Sherringham too, with Wright still
on the bench, but it's just the side that I'd play at the moment.
Andy.
|
129.413 | If we're making changes... | UNTADH::WILCOCKSON | Back in Schlagrahmland | Tue Jun 01 1993 18:50 | 7 |
|
I didn't see the game (I wuz on holiday), but I read a few back that
Woods made a bad mistake. He seems to make silly mistakes a bit too
often for my liking (I'm an Owls fan!). I think Seaman looks more
secure, but not as flashy, so I'd play Seaman in goal.
Al.
|
129.414 | Can't kick for toffee | YUPPY::PATEMAN | Scuba Dive in my Think Tank | Tue Jun 01 1993 19:46 | 7 |
| Ref Woods
My main criticism of him is that he has not adapted at all well to the
back pass rule. In comparison to Seaman and Martyn he is very poor at
kicking clear.
Paul
|
129.415 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | | Tue Jun 01 1993 19:46 | 20 |
| The best thing about Saturday's fiasco was seeing Taylor in a strop at half time.
8-) 8-)
Surely he must understand Barnes = Crap. It's a simple equation, and one which
the rest of the galaxy seems fairly at ease with.
I thought Bardsley was okay at attacking but he didn't appear to do a fat lot
in the way of actual defense.
Des Walker also needs a rest but I don't think we have got anyone to take his
place. Pallister is rubbish. Get Des back in English football and he'll be
back to his true form within months. He has just had a hard time getting used
to lower quality continental football. 8-) (flying in the face of reality)
Hows about:
Woods, Adams, Walker, Dorigo, Bardsley, Palmer, Gascoigne, Platt, Sharpe, Wright,
Sherringham/Ferdinand
Mike
|
129.416 | Look again..!! | OPG::TONY | | Tue Jun 01 1993 20:01 | 13 |
| Re. 415
>Des Walker also needs a rest but I don't think we have got anyone to take his
>place. Pallister is rubbish. Get Des back in English football and he'll be
>back to his true form within months. He has just had a hard time getting used
>to lower quality continental football. 8-) (flying in the face of reality)
Mike,
Pallister was ever-present in the United side this season in total of 50
games United conceeded 35 goals..I wouldn't call that rubbish..and I don't
mind him not being in the England team..
Tony
|
129.417 | Have Norway the "bottle"?? | SUBURB::ONEILLS | | Tue Jun 01 1993 22:27 | 9 |
| Enforced changes could actually work in Graham Taylor's changes as they
did in the past. I think England are strongest upfront where they have
several class strikers/attacking midfielders. Wright, Ferdinand, or
Sheringham with Sharpe on the left and Platt in midfield would probably
strengthen the side. Mark Hateley isn't even in the squad.
Great goal from "shoot on sight" Ian Wright.
Shane
|
129.418 | and why did they sign all of them? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Alphatraz - Coming Summer 93 | Tue Jun 01 1993 22:55 | 8 |
| assuming that this is in one of the English newspapers...
how many of the hundreds of Norwegians signed by English clubs this
past season are in the Norwegian team for tomorrow's game.
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
129.419 | a draw would be a very good result | GALVIA::SPAIN | There's always the U.S. | Tue Jun 01 1993 23:05 | 16 |
|
I think the fans are over reacting. A draw is Poland was a very good
result. I can't see Norway or Holland having it easy over there. I
think they've lost one home World Cup match..ever.
A draw in Norway would also be a very good result.
If England draw in Norway,win v Poland and San Marino and draw with
Holland they can only fail on goal difference and that's with just
about every result going against them.
A win in Norway would make things pretty easy. A defeat would really
put the cat among the pigeons. I think it'll be a draw and England will
qualify.
Gary.
|
129.420 | | TRUCKS::SANT | This is as good as it gets! | Wed Jun 02 1993 13:09 | 9 |
|
Exactly, Gary.....this obsession with expecting England to win
every game home and away is ridiculous. We haven't been beaten
yet. We'll be there provided it stays that way.
Andy.
|
129.421 | CLOUGHS THE MAN (Jnr) | MACNAS::SMORAN | | Wed Jun 02 1993 14:19 | 8 |
| What about giving Clough a chance. When he came on the last time he put
more passes together than the whole team did in the game. He may not
stand out as a Brill player but his incisive passes could swing a game.
England to draw and hopefully qualify - GOOD LUCK TO BOTH TEAMS
Stephen
|
129.422 | Who, What, Where, When????? | SHIPS::DURANT_S | | Wed Jun 02 1993 17:29 | 27 |
|
I know Sky Sports coverage of the game starts at 18.00 but is the game
being shown live on any other channels and when is the kick off ?
Taylor is apparently considering loads of options for tonights game. Is
it:
Dixon or Bardsley ?
Walker or Keown or Pallister ?
Gascoigne or Clough ?
Barnes or Sharpe ?
To replace Ince is it to be Batty or Platt moved back to
midfield ?
Are Sheringham and Platt going to stay as the front two
or are Ferdinand or Wright going to get a game ?
In my opinion tonight is not the time to make sweeping changes. My
team would be:
Woods, Dixon, Dorigo, Walker, Adams, Palmer, Platt, Gascoigne (replaced
later by Clough), Ferdinand, Wright, Barnes.
There is the USA tournament coming up to give Keown, Clough,
Sheringham, and Sharpe their chances.
Steve.
|
129.423 | 2nd half | WOTVAX::MACDONALDI | Stalybridge Celtic | Wed Jun 02 1993 17:38 | 9 |
|
re - 1
"are any other channels showing the England game tonight"
BBC1 are showing the highlights of the first half followed by live
second half action.
mac
|
129.424 | | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | Four days & counting | Wed Jun 02 1993 17:39 | 4 |
| Yeh, when is the kick-off?
Tony
|
129.425 | on the box... | DBOT07::RUSSELL | WEXFORD...ALL-IRELAND S.H. CHAMPIONS, 1993 | Wed Jun 02 1993 17:38 | 4 |
| and I believe the coverage starts on BBC1 at 19:45 and will finish at
21:00.
*Tiger*
|
129.426 | Please sneak a win England... | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Wed Jun 02 1993 17:42 | 17 |
|
I cant believe Taylor is seriously considering dropping Paul Gascoigne,
Gazza didnt play very well on Saturday (he wasnt helped by getting
fouled every time he got the ball), but he is still more than capable
of turning the game our way. If Taylor wants to change things he should
drop Barnes, and give Lee Sharpe a game.
I'll be suprised if there are to many changes, just Batty for Ince which
is enforced, and Ferdinand for Sheringham, if he's fit, with Wright on
the bench again, as he is still struggling with the ankle apparently.
I would be suprised to see another draw.
Dave...
|
129.427 | Too much Dog and Mars bars. | PLUNDR::MORAN | Tripple ripple truffle shuffler | Wed Jun 02 1993 18:22 | 7 |
|
>I cant believe Taylor is seriously considering dropping Paul Gascoigne
It's been reported that Gascoigne has a drinking and eating problem
(not unlike myself, no doubt) and this is affecting his general fitness
levels (still not unlike myself). This is the reason for the talk of
Gazza being dropped.
|
129.428 | He's got to get his appetite back!! | SUBURB::SWAINM | | Wed Jun 02 1993 18:35 | 8 |
| I think it's a ploy to get him psyched up for the match. He seems to
have lost his lust for getting the ball. When he was wound up he used
to produce much better football and get more yellow cards of course.
He still has an eating drinking problem though!!
Matt.
|
129.429 | The winning team ? | OSL09::BJARNE | Bjarne Mehl @NWO | Wed Jun 02 1993 18:56 | 21 |
129.430 | 7pm KICK OFF | MACNAS::SMORAN | | Wed Jun 02 1993 19:23 | 1 |
|
|
129.431 | Where did all the others go? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | June 7-13 Real Football in the U.S | Wed Jun 02 1993 21:24 | 10 |
| Bjarne, (.428)
thanks I was reading an old copy of When Saturday Comes over the
weekend and it listed 9 Norwegian players who had been transferred
to English league clubs so I was surprised to see so few of them
in the team...
regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
129.432 | | BUSSTP::DREES | | Thu Jun 03 1993 00:51 | 10 |
|
Final result from Oslo....
Norway 2 England 0
Looking forward to the comments from Messers Cossey & Barefield !!
:=)
Del.
|
129.433 | Not much point in them coming next week now (:==:) | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | June 7-13 Real Football in the U.S | Thu Jun 03 1993 01:25 | 6 |
| Is this true? - my it's going to be boring next Summer without England
and Scotland!
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
129.434 | Result Anyone? No wind ups please | NEWOA::GUTHRIE_J | Panic Sleeper | Thu Jun 03 1993 01:36 | 4 |
| Anyone be kind enough to enter the full time result.
Jason...on night shift with no radio/tv.
|
129.435 | Norway going to U.S. | ZPOVC::KUMAR | | Thu Jun 03 1993 05:33 | 17 |
| Yep, it's true.
No wind ups
Final Result:
Norway 2 : England 0 (Straight off BBC World Service Sports
Round up at 22:45 hrs GMT)
So, it looks like no Scotland,England or N. Ireland in U.S. And it
leaves Wales with the arduous task of ensuring that the U.K. is
represented. I think they'll make it.
Will Taylor be sacked, NOW ?
Regards,
Kumar
|
129.436 | How about Norway v Portugal in the WC final? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | June 7-13 Real Football in the U.S | Thu Jun 03 1993 07:44 | 27 |
| Kumar,
thanks for the 'official' confirmation. I don't honestly think England are
out of it yet take a look at the remaining fixtures Poland have to play
Norway twice and there's still a lot of games between the top 4 sides
left.
I rang my mum and she knew this score but you beat me to it - she
didn't know the more important score of RCS v Rumania (I thought Mum's
were supposed to know everything?)
On an interesting side note my June edition of WSC (When Saturday
Comes) was in my mailbox when I got home and it contains an article
about the Norwegian commentator called Bjorge Lillelien who gained fame
after Norway beat England in Oslo in September 1981 with his speech
of "Mrs Thatcher, Winston Churchill, Charlie Chaplin, Derek Batey,
Amanda de Cadenet, your boys took one hell of a beating...."
Don't suppose he was commentating tonight if so what did he say?
Forget Graham Taylor, it's John major and the tory government who
should resign (:==:)
Regards,
Andrew.D.wicks
|
129.437 | english sport is dead,dead,dead. | SNOC02::CRAVENPAUL | | Thu Jun 03 1993 08:38 | 4 |
| Yes Andrew, Resign Taylor, Resign Major and above all Resign Graham
Gooch!!. Can anyone tell me was it a case of poor English play or have
Norway improved that much since Gazza gave them that encouragement last
year. Ica.
|
129.438 | Sunderland,Sunderland,Sunderland. | SNOC02::CRAVENPAUL | | Thu Jun 03 1993 08:41 | 3 |
| Oh, and I know this is the wrong conference but can any of you poms
around Manchester give me the latest weather forecast for the test
starting today. Thanks,Ica.
|
129.439 | Wooooops... | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Thu Jun 03 1993 11:45 | 8 |
| oh ohhh....
I'm not going to put on any money on England going to the US next
year....did we deserve to lose?
At least Taylor might be given the push now, with a bit of luck!
-Dom
|
129.440 | I just don't want to talk about it!! | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Thu Jun 03 1993 11:56 | 16 |
|
Well the most pathetic display I've seen from England for Years, Norway
though not a good side tore England apart. I just can't belive how
awful England were, they can still qualify so at least they are not
out of it yet, they need to win all there remaining games and hope Holland
and Poland drop points along the way. Graham Taylor has to take the
blame, his team selection was a little strange to say the least the
team just didn't look as if they knew what they were supposed to be
doing. Des Walker, what has happened!, the man who England have
depended on over the years has lost all confidence his moaning and
wingeing cost England the first goal.
Disapointed, gutted and pissed off....
Neil...
|
129.441 | Deja Vu...... | GYMAC::DCASSIDY | | Thu Jun 03 1993 12:32 | 10 |
|
Please read my note 129.289 on their match against TURKEY and tell me
if I'm very surprised. A few chances went their way but this time
nothing. Lets face it...Norway have quite enjoyably surprised us. It
was like watching the Danes last summer..devil may care
attitude...which at least made the match somewhat enjoyable to watch.
Regards,
Dezzz.
|
129.442 | SHIT..! | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Jun 03 1993 12:39 | 11 |
|
This has to be the worst England performance I have seen for years,
they were completley clueless. How can a team that outplayed Norway at
Wembley last year be so bad last night ???, the manager's got to take
the blame imo, where was Lee Dixon playing, right side of midfield ?, he
cant pass the ball to another England player, Lee Sharpe at left back
???????.
Three wins needed now, I cant see it. We are almost certainly out imo.
Dave...
|
129.443 | Taylor has to GO ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Thu Jun 03 1993 13:15 | 35 |
129.444 | USA - here we come (70% chance) !! | OSL09::BJARNE | Bjarne Mehl @NWO | Thu Jun 03 1993 13:23 | 59 |
129.445 | | AYOV16::KMCCLELLAND | The Honest Truth | Thu Jun 03 1993 13:30 | 8 |
| re last
Sorry Bjarne but you did not beat the "Brits", you beat the English
and there is a world of difference in that.
Just ask the Oslo police.
Kev......
|
129.446 | back to the drawing room | ESSB::BREE | | Thu Jun 03 1993 13:39 | 24 |
| If England had Jack Charlton as manager they would have won a WC or EC
by now.
Charlton does not give care about the press or the public. Under
Charlton Des Walker wouldn't be mouthing at the ref. over a free, Gazza
would not be splashed across the papers crying his eyes out after
losing a semi final, he would have got a kick up the arse and told to
get on with it, he would't be allowed play with a silly plastic mask to
protect his face.
All in all the English team would cease to become a media item and get
back to basics.
but .....
......he's not in charge....
...and you're not likely to be in the U.S.....
Paul
|
129.447 | Do you sing "Rule Britannia" in Scotland ? | OSL09::BJARNE | Bjarne Mehl @NWO | Thu Jun 03 1993 13:44 | 16 |
| Re .445
Ahhhh... sorry about my "glip", I was thinking about "Asterix in
Britannia", well - we beat almost the whole world yesterday, didn't
we ?
And the Oslo police did a good job yesterday, keeping the English
supporters in the Stadium an hours or so after the end of the match.
The problem was that some of them missed their train for Copenhagen...
On tuesday the police may have been a little provocative, I don't know,
but a local paper has this opinion.
Sorry again for my geographic mistake (why did they sing "Rule
Britannia" - a while ?).
Bjarne
|
129.448 | | SUBURB::COMMIT | Commit Group | Thu Jun 03 1993 13:42 | 25 |
129.449 | At least England don't need to qualify for the '96 Euro Championships!!! | FORTY2::ROBERTSON | Living with Flamingos on the DELTA | Thu Jun 03 1993 13:51 | 67 |
| > I'm sure the American Police force were delighted with that result as
> well, It almost completly rules out any soccer violence at U.S.A '94.
Rubbish.. The Germans and probably the Dutch will be there!!! (followed by a
couple of half hearted smiley's)
Last night was total drivel. I've seen more competent performances by my 3
year old daughter in the garden. England do not deserve to go to the US after
that performance.
Woods: He is getting worse by the game. Why was he off balance for the 1st goal,
before the striker touched the ball, and no world class keeper would allow a shot
straight at him go in.
Dixon: No ideas. Got caught out of position for the 2nd goal.
Pallister: Solid
Palmer: Kept thinking he was Norwegian. Kept passing to them!!!
Walker: As Neil said, his confidence is shot to pieces. OK so the free kick
incedent didn't look like a foul, but you never let the attacker get goal side.
Caught in no man's land for the second. Where has his speed gone?? His
international career is surely over as long as he satys in Italy.
Adams: Solid
Platt: He didn't have a good game, but he battled, as ever. Could have scored
in a similar move to the goal he scored v Belgium in '90, but the ball was too
far ahead.
Gascoigne: Was he playing???
Ferdinand: Quiet 1st half, didn't get the supply he requires. Should have scored
from Lee Sharpe's only decent cross, but mis-cued. Had a good break-away,
showed his pace, but Thorsvedt saved well.
Sheringham: Like Ferdinand but came off at half time
Sharpe: Didn't get the ball in the right positions to be a threat. The only time
he did Ferdinand missed cued.
Wright: Didn't get enough of the ball
Clough: Should have stayed on the bench!!!
Norway: Confident, and made England look like they'd struggle in the Reading
Sunday league. They're not world beaters by any means, but they play as a unit
and are very difficult to break down. Unless they self-destruct, they could do
very well next year.
Taylor should go now. I'm sure it's him that's the problem. The players need a
manager they respect and want to win for, and I can't see anyone respecting
Taylor. Sure, he was a good league manager, but he's proved that he doesn't have
a clue at international level. Fresh blood in charge is needed if England are
going to win all their remaining games. They have the talent on the field without
a doubt, but they need a manager to get the best out of them.
Glenn Hoddle, England's Player/manager. Sounds good to me :-)
Failing that, give Cloughy a call. Give him a couple of months and see if there
isn't an improvement.
Al
P.S. That Norwegian commentator died a couple of years ago. He would have loved
it last night.
|
129.450 | What a Pleb! | DBOT07::RUSSELL | WEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93 | Thu Jun 03 1993 14:19 | 55 |
| I have never, in memory, seen an England team so outclassed and
outfought. The Norwegians were technically, tactically and physically
superb. They supported each other time and again to carve open England
and could have scored 6 if they really wanted.
I'm sorry for all the English noters here. At times in the past, you
rode your luck ( eg V Poland last saturday), but luck comes to those
teams who deserve it. Unfortunately, chickens will always come home to
roost. The WC wont be the same without England. Like most Irishmen, I
have a love/hate relationship when I see the England team. I love the
style they are capable of, and the fact that are culturally and
geographically close to us in Ireland. I hate the superior attitude
that still emenates from the English media, just because England won a
World Cup in 27 years ago.
You'll be missed in US '94. Maybe Wales can join us there, I dont
know???
Finally, Graham Taylor should be given a boot in the arse by his
players. He came on the box last night, and immediately said "I feel
sick about this, as sick as Joe Public back in teh UK"...this clver
device put Graham at one with Joe Public against the supposed real
brigands, his players. Taylor was trying to push the blame onto his
players in public..."I share the responsibility for what happened"
Taylor , you shouldnt say things like that in public if you want to
have the faith and loyalty of your players. You should say .." I'm the
manager, I picked the team. We played badly. I accept responsibility.
We will jsut have to come back and try again in our last three games".
You should ***NEVER*** berate or belittle your players in public. They
are humiliated enough. Take them to one side in the next few days,
individually, and tell them what you thought of their performance, and
what you want of them in the future. Instill pride in the wearing of
the White and Blue. Take away the fear factor.
Taylor , you are a lousy manager and a bad human being for the way you
treat your players. Myself, even as an ordinary father to younng kids,
know that you ***NEVER*** humiliate your kids in public , no matter how
bad they've been. You ****NEVER***strip them of their dignity in front
of others. You take them to a quiet place, and have your arguement
there, not in front of their friends and other adults. That way, you
point out what they've done wrong, allow them to repent in dignity.
Taylor, those that take away the integrity of my character do immeasureable
damage to me. This is how your players feel this morning.
Taylor, you inherited a great team that had made it to a World Cup
Semi-Final in 1990. Look what you have done.
Taylor, go.
To all the sickened English supportere here today, I wish you hope to
lighten your burden, and I wish you a new manager.
*Tiger*
|
129.451 | Taylor has to go. | IRNBRU::BARLOW | | Thu Jun 03 1993 14:33 | 27 |
| If England win all three of their remaining matches then they will
probably qualify. But who wants to see England scrape in by the skin
of their teeth only to get thrashed in the WC ? Wouldn't it be
better in the long run if they did not qualify, Taylor gets the sack
and then maybe we can for once qualify for a tournament without scaping
in. If we do qualify we'll never get rid of Taylor. After seeing the game
against Holland I thought we were finally getting somewhere, but after
the games against Poland and Norway..??? The whole point of Qualifying
for the WC is to try to win. Can one person honestly tell me they
think England can win with a team like that ?
I agree with .446. If we had Jack Charlton I think things would be a
lot better. Taylor worries too much about who to play and individual
performances, and I think certain players think that they make the
team. Maybe now with their backs against the wall they can play
better. Maybe now they realise that if they want to play in the world cup,
then they had better fight for it. Teams like Norway and Switzerland
are heading the group tables because they play for a team, a unit and
they are really focused.
England play Poland at home and San Marino and Holland away. The way
I see it there's no point in saying if they win this,then if they could
perhaps.......basically if they don't get their act together,their
confidence back and start to win games with a good performance, then let
alone the rest of their WC qualifying mattches, the USA is gonna thrash
us!
Will. ( Really P*ssed off)
|
129.452 | Taylor out...Venables in. | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Jun 03 1993 14:35 | 16 |
|
I think the time has come for the FA to sack Graham Taylor if he wont
do the honorable thing and resign. Any manager that sends a team out to
play like they played last night, obviously isnt fit to manage an
International side. The England team is capable of much, much better
than they showed last night, we know that, but we wont qualify for the
World Cup now, and that is a disaster.
Its the perfect oppertunity to end the Tottenham saga now, before the
game and THFC get dragged through the sh*t next week in the courts, (as
it wont just be THFC that is going to be in the dock), and get Terry
Venables in the England job. Taylor should be sacked, and Terry
Venables should be offered the job.
Dave...still totally p*ssed off with last night farce.
|
129.453 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Tripple ripple truffle shuffler | Thu Jun 03 1993 14:38 | 19 |
|
We're not out yet. Admittedly, we are a very poor side at the moment
and it's going to take a tremendous turn-around to get this team
playing football. However, it's not impossible and I still think we can
qualify. If Norway take 2 points from Holland next week (and this is
possible) and we get a draw there (or a win) and then win our remaining
games against Poland (home) and San Marino (away), I think we'll
qualify -- it's not too tall an order. However, it's obvious that we
need a big change in personel to reverse our fortunes. I think Glenn
Hoddle should be given the manager's job and the likes of Carlton
Palmer, Lee Dixon, Des Walker, David Platt and Gascoigne removed from
the team (if only till they discover their form -- although Palmer and
Dixon should be banned for good).
Still, if England don't make it, then we still will be able to cheer the
Irish on in '94 (at least probably).
Tim
|
129.454 | They WON'T be missed. | BUSSTP::DSMITH | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRAT | Thu Jun 03 1993 14:38 | 21 |
|
Why won't the world cup be the same without England? Why will they
be missed if they don't qualify?
I cannot understand why people seem to think the above. If they
don't qualify (and I still think they will) then they don't deserve
to be there. I'm sure the supporters of Norway and Holland won't be
upset if England don't qualify. I certainly won't miss them in USA.
It means the television coverage in Britain might for once be un-biased
and will concentrate on all the teams taking part.
England have been living off memories of 1966 and more recently the
semi-finals in 1990. The press then made out that England were
potential world champions, they seem to forget that England were very
lucky to reach them semis in Italy, getting fortunate results against
Belgium and the Cameroon. Now that they've had a couple of bad results,
the press and supporters turn against them. As previous notes have
said, your luck ran out this time.
Danny.
|
129.455 | | YUPPY::PANES | Win your weight in fish | Thu Jun 03 1993 14:53 | 37 |
| <<< Note 129.454 by BUSSTP::DSMITH "WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRAT" >>>
-< They WON'T be missed. >-
> England have been living off memories of 1966 and more recently the
> semi-finals in 1990. The press then made out that England were
> potential world champions, they seem to forget that England were very
> lucky to reach them semis in Italy, getting fortunate results against
> Belgium and the Cameroon. Now that they've had a couple of bad results,
> the press and supporters turn against them. As previous notes have
> said, your luck ran out this time.
> Danny.
Danny,
Please don't blame the genuine football supporter ( who happens to be English )
for the crass arrogance of the tabloids.
As to the game .... well England were piss-poor. I had to laugh at Trevor "
whipping in crosses" Brooking, when he said that Norway were an average team.
If that is the case that what are England? Norway looked very dangerous going
forward, but their defence remained untested ( but that could be that they
didn't allow England to attack them or because England were so inept).
Oh well its only a game, and I am not totally surprised given my luck this
season. The Palace were relegated, Moan United won the P.L, the Arzzz won
both cups and the bloody Tories are still in power.
Stuart
|
129.456 | Hoddlee my arse ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Thu Jun 03 1993 15:04 | 16 |
|
This adoration of Glenn Hoddle is going a bit far.
O.K the guy got Swindon promoted, but they are a team of kickers.
This form of drooling over Hoddle seems a common disease amongst
English supporters. He was *never* a brilliant player and is not
experienced enough to be a good international manager. Media hype once
again decieves the English public.
Give the job to Ron Atkinson or El Tel (Both untainted by the F.A
school of excelence) and solve the problems of nation.
By the way, you should sack every English commentator (appart from El
Tel) along with Taylor. They are as pathetic as he is.
An Impartial Celt.
|
129.457 | Its only a game. Isn't it? | IOSG::PARKER | Jim Parker | Thu Jun 03 1993 15:05 | 30 |
|
As someone who has a lot more experience of World Cup footbal than
the average man can I just say it was better it happened now rather
than England qualifying and getting to the States.
In the States you would only come up against the likes of Costa
Rica, Iran or Peru and get seriously stuffed - take it from me I know.
I have suffered even more than you silent English noters.
As to the previous notes I take exception to those who say Norway
aren't a good team. Are you simply repeating Trevor Brooking's
comments, he thought Poland were a good team! Norway played an updated
version of British football and played it well (maybe because the
England squad didn't have a clue).
To the noter who objected to Bjarne saying "British", well they
would have stuffed Scotland with that performance - wouldn't they.
Managers? This time you might be lucky, the obvious replacement has
just led his team to relegation so the FA won't have the bottle to
choose Coppell. Will they?
Traditionally the FA choose their managers by how well they wear a
blazer and tie and they deliberately exclude anyone with any sign of
genius, style or awkward opinions. I reckon they should go for a
foreigner with a good solid down to earth approach to the game. I don't
think Liverpool will stand in his way! Please before the SFA offer him
a job.
|
129.458 | not sorry that i missed it | SWBNEU::TOURNE::WRIGHT | | Thu Jun 03 1993 15:15 | 10 |
| sounds like another night of national humiliation by proxy - i'm glad i couldn't
find coverage of it on tv now ..
one interesting point is that (at least here in Switzerland) it isn't being
reported as a "shock" result - perhaps other people have a more realistic idea
of our current standing as a footballing nation than we (the english) do. Perhaps
its because their perspective isn't distorted by the (almost unavoidable) bias
you bring to supporting your own club or country
ray
|
129.459 | You mus die.. | FORTY2::FOWLERM | | Thu Jun 03 1993 15:21 | 26 |
| re: -2
Glen Hoddle never a brilliant player?
Aaargghhh!
heresy, sacrilege, treason.
What planet are you living on?
Send me your address and I'll post you the Tribute to Glen Hoddle video.
What's more, Swindon are not a team of kickers, and never have been. Not only
do they play attractive passing football (witness Monday's first division
playoff epic) but, and no disrespect intended, they are crap: it's only Lord
Glenn's rampant genius that has got them into the Premier League.
Oh, I can hardly type, I'm so angry.
Would that we still had the death penalty, oh ye of little footballing brain.
I'm going to calm down.
Mike
PS: Glenn Hoddle for England Manager=World Cup 98 Winners
|
129.460 | Steve rants... | ECCGY4::HAIGH | Experientia does it | Thu Jun 03 1993 15:21 | 22 |
| England were NOT fortunate against Belgium in 1990, they were against
the Cameroons and they were unfortunate against Germany.
Anyway back to real issue, last night;
If you think Norway are an average team you are either wrong or you don't
understand football (probably the latter, seeing as many people thought
England would win both the last two games.) WAKE UP! Norway are a good
team, England last night were SH*TE. They were lucky to only get beat
by 2, 4 or 5 would not have been unfair.
The players were being asked to play in positions they don't normally
play in. Gascoigne played superbly for Lazio a few weeks ago, he only
plays crap for England because he doesn't have the same quality of
players/manager etc, around him that he has in Italy.
Taylor was honest after the game last night, however he should take the
blame more than his players, and honesty does not win matches. Get rid
off him, quickly. Get someone with flair in (NOT Jack Chralton), either
Francis will do, or Ardilles??? Can you imagine the Fashist gutter
press reaction if we picked a none English manager? Especially a
'shock-horror' Argentinian.
|
129.461 | | TRUCKS::SANT | This is as good as it gets! | Thu Jun 03 1993 15:23 | 7 |
|
Good note, Steve. Quite right.
Let's face it, we've been due one of those performances for
a while now.
Andy.
|
129.462 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Tripple ripple truffle shuffler | Thu Jun 03 1993 15:30 | 11 |
|
>What's more, Swindon are not a team of kickers, and never have been.
Oh yes they are (at least on occasions). I'm sure Portsmouth and other
Newcastle fans will testify to this. However, they can play football and
there's nothing wrong with a bit of bite to a team -- something England
lacked in abundance last night. Hoddle would not be worse than Taylor
(whose clubs sides were all unatractive and in the main, ineffective
too).
Tim
|
129.463 | | TRUCKS::SANT | This is as good as it gets! | Thu Jun 03 1993 15:44 | 23 |
|
England were awful last night, but so what. We were lucky to
only lose 2-0 - it could have been *much* worse...
All you non-English noters, please don't assume we're all as
bad as the English media. I would like to think that some of
us are more realistic.
It's not all up for England's campaign to qualify but it may
as well be. If we *do* qualify then things will never change
as they surely need to. It won't do us any harm to fail every
now and again - it's called winning and losing, we all have
to learn to accept both.
No wonder the Irish and Scots love to see us English munching
on humble pie! As a nation, we make such bad losers.
There are lots of excuses that could be offered for England's
performance last night, but who's to say it would have been
any different? Norway deserve this result and it would be
wrong to assume they got it because of England's failings.
Andy.
|
129.464 | Well done Norway | GALVIA::SPAIN | Taylor must STAY | Thu Jun 03 1993 16:12 | 24 |
|
I'd be lying if I said I wasn't happy with last night. It wasn't a
lucky win either nor was it a fluke. Indeed had Norway not indulged
themselves Jim Baxter style it could have been 4.
Norway should qualify now. A result in Holland next Wednesday would
virtually guarantee that they do.
England will battle it out for second place with Holland and Poland.
Taylor will be praying that Holland don't beat Norway to go second. If
so England may need to win in Holland. If Holland draw at hoem to
Norway and England they'll have to win in Poland to catch England on
goal difference. There are a lot of permutations and combinations.
England are not out yet but they'll need to turn in performances like
last April instead of last night.
Norway have been very impressive in this group already - beating
Holland,drawing at Wembley. They deserve to qualify. Holland have not
impressed but they'll be a better side if they reach the finals and
have Cruijff as manager.
Poland could still make it too.
Gary.
|
129.465 | Keegan for manager | WELCLU::BROWNI | The Man who sold the World | Thu Jun 03 1993 16:50 | 9 |
| One man for manager that no-one seems to have mentioned yet.
Kevin Keegan. He did a tremendous job with Newcastle last season, he
was a great player/captain for England.
Either him, or Big Ron. At least he LOOKS the part (overcoat, flashy
watches, gold bracelets, etc.)
Ian
|
129.466 | | AYOV16::KMCCLELLAND | The Honest Truth | Thu Jun 03 1993 17:02 | 20 |
|
re. 457
Jim,
I was the noter who objected to Bjarne saying "British" and I did it
on a point of principle. I am sick to the back teeth of this type of
selective amnesia when the English media are involved. When fans go
on the rampage they are "British". When England win, they are English.
Bjarne made a genuine mistake and I genuinely pointed it out to him so
that he would realise there is a difference between the two. Was I
wrong ? Did Norway really beat Britain last night ?
As for Norway beating Scotland on that performance last night.
SO WHAT ? Does this really mean anything ?? Don't stir up an argument
that isn't there.
Kev...
|
129.467 | | UNTADH::WILCOCKSON | Back in Schlagrahmland | Thu Jun 03 1993 17:10 | 16 |
| >> As previous notes have said, your luck ran out this time.
Yup, I have to agree. I'm an England fan, but I hate all this pre-match
shite we have to read in here (and in the UK press) from people who seem
to be watching a different England team to the rest of the world.
England have had A LOT of luck, every time I see them I am suprised if/when
they win. The only time in living memory I've seen them and been proud
of the performance was the semi-final in 1990. I'm not suprised that their
luck ran out in Norway (no disrespect to the Norway team intended).
Big Jack once applied for the job as England manager, but he never got
a reply - so he decided never to manage them. I'd laugh my socks off if
they offered him the job now and he turned it down (which I reckon he
would).
Al.
|
129.468 | WHAT ??? | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Jun 03 1993 17:17 | 9 |
|
Can someone remind me of all this luck England have had recently, apart
from the Poland match, which I would admit they were alittle lucky to
get a result. Was it when they were lucky to get a draw against Holland
or Norway, or lucky to beat Turkey and San Marino, or lucky to be shit
in the European Championships....oh I know it was when we went to
Poland last year and got another draw. Oh yeah...we are really lucky.
Dave...
|
129.469 | You might be right | IOSG::PARKER | Jim Parker | Thu Jun 03 1993 17:20 | 18 |
|
I could see the FA choosing Keegan, he fits all the idiot criteria,
but it would be a mistake. Despite his performance getting Newcastle
promoted I still remember his telly appearances and the inane comments.
Didn't Clough refuse to appear on telly with him?
There must be an English speaking manager with the necessary
experience around - what about Andy Rox.... Forget it, wishful thinking
on my part.
On Norway though wasn't their "long ball" game terrific. I read
that the Norwegian manager compares their game to Wimbledons! Funny
man, it was classic long passes to players who could control the ball
and who would take on defenders. Really nice to watch.
Norway might do you a favour and beat both Poland and Holland!
|
129.470 | | BUSSTP::DSMITH | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRAT | Thu Jun 03 1993 17:27 | 9 |
|
re .468
Your right Dave, England aren't/weren't lucky/unlucky. Their
just utter crap.
Danny.
|
129.471 | Lady Luck's gawn.. | DBOT07::RUSSELL | WEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93 | Thu Jun 03 1993 17:30 | 21 |
| Like I said, luck goes the way of the brave. If you're a bad team playing
badly, then luck deserts you. If you're a good team playing well, you
get the breaks. England used to get the breaks...they fought well
enough in Poland to get the draw. They kept their heads, despite
glaring misses by the POles that would have made the score 3-0. I
remember well enough the luck they used to have. I can still remember
the stunned silence that greeted the score Poland 1-1 England when it
flashed across our TV screens in 1991. We were 6 minutes from
qualifying for Sweden when Lineker scored the equaliser. You dont have
Lineker anymore (why???) and Wright wouldnt even be fit to clean his
boots.
I feel very sorry for all the genuine English Supporters. I would love
to see England in the USA. I would feel much more empathy watching
England play than watching, say, South Korea. I enjoy the (mostly)
friendly banter in these notes, and will miss it next Summer.
Taylor has gotta go. He's a PR specialist and will, rest assured, do
all in his power to cover his as*.
*Tiger*
|
129.472 | Win The U.S. Cup (In Style) Or Go !!!!! | PANIC::ANDERSON | The original Magpies | Thu Jun 03 1993 17:33 | 41 |
|
Oh, how depressing !!!!!
What amazes me most about Taylor, is that for months he's been moaning
on about not being able to play a settled team because of injuries.
Last night, only the absence of Ince was forced upon him. So what does
he do; give the guys a chance to improve on Saturday's performance ?
No, he completely changes the shape, style (??), and tactics.
Why oh why play with three centre-backs, forcing a natural winger to
spend most of his time defending, play another sometime-centre-back in
midfield, and put a dreadful passer of the ball in as an attacking
right-back.
He picked his team to counter what he saw as Norway's strengths, not
one that capitalised on our own. He knew that a win would have been the
best result, but IMO was scared of going out for it.
The last manager I saw who changed his team week-in week-out to stifle
the opposition led them from out of the old 1st Division and to the
foot of the old 2nd [new 1st] Division. Where is Neil Warnock now ?
Nowhere - probably running his chiropody business again. I suggest
Mr. G. Taylor looks him up, 'cause if he carries on this way he too will
soon be an ex-football manager.
England do have class players, and players with conviction and
commitment (As do all of the 'home' countries to a greater or lesser
extent). What they are lacking at the moment is some-one to blend them
and allow them to play to their strengths. Taylor is not the man.
Brian O.B.E. Clough, your country needs you. No doubt the Ivory Towers
at Lancaster Gate will ignore all the pleas again, but surely, even
some of the old buffers there couldn't fail to have felt shame and
humiliation at last night's performance.
Rob
P.S. Congratulations to Norway - a well deserved victory for an
attractive, well organised football team.
|
129.473 | Get Taylor out. | IRNBRU::BARLOW | | Thu Jun 03 1993 17:34 | 16 |
| Well at least there's one thing that all the noters seem to agree on
and that is Taylor is f*cking S*ITE. But what we have here is a no win
situation. If England Qualify, Taylor will probably stay, and if they
don't qualify he'll get the sack. So what's it gonna be ? A trip to
the states or a new manager. I'd rather have a new manager. If the FA
got their head out of their *ss maybe we could have both. The next
match is in Sept, so what they should do is let Taylor play the 3 Matches
in the U.S and if he f*cks up like I know he will, then they have
plenty of time to put in a new manager before sept. I knew Taylor was
a d*ckhead when he wouldn't play Waddle.
By the way, what do the majority of fans think about Hately ? should
he be considered ? He was pretty devastating in the Euro-championships.
What about him and Waddle in a side, Waddle puts the cross in for
Hately's head ?
Will.
|
129.474 | GET STUCK IN | SUBURB::ONEILLS | | Thu Jun 03 1993 17:41 | 67 |
| I watched the game in my local last night with the same bunch of lads
who have watched SKY alll season. I must say that you get a different
perspective from the "real" football supporters in England to that
portrayed on the press and TV. Two of the stalwarts (Arsenal fans!)
walked out at half time having seen enough. At the end of the game
there was unanimous agreement that England were stuffed.
An early noter put his finger on it. AT international level you have
to fight for every ball for 90 minutes. More and more of the smaller
nations have made great progress in terms of organisation, skill and
tactics. Add this to passion and pride in your country and it's a
powerful combination. If you accept that any national squad,
especially of a powerful nation like ENgland, has good players, the job
of the manager is to motivate them to compete.
Now I am grudgingly a fan of Jack Charlton but for me the essential
difference between him and previous Irish managers (and the current
English manager) is his two consistent battle cries over his long reign
- "GO OUT AND COMPETE" and PUT THEM UNDER PRESSURE". He has motivated
a good squad to go where no Irish team has gone before.
Watching last night's game brought back memories of Ireland's games
when we were on the brink of making the breakthrough. Looking at the
Norwegian crowed reminded me of the heady days in Lansdowne when a
frenzied crowd willed the team to vistory over Spain, the group
leaders.
Jack Charlton has moulded the traditional values of English league
footballers into a cohesive unit. It may not be pretty, but it works.
There is no way an Irish (or English) team under Jack Charlton
would have conceded the battle to Norway last night.
For some reason the English media seem to have a high notion of playing
a fancy passing game. This is not what English league players are good
at. Arsenal won two cups this years...Q.E.D. by competing and physical
power.
Don't anyone tell me that Kevin Moran at 37 (or is it 38) is a better player
than Des Walker. However he wouldn't get caught like Walker did last
night. Norway had at least three English league players who wouldn't
get within an asses roar of the English squad.
For England the answer is to get back to basics. Get stuck in. Get a
manager to motivate the good club players that we "Celts" cheer every
other week of the season. Forget the fancy stuff and the Italian
primadonnas. Looks like England need defenders in the Steve Bruce
mould...not elegant but effective, not fancy but forceful, not meek but
a leader on the field.
Now to the Baltics next week...fingers crossed that at least one
"English League" based team will give Jimmy Hill, The Saint and co.
something to talk about.
I genuinely felt sorry for the "real" English fans in my local last
night.
Shane
|
129.475 | I Love it!!!!! | PEKING::MCKIEN | NICK | Thu Jun 03 1993 17:56 | 18 |
|
All this stuff is BRILLIANT to read.
All because ENGLAND lose ONE game!!!!
Maybe they should get used to losing more often, then it wouldn't be so
painful.
Imo Taylor should go, but if he did would it change anything?
All England managers since Ramsey have been to scared to express
themselves by picking THEIR TEAM. BECAUSE THEY ARE SCARED OF LOSING A
GAME (ANY GAME).
Anyway it's not over until the final whistle.
Nick.
|
129.476 | | UNTADH::WILCOCKSON | Back in Schlagrahmland | Thu Jun 03 1993 18:07 | 11 |
| >> All this stuff is BRILLIANT to read.
>> All because ENGLAND lose ONE game!!!!
Which is probably why the managers are so scared. If it's like this
in here, imagine what the gutter press are writing at this very minute.
The answer is simple - burn down fleet street, sack Taylor (now!!!), give
Big Ron the job, Oh! and shoot the 'fans' in the jail in Oslo.
Al.
|
129.477 | How much better were we ? This much ? | OSL09::BJARNE | Bjarne Mehl @NWO | Thu Jun 03 1993 18:22 | 36 |
129.478 | luck | GALVIA::SPAIN | Taylor must STAY | Thu Jun 03 1993 18:29 | 32 |
|
Re England and luck
IMO
1990 WC a little bit lucky to qualify, Poland hit the bar in the last
minute and deserved more than a 0-0 draw. Deserved to qualify over the
whole group though.
1990 WC lucky to get to the semis, Belgium and Cameroon both deserved
to win
1990 WC unlucky to lose to Germany. Given that they were in the semis
probably deserved to win the tournament.
1992 EC lucky to draw v Ireland at Wembley, lucky to draw in Poland.
1992 EC Finals got what they deserved
1994 WC unlucky to draw at home to Holland and to a lesser extent
Norway. Got what they deserved v Turkey and San Marino. Lucky to
draw in Poland.
Having said all of the above there is more to it than luck. England
showed character, grit and determination in some of the above games.
This was sadly lacking last night. Gary Lineker's class saved England
in the past. Had he been playing last night he may have taken one of
the half chances and England could have stolen a point.
Gary.
Gary.
|
129.479 | South Korea to qualify!!!!!! | KBOMFG::TANNER | Californian Girls are more fun!!!!! | Thu Jun 03 1993 18:35 | 19 |
| re .471....
Tiger, South Korea will hardly be replacing England in the US. It will be
either Holland or Poland by the looks of things, who knows maybe both Holland
and Poland will qualify. I for one will be a lot happier to see Holland there
than England for a number of reasons.
The only decent football that England have played in the past few years was
in Italy, and I also cheered for them against Germany, so Iam not the anti
English git that some folks think Iam. What pisses me off is the garbage the
English media think about this "unbeatable" team and we have a few noters in here
who behave the same. I have feelings for the genuine supporters in here and can
only say "it looks bad, but all is not lost".
I honestly hope that Holland qualify, their history in the world cup is a
good one, and I believe we would all miss the skills of Van Basten, Guillit,
Bergkampf, Koeman and a few others....
-dave-
|
129.480 | Time to get BRITISH...! :-) | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Thu Jun 03 1993 18:51 | 16 |
| Half the problem is always going to be that, there is a confusion
between the English team and the English League which has provided
great European Cup winners etc.
These teams were made up of in general all BRITISH players up to
quite recently.
So the sooner we have a British team made up of Scots, English, Welsh,
and Northern Ireland players the better. The World can give us
the World Cup to keep as there wont be any point of a competition!
:-) Dom.....
What a team the late 60's would have had with Best,Law,Charlton,Greaves
etc etc.....
|
129.481 | Get rid of the F.A ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Thu Jun 03 1993 19:17 | 27 |
|
re: -1
Yeah ! and the English would just end up draging everyone down to their
own level.
I've said it before and I will say it again. It's your so called school
of excelence at Lilishawl (spelt that wrong) that has wrecked the
English game. Your manager was *educated* there and most of your young
footballing talent is there at this very moment having it personality surgically
removed.
Gazza,Hoddle,Waddle are over rated clowns hyped up by the English
media. None of these players have made a mark on world football in the
way Best,Pele,Van Basten etc... have, yet the English press would have
us beleive otherwise.
They were put on pedestals at a time when the English league were lost
for a half decent world class player. Now for the first time in years a
player worthy of world class status is there on the podium and Giggs is
Welsh.
To stop the rot you must get rid of the whole F.A mentality towards
English football not just Taylor.
Face it. The only chance for England is to find Celtic
Irish/Scotish/Welsh players with English grannies and play them !
An impartial Celt
|
129.482 | I can see the hook thro' the bait. | IRNBRU::BARLOW | | Thu Jun 03 1993 19:33 | 1 |
|
|
129.483 | | UNTADH::WILCOCKSON | Back in Schlagrahmland | Thu Jun 03 1993 19:49 | 4 |
| >> Face it. The only chance for England is to find Celtic
>> Irish/Scotish/Welsh players with English grannies and play them !
:^)
|
129.484 | It's not a bad point | BUSSTP::DSMITH | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRAT | Thu Jun 03 1993 19:50 | 13 |
|
Actually, it's not a bad suggestion. One of the reasons why Scottish
football is so bad at the moment is that the majority of plonkers
coaching young players are all "trained" at the SFA school in Largs
under the guidance of Andy Roxburgh and Craig Brown, the Scotland 1 and
2. This means that they are all coached/trained the same way and after
a couple of years, many good youngsters have all their ability stiffled
and before we know it, they're lost to the game. They have to become
good team players which means being able to run up and down the park
for 90 minutes and fight for the jersey. Utter crap!!
Danny.
|
129.485 | :-) | RTOEU::RDELANEY | | Thu Jun 03 1993 19:52 | 5 |
| >in Italy, and I also cheered for them against Germany, so Iam not the anti
But that's only because you live here isn't it ?
- Robin
|
129.486 | | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ | | Thu Jun 03 1993 20:00 | 12 |
|
From this man's viewpoint in the States (including tickets for all
1st round & quarterfinal games at Boston), I'd be pleased indeed
if England stay home next year. Just about any of the other
EuroSides would be either more interesting to watch or better for
ticket re-selling.
On the other hand, England fans should take heart -- I think
you've got a fine chance to get the upper hand when Your Boys take
on San Marino.
--Mr Topaz
|
129.487 | Who was that masked man ? | FUTURS::ROWELL | Conquistador, in search of gold | Thu Jun 03 1993 20:05 | 16 |
|
Mr Topaz,
Based on last nights performance, I doubt it.
I have heard tha during a televised interview this lunch-time, the FA
have given their backing to Taylor. Something about Taylor not being
responsible for how the players perform on the pitch.
Oh well.
Anyway, as the next game is in September, would a new manager really
have time to prepare for it ?
Wayne
|
129.488 | | SUBURB::WAITEG | I WON'T DO WHAT YOU TELL ME | Thu Jun 03 1993 20:05 | 9 |
| Re 470
So what does that make Scotland then???
Gary
|
129.489 | Norway were good too remember... | MIACT::RANKINE | | Thu Jun 03 1993 20:12 | 30 |
|
Im sure youll find in the inane Barnes v Giggs topic that Giggs is
English but chose to play for Wales, as his mother is Welsh.
We cannot have a British International team as the slots allocated to
the leagues of England, Scotland,NI, and (now) Wales will be reduced.
From an emotional, nationalistic point of view it wouldnt work..if they
played at Wembley ther would be complaints of English bias, if the
'ethnic minorities' (I use this term loosely as NI, Scotland and Wales
comprise a small % of UK population) wern't represented fairly there
would be complaints.
re a new manager...... My ideal replacement for taylor would be a
manager who has proven success at club level, AND a lot of European
experience. At the time Taylor was appointed, Clough would have been
the right man. At this present time who is there ??? Hoddle, Keegan,
Big Ron who have all been mentioned do not fall into this cateagory. I
guess only Ferguson, El Tel and George Graham would fit the bill
..would they want it ?? would England offer the post to a Scot ??
would a Scot accept it ??, does El Tel want to finish his battle with
Sugar ?? too much speculation. Sacking Taylor at this time may have
a negative effect to the remaining matches, so perhaps he should stay.
Who knows, with their pride stung, they might come out at the next game
play really well, dominate the game totally, and score 4 .....and
become the darlings of the scum press again.
One bad game doesnt make a disaster make, and England are not out of it
yet.
Paul
|
129.490 | Wake up ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Thu Jun 03 1993 20:21 | 9 |
|
> One bad game doesnt make a disaster, and England are not out of it
> yet.
Typical. Grasping at straws once again. Just face the facts. YOU'RE
CRAP and you're NOT going to qualify for USA '94. How long does it take
for this simple message to sink in ? Somebody drop the penny quickly !
|
129.491 | | BLKPUD::WATTERSONP | Four forks ache | Thu Jun 03 1993 20:35 | 6 |
|
ummm excuse me.......
Is this the world cup group 2 note or the Anti-English note ?
Paul
|
129.492 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Tripple ripple truffle shuffler | Thu Jun 03 1993 20:37 | 2 |
|
Aren't they the same thing anyway?
|
129.493 | I like the English. Really I do. | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Thu Jun 03 1993 20:48 | 13 |
|
I'm not Anti-English. I just want you to wake up to the fact that your
team is not one of the better teams in the world and nor do they
have a god given right to be.
When you get a team together who can play football with style and
a manager and press corps with modesty I will be only too willing to
commend them.
It's your arrogance in regard to football that pisses me off and it has
done since 1966.
Get a grip,Get a Team, Get people to like you, Get El Tel (A man with
credibility, popularity and who takes nor talks no bullshit)
An Impartial Celt.
|
129.494 | | CODS::ESBECK | Dec Van Esbeck | Thu Jun 03 1993 20:52 | 27 |
| re .489
totally agree with you about success at club level. England need a
proven WINNER as a manager, not someone who's been good at building
teams to move up through the league divisions and stop dead.
When did England last have a manager who won a championship for
Christ's sake? Alf Ramsey......
All this talk of Big Ron is a joke. What has he won? Remember that
unlike most managers, Atkinson has been fortunate enough to be involved
with very big clubs since the seventies whether Man U, Wednesday or
Villa, and what has he won?
What did Taylor win at Club level??? What did Bobby Robson win at club
level? The F.A. Cup?
England had no leadership on the park last night. I don't believe they
would have given as dismal a performance if Bryan Robson was
Captain....now I'm not advocating his return, he's well past his
sell-by date, but a new captain should be appointed for the next game.
At one stage last night either Jimmy Hill or El Tel remarked that Platt
went 25 minutes without being mentioned...some captain.
Declan
|
129.495 | I would love to be wrong..... | MIACT::RANKINE | | Thu Jun 03 1993 20:56 | 14 |
| Dear Mr Hayden,
As I was the topic of your 'lets face it youre crap' response.
Just a small point....I am Scottish, and yes we are crap. I was
talking about the English team, and I while I may wished to have
expressed the same feelings as yourself, I tried to be diplomatic and
offer some constructive, rather than destructive, opinions.
Try it sometime...
I still dont think that England are out of it, but it will be tough for
them.
Paul
|
129.496 | Shouldn't you be rooting for Norway | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | June 7-13 Real Football in the U.S | Thu Jun 03 1993 20:55 | 7 |
| at the risk of interrupting this note could I remind everyone
that should Norway beat Holland next week it may not be as bad as it
looks.
regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
129.497 | Mr. to you ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Thu Jun 03 1993 21:04 | 10 |
|
Dear Mr. Rankine,
I was also refering to the English team and I am sure that this was
obvious to you. My comments are constructive as the sooner the English
public realise how bad their team and comentators are, the better for
the future of world football. After all the English league and national
Team are still important to the future of both our nations football.
An impartial Celt
|
129.498 | Elephant and Castle | FORTY2::ETHERIDGE | cripes | Thu Jun 03 1993 21:10 | 22 |
129.499 | Don Revie | 45736::MACDONALD | | Thu Jun 03 1993 21:35 | 12 |
| Re a few back - the England manager before Robson and
Greenwood was Don Revie who at the time of his
appointment was by far the most successful English
manager - great team, 2 championships, FA cups etc - and
look what he did!
In general, OK England were crap but only 2 games ago
against Holland I thought they played some of the best
football I've seen from an England team, especially in
the 1st half before Gascoigne got assaulted.
Jamie
|
129.500 | | CODS::ESBECK | Dec Van Esbeck | Thu Jun 03 1993 21:42 | 8 |
| You're right, Revie won the league with a superb team (wasn't he
England manager when Leeds won their second title?) but Leeds nickname
at that period was "always the bridesmaid, nevber the bride". They won
nothing near their potential......Leeds weren't the great winners they
should have been. And in the end, Revie walked out on England.....after
how long?
Declan
|
129.501 | The silly Yoddlers won't qualify | STKOFF::SPERSSON | Pas de probleme | Thu Jun 03 1993 21:59 | 26 |
|
Thought I'd balance the England-bashing in here by putting in some
Norway-bashing :-)
Re: .496
> at the risk of interrupting this note could I remind everyone
> that should Norway beat Holland next week it may not be as bad as it
> looks.
>
> regards,
>
> Andrew.D.Wicks
...and may I remind you Andrew that Norway have *never* won an away
game against class opposition in *any* competition whatsoever. OK so
they beat Holland. OK so they've beaten Italy. Everybody wins the odd
home game, even Wales. To qualify you need results home *and* away.
Norway are and remain a 3rd rate team and the fact that they beat
England does not contradict this statement in any way.
Poland and Holland to qualify
cheers,
Stefan
|
129.502 | It's not all over yet | GALVIA::SPAIN | Taylor must STAY | Thu Jun 03 1993 22:08 | 18 |
|
Following on Andrew's point. The following scenario sees England
qualify.
Holland v Norway - draw
England v Poland - home win
San Marino v Holland - away win
Holland v England - draw
San Marino v England - away win
Poland v Holland - draw
England 14 pts
Holland 13 pts
Even if Holland win in Poland they could lose on goal difference as
England will know how many they need in San Marino.
Gary.
|
129.503 | | KIRKTN::ISUTHERLAND | Serial Waster | Thu Jun 03 1993 22:26 | 15 |
|
RE:.494
Bobby Robson also led Ipswich to European success in 1981.
IMO he quit (or was hounded out),the England job too soon,
as he was just getting a decent side together in '90 before
Taylor stepped in and ripped the guts out of it.Which is
probably just as well for us Scots).:>)
P.S.
Since Scotland and N.Ireland are out of next year's WC,and
England and Wales are as good as out,maybe we should reform
the old British Championships.But then again,the F.A. would
never allow this since none of us "British" hooligans are
allowed anywhere near London,are we?
|
129.504 | Did we lose to Portugal or something? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | June 7-13 Real Football in the U.S | Thu Jun 03 1993 22:39 | 9 |
| Re .503,
could you explain how Wales are "as good as out"?
this I have to hear
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
129.505 | Taylor is a Turnip Head | ESSB::BLONG | UNITED Premier League CHAMPIONS 1993 | Thu Jun 03 1993 22:55 | 17 |
129.506 | Hands Off Graham's Our Man | NEWOA::GUTHRIE_J | Panic Sleeper | Fri Jun 04 1993 01:11 | 31 |
| RE -1
What makes you think that Graham would want to be England Manager
because
1...He is Scottish
2...He is Arsenal through and through,the man has Arsenal
memorobilia(sp) in his home and it's been said that this is why his
first wife left him.
3...He's got a European Campaign to look forward to with at least
a successfull side that battles (more than you can say for England).
Oh England can't have Fergie because Man U are so great but Graham's a
likely candidate.
Get real and Get bent
Anyway I digress,have to agree with a few notes back would not be such
a bad idea to keep Taylor as there is no way we will qualify with him
and at least it will save us the embarrassment of a nightmare in the
US.Although I had set my heart on going to America to watch England but
had this in mind before Taylor's self distruct job on the England team,
England did look like they had the makings of a good side before he
took over.
Jason
Jason
|
129.507 | What's a 1st or 2nd range football nation ? | OSL09::BJARNE | Bjarne Mehl @NWO | Fri Jun 04 1993 13:25 | 55 |
| RE: .501
> Thought I'd balance the England-bashing in here by putting in some
> Norway-bashing :-)
You are Swedish, aren't you ?
> ...and may I remind you Andrew that Norway have *never* won an away
> game against class opposition in *any* competition whatsoever. OK so
> they beat Holland. OK so they've beaten Italy. Everybody wins the odd
> home game, even Wales. To qualify you need results home *and* away.
> Norway are and remain a 3rd rate team and the fact that they beat
> England does not contradict this statement in any way.
>
> Poland and Holland to qualify
>
> cheers,
>
> Stefan
So the fact that we have these results:
Norway - Holland 2-1
England - Norway 1-1
Norway - England 2-0
Norway - Turkey 3-1
Norway - San Marino 10-0
San Marino - Norway 0-4
22 scored - 3 behind Thorstvedt
makes us a 3rd rate team ? So what is a 1st or a 2nd rate team ?
We don't want to look back at our football history (even if we won the
bronze medal in the '36 olympics :-). You are right about our history,
but after "Drillo" joined as our manager, we have 5 losses out of 27
matches.
In opposite to England, our football history is written in the 90's,
not in the 60's. Forgive me, I have always been a fan of English football,
but the times they are a'changing.
Here is the statistics four our away matches after "Drillo", so you
have a point, Stefan, but there is only 5 days to go for the Holland game.
Away wins: 5 (Qatar, Tunisia, Bermuda, San Marino, Cypern) :-)
Away draws: 3 (England, Portugal, Italy)
Away losses: 2 (China, Denmark)
I think we *never* have been as strong as we are now. Not that I think we
will beat Holland, but we can struggle for a draw. We have lost the
respect for the _1st_ range nations.
Bjarne, (with good luck to Sweden, see you next year in the states !)
|
129.508 | | XSTACY::MDUNPHY | Just another Day!! | Fri Jun 04 1993 13:43 | 6 |
| re a few back...
Jason,
You can always go over and watch the Irish!! 8^)
Mick (who hopes to be there)
|
129.509 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Finishing's not his strong point | Fri Jun 04 1993 14:51 | 12 |
| re: -2
How did Norway manage to lose to China?
Have they suddenly become a footballing superpower or is this even more
embarrassing for England (i.e. we are not as good as China)?
Apparently Glenn Hoddle is not renewing his contract with Swindon so it's
obvious that bert millichip has had a sly word with him and he'll be taking
over from Graham Taylor soon. 8-) (In my dreams)
Mike
|
129.510 | Come in Graham .. | MACNAS::JMALLON | | Fri Jun 04 1993 15:03 | 23 |
|
Congratulations to Norway on a well deserved win. Some lovely football
- it is a pity that they didn't want to score in the last half an hour.
What ever Graham Taylor/ the English press were thinking about talking
about 3/4 points from the last two games I'll never know. In both matches
England looked second best.
Talyor leaving - hopefullly (not! - for non Englnad supporters). The man
is to international football management what John Major is to
international politics. Dull, Boring, radiates an air of cluelessness (?)
and despair to those around.
The (late) replacements - clough, El Tel and big fat ron. Great managers
who have made good teams with little or nothing to work with. Also great
media manipulators in their own way. To add to this list how about the
one and only "Big Mal" Allison. With any of the above, England could still
get beat by smaller nations who didn't invent the game but at least the
after match interviews would be worth listening to.
;-)
John M.
|
129.511 | We'll we see you in the States, SCOTLAND | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK | Fri Jun 04 1993 15:18 | 18 |
|
I'm still confident we'll qualify, all be it with the help of the
other Countries. The only problem with this is, Taylor will still be in
charge the only way he'll leave is if we fail to qualify. So it looks
as if we are stuck with him until after the World Cup Final.
Lets put it this way, everyone will have forgotton Wednesdays Result when
David Platt leads us to the final next year, I won't be arrogant and
say we'll win it but, you never know in a finals. If the last few
Tournements are anything to go by there has been a steady progression
and pattern to Englands World Cup Campaign.
86 Quarter Final's
90 Semi Final's
94 Final..
98 FINAL**WINNERS** if we don't win it in 94
Neil...
|
129.512 | | BUSSTP::DSMITH | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRAT | Fri Jun 04 1993 15:26 | 13 |
|
Neil, isn't it about time you changed your profile header. The fat
chappie, once again couldn't kick his backside when the pressure was
on. Given the number of caps he's got, how often has he actually played
as well as a "world-class superstar" should? Ok, he's done the business
against a few minnows but that's about it. He occassionally plays well
for his Italian club but any average to good player should be able to
do that when in a team with quality players around him.
I'm afraid the verdict is still the same "Gazza'a a PRAT"
Danny.
|
129.513 | As Requested!! | PEKING::COSSEYN | WORLD BEWARE DSMITH'S A PRAT | Fri Jun 04 1993 15:36 | 5 |
129.514 | Stay Away From The USA ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Fri Jun 04 1993 15:39 | 20 |
129.515 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Finishing's not his strong point | Fri Jun 04 1993 15:42 | 11 |
| Neil,
Your confidence in England reveals me to be a pseudo-fairweather fan. Only
a true supporter can watch us get massacred by a second-rate Scandinavian team
and conclude that next year we'll be in the World Cup Final.
I am lost in admiration. 8-)
Go England: I will never doubt you again.
Mike
|
129.516 | SCRAP THE SYSTEM | YUPPY::BUSH | Alive and Kicking | Fri Jun 04 1993 15:45 | 49 |
|
This is not a note inspired by a dreadful defeat in the vain of "oh
my god what has happened to England" or "Sack the manager"
THis is an opion that I have carried for a few years now.
I hope England do not qualify for the finals. Then, and only then,
will pepole start to realise just how dreadful the English game in
general has become. The whole system needs to be re-thought. Our method
and style of play stems from the way young kids are taught to play the
game - or how they see the game played. There is so much emphasis on
athleticism and hard work that most of our players are excellent
athletes who can run at 90mph for the full 90 minutes. The current
teaching at th School of Excellence (!!) is route one football relying
on a strong tackle in defence and then a quick hoof to a fast forward
ie Arsenal, Adams to Wright. There are plenty of youngsters who have
lots of skill and like to take time on the ball and play neat passing
movements. These players though are nearly always then criticised for
not using their Ben Johnson-like forwards properly or not working hard
enough for the team in chasing back and hasseling the opposition. Young
players especially then lose heart and either try to change the way
they play or they are lost to the game permanently. We need to develop
a school of true Excellence that teaches players such things as skill
and how to create space and time for themselves. WE have players that
can do that, the likes of Giggs, Hoddle, Gascoigne and Waddle. these
players again get criticism for not chasing back and throwing in
crunching tackles.
We do produce some talented and skillfull players but where we lag
behind the rest of Europe and also the emerging African nations is the
level of skill through the whole team. Every player including defenders
should have some skill, they should be comfortable to run with the
ball, to pass it accurately and to be happy to keep the ball at their
feet for more than two seconds.
Until we can re-educate the system England - and the other home
natins cannot expect to be Winners.
As I said at the start of this soap box speech, I have thought this
for some time now. I am a die hard Arsenal fan but I do not go to see
them anymore - nor do I make any special effort to see any League games
of any club. I just do not find the football played in 98% of these
games enjoyable. The only games I make an effort to watch are the
Italian League on Channel 4! Usually much more interesting and
enjoyable to watch.
Tony B.
|
129.517 | Just a disaster. | BUSSTP::DSMITH | WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRAT | Fri Jun 04 1993 15:56 | 21 |
|
re last
That's the most sensible note in this conference for years. As was
said, it applies to football in Britain as a whole, not just 1
country. The whole system, schools of excellence, coaching schools
etc have ruined football in this country so much that we are now far
behind in real footballing terms. We'll probably always be there or
there abouts because of our "great fighting and team spirit" (god I
hate that saying) but as for ever winning anything, forget it.
The problem is trying to change the system. I don't know how it
operates in England, but up here in Scotland, almost all the coaches
with league clubs and many of the youth and junior coaches all go
through an SFA caoching school and are basically trained to think, act
and talk the same way. You then see boys club "managers" standing at
the sidelines in their fancy club trench coats, berating 5 and 6 year
olds for not coming back to defend or mark space.
Danny.
|
129.518 | Is it Shoe size time ? | FUTURS::ROWELL | Conquistador, in search of gold | Fri Jun 04 1993 16:15 | 51 |
| Mr Impartial Celt,
For someone who claims to be impartial, I find your comments incredibly
offensive.
You keep on stating that we English supporters must face facts that
"You are crap" and "You are not going to qualify for U.S.A. 94".
Fair enough. That is your opinion, and you are entitled to it. But you
blindly ignore facts that do not suit you. Except for one or two
English 'Rednecks', we all realise that the last two games England have
played, they played very badly. We know that Taylor is not a good
manager, and that he has not got a good team. We have been acknowledging
these facts for the last 100+ notes. Even the Press (including the
better Newspapers) have been heralding these facts to all who would
read them.
The biggest fact that you ignore totally, is that England CAN still
qualify for the finals in U.S.A. 94. Granted, they probably wont, but
none the less, it is still a possibilty. That, Mr Celt, IS a FACT.
Whether or not the standard of football played is pleasing to you,
or the rest of the world is not a criteria for which qualification
is based. Naturally, WE would like to see England in the Finals.
As this is the note to discuss the group that England play in, and
as we are English, we are allowed (unless someone changed the rules)
to discuss the chances/performances etc of our National team. And long
may we continue to do so.
I find it amazing that that the cornerstone for you hatred of English
Football are the constant reminders of 1966.
1: Why should we not be allowed to mention and reflect upon past success ?
2: Why is it always the non English who always bring it up ? (Scan this
topic, and record all notes mentioning 1966)
Please remember that the English are allowed to be as partisan in the
support of England as the rest of the world is in their own countries.
If we choose to want/demand/expect better of our National teams, that
is our concern. If we want to be over the top, we will. If we expect
a God given right to be successfull, then so what ?. It is only
ourselves that we delude. It is us that end with our pride hurt. Are
you really afraid that you may end up believing it ?
Please go back to the topic of your own group, and stop this mud
slinging that you enjoy so much. There have been many comments,
views and opinions that have been constructive, and that I have enjoyed
reading, and I would like to thank the contributors for them.
An Impartial Anglo-Saxon
|
129.519 | Here Here | FUTURS::ROWELL | Conquistador, in search of gold | Fri Jun 04 1993 16:19 | 5 |
| P.S.
I agree with .516 (and .517) wholeheartedly.
Wayne
|
129.520 | | ARRODS::OHAGANB | notes from hell | Fri Jun 04 1993 16:47 | 7 |
| Here's my annual Big Ron for England supremo entry:
Big Ron For England supremo!
And there you had it.
barry.
|
129.521 | NOT DEAD YET | MACNAS::SMORAN | | Fri Jun 04 1993 16:55 | 28 |
| England are not dead and buried yet, they might be on a life support
machine but if they win their three matches, they could be on the way
to recovery.
I think the difference with the Norway match and the Holland match was
the attitiude of the manager. In Wembly he picks a team to attack and
attack they did. Then he turns around and picks a team to counter act
the Norwegians. Why worry about the opposition, play to your own
strenghts (and ye do have them) and let them worry about you.
As regards coaching, I agree with everythink said. I had the experience
of bringing a youth over for trial with Villa a few years ago. This
youth could dribble with a sixpence. He was an out and out winger. We
stayed for two weeks and he was coached in speed & stamina for 90% of
the time and skills 10%. He finally got a match prior to leaving. In
the first half he got about three kicks of the ball, which he then
layed off. At half time I questioned him around his display and asked
if he was nervous. The reply shocked me. He was told that he had a
square of ground to cover and he was not to leave it. I immediately
told the manager that he would not be playing in the second half and
gave my reasons. He agreed to allow him 20 mins to prove himself. This
he did by scoring 2 and laying on 2. He was also offered to sign. Does
this type off attitude promote good football.
Regards
Stephen
|
129.522 | Sow the seeds now for 2002 ?? | MIACT::RANKINE | | Fri Jun 04 1993 16:59 | 36 |
| well the last couple of notes have been encouraging...
A lot to do with the decline in standards in our little island has to
do with the 'win at all costs' attitude ..win trophies, not friends.
This coupled with the fear of losing and the business pressure of
making profit must play a factor. As someone stated earlier, any
revival has to start at an early age and move upwards. If kids are
being subjected to the win or bust attitude at 5 or 6 years old, then
we dont have any hope for the future.
In the days of the Dutch 'total football' one of the reasons given was
that in Dutch schools football the kids had to play in a different
position from the one that they played in the previous week. Im not
sure whether this was strictly the case, or how it could be 'enforced'
but it sounds like a great idea to me. There was no doubt that the
Dutch team of the 70's were great individual players, but played as a
team as well. It could be argued that they didnt win a great
deal...but that attitude is what Im saying is the problem.
If the schools of excellence could advocate such a programme, Im sure
that the quality of our football would start to improve at the top
level in some 7-10 years time. Unfortunately as we know, very few
people are prepared to invest in long term benefits...but somethings
got to be done...or well end up with a country full of Wimbledons and a
national team(s) where night games require searchlights and not
floodlights !!.
Paul
Popular managers in this (and other notes) are Clough, El TEl, Hoddle,
Keegan etc....all of whom want to have teams who play football. An
underlying reason for the Sugar v El Tel situ is that Terry wants his
team to play good football (and if they win something thats a bonus)
Sugar wants Tottenham to win...and make profit.
|
129.523 | Brialliant Notes ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Fri Jun 04 1993 17:13 | 17 |
|
re:518
GOTCHA !
re: All on coaching
Excelent notes. Couldn't agree more.
Just look back to the times when you and I were kids and played street
football. On the working class streets of Britain & Ireland that was where
true genius was bred. Emulating our idols. Trying to do the little
flicks , the body swerves, etc... The kids of today don't see that kind
of thing on a week in week out basis any more (unless they watch
Channel 4) and thus they have nothing to copy. We are losing agrip on a
great game and the rot started with the F.A school of excelence.
An Impartial Celt.
|
129.524 | | CHEFS::HOUSEB | | Fri Jun 04 1993 17:13 | 6 |
| re .486
Mr Topaz - are you implying that you are a ticket tout ???? I hope not.
Brian
|
129.525 | Ha Ha Ha, I'm rolling around here... | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Fri Jun 04 1993 17:16 | 10 |
|
ESSB::PHAYDEN
RE. GOTCHA...
Well done, that was really good, your a real card.
Yawn.
Dave...
|
129.526 | Brooking Brief(ly) | YUPPY::ASHLEYSMITH | whoops, there goes another year.. | Fri Jun 04 1993 17:22 | 9 |
| Anyone here Trevor Brookings comments when Les Ferdinand missed
England's only real "chance" early in the 2nd half.
"finishing is not his strong point"
England's centre forward can't finish. Frightening isn't it.
Andy
|
129.527 | Oh that's what it is ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Fri Jun 04 1993 17:24 | 6 |
|
re:525
Was that satire ? Oh you are a clever boy !
An Impartial Celt.
|
129.528 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Finishing's not his strong point | Fri Jun 04 1993 17:30 | 7 |
| re .527
Was that sarcasm?
Do you write all your own material?
You're a funny man. Perhaps you should audition for the Russ Abbot show.
|
129.529 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Tripple ripple truffle shuffler | Fri Jun 04 1993 17:33 | 7 |
|
>You're a funny man. Perhaps you should audition for the Russ Abbot show.
There's already a queue forming, headed by Graham Taylor and his
clowns. I'm not a slapstick fan myself though.
Tim
|
129.530 | Nope! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Fri Jun 04 1993 17:35 | 9 |
|
re:528
No. If I wanted to be sarcastic I would have said
"England have a great chance of getting to USA '94"
An Impartial Celt.
|
129.531 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Finishing's not his strong point | Fri Jun 04 1993 17:37 | 5 |
| re: last
Ooooh. Cutting.
8-)
|
129.532 | | BLKPUD::WATTERSONP | Four fox ache | Fri Jun 04 1993 17:37 | 15 |
|
The fact that the Wimbledons, Sheff Utds and Arsenals are
'succesful' in the Premier league means that nothing will change in
English football.
None of the above teams play football - they are spoilers, they deny
other teams space and possession and hope to score the odd goal from
free kicks, corners or hopeful long balls - very little from open
football. It's boring to watch, does nothing to encourage skill - but
it gets results and may win the odd cup or two. Few 'footballing' teams
can play against it, so it just encourages the rest to drop to that
level.
Paul
|
129.533 | Not much fight or spirit | NEWOA::FIDO_T | Ain't it great ! | Fri Jun 04 1993 17:40 | 12 |
| > behind in real footballing terms. We'll probably always be there or
> there abouts because of our "great fighting and team spirit" (god I
> hate that saying) but as for ever winning anything, forget it.
Danny,
whilst agreeing with your sentiments, the biggest disgrace about
the game in Norway was that the England team did not EVEN have "great
fighting and team spirit".
Terry
|
129.534 | | FUTURS::ROWELL | Conquistador, in search of gold | Fri Jun 04 1993 18:17 | 7 |
| I am almost afraid to aask this, but is the squad going to the
States the same as that which returned to a hero's welcome yesterday ?
Could someone post the squad ?
Thanks,
Wayne
|
129.535 | Proof that I am... | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Fri Jun 04 1993 18:18 | 8 |
|
re:532
You should have included Ireland there also.
Does that prove my impartiallity ?
An impartial Celt.
|
129.536 | | SIOG::BUCKLEY | | Fri Jun 04 1993 18:20 | 4 |
| I saw in one of the 'quality' papers that two senior England players were leading
a players revolt against Graham Failure. Anyone heard anything about this?
Patrick.
|
129.537 | | CODS::ESBECK | Dec Van Esbeck | Fri Jun 04 1993 18:20 | 22 |
| re -2
Paul,
Arsenal have scored more goals than anyone in recent years, although
not this season. They were top scorers in 89, 91 and 92. I wouldn\t
call that the odd goal....and in 1991 they received a good press for
their performances.....
The fact is, England could perm any 11 players from 20-25 and still do
just as well. Look at the Republic of Ireland - as many people have
mentioned, they do consistently better with a much smaller squad
selected from the same pool, and they don't have better players, they
probably aren't even as good. Are Quinn, Aldridge and Cascarino better
than Wright, Shearer et al? No, they're not! Are Mick McCarthy and
Kevin Moran better than Pallister, Walker, Adams et al? No they're not.
It's 80% attitude, which is where you have to blame the manager.
Declan
Declan
|
129.538 | | CODS::ESBECK | Dec Van Esbeck | Fri Jun 04 1993 18:24 | 7 |
| ....and I watched the Italian football on last Sunday, which featured
Milan. It was dire stuff.
Why is English soccer far more popular in Norway than the Italian
League games?
Declan
|
129.539 | What a Record | ESSB::BLONG | UNITED Premier League CHAMPIONS 1993 | Fri Jun 04 1993 18:35 | 5 |
129.540 | | BLKPUD::WATTERSONP | Four fox ache | Fri Jun 04 1993 18:40 | 17 |
|
Declan,
I've seen Arsenal a few times over the last couple of years - when they
last won the league, they had a very strong midfield and were capable
of creating goals from any position - last season they abandoned the
midfield and had a strong defence and one exceptional goalscorer up
front.
Ireland's record isn't really that much different to England's over the
last couple of years - agreed the Irish always seem to give 100% -
which England didn't against Norway, but their never going to win
anything - basically because they've got to pick their players from the
same league as England.
Paul
|
129.541 | We've had our fair share of them.. | GYMAC::DCASSIDY | | Fri Jun 04 1993 18:44 | 22 |
|
Paul,
Whilst I agree that the 'spoilers' in the game are not pretty to
watch, can you remember the Argentina team in Italy and the German team
in Mexico '86....slight spoilers and both reached the Final. In fact
the German team of '86 was the biggest example of a team getting far
on identifying just 1 or 2 chinks in the armour of the opposition.
Having just spent a month in the USA and spoken to the locals on the
game (over a beer whilst watching the Bulls v Knicks basketball) they
couldn't be bothered watching the game because of this spoiling
attitude and long periods where effectively nothing happens. He said
however that he liked watching the women play football because they
just went for it (I surreptitiously hinted that that might be because
the USA womens team are pretty good).
I hope that the 3 poists for a win in the '94 Finals will prove a
success and whittle its way down to the qualifying groups.
Cheers,
Dezzz.
|
129.542 | A few reflections | KEEGAN::TURNER | | Fri Jun 04 1993 19:01 | 106 |
|
Well, I've been read-only in this conference for a long while now. I used to
participate in the old FOOTBALL conference but I've been loathe to do so in
this one, largely through lack of time and, quite frankly, because of the
feeling of boredom aroused by so many so-called football fans who are unable to
watch a game from a neutral point-of-view but have to resort to provoking those
who support a different team from them while defending the dubious merits of
their own team. Note 129 is the example to end all examples.
I don't think any fair-minded Englishman has any problem in acknowledging
Norway's superiority the other night. I only saw highlights here in Italy (the
game was shown live on a pay-only channel) but those highlights and the reports
I've heard (plus the ample coverage in this conference) only point to one
thing: England were fortunate to lose 2-0.
What I find extraordinary is the reaction in this note - comments ranging from
"I can't deny I'm delighted that England won't be going to U.S.A." to "You're
crap and the sooner you realise it the better". To summarize, we have (correct
me if I'm wrong):
- One Norwegian noter, duly elated about his team's victory, but gracious
enough to refrain from gloating.
- A couple of England supporters with wool over their eyes who obviously are
living on a different planet.
- Umpteen England supporters who are very sporting in defeat, *scathing* (in
some cases exageratedly so, IMO) about their own team and with various
solutions to the Great National Problem.
- Umpteen predominantly Irish/Scottish supporters, the majority of whom (and
there are exceptions) seem more delighted when England lose than when their
own teams win.
And it's to this last group that I address the rest of my note.
Take time off to extract all the replies in 129 and remove any written by the
Terrible Duo (we all know who they are). If you can find *any* traces of
English arrogance in the remainder, by all means start a new note with a
suitable title. I'm *convinced* that if the boot had been on the other foot
and, say, Ireland were in England's position, we'd have seen at least half the
last 50 notes set hidden. Analysing the reactions after the England-Ireland
matches of recent years, I sincerely cannot understand what is the bee in the
Irish bonnet; maybe one day they'll reveal all. But read on.
The chief grievance seems to be with the tabloids/Jimmy Hill. Well, luckily, I
rarely get to see a British tabloid out here in Italy, but I regularly buy the
Guardian...and pro-English it most certainly ain't. You want examples? David
Lacey refers to the period when English clubs dominated the European Cup for 8
successive years as the Dark Age of European Football.
But this is beside the point. If I don't like Slimline salad dressing, I DON'T
BUY IT. Instead of whimpering about the tabloids, try reading something else.
I'm sure it's a worldwide phenomenon anyway. Out here, there's a sports
newspaper called La Gazzetta dello Sport which is about as moderate as the
Pravda! You'd think that the rest of the world only existed to provide target
practice for Italy's extraordinary football machine ("...never mind if his
name's Van Basten, *we* taught him how to play football..."). Personally, I
wouldn't want my fish-and-chips wrapped in a British tabloid and I'd like to
think that most of the English noters here share the same opinion.
That said, I've been pretty pissed off with Ian St. John, Pat Crerand and
Archie McPherson in recent years (thank God, I don't have to put up with them
any more...although the Italians have some more than worthy substitutes!). I
won't forget Ian St. John's antics after Uruguay knocked Scotland out of the
1986 World Cup, nor the all-round whooping after Archie Gemmill's goal against
Holland in 1978. *Very* objective commentating.
The Irish deserve a special mention. I've always stuck up for them in the
past and admired their grittiness. But God knows, from a footballing point of
view there's precious little else to admire (sorry to differ with a good number
of the Irish contributors to this conference). If ever it was more true that
beauty is in the eye of the beholder! I'd like to think of Keane, Houghton and
Sheridan when I talk about Big Jack's team; unfortunetely, the
images that spring to mind are Donkeys (Donkies?) Staunton, O'Leary and Quinn.
I recall sitting down to watch a video of Ireland-Italy in the U.S. Cup last
year and, yes, at the beginning of the game I had my green-tinted spectacles
on. Suddenly, I found myself fast-forwarding at random through sheer boredom.
Well, I was in bed 40 minutes after the kick-off. Certainly, one of the most
atrocious games of football I've ever had the displeasure to see and I won't
even mention the Italian opinion of Ireland's brand of non-football. In
retrospect, I was only too glad that the U.S. showed Ireland a thing or two
about how to play attractive football. Because for me, FOOTBALL must always be
the winner.
You can criticise England as much as you like, and much of the constructive
criticism is well-appreciated (at least by me). But I have a sneaky feeling
that those who object to the England's perseverance with ball-players such as
Gascoigne, Barnes, Waddle, Hoddle and co. are the same people who have
criticised Talbot, Reid, Ball, Batty and any other "workhorse" from the last 30
years who you'd care to mention. Too easy.
I could carry on ad infinitum. Suffice to say, congratulations Norway (I'd be
considerably more "hearty" if I'd actually seen the game!) and a constructive
point to ponder on, which (strangely) no one has mentioned yet. Can England's
problem not be put down to a total inability to perform away from home?
Otherwise, how can we explain the difference in home/away performances in
recent years against Norway (who had ONE shot on target at Wembley), Turkey,
France, Holland, Poland, Cameroun, etc.?
Dom (who realises that the line of discussion has changed a little during the
last rush of notes, but couldn't post this till now!)
P.S. Don't worry, Messrs. TANNER and Impartial Celt (closet Irishman?) - we
know you're not anti-English really. I'm sure you only put your racist hats on
when you write in this conference...
|
129.543 | Well written, well balanced note, now there's a novelty | YUPPY::PANES | Win your weight in fish | Fri Jun 04 1993 19:24 | 0 |
129.544 | Good one ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Fri Jun 04 1993 19:28 | 13 |
|
re: 542
An excelent note. You should contribute more often.
I'd love to write a reply but I gotta go.
An Impartial Celt. (Nothing closet about, I'm IRISH and not
particularly proud of our style of football)
P.S But at least we're going to the U.S
|
129.545 | aaaaahhh quit yer bitchin..!! | DBOT07::RUSSELL | WEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93 | Fri Jun 04 1993 19:54 | 14 |
| I'm Irish and I object to some of the cr*p thats being written
against the English. It's almost like some of us are so insecure in our
sense of worth as a sovereign and independent people that we must
deride the English to derive any self-belief in *OUR*selves and *our*
abilities.
I don't need to slag anyone else to enhance my self-esteem. Crowing at
another team's misfortune to this extent is , at least, hurtful and
causes unneeded aggravation. Thats not the way of the average Irish
Football Fan. We're party dudes, not hooligans. We've built up a damn
good name as civilised supporters. Lets maintain that good name both on
the terraces *and* in the notes file.
*Tiger*
|
129.546 | England are nearly out. | ESSB::MCUNNIFFE | Pool-73,76,77,79,80,82-4,86,88,90 | Fri Jun 04 1993 21:47 | 37 |
| <<< Note 129.544 by ESSB::PHAYDEN "It's not how long it takes but how well you do it..." >>>
-< Good one ! >-
>>> (Nothing closet about, I'm IRISH and not
>>> particularly proud of our style of football)
There is absolutely nothing wrong with our style of football. In players
like Aldridge, Whelan, Houghton, Townsend, Keane, Staunton, Phelan, Irwin &
Mcgrath, we have the best footballers in Europe. Ireland can play attractive
football against any side.
Even if they did play boring football, it doesn't matter as long as the
result is right. Football is not about nice attractive football played on the
ground. It's about getting a result if that means kicking the ball into the
stands to keep a 1-0 lead. Where did Cloughie's nice brand of football get
him??.
Getting back to England, they were pathetic the last night. The FAT MARS BOY
didn't get a look in. It's a pity somebody didn't break his jaw again. Maybe
he would have come out of his sleep. Lee Sharpe on the left wing was worse
than useless. Well done to the Norwegians.
When Taylor looks at the plonkers in his midfield, he must be very envious of
Big Jack with midfielders like Staunton, Keane, Townsend, Houghton & Whelan
and a lethal strike force of Aldo & Quinn plus two of the best international
full backs in Irwin & Phelan.
Look's like we are the only country out of the five local countries to be
going to the USA. I would love to see Wales get there as well.
C U N N O
|
129.547 | | MASALA::GPIKE | Up the Rosey Posey. | Sat Jun 05 1993 03:53 | 14 |
|
ref note .532 about Arsenal.
About 3yrs ago I watched Arsenal play Liverpool in an English Cup match
at Anfield. Now for a team thats susposed to be full of spoilers they
played Liverpool off the park due too really entertaining and good
football, but due to a bit off brillance by Barnes the game ended with
a draw. I,m not an Arsenal susporter by I do disagree that they're
spoliers and bad for the game.
I'm also glad England got beat as they've been slagging Norway for some
time now and they got what there display on the night deserved.
Gordon.
|
129.548 | Gloating suspended | OSLACT::HENRIKW | Good news is a bad omen | Mon Jun 07 1993 13:15 | 15 |
| Amid all the online hooligans in the FOOTBALL conference,
reply 542 was a pleasure to read.
As a Norwegian, I must admit I even enjoyed every "note set hidden"
after last week's game - interpreting them as additional proof of
our success. ;^) Triviawise, it should be noted that the Norwegian
TV commentator last week is one of Norway's biggest fans of English
football. He had a hard time accepting the fact that this time
Norway played as excellently as England used to do, whereas England
looked like the typical Norwegian playing from some years back.
I'll refrain from further gloating until we've played Holland
on Wednesday...
Henrik
|
129.549 | FA cup final 93..the worst one ever ?? | MIACT::RANKINE | | Mon Jun 07 1993 16:27 | 8 |
| re -2
Ill think youll find that the comment on Arsenal was that 3 yrs ago
they were playing good football. Its just that recently they seemed to
have adopted a stifle the opposition and depend on the break style of
play which is not great to watch...a la Bayern Munich in the 70's.
Paul
|
129.550 | Do the Midfield Shake-up | ARNIES::SMITHP1 | P U S H O double F | Mon Jun 07 1993 20:38 | 19 |
| > re: Note 129.526 by YUPPY::ASHLEYSMITH "whoops, there goes another year.."
>
> Anyone here Trevor Brookings comments when Les Ferdinand missed
> England's only real "chance" early in the 2nd half.
>
> "finishing is not his strong point"
>
> England's centre forward can't finish. Frightening isn't it.
Shows what Brooking knows ! Players like Sherringham, and
Ferdinand 'finish' for their club sides. The reason they are
failing in this respect, for their country, is due to lack
of decent balls from midfield. However, in my opinion you need
forwards that can fight for a ball as well as finish, not the
'standing around on the off chance that the ball might come along'
beloved of certain England forwards who will remain nameless.
p1
|
129.551 | Norway still have everything to prove | STKOFF::SPERSSON | Pas de probleme | Mon Jun 07 1993 21:31 | 34 |
|
>> Thought I'd balance the England-bashing in here by putting in some
>> Norway-bashing :-)
>
> You are Swedish, aren't you ?
Correct.
> So the fact that we have these results:
>
> Norway - Holland 2-1
> England - Norway 1-1
> Norway - England 2-0
> Norway - Turkey 3-1
> Norway - San Marino 10-0
> San Marino - Norway 0-4
>
> 22 scored - 3 behind Thorstvedt
>
> makes us a 3rd rate team ? So what is a 1st or a 2nd rate team ?
It's simply too early for the hype. Show some realistic expectations,
don't fly so high and maybe it won't hurt so much when you fall down.
The list above shows very well what I'm trying to say. You've played
minnows (San Marino, Turkey), has-beens (England) and admittedly got one
good result (Holland). You still have to meet the two main competitors
of the group, Holland and Poland, away from home. Get results there and
I'll change my mind.
cheers,
Stefan
|
129.552 | Let's not give up the ghost! | KEEGAN::TURNER | | Mon Jun 07 1993 21:35 | 42 |
| >I'm Irish and I object to some of the cr*p thats being written against the
>English. It's almost like some of us are so insecure in our sense of worth
>as a sovereign and independent people that we must deride the English to
>derive any self-belief in *OUR*selves and *our* abilities.
Tiger, I certainly didn't have any of *your* notes in mind when I
criticised the general nature of the Irish/Scottish entries in 129! On
the contrary, you've been more constructive in your criticism than the
vast majority of the English noters.
As for the Irish fans, I've yet to hear a bad word about them. Contrast
that with our shower. The only relief on Wednesday night came from the
news that nearly all the arrests had been made BEFORE the match -
there's nothing worse than losing and then being classed as poor
losers.
I can remember going to see Belgium v England in Bologna during WC90.
It probably wasn't a vintage performance by the England fans but they
still managed to make a nuisance of themselves. Fortunately, I had no
problem blending in with the locals and I'd bought my ticket in Milan
anyway, so I was able to watch the game with a group of Belgians, a
couple of Italians and a couple of the more civilised England
supporters.
Re. what needs to be done with English football, I can't agree with
those who think a total shakeup is necessary, although I wouldn't mind
seeing a few changes on the administrative side. I don't see any
problem with the sort of players who are coming out of our system -
although we have capped a few players in the last couple of years who I
wouldn't personally consider international quality (Sinton, Curle,
Merson, perhaps one or two others). Holland, Germany, Italy and Brazil
all have their equivalents of Batty and Palmer - don't tell me that
Wouters, Reuter, Dunga and Dino Baggio are thoroughbreds!
Anyway, there's still room for optimism. Holland will be delighted with
that last result if only because it's taken the spotlight off their own
team who have been nothing less than appalling since EC92. I'd
sincerely like to know from Mr. Tanner exactly what he finds
entertaining about the current Dutch team, Bergkamp apart.
Dom
|
129.553 | Fergie | HEAVY::WARD | | Mon Jun 07 1993 22:10 | 9 |
| RE: alot-further-back-but-I-can't-remember-the-number ..
If Alex Ferguson (he from swoon! ManU) were to manage England, not
only would he have led a Scottish and England club side to winning
their respecive leagues, but he would also have led the National
teams (not saying where though). Remember - he was Scotland
manager for WC86 ..
Ray
|
129.554 | | HEAVY::WARD | | Mon Jun 07 1993 22:12 | 3 |
| Also - is the Holland-Norway match being shown on English TV ??
Thanks - Ray
|
129.555 | Platt out, Ince in | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Finishing's not his strong point | Tue Jun 08 1993 14:06 | 12 |
| I read on CEEFAX this morning that Paul Ince is to Captain England in the U.S.
Perhaps there is hope after all...
Taylor says the Norway game showed how much we miss Ince, and I think he's right.
We would have wasted Norway if we'd had Ince. 8-) Yeah, right.
On Sunday I read an article in the Observer in which John Fashanu claimed that he
was absolutely that England would have a black Captain before too long, and that
it would probably be Paul Ince. Cor, is he a mindreader or what?
Mike
|
129.556 | Van Basten, Guillit, Rijkaard are no longer class players eh!!!!!!!! | KBOMFG::TANNER | Californian Girls are more fun!!!!! | Tue Jun 08 1993 19:35 | 27 |
|
Re Dom....
Dom don't forget that Holland haven't fielded their full team since Euro 92.
In fact in the game against Poland most of them were missing. Most Knowledgeable
football fans would agree with me that Van Basten is one of the most deadly
strikers around at the moment. He just returned a month ago after been out for
three months. Do you honestly believe that Palmer or Batty would get on the
English team if Rijkaard was English??? If you believe that then England may end
up getting a "wild card" for the States because of some war or whatever.....
You also compared Dino Baggio to the likes of Batty and Palmer, I hope he
doesn't find that out!!!! He alone scored three goals for Juve against Dortmund
in the UEFA cup final, and finished second highest scorer for Juve in the whole
competition after his namesake Roberto.
When Holland field their full strength team with the above mentioned and also
Koemann, and probably Roy, Winter, and Wittschke then we should see one of the
best footballing teams in action again. Another aspect missing from the Holland
team is motivation, something Iam sure Cruyff would sort out....
Ok Dom I hope this satisfies your queries.....
-dave-
P.s Ton or any other Dutch fan out there, what is the probable lineup for
tomorrow nights big match?????
|
129.557 | Orange-tinted spectacles? | KEEGAN::TURNER | | Tue Jun 08 1993 20:26 | 67 |
| re: .556
Dave,
>Dom don't forget that Holland haven't fielded their full team since Euro
>92.
Nor have England. (Pearce, Shearer, Gascoigne, Ince, Wright, Dorigo,
Ferdinand et al have all missed matches...oops, I forgot - the English
aren't allowed to make excuses, are they?)
>Most Knowledgeable football fans would agree with me that Van Basten is
>one of the most deadly strikers around at the moment. He just returned
>a month ago after been out for three months.
Couldn't agree more, but he'll now be undergoing another operation on
his ankle and it remains to be seen whether he ever *fully* recovers.
Certainly, he wasn't the player of old in the European Cup final.
>Do you honestly believe that Palmer or Batty would get on the English team
>if Rijkaard was English???
I didn't compare them with Rijkaard; I compared them (as "workhorses")
with Wouters. And yes, I think Batty is better than Wouters in most
departments, with the exception of shooting...and elbowing. As for
Rijkaard, I haven't seen him play three good games this year here in Italy.
Great player 2 years ago; at Wembley, he was a ghost. Gullit wasn't even
that.
>You also compared Dino Baggio to the likes of Batty and Palmer, I hope he
>doesn't find that out!!!! He alone scored three goals for Juve against
>Dortmund in the UEFA cup final, and finished second highest scorer for
>Juve in the whole competition after his namesake Roberto.
Granted football's all about scoring, but I do recall that a couple of
years back, Man Utd's top scorer (or second top) on the way to winning
the European Cup Winners' Cup was Steve Bruce. Enough said? I recently
saw Dino Baggio struggle for Italy against Switzerland before being
sent off for an outrageous tackle.
>When Holland field their full strength team with the above mentioned and
>also Koemann, and probably Roy, Winter, and Wittschke then we should see
>one of the best footballing teams in action again. Another aspect missing
>from the Holland team is motivation, something Iam sure Cruyff would sort
>out....
Well, count Roy out for a start; the Dutch manager has said he
considers him to be too "lilly-livered" for international football.
Winter? Excellent player? Koemann? Great going forward, disastrous in
defence. Wittschke? Mediocrity City, Arizona!
As I said, Gullit feels he can't produce the goods at international
level any more (Keown didn't give him a kick at Wembley) and has decided to
retire from international football. Note that Gullit, Rijkaard and Van
Basten have all said at various times that playing for Holland under
Advocaat (sp?) is *not* a joyful experience and do not like the way
the team is playing.
And, if you recall, my original query was about your saying that
Holland play spectacular football. Well, they certainly used to...
Dom
P.S. None of which will stop you being delighted if Holland win
tomorrow - but I doubt if champagne football's got anything to do with
it.
|
129.558 | | XSTACY::MDUNPHY | Just another Day!! | Tue Jun 08 1993 22:17 | 6 |
|
Is the Norway Holland game Live on any English TV Station??
If not will there be highlights
Thanks
Mick
|
129.559 | A whole team of them ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Wed Jun 09 1993 00:21 | 9 |
|
> ...oops, I forgot - the English aren't allowed to make excuses, are they?
What do you mean ? The English excuse for a manager has chosen a whole
team of excuses as players ! (Well almost)
Come on Ye Orange's !
An Impartial Celt.
|
129.560 | Possibly RTL-4.... | GYMAC::DCASSIDY | | Wed Jun 09 1993 15:20 | 14 |
|
The best bet for seeing the game might be for anyone with a Satellite
dish and RTL-4 which is on Astra (transponder 13). They have shown all
of Holland's previous matches.
Looks like tonight will be busy in front of the box
6:00 Latvia v Ireland
8:00 Holland v Norway
12:00 US v England....
Lucky its a day's holiday tomorrow here in Germany...
Regards,
Dezzz.
|
129.561 | HOLLAND HOLLAND HOLLAND | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Wed Jun 09 1993 15:30 | 37 |
| this is the most likely line-up for tonight (not my line-up mind you)
de Goey
van Gobbel Koeman de Boer
Rijkaard
Jonk Bergkamp Wouters
Overmars Bosman Blinker
I personally would have played van Vossen and Bergkamp up front,
Jonk in the middle of midfield, Wouters on the right en Witschge
on the left and would certainly not have played van Gobbel at
left back but preferred de Wolf.
subs:
Snelders, van Vossen, Winter, Witschge, de Wolf
VAn BAsten is again out with the same ankle injury and will have an operation
again, hope he won't follow Gullit :-((
When Holland qualifies for the US, Cruijff wil take over from Advocaat.
I've got a ticket for tonight (the best seats for free and even tickets for
the party after the game, just a matter of having the right connections I guess)
, so I'll be off early today.
T_
|
129.562 | Wish I were there ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Wed Jun 09 1993 15:58 | 8 |
|
>I've got a ticket for tonight (the best seats for free and even tickets for
>the party after the game, just a matter of having the right connections I guess)
>, so I'll be off early today.
You lucky lucky basta'd ! ( Copywrite 'Life of Brian')
An Impartial Celt.
|
129.563 | TV tonight in England | FORTY2::ASH | Grahame Ash @REO | Wed Jun 09 1993 16:31 | 7 |
| ITV is showing 'football' tonight at 2240. Unfortunately, it looks as if
they're going to concentrate on USA v England (KO 2300), but we might get 5
mins each of the Irish and Dutch/Norwegian games before it.
I am an English supporter but I'd rather see a real game . . .
grahame
|
129.564 | Taylor now in the proverbial "No Win" situation | TRUCKS::SANT | This is as good as it gets! | Wed Jun 09 1993 18:23 | 6 |
|
Yup, England's latest debacle will be screened I think live,
whereas the majority of football followers would rather see
a game that matters.
Andy.
|
129.565 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Finishing's not his strong point | Wed Jun 09 1993 20:58 | 16 |
| Nah. I'd rather watch England even if they are lousy.
Anything else is just being a fair-weather fan (or exhibiting common sense).
I think we'll win this one 3-0, with people like Batty being especially important
in kicking the "not especially physical" Americans off the ball.
There are no Italian-based types playing, so expect it to be fast and physical
on our part: Taylor to return to the tactics that did him so well at Lincoln,
Watford, and Villa.
And if we don't win.... I'll eat my hat. 8-)
Again.
Mike
|
129.566 | one up | DBOT07::RUSSELL | WEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93 | Wed Jun 09 1993 21:18 | 3 |
| Aldo has scored after 15 mins
Latvia 0-1 Ireland.
|
129.567 | That's what I heard... | CLARID::KREYER | Andre KREYER - Valbonne | Thu Jun 10 1993 01:59 | 6 |
|
For what it is worth....
Holland 0 - 0 Norway
.Andre.
|
129.568 | Miracles happen | OSLACT::HENRIKW | Good news is a bad omen | Thu Jun 10 1993 12:04 | 14 |
| > For what it is worth....
>
> Holland 0 - 0 Norway
To Norway, it's worth a lot! :^) Especially since Holland
outplayed us completely in the first half. This was a different
ballgame altogether, after the victory over a weak English team.
I feel sorry for the Dutch, though, who came as close to scoring
as you'll ever do. Several times. A cold comfort may be that Norway
at least didn't get a lucky goal like the one at Wembley. The result is
unfair as it is. So the one point is celebrated as a victory here.
Henrik
|
129.569 | Free ticket, free beer, lousy game | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Thu Jun 10 1993 12:23 | 22 |
| rep -1
Henrik,
it was also celebrated as a victory by the Norway supporters who followed the
team to Holland. The Dutch supporter incl myself were totally guttered, we
indeed outplay the Norwegians the first half and Bosman should at least scored
two goals but failed in front of an open goal.
The second half was a damn shame for the Dutch and the only good players then
where van Gobbel, Rijkaard and Overmars.
I got home quite late 'cause the beer was free in the place we were after the
game (it's always nice to have contacts with big sponsors :-))) and I must admit
I was quite p*ssed too :-))
Holland now has to win their remaining three matches wich will be very difficult
but if they keep playing the way they did yesterday they don't deserve to go to
the US of A.
T_
|
129.570 | THE BAD GET WORSE | MACNAS::SMORAN | | Thu Jun 10 1993 12:24 | 5 |
| Mike,
Do you want salt for your HAT
USA 2 0 England
|
129.571 | Very Sad | SUBURB::GROOMN | Bring back Poll Tax | Thu Jun 10 1993 12:59 | 30 |
|
Two fine finishes from the U.S. team beat a hopless England outfit. For
me the only player who shone was Gary Pallister whose timely
interventions on several occasions prevented certain goals. The team
looks knackered and bereft of ideas (as I am after staying up to watch
it) Graham Taylor admitted it was a 'low point' in his career, I
suggest he resigns before he becomes unemployable.
Ian Wright missed three sitters, Barnes (was he playing), Sharp had
little service, Ince was workmanlike but appeared burdened by his new
responsibility. Palmer looked promising and Walker when he came on
didn't. Woods might have got to the corner first but otherwise did no
wrong. Batty should have had a penalty towards the end of the first
half.
All in all, another nail in Taylor's coffin (there can't be much room
for many more). England are sadly missing a true replacement for
Lineker, I guess it's a little sad that Shearer's been missing for the
majority of the season, but it's sadder that he appears to be the only
one capable of filling Nice Gary's boots. England also missed the
Michelin man and Platt, both who recently have appeared out of sorts
(especially Gassa), again though it's worrying that we are so reliant
upon these two performing, there again nothing has really changed as it
was only a few years ago that the team relied almost singularly upon
Captain Robbo the Marvelous.
All spout I'm afraid, no real suggestionsm, where to now ?
Nev.
|
129.572 | What odds England to qualify? | GALVIA::SPAIN | Taylor must STAY | Thu Jun 10 1993 13:18 | 14 |
|
I didn't see either of last night's games. However the Dutch result
was good news for England. A draw in Rotterdam may now suffice. Okay on
current form you wouldn't back England to get a draw in San Marino but
come the Autumn things could be very different.
Anyone know what odds the bookies are giving this morning on England
qualifying?
Norway should now be safe enough. Holland look suspect and Poland now
appear to be in the driving seat for the second spot. I still have
doubt sabout the Poles though.
Gary.
|
129.573 | | PLUNDR::LOWEG | You don't want to do it like that!! | Thu Jun 10 1993 13:22 | 6 |
|
Only thing worth saying is that David Batty last night did what Gazza
is supposed... Well done David..
g.
|
129.574 | Are going to the Boston Tea Party? | YUPPY::PATEMAN | Scuba Dive in my Think Tank | Thu Jun 10 1993 13:33 | 31 |
| Was it really worth staying up until 1am for this?!?!
As one of the R5 guys said this morning - who else is there? Shearer
will add some class when he is fit, as will Platt and a fit Gascoigne,
but we are leaking goals at a frightening rate. Atkinson's comment
about getting back to defenders who defend rather than act as wingers
has a lot of merit. We also need some stability.
There seems to be this theory that we have to play differently as
England than in the League (Coppell said that Wright was not at all in
tune with league style when he got back from England) Why don't we just
play to our strengths?
A flat back 4. A ball winner and a skill player in the centre of
midfield and two wide players who can cross, and a settled pair of goal
scorers up front.
For all that - Ian Wright would have had at least a hat-trick in an
Arsenal or Palace shirt last night - he looked scared to try things.
Taylor cannot be blamed for injuries and a weak squad but he must take
the rap for formations and motivation.
Assuming everybody was fit in the autumn how about:
Seaman (or Martyn)
Jones Bruce Pallister Pearce
Platt Ince Gascoigne Salako
Shearer Wright
Looks a little more solid than last nights mob.
Paul
|
129.575 | Go Go Go Go ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Thu Jun 10 1993 13:36 | 13 |
|
Oh what a shame !
I will not gloat over such a result. I just feel sorry for all of those
misguided English fans who lived in the false hope that the Norway
result was a once off. TAYLOR MUST GO ! Even if they do manage to win
their next two matches it can not hide the incompetence of that fool.
The players are there for you to have a decent team (not a great one)
but how can players who have little or no respect for a manager ever
gel into a competitive unit.
An Impartial Celt.
|
129.576 | the Taylor and Angsty | ESSB::BREE | | Thu Jun 10 1993 13:37 | 27 |
|
England may have been very bad last night but I think the U.S. looked
like a very good team. They had a lot of skill going forward and did
not shirk anything in the tackle.
They could be a real threat in the W.C. because they are unlikely to be
burdened with expectation and hopefully will have the confidence to
push it around.
It was good to see the Manchester United contingent doing well. Surely
Pallister gets the nod over Adams now?
For England, they've got to get Taylor out now. He's a nice guy but
what they need is someone independent of the F.A. blazers. Without
harping on about our success, Charlton does precisely what he wants
with the team and the F.A.I. officials are there to see that the
pitches are lined and the jerseys washed.
Hence there is no conflict of interest and no need to create a press
image. The only image needed is a that of a winning team playing to its
strengths.
Forget about looking for good press coverage. If you get the results
the press coverage will follow appropriately.
Paul
|
129.577 | | TRUCKS::SANT | This is as good as it gets! | Thu Jun 10 1993 13:38 | 16 |
|
Sheesh......embarassed isn't the word for it....
I think despair might be.
Have we become a second-rate footballing country at national
level? Our league is strong, but the English national side
looks so short on quality. People rave about Clough (jnr),
but all he does is a basic skill - pass the ball accurately
to feet. Even against the USA he looked slow and out of his
depth. Barnes...words fail me. Palmer was awful as a centre-half
imo. Pallister saved us from a more humiliating scoreline.
Wright had at least three clear chances and missed them all.
Enough said.
Andy.
|
129.578 | the pea is very underrated vegetable.. | ESSB::BREE | | Thu Jun 10 1993 13:40 | 3 |
| I think Norman Lamont should take over the team.
Paul
|
129.579 | Were they Playing to get rid of Taylor? | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Thu Jun 10 1993 13:52 | 1 |
|
|
129.580 | England : Worst team in int. football | PLUNDR::MORAN | DANGER: Volatile Database on the Loose | Thu Jun 10 1993 14:04 | 33 |
|
> England may have been very bad last night but I think the U.S. looked
> like a very good team. They had a lot of skill going forward and did
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Boll*cks! The US looked like a fairly mediocre international side,
but certainly did have good athletes with patches of good technical
ability throughout the team. They were not too bad going forward but they
were pretty poor defensively, making loads of mistakes and giving the
English forwards more space than they've had in the last 5 internationals
put together (I don't mean to be disrespectful to the Americans).
Unfortunately, England were far worse than the Americans and I can't see
half of that team ever playing for England again. They were a disgrace
and should be doing hard time in Parkhurst for that performance. It's
baffling how this team has sunk to the depths so quickly after looking a
half decent side in Italia '90.
I think it's time for Taylor to go. He obviously can't motivate good
club players when it comes to pulling on an England shirt. Other
personnel I'd like to see go are Woods (couldn't catch a cold), Dixon
(he was our best attacking option yesterday and he can't pass!),
Palmer (not international quality), Clough (showed yesterday once and
for all that he's not good enough), Barnes (he's had too many 2nd
chances already and will never get the same amount of space to not
perform in, that he had yesterday) and Dixon (again!!- he's that bad).
Positive points: 1) it was a friendly.
2) Pallister and Batty, both played well
3) Holland drew.
4) Last time we lost to the US, we won the world cup
16 years later!!! ;-)
Tim
|
129.581 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Finishing's not his strong point | Thu Jun 10 1993 14:18 | 18 |
| Oh bo***cks.
Words fail me. Except for a few obvious four-letter ones.
How could we lose to the US? It's like them losing to us at Baseball or
something.
I agree with the team selection a few notes ago: come in Steve Bruce, your
country needs you.
Meanwhile, why doesn't Taylor give Earl Barrett a go. He can't do any worse than
the pack of donkeys he fielded last night. drop the whole team, that's what I
say.
Good news about Holland dropping a point, but what chance have we got of getting
a point in Holland and beating Poland?
Mike
|
129.582 | God has a weird sense of humour | STKOFF::SPERSSON | Pas de probleme | Thu Jun 10 1993 14:33 | 18 |
|
Well,
Congratulations (sort of) to Norway for getting another result,
although they were (as expected) totally outplayed by an off-form
reserve-studded Dutch team. Since it is now likely that Lucky Norway
qualify, we temporarily lift them from the 3rd rate list where they
belong. They'll be back there soon enough.
USA - England 2-0 puts the "new Norwegian Super Team" somewhat in
perspective doesn't it?
Still, hope Norway get to the US, and that they end up in the same
group as Sweden. We could use the points :-)
cheers,
Stefan
|
129.583 | Hardly a miracle | OSLACT::HENRIKW | Good news is a bad omen | Thu Jun 10 1993 15:08 | 6 |
| >> -< God has a weird sense of humour >-
He sure has. Not only was Norway saved from humiliation yesterday,
but He's even created Swedes. ;^)
Henrik
|
129.584 | thats the way it goes... | DBOT07::RUSSELL | WEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93 | Thu Jun 10 1993 15:38 | 16 |
| I would truly hate to be an England supporter right now. It must be so
embarassing. I dont agree that the players are at fault. These are (in
the main) the team that performed well up to and including Italia '90.
I think Taylor's management is at fault, plain and simple.
England were outclassed last night, in the basics of the
game...control, passing, vision, ability to take their chances.
They are a frightened team.
Fair play to the USA, they took their chances really well. Their
supporters were vociferous and appreciative. Their play may have been a
little naive at times, but the game needs a lot less cynicism and a bit
more naivete. Well done.
*Tiger*
|
129.585 | | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Thu Jun 10 1993 16:00 | 10 |
|
Well, we've been embarressed for the second game on the trot, nothing
much more to say, the U.S.A took there chances England didn't. Another
day Wright could have had three but failed against some inspired
goalkeeping and poor finishing. Looking to Sunday we need to improve
drastically to get any sort of result but I can't see this slump lasting
to long and there's no better side to get back to winning ways against
than the Brazilians.
Neil..
|
129.586 | Remember 1950! | XSTACY::JLUNDON | @GAO 822-4715 Apathy is the most terrible vice! | Thu Jun 10 1993 16:13 | 0 |
129.587 | NO!! | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Thu Jun 10 1993 16:31 | 2 |
|
|
129.588 | In those days it was a shock :-) | GALVIA::SPAIN | Taylor must STAY | Thu Jun 10 1993 16:36 | 7 |
|
Re -2,
showing your age James. :-)
Gary.
|
129.589 | John Atyeo RIP | GALVIA::SPAIN | Taylor must STAY | Thu Jun 10 1993 16:40 | 12 |
|
probably not the right topic
John Atyeo died suddenly on Tuesday. He was an English International
in the 50s who played with West Brom and Bristol City (I think anyone
else?).
He's best remembered by Irish fans for a famous last gasp equaliser in
Dalymount that sent England to Sweden rather than Ireland for the 1958
world cup.
Gary.
|
129.590 | Swedes - a godsend ???? | OSL09::NWO506::ARNEK | Never trust a pretty interace | Thu Jun 10 1993 16:43 | 11 |
|
re. 583
>> He sure has. Not only was Norway saved from humiliation yesterday,
>> but He's even created Swedes. ;^)
You should be careful implying that Swedes are created by God, Henrik. I
know that God supposedly acts in mysterious ways, but creating Swedes
is not merely mysterious, it's plain and simple cruelty! :-)
--arne
|
129.591 | Hang on a minute ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Thu Jun 10 1993 17:06 | 10 |
|
Wo ! Between the Irish/Scots and the English and the Norwegians and the
Swedes we are really getting racist here. Just wait till the Dutch and
the Danes tune in. A regular volcano of national identity just waiting to
errupt. What have we started here ? How can we live with this monster
which has been created ?
Keep it up Lads !
An Impartial Celt.
|
129.592 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | DANGER: Volatile Database at large | Thu Jun 10 1993 17:57 | 7 |
|
Just read that a sports shop in Alnwick, Northumberland is giving aways
free England strips with each turnip purchased (or should that be vice
versa?). Sales are booming. It's good to see that we still have a sense of
humour.
Tim
|
129.593 | Alex Stewart in goal??? | FORTY2::ROBERTSON | Living with Flamingos on the DELTA | Thu Jun 10 1993 18:00 | 24 |
| I, like a fool, stayed up to watch last night. I thought that the game on the
whole was open and flowing and felt I was entertained. However, entertaining
though it was, the standard was closer to the GM Vauxhall Conference than the
international arena.
I for was was quietly happy about the result as my father is American, but I
was thoroughly disappointed by the English display. The players weren't
interested and as someone on the commentary team said, they should have been
sunning themselves on a beach in Majorca, relaxing after a long hard season.
I hope, for English International football's sake, that England get absolutely
trounced by both Brazil & Germany. Surely, the F.A. will have to then do
something about Taylor if he still won't quit. A new manager is definitely a must
now as there is still a glimmer of hope for qualification next year after last
nights 0-0 draw.
One of my colleagues just suggested that we fly the cricket team to Boston, and
bring the football team home to face Australia next week. Surely the results
couldn't be any worse ;-)
I for one am looking forward to saturday afternoon when England take on Germany,
at schoolboy level. These games are usually full of flair and excitement.
Al
|
129.594 | Woking Supporter | KERNEL::WITHALLG | Never heard of him | Fri Jun 11 1993 13:56 | 11 |
|
>> the standard was closer to the GM Vauxhall Conference than the
international arena.
Steady :-), Some people happen to like GM club football.
Gary
|
129.595 | Not that it matters to England, but .... | FUTURS::ROWELL | Conquistador, in search of gold | Fri Jun 11 1993 14:12 | 32 |
|
Current Group Two Standings
P W D L F A Pts
Norway..... 7 5 2 0 20 3 12
England.... 7 3 3 1 16 6 9
Holland.... 7 3 3 1 17 8 9
Poland..... 5 3 2 0 8 3 8
Turkey..... 8 1 1 6 7 17 3
San Marino. 8 0 1 7 1 32 1
Remaining Matches:
Sept 8: England v Poland
Sept 22: San Marino v Holland
Norway v Poland
Oct 13: Holland v England
Poland v Norway
Oct 27: Turkey v Poland
Nov 10: Turkey v Norway
Nov 16: San Marino v England
Nov 17: Poland v Holland
|
129.596 | Could this be four defeats on the trot????!!!!!! | KBOMFG::TANNER | Californian Girls are more fun!!!!! | Fri Jun 11 1993 17:37 | 11 |
|
After watching the Brazil v Germany game last night, I reckon the US cup
will turn out to be similiar to Euro 88 ie three games and three defeats....
England were crap, but the states played with a lot of heart, and fully
deserved their result. Two aspects of the game that stood out in my eyes were
1) The performance of Miolta sp! in goals... and
2) The tackle on Tom Dooley which could have smashed his leg up. He was replaced
but I don't know what the injury is.
-dave-
|
129.597 | Poles apart | REOSV1::ONEILLS | | Sat Jun 12 1993 03:39 | 6 |
| Do I get the impression that a team one point behind the might of
Holland and England with two games on hand, two home games to come,
and that have only once ever lost a home game in the WC are perceived
as inferior? Where's my local Corals/Ladbrokes?
Shane
|
129.598 | Taylor a hero??? | KIRKTN::GDOUGALL | G'DAY COBBER!!! | Mon Jun 14 1993 00:45 | 2 |
| Brazil 1 England 1
?? Platt
|
129.599 | Taylor on course | ESSB::BREE | | Mon Jun 14 1993 12:33 | 8 |
| re:598
This result certainly confirms that England have shaken off the bad
breaks of the past few weeks and re-establishes them as one of the
world's greatest teams.
Paul
|
129.600 | A turn up for the books | REPROT::BIGBJJ::SWAINM | I was only asleep.... | Mon Jun 14 1993 13:38 | 5 |
| So how was their performance or did England hang on for a fluky draw?
One of the worlds greatest teams ? mmm..... I have my doubts.
Matt.
|
129.601 | | FORTY2::ROBERTSON | Living with Flamingos on the DELTA | Mon Jun 14 1993 13:50 | 7 |
| re .599
Paul you forgot all those smileys ;-)
However, yesterday's match was a vast improvement over the last few weeks.
Al
|
129.602 | OUR BOYS BASH BRAZIL.! | DBOT07::RUSSELL | WEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93 | Mon Jun 14 1993 14:51 | 38 |
|
England can hold their heads high again. With Manager Lord Graham
Taylor epitomising the English spirit of "never say die", standing at
the prow of his ship as it heaved and battled against the vicious
onslought of a storm of derision.
The team did everyone proud, they battled mightily against the slick
and cynical Brazilians and scored a well deserved goal just before
half-time. Sinton flicked over an inch perfect cross and good old David
Platt rose higher than any Amazonian Rain Forest to direct a smashing
header directly onto the post , where the goalie finished it off by
banging it over the line with his shoulder.
The second half gave Our Boys a great chance to show what brave
campaigners they are, as the Brazilian Hurricane pounded the Coastal
ramparts of the English defence. Time and Time again, super-hero Des
Walker (The man who is faster than Linford Christie) outsprinted the
ballet-like Brazilians to get in decisive tackles. Tony Dorigo held to
his post, despite nearly being washed away by the advancing tide of
Brazilian Blue. Indeed, on many ocassions England broke clear to
threaten the South American's goal, only to be denied by scathing
tackles and underhand shirt-pulling. It was almost like when Argentina
visited Wembley back in 196n, cynical tactics, always when the ref
wasnt looking etc.
As the sun rose higher and favoured the Brazilians, our boys began to
feel the pain of the heat, and the effects of having to play 750 games
each last season. The Amazonians broke through down the right, and
forced the ball home. England battled on supremely over the last 15
minutes to secure a thrilling draw, one which will put them in great
heart for the next game against Germany.
On the basis of this performance, England must be favourites to hit the
Krauts for six, and to take the World Cup in style for the next 20
years.
=====================================================================
filed - 13-June-1993, 21:00 GMT....copies to Ed. and my aunt Silvia....
|
129.603 | NOT ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Mon Jun 14 1993 14:57 | 20 |
|
Oh! Yes . England have SCORED !!!!!!!!!!! (Why the surprise Brain ?)
What a turaround. The mighty England last night showed that they *are*
the best team in the world. They won 1-1 against Brazil. Where's my hat
so I can eat it ? Oh what a preformance. That cultured header by
Plattie whizzed passed the outstreached arms of a flailing Brazilian
keeper. The keeper had no chance. True class ! And as for that
equalizer, well 'nuf said. A fluke if ever saw one. England deserved to
win ! They had a right to win. It's just not bloody fair that they
weren't alloed to win. It's their ball and they're going home unless
somebody allows them to win.
I hope all of you out there who were calling for the head of the great
and glorious manager Mr. Taylor are rightly ashamed and fully prepared
to enter an apology to all of us who have always had complete faith in
that genius of world football. Yes Mr. Taylor I love you and I'm sorry.
England, World Champions '94.
An Impartial Celt.
|
129.604 | re:602 Brilliant !!!!!! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Mon Jun 14 1993 15:02 | 1 |
|
|
129.605 | we'll meet again when there's blue birds over... | ESSB::BREE | | Mon Jun 14 1993 15:48 | 4 |
| I heard Graham Taylor was seen out celebrating last night with Vera
Lynn.
Paul
|
129.606 | England beat the boys from Brazil | UNTADH::WILCOCKSON | Back in Schlagrahmland | Mon Jun 14 1993 17:46 | 11 |
|
Thank god for that! - So England ARE the best team in the world after all,
and all this nonsense about Sir Graham T is been shown up for what it
really is - bolshy tosh!
C'mon you English chappys (Irish, Welsh and Scots included here of
course), all together...
Land of hope and glory,
Mother of the free...
|
129.607 | | TRUCKS::SANT | This is as good as it gets! | Mon Jun 14 1993 18:31 | 9 |
|
Well I didn't watch the game, but having just read a few cynical
tributes in here hardly feel as if I've missed anything.
So we're crap, but it's Quality crap 8-)
A-genuinly-impartial-Englishman-who-doesn't-get-upset-by-racist-
colonials-obsessed-with-doing-us-down ;-)
|
129.608 | C'Mon England...C'Mon England... | DBOT07::RUSSELL | WEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93 | Mon Jun 14 1993 19:16 | 8 |
| re -1....
We're not rascist...and we're certainly not colonials...8^)
Tiger$The-Wild-Colonial-Boy.
I think we should start up our own gutter-paper...oh hang on , the
first two words of that sentence excludes me from working there....
|
129.609 | Well, you're certainly not colonials... | KEEGAN::TURNER | | Mon Jun 14 1993 19:23 | 8 |
|
> I think we should start up our own gutter-paper...oh hang on , the
> first two words of that sentence excludes me from working there....
Oh, I dunno! Just call it "The Dublin Post" and I think (allow me!) we can
turn a blind eye...
Dom
|
129.610 | Oh Lord its hard to be humble .... | FUTURS::ROWELL | Conquistador, in search of gold | Mon Jun 14 1993 19:26 | 7 |
|
Whats this ?????
No mention of the U21 result ????
;)
Wayne
|
129.611 | Wot no xenophobic comment? | PLUNDR::MORAN | DANGER: Volatile Database at large | Mon Jun 14 1993 19:32 | 8 |
|
Wrong topic, but seen as someone's already mentioned it, but does
anyone know when the final of the Toulon U21 is, and is it on TV?
Tim.
Ps. Congrats to Scotland for getting so far in the tournement. It bodes
well for the full team.
|
129.612 | nothing like a smile..eh? | DBOT07::RUSSELL | WEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93 | Mon Jun 14 1993 19:52 | 9 |
| attaboy, Dom...humour in the face of adversity, stiff upper lip 'n' all
that.
You'll go far, my lad..
8^)
*Tiger*$seeing-the-funny-side-of-life..
|
129.613 | Run along now! | KEEGAN::TURNER | | Mon Jun 14 1993 20:03 | 16 |
| re: .612
Now, now - you know I'm only trying to keep you away from your Jimmy
Hill videos and the piles of tabloids you all have delivered to your
door.
Smile? We can hardly contain ourselves! That 1-1 draw with Brazil seems
to be causing more sleepless nights in Dublin than the Blitz ever did
in London.
Still, yer gorra laff ain't yer!
Dom
P.S. Shouldn't you be out celebrating that 2-0 demolition of Latvia
like the rest of 130?
|
129.614 | Ah sure ! We'll stay for the Party :-) | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Mon Jun 14 1993 21:02 | 16 |
|
re:613
We only celebrate our success for a limited period i.e until our next
success, this Wednesday.
But if you've been celebrating and living in hope since 1966 you may not
understand this phenomenon.
Well I'll bet Germany are shaking in their boots ! Celebrate a
theoretical victory while you have the chance. It may be a long time
before the opportunity comes around again.
An Impartial Celt.
|
129.615 | ho ho | FORTY2::ETHERIDGE | Phhhff! Well good luck! | Mon Jun 14 1993 21:35 | 5 |
| ESSB::PHAYDEN seems to have quietened the activity of the English
noters in this topic, by cunningly boring the crap out off us.
Well done!
Ian.
|
129.616 | About as cunning as Attila the Hun! | KEEGAN::TURNER | | Mon Jun 14 1993 21:45 | 15 |
|
>ESSB::PHAYDEN seems to have quietened the activity of the English
>noters in this topic, by cunningly boring the crap out off us.
^^^^^^^^^
>Well done!
"Cunning (adj.) Shrewd or crafty in manipulation..." (American Heritage
dictionary).
Naah, I don't think so somehow.
But as they never stop telling all and sundry, they're "such a noice,
quiet, friendly peeple", so I guess we can forgive them.
Dom
|
129.617 | Who rattled your cage? | SIOG::FITZPATRICK | | Mon Jun 14 1993 21:51 | 22 |
| >> <<< Note 129.616 by KEEGAN::TURNER >>>
>> -< About as cunning as Attila the Hun! >-
>>Note 129.542 World Cup qualifying Group 2 542 of 616
>>KEEGAN::TURNER 106 lines 4-JUN-1993 15:01
>> -< A few reflections >-
>>Well, I've been read-only in this conference for a long while now. I used to
>>participate in the old FOOTBALL conference but I've been loathe to do so in
>>this one, largely through lack of time and, quite frankly, because of the
>>feeling of boredom aroused by so many so-called football fans who are unable to
>>watch a game from a neutral point-of-view but have to resort to provoking those
>>who support a different team from them while defending the dubious merits of
>>their own team. Note 129 is the example to end all examples.
Well Dom,
Welcome to note 129. You're really getting into the swing of things.
Glad to see you found the time!
Cheers,
Michael.
|
129.618 | Apathy = Boredom ? | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Tue Jun 15 1993 13:49 | 13 |
|
Ian my firend,
Please don't try to flatter me. There is little I could do which could
bore the English noters any more than they already are.
Maybe the reason for the lack of notes is... SHAME ! It's strange, but
when your team are winning no one can shut you up, and yet, when you are
loosing, I can.
It's apathy not boredom which has stifled your literary flow of verbal
diarrhoea (There are exceptions of course) so as much as I would like
it, please don't credit me with such a triumph.
An Impartial Celt.
|
129.619 | | PLUNDR::LOWEG | You don't want to do it like that!! | Tue Jun 15 1993 13:55 | 12 |
|
re .618
Yaaaaaaawn
ZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...
|
129.620 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | DANGER: Volatile Database at large | Tue Jun 15 1993 14:02 | 9 |
|
It's bloody murder being an England fan in here. If they win, you
daren't put a note in for fear of getting accused of having overtly
nationalistic tendancies; if they lose you daren't put in a note in for
fear of being accused of being a bad loser and if you don't put a note in
whether they win, lose or draw, you get accused of being apathetic and
disinterested.
Sick and tired of Newcastle.
|
129.621 | Ya can wake up now Gary!!!!! | KBOMFG::TANNER | Californian Girls are more fun!!!!! | Tue Jun 15 1993 14:03 | 6 |
| Re .619...
Jasus Gary wake up, Englerand are na playing untill saturday. So ya can wake
up and do a weeks work before ya go back to sleep on saturday......:)
-dave-
|
129.622 | re: 620 C'est la vie ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Tue Jun 15 1993 15:55 | 1 |
|
|
129.623 | C'Mon Over to my place... | DBOT07::RUSSELL | WEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93 | Tue Jun 15 1993 16:37 | 10 |
| You are all cordially invited over to 130 for a few drinks, a bit of a
chat and some good decent slaggin', where no-one gets unnecessarily
huffed over anything.
I Thought Dom's 130.281 was excellent, nearly, almost as witty as
129.602....
8^)
*Tiger*
|
129.624 | A bit of friendly banter in this stressful world. | KEEGAN::TURNER | | Tue Jun 15 1993 16:59 | 15 |
| >You are all cordially invited over to 130 for a few drinks, a bit of a
>chat and some good decent slaggin', where no-one gets unnecessarily
>huffed over anything.
Tiger, I now know what people mean by "traditional Irish hospitality"!
Hope you won't accuse me of gatecrashing, though...
>I Thought Dom's 130.281 was excellent, nearly, almost as witty as
>129.602....
Hey, steady on! I've been living in Italy for nearly ten years now -
a bit of rustiness with the old mother tongue seems more than
reasonable in the circumstances.
Dom (and compliments for 129.602, you cheeky beggar!)
|
129.625 | | SUBURB::COMMIT | Commit Group | Tue Jun 15 1993 20:15 | 10 |
129.626 | how stupid can a name get? | SIOG::HANLON | | Tue Jun 15 1993 20:27 | 4 |
129.627 | | SUBURB::COMMIT | Commit Group | Tue Jun 15 1993 20:41 | 8 |
129.629 | Git ! | SUBURB::COMMIT | Commit Group | Tue Jun 15 1993 20:48 | 11 |
129.631 | Cool down Bob could be looking in? | XSTACY::JLUNDON | @GAO 822-4715 Apathy is the most terrible vice! | Tue Jun 15 1993 20:56 | 10 |
| re last few
For F**K sake cool down. You are wasting everyones time with this absolute
rubbish boths sides are going on about. If Palmer every wanted a reason for
closing down employee related notesfiles then all he has to do to prove his
point is look in here.
Back to normal business...
James.
|
129.632 | Nobhead | SUBURB::COMMIT | Commit Group | Tue Jun 15 1993 20:58 | 9 |
129.633 | TIME OUT ! | FUTURS::ROWELL | Conquistador, in search of gold | Tue Jun 15 1993 21:01 | 66 |
|
From note 2.2 8-AUG-1991
> Some basic conference rules.
> .
> .
> No foul or abusive language.
> .
> Please remember that this is a worldwide conference read by many
> people of different races and creeds.
From note 2.24 4-FEB-1992 ( Ron Glover's message )
> First, and most critically; the electronic mail systems and notes
> files are company facilities subject to normal workplace rules of
> conduct. As such, the same rules that govern conduct and comment
> in any other Digital workplace apply with equal weight in these
> systems. Stated simply, if you wouldn't say something in a
> Digital business meeting, you shouldn't say it in electronic mail
> or notes. PERIOD.
> Statements that attribute improper, illegal or immoral motives or
> actions to others; statements that cast aspersions on the
> character or integrity of others or that amount to libel or
> slander are not permitted. PERIOD. In this regard, it does not
> matter whether the individuals subject to the comment are elected
> public officials or directors of organizations disfavored by the
> author. There is no "Public Figure" exception in these systems.
> Comments of a sexual nature are not acceptable whether they are
> about the author or directed at others. Similarly, comments that
> degrade, devalue or discriminate against others are also
> prohibited.
From note 2.43 20-AUG-1992
> This conference is for discussing football. It is not to be used for
> insulting opposing fans or opposing teams.
All these words and warnings, and still they are totally ignored by a small
section of the community. Do you people actually 'understand' these rules ?
Do you realize that calling a certain player a donkey, or claiming that a
certain player or team is crap violates these rules. Not even a "GOTCHA"
note excuses violation of these rules. Try explaining "GOTCHA" to Ron Glover.
What surprises (and dismays) me, is the moderators who seem to ignore
even the most blatant of infractions, preferring to wait for someone to
complain before any action is taken. I have seen an instance where a note
has been set hidden (quite rightly) because the p-name insulted a member of
this conferance and yet a p-name exists with the *same* insult against a
certain football player, and those notes are unaffected. Hey, if one is wrong,
then so is the other.
If this is not checked, then it will not be long before this conference is
closed down. I, for one, do not want this to happen. Amid the dross in this
conference, there are constructive news and views that I appreciate reading,
even if is detrimental to my teams.
May I suggest that you all read the above mentioned notes fully, and ensure
that you understand them before you enter your next notes.
Kindest regards,
Wayne Rowell,
|
129.634 | | SUBURB::WAITEG | ANGER IS A GIFT | Tue Jun 15 1993 21:03 | 7 |
| Re 632
Though I agree with what Baz is saying can we discuss football its more
interesting!
Gary
|
129.635 | | XSTACY::MDUNPHY | Just another Day!! | Tue Jun 15 1993 21:05 | 9 |
|
Whens England's next game???
The Germans have been scoring frequently, so here's hoping for a good
game.
Hope Wright plays well
An Impartial Arsenal Fan!!!
|
129.636 | | SUBURB::WAITEG | ANGER IS A GIFT | Tue Jun 15 1993 21:09 | 7 |
| England play Germany on Thursday with a 7.00Pm kick-off.
Should be a good match. Germany look good in attack but weaker than
normal in defence.
Gary
|
129.638 | It's not what it seems | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Tue Jun 15 1993 21:35 | 19 |
|
re: .633
Look what you say is valid, to a point but the type of banter which has
been going on, in this string, to date, is not malicious (as far as I
can see). Neither is it bigotted or secterian, in the way the files of
two particular scotish teams were. I'm not racist ! (as certain people
seem to think). If you would just calm down a little and take the notes in
the light hearted manner in which they are intended and join in with
some of the *friendly* banter you may enjoy it.
Two cases in point. Tiger & Turner . Their stuff is brilliant and yet
each take digs at the others teams. Read 129.602 & 130.281 !
Every Irishman loves to rub it in when the English do badly (Except my
*English* father who cheers England all the way, in any Tournament) .
It ain't malicious I assure you. Let's get back to football talk. O.K
Peter. (An Impartial Celt)
|
129.639 | Are you sure? | WELCLU::BROWNI | The Man who sold the World | Tue Jun 15 1993 22:07 | 6 |
|
re: 637
I thought England-Germany was on Saturday..........
Ian (an impartial Brit!)
|
129.640 | Football here please. | MOEUR1::SMITH | | Wed Jun 16 1993 11:00 | 23 |
|
Wayne, thanks for that timely reminder,
re : .638 I think you should take your discussion someplace else, and
leave this conference for soccer talk.
>Look what you say is valid, to a point but the type of banter which has
>been going on, in this string, to date, is not malicious (as far as I
>can see). Neither is it bigotted or secterian, in the way the files of
>two particular scotish teams were. I'm not racist ! (as certain people
>seem to think). If you would just calm down a little and take the notes in
>the light hearted manner in which they are intended and join in with
>some of the *friendly* banter you may enjoy it.
If all you want to do is 'banter' with each other, you can use
electronic mail, and not let everyone else in on it. Also, one thing I
(I'm British) have learnt from working in France is that language can be
easily misunderstood! So, light-hearted conversations in English could
well be misinterpreted by a person for whom English is not a 'fluent'
language.
Reagrds,
Ian
|
129.641 | The game is on Saturday!!!!! | KBOMFG::TANNER | Californian Girls are more fun!!!!! | Wed Jun 16 1993 12:45 | 7 |
|
The game is on saturday, Iam not sure about the kickoff time I just know their
playing in the indoor stadium in Detroit. There's also a lot of hype going on
about the grass in the stadium, which they have been experimenting on for six
months. I juts hope we see alot of goals to keep up the interest in the states.
-dave-
|
129.642 | There's a chance ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Wed Jun 16 1993 13:31 | 14 |
|
The one thing you guys will want to watch is Klinsman taking dives like
Greg Luganis all over the place. With the timing of Des Walkers
tackling lately there will ample opportunity.
The other guy to watch is obviously Riedler. Either Palister man-marks
him or he's sure to knock a few in. That guy has some powerful header !
Have to admit as has been said before, the German defence is brutal so
you might be in with a chance if the England defence plays the way it
did against Brazil. Having said that, if Wright is off form, again, the
outlook looks bleak.
Peter(An Impartial Celt)
|
129.643 | reasons to be cheerful.. | DBOT07::RUSSELL | WEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93 | Wed Jun 16 1993 13:57 | 24 |
| Hi Guys...just woke up...both twins acting the goat last night...didnt
get much sleep etc etc...
For those who aint Irish, let me explain. Tadhg is Irish for Tim...my
Dads name. I have been called "Tiger" since I was a kid...its
handier I guess...even now, when I'm introduced to new people, they
start calling me *Tiger* after a few hours.
I take it as a compliment. I do wash regularly and dont eat fresh
Wildebeest for breakfast. To my friends, my twins, a boy and a girl,
are collectively called.."Tiger-Cubs"...it goes on and on...the only
person who dont call me "Tiger" is my wife...and is this is a public
conference, I cant write down the name she most often calls me.
Like Dom, I think that "Football" involves a lot more than just the
game on the field. "Football" involves all the witty banter of the
terraces and the pubs, the press and TV reports. It was in that light
that we wrote such meisterpieces (ahem!) as we did.
Personally, I cant envision Bob Palmer reading 129 or 130, but if he
does, he is welcome. This conference grants us all a ray of sunshine in
an increasingly difficult place to work.
*Tiger*
|
129.644 | He's a gooner. | ESSB2::SDUFFY | | Wed Jun 16 1993 14:40 | 17 |
| re .643
>> Personally, I cant envision Bob Palmer reading 129 or 130....
Taken from the football archives, vintage 1971, proof that Bob is a gooner ?
================================================================================
Note 12.243 Arsenal F.C. 243 of 420
FLARES::PALMERB "Purple haze, always in my brain" 5 lines 16-JUN-1971 12:07
-< Dig those groovy side burns man >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow man, where can I buy a pair of sideburns like Charlie George,
they're sooooo out of this world.
B.P.
er, only kidding Bob really.
|
129.645 | he he | DBOT07::RUSSELL | WEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93 | Wed Jun 16 1993 15:55 | 6 |
| re -1 ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ....8^))))))))...really good that one..
I dunno about him being a Gooner, but he's certainly given enough
people the bullet....
*Tiger*
|
129.646 | Toulon U-21 result. | ESSB::PLYNCH | | Wed Jun 16 1993 18:49 | 4 |
| RE: 610 & 611.
France 0 - 1 England (Flitcroft)
|
129.647 | | GALVIA::SPAIN | Taylor must STAY | Fri Jun 18 1993 17:29 | 18 |
|
Re .633, It was a good note but I must take issue with some of the
comments re moderators.
We do not wait for somebody to complain. I'm sick of setting notes
hidden. Sure we miss some. sure there are inconcsistencies but this
is not our full time jobs. I try and snatch some time for notes
whenever I can. Many of the notes enteredt by JF, Dezzz and I are late
at night or on weekends. We just don't have time to read every note.
I've set some notes hidden only after hving them pointed out to me by
another noter.
This conference is for discussing football and not for insulting other
employees. Some oif the comments in here are way over the top. Most
of the English and Irish fans here are just interested in football.
Let's stick to discussing football.
Gary.
|
129.648 | | MACNAS::MATTHEWS | | Tue Jun 22 1993 20:25 | 7 |
| Re .643
Is Carlton Palmer any relation to Bob Palmer? If he is, then Bob may be
much more interested in this file than we all previously thought.
John.
|
129.649 | Bob who?? | KURMA::RBERNARD | I like ??? | Sat Jun 26 1993 04:21 | 5 |
|
RE. -1
Who is Bob Palmer.
|
129.650 | C'MON ENGLAND>>!!!! | SIOG::DLUGAG::RUSSELL | Wexford All-Ireland Champions '94 | Tue Sep 07 1993 16:53 | 13 |
| Hi,
I see there have been no entries in this note for yonks...I wonder why??
Anyway, just thought I'd let you know that England are playing Poland
tomorrow night at Wembley in a "vital, crucial" WC qualifier.
I'd like to take this opportunity to wish them well. USA '94 wouldnt be the
same without you.
luv,
*Tiger*
|
129.651 | Sh*t or bust... | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Tue Sep 07 1993 17:05 | 27 |
|
Oh well, its make or brake tomorrow night. England play Poland at
Wembley. England have to win, its as simple as that. Anything else and
we wont be taking part in the World Cup next year in the States. The
good news is Poland dont travel very well,and usually get beat at
Wembley, (Apart from the obvious one).
If we win, then we can go to Holland next month knowing we arent out of
it. What sort of performance can we expect tomorrow night ?, who knows
under Taylor. If we play like we played against Holland at Wembley we
will hammer Poland, but if we play like we played in most of the other
internationals under this fool, then anything could happen.
I'll be there, hoping to chear the lads (including Teddy) on to
Victory. If we do manage to qualify, we've got to put up with Taylor
for another few years yet, and his unbeliavably bad tactics and team
selections. I would rather that though than not be in the States next
year. In an Ideal world, we qualify, Taylor gets sacked and Terry
Venables takes over and takes us to Glory nexy July, but what is more
likely to happen is that we will scrape through on goal difference, go
to the States under Taylor, without a right back, and put up with him
bringing on defenders when we are 1-0 down to Zaire with ten minutes to
go.
Anyone know the team yet ?
Dave...
|
129.652 | | YUPPY::BUSH | Alive and Kicking | Tue Sep 07 1993 17:12 | 16 |
|
Caught most of the team just now on the radio
Seaman
??
Adams
Pallister
Pearce
Ince
Gascoigne
Sharpe
Platt
Ferdinand
Wright
Tony B.
|
129.653 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Tue Sep 07 1993 17:26 | 7 |
|
What no Teddy Sheringham...???
I paid 22 notes just to see Ready Steady Teddy spank the Poles, oh well
Ferdinand isnt a bad player.
Dave...
|
129.654 | | YUPPY::BUSH | Alive and Kicking | Tue Sep 07 1993 17:28 | 4 |
|
Rob Jones is the missing defender.
Tony B.
|
129.655 | I wouldn't be surprised | WOTVAX::GREENJA | Andy Green | Tue Sep 07 1993 17:29 | 2 |
|
Maybe he's the missing right back !
|
129.656 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | BLUE IS THE COLOUR | Tue Sep 07 1993 18:43 | 10 |
|
I have no doubts that England will whup the Poles at Wembley tomorrow
night. England are far to strong for this average Pole side, and
I expect to see at least 4 or 5 goals from England.
We dont have a bad side, thankfully injury has ruled out the worst
right back in the country Lee Dixon. How did such a crap player ever
get picked for England in the first place..
Andy..B
|
129.657 | | SUBURB::COMMIT | Commit Group | Tue Sep 07 1993 19:03 | 10 |
| RE BarefieldA
How did such a crap player ever get picked for England in the first place..
**Just look at Dennis Wise and that is real crap in an England shirt.
Baz
|
129.658 | Be happy if ye win 1-0 | KBOMFG::TANNER | U2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!! | Tue Sep 07 1993 19:16 | 11 |
|
Anything less than a win for England tomorrow could mean "C'est La Vie" The
Poles will more than likely play a defensive game and hope to grap a goal on
the counter attack.... As regards Mr Barefield claiming ye'll win by five goals
well all I can is that you wont find too many genuine English fans that would
agree with that nonsense. Replacing Walker with Adams is like replacing a
Camel with a Donkey.... The present form of Man Utds three players should be a
big help, as for the fat kid, well Iam not sure how he's done so far for Lazio,
I just know they haven't scored a goal in their first two games.....
-dave-
|
129.659 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | BLUE IS THE COLOUR | Tue Sep 07 1993 19:36 | 5 |
| I dont think that you cant argue with Dennis Wise's England performance,
one game one goal... It took Ian Wright 13 games to find the back of the
net.
Andy..B
|
129.660 | | SUBURB::COMMIT | Commit Group | Tue Sep 07 1993 19:41 | 7 |
| Yeah he did score and well done to him but it was handball and what
else did he do in that game.
Baz
|
129.661 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Tue Sep 07 1993 20:12 | 10 |
| <<< Note 129.660 by SUBURB::COMMIT "Commit Group" >>>
>> Yeah he did score and well done to him but it was handball and what
>> else did he do in that game.
So what, if the ref counts it it's a goal
|
129.662 | hand of God | ESSB::BREE | | Tue Sep 07 1993 20:54 | 5 |
| re:661
If you don't believe that ask Maradona.
Paul
|
129.663 | | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ | | Tue Sep 07 1993 21:42 | 12 |
| re .651:
> what is more likely to happen is that we will scrape through on
> goal difference, go to the States under Taylor, without a right
> back, and put up with him bringing on defenders when we are 1-0
> down to Zaire with ten minutes to go.
Zaire has been eliminated. In the unlikely event that the English
qualify, you will have to be content to watch them succomb 1-0 to
the Ivory Coast.
--Mr Topaz
|
129.664 | Please stick to football | BLKPUD::WATTERSONP | Can I speak to an adult ? | Wed Sep 08 1993 01:08 | 7 |
|
Yawn yawn...
You make Cunno sound interesting - can't you take your anti-English
remarks to a more relevant notesfile ?
Paul
|
129.665 | | FORTY2::ROBERTSON | Living with Flamingos on the DELTA | Wed Sep 08 1993 13:47 | 36 |
| On the Russ & Jonno Show this morning (Virgin 1215) They asked listeners to
phone in with advice for Graham Taylor. Although no classics, they should help
brighten up a dull day ( so far )
Try and score more goals than Poland...
Emigrate to Peru and spend the rest of your life as a llama...
Put in 2 goalkeepers and hope the Poles don't notice...
Some guy dictated a letter of resignation
But my favourite came from a Scotts guy..
Call Andy Roxburgh..... He's been getting away with it for years
Best of luck to all teams in the British Isles today
re .658
>Replacing Walker with Adams is like replacing a Camel with a Donkey....
After Walker's last few games for England, I would say it's like replacing a
snail with a Donkey. It was after all Walker's slowness of thought, and total
lack of positional awareness during the Norway game that actually led to the
goals. I'm not saying he was the sole culprit, but more is expected of him.
Maybe being dropped will make him realise that he too has to earn the right to
wear the England shirt. As for Adams, his form has gone in the other direction.
I for one actually feel he is improving (I don't believe I just wrote that), and
his recent performances for England show that.
Defence tonight is the key. If it plays as a unit, then England should win. The
midfield is strong, and, although not at international level yet, the front
men's record speaks for itself.
Al
|
129.666 | 3-1 to England, (I hope) | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Wed Sep 08 1993 14:11 | 11 |
| So long as there is no repeat of the Poland game at wembley 'x' years
ago that stopped us from qualifying, what with the nightmare scrambles
for a goal etc, my brother who was 9 at the time went to his room and
cried his eyes out for 2 hours at the end of the game.
He probably doesn't give a damn these days, but I know I'll be mighty
pissed-off if England dont win.
The consolation if we lose is that Taylor will have to go.
-Dom
|
129.667 | Do Holland or Norway play tonight????? | KBOMFG::TANNER | U2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!! | Wed Sep 08 1993 14:27 | 0 |
129.668 | | ECCGY4::HAIGH | If voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it. | Wed Sep 08 1993 14:45 | 1 |
| No.
|
129.669 | Did I say that...? | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Wed Sep 08 1993 17:30 | 17 |
|
O.K this is totally out of character but,
This is difficult for me to say but,
I wish the English the best of luck tonight !
(They need it)
After seeing the type of goal Mr. Wright is capable of scoring
(i.e Arse v Toffs) it would be a shame if he didn't get to play
in the U.S.
If only he could do it for Engerland. Ahh sigh !
Still think you should sack Taylor !
Peter (An Impartial Celt)
|
129.670 | | YUPPY::BUSH | Alive and Kicking | Wed Sep 08 1993 18:05 | 4 |
|
Subs announced as:
Woods, Walker, Clough, Sinton, Sherringham.
|
129.671 | Need time... | VMSSG::FUERTES | | Wed Sep 08 1993 18:29 | 6 |
| What time is kickoff?
I want to set the satellite and vcr here in the USA but I need the
time.
Carlos
|
129.672 | 15 mins to go | WOTVAX::MACDONALDI | Stalybridge Celtic | Wed Sep 08 1993 18:33 | 6 |
|
kick off time is 2.45pm UK time.
mac
|
129.673 | re -.1 Wrong game | FORTY2::ROBERTSON | Living with Flamingos on the DELTA | Wed Sep 08 1993 18:35 | 3 |
| The Ireland game starts in 15 mins, the England game starts at 8pm BST I think
Al
|
129.674 | 1 - 0 | WOTVAX::MACDONALDI | Stalybridge Celtic | Wed Sep 08 1993 18:52 | 5 |
|
Rep of Ire 1 (aldridge) Lithuania 0
|
129.675 | Wrong note | FORTY2::ROBERTSON | Living with Flamingos on the DELTA | Wed Sep 08 1993 19:03 | 5 |
| Mac, Ireland are in Group 3, that's note 130.
This is the group with England, Holland, Norway, Poland et al.
Al
|
129.676 | The mans a clown | MIACT::CLARKSON | | Wed Sep 08 1993 21:27 | 8 |
| I too was 'gutted' when England lost to the clown et al and remember
Kevin Hector coming on and nearly scoring with his first touch almost
as if it was yesterday.
Taylor's legacy (particularly from the totally gutless, anonymous and
inept performances against Norway and USA) is that hardly anyone cares
about tonight any more. He did well at Watford and Villa but has blown
his England credibility completely - he has to go!
|
129.677 | | BUSSTP::DREES | | Thu Sep 09 1993 01:13 | 2 |
|
England 3 up....still 30 mins to go
|
129.678 | here we go again | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | U.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there! | Thu Sep 09 1993 01:17 | 6 |
| Oh dear this means we'll get all that "england greatest team in world"
stuff in the morning
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
129.679 | result | BUSSTP::DREES | | Thu Sep 09 1993 01:51 | 2 |
|
England 3 Poland 0
|
129.680 | Match Report Anyone? | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Thu Sep 09 1993 14:15 | 1 |
|
|
129.681 | Good night.. | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Sep 09 1993 14:19 | 23 |
|
Good result, great atmosphere and good performance.
Having been gulity nof getting carried away before, feet firmly on the
ground now, as with Graham Taylor in charge anything is still possible,
but lets just say he got it right for this one. (but why cant they play
like that all the time ????)
One upafter 5 minutes, you could feel an early goal, the atmoshere was
pretty intense, all the England team seem fired up, exspecially Gazza.
Ferdinand onto a through ball, to slot it passesd the keeper. Good
finish. Poland came into more a the half went on, and were starting
to look dangerous towards the end of the first half.
In the second half, Gascoigne came back to life, after seeming totally
out of it at the end of the first half. He scored from a Ferdinand
flick to make it 2-0. Pearce rounded of a good night with a curling
freekick.
Probably the best performance under Taylor, but it needs to be repeated
next month in Holland. At least we are back in with a chance now.
Dave...
|
129.682 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | BLUE IS THE COLOUR | Thu Sep 09 1993 14:37 | 13 |
|
Great result for England last night, were back on the road to recovery
and and our way to the world cup finals 1994. What a brilliant
performance from our brave lads, and you cant argue with the quality
goals..
I now have realised that Graham Taylor is the right man for England,
after doubting him for so long..
We proved last night that we are still one of the best teams in the
world.. What do you think mr Wicks..?
Andy..B
|
129.683 | lies, damn lies and.... | FORTY2::ETHERIDGE | The bottles are all empty... | Thu Sep 09 1993 14:47 | 3 |
| updated table please someone?
Ian
|
129.684 | A win at last | FORTY2::ROBERTSON | Living with Flamingos on the DELTA | Thu Sep 09 1993 15:24 | 55 |
| P W D L F A Pts
Norway..... 7 5 2 0 20 3 12
England.... 8 4 3 1 19 6 11
Holland.... 7 3 3 1 17 8 9
Poland..... 6 3 2 1 8 6 8
Turkey..... 8 1 1 6 7 17 3
San Marino. 8 0 1 7 1 32 1
Remaining Matches:
Sept 22: San Marino v Holland
Norway v Poland
Oct 13: Holland v England
Poland v Norway
Oct 27: Turkey v Poland
Nov 10: Turkey v Norway
Nov 16: San Marino v England
Nov 17: Poland v Holland
Good sprited performance last night.
Great start with the first of 3 great goals coming after just 5 minutes.
Ferdinand goes through 2 defenders, and picks up a diagonal pass from Platt in
his stride, and smashes it past the keeper.
The keeper then started making some great saves, esp Wright & Gascoigne.
Half time 1 - 0
The second half started as the first
7 minutes into the half a cross come in from the right ( Jones??) Ferdinand rise
high above the defence, knocks the ball to Gazza who takes one touch then slots
it home.
The third came soon after. A free kick from 25 yards, and that man Stuart Pearce
did the biz.
Everyone played their socks off, and the only player who could feel down was
Wright who should have broken his Wembley duck for England. Adams, who totally
justified his place, hassled a Pole defender just outside the Polish box, robs
him, then sends a perfect cross to Wright, who tried to delicately lob the
keeper ( on the 6 yard box ), but sliced horribly. Should have smashed low and
hard to either side of the keeper.
One member of the squad who definitely won't be going to Holland is Gazza who
picked up his 2nd yellow card. Other yellows went to Adams & Jones.
Al
|
129.685 | It's the next one that counts.... | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Thu Sep 09 1993 15:46 | 7 |
| That's bad news if there is no Gazza for the Holland game, as he's
the player they most fear.
Norway are due some bad luck, and should stumble in one of the
remaining games.....but Holland's the real problem.
-Dom
|
129.686 | Cmon Norway... | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Thu Sep 09 1993 15:59 | 6 |
|
> Norway are due some bad luck....
Any bad luck for Norway = disaster for England
Ned
|
129.687 | howdja figure? | ESSB::BREE | | Thu Sep 09 1993 16:03 | 3 |
| How do you make out that a problem for Norway is bad for England?
Paul
|
129.688 | | ECCGY4::HAIGH | If voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it. | Thu Sep 09 1993 16:24 | 3 |
|
Because Norway all almost certainly going to qualify, that leaves
one place for England, Holland and Poland to fight for.
|
129.689 | Simple...NOT | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Thu Sep 09 1993 16:34 | 11 |
| re .687
cos there are two qual places and there's no point in wanting a team
who are ahead of you on points, with a game in hand, and a better
GD to get beat off a team that can pass you (ie Poland) even if you
win your last two games.
I know there are numerous permutations but defeat or defeats for Norway
just make it more complicated, and therefore uncertain.
Ned
|
129.690 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Sep 09 1993 16:37 | 14 |
|
The situation for England is easy....win both the remaining games and
we will qualify. On last nights performance we can go to Holland in
confident mood, but the problem is having two performances like last
nights in a row, its unheard of under Graham Taylor.
A draw in Holland and a win in Sam marino should do us.
The situation is alot better than it was at the same time yesterday,
although we are still by no means certain to qualify and only a
performance on a par with last nights will enable us to get any sort of
result in Holland.
Dave...
|
129.691 | Crunch game in Rotterdam | GALVIA::SPAIN | signed long gary(); | Thu Sep 09 1993 16:49 | 7 |
|
A draw in Holland will almost certainly do England. Anyway England
will have a better idea of exactly what is needed by October 13th.
England played very well last night. It will be some game in
Rotterdam. I assume it's live on tv but will it be on Sky or BBC/ITV?
Gary.
|
129.692 | holland-england 2-1 | HLMB01::RICHARD | | Thu Sep 09 1993 17:18 | 9 |
| Guys,
no predictions yet its all to close at the moment does anybody know
what happens if the teams are equal on points at the end of all the
matches, i suppose goal difference first but after that??? As stated
before the cruncher will be holland-england the team that loses that
encounter is definitely out and yes England will miss Gazza...
Richard.
|
129.693 | Fair Play..well done | SIOG::DLUGAG::RUSSELL | Wexford All-Ireland Champions '94 | Thu Sep 09 1993 17:23 | 21 |
| re - 1
Gary, I dont care whether its on BBC or SKy SPorts...ya see I won a satellite
system last May, and acquired a Sky SPorts card last weekend....8^)
Anyway, England played really well, they were fantastically determined and
put in the most solid performance since Adam was knee high to a grasshopper.
Poland were a poor shadow of the team that over-ran England last May.
I dont think they'll miss Gazza in Holland. He's a superfluous player. They
will need hard men in Holland to defend in depth and break away to strike the
goal that matters. However, regardless of commitment, England lack the
tactical cuteness to win in Holland.
Its just a shame that one of Holland/England wont qualify. Being Objective
about it, my money is on Holland.
Good Luck,
*Tiger*
|
129.694 | The real work has yet to be done... | GYMAC::DCASSIDY | | Thu Sep 09 1993 17:55 | 9 |
|
England invariably play better when the opposition is of a higher
standard. They should get a result in Holland. Rumours have it that
Bergkamp is not at his peak YET. He , with Gascoigne out, will be the
key to the game. Contain him and England will get the point they need.
Anything more will most defintely be a bonus for them.
Dezzz.
|
129.695 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Until DEC doth us part! | Thu Sep 09 1993 18:07 | 10 |
|
>I dont think they'll miss Gazza in Holland. He's a superfluous player.
^^^^^^^^^^^
That's not how you spell superlative.
Tim
PS that was a joke before you all get all unneccessarily anti-English
on me ;-)
|
129.696 | The new John Barnes ? | WOTVAX::GREENJA | Andy Green | Thu Sep 09 1993 18:26 | 8 |
|
Good England performance last night, GT's team selection totally
vindicated but ....
Why doesn't he pick Ian Wright the goal scorer from Arsenal
instead of Ian Wright the pop singer ?
Or was it just bad luck ?
|
129.697 | | GALVIA::SPAIN | signed long gary(); | Thu Sep 09 1993 21:47 | 20 |
|
Okay here's how I see this group
Norway need 3 points from Poland H & A and Turkey A. This should be
well within their compass.
England need a minimum of a draw in Holland and a victory over San
Marino. This may still not be enough but it probably will be.
Holland need to beat England and San Marino and then draw in Poland,
A draw v England and victory in Poland would suffice if San Marino were
hammered.
Poland need 3 points from Norway and 4 from Turkey A and Holland H.
This scenario would also knock out England.
I think Norway are too good for Poland. England should take a point in
Holland and shade it on goal difference.
Gary.
|
129.698 | | TRUCKS::SANT | so near yet sofa... | Thu Sep 09 1993 21:58 | 22 |
|
Good summary Gary.
I don't think Poland will get much away in Norway, though are
likely to be tough opposition at home against Holland (I'm
assuming that Turkey and San Marino will be rolled over by
Poland/Norway/Holland/England now they have no chance).
If England draw in Holland then they should get to USA. However,
it all comes down to timing of the games imo...we've often
seen Poland completing the bulk of their schedule later than other
sides in their group, so if they're still in with a chance then
Holland will find it tough in Poland.
Poland's next game, against Norway, is key.
I think we're favourites for the second place now, provided we
get at least a draw in Holland, cause Poland and Holland will
cancel each other out and Norway still need a win to be sure,
which they will probably take from Poland.
Andy.
|
129.699 | The Holland Game | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Fri Sep 10 1993 10:21 | 3 |
| OK, Pick your 11 best defenders here.....
-Dom :-)
|
129.700 | Up the Republic (Eire to qualify with ease !!) | KURMA::JJACK | | Fri Sep 10 1993 16:01 | 10 |
|
It was interesting to read in this mornings press, that the general
public, media & footballing authorities in the USA DO NOT want
Un-ger-land to qualify for the World Cup.
This is basically put down to the English fans....& I quote "Loutish"
behaviour. They (the people mentioned above) think it would be more
trouble than it's worth to have England qualify, due to the security
headaches/costs that their cretinous majority of fans would cause.
|
129.701 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Fri Sep 10 1993 16:10 | 8 |
|
Does that also mean they dont want the German's and Dutch to Qualify
aswell...???
I seroiulsy doubt that America with all the problems with crime in that
country is worried about 100 drunk Englishmen singing about WWII.
Dave...
|
129.702 | More fans = More damage = more bad publicity | KURMA::JJACK | | Fri Sep 10 1993 16:17 | 8 |
|
Dave
I cannot comment on the feelings regarding the Dutch, Germans etc....
Only on what was reported in the press.
Me finx the figure would be nearer 1500 to 2000....and that tends to
make a difference when it comes to smashing up bars etc..........
|
129.703 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Fri Sep 10 1993 16:24 | 16 |
|
>> Me finx the figure would be nearer 1500 to 2000....that tends to
>> make a difference when it comes to smashing up bars etc..........
Err...you've been away with England and seen it yourself have you, or
are you just going by what you read in the paper...?
Dont beleive the hype. Dont get me wrong, I'm not saying that England
are not deserved of there reputation, but there's nothing like a good
old media reation, and alot of the time, thats what you get.
Unfortunatley if you are in a foreign country supporting England,
everyone thinks you are a hooligan anyway, which we have ourselves to
blame for, I know, but 1500 to 2000 is a slight exageration.
Dave...
|
129.704 | | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | One o three and counting | Fri Sep 10 1993 16:32 | 9 |
|
Absolutely Dave. In comparison to the French/German/Dutch etc, the
English hooligan problem is virtually non existant these days. Policing
is at it's lowest for years & the fences are getting smaller and lower
and blunter.
Tony
|
129.705 | | FORTY2::ASH | Mail Interchange Group, Reading | Fri Sep 10 1993 16:37 | 10 |
| Can anyone remember when we last beat Holland? I recall a few draws and one
stunning defeat (88), but can't remember a win.
My fear is that if GT reckons a draw will be enough, he'll try and keep the
same team, but moving Platt forward to bring in Batty (or similar). Holland's
weakest area has to be their defence so I'd rather see a positive approach.
But, when did we ever guess what Taylor was going to do?!
grahame
|
129.706 | Re .704 | KBOMFG::TANNER | U2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!! | Fri Sep 10 1993 17:09 | 12 |
|
Tony I agree with you on the national scene that crowd trouble is at a low
in the English league which is great to hear. But ye still have a "big" bunch
of idiots that follow the national team and they don't care about footie their
there to get drunk and cause as much trouble as possible.
I wonder how the scene will be next month in Holland??!!!! I hope football
wins on that night and not hooliganism.. Ton have you any comments????
-dave-
|
129.707 | | ASABET::KNIPSTEIN | | Fri Sep 10 1993 17:14 | 13 |
| Re: .700
Where did this report come from. As a member of the "general public"
residing in the Boston area, I have not seen or heard of any such
massive feeling in regards to not wanting the English to qualify.
When this area hosted the England-USA match in June, there were no
problems at all with "Loutish" behaviour.
Based on what we've seen in the press lately, I would think people
would be much more concerned with the Columbian supporters - based on
their reaction to beating Argentina and qualifying for WC94.
Steve
|
129.708 | | BLKPUD::WATTERSONP | who me ? | Fri Sep 10 1993 17:24 | 13 |
|
re .700
What press did you see these reports in ?
It wouldn't be the Scottish press stirring up sh*t because Scotland
have failed to qualify ?
When I was in the States a few weeks back, all the people I spoke to
hardly knew what football was, never mind objected to England
qualifying because of our 'thugs'.
Paul
|
129.709 | Objective - sell papers not give news | ISIDRO::BREADIE | | Fri Sep 10 1993 17:27 | 11 |
|
Sky News quoted the Boston Globe as the source of the report. It would
be consistent, when I was in the states last August there was a full
one page article by some huy in the Boston Globe on why the should not
bring the WC to Boston. There were amazing statements about how people
die at MOST games and every game has wanton vandalism etc etc. It was
the most uniformed article I had seen.
Wonder what he will write when 30000 Irih people have a two week party
and piss up at Foxborough. I guess an apology would be out the
question.
|
129.710 | Lies, damn lies and BG articles | GALVIA::SPAIN | signed long gary(); | Fri Sep 10 1993 17:30 | 7 |
|
Having seen some of the total rubbish written in the Boston Globe that
article wouldn't surprise me.
Anyway England will be going to Orlando if they qualify.
Gary.
|
129.711 | Why JUST us? | MOEUR1::SMITH | | Fri Sep 10 1993 17:48 | 7 |
|
And while we're talking about it, when was the last time an England
'crowd' killed the ref. aka the South Americans...
I agree that the English fans have been misbehaved in the past, but,
there are many, many WORSE sets of fans around the World, so why pick
on ONLY England?
|
129.712 | The New York Sun perhaps. | YELBUS::DSMITH | Gazza's my hero...NOT!!!!! | Fri Sep 10 1993 17:48 | 23 |
|
Nothing to do with the Scottish press stirring up sh*t.
The article was in the New York Daily News by columnist Michael Lewis.
"Much to the chagrin of the World Cup USA 1994 officials, England is
again alive and kicking. The English, notorious for their rowdy and
obnoxious fans, dominated Poland.
No one will admit it publicly but Cup officials would love England
and its fans to stay at home next year. It would save a lot of
headaches and a huge amount of money on additional security."
Maybe this paper is the equivalent of some of the tackier rags we get
over here.
No matter what countries qualify, there will always be some idiots
hell-bent on causing trouble after having a couple of sodas too many.
Admittedly, some have a worse reputation than others!
Danny.
|
129.713 | trained by the Sun! | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | U.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there! | Fri Sep 10 1993 20:45 | 17 |
| The daily news is or was owned by Rupert Murdoch - need I say more.
The Boston globe has published a number of anti-english articles as was
mentioned in a number of earlier replies and it seems that they will
continue this - note their reports on the riots in Chicago after
the Bulls won the NBA whilst being very low-key and less than
sensational did compare them to "english soccer games"
Of the 3 big east-coast cities i've only found the Washington Post so
far that gives football a decenent and fair coverage.
...and as Gary said if England qualify they will be in Orlando so it
doiesn't seem anyone elses business anyway.
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
129.714 | | BUSSTP::DREES | | Fri Sep 10 1993 22:04 | 10 |
|
re. 705
This snippet of info was in todays paper....
England have only beaten Holland once in 7 meetings in the last
23 years and not on Dutch soil since 1969.
Del.
|
129.715 | Dutch are worst on own soil ! | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Mon Sep 13 1993 13:54 | 1 |
| re-1 So this could be changed, next month !
|
129.716 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | BLUE IS THE COLOUR | Mon Sep 13 1993 15:54 | 4 |
|
Well if we dont beat them on the pitch were bound to 'DO em' outside!!!
|
129.717 | | ECCGY4::HAIGH | If voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it. | Tue Sep 14 1993 14:03 | 10 |
|
Re .last , that was a funny note.
England do have a problem with the National team fans, even though
at club level the situation is MUCH better now. Did you see some of the
'people' interviewed after the win against Poland?
Back to football, surely Clough is the obvious replacement for
Gascoigne for the Holland game?
|
129.718 | Potential hooligans? | PAVONE::TURNER | | Tue Sep 14 1993 14:09 | 9 |
| re: .717
>England do have a problem with the National team fans, even though
>at club level the situation is MUCH better now. Did you see some of the
>'people' interviewed after the win against Poland?
No, I didn't. Just out of interest, what did they have to say?
Dom
|
129.719 | Warning; Major generalisation in this note. | ECCGY4::HAIGH | If voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it. | Tue Sep 14 1993 14:54 | 5 |
|
The obligatory fist waving, "we are the greatest", "class showed
through" quoting, suspect looking charachters. The sort of people you
would throw Neil Ruddock at.
|
129.720 | Re- Nigel Clough | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Tue Sep 14 1993 16:59 | 16 |
|
Re- Clough
No way....he was given his chance on the US tour in the Summer, and
despite the results, it was a chance for certain players to show what
they have got, (eg Pallister). Clough flopped totally. He isnt in even
a half fit Gascoignes class. I would forget trying to replace Gascoigne,
as we havent got anyone, and just play a right sided midfield player.
Either Merson or Sinton, with Platt and Ince in the middle and Sharpe
on the left.
Dave...
|
129.721 | Holland have their own problems... | PAVONE::TURNER | | Tue Sep 14 1993 17:00 | 32 |
| Oh well, I was expecting something a bit more sinister, i.e. threats of
violence.
At worst, you could criticise these people for being unrealistic, but you
hear those sort of reactions from most supporters when they've won 3-0. A
case in point: the Danish supporters at the '86 World Cup (and afterwards)
with red-and-white painted faces who never stopped chanting: "We are
red, we are white, we are Danish dynamite!". That is, until they were
thrashed 5-1 by Spain.
On a different note, it would appear that the Dutch have at least as
many problems as Turnip and co:
Van Basten - injured (and unavailable)
Gullit - no longer wishes to be considered while Advocaat is manager
and has strongly criticised the team's cautious style of play
Roy - is finally starting to produce the goods in Italy, but has been
dropped from the squad by Advocaat who considers him to be too
"lily-livered" (or whatever the Dutch equivalent is!) for
international football
Vink - can't get a place in the Genoa team
Bergkamp/Jonk - both dropped from the Inter team at the weekend, and
the Dutch press are livid! (Bergkamp's exclusion was a little bit of a
mystery, but Jonk is seriously out of form).
Feast your eyes on that little lot!
Dom
|
129.722 | WISE "SIMPLY THE BEST" | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | BLUE IS THE COLOUR | Tue Sep 14 1993 17:29 | 7 |
|
I still think that Dennis Wise should play in place of Gazza, you
cant complain about his goal per game ratio.. Wise has proved himself
once and I'm sure he'll do it again if given the chance. I cant believe
the likes of Wright, Ince, Walker, Ferdinand and Paul Parker have been
picked ahead of Dennis Wise.
|
129.723 | | PAVONE::TURNER | | Tue Sep 14 1993 17:42 | 15 |
|
>I still think that Dennis Wise should play in place of Gazza, you
>cant complain about his goal per game ratio.. Wise has proved himself
>once and I'm sure he'll do it again if given the chance. I cant believe
>the likes of Wright, Ince, Walker, Ferdinand and Paul Parker have been
>picked ahead of Dennis Wise.
I presume this is a joke (not that I have any particular objections to
Dennis Wise) or are we to presume that in other times you'd have added John
Barnes, John Fashanu, Viv Anderson, Mark Chamberlain, Andy Gray and Luther
Blissett (to name but a few) to this little lot?
Or was it sheer coincidence? Or have I taken the bait?
Dom
|
129.724 | Spurs fans never forget Waddle. | CHEFS::HARRISR | Goosenargh! | Tue Sep 14 1993 17:44 | 8 |
| Going back to Nigel Clough. The man is just to slow. If the match was
played in an area, say the size of Birmingham, he may just get enought
space to time one of his famous passes, but probably will still get the
ball pinched off of his feet. If Taylor wants a playmaker, then why not
bring in Waddle, and for once, play him in position ?
Rich H
|
129.725 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | BLUE IS THE COLOUR | Tue Sep 14 1993 17:51 | 3 |
| RE.723
I'm no racist!!!!! I like English people :-)
|
129.726 | Dennis, Why ? | WOTVAX::GREENJA | Andy Green | Tue Sep 14 1993 18:01 | 8 |
| re .722
I couldn't find a footballing reason for your choice of men who should
stand down for Dennis Wise.
Can Dennis really do a good job in any position or are you implying
that Dennis Wise would be selected if he had a better suntan ?
|
129.727 | oops. | WOTVAX::GREENJA | Andy Green | Tue Sep 14 1993 18:03 | 2 |
|
I went for lunch mid-note, sorry for the repitition.
|
129.728 | Hoddle to take Gazza's role! | SHAWB1::STOCKMANS | | Tue Sep 14 1993 18:29 | 12 |
| How about Glen Hoddle replacing Gazza!
Gazza's not exactly got the most pace in the world.
They both play the same type of game as well.
John Giles in The Express thinks he'd be the perfect replacement.
Me thinks he'd be good for the best part of the game.
Only the pace of the game would be a problem for Glen, or would it?
I'm sure Holland won't be in a hurry to knock the ball about.
Si
|
129.729 | Hoddle the Magnificent | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Come the glorious day | Tue Sep 14 1993 19:11 | 6 |
| He'd get my vote. After all, he's still only 35 (I think) and even if he were 45
he'd still be the best player in England by a street.
Why not make him Captain?
Mike
|
129.730 | Seconder. | ESSB::PHAYDEN | It's not how long it takes but how well you do it... | Tue Sep 14 1993 19:14 | 6 |
|
re:last
Yep ! I second that one Mike.
Peter(An Impartial Celt)
|
129.731 | Toooooooooooooo Slllllllloooooooooooowwwwwww | CHEFS::HARRISR | Goosenargh! | Tue Sep 14 1993 20:07 | 6 |
| On his day Hoddle was the best player in the world, but not now. Could
the team afford to protect Hoddle's lack of pace, and susceptibility to
be a little hopeful with some of his passes, when playing from the
back. If Hoddle is in rthe team, then he should be manager.
Rich H
|
129.732 | Still a month to go though! | PAVONE::TURNER | | Tue Sep 14 1993 20:23 | 18 |
|
Much as I rate them, I think it's highly unlikely that Taylor will
plump for either Hoddle or Waddle for such an important game. They're
not the easiest of players to fit into a team setup and they'd need time
to mould an understanding with the other players, and the last thing
England would want in Amsterdam would be to have to carry a passenger.
It's far more likely that he'll go for a safer but less spectacular
choice...Andy Sinton or Gary Parker maybe. I think Sharp, Wright, Ince
Ferdinand and Platt are all assured of the places; they're all
extremely quick which will keep the Dutch worried on the break.
Platt's good at finding the net in high pressure situations and against
quality opposition (he's scored against Germany, Brazil, Argentina, Holland,
Belgium, Italy and USSR!). Likewise, Ferdinand worried the Dutch sick
at Wembley; how he didn't manage to score I shall never know.
Dom
|
129.733 | Not such a silly idea, honest | PLUNDR::MORAN | Waist not, want not! | Tue Sep 14 1993 20:31 | 7 |
|
Personally, I would pick Robert Lee of Newcastle to play on the right
and place Platt back in the middle.
But then again, I would wouldn't I?
Tim
|
129.734 | | SHAWB1::STOCKMANS | | Tue Sep 14 1993 21:30 | 4 |
| re -1
yep you would.
|
129.735 | | SHIPS::EDWARDS_D | | Wed Sep 15 1993 13:18 | 4 |
| Brian Robson seems the obvious choice to me. Big-match experience,
links well with Ince and Sharpe and he'll get stuck in. I'm not saying
he should be a regular international, but for games like this he is
ideal.
|
129.736 | Roll out the wrinklies | CHEFS::HARRISR | GOOSENARGH | Wed Sep 15 1993 13:52 | 7 |
| Why not Sir Stanley Matthews, in his day that man could play, OK so
he's not as quick as he used to be, but what an ideal replacement for
Gazza. Bobby Charlton I believe is available too. The midfield should
be plugged with someone like Carlton Palmer, allowing Platt to lurk
behind the front two. That would frighten the Dutch a little.
Rich H.
|
129.737 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Thu Sep 16 1993 12:03 | 41 |
| <<< Note 129.721 by PAVONE::TURNER >>>
-< Holland have their own problems... >-
>>On a different note, it would appear that the Dutch have at least as
>>many problems as Turnip and co:
>>Van Basten - injured (and unavailable)
He's already out for so long you can't realy say we miss him, it would be
nice to have him but he hasn't score for the national teams in ages so...
>>Gullit - no longer wishes to be considered while Advocaat is manager
>>and has strongly criticised the team's cautious style of play
Supurb player but can't keep paste with the game Holland play.
>>Roy - is finally starting to produce the goods in Italy, but has been
>>dropped from the squad by Advocaat who considers him to be too
>>"lily-livered" (or whatever the Dutch equivalent is!) for
>>international football
Has been dropped from the team after the EC in Sweden last year, can't
really say we miss him with the likes of Overmars and van Vossen in the
team.
>>Vink - can't get a place in the Genoa team
I don't see this as a problem as Vink rarely plays for Holland
>>Bergkamp/Jonk - both dropped from the Inter team at the weekend, and
>>the Dutch press are livid! (Bergkamp's exclusion was a little bit of a
>>mystery, but Jonk is seriously out of form).
I don't think they are out of form but the are just too attacking for
their Italian coach, Bergkamp scored three goals last night.
>>Dom
T_
|
129.738 | | ECCGY4::HAIGH | If voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it. | Thu Sep 16 1993 13:52 | 9 |
|
At the risk of inflaming the Hoddleites -
I always thought that what Barnes is now, Hoddle was before, great
player who seemed incapable of performing at international level.
I too, think that Waddle should be in the team, but it appears he
never will be again, which is why I suggested Clough.
|
129.739 | Consider me inflamed | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Come the glorious day | Thu Sep 16 1993 14:08 | 15 |
| Not quite true.
Barnes has been an automatic choice for England (when he's fit) simply because
of the goal he scored against Brazil in 1824. Glenn Hoddle on the other hand was
very impressive for England on the few occasions that he was picked.
In today's team he would stand out like a diamond in pig droppings. 8-)
Futhermore, Barnes is picked despite the fact that he hasn't even played well
for Liverpool for years, whereas Hoddle is playing superbly.
That said, he is a bit too old to be recalled into the England side. He'd still
be a better manager than Taylor though.
mike
|
129.740 | | ECCGY4::HAIGH | If voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it. | Thu Sep 16 1993 14:35 | 11 |
|
Hang on Mike,
Hoddle played around 40 games for England. The good performances
could be counted on one hand. I met a bloke who was assistant Physio
for the England team and he said Hoddle was just to nervous when he
played for England.
> He'd still be a better manager than Taylor though.
I think he'd be a good choice for manager.
|
129.741 | Hoddle=Genius.. | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Sep 16 1993 14:39 | 10 |
|
Hoddle never let England down, and was more often than not brilliant.
He wasnt picked for the simple reason that he cant tackle,and wouldnt
run up and down the pitch for 90 minutes.
Great player....
Dave...
|
129.742 | Hoddle=genius, part 2 | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Come the glorious day | Thu Sep 16 1993 15:02 | 13 |
| re:-2
Name a single player who has consistently lived up to his domestic reputation
for England since the 1980s. The truth is that our no-practice, no teamwork,
style national team doesn't help passing players. They all turn in sporadic
bursts of genius (Hoddle more than most) but are eventually dismissed as
disappointing. Compared to the international careers of Ian Wright, Paul
Gascoigne, John Barnes, and such like Hoddle was brilliant. Most people stand
amazed that he didn't get more games: 40 isn't many for a player of his stature.
He is, was, and always will be the best player to grace English football.
Mike
|
129.743 | consistency personified ;-) | WOTVAX::GREENJA | Andy Green | Thu Sep 16 1993 15:17 | 5 |
|
I'd like to nominate Geoff Thomas, every bit as good for England as I
ever thought he was in the league. He certainly never suffered through
lack of practice or teamwork.
|
129.744 | | ECCGY4::HAIGH | If voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it. | Thu Sep 16 1993 15:34 | 18 |
| > Name a single player who has consistently ....
I hate to say this but, Brian Robson - YES YES YES, he may not have
been as talented as Hoddle, but that's not what I'm sayaing. I wonder
if the old archived football notesfile is around to refresh our
memories about Glendas 'sparkling' international career.
> The truth is that our no-practice, no teamwork, style national team
> doesn't help passing players. They all turn in
> sporadic bursts of genius (Hoddle more than most) but are eventually
> dismissed as disappointing.
Agreed.
> He is, was, and always will be the best player to grace English football.
You are to Hoddle-o what Cunno is to Aldo. Shall we open a new note
for you? ;-)
|
129.745 | | YUPPY::MCCABE | Mike | Thu Sep 16 1993 15:41 | 18 |
| Talk about rose-tinted spectacles! Hoddle, actually won over 50 caps
for England and in the vast majority was a huge disappointment.
No doubt he was a very, very good English league player, but to describe
him, as someone did, as the best player in the World at a time when
Johann Cruyff, Michel Platini and Diego Maradona were playing is
ludicrous in the extreme.
And as for, "He is, was, and always will be the best player to grace
English football," sorry Mike, but this is more rose-tinted nonsense.
Did you never see a certain Mr Best play? In his prime, in my opinion,
he really WAS "the best player in the World".
Arguably, Hoddle has been the best Tottenham player of the past twenty
five years (some might say, not difficult :-)) although Ardiles might
argue about that, but best player etc. no way.
Mike M
|
129.746 | | YUPPY::BUSH | Alive and Kicking | Thu Sep 16 1993 22:47 | 8 |
|
Everyone seems to be talking of a central midfielder. To break down
the Dutch we will need 2 wider players such as Sharpe and Merson,
which leaves Platt and Ince in the middle.
Forget Hoddle and Clough. The other choice could have been Waddle
but that seems very unlikely.
Tony B.
|
129.747 | 'Bin' the pretty stuff for this one! | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Fri Sep 17 1993 12:55 | 7 |
| If a draw will be enough against the Dutch, and the Dutch need to win,
then the team that Taylor chooses must be a strong defensive one, with
a couple of forwards that can break away in a 'fast break' and score.
Basically we must do to Holland what Poland did to us in the '70s...
-Dom
|
129.748 | 76 % of all statistics is worthless | OSL09::BJARNE | Can you hear the drums in the wood ? | Tue Sep 21 1993 17:46 | 19 |
| Just one day to go, and then we'll beat Poland....
Who are we ? The Norwegian "Drillo's", still unbeaten in the qualifing
group 2.
4 matches has been played since Erik Thorstvedt had to pick
the ball out of the goal .... but, but, but .... look at these numbers:
1963: Poland - Norway 9 - 0.
1989: Norway - Poland 0 - 3.
Just statistics, forget it ! 76 % of all statistics is worthless !
Under the lead of Egil "Drillo" Olsen we have won 16 out of 30 matches !
(OK, that's also statistics, but nevertheless).
My guesses for tomorrow: Norway - Poland 1 - 1
San Marino - Holland 1 - 4
Bjarne
|
129.749 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Tue Sep 21 1993 19:02 | 15 |
|
>>My guesses for tomorrow: Norway - Poland 1 - 1
>> San Marino - Holland 1 - 4
>>
>>
>>Bjarne
Whot a joker, San MArino scoring against Holland? Wake up buddy!
You are also underestimating your own country 'cause they won't draw
1-1 and you know it!
T_
|
129.750 | Poland is out, or? | BCFI::SCHOTT | Mickey Mouse is a rat | Tue Sep 21 1993 22:34 | 8 |
|
Drop a point to Poland? AT HOME? No, no, no...
If only the famous spagetti-legs don't come over you, you will
beat their butts off the field. And that's it: USA prepare for
Norway!
Hermann
|
129.751 | Dutch line-up for tonight's game | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Wed Sep 22 1993 15:02 | 14 |
|
De Goeij
Koeman de Boer
Wouter Jonk Rijkaard
Bergkamp
Overmars Kieft Bosman Roy
|
129.752 | | OSL09::BJARNE | Can you hear the drums in the wood ? | Wed Sep 22 1993 16:29 | 56 |
129.753 | Results of 22nd Sep '93 | ZPOVC::KUMAR | | Thu Sep 23 1993 05:25 | 17 |
| From the BBC World Service ....
Norway 1
Poland 0
Thorsvedt got sent off as well. But Norway still won.
Holland 7
San Marino 0
Match played in Bologna.
Interesting results. Where does this leave England ?
Regards,
Kumar
|
129.754 | Hoping for a miracle | PLAYER::LESOIL | | Thu Sep 23 1993 11:29 | 7 |
|
Re.-1
>> Interesting results. Where does this leave England ?
Not far from the bottom end.
|
129.755 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Thu Sep 23 1993 11:58 | 17 |
| Dutch goalscorers last night
Bosman (Anderlecht) 3
Jonk (Inter) 2
Koeman (Barcelona) 1
R. de Boer (Ajax) 1
Very poor play by Kieft, Bergkamp and Roy.
I saw the match live on Dutch telly and Kieft was two times alone in front
of the goal and managed to get it over (just 1 meter away from the goalline)
or next to the goal. Bergkamp played like a sissy and was never in the game.
T_
|
129.756 | Status | OSLACT::HENRIKW | Riding the Nordic Territory | Thu Sep 23 1993 12:30 | 16 |
|
Norway 8 6 2 0 21-3 14
Netherlands 8 4 3 1 24-8 11
England 8 4 3 1 19-6 11
Poland 7 3 2 2 8-7 8
Turkey 8 1 1 6 7-17 3
San Marino 9 0 1 8 1-39 1
Remaining:
Oct 13: Netherlands vs England
Poland vs Norway
Oct 27: Turkey vs Poland
Nov 11: Turkey vs Norway
Nov 16: San Marino vs England
Nov 17: Poland vs Netherlands
|
129.757 | Brits abroad.... | ELIS::PEGG | | Thu Sep 23 1993 13:47 | 25 |
| Hello,
OK, I'm finally entering the fray. My name is Dave Pegg and I am in the
(un)enviable position of being an Englishman living in Holland.
I watched some of the match last night and must agree with Mijneer
Jansen's comments. It should have been 0-10. Thank God it wasn't!!
Dreadful game. No atmosphere. It sounded like there were more people
on the pitch than on the stands!
So, what happens now? I'm in a rather difficult situation as whatever
happens on Oct 13th will probably cause a divorce and loose me most of
my local friends. Yes you guessed it, my wife is Dutch!! Judging by the
current performances, my bet is a goaless draw. This keeps up England's
chances but knowing our luck, we'll only manage 1 or 2 against San
Marino and not qualify on goal difference.
Its all a real shame as this year is effectively the world cup for both
of our countries.
Until nearer the date......
Dave
|
129.758 | God must be Norwegian ! | OSL09::BJARNE | Can you hear the drums in the wood ? | Thu Sep 23 1993 14:59 | 27 |
129.759 | Date change | FORTY2::ASH | Mail Interchange Group, Reading | Thu Sep 23 1993 16:37 | 25 |
| > <<< Note 129.756 by OSLACT::HENRIKW "Riding the Nordic Territory" >>>
> -< Status >-
>
>
> Norway 8 6 2 0 21-3 14
> Netherlands 8 4 3 1 24-8 11
> England 8 4 3 1 19-6 11
> Poland 7 3 2 2 8-7 8
> Turkey 8 1 1 6 7-17 3
> San Marino 9 0 1 8 1-39 1
>
>Remaining:
> Oct 13: Netherlands vs England
> Poland vs Norway
> Oct 27: Turkey vs Poland
> Nov 11: Turkey vs Norway
> Nov 16: San Marino vs England
> Nov 17: Poland vs Netherlands
Those last two games are now being played on the same day (the 17th?).
England now have to either draw in the Netherlands and beat San Marino by 3
goals more than the Dutch beat Poland, or win on 13 October. No easy task.
g
|
129.760 | Congratulations Norway! | BCFI::PIHLSTROM | The bowsprit looks forward | Thu Sep 23 1993 17:47 | 17 |
|
See You in USA next year!
Norway (Sweden and Denmark) against the rest of the World -
What a fight!!!
\
\ /\
The Swedish Swagman :)_/____/ \_
\ \
/ \
/ /
_ _ _ _ _ /_
- - - - -
|
129.761 | Bergkamp Is he all there? | SIOG::MATTHEWS | | Fri Sep 24 1993 19:30 | 10 |
| Is Bergkamp overrated?? He appears to have done little in the
Holland-San Marino match. I watched the Inter-Lazio game on Channel 4
last week, and he did not appear to be the major influence in the Inter
team that we expected he would be..
Compared to the Lazio players, (Gasgoigne, Signori, etc) who were
marked just as tightly as he was, he looked pedestrian. Or maybe he is
being played out of position and cannot cope??
How much of an influence will he be in the England-Holland game?
|
129.762 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Fri Sep 24 1993 19:50 | 10 |
| rep -1
Bergkamp can produce very fine footy but he hasn't got any backbone so the
minute things don't work out for him he's gone.
He'll probably won't be seen for 89 minutes when Holland plays England next
month, but that one minute will be the score to 2-2
T_
|
129.763 | I hope it'll be to score 1-0!!!!!! | KBOMFG::TANNER | U2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!! | Fri Sep 24 1993 20:21 | 10 |
|
I saw the Lazio v Inter match on TV and the snickers kid was worse than
useless. The best foreigner was Thomas Doll by a mile.... Bergkampf had a much
better game than the bounty hunter!!!!!, he even got replaced during the second
half.
-dave-
|
129.764 | FIFA ranks Norway in a third position :-> | OSL09::BJARNE | Can you hear the drums in the wood ? | Mon Sep 27 1993 14:45 | 43 |
| RE: Note 129.760 from The Swedish Swagman
>> See You in USA next year!
>> Norway (Sweden and Denmark) against the rest of the World -
>> What a fight!!!
Sure I hope to see You there, thank you for your congratulations !!
FIFA now rates Norway as the Worlds third best football nation, after
Brazil and Italy..... :-) :-. :->
We was in the 9.th posistion a month ago. Since then, we have beaten:
Norway 1 - USA 0
Norway 1 - Poland 0
I saw these games, which makes me question the value of the FIFA ranking.
The ranking probably won't be used when the World Championship final
groups are put together. FIFA uses results from earlier championships for
seeding the teams (as far as I now).
Oh, sorry, we aren't there yet, just dreaming.... We'll have problems if
Bergkamp does what Jansen believes (and Norway loose in Poland):
RE: Note 129.762 from UTROP1::JANSEN
>> Bergkamp can produce very fine footy but he hasn't got any backbone so the
>> minute things don't work out for him he's gone.
>>
>> He'll probably won't be seen for 89 minutes when Holland plays England next
>> month, but that one minute will be the score to 2-2
I hope he miss that chance because 2-1 for England means that Norway
has qualified. 2-1 for Holland _also_ means that Norway has qualified....
My opinion: It's a pity that one of you have to miss the finals, I like
the Dutch style of football, and I have followed English
football the last 15 years.
Let the best team win ! (Or the second best - doesn't matter.
please don't draw !)
Oh, we'll qualify anyway (I think). Yes, I am sligthly nervous about
the next games...
Bjarne
|
129.765 | | HAMCL3::SCHARNBERG | zsunju | Mon Sep 27 1993 15:13 | 4 |
|
My heart is with the Norwegians (and the Greek).
Heiko
|
129.766 | Its the Finals that Count.... | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Tue Sep 28 1993 11:07 | 7 |
| No doubt Norway will win the qualifying group, but you can be sure
that just as in the past where teams have had good results in
qualifying when it comes to the Finals, they flop!
Both England or Holland would go further in the finals.....
-Dom
|
129.767 | | HAMCL3::SCHARNBERG | zsunju | Tue Sep 28 1993 12:53 | 5 |
| Yes, that's what we have seen before. Still I am always happy when
'underdog' teams make it to the finals. Norway will probably be seeded
in the category 'C' pot, which will not make their life easier.
Heiko
|
129.768 | quick question | GAOV10::MURPHY | | Wed Oct 06 1993 11:52 | 3 |
| What time is the Holland-England game kicking off at next wednesday??
Anthony..
|
129.769 | 8.00 or 8.15 | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Wed Oct 06 1993 13:10 | 3 |
| re -1 probably at 8.00 PM (our time is the same now, I guess..)
John
|
129.770 | | KERNEL::MCKEAVENEYJ | How's that....you're out | Wed Oct 06 1993 13:18 | 5 |
129.771 | US coverage on Prime/SportsChannel | PTOVAX::BIGLER | Art Bigler - Technical OEM Group - DTN-422-7873 @PTO | Wed Oct 06 1993 18:19 | 30 |
| For those of you in the United States, Prime/SportsChannel is covering
the England-Holland match live on October 13 starting at 2:00 PM
Eastern time. They also plan a same day repeat broadcast.
Prime/SportsChannel affiliates carrying the match are (according to
Soccer America):
- Prime Sports Midwest - Madison Square Garden
- Prime Sports Upper Midwest - Prime Ticket
- Prime Sports Intermountain West - Home Team Sports
- Prime Sports Rocky Mountain - Empire Sports Network
- Prime Sports Northwest - New England Sports Network
- KBL Sports Network - Pro Am Sports System
- Home Sports Entertainment - Sports Channel Chicago
- Sunshine Network - Sports Channel Pacific
- Sports South Network
I guess you know if one of these serves your area, KBL is here in
Pittsburgh and New England Sports Network is the biggie in most of
Massachusetts.
I also read in the Newcastle United note that Andy Cole may dress for
England. Dress? - he should start! Believe me, I saw England play
Germany in the US Cup in Detroit. Just his presence on the pitch would
require Holland to consider pulling back to cover his offensive
potential and perhaps open things up a bit. Please, somebody pick up the
telephone, ring Graham Taylor and explain this to him.
Art
|
129.772 | a reply to the previous note | CHEFS::HARRISR | GOOSENARGH | Wed Oct 06 1993 18:26 | 9 |
| Taylor would probably put Cole in defence! The problem with Taylor is
he is the England manager, and he shouldn't be. He has the tactical
awareness of a Lemming near a cliff top. He never seems to play his
players in the positions they fill for their clubs, and then slates
them. ( Chris Waddle for example ). Cole would be a good choice for
England, but like any attacker, he needs a supply of decent balls, and
unfortunately, he will not get them. This will knock his confidence for
six, rather like Ian Wrights.
|
129.773 | Englands Number 9 | WOTVAX::GREENJA | Andy Green | Wed Oct 06 1993 19:37 | 13 |
|
Worry not, Shearer is back.
If the supply is pitiful our Alan will go and take it off either defence,
I hope this will stop Ronald Koeman (sp?) from strolling forward and
making a nuisance of himself.
Always assuming that Taylor doesn't play Shearer at left back instead
of Sharpe ;-)
Have faith,
Andy
|
129.774 | Great news | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | U.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there! | Wed Oct 06 1993 20:18 | 14 |
| Re .771
Art - this is great news. By Wednesday we'll be sick of watching
non-stop baseball down here in Atlanta and watching a real sport
will be a nice break. I believe I will WFB (working-from-bar) on
wednesday watching Holland take on and beat
'the-greatest-team-in-the-world' (:==:)
IF soccer America list any other upcoming WC games on TV please post
them as a reply to note 112 (i think that's the number).
Regards,
Andrew.D.wicks
|
129.775 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Wed Oct 06 1993 21:45 | 31 |
| <<< Note 129.773 by WOTVAX::GREENJA "Andy Green" >>>
-< Englands Number 9 >-
>> Worry not, Shearer is back.
>>
>> If the supply is pitiful our Alan will go and take it off either defence,
>> I hope this will stop Ronald Koeman (sp?) from strolling forward and
>> making a nuisance of himself.
>>
>> Always assuming that Taylor doesn't play Shearer at left back instead
>> of Sharpe ;-)
>>
>> Have faith,
>>
>> Andy
Andy,
don't get ya hopes up as Ulrich van Gobbel will play in defence along with
Koeman, he's one of the fastes if not the fastes defender in the world, this
will make the way free for Koeman who isn't very fast (what an understatement).
I'll probably again will have a free ticket so I'll be there if things don't
go wrong.
I hope we will win but honestly I think it will again be a draw and no Holland
in the US of A.
T_
|
129.776 | England worries | PIECES::63585::PCDEFAULT | Place holder for NOTES | Thu Oct 07 1993 12:32 | 4 |
| Pearce, Wright and Ferdinand look dodgy to
play. Wright has a 50-50 chance.
Chris.
|
129.777 | Who is favourite ? | NEWOA::FIDO_T | Conation is the key | Thu Oct 07 1993 12:35 | 15 |
| >I hope we will win but honestly I think it will again be a draw and no Holland
>in the US of A.
I find the above interesting as it implies that you think Holland need
to win to qualify for USA ( i.e. a draw will be better for England
than Holland ). Is that the general impression in Holland ?
In UK, it is believed that England need to win to qualify, as they will
probably not be able to score enough goals in the last game ( 3 more
than Holland score against Poland ? ).
If both teams believe that a draw will not be sufficient, it should make
for an interesting match !
Terry
|
129.778 | C'mon England...please | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Thu Oct 07 1993 12:44 | 17 |
|
As a Newcastle (and England) supporter the Holland v England game
leaves me in a quandary...
I would *love* to see Andy Cole pull on the white shirt and terrorise
the orangemen, but I'm afraid, like previous noters, that he is just
*too* young and inexperienced, and it could knock him back years. He
is, however, without a doubt, *the* best striker in England today, and
could do it for England next week.
The worst part of all this is that *if* he doesn't play, and England
*if* lose then Newcastle will probably also lose their manager!
How can I win in this situation, as Wright is like a damp squib for
England, and Shearer is still somewhat untested????
Ned
|
129.779 | An English Centre Forward ! | WOTVAX::GREENJA | Andy Green | Thu Oct 07 1993 12:43 | 20 |
| RE: .775
Mr T,
Its a pity both Holland and England won't make it but I do hope your
fears are justified.
The point about Alan Shearer is not one about speed alone, there are a
number of centre halfs in the premier league who have been surprised by
the size of his shoulders.
It doesn't matter how fast Van Gobbel is if he's flat on his back ;-)
I think (hope!) this attitude, combined with excellent touch and shooting
ability might just disrupt the Dutch defence.
We shall see,
Cheers,
Andy
|
129.780 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Oct 07 1993 13:14 | 6 |
|
Ferdinand and Wright are both doubtfull....good.
Its a blessing in disguise, in comes Teddy to save the day.
Dave...
|
129.781 | a match made in heaven | CHEFS::HARRISR | Great things are afoot! | Thu Oct 07 1993 13:20 | 3 |
| Sheringham and Shearer up front could be deadly.
Rich.
|
129.782 | Dreamin' again... | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Thu Oct 07 1993 13:32 | 13 |
| re .781
>Sheringham and Shearer up front could be deadly
^^^^^^
Should that not read dead.....
I admire your confidence but I'm afraid that Sheringham would be about
as good as Wright in an England shirt.
Here's hoping I'm wrong!!!
Ned
|
129.783 | Do it my way | KERNEL::WITHALLG | Even Better Than The Real Thing | Thu Oct 07 1993 14:26 | 26 |
|
Scoring goals or not Ian Wright Wright Wright puts the shi**ers up
every defence. He as unpredictable as the English Weather.
Money couldn't buy him.
Didn't see many people saying "oh no not him" when he done the biz
against whoever he did the biz against in the WCQ's
Seaman
Dixon Pallister Adams Pearce
Gazza Ince Sharpe
Wright Ferdinand Shearer
Subs
Merson
Batty
Keown
Jones
Withall
Gazzer
|
129.784 | May the best win ! | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Thu Oct 07 1993 14:28 | 8 |
| For once I have to agree with Ton ; the general opinion here in Holland
that we have to win to be in the World Champions. We have to, but we
can't ; most players are injured or not in the right condition.
However, when the dutch team is in the situation as it now, they can do
strange....no, mysterious things. And could even win from an English
team.......For sure it will be a great game to watch !
John
|
129.785 | Gazzas twin brother or what!!!!!!!!!!! | KBOMFG::TANNER | U2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!! | Thu Oct 07 1993 15:45 | 22 |
|
Re .783 Gary I believe your star player "the fat kid" eat too many mars bars
during the previous games so they had to suspend him from this game!!
This could well be Englands advantage because they can now probably
play as an eleven man team without allways looking out for the kid.
Re .784 John you also have to remember your playing England and not Germany,
Brazil, or even the USA.:) Englands record over the past ten games
has been less than impressive, and if Norway can do the bizz at
home then there's no reason why Holland can't do it. They also have
the advantage that their playing at home and they don't have so much
media pressure.
No matter what the result is it will be a little strange that one of those teams
wont make it to the states. I hope its a good game and that the best team wins
not the luckiest no matter which team it is. Anyway by the time the game starts
I hope to be celebrating our qualification.... although I reckon we'll draw
against the Spanish....
-dave-
|
129.786 | The Mars Bar Kid vs. The Guiness Gulper | PAVONE::TURNER | | Thu Oct 07 1993 17:26 | 30 |
| re: .785
>Gary I believe your star player "the fat kid" eat too many mars bars
>during the previous games so they had to suspend him from this game!!
Yeah, he should take a lead from Ireland's own slimline, Jane Fonda
workout disciple, Ronnie Whelan! Actually, Gascoigne's injured (out for
the next month with a knee ligament problem) so he wouldn't have played
anyway.
I don't want to give Graham Taylor *too* much stick (after all, he did
get it right last time out ;-)), but it's funny how we always seem to
be trying out players, or combinations of players, in big matches.
Shearer made his debut against France and then didn't play again till
he was thrown in against the same country during Euro '92. Sharpe
played in the second half against Ireland at Wembley and then didn't
play again (if memory serves) until the second Norway game. And there
are other examples (Pallister, Sharpe...). So much for the concept of a
"settled team".
>No matter what the result is it will be a little strange that one of
>those teams wont make it to the states. I hope its a good game and that
>the best team wins not the luckiest no matter which team it is.
(Muffled choking sounds.)
Well, that *is* rich! Next you'll be saying that you don't mind if
Digital lay you off next week...so long as it's for the good of the
company! Go back and read some of your happy-go-lucky replies after
past England victories - you obviously enjoyed every minute of them.
Dom
|
129.787 | Read the Stars do we Dom..... | KBOMFG::TANNER | U2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!! | Thu Oct 07 1993 17:43 | 6 |
|
Dom Iam been layed of and their telling me its for the good of the company,
Iam sure that will bring a smile to your face.
-dave-
|
129.788 | Foot in mouth | PLUNDR::MORAN | Waist not, want not! | Thu Oct 07 1993 17:47 | 5 |
|
A phrase from the film "A Few Good Men" springs to mind. If you haven't
seen the film, sorry but I can't repeat it.
Tim
|
129.789 | Apologies. | PAVONE::TURNER | | Thu Oct 07 1993 18:03 | 7 |
| re: .787
If this is true, then I can only say that I'm very sorry.
And it doesn't bring a smile to my face. And no, I don't read the
stars.
Dom
|
129.790 | No worries Dom.... | KBOMFG::TANNER | U2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!! | Thu Oct 07 1993 18:18 | 11 |
|
Don't worry Dom.... Life goes on.... Yea sure I want Holland to win and to go
to the states, but I would prefer to see them win fair and square by two or
three clear goals, as regards poxing one in the dying seconds, I don't believe
that's fair on any team but unfortunately that's how it sometimes goes. My main
concern at the moment (regarding football) is that we qualify and preferably next
week, ie Ireland of course....
-dave-
p.s Thanks for the condolences, but its becoming popular at DEC.
|
129.791 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Tue Oct 12 1993 12:10 | 10 |
|
England team to face Holland to be announced at 12:00pm today.
Worrying reports that Taylor is about to bring in the prolific Paul
Merson, to partner Alan Shearer.
No Wright...No Sheringham...?????
Dave...
|
129.792 | Wright Is Fit | SHIPS::DURANT_S | | Tue Oct 12 1993 12:27 | 19 |
|
Wright is now fit and resumed full training yesterday, so should
partner Shearer up front according to the radio. However, Pearce is
still a problem and Dorigo may have to take his place.
I reckon the only doubts about Taylor's selection is the left back
position and who plays on the right to replace Gazza. The right I
think is between Sinton and Trevor Steven.
Seaman
Jones Pallister Adams Pearce/Dorigo
Sinton/Steven Ince Platt Sharpe
Shearer Wright
|
129.793 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Tue Oct 12 1993 12:32 | 9 |
|
Re-1
According to the radio this morning and various daily papers. Wright
will be dropped and Merson will take his place. Also Paul Parker will
replace Rob Jones and Carlton Palmer will come in for Gazza.
Dave...
|
129.794 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Tue Oct 12 1993 12:42 | 8 |
| yesterday the Amsterdam police arrested 39 England "supporters", they were
drunk and molested people with big chumps of wood, one of them knifed down
an innocent bystander.
it looks like the mess has already started and that it's a matter of time
it will be more.
T_
|
129.795 | It'll be a great game 1-2 to England | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Tue Oct 12 1993 13:47 | 4 |
| Anyone know of any pubs in Geneva that will be covering the game
tommorow, plus what timw dows it start?
-Dom
|
129.796 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | BLUE IS THE COLOUR | Tue Oct 12 1993 13:51 | 14 |
|
I hope the rumours about Merson,Wright and Palmer are wrong, I think
Sheringham should get a bite at the cherry.
I cant understand how Dennis wise hasn't been picked for the big
match, this just goes to prove that Taylor doesn't know what he's
doing. How can you not pick a player with an England record like
Dennis Wise..( one game one goal)
As to the football violence.. I'm sure our fellow English gentlemen
were only having a few quiet drinks and then were provoked by some little
irritating clog dancing fools.
Andy..B
|
129.797 | The world should be an enGERland free zone !!! | KIRKTN::CPATRICK | I'm doing it tomorrow | Tue Oct 12 1993 14:12 | 7 |
|
I think it is about time that all enGERland fans were banned from
going abroad.
How many country's will they have to cause trouble in before they are
either shot or banned for life.
SQF Jambo #1
|
129.798 | Stay At Home. | DBCIC1::62770::RUSSELL | Wexford All-Ireland Champions '94 | Tue Oct 12 1993 14:26 | 13 |
| Guys,
This is the pits. You all know I'd love to see England qualify, but in all honesty we
can all do without this short of crap.
After this bout of violence, I'll be rooting for Holland tomorrow. The rest of the World
can do without having to endure the hassles caused by the "tiny minority" of England
Supporters who cause all this grief.
The F.A. And the English Police should solve this problem....why should everyone else
have to suffer for their ineptitude?
*Tiger*
|
129.799 | | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Tue Oct 12 1993 14:51 | 15 |
|
This is getting boring who gives a shit about the violence. England
have a very important game tomorrow and yet again it's being over
shadowed by a small minority of so called "Football Supporters" it's
bad enough reading and hearing about it on every news report, let alone
idiots making stupid comments about it in this conferance. Lets keep
the chuck England out of the competition comments to yourself and
discuss issues about Englands most important game since the Semi Final
of the last World Cup......
Englands team will be announced at lunch time today and according to
the papers a number of changes will be made...I shall wait to hear what
the side is first before I pass comment..
Neil...
|
129.800 | Palmer for the Mars Bar Kid?(can't be tru) | SIOG::HOWARD | | Tue Oct 12 1993 15:00 | 2 |
| this must be ajoke about bringing Carlton Palmer back....isn't it?
does Taylor really want to qualify?
|
129.801 | A draws better for England... | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Tue Oct 12 1993 15:39 | 5 |
| ....does Taylor really want to quailfy?
Maybe he really wants a draw..
-Dom
|
129.802 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Tue Oct 12 1993 15:49 | 26 |
|
Team...
Seaman
Parker
Dorigo
Pallister
Adams
Palmer
Ince
Platt (capt)
Sharpe
Merson
Shearer
Err....Taylor is at it again, Merson playing for his country in a
position that he doesnt even play for his club. Ian Wright and Teddy
Sheringham must be sick.
Parker....???, he wasnt even picked in the squad for Poland, now he
edges out Rob Jones...and as for Palmer..
Graham Taylor is unbelievable.
Dave...
|
129.804 | | FORTY2::ASH | Mail Interchange Group, Reading | Tue Oct 12 1993 16:00 | 7 |
| This is bad . . . the only recommendation I heard for Palmer came from a
Dutchman, presumably Parker will attempt to mark Bergkamp, which will leave us
without a right back, and Merson, well, not on his current form.
Until 5 minutes ago, I was optimistic about tomorrow!
grahame
|
129.805 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Come the glorious day | Tue Oct 12 1993 16:18 | 21 |
| Personally, I'm hopeful.
The Dutch defence is, when all is said and done, crap. It is unlikely to be able
to hold Alan Shearer so all we really need is someone to cross to him. Paul
Merson, come on down.
Ian Wright hasn't scored against decent opposition for years now, and if Taylor
kept picking him it would be John Barnes all over again. He can't even play a
full game for Arsenal these days without getting substituted. Don't believe the
hype.
With Shearer alone up front, we'll be able to up the pace and dominate the
midfield. Whatever you say about Palmer, you can't fault the guy's work rate and
I'm confident that he'll get the job done.
Three one to England, and no Holland in USA '94.
A victory for justice, and England climb righteously back into the top 3
international teams.
Mike
|
129.806 | We're Doomed !! | SHIPS::DURANT_S | | Tue Oct 12 1993 16:21 | 13 |
|
From Radio Berkshire, the station that quite sensibly thought that if
Ian Wright was fit he would be partnering Alan Shearer, we hear that
Palmer is in to mark Bergkamp.
Why has the team been announced so early ? At least he could have kept
the Dutch quessing that he was going to pick a decent team, and maybe
go for the win.
I wish I had'nt listened to the news now.
Steve.
|
129.807 | Defensive side | GALVIA::SPAIN | signed long gary(); | Tue Oct 12 1993 16:29 | 12 |
|
Parker and Palmer are on for their defensive qualities. Merson will
probably play deep also. Taylor wants a draw. Holland need to win and
England don't. It's a final gamble. If he gets a result he's a hero.
The problem with horses for courses is that you don't have a settled
side. Remember Oslo.
I still think England will hang on for a point. If they get a win I'd
be surprised.
Gary.
|
129.808 | | CHEFS::HARRISR | Great things are afoot! | Tue Oct 12 1993 16:30 | 26 |
| I thought you all might want to be able to read note .798 and see what
the missing words were.
Rich.
<<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 129.798 World Cup qualifying Group 2 798 of 805
DBCIC1::62770::RUSSELL "Wexford All-Ireland Champio" 13 lines 12-OCT-1993 11:26
-< Stay At Home. >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guys,
This is the pits. You all know I'd love to see England qualify, but in all
honestly we can all do without this short of crap.
After this bout of violence, I'll be rooting for Holland tomorrow. The rest
of the World can do without having to endure the hassles caused by the
"tiny minority" of England supporters who cause all this grief.
The F.A. And the English Police should solve this problem....why should
everyone else have to suffer for their ineptitude?
*Tiger*
|
129.809 | Bye Bye Engerland :-( | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Tue Oct 12 1993 16:41 | 15 |
|
Ha,Ha,HaHa,Ha.
Well obviously Monsieur Taylor, being the gentleman that he is, felt
that it would not be cricket to field a coherent team against an
understrength Dutch side, so he picked the team out of a hat. I think it
must have been a fluke that Seaman actually ended up in goal. He's a
nice man isn't he your Mr. taylor !!!
Reports suggest that Laurie McMenamie was picked to partner Shearer until
someone pointed out that Taylor had misspelled Paul Merson. He probably
won't realise until just after kick-off tomorrow that Paul Merson
doesn't spell Mark Wright.
Oh Well, sigh....
Peter (An Impartial Celt).
|
129.810 | Good grief! | UNTADE::PCAS | Yorkie | Tue Oct 12 1993 16:48 | 11 |
|
I hate the predictions note, and this is turning into one. But, having
seen the team I can't help thinking that England might as well not
bother turning up. In a way England losing will not be too bad, at
least we get rid of Taylor - thank God.
Why bother going to Holland with a defensive team? - somebody mentioned
that the Dutch defence was useless (Mike I think), but England are
just as crap at defending, if not worse. So, much as I hate predictions
I reckon Holland 2 - England 0.
Al.
|
129.811 | Re .799 and .796 | KBOMFG::TANNER | U2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!! | Tue Oct 12 1993 16:49 | 5 |
|
With comments like that from Mr. Cossey and Barefield its no wonder your
image abroad is non-existent... but then again we all know ye.... and hopefully
ye won't get too sick if Holland stuff ye....
-dave-
|
129.812 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Tue Oct 12 1993 16:57 | 13 |
|
With this team, I would be very suprised if we win tomorrow. We could
hang on for a draw, but I can only see a Dutch win to be honest.
If we do somehow get a win, Taylor will be a very lucky man, and I bet
its a case of Holland playing badly rather than England going out a
deserving a win.
Very depressed....the thought of World Cup Football without us taking
part doesnt bare thinking about. I hope we win, even if it means having
to put up with Taylor until after the World Cup.
Dave...
|
129.813 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Tunami, tunami! | Tue Oct 12 1993 17:05 | 4 |
|
Have the subs been named?
Tim
|
129.814 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | BLUE IS THE COLOUR | Tue Oct 12 1993 17:15 | 5 |
|
Get back under you toadstool Tanner with all of your other Leprecaurns..
There's not MUSHROOM for your sort on this note.
You take life to seriously and I think you had better watch your 'ELF.
|
129.815 | | ECCGY4::HAIGH | If voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it. | Tue Oct 12 1993 17:18 | 15 |
|
Re .811,
I understand it's hard but please do not tar us all with the same
brush as the noters you mentioned and the retards in Holland. I heard
that the English police supplied pictures and files on known offenders
which has resulted in some deportations and others being refused entry
at the sea ports.
Back to the team, I agree with Mr Wilson (Is this a first? :-) ),
it looks like a replay of Norway. Taylor putting out a team to get a
draw, which will probably back fire again.
Steve
|
129.816 | WHATS TAYLOR DOING NOW! | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Tue Oct 12 1993 17:34 | 11 |
|
Graham Taylor does it again just when you think he's at last got it
right he pulls another trick out of the bag....This man should have
been extridited with all the other morons.....Get him out...
Neil...
A pi**ed off sensible noter thats fed up with being tarred
with the same brush as Mr Barefield......
|
129.817 | Re .815 | KBOMFG::TANNER | U2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!! | Tue Oct 12 1993 17:37 | 12 |
|
Steve I know there's good ones out there.... who know what their talking
about and accept that your team is average and that a minority of your fans are
animals... and that an even smaller minority who write in hear are still wearing
nappies. Mr barefield its not Leprecaurns its Leprechauns, but not a bad try for
your age.
-dave-
p.s That's a strange looking lineout for tomorrows game, Ton any news on the
Dutch team???????
|
129.818 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | BLUE IS THE COLOUR | Tue Oct 12 1993 17:49 | 8 |
|
Sorry about the spelling, but it was Mr Cossey who told me how
to spell it.
By the way... You dont fool any of us Neil, youv'e shown your true
colours to many times on this notes file.
Andy..B
|
129.819 | | GAOV10::MURPHY | | Tue Oct 12 1993 18:28 | 2 |
| I'd rather be small green and cute(Leprechauns)than short,fat,and
ugly.(Bulldogs).
|
129.820 | Leprechauns | UBOHUB::MCKEAVENEYJ | And then there were none... | Tue Oct 12 1993 18:33 | 9 |
129.821 | Rather be a Leprechaun. | GAOV10::MURPHY | | Tue Oct 12 1993 19:02 | 9 |
| Sean,
I was having a go at PEKING::BAREFIELDA fo his remarks at us
Leprechauns.
Regards,
Anthony.
"
-
|
129.822 | | UBOHUB::MCKEAVENEYJ | And then there were none... | Tue Oct 12 1993 19:04 | 2 |
|
|
129.823 | Should be a tough one.... | GYMAC::DCASSIDY | | Tue Oct 12 1993 19:08 | 34 |
|
England's team does look a bit on the 'restrain them' rather than
'stretch them' capabilities. Before I go any further...I'm not
justifying the team selection on Graham Taylor's part but there are a
few things worth bearing in mind. A few mentioned that:
1. Holland need to win rather than draw more than England do.
2. Holland's defence is not the best around.
3. Holland are playing in front of a very passionate and sometimes
just as impatient crowd as England's Wembley faithfuls.
The ball is really in Holland's court and I suppose the England selection
reflects this. Taylor it seems, is hoping to frustrate the Dutch to the
point that when Ince, Platt, Sharpe And/or Merson CAN get to make some
runs, the amount of free space will be that much better and maybe
Shearer can get on the end of a few. Whether he'll put them away is a
different matter. This of course assumes that England's defence is
capable of holding the likes of Van Vossen, Bergkamp and Roy for at
least up until half time.
In reality I can see a repeat of the England-Germany game in Detroit
during the summer where Ziege and Effenberg tore shreds out of England's
midfield.
Key men tomorrow ?? Bergkamp and Platt I'd say. Who's playing the
better club football ? Who's the more experienced ?
There are too many cancelling effects on both sides. An honest man
would say 'let the better team win'; so far 'on paper' that 'seems' to be
Holland.
Cheers,
Dezzz.
|
129.824 | And Again | UBOHUB::MCKEAVENEYJ | And then there were none... | Tue Oct 12 1993 19:10 | 7 |
129.825 | Holland Gain An Advantage | SHIPS::DURANT_S | | Tue Oct 12 1993 19:29 | 8 |
|
I thought manager's did not have to inform the officials of their team
selection until an hour before kick off. Why give Holland the chance to
plan their team and tactics ?
Perhaps Taylor has already cleared his desk.
Steve.
|
129.826 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | BLUE IS THE COLOUR | Tue Oct 12 1993 19:39 | 11 |
|
I dont know why Taylor doesn't field a side for some attacking
football. If we go out then we should go out fighting and not go
out defending for 90 minutes. He's made a right mess up with this
England team and it may see us out of the world cup. How anybody
can field Calton Palmer in the England side is beyond me, he's crap.
If we get a new manager then I can see Dennis Wise making his second
Appearence in the England side, one game one goal is a brilliant
scoring record for any player.
Andy..B
|
129.827 | Results huh !!! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Tue Oct 12 1993 19:46 | 10 |
|
If our Grahame is going to play defensive football for (Results)
I for one can't wait for the World Cup ,group games, if England
do qualify.
But they're not going to qualify, so why worry.
Play for a win or don't play at all !!!!!!!!!!!
Peter (An Impartial Celt).
|
129.829 | Other games? | MOEUR1::SMITH | | Tue Oct 12 1993 19:50 | 6 |
|
Does anyone have a list of all the games that are being played tomorrow
night? England, France, Ireland I know, any others?
Cheers,
Ian
|
129.830 | and vinny too | SIOG::HOWARD | | Tue Oct 12 1993 19:52 | 8 |
| re bring back Wise....
hear hear
those two-footed, knee-high tackles are sorely missed at
international level....
bring him back in....couldn't do much worse than the rest
|
129.831 | TV? | MOEUR1::SMITH | | Tue Oct 12 1993 19:54 | 6 |
|
Is the game on TV? Live? Where, when, which channel, satellite etc
etc allthe usual (probably already answered questions!)?
Thanks a lot,
Ian
|
129.832 | Who's broadcasting the England game?? | BERN02::GOODEJ | | Tue Oct 12 1993 19:55 | 5 |
|
Does anyone know if the England game's being broadcast on a satellite
channel? If so, which one and on what satellite? Also the Wales game?
JBG
|
129.833 | | UBOHUB::MCKEAVENEYJ | And then there were none... | Tue Oct 12 1993 19:58 | 5 |
129.834 | Any satellite channels? | MOEUR1::SMITH | | Tue Oct 12 1993 19:59 | 1 |
|
|
129.835 | Rumour has it.... | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Tue Oct 12 1993 20:10 | 4 |
| For those in the French/Swiss guys and gals I've been told
the games on Canal+
-Dom
|
129.836 | At least he wants to play ... | FILTON::KEARNS_R | Dear Baby, Welcome to Dumpsville | Tue Oct 12 1993 20:50 | 9 |
|
I think Palmer has done more in an England shirt to justify selection
compared to players like Parker and Merson.
Rob..
BTW Ian wright is the only named sub. Looks like he'll be played in
the last ten minutes as England try to get the equalizer..
Also the only time I've seen Dennis Wise play an international
(England B) he was booed of the pitch, mind you he did score..
|
129.837 | Holland 2 England 1 | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Wed Oct 13 1993 10:50 | 33 |
| <<< Note 129.817 by KBOMFG::TANNER "U2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!!" >>>
-< Re .815 >
>>p.s That's a strange looking lineout for tomorrows game, Ton any news on the
>> Dutch team???????
Possible line-up for tonight game
de Goeij
Koeman
De Wolf de Boer
Rijkaard Wouters Koeman
Bergkamp
Overmars de Boer Roy
One other possibility is that Ulrich van Gobbel will play pushing de Boer into
midfield and Koeman onto the bench.
T_
|
129.838 | It won't go away..!! | PAKORA::SWRIGHT | Beavis and Butthead | Wed Oct 13 1993 11:22 | 7 |
| Reported this morning...
England fans Go on the Rampage in Holland again last night (190)
attacking Innocent people in the street.
|
129.839 | The majority spoil it for the minority AGAIN! | KIRKTN::MCAMERON | | Wed Oct 13 1993 11:40 | 10 |
|
Just for a change, it was also reported.......
One or two mindless individuals caused all the trouble..
The rest of the poor unfortunates arrested were all victims of heavy
handed tactics by the Dutch riot police........Seem to have heard this
one somewhere before.
Ban them ALL....Martin SQFCSC
|
129.840 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Wed Oct 13 1993 11:40 | 18 |
| <<< Note 129.838 by PAKORA::SWRIGHT "Beavis and Butthead" >>>
-< It won't go away..!! >-
>> Reported this morning...
>>
>>
>> England fans Go on the Rampage in Holland again last night (190)
>> attacking Innocent people in the street.
No worries most of them have already been kicked out of Holland, the ones
that stayed here will have to visit a guy in a black dress tommorow :-))))
T_
|
129.841 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Wed Oct 13 1993 11:50 | 16 |
|
Is Graham Taylor about to go over the edge ?, he apparently blew a fuse
yesterday over critism over his "defensive" team for tonights game, even
swearing at one reporter who asked him why he had made so many changes
from the team that faced Holland.
I didnt see any of the press conference, but reports say he was very
nervous with some reports describing him as "crazy".
I'm not at all confident about England getting any sort of result
tonight.
Dave...
|
129.842 | Getting sick of it... | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Wed Oct 13 1993 11:55 | 5 |
| Amsterdam was almost a battlefield yesterday untill late in the night.
According the press 140 arrests. And only after escalation of violence
the riot police (ME) was on the spot.....Don't these people realise
that they can cause banning of the team if they continue like that ?
Hopefully Holland can do it tonight on the way how it belongs !
|
129.843 | ashamed..... | WELCLU::BROWNI | The Man who sold the World | Wed Oct 13 1993 12:02 | 6 |
| Something has to be done about this minority that start all the
trouble. Lock 'em up and throw away the key.
Makes me ashamed to be English.
Ian
|
129.844 | | SUBURB::GROOMN | Earning a fortune, paid a pittance !! | Wed Oct 13 1993 12:14 | 15 |
|
Well I think GT has done a great selection job, the only question mark
being the inclusion of Merson who, as mentioned earlier, isn't renowned
at that position for his club. I would certainly have gone for
Sherringham or perhaps even Cole. The inclusion of Parker isn't such a
bad thing, let's face it, GT has to make the best of a bad lot at right
back. Carlton Palmer works his butt off for 90 minutes every game he
plays, even though he runs like an ostrich and will form a substantial
obstacle alongside Ince in midfield allowing Sharpe and Platt to get
forward more frequently.
I think England will win 2-1 or perhaps draw, but this is not a losing
team.
Ever hopeful - Nev
|
129.845 | Ban arrested fans for life !!!!! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Wed Oct 13 1993 12:15 | 15 |
|
Why is there so little trouble at English League games in
recent years ? Is it just not reported, or do the police
just manage to control it ?
It just seems strange that, you've cleaned up your act at home
but the scum seems to still find an outlet abroad ! Why are these
trouble makers allowed to travel. If they can be kept quite at home
well then the police must know who they are.
The bit about a couple of fans starting the trouble and the Dutch
police going hell for leather after innocent English fans seems a lot
like bull to me. If the 190 had've been running away from the trouble
they wouldn't have been touched !!!!!
Peter(An Impartial Celt).
|
129.846 | TV Highlights on Eurosport | BERN02::GOODEJ | | Wed Oct 13 1993 12:27 | 19 |
|
Re .831/2/3/4/5...
I checked on teletex last night and it appears that Eurosport have a
2 hour program showing the highlights from three matches starting at
23:00pm tonight (that GMT and CET at the moment!)
The matches being covered are:
Portugal - Switzerland
Holland - England
Italy - Scotland
Another program tomorrow night (at 22:00) will show the highlights
of a further three matches....I think these include the Ireland-Spain
and Denmark-N. Ireland games. I still haven't seen any mention of the
Wales-Cyprus game!
JBG Bern Switzerland
|
129.847 | | YUPPY::PANES | Helping the Police with their enquiries | Wed Oct 13 1993 13:29 | 16 |
| According to a report I heard on the radio this morning, the reason
why Taylor lost it was because when he announced the team a good few
journalists started laughing ( and who can blame them).
re our not so invisible exports.
The word on the street is "Holland and out". Whichever way the result goes
our ambassadors see this as their finest ( and last ) moment.
As to why a police force ,that has to deal with hooliganism on a far grander
scale ( fragmentation grenades etc ) than "our boys" ever manage, cannot deal
with a few intellectually challenged yobs , is beyond my ken.
Hugs,
stuart
|
129.848 | Try Eutelsat.... | GYMAC::DCASSIDY | | Wed Oct 13 1993 13:40 | 7 |
|
Anybody with a satellite dish should try the Eutelsat birds on 16, 13,
10 and 7 degrees where they usually have the feeds on World Cup games.
Most of Irelands games were to be found albeit no commentary on these
satellites.
Dezzz.
|
129.849 | It'll do for tonight too.... | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Wed Oct 13 1993 14:15 | 5 |
| Last night the U21 teams played a draw 1-1.....
Poland's U21 beat Norway 0-2
-Dom
|
129.850 | | ECCGY4::HAIGH | If voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it. | Wed Oct 13 1993 14:22 | 9 |
|
> Why is there so little trouble at English League games in
> recent years ? Is it just not reported, or do the police
> just manage to control it ?
A good question. Nationalistic fervour (similar to what we see in
Dresden/Leipzig only the language is different) drummed up by the
gutter press and the moronic right, is one possible explanation.
|
129.851 | England! England! England! England! | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Wed Oct 13 1993 15:28 | 7 |
|
Well the kick-Off is about 8hrs away...So it's prediction time...
I really expect England to get a result so I'm going to stick my neck
out and go for a 2-0 win to England......
Neil...
|
129.852 | England needs Hooligans like it needs G.Taylor | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Wed Oct 13 1993 15:32 | 8 |
| I'll go for a 1-2 win for England.....
...as said many times before the Hooligan problem has really nothing
to do with Football, its a Social problem, these morons probably
know next to nothing about football and couldn't play if they tried,
there just 'Football's curse'
-Dom
|
129.853 | Aanvalle !!!! | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Wed Oct 13 1993 15:34 | 7 |
| 2-0 for Holland.
By the way strange that you see here the opposite ; hooligans are
mostly visible in clubgames ; Ajax, Feyenoord etc ( getting less
fortunately..) but when the national team plays everyone behaves like
an (orange) angle.......
John
|
129.854 | Simply the best | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Wed Oct 13 1993 16:16 | 4 |
|
3 - 1 to Holland
|
129.855 | You heard it here | XSTACY::JLUNDON | @GAO 822-4715 Apathy is the most terrible vice! | Wed Oct 13 1993 16:23 | 1 |
| Holland 4 - England 2
|
129.856 | No Mars, no Platt , no ..... | BRSISD::CLAIRE::ROOSEN | | Wed Oct 13 1993 16:38 | 7 |
| It all doesn't matter, both will not be qualified anyway, there the
Norwegians and the Poles will go through.
Therefore I predict (that's what I really hope it will be) a draw
Holland 6 England 6
Paddy
|
129.857 | May the best team win!... | OSLACT::HENRIKW | Making the most of misery | Wed Oct 13 1993 16:50 | 8 |
| ...as long as one of them wins! - And one of them loses. ;^)
It's a shame they can't both join Norway in the World Cup...
Anyway, you Dutch and English will probably be watching a better
game as such, than Poland vs Norway.
henrik
|
129.858 | No England fans at the Game | PEKING::MCKIEN | NICK | Wed Oct 13 1993 16:52 | 8 |
|
2-1 to England
Merson and Palmer to score one each.
Nick.
|
129.859 | I hope Un-ger-land git gubbed ! | PAKORA::JJACK | | Wed Oct 13 1993 17:33 | 8 |
|
I don't care who wins..............
As long as it's Holland !
3-1 to the Dutch !
|
129.860 | after all,we are all British!!! | KIRKTN::GDOUGALL | | Wed Oct 13 1993 17:45 | 15 |
| re-I don't care who wins.........
as long as it's Holland
Hey JJ you can't say that, what you meant to say was.......
PLEASE let Holland win!!!!!
Dutch 2 GT's defence 1
A,Scot
|
129.861 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Wed Oct 13 1993 17:45 | 18 |
| <<< Note 129.856 by BRSISD::CLAIRE::ROOSEN >>>
-< No Mars, no Platt , no ..... >-
>>It all doesn't matter, both will not be qualified anyway, there the
>>Norwegians and the Poles will go through.
>>Therefore I predict (that's what I really hope it will be) a draw
>>
>> Holland 6 England 6
>>
>>Paddy
Je moet een echte Belg zijn om zo iets te voorspellen.
Poland hasn't got anything to do in the US!
Holland!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
129.862 | Here we go again | NEWOA::BURTON | | Wed Oct 13 1993 17:58 | 12 |
|
Just heard on the radio that this more fights are breaking out in
Rotterdam. Thousands of English and Dutch fans are now in the Rotterdam
ready for tonights game. Dutch police are starting to worry due to
large groups from both England and Holland acting aggressively towards
each other.
If it's like this now at lunchtime, god knows what it will be like
this evening.
Cheers
Nige
|
129.863 | I was a Dogs dinner too | KERNEL::WITHALLG | Even Better Than The Real Thing | Wed Oct 13 1993 17:58 | 35 |
|
Re .798 and any others about the subject...
I have just returned from Amsterdam - Came back Monday night.
And whilst I have to agree that a mindless few are again at large
it is not entirely the Engerlanders fault. The police were rounding up
many an innocent group and shoving them onto busses. For those of you
who don't know the area, the main trouble spots were around and in
the red light area, Damrak. The streets are relatively short, narrow
and divided up by small bridges that go across the canals. This splits
the streets into say 100meter sections with Bridges either end,
Buildings behind you and the canal in front. No escape route for anyone
if held here. The police were trapping everyone in these type areas and
carting them all off on busses. That was innocent and guilty alike.
The majority were the innocent. What was going to happen was
inevitable, the police were using their truncheons and many had dogs,
the guilty and innocent had two choices, stand and get hit/bitten or try
to escape and get hit/bitten either way we lost.
"Im sorry officer and Nice Doggie" cut no ice here.
Don't get me wrong, Im not defending the louts who were chucked out but
not everyone was guilty. Yet we all get tarred with the same brush and
we all get beaten and bitten by the same policemen and their dogs.
So where does it all go ?. What do you do next ?.
Of course there is going to be violence. The plain hooligan will cause
violence because thats what he/she does. The innocent, when provoked
will respond likewise.
??.
Gary
|
129.864 | A possibility to see it in Europe... | GYMAC::DCASSIDY | | Wed Oct 13 1993 18:20 | 13 |
|
Apparently the match is on RTL-5 on Astra.......
Tricky to get but ...10.934 Vertical....
If you can't tune down that far on your receiver...tune down to 10.950
and there should be an on-screen menu to adjust the skew...Adjust down
(on Amstrad models anyway) to -10 and you have RTL-5.....
Don't blame me if its only for terrestrial RTL-5 and not satelite...
Hope this helps...
Dezzz.
|
129.865 | wop it up'em | FILTON::KEARNS_R | uh oh KWYGYBO on the loose | Wed Oct 13 1993 19:45 | 10 |
|
Only three hours to go....
COME
ON
ENGLAND ......
|
129.866 | The SPanish Inquisition in Dublin | DBCIC1::62770::RUSSELL | Wexford All-Ireland Champions '94 | Wed Oct 13 1993 19:48 | 9 |
| Guys,
I take back my comment about hoping England dont qualify because of the hooligans. After
watching Ireland get slaughtered by the Spanish today, I hope somebody can make it from
these Islands.
Best of luck tonight, stick it to them.
*Tiger* 8^(((((((((((((
|
129.867 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Wed Oct 13 1993 19:51 | 11 |
| complete riot in Rotterdam, They mayor of Rotterdam has given the police
special power so they can arrest someone for looking funny, fights have been
reported in the whole town and I have been listening to Radio Rotterdam
so I received the news first hand, also Dutch supporters are trowing punches
and a group of four hunderd were bashing the English near the Doelen in
Rotterdam at noon.
|
129.868 | sick b*st*rd | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Wed Oct 13 1993 19:52 | 2 |
| <<< Note 129.866 by DBCIC1::62770::RUSSELL "Wexford All-Ireland Champions '94" >>>
-< The SPanish Inquisition in Dublin >-
|
129.869 | ? | IMAPC::MURRAY | | Wed Oct 13 1993 19:59 | 1 |
|
|
129.870 | ENGLAND! ENGLAND! ENGLAND! ENGLAND! | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Wed Oct 13 1993 20:11 | 7 |
|
On me way home shortly......Come on England make coming to work
tomorrow worth while....
U.S.A. here we come...........
Neil....
|
129.871 | I just read it as I hear it. | PEKING::ROBERTSOND | SHELLEY PINKERTON | Wed Oct 13 1993 20:16 | 7 |
| News from the radio,
One fan has been shot,
some have been deported, and some who are being flown back are fighting
the police on the planes!!!
|
129.872 | eh??? | DBCIC1::62770::RUSSELL | Wexford All-Ireland Champions '94 | Wed Oct 13 1993 20:16 | 7 |
| Ton,
re my "SPanish Inquisition in Dublin"....what do ye mean by saying "SIck B*S*T*R*"???
Watching the game live was psychically damaging, I can assure you.
*Tiger*
|
129.875 | | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | U.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there! | Thu Oct 14 1993 01:06 | 7 |
| It's over....
Holland 2 Greatest Team in World 0
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
129.876 | Norway win 3-0 | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | U.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there! | Thu Oct 14 1993 01:39 | 2 |
| Apparently my info on Poland was wrong as Norway won 3-0 which my
maths tells me means they're coming to the U.S
|
129.877 | Group 2 table | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | U.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there! | Thu Oct 14 1993 06:16 | 43 |
| OK finally confirmed that Norway did indeed beat Poland 3-0 so congrats
to them for qualifying for the world Cup
watched the England v Holland game on tape delay and I have so say
(even though i'm welsh) that I thought England were unlucky.
Both Dorigo and merson hit the post and i'm fairly sure that Platt
should have had a penalty for that daylight assault by Koeman in the
box.
of course Koeman should have been sent off which means that 2 mins
later he wouldn't have been able to have scored at the other end.
on the other hand Rijkaard wasn't offside at the end of the first half
so the Dutch should have been 1-0 up at the half... and Bergampf's goal
was a beauty.
It's too late (at night) to work out what combination of results could
still see England qualigy so here's the updated table
regards,
andrew.D.Wicks
Group 2
GP W D L GF GA Pts
Norway 9 7 2 0 24 3 16
Netherlands 9 5 3 1 26 8 13
England 9 4 3 2 19 8 11
Poland 8 3 2 3 8 10 8
Turkey 8 1 1 6 7 17 3
San Marino 9 0 1 8 1 39 1
Group 2
13.10.93: Netherlands-England 2-0
13.10.93: Poland-Norway 0-3
27.10.93: Turkey-Poland
10.11 93: Turkey-Norway
16.11.93: San Marino-England
17.11.93: Poland-Netherlands
|
129.878 | Therr oot tae.))))) | KURMA::ISUTHERLAND | The World's Greatest Loafer | Thu Oct 14 1993 06:48 | 4 |
|
Re:last.
If Holland lose 1-0 to Poland,then England need to beat San Marino
7-0 to qualify.
|
129.879 | Gloom | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Thu Oct 14 1993 10:48 | 6 |
|
...well at least now Taylor will have to resign.........
-Dom :-(
|
129.880 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Oct 14 1993 10:57 | 16 |
|
Ok... we are out.
Totally p*ssed off this morning, as a game it was good, but the result
was too imprtant to worry about good games. England competed, but the
typical inane Taylor tactics of punting the ball up the field hoping
that Shearer, who despite his definate ability isnt Les Ferdinand in
the air and in any case was not in the game, again wasnt good enough.
We can say we were unlucky, and we were in this game, twice hitting the
post and the Platt/Koemen incident. Then again Rijkard's goal wasnt
offside, so the luck wasnt all one way.
At the end of the day, we should never have been in this position in
the first place...and there is only one man to blame for that.
Dave...very unhappy.
|
129.881 | Devastated But Not Cheated | PANIC::ANDERSON | Endsleigh League Div 1 (Midlands) | Thu Oct 14 1993 11:23 | 33 |
|
Congratulations to Holland. Good luck to Ton & his boys...
...that's enough of the magnanimity, for although I'm not one of the
mindless xenophobes in here that believes we have a divine right to be
amongst the best in the world, I'm deeply dissappointed that England
will not be competing in The States.
Before the whingeing starts in earnest and the myopia sets in, I'd like
to state my view of last night's events:
1. Koeman probably should have been sent off, but :
it was no penalty;
Rijkaard's 'goal' should have meant it was already 1-0.
2. Koeman shouldn't have been allowed to score because [IMO] the trip
by Pallister was inside the box - penalty.
3. Aren't international goalkeepers supposed to be of a standard to get
their 'angles' right? Bergkamp's effort was superbly placed, but Seaman
should have had it covered.
4. Holland were the more fluent team last night.
England's World Cup campaign faltered with the home draws to Norway &
Holland, died in Oslo, and was buried last night.
Only the ghost of Poland can exhume the body before decomposition sets
in, and that *is* clutching at straws.
Rob
|
129.883 | He's going to chip it ...!!!!!! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Thu Oct 14 1993 12:06 | 9 |
|
In fairness (no compensation I'm sure) England and Holland gave us one
of the best games so far this season. Yeah the "blonde chap" should have
been sent off and platt should've scored, but on the night Holland were
the better teamand they deserved their win.
Taylors whinges during the post match interview were pathetic. At least
he only has three more years to run on his contract.
Peter(An Impartial Celt);
|
129.884 | Come On Poland ! | NEWOA::FIDO_T | Conation is the key | Thu Oct 14 1993 12:08 | 20 |
| > 3. Aren't international goalkeepers supposed to be of a standard to get
> their 'angles' right? Bergkamp's effort was superbly placed, but Seaman
> should have had it covered.
I'm not blaming Seaman for England's failure to qualify, but he was out
of position for both Dutch goals. Having said that, the double save
made against Berkamp and then Rijkard was incredible and he also made
some other good saves.
It must have been a good game to watch for anybody impartial, but in
the end, England don't have the class players that the Dutch have. They
gave the ball away far too often, while the Dutch put whole strings of
passes together.
That Koeman was not sent off for pulling Platt back was a disgrace,
although I think that it was clearly outside the box. FIFA really ought
to get their act together on that type of "professional" foul.
Terry
|
129.885 | | CHEFS::HARRISR | Great things are afoot! | Thu Oct 14 1993 12:15 | 15 |
| No matter about the absolutely appalling refereeing and lining
decisions, England never looked likely to win. Our only exciting player
on the pitch was Platt. Merson was OK, but we never really had any
penetration. The England side was crying out for Gascoigne ( when he's
was playing well ). We needed a playmaker. Parker had an identity
crisis, and kept passing to any player in an orange shirt. We had no
player who would go to the end of the byline, hold the ball up and whip
a cross over. The ball was crossed far to early, and never looked
really dangerous. Sharpe needs to improve his delivery. Where were the
players in the team who make people go, I like to watch him play, it
certainly wasn't Sinton, or Palmer. Ince had a good game, but got a
curious booking. I would have prefered Englands chances against ten
men, but otherwise, it never really looked like happening.
Rich.
|
129.886 | RRRRR Nuts | KERNEL::WITHALLG | Even Better Than The Real Thing | Thu Oct 14 1993 12:24 | 20 |
|
Well - Im gutted. I was off to the states to see an old girlfriend.
Now what am I going to do ?. Poor decisions ran for both teams,
Rikaard's goal counted, Koeman should have been in the bath well
before the free kick. Ince deserved to be booked for running out of
the wall and the fella who took his neck off with that jumping lunging
turning spinning kick should have been carded aswel.
Yung Lee Sharpe should be the last Chinaman to play for England,
his distribution was worse than Group 4 security. He's lucky he wasn't
born a spastic because he just can't use his feet.
On the plus side -
there is no plus side. It may aswel snow til next summer, when it can
snow then aswel for all I care.
Gary - cheesed off -
|
129.887 | On our way to the USA | OSLACT::HENRIKW | Making the most of misery | Thu Oct 14 1993 12:33 | 8 |
129.888 | Norway on their way... | KBOMFG::KOEPPE | Counting the days... | Thu Oct 14 1993 12:52 | 17 |
| First of all, congratulations to Norway !!!!
I was really surprised that the German ref didn't send Koeman
off. In the Bundesliga that ref wouldn't have hesitated one second
to show the red card. I agree the refereeing was bad (from the few
scenes I saw), but the ref can't be blamed for England loosing.
I can't see Poland winning against Holland and it wouldn't
surprise me if England score 7 against San Marino just to get rid of
their frustration.
If things go really bad there won't be any team from the British
Isles (including Ireland ;-)) in the US next year, but I hope not.
Has that ever happened before?
Just my opinion
Eduard
|
129.889 | Yes, I knew...2-0.... | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Thu Oct 14 1993 12:55 | 18 |
| Exciting game, the luckiest won ( as Wouters stated just after the
game). The luck we miss against other teams ( Norway, Poland) is coming
back to us in almost every England game. I can imagine that you get
Hollandsick as England fan ; it started in the game in the EC '88.
Holland won 3-1, England hit the post twice. Two years later during the
world championships a clear goal ( free kick) wasn't counted. Well and
the last two games are to fresh in memory to see the luck.
Yes, perhaps we had the better team but in the first half we were a
bunch of nervous unsure players. England had the best chances. In the
second half then it finally got decided.
I think both teams deserved to go through but both had made to many
failures before this game. And still it is not clear who is going to
the US. Norway looked during the whole the best team, they didn't make
the mistakes and go rightfully through !
Pity that this victory has this strange scent of decisions of the
referee......
John
|
129.890 | Sweden & Norway on the way..! | BCFI::PIHLSTROM | The bowsprit looks forward | Thu Oct 14 1993 12:59 | 16 |
|
NU (Nordic Union)
\ \ \
\ /\ \ /\ \ /\
:. /_____/ \_ :) /_____/ \_ :> /_____/ \_
/ \ / \ / \
/ (DEN) \ / (SWE) \ / (NOR) \
\ / \ / \ /
/_ /_ /_
Hey Norway..!
We must wait for our friends in Denmark before we go to the US!
The Swedish Swagman
|
129.891 | | FORTY2::ROBERTSON | Can't think of a decent personal name | Thu Oct 14 1993 13:24 | 32 |
| re-.2
>> Two years later during the world championships a clear goal ( free kick)
>> wasn't counted
John,
That Free kick ( by Pearce ) was unfortunately an indirect free kick, and it
didn't touch anyone on the way into the goal, hence the reason it was disallowed.
My comments about last night, it's all been said before:
1. Rijkaard's goal should have counted.
2. Koeman should have walked, though not a penalty.
3. If 2 had happened he wouldn't have scored. But who's to say someone
else wouldn't have??
4. England lacked any flair, or imagination. The only time they came
close to scoring was from free kicks just outside the box ( Dorigo &
Merson )
5. Why the hell did Taylor take Merson off for Wright. With 20 minutes
left to save your world cup campaign, needing at least 2 goals, you
take off a midfielder/defender and stick an extra forward on. I know
England still can qualify ( mathematically ) but I cannot see Poland
beating the Dutch.
6. The Dutch were the better team.
Al
|
129.892 | | CUCKOO::SMITHP1 | Radio Gnome Invisible | Thu Oct 14 1993 13:38 | 19 |
|
What are you lot on ?? The only reason last nights game was
exciting was because the winner almost definitely made sure
of a place in the 94 World Cup finals.
The game itself was as dull as I've seen this season (except
possibly Man.City v Oldham), except for the 'was it/wasn't it'
penalty controversies.
The English team looked like eleven footballers that had never
even seen each other before, let alone played on the same team.
They play Wimbledon style, but saying that, Wimbledon do it much
better.
...and as for Taylor's team selection.......<sounds of wailing
and much gnashing of teeth>
p1
|
129.893 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Come the glorious day | Thu Oct 14 1993 13:40 | 21 |
| Obviously, I am completely gutted.
At least whoever takes over as England manager won't have to worry about
competitive football for years, because we qualify for the next European
championships automatically. Plenty of time to build a decent team (just like
Taylor had).
Koeman should be shot at the very least, and I certainly won't be supporting the
Dutch in the USA, because I am a bad, nay, abysmal loser.
The only hint of silver lining to this cloud is the fact that if we did have to
miss a World Cup, at least we picked the right one. The World Cup in USA indeed.
Stupid idea anyway.
Perhaps it was a cunning plan on the part of Graham to avoid the embarrassment
of having to explain our beloved sport to the handful of Americans who express
an interest when they're not playing rounders.
I was right about the Dutch defence though.... 8-)
Mike
|
129.894 | England are out.!!! | ESSB::MCUNNIFFE | Even Better than the Real Thing | Thu Oct 14 1993 13:46 | 18 |
|
Holland 2 England 0
Congratulations to Holland on a great win that had me on the edge of my seat.
It was great to see Turnip head Taylor in such anguish at the end. He
complained about Koeman not walking but nobody mentioned that Rikjkard had
a perfectly legitimate goal disallowed.
No doubt Koeman should have walked but it was even more satisfying for me
when he went down the other end and lobbed the ball into the corner after
Seaman had invited him to place it there. The second goal was a cracker from
Berkhamp and England are out of the world cup.
I was very disappointed after the Spanish game but things ended on a high.
C U N N O
|
129.895 | Cunno to the rescue..... | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Thu Oct 14 1993 13:56 | 11 |
|
re .894
I thought Ireland's dismal performance would have stamped out any
anti-English arrogance in this note, but then again I might have
guessed Cunno would carry the flag for the "England haters".
By the way which club team do you support? Liverpool you say.....
Thet were ENGLISH last time I looked......
|
129.896 | | KERNEL::WITHALLG | Even Better Than The Real Thing | Thu Oct 14 1993 13:57 | 17 |
|
Cunno,
1 ) change yopur personal name you poaching unpatriotic mother.
2 ) it was even more satisfying for me when he went down the other end
and lobbed the ball into the corner......
And you have your own note ???????.
Choke and die. ;-)
|
129.897 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | BLUE IS THE COLOUR | Thu Oct 14 1993 14:08 | 17 |
|
There's no good saying what should have been, were more or less
out unless Poland can turn over the Dutch in Poland. How did that big fat
defender stay on the pitch, the ref must still be a bit p***** off
about the war..
Dissapointed about the reaction of the Dutch Police, England fans were
picked off the street for not even doing anything. Maybe they should
have all purchased a pair of clogs and gone busking outside the ground
before kick off. Its not right that you get thrown into a van just
because your enjoying yourself. Looking at the news last night the
Dutch didn't seem very friendly either, one scene showed some poor
English man getting the kicking of his life..And that must hurt
being kicked in the teeth by lumps of wood, he's probably got bad
splinters in his gumbs now...
Andy..B
|
129.898 | | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Thu Oct 14 1993 14:55 | 15 |
|
re: .895 Hear Hear !!!!!
I'm not supporting Mr. Cunno but if you ever wanted a reason as to why the
English team are disliked so much (here) just replay the post match interviews
given by both Platt & Taylor. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh !!!!!!!!!!!!
and compare them to the dignified and well balanced interviews give by
Jack & the Irish players.
It's not your fault, I know, but when the face of English football is a
whinging git it's hard to support them.
Peter(An Impartial Celt).
|
129.899 | Maybe an Irish ref would have been better :-) | ISEPUB::CHAMPOLLION | Can-tas-tic | Thu Oct 14 1993 15:07 | 6 |
129.900 | | YUPPY::PANES | A heart of gold, and a knob of butter | Thu Oct 14 1993 15:09 | 7 |
| Was Sharpe playing???
Will David Van Seaman ever play for England again?
Questions questions,
Stuart
|
129.901 | Seaman - England No'1 | KERNEL::WITHALLG | Even Better Than The Real Thing | Thu Oct 14 1993 15:19 | 9 |
|
Dave Seaman pulled off a blinder, I would have bet my mortgage that
Rijkaard would have tucked that one away. As for the 2nd goal...
Couldn't say, he didn't stop it thats for sure, but then Bergkamp
didn't intend Seaman to stop it.
|
129.902 | The better, luckier team won on the night | KBOMFG::TANNER | U2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!! | Thu Oct 14 1993 15:23 | 8 |
|
Well its no longer in your hands, I can understand how ye feel similar to
how I felt at 5pm. As everyone said Holland were the better team and had also
a little bit more luck, that's football.
Re .881 Rob that was a very fair analysis.
-dave-
|
129.903 | predictable | DBSUK2::GRICE | Phil Grice DBS Sustaining Engineering | Thu Oct 14 1993 15:26 | 19 |
| A few comments about last night. The Koeman incident was interesting for a
number of reasons. The ref immediately headed off pointing to the penalty spot
but then looked over to the linesman. According to the tv the linesman also
said it was a penalty but the ref then seem to bow to Koeman's efforts at
pointing outside the box.
Now contrast that to the Walker foul in the first game between these two at
Wembley. Walker started his foul well outside the box but the guy fell over
inside. (Did Walker walk - I can't remember). Koeman seemed to get his yellow
card as an after thought by the ref.
Overall I'm not surprised. And at least I'll be able to watch the World Cup in
a relaxed aloof mood, watching the Irish (if they get there) get some more
interminable draws.:^) Thank God we don't have to qualify for the European
Championships.
I hope the Welsh get there
/phil
|
129.904 | | DBSUK2::GRICE | Phil Grice DBS Sustaining Engineering | Thu Oct 14 1993 15:27 | 4 |
| Oh and regards Seaman. Well even Brian More knew what he was going to do with
the ball and there was an awful lot of space on the left of the goal.
/phil
|
129.905 | | KERNEL::WITHALLG | Even Better Than The Real Thing | Thu Oct 14 1993 15:44 | 8 |
|
-1.
Yeh, and had he covered the left there would be even more space to
the right !. Somehow Seaman won't win this one.
Gazzer.
|
129.906 | Lee Blunt | YUPPY::ASHLEYSMITH | been in a daze for days | Thu Oct 14 1993 16:30 | 11 |
| Holland were the better side. Players such as Sinton and Palmer are
simply not upto this standard of football especially when Taylor
appears to play them in positions to which they are not accustomed.
Lee Sharpe was a complete embarrassment and I am pleased that people
will now realise what an overated player he is.
Looking forward to watching the Cricket next summer.
Andy
|
129.907 | | SIOG::HOWARD | | Thu Oct 14 1993 16:34 | 3 |
| The double save from Seaman has to rank alongside Banks' save against
Brazil 1970....
Amazing....
|
129.908 | | ARRODS::OHAGANB | Sky-high....6000 miles way | Thu Oct 14 1993 16:50 | 5 |
| No chance for Merson to show a World Cup Finals audience his brilliance
until 1998. Depressing that is.
barry.
|
129.909 | | SIOG::HOWARD | | Thu Oct 14 1993 17:09 | 2 |
| anyone care to post a few of the headlines from the British gutter
press....we all need cheering up
|
129.910 | Win the game and we were on the plane - SUN | PIECES::63585::PCDEFAULT | Place holder for NOTES | Thu Oct 14 1993 17:19 | 33 |
| The SUN says OUTRAGED Taylor fury as Killer
Koeman robs England on it's back page.
CHEATED OUT OF IT screams it's match report,
with Ref Sparks spot-kick fury as it's
sub-title.
The next page has 4 pictures showing WHY KOEMAN
SHOULD HAVE GONE.
The next page says FIFA MUST PROBE THIS SCANDAL REF
by John Sadler on the night the whole world fell in
on England.
There is also a HOW WE RATED section, with marks out of ten.
Seaman 6
Parker 6
Dorigo 6
Palmer 5
Adams 8
Pallister 8
Platt 7
Merson 7
Shearer 6
Sharpe 6
Ince 7
Sinton 6
Wright 6
Not that I have seen The Sun of course!!
Chris.
|
129.911 | Whipping boys qualify -but not us | SUTRA::WARD | | Thu Oct 14 1993 17:37 | 9 |
| The real shame of all this is that a lot of lesser teams from odd parts
of the world will go to the US, more or less to be whipping boys,
whilst several of the worlds/Europe's better sides might languish at
home. What price the European Championship being of better quality than
the world cup?
PS Taylor must go - but who would replace him??
Paul
|
129.912 | No justice in the world | OSLACT::HENRIKW | Making the most of misery | Thu Oct 14 1993 17:48 | 6 |
| >>The real shame of all this is that a lot of lesser teams from odd parts
>>of the world will go to the US, more or less to be whipping boys,
>>whilst several of the worlds/Europe's better sides might languish at
>>home.
I know how you feel. We used to be bad losers, too. ;^)
|
129.913 | Well done Holland and good luck in the states. | ECCGY4::HAIGH | If voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it. | Thu Oct 14 1993 18:01 | 26 |
|
The officials were bad, apart from Rijkards disallowed goal, most
of the bad decisions seemed to go against England. I'm suprprised that
no one has mentioned the atrocious tackle from the second Koeman on
Parker 60 seconds after the first Koeman should have been sent off.
What surprises me is that seeing the Bundesliga every week, the refs
hand out yellow and red cards like they're going out of fashion. Yet
last night he seemed to have forgotten the red card entirely.
Also the free kick that England got out of the Koeman/Platt
incident, was a farce as the dutch defender was about 3 yards from the
ball as it was taken. Koeman got to retake the free kick at the other
end when Ince ran out and we all know what happened after that!
Seaman may have made a good save or two, but was at least partially
to blame for both of Hollands goals. It would be unfair to blame him
alone though.
All that aside, Holland were the better team and deserved their
win. England failed to qualify because of the result at Wembley. Taylor
must now go, and I bet he'll want no more of the ridicule heaped on him
by the sad English media.
It must be a hollow victory for the Dutch manager as he will be
replaced in the states by J.C., who seems to have been sent from
heaven!
|
129.914 | | GALVIA::SPAIN | signed long gary(); | Thu Oct 14 1993 18:41 | 11 |
|
Saw the 2nd half in a Dublin pub. Great game. I thought the better
side won but the referee was a disgrace. Koeman should have walked.
Holland still have to draw in Poland. That's not a foregone conclusion
but the Dutch should qualify now.
England drew at hoem to Holland and Norway, lost away to both sides and
can have no complaints.
Gary.
|
129.915 | moved for your convenience | GALVIA::SPAIN | signed long gary(); | Thu Oct 14 1993 20:59 | 20 |
| <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 325.0 Start all over again No replies
REDARO::WLC_IMPROV1 14 lines 14-OCT-1993 16:54
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I watched the Holland V England football match last night and was
absolutely gutted with the final result.I am sure there are plenty
of other people feeling the same way,who just cannot believe it.
Ronald Koeman should have definetly been sent off for pulling David
Platt down and we were so unlucky not to score after hitting the
post twice and having one saved off the line.This game will be
talked about for some time to come for what might and should of been.
We have to look to a new manager who can DO the job and build a good
foundation and produce a winning team for the World Cup in 1998.
All comments welcome,
regards,
M.m.
|
129.916 | Koemans - Man of the Match | COKPIT::DSMITH | Gazza's my hero...NOT!!!!! | Thu Oct 14 1993 21:55 | 42 |
|
re .805
" A victory for justice, and England climb righteously back into the top
3 international teams."
Oh dear, how sad, too bad!!!
re .812
"the thought of World Cup Football without us taking part doesnt bare
thinking about"
Believe me, the thought of WC football without England is very
comforting indeed. No more nationalistic crap from the Beeb and the
press. Ecstasy!!!
re .893
"Koeman should be shot at the very least"
Not Koemans fault, he did what 99% of footballers would have done in
a similar position. What the ref did or didn't do is nowt to do with
Koemans.
re .911
"The real shame of all this is that a lot of lesser teams from odd
parts of the world will go to the US, more or less to be whipping boys"
That's why it's called the WORLD CUP. Teams from all over the world
are invited to try and qualify. Why should the "big boys" qualify all
the time. By the way, would you include the USA as whipping boys?
I don't know what all the aggro about Koemans tackle is about. The ref
made a bad decision, he should of booked Platty for throwing himself
to the ground as if he had been shot. Never even a free kick!!!
Face up to it guys, you were beaten fair and square. Sometimes
decisions go for you, sometimes against you. That's life.
Danny.
|
129.917 | Stop Moaning. | PAKORA::AMILLAR | And some late news just in... | Thu Oct 14 1993 23:57 | 17 |
|
I thought Platt over reacted to his jersey being pulled, and dived into
the box. He should have been booked for it.
When the Dutch player ran from the wall, it was after much running
about by English forwards, although it was before the ball was kicked.
The other incident at the Dutch free kick was more blatant. The English
defender ran out just when the Dutchman started his run, and without
any distractions from the other Dutch players.
As for the violence, and talking about the innocent being lifted along
with the guilty, I do not blame the Dutch authorities for what they
did. They decided to stop the destruction of their cities before it
started, and given the previous record of the English fans, I say it
was the right thing to do.
Archie
|
129.918 | | PAKORA::AMCARTHUR | andrew 789 8225 | Fri Oct 15 1993 00:56 | 22 |
| RE -1
Quite correct Archie...
Dont allow the hooligans ( no matter where they come from ) to do what
they want. This behaviour by so called football fans has went on too
long. Personally, I would have banned England from the Finals.There
fans ( although not only their fans are guilty ) cannot be trusted.
Even if there were a hard core of thugs out there causing
havoc,something had to be done. Well done the Dutch police.
Its just a pity that real football fans end up tarred with the same
brush.
Did anyone hear how harsh the sentences were on the thugs that were in
court today ?
As for the football.....England were beaten by a better team. The
management should have taken defeat with dignity instead of their
pathetic outbursts after the match. Taylor really is a sad.
|
129.919 | Additional info | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Fri Oct 15 1993 12:35 | 26 |
| Perhaps nice to know, some reactions from the ref ( saw it in my
newspaper this morning) :
Rijkaards goal : Took over the reaction of the linesman
Koeman : For sure no red card. There was not a goalthreatening
situation because there was another dutch player (?) around.
Penalty ? Was my first reaction but the linesman corrected me.
Wouters ( who else...) ran to fast out ? No way. There was enough space
to shoot !
Penalty on the other side ? Could be.
Was taken over because Ince was running when Koeman was running. The
distance during the shot was to close !
My performance ? Reasonably well for such an important match.
For so far mr Asschenbacher ( and not me !).
Reaction dutch police : there was a rule used, like Ton said before
that everyone could been arrested that looked 'ready for vandalism.'
That means that the individual policeman can arrest anyone he/she
dislikes and that can lead to doubtfull decisions. I don't know if that
is a solution to hooliganism. More a move to a sort of police-state....
Punishement for arrested ? Seven were put to trial yesterday ; one
free, the other six got a small 'fee' before being released. Some are
in english jail and dutch fans will be trialed in january.....
Conclusion ; trials were fast but not very hard on them......
|
129.920 | Their soft under that hard exterior shell... | GAOV10::MURPHY | | Fri Oct 15 1993 13:18 | 16 |
| I was watching ITV last night.On it they were showing the English
hooligans arriving back to England where they had to go through a
gauntlet of reporters and cameramen.Most of them were covering their
faces with their jackets but I was amazed that their were men in their
(what looked to me)in their sixties and Women arrested also.
But lets spare a thought for one English hooligan about six foot tall
with a shaved head and as mean looking as they come who broke down into
tears when the cameras were filming him.(maybe he just heard the result
from Amsterdam)
Regards,
Anthony.
"
-
|
129.921 | Count me in for devolution! | FORTY2::ETHERIDGE | Oooh! Turned out nice again. | Fri Oct 15 1993 13:36 | 13 |
129.922 | England fans, pathetic... | BCFI::SCHOTT | Mickey Mouse is a rat | Fri Oct 15 1993 14:21 | 35 |
|
Pathetic...
In clear memory the notes and comments before this group started off:
England-only-next-to-god and Holland go to USA without problems, Poland
can be an upset, to pick a point, but the rest are only C-nations...
You thought Norway would roll over and play dead as soon as the big
team in this world would show up.
As it turned out Norway was no puppy but rather a wolf who bit your
a***s. Now you weep like sissies about bad referies and unfair play...
Pathetic...
re .911
Your "wipping boys", is that the likes of Norway, Cameroon and USA?
Ten times out of ten I prefer those before a bunch of defenders.
Come now, weeping about other teams taking your place...
It is a _world_ cup and we will do fine without England.
As to the "fans". If I were a _real_ fan I would just not be seen with
those thugs - thus not arrested. If you go with them you are one
yourself. Dump them in a cell and throw away the key.
*** Congrats to Norway, you deserve to go to the finals ***
I for sure will not go about as like Sweden has already won the finals.
We have qualified and thats fine. If we do well in US thats better, if
not - well there are always other teams to enjoy, like Brasil,
Cameroon, Norway, Denmark and France (hope they go through).
I enjoy _fotball_.
Hermann
(sorry for this burst-out, it won't happen again) ;-)
|
129.923 | | SUBURB::WAITEG | SIMPLY THE BEST | Fri Oct 15 1993 14:25 | 8 |
| Re 922
So if you go abroad to watch England that makes you a holigan does
it??? You are a pratt who is just trying to get a reaction.
I thank you all
Gary
|
129.924 | Reasoned argument. Sod it, bring out the xenophobia. | FORTY2::ETHERIDGE | Oooh! Turned out nice again. | Fri Oct 15 1993 14:31 | 6 |
129.925 | Holigans, yuck! | BCFI::SCHOTT | Mickey Mouse is a rat | Fri Oct 15 1993 14:32 | 7 |
|
re .923
If I go abroad to watch England, I go abroad to watch England, not to
run around with holigans.
Hermann
|
129.926 | | IMAPC::MURRAY | | Fri Oct 15 1993 14:40 | 6 |
|
re.923
which I think he got Gary :)
Paul
|
129.927 | Norway-Enjoy it while it lasts :-) | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Fri Oct 15 1993 14:40 | 11 |
| Norway wont even get past the first round at the World Cup....
....as always it'll be either Germany,Brazil,Italy,Argentina or Holland
that will win it...
.....small nations can not have the strength in depth in case of
injuries etc etc...
....Denmark last year was the exception that proves the rule.
-Dom
|
129.928 | People still thinks we live in the past... | BCFI::PIHLSTROM | The bowsprit looks forward | Fri Oct 15 1993 15:05 | 15 |
|
Hmmm...
What Cameroon did in the last WC I think Norway can do in this WC.
And even go to a final against...well it doesnt matter!
(If it not are Sweden of course..!)
Where is "Drillos" Nobelprice..?
The Swedish Swagman
P.S (The World is DYNAMIC not static!)
|
129.929 | ITS ALL OVER | PEKING::WELLERM | | Fri Oct 15 1993 16:43 | 25 |
|
Back to the hooligan issue.....I'm not making exscuses for English
supporters..(a term I use lightly).but how the Dutch supporters
manage to get flares (not the trouser type) into the ground is
beyond me..and manage to throw them onto the pitch..??
As for the football..England were beaten by the better side..Seamen
was a fault for both goals..our tactics were all wrong..again..We
expected everything to go down the wings..it didn't..both goals and
the one not given came from attacking the down the middle..all of
Berkamps attacks came straight down the middle...Proving my point
that our centre backs are to simular..both are ball winners doing
the same job..saying that Tony Adams's form has been the best thing
that has come out of these games....we were so pre-occupied with
looking for the wingers it left gapping holes through the middle which
someone with Berkamps speed and thought loved..our centre backs aren't
the quickest things on two legs so why not play Adams winning the ball
and walker picking up peices behind him..I'm a Man Utd supporter and
rate Pallister highly but I still thinks he lacks something when it
comes to Internationals...Another thing did someone tell Sharpe the
wrong tactics when it came to corners and free kicks..?? at corners
he was knocking them in at near post when everyone was far..???
and our free kicks into the box were terrible..10 mins to go we send
both our centre backs up and what does Sharpe do ..he hardly reaches
the box and gives the ball away..well thats that off my chest
|
129.930 | Goodbye Turnip Head!!! | PEKING::MCKIEN | NICK | Fri Oct 15 1993 17:01 | 6 |
|
On the Lunchtime news; Poland will field a YOUNG Inexperienced Side
against Holland. This is the start of thier preperation for the next
European Championships.
NICK.
|
129.931 | WHAT !!! | CHEFS::HARRISR | Great things are afoot! | Fri Oct 15 1993 17:38 | 9 |
| Surely Fifa will do something about that. Poland will not field their
strongest side, thus depriving England of even the smallest chance of
qualifying. If a club team fields an under strength team in the league,
in preperation for a cup game, then the FA throw the book at them. So
what is the difference ? Poland have basically rolled over and said
that Holland can go to the US and sod England. Well, we're glad we know
who our friends sre.
A rather irate Rich.
|
129.932 | | BUSSTP::DREES | | Fri Oct 15 1993 18:08 | 11 |
|
Re.last
It's a sad reflection on English football when you have to rely on
what Poland might or might not do to send you to the W.C.
As an earlier noter pointed out England managed to draw at home to
Holland and Norway and lose both away ties. That is why there NOT
going to the W.C.
Del
|
129.933 | Picture this... | BCFI::PIHLSTROM | The bowsprit looks forward | Fri Oct 15 1993 18:45 | 10 |
129.934 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Come the glorious day | Fri Oct 15 1993 19:17 | 5 |
| Pardon?
You and reality aren't close friends are you?
Mike
|
129.935 | Pole Vaults | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Fri Oct 15 1993 19:32 | 3 |
| The Poles must have been suffering from Amnesia in '73 then....;-)
-Dom
|
129.936 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Fri Oct 15 1993 20:10 | 19 |
129.937 | Stranger things have happend! | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Sun Oct 17 1993 20:15 | 7 |
| ...well I wonder what they said....?
Anyway the big irony will be that Poland beat Holland 1-0 and we
only beat San Marino 6-0 and Holland still go through...........
.......Graham Taylor leaves the country for ever...:-)
-Dom
|
129.938 | Another kick in the teeth ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Wed Oct 20 1993 12:48 | 13 |
|
F.I.F.A
"After analysing the performance of Karl-Josef Assenmacher...
the F.I.F.A referees committe has decided to replace (him)
with Hellmut Krug of Germany for the game between Belgium
and the Czech and Slovakian republics on November 17"
It only gets worse !!!!!
Will Taylor lose all dignity and beg for a replay ? I wonder ...
Peter(An Impartial Celt)
|
129.939 | was he THAT bad | NEWOA::FIDO_T | Conation is the key | Wed Oct 20 1993 13:26 | 8 |
| Apart from the truly awful mistake of failing to send Koemans off, did
Assenmacher really have such a bad game ? He made some other mistakes
such as booking Ince for encroachment at a free kick when the Dutch had
got away with it earlier, but overall I would have said that he wasn't
too bad. Disallowing Rijkaard's goal was based on a linesman's decision
and so he can't be blamed for that.
Terry
|
129.940 | He's either good enough, or he is'nt.... | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Wed Oct 20 1993 14:15 | 19 |
|
I think the call for a replay is going to happen (although I personally
don't feel it should or will take place) because FIFA have now left
themselves wide open to it......
Think about it logically (if that's possible in this note :^) ).....
By removing Herr Assenmacher (how could he fail to make an Ass of
things with a name like that) FIFA have declared he is unfit to ref at
this level.
By the same token he could not have been fit to ref the Holland vs
England game.
The result is therefore null and void and the game should be replayed.
Before the flames fly thick and fast, this is *not* my opinion, just a
simple analysis of the facts. How do these people in FIFA get their
jobs????
Cheers.....Ned
|
129.941 | | GYMAC::DCASSIDY | | Wed Oct 20 1993 14:20 | 9 |
|
This is something that is I'm afraid going to happen more an more...
we already had Zimbabwe and Eqypt ...looking like Morrocco v Zambia..
and now England v Holland...
Dezzz.
|
129.942 | But do you want a replay ? | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Wed Oct 20 1993 14:31 | 15 |
|
re: .940
That's fair comment !
I don't know but if England do appeal they should & could very well
get a replay. The logic in .940 makes perfect sense.
And just when you thought Taylor was gone, he gets another
bite at the cherry.
Like they say, you can't get rid of a bad thing !
The next day or two should be interesting.
Peter(An Impartial Celt).
|
129.943 | A replay is highly unlikely... | PAVONE::TURNER | | Wed Oct 20 1993 14:32 | 27 |
| re: .939
I rather fear that things don't work like that in FIFA-land.
A precedent: the European Cup Winners' Cup final in 1973. Leeds lost
1-0 to AC Milan after dominating the match for 86 minutes. The referee
(a Greek) made some astounding decisions (e.g. he booked Paul Madeley
for time-wasting in the dying minutes when Leeds were losing 1-0!!)
UEFA spent about six months investigating the referee, so convinced
were they that he'd taken bribes from AC Milan (Italian football's
reputation back in the seventies was shady to say the least). Well,
they couldn't pin anything on him (shat a surprise!), but they banned
him anyway from ever refereeing another international football match.
And AC Milan continued guzzling champagne from the cup. Inter Milan
fans still delight in using this game (together with the Marseille
floodlight scandal) to put down AC Milan as a club.
Unless opposing fans pelt your goalkeeper with grapeshot while he's
facing a penalty, you've got a fat chance of getting the game replayed.
In other words, suspending a ref is no admission of guilt on FIFA's
part.
Dom
|
129.944 | How do we prevent these "International Incidents"? | BERN02::GOODEJ | | Wed Oct 20 1993 15:25 | 126 |
129.945 | | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Wed Oct 20 1993 15:41 | 6 |
|
re: last
Great note. Mail it to to FIFA.
Peter(An Impartial Celt).
|
129.946 | Food for thought. | PAVONE::TURNER | | Wed Oct 20 1993 16:57 | 37 |
| re: .944
Yep, a lot of good things in that note. I quite agree with the view
that defenders have got to be punished to the point that they'll think
twice about stopping attackers by foul means.
And yet, the legislation continues to favour the defending team.
Perhaps this should be carried on in another note, but it always makes
me roar when referees take a inconsistent view of pushing by
attackers vs. pushing by defenders. As for the commitment to
"protecting" goalkeeper when he goes up for a high ball with a forward!
If you're worried about getting a knee in the back/ribs when you're
jumping with arms outstretched, then go up with your head like everyone
else! In other words, goalkeepers enjoy enough protection as it is.
>Surely the use of TV cameras and action-replay equipment to allow
>one or more referees to monitor games has to be sanctioned soon. The
>USA World Cup would be an ideal place to start. The improvement in
>off-side decisions alone has to be worth it - Rijkaard was yards on
>side!
Agreed. This equipment has got to be the next innovation in the game.
That's if we really want progress. At present, the International
Cricket Federation seems to be a more progressive organization than
FIFA!
>It pisses me off to see cheating go unpunished regardless of who are
>the guilty party and victim. It pisses me off even more to hear people
>gloating when their team gets away with it - they would be the first to
>whinge if their team was the victim.
Just cast your mind back (those who can) to the reaction of the Oirish
in this conference when Holland (again!) eliminated Eire from the 1988
European Championships with a disputed offside goal from Kieft. The
Gaelic equivalent of "we wuz robbed" featured in every note for about
the next month!
Dom
|
129.947 | Blame the Irish! | SIOG::FITZPATRICK | | Wed Oct 20 1993 17:16 | 23 |
| >> Just cast your mind back (those who can) to the reaction of the Oirish
>> in this conference when Holland (again!) eliminated Eire from the 1988
>> European Championships with a disputed offside goal from Kieft. The
>> Gaelic equivalent of "we wuz robbed" featured in every note for about
>> the next month!
Dom,
Definitely NOT true. You have a very fertile imagination to fuel your
National Front racist fervour.
For the record, most Irish people accepted this defeat in good
spirit. True, there was disappointment that we went out to an off-side
goal, but most reasonable people (we are, over here) accepted that
Holland were the better side on the day.
Most Irish people cheered for Holland in the subsequent matches.
Everybody really enjoyed that Championship and there were NO
recriminations.
After all, we won the match that mattered to us.
Michael.
|
129.948 | | SIOG::HOWARD | | Wed Oct 20 1993 17:42 | 1 |
| well said that man
|
129.949 | | NEWOA::FIDO_T | Conation is the key | Wed Oct 20 1993 17:49 | 16 |
| Re the use of cameras to help the referee make decisions :
The reason that cameras can be used in cricket and US Football is that
these games have a natural break ( i.e. the ball becomes dead ) and so
there is time to review decisions.
In football, this is not the case, so there isn't always time to review
the decision. Take the case of a shot which hits the bar and
does/doesn't cross the line ( a la 1966 World Cup final ) and then the
defence clears it upfield and scores on the breakaway. Unless the
referee blows as the ball does/doesn't cross the line ( to say "I'm not
sure" ? ), the game will continue. If he blows and the replay shows
that it din't cross the line, how is the game restarted ? Is it a goal
to the other side ?
Terry
|
129.950 | Remember? | PAVONE::TURNER | | Wed Oct 20 1993 17:53 | 21 |
| re: .947, .948
>Definitely NOT true. You have a very fertile imagination to fuel your
>National Front racist fervour.
First of all, I think the National Front/BNP is a *despicable*
organization. An apology would be nice, but I don't expect one.
Secondly, I remember that period as though it were yesterday - and
whingeing was the order of the day. I also remember it because I too
thought the goal was offside and allegations pointed to a political
FIFA decision designed to ensure Holland's place in the semi-finals (a
nation with more "pulling" power) rather than Ireland's.
And while we're on the subject, I have strong Irish roots myself. I'm
simply disappointed at the provocative/arrogant/racist views of many
fully-fledged Irish noters in this conference whenrever England are
concerned.
Clear?
Dom
|
129.951 | Enough already ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Wed Oct 20 1993 18:02 | 4 |
|
Here we go again. Just give it a bloody rest !
Peter(An Impartial Celt)
|
129.952 | Irish can dish it out, but can't take it!! | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Wed Oct 20 1993 18:22 | 5 |
|
Yeh, you know how sensitive the Irish are.....
Neil...
|
129.953 | | CLADA::DODONNELL | Nothing personal.It's just business. | Wed Oct 20 1993 18:32 | 7 |
|
Well of course we claimed "we wuz robbed" because we were robbed. But
there was none of the whinging and moaning that some of you are doing.
And Charlton didn't come across afterwards as a pathetic, whinging
idiot like Taylor.
Denis.
|
129.954 | Loads of Shi*e Talk | ESSB::BLONG | UNITED Premier League CHAMPIONS 1993 | Wed Oct 20 1993 18:43 | 4 |
129.955 | | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Wed Oct 20 1993 18:44 | 9 |
|
Taylor's an idiot, but lets face it, his job was on line and now could
face the sack because of a diabolical mistake by an offcial who wasn't
up to job. I'm sure anyone faced with this possibillity would have
acted in simiular manor. Then again if your Irish or Scottish you
would have gone down the pub had a few pints and forgot about it.
BOLLOCKS!!!
NEIL..
|
129.956 | Time will tell | UBOHUB::MCKEAVENEYJ | And then there were none... | Wed Oct 20 1993 18:45 | 10 |
129.957 | Yep, you wuz robbed. Sure. | PAVONE::TURNER | | Wed Oct 20 1993 18:55 | 17 |
| re: .953
>Well of course we claimed "we wuz robbed" because we were robbed. But
>there was none of the whinging and moaning that some of you are doing.
>And Charlton didn't come across afterwards as a pathetic, whinging
>idiot like Taylor.
Yeh, I guess that says it all really.
Rule 1: don't say *anything* negative about the Irish (unless you want to
be accused of having National Front sympathies in a public notesfile by
someone who's never set eyes on you before).
Personally, I think Platt should have been sent off for diving. Now
where's my camel?
Dom
|
129.958 | Dom you sound sad man.... | KBOMFG::TANNER | U2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!! | Wed Oct 20 1993 19:21 | 14 |
|
Dom I thinks its natural that we (Irish) folks were upset that Holland went
on to qualify for the Euro 88 semis with an offside goal. But if we were still
bitching about it (as you say ) a month later then tell me why all the Irish
(a word you have problems spelling) fans at the final supported the Dutch???
This all happened 5 years ago and it doesn't belong in this topic. Face it Dom
Holland beat ye because they were the better team, just like the Spanish were
better than Ireland.
Re .952 Neil You really wonder why your compared to Mr Barefield!!!!!!!!!!!!
-dave-
|
129.959 | don't...you'll make me cry.. | BUSSTP::DREES | | Wed Oct 20 1993 19:22 | 19 |
|
The sob stories keep coming and coming.....
Unlucky or not, the main reason England won't be going to the W.C is
because they are simply not good enough. It's about time the English
supporters in this topic realised that simple fact.
You just don't have enough class players to do the biz at international
level. (Maybe Denis Wise would have made a difference...NOT!)
You lost in Holland and Norway and you couldn't beat either of these
sides at home. So instead of moaning and blaming the ref it's about
time you faced the fact that you just don't have the ability at
International level.
Del.
|
129.960 | | CLADA::DODONNELL | Nothing personal.It's just business. | Wed Oct 20 1993 19:35 | 12 |
|
Re .957
>Rule 1: don't say *anything* negative about the Irish (unless you want
>to accused of having National Front sympathies in a public notesfile
>someone who's never set eyes on you before).
Eh? I never accused you of having National Front sympathies. I may have
accused you of being a whinger but not of having National Front
sympathies. ;').
Denis.
|
129.961 | | PAVONE::TURNER | | Wed Oct 20 1993 19:37 | 30 |
| re: .958
>Dom, you sound sad man
Didn't get this at first - I presume you're using sound as a verb, not
as an adjective? Anyway, the truth is "no, not really". I was
disappointed when I saw the result come up on teletext here in Italy
(the match was televised in crypted form and due to interference I
couldn't even see that!), but I've realised by now that Holland are our
bogey team.
And in any case, I think England, Holland and Ireland would all be
annihilated by the likes of Columbia at the moment. I don't think
England are a *worse* team than Holland, but I wouldn't have put
sixpence on the current England team getting past the first round of a
tournament not held at Wembley.
>This all happened 5 years ago and it doesn't belong in this topic.
>Face it Dom Holland beat ye because they were the better team, just
>like the Spanish were better than Ireland.
Didn't see the game, so can't comment. Possibly, you're right. But the
theory "we won so we deserved to qualify" doesn't always hold true;
just ask the inhabitants of Cameroon after the last World Cup!
As for the '88 Euro championships, there are some short memories round
here! Besides, the Dutch didn't *cheat* any more than Geoff Hurst did
in '66; the referee/linesmen just made a bad decision. So you would
have been right to support them in the final.
Dom
|
129.962 | No comparison!! | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Wed Oct 20 1993 19:37 | 14 |
|
We were beaten by a decision that totally changed the game. Ok,they were
technically better than us but did they deserve to win it..? England
created more goal scoring oppertunities( ok you need to take chances to
win games). This game was deceided by a Referee who wasn't up to the
challenge of a game so important...A draw would have been
suffient for England and thats the way the game was heading until
the Ref dropped the biggest boob of his life...Ireland were trounced
fair and square. England were beaten by a man who failed to carry out
the rules thats laid out in front of him.
Neil..
|
129.963 | | UBOHUB::MCKEAVENEYJ | And then there were none... | Wed Oct 20 1993 19:47 | 4 |
|
I think JACKANORY is a suitable word at this time.
|
129.964 | | PAVONE::TURNER | | Wed Oct 20 1993 19:50 | 14 |
| re: .957
>Eh? I never accused you of having National Front sympathies. I may have
>accused you of being a whinger but not of having National Front
>sympathies. ;').
My note didn't refer to you. It was aimed at the author of .947.
And any whingeing (sp?) I have done concerns the anti-English racket in
this conference - not a reaction to last Wednesday's game, about which I
didn't submit a single reply until yesterday (?).
By all means, check.
Dom
|
129.965 | Already one down..... | PAKORA::JOWENS | | Wed Oct 20 1993 20:06 | 11 |
| re 962.
What about the *diabolical* decision by the linesman? ie Giving the
Rikaard (sp) goal off-side. Did that just slip your mind that you
should have been one down anyway. No, I thought not!
Pass the rose tinted specs please.......8-)
John
|
129.966 | | GALVIA::SPAIN | signed long gary(); | Wed Oct 20 1993 20:16 | 5 |
|
Can you please clam down and stick to rational discussion. This is
getting hysterical.
Gary.
|
129.967 | swings & roundabouts | ESSB::CONNAIRE | | Wed Oct 20 1993 20:26 | 7 |
| Just curious, butfrom what I can gather, the only reason this German
referee is deemed "incompetent" is that he didn't send Koemans off?
I don't recall similar "rantings" when the referee in the corresponding
game at Wembley didn't send Des Walker to the line for the same
offence.
BC.
|
129.968 | Come on guys, lets just discuss football here. | BERN02::GOODEJ | | Wed Oct 20 1993 20:26 | 51 |
|
Re.949
You have a very valid point there Terry. I was discussing just
this over lunch today. Both codes of Rugby even have the edge over
football here because breaks are more frequent.
Clearly had there been a referee in the stand last Wednesday
Rijkaard's goal would have been given - he did put it in the net
and the TV angle showed he was a yard on side when the ball was
chipped to him. However, what of the case where the ref blows
for off-side <before> the attacker shoots, but the TV shows he
would have been on side?? Now his chance is gone! I for one am
not sure how to handle this and many other similar situations which
could arise. But I definitely believe that a ref with a TV monitor
could play a major part in improving the success rate, and therefore
the fairness, of decisions. Give it a trail is therefore my argument.
Re..recent replies
I think its pretty likely that most England fans are by now aware
that their side lost away to Norway and Holland and only managed to
draw at home. It also seems apparent (to me anyway) that Mr Taylor is
not well liked and never was (I for one couldn't believe his
appointment). As such, comments like "Ha ha your team lost, they were
crap and your manager's a whinger" have less to do with football and
more with the pathetic desire to "rub it in". Given that we're all
meant to be colleagues here, couldn't we keep the snide remarks out
and concentrate on discussing football.
I for one will be sad that England don't qualify because in a few
games they have looked exciting (eg. Holland & Poland at Wembley). On
the other hand Norway have deservedly mastered the group and a World
Cup with the skills of Roy, G???lit.... etc has to be exciting (IMO).
There always have to be losers, and sometimes its not easy to accept
defeat, esspecially where dubious decisions have been made. But I can
see no excuse for being a gloating winner. If the North win by a
disputed goal next month I would expect some whinging. I'll certainly
be doing some myself if Wales go out (after the very dubious free-kick
which let the Czechs equalise in the dying seconds....). But there's
no sence in calling the England fans a buch of whiners. I think its a
shame they were beaten in such a manner, and if I were a Dutch fan, I
would be glad to have qualified but not too proud of the way it was
done.
So, better that we discuss football and offer words of encouragement or
commiseration, but lets cut out the crap.
JBG
|
129.969 | re:965 WHAT! a pathetic thing to say.. | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Wed Oct 20 1993 20:31 | 10 |
|
re:965
NO, I haven't forgotton about that, but those type of decisions go on
weekin and weekout and with the referee not being the postion to see
the incident had to go by the linesman, the differance being, HE WAS IN
a position to deal with Keomans incident and bottled it. In return
ENGLAND are almost out of the World Cup...
Neil...with his rose tinted specs firmly on....
|
129.970 | Pax vobiscum (or whatever) | PAVONE::TURNER | | Wed Oct 20 1993 20:33 | 9 |
| re: .968
That's the second note posted by Mr. Goode today that I'd nominate for
the Note of the Year competition (assuming one exists). He's certainly
showing himself to be the most consistently good noter (no pun
intended!) if nothing else.
Dom
|
129.971 | D Walker - Red card! No question. | BERN02::GOODEJ | | Wed Oct 20 1993 20:43 | 22 |
|
Re .967/.969
My first reaction was "send him off". I think Des Walker was (he
seems to have gone off the biol lately) Englands best defender. But
his foul should definitely have got him sent off. No question. And I
would recommend more than a single match ban. Then such behaviour
would stop.
Some of you may have heard of a guy called Ringer. His put a late
tackle in on an opponent in an England v Wales Rugby international at
Twickers back in the early eighties. Although the TV showed that the
descision was harsh, he never played Rugby for Wales again. In fact his
"career" was effectively ended.
I don't recommend quite such harsh punishment (unless deliberate
intent to injure is proven), however, if we clamp down on the cheaters
and foulers the game will become simply a spectacle of speed and skill.
JBG
Ps. please keep up the flattery....
|
129.972 | Players really all crap? | HEART::DIDCOCK | | Wed Oct 20 1993 20:51 | 36 |
|
Firstly let me state I have no problem accepting that England are a
crap football team and are getting the results they deserve. (I wish it
were otherwise, but I accept it.)
One of the comments in an earlier note said words to the effect
that all the players are crap too. (The note pointing out that Wise
wouldn't have made any difference).
While they don't exactly show it in international colours, I'm
fairly impressed with at least the following: Pearce, Ince, R. Jones,
Gazza, Shearer, Ferdinand, Platt. In recent memory the following have
turned reasonable performances too: I. Wright, Walker... I'm sure others
will argue I could have included Sharpe, Adams etc - that's not the
point.
It seems to me other countries make more from less. This can come
down to a number of things:
1) Manager - popular theory - I'd like to see him go. (I'm a bit
concerned that we always end up blaming the manager. When did we last
have a respected manager? 1970? Actually IMO it's not since then that
England have performed CONSISTANTLY.)
2) The impact of the football league - coaching etc. Too boring to
enter into.
Finally are the England players actually worse then the Irish?
They (by and large) have the same club backgrounds. There can't be a
lot in it - over the full squads. If I had to stick my neck out I'd
say on paper England have the `better squad' - but Ireland play to
their potential better - both tactically and in terms of attitude.
I can't draw any conclusions - but I wanted to challenge the
statement that the players are all crap - I think some of them could
play international football if managed/handled right.
Cliff
|
129.973 | *:@) | KURMA::SWRIGHT | Beavis and Butthead | Wed Oct 20 1993 23:09 | 6 |
| It all sounds like sour grapes to me......
England are out so just accept it ..!!!
Boris de Ness.
|
129.974 | Techno techno techno | CHEFS::HARRISR | Great things are afoot! | Thu Oct 21 1993 12:24 | 15 |
| Here's a little idea. If technology is to be introduced into the game,
then why not have a patch sewn into the front of a players shirt, that
can be montitored, by a computer, and two people, one for each team,
hitting a button every time the ball is passed by a player on the team
they are watching. Then the computer can instantly say if a player was
offside, and sound either a hooter or send a message to the ref through
an earpiece. After match analysis could be made easy if the computer
can display positions at any time of the match, and run through. If a
transmitter can be put in the ball, then was the ball over the ine
decisions could be a thing of the past too.
Good huh, are the guys in research reading this?
Rich.
|
129.975 | This has gone on too long to be a typo | KIRKTN::MPEACOCK | | Thu Oct 21 1993 12:27 | 4 |
| Who is KoemanS? It's like Alan Sugar talking about Tottenham HotspurS
when he means to say Tottenham Hotspur or Spurs.
Mike
|
129.976 | | SIOG::FITZPATRICK | | Thu Oct 21 1993 12:42 | 23 |
|
>> First of all, I think the National Front/BNP is a *despicable*
>> organization. An apology would be nice, but I don't expect one.
Dom,
I have no problem apologising if I have said something unfair.
So, sorry, if National Front was too strong.
But, do review your notes. To me, at least, they do seem to always
contain some anti-Irish sentiment (maybe you'd refer to 'winding-up').
There is a difference between slagging off a team in their topic, for
a poor performance, over-expectation or whatever, and persistently
sniping at a race in all topics.
My comments were directed at you personally, no other noter.
After all, the topic was discussing the Holland England match. Why
bring Ireland, yet again, into it?
Michael.
(With apologies to all other noters for this BORING note. I reckon
it would be best to take any other correspondence off-line!).
|
129.977 | More techno... | KBOMFG::KOEPPE | Counting the days... | Thu Oct 21 1993 12:54 | 7 |
| RE .974
So I guess you could use the GPS
Global(l) Positioning System to track ball and players!
Eduard :-) :-)
|
129.978 | Sorry - I got a bit carried away ! | BERN01::BOLGER | Jerry Bolger. | Thu Oct 21 1993 13:58 | 77 |
| Re .976
I'm sure everyone is fully aware that we Irish are totally above
slagging off the English and their team at any (every) opportunity.
In fact, I can categorically state that we would never ever concoct a
slagging opportunity in order to "get our own back" when some of our
English colleagues (that's right we all work for the same company !)
come up with something original to slag off our team about !
As football supporters, I guess we should all be well used to having
our team slagged off (some more than others !). This naturally gives us
a chance to reciprocate (note that I didn't say retaliate, as that's a
red-card offence). In fact, I think, up to a point it plays an important
role in promoting the healthy rivalry which adds to the atmosphere on
the terraces (pop along to any derby match !).
So what's the point of all this rambling ? Well let's take an analogy:
Case 1 :
Mr. Chelsea says to Mr. QPR "Your team are a bunch of geriatrics !"
Mr. QPR replies "Yeah well, my team scored more goals last week
than your team's average IQ"
Case 2 :
Mr. Chelsea says to Mr. QPR "Your team are a bunch of geriatrics !"
Mr. QPR replies "I resent that racist remark and while we're on the
subject I for one think that active members of the
paramilitary wing of the Pan-European Pro Euthanasia
Peoples Organisation, should be banned from this
conference, so that normal God-fearing angelic
people like myself can talk s**t all day long."
The Analogy ?
Case 1 is IMHO a case of harmless Reciprocation, a bit like
scoring a goal from the resulting free kick !
Case 2 is, once again IMHO, a case of Retaliation, a bit like
borrowing the linesmans flag to stick it down your opponents
throat. This should naturally be followed by a "I don't know what I
did, but if it make you feel better, I'll apologise".
You're probably wondering if there is any point at all to this reply.
Basically, I use this conference to keep up to date on results, and
also to provide a bit of light relief from the hassles of the average
working day. I think it would be nice to leave all the confrontations
and ill-humoured bullshit to one-side when writing in this conference,
and stick to the entertaining, good-humoured, NON-PERSONAL abuse which
makes such a good diversion. Football is, after all, a SPORT. Why
can't noting be the same ?
Sorry if I stepped on any toes in this reply (although I can't see what
you're upset about). I deliberately left out the smile symbols, so that
if anyone finds anything too upsetting, they can assume it was meant as
a joke. (Hint: Sarcasm features quite strongly in the first paragraph!)
Jerry.
P.S. Just for the record I am not a member of any of the following:
Sinn Fein, IRA, UVF, National Front, PLO, DUP, UUP, Viinie Jones Fan
Club, BBC, RTE, etc. etc. ...........
|
129.979 | | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Thu Oct 21 1993 14:31 | 41 |
|
I dunno who said that the English players are *all* crap,
but they should look again. Most of the players play excellent football
for their clubs and all it would take is a decent manager to make them
realise their International potential.
Ian Wright is probably one of the best players/strikers in Europe ditto
for Shearer. The defense is probably not selected from the best on
offer but the best *are* there to be found. Gazza was a great player
and maybe still could be. Ince is a very good mid-fielder. There are
positions which could be filled by better players but at least the
players are available. The Engish league, from what I,ve seen this
season is getting close to being on par with the Italia league for
good entertaining football.
They need a good International team and a nuclear bomb dropped on FA
H.Q & Lillishall (Spell ?) ,in order for things to progress. Somebody
earlier suggested top class managers for all International levels . Great idea !
I want to see good football. I even want to see England qualify for and
win the world cup (when they play the type of football that deserves
it) England have never been the greatest team in the world. 1966 was
your greatest hour and you are rightly proud of it, but it is common
knowledge that it was a pretty woeful world cup appart from that.
I can't agree that the Irish will moan if we lose to N.Ireland. I think
we feel that it was all in our own hands at Landsdown and we blew it !
There weren't too many moans when we failed to qualify for the last
European championships. We had the opportunities, we were the best team
in our group and we gave it away. The same applies to England this time
around. You didn't take your chances and you're now paying the
price.That's tough !!!
Peter(An Impartial Celt)
P.S
1/
I for one don't find Dom Turners notes offensive.
2/
Mr. B Goode. Keep on noting !
|
129.980 | Even Germany will fail one day..... | GYMAC::DCASSIDY | | Mon Oct 25 1993 21:13 | 31 |
|
Well, well, well.....all very interesting stuff....
Just remember this one little snippet...Germany won the 1990 World Cup
which at the time seemed quite reasonable, as over the 4 weeks of the
Finals in Italy they were indeed the better team; I think the majority
of fair minded folk would agree there. What was the result in their
last qualifying match to get there ??? A skidded shot from Thomas
Haessler against Wales was all that got them to the finals in the first
place.
As somebody said..it's only a SPORT and in most cases this game is
decided on or CAN be decided on is the kick of a ball or the rub of the
green....
Let's just try to remember this. A Polish kick of the ball and the
expected England - San Marino whitewash may still get England there.
Look how England qualified for Euro '92...a kick of the ball in the
last 10 minutes......
This game is enjoyable to watch...so what if the results don't always
come. If they always did come then life would be very boring then
wouldn't it !!! Most Bayern Munich, Liverpool, PSV Eindhoven, Rangers
Real Madrid, Juventus fans are having a lean time of it over the last
few weeks, few months, few years....success is relative. If Ireland
don't qualify, for me it'll be a bit of a letdown just in the same way
as if none of England, Scotland, Wales qualify....I'll STILL watch the
World Cup though.....
Dezzz.
|
129.981 | Roxburgh for England .......... | BOOZER::RANKINE | | Tue Oct 26 1993 04:15 | 45 |
|
Well Ive waded through the 100+ notes put in here since the game, and
must say how pleased I was that someone mentioned that if Koeman should
have gone (and as a referee I say he should have..100% no doubt), then
so should have Walker at Wembley. As I recall he wasnt even cautioned.
So if Holland were 'cheats', then so were England....I dont recal
seeing many press articles mentioning the Des Walker incident other
than was it in/was it out the box etc..if in the event of 'multiple
incidents' you punish the most severe, so Walkers was a penalty.
The 'offside' goal was a farce, he was about 4 yds onside when the ball
was struck, and the linesman was ball watching..it is he who should
also be off the FIFA list.
The thing about football is that when a decision is made it affects the
remaining part of the game, such that should theoffside have been
allowed, the Koeman incident would not have occured.
In short, there were 2 bad decisions during the game, but the majority
of conversation seems to be concentrating on 1 incident...Koeman. The
suggestion that Platt dived is ludicrous, it was a definite foul,
failure to see or recognise that suggests severe eyesight problems.. so
you could be a ref !! :-)
Personaaly I thought Parker ahd a good game cos Roy is a very tricky
customer, and parker contained him very well.
Its a pity that the game was so full of incident cos its deflects from
soem real issues regarding improving UK players skills, the importance
of international football vs club football etc. The fact that Taylor
and others can hide behind the 'bad decision' and 'cheats' aspect of it
means that there may not be a drive to improving how the Uk approaches
football.
Well I hope this is seen as a non-racist note, doesnt offend anyone and
apologies for bringing a few things up again, but I did wade through
all the notes, and stored up a few responses.
Cheers
Paul
ps As I recall there were/are some friction between Germany and
Holland, so the suggestion that a German ref may be anti-english is a
bit straw clutching, no ??
|
129.982 | | ECCGY4::HAIGH | How do I feel about my shoes? | Tue Oct 26 1993 13:09 | 24 |
| Re .last, absolutely.
Added to that, Sky did one of their 'ask the fans' spots the other
day about the 'whether English football was in crisis?' I'd say that
around 75% of the answers contained the word 'Koeman'. That is simply
pathetic. Also Richard Keyes was talking to Monkou from Soton who had
been sent off a couple of games ago. His comment, 'the wrong Dutchman
was sent off'!
Sorry Dom, but at times the English do seem to be exceptional
whingers. And I for one am already sick of hearing about it. Holland
had a goal disallowed but everyone seems to have conveniantly
forgotten!
One thing from that last note;
>soem real issues regarding improving UK players skills, the importance
>of international football vs club football etc.
so just which is more important? I must honestly say, that to me
club football is more important than international football. What does
the panel think?
Steve
|
129.983 | Robbed in both games... | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Tue Oct 26 1993 14:47 | 8 |
|
All those going on about the Des Walker incident, have also conviently
forgot that the inital foul was outside the penalty area. So we was
robbed in that game too....
Anyway were not out of it yet...
Neil...
|
129.984 | Echo Echo | BREW11::RANKINE | | Tue Oct 26 1993 16:20 | 18 |
| re last ..
read my entry .981....In the event of multiple or continuing fouls, as
in the Des Walker incident, the referee will give the more severe
punishment. So he ahs a choice of giving a foul at the first incident,
ie out the box, or if the foul/pulling continued into the box, then he
gives a foul in the box..ie penalty. Im not entirely quoting the Laws
of the Game word for word, but if you want I can. Is this plain enough
for you ??
Re Club v International football,which is the most important. If we
want a successful international team, and the press and comments in
here seem to suggest that is the case, then this should be the
priority. If we dont give a stuff about success at international
level, then obviously club football is the most important. The clubs,
the FA and the fans are the ones who can make their minds up, but
ultimately is up to the FA to do something about it.
Paul
|
129.985 | Lost in the translation.... | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Tue Oct 26 1993 17:29 | 8 |
| re .982
>around 75% of the answers contained the word 'Koeman'
Maybe they were referring to themselves. Some kind Dutchman had
probably informed them that Koeman means Cowboy in Dutch.
Cheers....Ned
|
129.986 | | PAVONE::TURNER | | Tue Oct 26 1993 18:12 | 66 |
| re: .982
>Sorry Dom, but at times the English do seem to be exceptional
>whingers. And I for one am already sick of hearing about it. Holland
>had a goal disallowed but everyone seems to have conveniantly
>forgotten!
I didn't see the game so I can't really comment (although I have seen the
highlights about 59 times!). The only thing I'll go down as saying is that I
don't think Holland '93 are a patch on Holland '74 (quite frankly, I thought
they looked nothing short of disastrous at Wembley - Poland and Turkey played
better football for long periods). So I'm amazed that the general consensus is
"the better team are going through to US94"! Then again, I'm sure that Cameroon
(and maybe Belgium) were saying the same thing about England during the last
World Cup.
One good thing about living abroad is that it doesn't bring me into contact
with Jimmy Hill, the tabloids et al. In fact, I can be grateful for the fact
that I did a paper round every morning between the ages of 12 and 16. Apart
from making me late for school on numerous occasions, it cured any desire I may
have had to read the tabloids and I haven't given them the time of day since!
Then again, I refuse to believe that they reach the levels of the Gazzetta
dello Sport in Italy for biased reporting/whingeing. Sample headline after
Gentile had hacked Maradona's shins for 90 minutes in the 1982 World Cup:
"GENTILE - CHE GRINTA!" (= "Gentile - what grit/determination!")
Which brings me to the second part of your note:
>So just which is more important? I must honestly say, that to me
>club football is more important than international football. What does
>the panel think?
Living on the content, I *certainly* attach less importance to UK club
football. Remember, I'm now at the mercy of partizan Italians who'll be taking
the p*ss morning, noon and night for the next 18 months about England not
qualifying for the World Cup! Given that I've no opportunity to *see* the game,
I couldn't give a twopenny toss about the outcome of Southampton vs. Newcastle,
let alone Reading vs. Orient (sorry - that's the way it is!). But it makes my
blood boil if I hear a Man. Utd fan murmur that their main objective for the
1993/94 season is the Premier League (rather than the European Cup!). And
believe me, I supported Scotland (and just about everyone else) vs. England a
few years back, because I hated the way England played (I far preferred
watching Willie Johnston and Don Masson to Dave Watson and Brian Talbot!).
So to answer your question, no, I don't put club football before national
football. But I realise that as far as England (Britain) is concerned, mine is
the minority view. The only time I've ever seen England play was against
Belgium in the World Cup. I was surrounded by Belgium fans speaking
incomprehensible Flemish, but even I could appreciate their perplexity at some
of the chants from the England "faithful" ("Mansfield boys, we are here!"). It
reminded me of the popular cry at Wembley a few years back: "We all agree, Rixy
is better than Hoddle!"
And this issue has got to be worthy of its own topic!
Dom
P.S I can also remember that we used to save time picking sides for the
breaktime kickabout at school, by dividing the class into Leeds and Chelsea
supporters (this was c.1970, long sideburns, flared trousers and the rest!). It
was a pretty straight split 50-50 (and believe it or not, I went to school in
Brighton!), but *no one* gave a monkey's about England's fortunes in Mexico in
after that F.A. Cup Final between Chelsea and Leeds!!
Dom
|
129.987 | Look at it this way | CHEFS::HARRISR | Goosenargh! | Tue Oct 26 1993 18:43 | 19 |
| Lets face facts here.
1/ Holland should have been one goal up. Fine no quibbles about that.
2/ Koeman should, no arguing have been sent off.
3/ England probably should have had a penalty so one all. If not then
the wall for the free kick should have come under the same scrutiny
as the Dutch free kick.
4/ At either 1-0 or 1-1 I would have fancied Englands chances against
ten men. Koeman would not have been there to score the free kick,
and we probably would have won.
5/ Splatt should have been booked for the dive, even though it was a
foul.
Rich.
|
129.988 | It's not just bad refereeing | GALVIA::SPAIN | signed long gary(); | Tue Oct 26 1993 20:53 | 24 |
|
2 weeks on and we're still debating the game.
Any of the incidents mentioned could have changed the course of the
entire game. Had Rijkaard's goal been allowed it would have been a
different match. Had Koeman been sent off it would have been a
different match. On the 90 minutes I thought Holland deserved to win
but both sides played very well.
England will finish with 13 points from 10 games. It wasn't just the
Dutch game that cost them qualification. Failure to win at home to
Holland and Norway made qualification much more difficult. England
could have won both games and were perhaps unlucky. Then they were
lucky to draw in Poland. Holland were unlucky to only draw at home to
Norway.
Over the past 13 months Norway have been by far the best side in the
group. Holland and England struggled. Holland came good just in time
and appear to have won a reprieve.
Holland should qualify now. I actually think they'll do well - much
better than Norway.
Gary.
|
129.989 | Blaming someone is easier than fixing it | BREW11::RANKINE | | Wed Oct 27 1993 14:30 | 37 |
| Totally agree Gary.
One point I was trying to make that, assuming England dont qualify (and its
not all over yet), when people came to analise the reasons for the failure
they will perhaps start to look for scapegoats eg Taylor, the ref fir
the Holland game etc. Having found the scapegoats, blamed them, and
actioned on them eg sack Taylor, write ti FIFA about the ref etc. they
will then do nothing. OK they will appoint a new manager...Keegan,
Atkinson, whoever... but things wont really change.
Personnally I feel that some radical changes are needed to be made in
order to ensure that the British countries can compete internationally
in future. eg reduction of games in a season, more time together as a
squad, skills improvement program at school level, coaching which
involves playing with a football more than at present.
We (Britain) can do it - our clubs have been successful in the past and
have played some excellent football while doing it. I recall a friend
of mine spending a week with Liverpool, who was amazed by the amount of
time that they trained using the ball... this is not hte case with a
lot of clubs at present. What England are particularly good at is
the 'organising' of a team, as is Big Jack with his 'Irish' team
(recent results excepted), where the team performs, even though the
quality of the individuals may not be the best. Scotland used to have
some quality individual p[layers, but poor organisation as a team, and
so they never did well. Andy roxburgh (recent results excepted)
managed to get a bunch of average players playing well as a unit eg
Euro championship. To me acombination of the organisational strength
of the English, mixed with a drive to increase individual skill and
technique, would in the long run eg 10 years, give England an
international team that can compete at the highest level.
To carry on at present will only result in the continuing downward
slide towards averageness...hey who knows they may end up as bad as
Scotland !!
Paul
|
129.990 | | ECCGY4::HAIGH | How do I feel about my shoes? | Wed Oct 27 1993 15:04 | 21 |
|
Re .986 and Doms reply.
Maybe you are not aware but I also live abroad. I live in Munich
(mostly) and have for eight years. The only way I get to see English
club football is on ths Sky Satellite which some pubs here have. This
is only a recent occurence as up until 2 years ago Sky had no league
football.
Even then I was far more interested in the league than the English
national team, this means that I don't really mind if England lose
as long as City win, I know supporters of other clubs who fell the same
way, I also know people who totally disagree. The league goes on for 8
months and England 'play' occasionally.
Don't get me wrong, I would rather England won, but if they don't
I'm fairly phlegmatic about it. (Maybe because in the last 20 years
I've got used to it.) Strangely enough Germans don't tend to extract
the Michael like your Italian colleagues do.
Steve
|
129.991 | How about this idea...... | BERN02::GOODEJ | | Wed Oct 27 1993 16:31 | 49 |
|
Re .989
I quite agree that some radical changes are required. I never
believed that Talyor was the right man for the job so I hope they sack
him anyway. Regardless of who replaces him, there needs to be some
basic changes acroos the board in English football.
There are clearly too many games being played at the top levels.
I have been thinking of a possible solution which is this:
1) Remove 3 (possibly 4) teams from the premier league. This will
immediately free up 6 (or 8) fixtures for each club.
2) Scrap all league games for a month in winter - I would recommend
January since the weather is anyway at its most inclement.
3) Now allow the England manager to have a squad of 30 players or so
for the whole month to train.
4) Re-introduce the old "home" international series to be played on
the last three weekends of the break. This allows the manager to
try out his squad.
Advantages:
This system would give the England manager the opportunity to
really build a team which have played together.
The top players will play less league games.
The club groundsmen will have a month to nurse their pitches back to
health.
Disadvantages:
Clubs will lose gate reciepts because of fewer games. These could be
offset somewhat with TV royalties from the home international games??
Here in Switzerland the league breaks oof for 3 or 4 months in
winter. Of course the weather plays a bigger part here. Still, I think
the English game could benefit from a winter break. Its a question of
reducing the size of the league again!
JBG
|
129.992 | Now you did.... | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Come the glorious day | Wed Oct 27 1993 16:55 | 3 |
| >>>>I never believed that Talyor was the right man for the job
8-)
|
129.993 | Taylor who??????????????? | BERN02::GOODEJ | | Wed Oct 27 1993 19:42 | 8 |
|
Re .-1
No really I didn't. To be quite honest, when my mate told me that
Graham Taylor had been given the job, my first thought was "what are
the FA doing appointing a snooker player as England manager???"
JBG
|
129.994 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Thu Oct 28 1993 10:03 | 6 |
| last night result
Turkey 2 Poland 1
T_
|
129.995 | Hejja Norge! | BCFI::BSVENSSON | | Tue Nov 02 1993 18:03 | 8 |
| Hi friends!
I have a short question that maybe our norwegian friends
could kindly answer??
In what town will the Turkey-Norway game take place ??
The date is 10th. nov. and as I`m gonna be in Turkey
that week I was thinking , maybe I`ll watch the game ??
regards , Bengo.
|
129.996 | Turkish delight? | OSLACT::HENRIKW | Making the most of misery | Wed Nov 03 1993 12:13 | 9 |
129.997 | The state of English soccer | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Thu Nov 04 1993 13:01 | 53 |
|
I'm not sure if this is the right conference for the following, but it
makes interesting reading, with more than a grain of truth to it. It is
from the Reuter News Service:-
====================================Attachment==================================
By Mike Collett
LONDON, Nov 3 (Reuter) - England, barring a sensation, are out of the World Cup
English champions Manchester United are out of the European Cup.
The country which gave the world soccer has rarely suffered so badly.
Despite the much-heralded introduction of the premier league for the country's
top 22 teams last year and despite some superbly gifted individuals, the
failure of first the national side and then the national champions suggests
major problems in the international arena.
Add the behaviour of the hooligans who cause mayhem at away matches in Europe
and the picture becomes even more depressing.
It is now 27 years since England won the World Cup for the first and only time.
The national side have never won the European championship and in both the 1988
finals in Germany and 1992 finals in Sweden they were despatched without
winning a game.
English club sides have won 23 European trophies -- more than any other nation
- but it will be 10 years next May since an English side were last crowned
European Cup winners.
For five of those years English clubs were suspended from European competition
following the Heysel Stadium disaster at the 1985 European Cup final.
Since the ban was lifted in 1990 English sides have had one success in Europe -
Manchester United winning the Cup Winners' Cup in 1991.
That lone victory shows just how far English clubs have fallen.
In the 10 years before the ban English clubs won 10 European titles, including
the European Cup seven times, six of those in succession between 1977 and 1982.
The way the game is hyped by the media in Britain has often illustrated English
short-sightedness at its worst and echoes the days earlier this century when
England refused to belong to FIFA, world soccer's governing body, and enter the
World Cup.
One of the changes incorporated into the new premier league -- dubbed the
Greed Is Good League" by a respected English soccer writer -- has been the
introduction of American football-style squad numbers -- a cynical ploy to
exploit fans into buying specific replica shirts.
So while England's competitors concentrate on teaching their youngsters ball
skills and developing the game along modern lines, England's top clubs prefer
to play 42 league matches at 150kph and take their supporters for every spare
penny.
England's national team and English clubs may no longer be challenging for the
highest honours, but at least England have something no European country can
boast.
With their American-style numbers they have the best Nos. 25, 32 and 34 in the
business. The problem is that most of the time, Europe is playing a very
different ball game.
(c) Reuters Limited
REUTER NEWS SERVICE
|
129.998 | Niall 'Air' Quinn ...naaahhh.... | GYMAC::DCASSIDY | | Thu Nov 04 1993 14:39 | 6 |
|
Interesting note...this individual numbering on the back though was
a brilliant marketing exercise based surely on a certain No 23 from
an American sport!!!!
Dezzz...
|
129.999 | or a certain number 99 from a Canadian sport | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Thu Nov 04 1993 16:07 | 1 |
|
|
129.1000 | Does Ryan Giggs wear Red 5? | BERN02::GOODEJ | | Thu Nov 04 1993 16:45 | 1 |
|
|
129.1001 | Here a card to match your shirt, Eric.. | BREW11::RANKINE | | Fri Nov 05 1993 04:04 | 11 |
| I hope im not opening up a wound thta may have already been discussed
elsewhere...apologies in a dvance if I am..But re the staement in the
reuters report 'the country that gave the world the game' is there any
concrete evidence of this...I thoght China claimed to hold this honour.
I guess it depends on how you definfe it. I thinks England had the
first organised league in the world, althogh Queens park seem to
challenge Notts County as the oldest club. Does it all matter, and do
we really care ??
Paul
|
129.1002 | Taylor's Lament | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Tue Nov 09 1993 13:20 | 13 |
|
Well just eight more days of Taylor Management left and I for one can
hardly wait. The announcement yesterday of the squad has me scratching
my head again as Taylor errs on the side of caution *again* by
including Ripley in his squad. How many no-cappers does that bring the
total to now? With players like Waddle and Beardsley *still* waiting
for their recall Taylor picks Ripley. If I were a lawyer I'd 'rest my
case'. If he has to go for 'no-cappers' then why doesn't pick the
Premiership's leading scorer (2 more 'crackers' last night').
I gaze in wonderment at the man....thank God it's over!!!
Ned
|
129.1003 | Makes me sweat | KERNEL::WITHALLG | Wait Till They Getta Loada Me | Tue Nov 09 1993 13:29 | 19 |
|
I can see it now.
Poland 1 Holland 0
San Marino 0 England 0
Taylors team.
Woods/Seaman/Flowers
Dixon Pallister Walker Wright Ruddock Adams Keown Dorigo
Gazzer.
|
129.1004 | | SUBURB::COOKS | Taking the biscuit | Tue Nov 09 1993 16:05 | 4 |
| Just imagine the absolute outrage if a miracle happens and Poland do
win....and England do their usual patting the ball all over the shop
and win 2 nil or something.
|
129.1005 | Cole, Beardsley, Fowler,Shearer,Ferdiand,Wright | PIECES::63585::SWIFFEN | | Wed Nov 10 1993 16:28 | 8 |
| What I can't understand is why didn't Mr T pick all the in form
strikers and play them, we don't need more than 2 defenders, we
need goals. If as everyone expects we lose at least we can go
out on a relatively reasonable (not high!) note.
The man's a fool!!!
Chris.
|
129.1006 | Good idea..but | OPG::TONY | | Wed Nov 10 1993 16:39 | 13 |
| >>What I can't understand is why didn't Mr T pick all the in form
>>strikers and play them, we don't need more than 2 defenders, we
>>need goals. If as everyone expects we lose at least we can go
>>out on a relatively reasonable (not high!) note.
>>The man's a fool!!!
>>Chris.
Good idea, but wouldn't they get in each others way...!!
Tony
|
129.1007 | Great Idea | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Wed Nov 10 1993 17:04 | 23 |
|
Ok, that gives me an idea, so here's my team for next week:-
A. Anybody
B. Anybody C. Anybody D. Anybody
Beardsley Platt Waddle
Wright Cole Ferdinand Shearer
Subs: Fowler, Sharpe, Anybody-Wotsenglish-Whocan-Shoot
what d'ya think????
Ned
|
129.1008 | You've goota be kidding Ned... | BERN02::GOODEJ | | Wed Nov 10 1993 17:17 | 5 |
|
Come on Ned, A.Anybody's been having a crap season. You've gotta
call up P.Anybody. 8+)
JBG
|
129.1009 | I Resign !!! | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Wed Nov 10 1993 17:27 | 10 |
|
re - .1008
Now I know what Grim Failure feels like. I pick an attacking team and I
get criticised for my choice of defenders. ;^) I'll just have to put on
my funeral jacket, leave out Andy Cole, Chris Waddle and Peter Beardsley
and pick someone new (Oh I know, I'll pick Ripley, he was devastating
against third division Shrewsbury yesterday!).
Ned
|
129.1010 | Ewood Park, Englands new Home ! | WOTVAX::GREENJA | Andy Green | Wed Nov 10 1993 17:45 | 14 |
|
Ned,
How much for C. Anybody ?
I'm looking for an English centre half with international potential,
regards,
Kenny D.
p.s. Does Stuart Ripleys previous employer have anything to do with your
opinion ?
|
129.1011 | No opinion on Ripley | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Wed Nov 10 1993 18:20 | 23 |
129.1012 | Dont forget A.Somebody..! | BCFI::PIHLSTROM | The bowsprit looks forward | Wed Nov 10 1993 19:20 | 6 |
|
I heard that A.Somebody are in good shape again,
and would play against San Marino :-)
|
129.1013 | Who could forget A. Somebody ? | WOTVAX::GREENJA | Andy Green | Wed Nov 10 1993 19:42 | 3 |
|
If the A stands for 'Attack' then you must be referring to the centre
half Liverpool bought recently. ;-)
|
129.1014 | Turkey 2 v Norway 1 | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Thu Nov 11 1993 11:52 | 4 |
|
Looks like too many beers for Norway as they must have gone into
yesterday's game with Turkey with a hangover. Or are we seeing the
emergence of Turkish football as a world force? 8^)
|
129.1015 | | BERN01::BOLGER | Jerry Bolger. | Thu Nov 11 1993 13:13 | 13 |
| Re: -5, -4, -3, etc.
Sorry Guys, but if you really thought about it, you'ld realise that
you can't have a load of Anybody's playing for a team that has a Nobody
as a manager !
Re: -1 According to CNN last night, the Turkish ecconomy is spiralling
into depression. Apparently, it has something to do with all the shops
closing down so that the shopkeepers can concentrate on their football
training !!! ;-)
Jerry.
|
129.1016 | | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Thu Nov 11 1993 18:15 | 5 |
|
I thought it was because they had to spend all their G.N.P to bribe
ref's.
Peter(An Impartial Celt).
|
129.1017 | England 6-0, Poland win 1-0... | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Mon Nov 15 1993 09:49 | 10 |
| Ripley is there apparantly because he plays with Shearer at Blackburn
and will supply the crosses for Shearer to knock in against the
San Marino Bus Driver.
I must say when I first saw the name of Ripley in the line up I was
kind of hoping it was the old England No.8 Andy Ripley, probably
more likely to score anyway....
-Dom
|
129.1018 | See the pig flying over the blue moon daddy ? | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Mon Nov 15 1993 14:01 | 8 |
|
-< England 6-0, Poland win 1-0, no more famine, world peace, DEC
gives everybody back their jobs and a $100,000 bonus, cure for baldness... >-
One can live in hope I suppose !
Peter(An Impartial Celt)
|
129.1019 | A Spit of a Prophecy | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Mon Nov 15 1993 14:08 | 12 |
|
Anyone see Graham Taylor on 'Spitting Image' last night?
He reckoned that all England needed to qualify was a war in
Scandinavia.
Another less likely option was that Poland beat Holland and England win
7-0.
See there is hope.
Ned
|
129.1020 | | FORTY2::ASH | Mail Interchange Group, Reading | Mon Nov 15 1993 15:33 | 8 |
| My favourite Taylor quote was
No-one ever considers Poland beating Holland 7-0 - then we only have
to win 1-0 against San Marino.
I think he was joking . . .
g
|
129.1021 | | CLARID::STUART | | Mon Nov 15 1993 16:47 | 5 |
| What about ... no-one ever considers that England may not beat San Marino...
I think I am joking.
Gordon.
|
129.1022 | | UNTADE::PCAS | Yorkie | Mon Nov 15 1993 17:28 | 5 |
|
I think it would be a fitting end to Graham Taylors illustrious
career, for England to get beaten 3-1 in Bologna.
Al.
|
129.1023 | Mirror's money is pretty safe I reckon | NEWOA::FIDO_T | Conation is the key | Mon Nov 15 1993 17:58 | 7 |
129.1024 | | CHEFS::HARRISR | Goosenargh! | Mon Nov 15 1993 18:38 | 14 |
| Has anyone out there thought of a really frightening scenario ? From
Wednesday there will probably be a man with the surname of Taylor out
in the wilderness looking for a job. There will also be a club out
there who will lose a manager to the England set up. Therefore there
will be a job going. Follow my drift, so .............. If say Hoddle
gets the job, there is a strong possibility Taylor will move in at
Stamford Bridge, or there could follow a shuffle of managers. ie Gerry
Francis gets the job, whatshisface at Reading gets the job at QPR and
taylor gets the Reading job, longballs them into nowheresville, and lives
happily ever after.
Frightening aint it ?
Rich.
|
129.1025 | | CUCKOO::YEOMANSD | | Mon Nov 15 1993 19:07 | 3 |
| Taylor would be welcome back at Vicarage Road.
Dave.
|
129.1026 | | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Mon Nov 15 1993 19:29 | 10 |
|
re:.1023
Well in that case lets hope that England beat San-Marino 100 - 0 and
Holland beat Poland. Nice payout !
Two little pieces of annoying annoying shit will have got their just
reward !
Peter(You know who).
|
129.1027 | To sleep perchance to dream | DBSUK2::GRICE | Phil Grice DBS Sustaining Engineering | Tue Nov 16 1993 00:44 | 5 |
| I must admit I like the way the BBC are hyping the game on Wednesday -
pictures of goals going in to the music of the Great Escape,the
Magnificent Seven and the Impossible Dream :^)
/phil
|
129.1028 | ...Andy, Andy Cole... | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Tue Nov 16 1993 12:20 | 8 |
|
According to teletext Shearer is now out of the reckoning, so it looks
like Wright and Ferdinand to play "shooty-in" >8-). I wonder who's
gonna come on as sub though when Wright and Ferdi miss a hatfull. I
know I'm biased but Mr Taylor, if you're reading this, give Andy Cole a
game!!!
Ever hopeful.....Ned
|
129.1029 | | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | On 7830-2924 | Tue Nov 16 1993 12:54 | 7 |
|
Is the Poland v Holland game being played the same time as the England
game???
Tony
|
129.1030 | YES!!!! | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Tue Nov 16 1993 12:59 | 1 |
|
|
129.1031 | I'll be there I'll be there I'lllll be there | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Tue Nov 16 1993 14:44 | 7 |
| I'll be leaving Holland tonight at around 12 to attend tommorows game
Poland - Holland in Poznan. There have been rumours here that the Polish mob
will kick *ss but I don't believe it. When we qualify the whole of Poznan will
be orange.
T_
|
129.1032 | | SUBURB::COOKS | Taking the biscuit | Tue Nov 16 1993 15:04 | 5 |
| Lets prey that the Mirror will have to fulfil their promise of handing
110,000 pounds out to the Polish squad.
er,though I doubt it somehow.
|
129.1033 | Pray for a miracle.... | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Tue Nov 16 1993 15:31 | 9 |
| It's bound to be nightmare time again with the Poles involved.
Poland will go 1 up within 10 minutes, England hearing this start
knocking the goals in and get the 7 needed, only for Holland to
get the equalizer in the 89th minute....
...its bound to happen :-(
-Dom
|
129.1034 | Even more horrifying...... | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Tue Nov 16 1993 17:58 | 6 |
| re-1 Dom
No even worse......it stays 1-0 in Poznan but St Marino scores 7-1 in
the 91th minute........;-)
John, getting slowly orange......
|
129.1035 | | SUBURB::COOKS | Taking the biscuit | Tue Nov 16 1993 20:17 | 3 |
| Even worse...Poland beat Holland 7-0 and England lose 1-0 due to a
freak own goal by Les Ferdinand (who gets confused).
|
129.1036 | Snowballs chance in hell | KERNEL::WITHALLG | Wait Till They Getta Loada Me | Tue Nov 16 1993 21:40 | 6 |
|
More chance of a War in Scandinavia as reported earlier.
Gazzer
|
129.1037 | HAVE FAITH !!! | MACNAS::SMORAN | | Wed Nov 17 1993 10:41 | 7 |
| Have faith, did not poland lead Holland 2 nil away only to draw. Who
says that they cannot win by 3 nil at home. That leaves England to
score five. Well good luck tonight and may the best two teams go
forward.
p.s. Poland owe ye one.
|
129.1038 | Fool to the last... | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Wed Nov 17 1993 11:17 | 30 |
|
Well the fool couldnt resist one last chance to tinker, here is the
team for the game Bologna tonight.
Seaman
Dixon...????
Walker
Pallister
Pearce
Ince
Platt
Ripley
Sinton...???
Ferdinand
Wright
Thankyou Paul Parker, thankyou Lee Sharpe, but you wont be required
anymore. In comes Ripley for his one cap to put in his sideboard, and
Back comes Lee Dixon, he's the one who cant pass, but he can punt the
ball in the general direction of Les Ferdinand's head, and finally Lee
Sharpe, having his best season yet for the manx, and having played in
about the last 5 or so games for England, he's outed for Andy Sinton.
Imagine if the miracle does happen, we have to put up with this
clueless idiot for the next four years.....it's almost enough to make
you want us to go out tonight.
Goodbye Taylor, You've been the worst manager we've ever had.
Dave...
|
129.1039 | GT pick Andy Cole - wow! | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Wed Nov 17 1993 11:25 | 20 |
| <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 129.1028 World Cup qualifying Group 2 1028 of 1037
SIOG::A_KELLY 8 lines 16-NOV-1993 09:20
-< ...Andy, Andy Cole... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>According to teletext Shearer is now out of the reckoning, so it looks
>like Wright and Ferdinand to play "shooty-in" >8-). I wonder who's
>gonna come on as sub though when Wright and Ferdi miss a hatfull. I
>know I'm biased but Mr Taylor, if you're reading this, give Andy Cole a
>game!!!
>Ever hopeful.....Ned
Thanks Mr Taylor, so you do read the notes files. I'll never
criticise you again (well not till tomorrow anyway).
Cheers.....Ned
|
129.1040 | Re: .1038 | CUCKOO::YEOMANSD | | Wed Nov 17 1993 11:28 | 5 |
| He speaks very well of you.
Actually, I heard Sinton was in because Sharp was injured.
Dave.
|
129.1041 | Re:.1038 | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Wed Nov 17 1993 13:04 | 4 |
|
I heard dixon was in because Parker is crap !
Peter(An Impartial Celt).
|
129.1042 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Wed Nov 17 1993 13:25 | 11 |
|
>> I heard dixon was in because Parker is crap !
Which ever way you look at it he's better than Dixon.
Another point...what happened to Merson..??? remeber him, he was the
one who was given the job to get goals against Holland instead of
Wright, now Wright is back and Merson is nowhere....just another
example of Mr Taylor's tactical genius over the last 3.5 years.
Dave...
|
129.1043 | | CUCKOO::YEOMANSD | | Wed Nov 17 1993 13:41 | 3 |
| I believe Merson is also injured. Probably Taylor's fault as well.
Dave.
|
129.1044 | | SUBURB::ABSOLOMT | On 7830-2924 | Wed Nov 17 1993 13:45 | 9 |
|
Taylor is a bad joke. How can he possibly think that Dixon is a better
option than Rob Jones??? He can't defend, he can't attack. In fact,
knowing Taylors ideas on the game, he's probably been brought in for
his long throw.
Tony
|
129.1045 | Another price money.... | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Wed Nov 17 1993 13:49 | 16 |
| The madness still going on ; some company here in Holland ( Marketing
probably...) has in reaction on the price money of the Mirror promised
the players of St Marino about 40.000 pounds if they beat England....
And now the hard part ; they have assured this money at Ladbroke in
London. So if St Marino wins in the end they will be paid by the
english themselves.........
What a sick way of trying to influence football...........
Oh yes, the last 2-2 from Holland-Poland was indeed coming back from a
0-2 score. But in the end it should have been 20-2 for Holland ; it was
unbelievable to see how van Basten and the others missed the most
beautifull chances..........And in the end it was almost 2-3 when
Smolarek, who plays in Holland almost scored.......
John
|
129.1046 | | EBYGUM::WATTERSONP | | Wed Nov 17 1993 13:50 | 8 |
|
re .1044
Rob Jones is injured aswell ..... typical Taylor !!!!
Gary Ablett for England !
Paul
|
129.1047 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Wed Nov 17 1993 13:51 | 11 |
|
Re-2
Where did you here about all these injuries....if they are why are they
in the squad ?.
According to todays press, they are "tactical" changes.
Your not related to Mr Taylor are you...?
Dave...
|
129.1048 | Now for something completely different | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Wed Nov 17 1993 13:59 | 7 |
|
It seems that the Dutch Advertising Agency HVR has offered fl 100,000
to San Marino to beat England tonight. Sounds like real good old
patriotism until you hear the rest of the story. They have also, it is
reported, got a bet on with Ladbrokes that San Marino win.
That's what I call good business....England lose and the English pay
the incentive.
|
129.1049 | | NEWOA::FIDO_T | Conation is the key | Wed Nov 17 1993 14:06 | 5 |
| > -< Now for something completely different >-
Looks remarkably similar to .1045 to me !
Terry
|
129.1050 | Tinker Taylor does it again | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Wed Nov 17 1993 14:09 | 23 |
|
Well Taylor's last game tonight...Let's face it, England will score
the 7 goals there is no doubt about that but Poland won't get a result
against Holland....Even in his last game Taylor has still f****d it up.
Taylor took over from Bobby Robson who took us to the Semi Final off the
1990 World Cup and made us the 4th best team in the world..And now we
can't even qualify, we have the players but the manager f****d up with
his pathetic tatics and team selection.. He had the chance to build on
Robson's success and take us one step closer... After tonight Taylor
will be GONE BUT NEVER FORGOTTON. I'll tell you this the World Cup without
England is like...Queen without Freddie Mercury, Rolling Stones without
Mick Jagger, Bono without his wellies, Jocky Wilson without his kilt,
A Pub without Beer...Thanks Taylor not only have you ruined it for
the English public but you have spoilt it for the other countrys to
who love having the likes of Germany and England to play against.
All this will have been forgotton when England win the European
Championships in 1996 under the new management team. I don't care what
anyone says we have the players it's the tinkering of Taylor thats got
us into this mess....
Neil....
|
129.1051 | | NEWOA::FIDO_T | Conation is the key | Wed Nov 17 1993 14:39 | 5 |
| >Let's face it, England will score
>the 7 goals there is no doubt about that
Really ! you mean like we did the last time we played them ?
|
129.1052 | | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Wed Nov 17 1993 14:49 | 7 |
|
> Really ! you mean like we did the last time we played them ?
NO! we only scored 6......And that was at a canter....we've got to
score one more this time and we will....
Neil...
|
129.1053 | Stop dropping those tabs man. | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Wed Nov 17 1993 15:06 | 29 |
|
re .1050
This note is excused on the grounds that you must be very upset.
England will score 7 goals ??????????????????
The 4th best team in the world ??????????????
Taylor will never be forgotten ??????????????
Win in 1996 ?????????????????????????????????
Bobby Robson as I recall led that great and glorious team to Germany
for the European Championships and yet that has been forgotten in light
of a LUCKY win against both Cameroon and Belgium and all of this in
what is generally acknowledged to have been a pretty woeful World Cup.
It ain't Taylors fault it's the fault of the system. Gary Lineker made
a very valid point last Saturday on football focus, when he said that
the only chance that English football has now is for the directors of
the clubs ( M.U.F.C etc...) knocked out of European competition to feel
the decline of the England team in their pockets i.e the standards set
by the England team are reflected in the club scene (at every level)
and the best club in the country was comprehensively beaten by a third
rate European side costing them 7,000,000.
Enough for now,
Peter(An Impartial Celt).
|
129.1054 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Wed Nov 17 1993 15:29 | 7 |
|
Impartial Celt.
Can you explain to me why England were "lucky" to beat Cameroon and
Belgium.
Dave...
|
129.1055 | | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Wed Nov 17 1993 15:49 | 23 |
|
.1053...
The group games in the 1990 finals were poor except England-Holland.
But the knockout stages was one of the best I can remember, with
England being involved in three of the best games of the tournement.
Even the 3rd and 4th play-off game was very entertaining. I'm
afraid the final was a big let down and thats the game people tend
to remember and base there judgement on....
It's your anti-English views thats getting in the way of the truth....
A two year rebuilding period will do the England set-up a world of good
ready for the Euro Championships...
The only people who think the 1966 and 1990 World Cup Finals were
woe-ful are the anti-English brigade.....
Neil....
|
129.1056 | | SUBURB::WAITEG | MAKE MY DAY, RING ME 7830 2450 | Wed Nov 17 1993 16:00 | 22 |
| Ireland are the luckiest team in the world-
1990 World cup
--------------
1/ V Holland 10 minutes left and they are going out of the world cup
until a mistake by the Dutch keeper levels the score.
2/ Holland and Ireland draw on points and their names go into a hat to
see who will play Germany. Holland drawn against Germany whilst Ireland are
faced with Romania.
3/ Ireland outclassed by Romania but win on penalties.
4/ Italy beat em' 1-0. Should have been 3-0.
Ireland didn't win a single game in the World Cup unless you count
penalties.
Hugs,
Gary (THE IMPARTIAL SOAPBOXER)
|
129.1057 | | CLADA::DODONNELL | Nothing personal.It's just business. | Wed Nov 17 1993 16:11 | 7 |
|
Re Gary
Yeah but apart from all that, what makes you think Ireland were lucky?
;')
Denis.
|
129.1058 | | SUBURB::WAITEG | MAKE MY DAY, RING ME 7830 2450 | Wed Nov 17 1993 16:13 | 8 |
| Good one, Denny:-))
Hugs to Denny,
GAry
|
129.1059 | | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Wed Nov 17 1993 16:14 | 25 |
| re: .1055
Would'ya go away !
If that's the case then most soccer pundits must be Anti-English.
I agree with you that some of the knockout games were entertaining,
but it wasn't the class of football which made them so but the
stalemates which resulted i.e extra time & penalties. The goal Platt
scored against Belgium was a fluke. Belgium controled most of that game
and should have scored on numerous occasions. The Cameroon aside from
being a bit naive at the back were by far the best team in the
tournament (Germany excepted). You were blessed to beat them !
If you think that two years are going to turn English football around then
think again. It's that type of arrorgance which has landed the team in
the mess they're in today. As a matter of fact it is not that English
football needs to be turned around ,but rather that it needs to be
pointed in a direction comensurate with the expectations of a nation.
You want to be one of the best teams in the world. You've
never been close to it with the exception of the 1966 - 1970 teams.
That's over 20 years ago. Tell me, how do you turn around 20 years of
decline in 2 years ?
Peter(An Impartial Celt).
|
129.1060 | Where were u when Koeman scored | YELBUS::DSMITH | Gazza's my hero...NOT!!!!! | Wed Nov 17 1993 16:15 | 16 |
|
re .1055
"The only people who think the 1966 and 1990 World Cup Finals were
woe-ful are the anti-English brigade."
Well, there you go then, 99% of the worlds population can't all be
wrong!!
Anyway, best of luck to all the teams attempting to reach the WC
finals tonight, especially the boys from Holland.
Danny.
|
129.1061 | re:1056 You're dead right Gary :-) | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Wed Nov 17 1993 16:17 | 1 |
|
|
129.1062 | | SUBURB::WAITEG | MAKE MY DAY, RING ME 7830 2450 | Wed Nov 17 1993 16:18 | 11 |
| Re 1060
This Danny bloke makes me laugh. I've read many of his notes and I
reckon he is a little bit jealous of the English.
You should be proud to be a Scot, Danny. They're a great footballing
nation. They only lost to Costa Rica 1-0.
Hugs to Danny,
GAry (The Impartial Soapboxer)
|
129.1063 | | SUBURB::WAITEG | MAKE MY DAY, RING ME 7830 2450 | Wed Nov 17 1993 16:19 | 8 |
| Re 1061
Thanks Mr Hayden (The Impartial Celt).
Hugs,
GAry:-)))
|
129.1064 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Wed Nov 17 1993 16:20 | 6 |
|
Impartial Celt.
Now can you explain to me why David Platt's goal was a fluke...?
Dave...
|
129.1065 | | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Wed Nov 17 1993 16:29 | 18 |
|
O.K,
Gazza chips over the wall, Plattie had his back to the goal, swung a leg at
the ball, not a clue where it was going(ask the man) and voila, flukie
goal for Engerland in the back of the net.
Then again if you're English this translates to....
Gazza chiped the perfect ball (best player in the world was Gazza) onto
the tip-toe of plattie who even with his back to the goal used his
(British engineered radar) soccer skills to pick his spotm and burried
the ball past the outstretch arms of the best keeper in the world (at
the time) into the only place where he(the keeper) couldn't reach it.
Bye,
Peter(An Impartial Celt).
|
129.1066 | take some of that | AYOV16::KMCCLELLAND | The Honest Truth | Wed Nov 17 1993 16:31 | 11 |
| Re 1062
This <GAry> bloke makes me laugh. I've read many of his notes and I
reckon he is a little bit jealous of <anyone who is likely to qualify>.
You should be proud to be an <Englishman>,GAry. They're a great footballing
nation. They only lost to <USA 2-0>.
Hugs to <GAry>,
Kev...
|
129.1067 | | EBYGUM::WATTERSONP | | Wed Nov 17 1993 16:32 | 8 |
|
Mr Impartial,
you obviously know even less about football than I thought - if you
bothered watching Platt much you'd see he scores goals similar to that
on a regular basis.
Paul
|
129.1068 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Wed Nov 17 1993 16:36 | 15 |
|
Impartial Celt.
How can I ask him, I dont know him, although I met him at Prague
Airport last year when England played Czechoslovakia, maybe I should
have mentioned his fluky goal then.
The thing is, did he or did he not try and hit the ball with his foot and
put the ball into the net..?
The only reason you think this goal was a fluke was it was scored by an
Englishman. Most viewers thought it was one of the best goals in the
tournement.
Dave...
|
129.1069 | :re.1067 For who ? More clubs than hot dinners ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Wed Nov 17 1993 16:37 | 1 |
|
|
129.1070 | | SUBURB::WAITEG | MAKE MY DAY, RING ME 7830 2450 | Wed Nov 17 1993 16:39 | 7 |
| Hey Kev,
My note was copyrighted:-))
Gary
|
129.1071 | Try Changing EL for UN... | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Wed Nov 17 1993 17:02 | 13 |
|
.1059
What are YOU on ?!!
Anyone who thought Platt's goal was flukey obviously knows nothing
about football.....Quality strike....
The only thing wrong with the English football is the bods that run it..
If we don't qualify this time, one things for sure we will next time...
Neil...
|
129.1072 | Silly boy.. | YELBUS::DSMITH | Gazza's my hero...NOT!!!!! | Wed Nov 17 1993 17:02 | 13 |
|
re 1062
Hey Gary, my mother had the good sense to make sure she didn't
drop me in England many years ago so why would I be jealous.
Danny.
ps Don't slag me about Scotland, I only reside here, born many many
miles away. Support your local team and all that.
pps Where were when Koeman scored???
|
129.1073 | | SUBURB::WAITEG | MAKE MY DAY, RING ME 7830 2450 | Wed Nov 17 1993 17:09 | 10 |
| Re 1072
Mr Danny,
I was at home watching Ronald Koeman's super freekick.
Hugs,
Gary (THe IMPARTIAl SOAPBOXEr)
|
129.1074 | | KIRKTN::AMCARTHUR | andrew 789 8225 | Wed Nov 17 1993 17:16 | 4 |
| good luck to all tonight....hopefully San Marino can score one 8^)
against the best in the world..not.
should be fun tonight...
|
129.1075 | | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Wed Nov 17 1993 17:16 | 7 |
|
re: 1071
Isn't that sweet. I fyou changed the CO to PU we could almot be
related.
Peter(An Impartial C**t). fill in as appropriate.
|
129.1076 | Get a Grip on Yourselves | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Wed Nov 17 1993 17:17 | 26 |
|
Just did a little analysis of the last 20 entries in both note 129
(England's Group) and note 130 (Ireland's group).
Note 130
========
Of the 20 entries 2 were from supporters of teams outside the scope
of the note. Both were entries wishing Ireland luck. The rest are
mutual backslapping and well wishing, probably as it should be.
Note 129
========
Of the 20 entries 10 were from supporters of teams ouside the scope
of the note. Most were derrogatory descriptions of how jammy England
were in the last World Cup. The rest are from English people trying to
defend England's last World Cup performance.
So it seems note 129 is heading back to it's old format of 'let's slag
off England'. It's funny how it *always* gets back to this.
Dread to think what it will be like tomorrow.
Ned (the partial Yank/Canadian/Irish/German/Geordie)
|
129.1077 | Where the HELL is Peter Beardsley you stupid man! | FILTON::KEARNS_R | uh oh KWYJIBO on the loose!!!! | Wed Nov 17 1993 17:21 | 13 |
|
Tomorrows Papers.....
"Dutch woe as Koeman scores injury time own goal"
"Platt makes it 7 but admits he was lucky"
Rob \|||/
{ o o }
\ = /
"
|
129.1078 | Yes Ned, but some of your country men don't help you... | BERN02::GOODEJ | | Wed Nov 17 1993 18:30 | 20 |
|
Re .1076
Hi Ned,
have a quick look in 131 (Wales' group). You'll find a few prime
examples of the sort of encouragement we get from a few English.....
one of them even offers to help US (ie the Welsh at the Arms Park)
sing the Rumainian National Anthem. There'll definitely be some singing
there......
So Ned, I know they're only two individuals, but how can you
complain about anti-English sentiment. I haven't seen any provokation
from us Welshies (have you Mr Wicks??).
I do agree about you general point. Ie. as soon as there's any big
game on, out come the rude boys with there "can't wait to see your face
when your team get stuffed" comments. Such is life. Ours is not to
reason why, ours is to ignore them.
JBG
|
129.1079 | YAWN!!! HERE WE GO AGAIN | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | BLUE IS THE COLOUR | Wed Nov 17 1993 18:33 | 11 |
| Why dont you Micks get off our note and stick to your own. Every time
England play we have to put up with all this crap, and just because
youv'e all got such big chips on your shoulders we have to be bored
silly by your boring ramblings every time there's an International
involving England. I suppose tommorow we'll have to put up with all
you Irish giving us your expert opinions on Englands performance as
usual. I'd really love it if by some miracle we qualify tonight, you
lot would be sick...
Andy..B
|
129.1080 | ENGLAND!! ENGLAND!! ENGLAND!! ENGLAND!! | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Wed Nov 17 1993 18:34 | 12 |
|
Good luck England You'll get your 7 goals NO problem.....
Poland do us a favour get a win........
Then the whole world will be greatful for helping the greatest side
in the world to qualify....If we do qualify tonight I have no DOUBT WE
GO ON AND WIN THE 1996 WORLD CUP.....
Neil Pussey....
|
129.1081 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Better Dead than Smeg! | Wed Nov 17 1993 18:55 | 18 |
|
Stolen from the Internet, latest odds on qualification and new England
manager, if anyone cares:
England are 10-1 to qualify for WC '94
Wales are 11-8 to qualify
Rep of Ireland are 4-6 to qualify
The leading candidates for Taylor's job are:
HOWARD WILKINSON 3-1
GERRY FRANCIS 5-1
STEVE COPPELL 6-1
GLENN HODDLE 8-1
GEORGE GRAHAM 8-1
RON ATKINSON 8-1
Tim
|
129.1082 | Nowt queerer than folk... | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Wed Nov 17 1993 19:15 | 14 |
|
re - .1078
You're right, but I didn't see the note 131 stuff 'til after I'd
written .1036 (guess that's the problem with this not being realtime
(what the term? unrealtime?).
I just can't for the life of me understand why *anyone* who was born in
the British Isles (geographically speaking) would want a home side *not*
to qualify. How could anyone justify this desire with a rational
argument. In my opinion it would be *great* if Wales, Ireland and (yes)
England *all* qualify tonight.
Good luck to all......Ned
|
129.1083 | Ta Boyo | AYOV25::SSMALLWOOD | Steve Smallwood @ DBO, Good Grief | Wed Nov 17 1993 19:19 | 6 |
| Re-1
Thanks Alan
Steve.
|
129.1084 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | BLUE IS THE COLOUR | Wed Nov 17 1993 19:21 | 6 |
|
I'm English.... not Jock, not Taff, and not Irish, thats why i
hope all the others dont get the results they wont..
COME ON ENGLAND..
|
129.1085 | As I said - "no rational reason" | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Wed Nov 17 1993 19:28 | 6 |
|
re .1084
You've told me you're English, but you still haven't given me the
reason why you want Ireland and Wales to get beat? Are either of them
playing England tonight?
|
129.1086 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | BLUE IS THE COLOUR | Wed Nov 17 1993 19:50 | 2 |
|
Why should i want any other club to win..
|
129.1087 | | BERN02::GOODEJ | | Wed Nov 17 1993 19:51 | 19 |
|
Re .1082
Yeah, thanks Alan.
I'm first and foremost Welsh. Then British. I have no relations in
Ireland but we go way way back as Celts, so they count as one of the
"home nations" for me. I would love to see England qualify tonight. Not
because they deserve it or they're the best team. Just because they're
England.
We Welsh (and Irish?) don't believe we have any right to get to the
USA. We hope get get some luck. We want to see our teams to do well.
And if we don't, well, lets face it, we're not great footballing
nations. We'll try again next time. In Nurenburg when the Germans
absolutely stuffed us 5:1 we didn't come away crying in our beers. We
came away singing.
JBG
|
129.1088 | Altogether now.."WE all want England to win,dadada | MASALA::CDOUDIE | Do it again..hahahaha !! | Wed Nov 17 1993 20:10 | 11 |
| RE .1080
You probably will win the '1996 WORLD CUP', because you will be the
only ones contesting it........
and I hope you win tonight and I hope Holland win...see, we're not all
biased.......
Non racist replies only please.....
colin.
|
129.1089 | | PEKING::BAREFIELDA | BLUE IS THE COLOUR | Wed Nov 17 1993 20:21 | 1 |
| you make me feel sick....
|
129.1090 | England 5 - 0 ? | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Wed Nov 17 1993 20:22 | 26 |
|
Of course we want England to win. Who cares ????? San Marino Huhhh !
Holland to win .
Ireland to win.
Wales to win.
France to win.
Italy to win.
Switzerland to win.
Spain to win.
Now to the Pub to cheer on good ol' England.
I hope England do rebuild their team in time for 1996 European
Championships and win the bloody thing ! But I doubt it !
Howard Wilkinson favourite to get *the* job. Does nae bode well.
Peter(An Impartial Celt)
|
129.1091 | | YUPPY::BUSH | Alive and Kicking | Wed Nov 17 1993 22:08 | 6 |
|
Score after 10 (yes TEN) seconds
San Marino 1 England 0
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
129.1092 | | YUPPY::BUSH | Alive and Kicking | Wed Nov 17 1993 22:14 | 4 |
|
Poland 1 - holland 1
Tony B.
|
129.1093 | | YUPPY::BUSH | Alive and Kicking | Wed Nov 17 1993 22:24 | 2 |
|
San Marino 1 England 1 (Paul Ince) 22mins
|
129.1094 | | YUPPY::BUSH | Alive and Kicking | Wed Nov 17 1993 22:36 | 4 |
|
San Marino 1 England @ (ian Wright) 32 mins
Tony B
|
129.1095 | | YUPPY::BUSH | Alive and Kicking | Wed Nov 17 1993 22:40 | 4 |
|
San Marino 1 England 3 (Ferdinand) 37 mins
Tony B.
|
129.1096 | | YUPPY::BUSH | Alive and Kicking | Wed Nov 17 1993 22:53 | 7 |
|
Half Times
SAn Marino 1 England 3
Poland 1 Holland 1
|
129.1097 | | YUPPY::BUSH | Alive and Kicking | Wed Nov 17 1993 23:08 | 4 |
|
SAn Marino 1 England 4 (Ian Wright) 46 mins
TonyB.
|
129.1098 | | YUPPY::BUSH | Alive and Kicking | Wed Nov 17 1993 23:16 | 4 |
|
Poland 1 Holland 2
Tony B.
|
129.1099 | | YUPPY::BUSH | Alive and Kicking | Wed Nov 17 1993 23:49 | 4 |
|
Poland 1 HOlland 3
tony B.
|
129.1100 | England Out !! | BUSSTP::DREES | | Wed Nov 17 1993 23:56 | 11 |
|
They think it's all over.....
It is now !!!
Final Scores
San Marino 1 England 7
Poland 1 Holland 3
Del.
|
129.1101 | It was the Poles fault !!. | KERNEL::WITHALLG | Wait Till They Getta Loada Me | Thu Nov 18 1993 00:12 | 6 |
|
Tha Tha Tha Thats All Folks......
|
129.1102 | The 10 second rule | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Thu Nov 18 1993 09:02 | 7 |
| OK....so I'm a masochist, what happened in the first 10 seconds!!!!
-Dom
P.s. By the way spare a thought for the French who had qualifyed up
to the last 10 seconds, when the Bulgarians scored the winner and
knocked the French out..
|
129.1103 | There's always 1998 <smile> | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Thu Nov 18 1993 10:53 | 44 |
|
re .1102
Well San Marino kicked off, went straight up the field, the final pass
went astray, and Stuart Pearce tried to pass back to Seaman but only
succeeded in teeing it up for the San Marino no. 10. Brilliant start,
the crowd (well congregation) went wild!!!!
As for the rest of the game England were CRAP CRAP CRAP CRAP CRAP (hope
I got enough craps in there). The game plan was to get to the bye-lines
and pump in great long crosses, which, for 30 odd minutes, the giant
San Marino defenders had absolutely no problems with. Even though
England went in 3-1 up at half time they didn't deserve it as two goals
were direct goalkeeping goolies and the other was from Paul Ince, who,
fed up with the England forwards' total inadequacy, bundled his own
lads aside (in a 'get the f*** out the way and let me show you how to
do it' gesture) went straight for goal and buried the ball.
Thank God we didn't have to endure much of the second half as BBC
made a tactical switch to the Wales game which gave us a chance to
readjust to some decent football.
Low points:-
Ripley was crap.
Dixon was Double crap.
Pearce was Triple crap.
Did Platt play?
Wright and Ferdinand couldn't control the ball worth a s***.
The tactic was Quadruple crap.
High points:-
Taylor is Gonzo!!
I guess I should offer some advice on how I would have done better.
Well this is it:-
I would have picked the entire Newcastle United team
(I know I'm biased but they're *all* English) and we would have had a
side which plays good, flowing attacking football, with two strikers
who are deadly in front of goal. The score would have been 25-0 to
England but alas it would have only been academic as the Poles caved in
again.
Keep smiling.......Ned
|
129.1104 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Nov 18 1993 11:15 | 28 |
|
Well the enivitable happened, we are finally out, and we havent
deserved to qualify.
Graham Taylor was left a promising side when he took over from Bobby
Robson, and in the 3 years since he has basically dragged us further
and further down. This man has played the same side twice in 37
internationals. Some will say he hasnt been helped by injuries, ok to a
certain extent, but he has played players out of position, gone to
major championships without recognised players in certain positions,
taken off the leading scorer when we were 1-0 down in major
international games and changed the team and tactics constantly from one
game to the next.
If the FA keep this man on in any form to help with the international
team then they obviously don not give a f*ck about the England team.
We want a manager thats played at the top level, and has the respect of
the players, how can a man who's major claim to footballing fame was
playing for Lincoln, tell the likes of Platt and Gascoigne (if he ever
gets fit) how to play the game.
That means no Ron Atkinson, (although I think he would do a good job),
and definatley no Howard Wilkinson. He's just a clone of Graham Taylor.
Dave...
|
129.1105 | | CUCKOO::YEOMANSD | | Thu Nov 18 1993 11:29 | 6 |
| Re: .1104
I agree Taylor has to go, but Robson was guilty of all the things
you're accusing Taylor of. Robson just had better players and luck.
Dave.
|
129.1106 | Goodbye Graham, we had some laughs in the end... | BERN02::GOODEJ | | Thu Nov 18 1993 11:34 | 20 |
|
Re. 1103
Ned,
I have to agree with you (but you forgot to mention the Scintilating
Sinton)....Newcastle would have absolutely creamed them. Not that it
would have made any differnece in the end.
Anyway, that 9 second goal was worth it just to see the look on Mr
Taylor's face!
JBG
Ps. as an aside, does anyone ever remeber Taylor making any tactical
substitutions. I mean, after 20 minutes of long crosses being pick off,
it was pretty clear that Ripley was a bad tactical decision. Ince's
goal showed they needed to take players on so why didn't he bring on
Andy Cole and young Clough and get rid of two wingers that weren't
all that successful?
|
129.1107 | What about an exchange ? | EVOAI2::COCONNIER | | Thu Nov 18 1993 11:38 | 6 |
129.1108 | | PEKING::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Thu Nov 18 1993 11:46 | 12 |
|
Re . 1105
Dave...
Dont get me wrong, Bobby Robson was far from perfect, but I dont
remeber him constantly changing the team around, and playing players
out of position.
Also he didnt change the tactics everytime we played.
Dave...
|
129.1109 | Lee....., a man for all seasons | YUPPY::PANES | French kisses and chinese burns | Thu Nov 18 1993 12:04 | 10 |
|
I should imagine most people who support England are feeling somewhat
down in the dumps today. But if you look hard enough you can find good
things in almost anything. I for one, was heartened by the way Lee Dixon
kept pinging in crosses with pinpoint accuracy time and time again.
Surely '96 and the European Championships will be a fitting stage for
this man to demonstrate his talents to his detractors.
A Lunatic
|
129.1110 | We make US orange ! | UTROP1::HANSSEN_J | are you serious ? | Thu Nov 18 1993 12:17 | 22 |
| Poland - Holland 1-3
It wasn't the easy game it looked like. Poland has done its sportive
duty and played like hell, supported by the referee Sundrell. The field
was hard and that caused that the dutch couln't play their favourable
game ; playing fast around, technical beauties and speed.
In the 10th minute Bergkamp scored a beauty...like in London he hit a
ball from Wouters, without letting it hit the ground, in the far end of
the goal !
Only three minutes later England-fans' dream came out ; Koeman kicked
the ball against Lesniak who, through this action, came free for goal
and equalized 1-1 ! After that both teams stayed attacking with the
dutch looking stronger. In the second half the same, only in the 10th
minute (again) Roy went through on the wing and let Bergkamp make 1-2.
The polish got stronger but couldn't create good oppurtunities. On the
other side the dutch had several chances untill de Boer scored 1-3.
After that he hit the barn.....Not a great game, best players Wouters,
de Boer and Bergkamp.
We made it on our own strength, we didn't need a bad score of the
english ! WE DID IT !!!!!!! (Sorry for my shouting......)
John
|
129.1111 | | EBYGUM::WATTERSONP | Don't mention the world cup | Thu Nov 18 1993 12:28 | 4 |
|
Wasn't Brookside exciting last night ?
Paul
|
129.1112 | | CUCKOO::YEOMANSD | | Thu Nov 18 1993 12:39 | 17 |
| Re: .1108
I seem to remember Roson changing to a sweeper system half way through
the last World Cup finals. Also, I'm convinced one of the main reasons
Barnes never did well for England was because Robson used to play him
at left back.
As for changing the team around, even if you forget England's recent
injury problems, Robson had the advantage of a core of consistantly
good players such as Shilton, Robson, Butcher and Lineker.
Anyway, I'm too depressed to argue the point further. I can't see any
manager doing well with our current crop of players. When our top club
side can't beat the Turks, there obviously isn't a great deal of talent
about.
Dave.
|
129.1113 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Better Dead than Smeg! | Thu Nov 18 1993 12:40 | 9 |
|
re .1111
Paul, I missed it, any chance of a brief synopsis?
Tim
PS. Well done Ireland, commiserations to Wales (I'm gutted for you)
and FOAD Taylor, and that shambles of a team of yours.
|
129.1114 | | BERN02::GOODEJ | | Thu Nov 18 1993 13:00 | 14 |
|
Hey come on guys,
there are some quality players around who have been playing
consistently well. Taylor just didn't pick many of them. He did stick
with a few eg. Platt & Ince. Some may say Ince is not world class, but
for me he's the sort of guy you gotta have in there, always battling.
Pity Beardsley (who Shilt's reckons is too old!!!), Waddle, Cole....
weren't given any opportunity to do their bit.
Don't go talking down the whole of English football just because of
what's happened. Yes, the system has to be drastically changed, but the
players are there, ready and waiting for their next chance.
JBG
|
129.1115 | Congrats Holland | SIOG::A_KELLY | | Thu Nov 18 1993 13:08 | 8 |
| re .1110
John,
Congratulations to Holland. You're absolutely right, you got to the
WC94 finals because of what you're team did, and didn't rely on others.
Best of luck next summer.
Cheers......Ned
|
129.1116 | | FORTY2::ROBERTSON | | Thu Nov 18 1993 13:13 | 38 |
129.1117 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Fight the power | Thu Nov 18 1993 13:20 | 27 |
| I think there's a lot more parity these days among the half decent footballing
nations. Traditional powerhouses like Italy, Germany, Brazil certainly aren't
the dominant forces they used to be, and as for England...8-(
I don't think arguments about Taylor not being able to pick the best 11 players
really hold water because any 11 players from domestic club football should
play better football than we have been doing. All the players he picked
yesterday perform much better for their club sides, and I think the reason for
that has to be the management and teamwork.
I just don't think it's true that other nations are hugely superior to us,
because I think if we had 11 players who played together regularly and as a
team, then we'd have a good shot at any nation in the world. That's not English
bias, because I think the same is true of practically any nation, for example,
Wales beating Belgium, Bulgaria beating France, (somewhere in Africa) beating
Germany.
I think therefore the blame has to be deposited at the feet of the FA, who
prevent there being a decent number of international matches by making us play
too many domestic matches, and the England manager, who really didn't make
anything of the opportunities he had to get us playing as a team. Constantly
picking different teams in order to adjust to the next opponent's style of play
is not the answer, and no-one but Taylor has ever thought it was.
Sign me up for the Tim Moran school of thought, FOAD Graham Taylor.
Mike
|
129.1118 | | BERN02::GOODEJ | | Thu Nov 18 1993 13:39 | 24 |
|
Re .1117
Tim,
Can't agree more about the lack of matches together. I alway though
it a bad move to scrap the "home" internationals, not just for us poor
relations, but England too. So I wholeheartedly agree with your point.
However, you yourself point out that Taylor's been trying to pick
the players and tactics for one match at a time. Instead of developing
a consistent style, we've been trying to firefight each team as they
came at us. Our players were playing sometimes out of position, with
little experience of playing together, with new tactics each game. Had
Taylor tried to develop a squad of players who consistantly perform
well things might have been different. He's had his chance and blown
it. Hopefully we'll see a "different" England in '96.
Surely now is a good time to bring the home internationals back
(sorry to keep harping on...). With England, Wales, N Ireland and
Scotland all out, they'll have some time on their hands next year
for a British tournament again!! (Why not invite France too??)
JBG
|
129.1119 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Fight the power | Thu Nov 18 1993 14:02 | 6 |
| We could have a football five nations championship, because France are out too.
Or perhaps a rival World Cup...
The possiblities are endless.
Mike
|
129.1120 | HA HA HA HA HA HA...:-) :-) | YELBUS::DSMITH | They've only played 10 seconds.. | Thu Nov 18 1993 14:05 | 16 |
|
Attention world, anyone know the whereabouts of Cosseyn, Barefield
and Waite? I'm already missing having a laugh at their inane ramblings,
come back guys, it's only a game!!!
Never mind, you'll have reason to celebrate in '96. Your team don't
need to qualify so at least you'll be there (for a week or 2 anyway).
Danny.
ps Who was the clown commentating on the BBC last night. After San
Marino hit the post in the 2nd half, he came out with the classic,
"they've almost done the impossible again". Oh, I forgot, nobody
is meant to score against Engerlands finest eleven.
|
129.1121 | But would England play at Twickers ?? | GYMAC::DCASSIDY | | Thu Nov 18 1993 14:05 | 7 |
|
NOT such a bad idea....a Five Nations Championship....
Starting at the end of the season and finishing before the June 17th...
Dezzz.
|
129.1122 | Desperate for a team to support | PEKING::WARBURTONG | Is it herbal deficiency Doc??! | Thu Nov 18 1993 14:16 | 2 |
|
Does anyone know how Australia got on last night ?
|
129.1123 | Those Oh-So-Humble Scots | PAVONE::TURNER | | Thu Nov 18 1993 14:18 | 20 |
| re: .1120
>Attention world, anyone know the whereabouts of Cosseyn, Barefield
>and Waite? I'm already missing having a laugh at their inane ramblings,
>come back guys, it's only a game!!!
Talking of inane ramblings, you seem to be going through a rare period
of form yourself at the moment. What about a nice constructive note in
128 telling us how you think Scotland are going to go about qualifying
for WC98 (or even EC96)? That's football, by the way, not tossing the
caber.
Good job you didn't qualify, actually. Craig Brown seems to be a fairly
pleasant character, but his name just doesn't scan with that classic
Scottish World Cup ditty "We're All Off With X's Army (And We'll Really
Shake Them Up When We Win The World Cup!)". At least Andy Roxburgh had
that going for him.
Dom
|
129.1124 | re .1122 Aussies | PLUNDR::MORAN | Better Dead than Smeg! | Thu Nov 18 1993 14:18 | 4 |
|
Beaten 1-0 (2-1 agg), as it says somewhere else in this conference.
Tim
|
129.1125 | | PEKING::WARBURTONG | Is it herbal deficiency Doc??! | Thu Nov 18 1993 14:24 | 6 |
|
WaiteG is suffering from a mystery illness so I'm afraid we will have
to do without his post match analysis.
Warburtong
|
129.1126 | Stick to your Morris dancing | YELBUS::DSMITH | They've only played 10 seconds.. | Thu Nov 18 1993 14:30 | 14 |
|
re .1123
Okay then, Scotland will qualify comfortably for the '96 Euro and the
'98 World Cup. How does that grab you?
By the way, the wonderful little ditty you're referring to has nothing
to do with Andy Roxburgh. It was penned in 1978 when Ally McLeod led
Scotland to glorious failure in the world cup finals in Argentina. Mind
you, as that was another feeble failure at qualifying by Engerlands
finest, you can be excused for not remembering.
Danny.
|
129.1127 | Stop this nonsense now | WOTVAX::GREENJA | Andy Green | Thu Nov 18 1993 14:39 | 17 |
|
I really can't believe anybody wants to revive the home internationals.
Surely the message from not qualifying for the World Cup is
that there is something inadequate in your system.
Virtually all the British teams players play regularly in the Premier
League, playing against each other again is going to achieve nothing
other than to convince one bunch of loosers that they are slightly
better than all the other loosers.
Do we really want to change or would we rather bury our heads in the
sand and tell ourselves that we really are great because we have
mastered the long ball game, fought our bollocks off, and won the
international equivalent of the Transit Van Windscreen Wiper Trophy.
Last nights performances were bad enough, please don't make it worse.
|
129.1128 | | FORTY2::ROBERTSON | | Thu Nov 18 1993 15:04 | 23 |
| I personally believe that resurrecting the Home internationals would be an
excellent idea. There is no pressure as far as qualification for WC/EC is
concerned, but on the other hand, the games won't be pointless as national pride
is at stake, so motivation will not be a problem.
The main benefit would be to allow the managers of the countries, to get the
players they want for a couple of weeks, without the pressures of the domestic
season, and build a unit that is used to being together 90% of the time.
England currently play 2 games after the season has finished in the highly
prestigous Rous Cup, which really fires up the imaginations of the population.
The Home internationals would produce far more interest. And with the emergence
of Wales, and NI since championships were canned, the likes of 1500 people at
Wrexham's ground would no longer occur.
On monday evening on R5 they were saying that it should be brought back with The
Republic of Ireland included, this would allow 2 home games per team per
tournament. I think the tournament should also be spread out over 2 weeks
instead of 1, and maybe only played once every 2 years!!
Bring it back!
Al
|
129.1129 | Yeah.... | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Thu Nov 18 1993 15:10 | 7 |
| ....and at the end of each yearly championship the best players
are picked for the British team that then play the internationals,
then we could have players like Giggs, Gascoine playing in the same team....
...and we might win something!
-Dom
|
129.1130 | '96 will be your year ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Thu Nov 18 1993 15:15 | 11 |
|
I won't say a word
.
Peter(An Impartail Celt)
P.S
In the words of great men,
TAYLOR FOAD.
|
129.1131 | They are Pros arn't they...? | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Thu Nov 18 1993 15:35 | 12 |
| Actually I dont think Taylor can be blamed for either of the San Marino
games.
He should have been able to pick any 11 players from the English
Premier division and they should have hammered a bunch of amatures.
Certainly not let in a goal within 10 seconds, in a game where they
were exepected to be smashing the early goals in......
The rest of the games, he should be shot for ...:-)
-Dom
|
129.1132 | World Cup Losers' Tournament? | FORTY2::ASH | Mail Interchange Group, Reading | Thu Nov 18 1993 15:49 | 8 |
| I think the Home Internationals should stay buried. Beating the likes of
Scotland and Wales isn't going to make us 'world-league' material. But
presumably the FA now has a bit of travel budget spare, so why not a short
tournament before the World Cup, so all the teams can get to play under their
new managers? Invite France, Denmark, and Portugal (e.g.) - all 4 teams can
use it to start to prepare for Euro-96.
grahame
|
129.1133 | | PEKING::WARBURTONG | Is it herbal deficiency Doc??! | Thu Nov 18 1993 15:51 | 3 |
|
Does all this make Taylor the worst England manager for three decades
or does that honour belong to Don Revie ?
|
129.1134 | Not the experience we need. | PAVONE::TURNER | | Thu Nov 18 1993 16:18 | 48 |
| Sorry, another vote against the Home Internationals! England, France
and Denmark (to name but three) will probably receive umpteen
invitations for friendly matches between now and next June, from
countries who have qualified and want to put their teams to the test
before WC94. They'll want to see how their players fare at Wembley or
at Parc-des-Princes in front of a packed (debatable!) crowd.
England should use these friendlies as a step to rebuilding/learning
rather than just a means of recouping the millions lost by not
qualifying for the US. This goes for the other countries as well;
Scotland or Wales would gain more valid experience from a friendly
against Colombia or Cameroun than they would from playing England.
We know that our players can cope with opponents who run for
90 minutes, jump for every ball, tackle back in their opponents' half
of the field, etc. What they need to improve at is the sort of one-touch
midfield play that Portugal displayed for an hour against Italy last
night.
Re: .1126
>By the way, the wonderful little ditty you're referring to has nothing
>to do with Andy Roxburgh. It was penned in 1978 when Ally McLeod led
>Scotland to glorious failure in the world cup finals in Argentina.
Oh dear, it's not just the fundamentals of spelling/punctuation that
you haven't come to terms with; the old reading skills are a bit rusty
too, aren't they? The "X" inserted in the song title should be
substituted by the appropriate name (be it "Ally" or "Andy"). I fully
remember Ally McLeod - I sincerely felt for the guy at the time. God
knows, *he* wasn't the one boasting that Scotland were going to conquer
the world.
>Okay then, Scotland will qualify comfortably for the '96 Euro and the
>'98 World Cup. How does that grab you?
That's more like it! I've even written a new verse for you (they don't call
me McCartney for nothing!):
"And we'll really shake them up
When we QUALIFY for the European Championships
Cause Scotland are the greatest football team".
What 'yer mean, it's got to rhyme?
Dom
|
129.1135 | I believe they can erase bad memories using hypnosis | BERN01::BOLGER | Jerry Bolger. | Thu Nov 18 1993 16:41 | 13 |
| Re: Mr. Waite's Mystery Illness.
Well, I can only say that I'm very glad to hear that Gary has finally
sought treatment for his problem. It's widely accepted that actually
admitting that you have a psychological problem is the first step
towards finding a cure.
Wishing you a speedy recovery on behalf of all the Irish friends you've
made through this confernce,
Jerry.
|
129.1136 | We're off to the USA!! | ESSB::MCUNNIFFE | Even Better than the Real Thing | Thu Nov 18 1993 21:04 | 14 |
|
Hard luck on your lads for not making it to the finals. Looks
like our lads will have to keep the flag flying for the countries this side
of the world. Its off to the USA for Bonner, Irwin, Phelan, Whelan, Moran,
Staunton, Keane, Aldridge, etc. I'm sure both of you will be supporting our
lads.
Look on the bright side of things. You will not have a problem qualifying
for the 1996 Euro finals.
CUNNO
|
129.1137 | | GALVIA::SPAIN | signed long gary(); | Thu Nov 18 1993 21:07 | 7 |
|
>Its off to the USA for Bonner, Irwin, Phelan, Whelan, Moran,
^^^^^^
I very much doubt it. Anyway this should be in topic 130.
Gary.
|
129.1138 | | GALVIA::SPAIN | signed long gary(); | Thu Nov 18 1993 21:09 | 11 |
|
Plenty has already been said about the games. I didn't see either and
only heard the first half of San Marino v England on the radio.
Best comment of the night was from the BBC commentator. Just after the
San Marino goal he said
"I keep expecting Jeremy Beadle to appear and then we'll start
properly"
Gary.
|
129.1139 | It's a "Brit" problem.... | PAKORA::CDOUDIE | | Thu Nov 18 1993 21:34 | 45 |
| >>I think the Home Internationals should stay buried. Beating the likes of
>>Scotland and Wales isn't going to make us 'world-league' material. But
Arrogance or what, just a touch mind you........remember when we contested
the first Rous cup and who had the total cheek to beat the team who put
it up for grabs, we're all in the same boat just now...OUT of the World
Cup.
>>presumably the FA now has a bit of travel budget spare, so why not a short
>>tournament before the World Cup, so all the teams can get to play under their
>>new managers? Invite France, Denmark, and Portugal (e.g.) - all 4 teams can
>>use it to start to prepare for Euro-96.
Do these teams want to play in a tournament with the way the minority of
english 'hooligans' (notice did not say fans) behave.
and another small point, most of the skillful players that are on the
tips of everyone's tongue who play in the english premier are 'foreign',
i.e. Cantona,Giggs,Hughes,McAllister,Strachan,Rush and the successful
teams of the previous years had a smattering of 'foreign' players in
their teams and of course the King of them all......
...Kenny...
Goalies, Schmiecal(sp), Southall, Grobbelar.
A few exceptions, Waddle, if you wanted pinpoint crosses why wasn't he
playing, Barnes, in his prime, Hoddle, probably the best passer of the
ball the game has ever seen and just didn't fit in to the international
set up, the same with Waddle.
Your two 'best' of the current crop, play in the Italian league and
even they can't turn it on every game.
So that's part of the problem, you just haven't got enough class players
to be a good team at the moment.
This is one of the reasons the Italians blame for not reaching the Euro
Finals last time, not enough young talent getting their chance. They've
done something about it, limiting foreigners is one and their team must
be one of the favourites now to win now.
Did I say SMALL point ???
a sensible note from me...I don't believe it !!!!! 8*/
colin.
|
129.1140 | Times are a changin' | KERNEL::WITHALLG | Wait Till They Getta Loada Me | Thu Nov 18 1993 23:32 | 16 |
|
"a goal worthy of superior opposition"
"they've almost done the impossible again"
Did we have a laugh at those ones. The superior opposition are all
going to the world cup. We won't be scoring past them for a while to
come. And as for little San Marino ! - they did Holland proud. They
played to the best of their ability which is more than what I can say
for my country folk. I see more passion on a Sunday afternoon in the
park.
Wake up and smell the coffee England. 1966 is long gone. Earn the
respect.
Gazzer - An Englishman.
|
129.1141 | No | PAKORA::AMILLAR | And some late news just in... | Fri Nov 19 1993 03:09 | 11 |
|
Re - Home Internationals and other games.
Is anybody really interested in these games, and I include the players
in this? It's bad enough trying to get the primadonnas(sp) to turn up
for meaningless World Cup qualifiers without asking them to be fit for
games that are friendlies. The passion even went out of the Scotland v
England match a long time ago.
Archie
|
129.1142 | Scotland v England | KIRKTN::JCRONIN | HMFC | Fri Nov 19 1993 08:20 | 11 |
| I beg to differ,I do not believe the passion died for Scotland v
England games.I reckon if there was a Scotland V England game next
Saturday at Wembley there would be 100,000 Scots outside the Stadium,
with or without tickets.What killed this game off was the playing of
the match on a Wednesday night in London,and also a victory for the
yobbo's after the last game in Glasgow.The passion was still there then
because on that Saturday I had to get my Tickets sent from Kent as they
were so scarce up here.
Ferry Jambo.
|
129.1143 | the day baxter sat on the ball | KIRKTN::JCRONIN | HMFC | Fri Nov 19 1993 09:39 | 7 |
| Re .1139 Arrogance or Not...
Remember who was the first team to beat England at Wembley after your 1966
cup triumph.
SCOTLAND.
Ferry Jambo.
|
129.1144 | | LARVAE::MUNSON_P | Human = Ape + Attitude | Fri Nov 19 1993 17:08 | 13 |
129.1145 | | TRUCKS::SANT | so near yet sofa... | Fri Nov 19 1993 19:57 | 25 |
|
We took one point from Norway. One point from Holland. We got what
we deserved - bugger all.
Graham Taylor is a numpty but then so are most of the crowd that
surround him and speak in his defence. The time to shoot him is not
now...let him suffer a while first, then appoint someone with a
clear mission once the fog of frustration and anger has cleared.
The next England COACH needs to be someone who has experience of
playing, and ideally also coaching, the game at the highest level
in this country ie. Div1 (old money) or Premier League.
A few potentials spring to mind, but for heavens sake it doesn't
matter all that much. What we must do is appoint someone who is
LUCKY! Taylor is not nor never has been lucky.
Believe it or believe it not, but I'm actually relieved we're out.
A good old purge will do wonders for the future. What is vital is
that we do actually have a purge, and that it happens throughout
the echelons of power in the FA. Using Taylor as a patsy for the
woes of the national game's infrastructure is, frankly, unfair.
Andy.
|
129.1146 | | DCEIDL::HINXMAN | In the range of strange | Sat Nov 20 1993 00:25 | 12 |
| re .1142
> with or without tickets.What killed this game off was the playing of
> the match on a Wednesday night in London,and also a victory for the
> yobbo's after the last game in Glasgow.The passion was still there then
I'd reckon that the destruction of the Wembley turf by Scottish
supporters and other public order problems resulting from the
"visit" by Scottish supporters were high on the list of reasons
the Home Internationals were abandoned.
Tony
|
129.1147 | Holland Holland Holland Holland | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Mon Nov 22 1993 11:18 | 12 |
| Hi Guys,
just returned from Poland, 18.000 Dutch supporters and almost nothing bad
happened, great great great, I'm already looking for a trip next summer
to the US of A.
Gary,
I've got ya a program for your collection.
T_
|
129.1148 | | PEKING::COSSEYN | | Mon Nov 22 1993 12:05 | 6 |
|
Anyone who thinks English football is in decline should watch
Newcastle game yesterday. 11 English players playing the game
how it should be played..... Great performance....
Neil...
|
129.1149 | I don't think so | FORTY2::ROBERTSON | | Mon Nov 22 1993 13:10 | 12 |
|
re .1146
> I'd reckon that the destruction of the Wembley turf by Scottish
> supporters and other public order problems resulting from the
> "visit" by Scottish supporters were high on the list of reasons
> the Home Internationals were abandoned.
Why then did they keep the England - Scotland fixture going 4/5 years after the
home internationals were abandoned???
Al
|
129.1150 | Good , bad , ugly ? | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Mon Nov 22 1993 13:11 | 13 |
|
re: -1
Agree wholeheartedly. A brilliant display of what English football can
be. A pleasure to watch. Newcastle fans should watch out, Keegan's team is
playing him into the England job.
Just as a matter of interest, anybody read that F.I.F.A are going to
insist that Great Britain play as one team for the next World Cup in
France ? Rumour Rumour Rumour !!!!
Copell(sp. ?) odds on for England. Good or bad ?
Peter(An Impartial Celt).
|
129.1151 | Oh Libero.... | GYMAC::DCASSIDY | | Mon Nov 22 1993 14:21 | 21 |
|
Newcastle played very entertaining football yesterday and
wholeheartedly deserved to win. But look how the goals came about...
To try an put an analogy on that performance against what England would
have done is a little premature. NO top international side would have
conceded those goals because...and it has been said before...in
England, the sweeper (libero) system hardly exists. NONE of those goals
would have come about if a decent sweeper had been incorporated. In
fact before the game started I could see Liverpool getting a thrashing.
All 4 Liverpool defenders were caught square on numerous occasions.
Look at the goals England conceded in the group matches that cost them
dearly. Both against Norway in Oslo and the Bergkamp's at Wembley
probably avoided by incorporating a sweeper.
Bobby Robson maybe was starting to get the right idea at the wrong
time !!
Dezzz.
|
129.1152 | | FORTY2::ASH | Mail Interchange Group, Reading | Tue Nov 23 1993 16:02 | 24 |
| Just to come back to the England-Scotland games (I couldn't possibly comment
on the wonderfulness of Newcastle United), as someone mentioned, there's no
shortage of passion. And that's the point. Successive England managers (and
possibly Scottish ones too) said that there always was too much passion for a
game which was meaningless in the greater scheme of things (Europe, World
Cups).
Whether we beat Scotland or not would certainly get people motivated, but if
we want to become a World (or even European) power at football, we have to
play the sort of game which is going to beat the majority of those sides.
Sadly, playing against British teams is not going to get us that. Even more
sadly, we haven't got enough class players RIGHT NOW to beat the sides going
to the USA either.
So England has to use the next 2 years to prepare for that. However, all the
comments emanating from the FA these days show no sign of them changing. I
wouldn't be at all surprised if they announce that the tactics advocated by
Charles Hughes ('statistics prove that most goals come from Route 1 football'
- not a direct quote!) haven't been given a fair trial! We need a manager
who'll really try to put them into practice - after all Taylor was in danger
of playing rather too much football at times (games against Holland and Poland
at Wembley e.g.). So, I think the time could be right for Dave Bassett!!
grahame
|
129.1153 | Ditto! | PAVONE::TURNER | | Tue Nov 23 1993 16:13 | 14 |
| Grahame,
That's pretty much the point I was trying to get across in .1134(?).
British players don't really have too much to learn from each other.
I'm sure Brazilian football would go right down the drain if they
isolated themselves from the rest of the world, prevented their players
from playing overseas, etc.
People on the Continent would doubtless admire the passion (read
"ferocity"!), the pomp and the ceremony of an England-Scotland fixture.
But I seriously doubt that they would be particularly concerned with it
as a football fixture.
Dom
|
129.1154 | ? about last. | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Tue Nov 23 1993 16:36 | 14 |
|
re: -last
Dom,
I don't know what it means but is it not true that in the time
that Brazilian players have been playing overseas , they have failed
to win a World Cup ? I'm not sure but I don't think many played
in Europe pre 1970.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Peter(An Impartial Celt)
|
129.1155 | | PAVONE::TURNER | | Tue Nov 23 1993 16:43 | 14 |
| Peter,
No, the point I was making was practically the opposite, i.e. Brazilian
football *would* doubtless go down the drain if their players (e.g.
Careca, Alemao, Bebeto, etc. in Italy/Spain/Germany) *stopped* playing
abroad. Isolation cannot benefit the football of any country.
By the way, I liked your gastronomic football note yesterday (in 130?),
but you completely forgot to mention a "pot-pourri" of styles and "X
split the defence like a knife through butter".
Still, promises well for the future of football journalism!
Dom
|
129.1156 | Si, I understand Senor ! | ESSB::PHAYDEN | | Tue Nov 23 1993 16:59 | 17 |
|
Dom,
Yeah, I understood the context of your note, and the point that I was
making was that since Brazialians have *started* playing in Europe
the team has *stopped* winning the World Cup i.e post 1970.
Isolation seemed to benefit them !!!
Maybe it was because they were an unknown quantity or because they had
the best players the world has seen ?
Didn't Brazil try to adopt a European style a few years back to
accomadate their ex-pats but have now switched again to their
tradtional style ?
Peter(You Know who).
|
129.1157 | Exit left.... | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Wed Nov 24 1993 13:25 | 3 |
| Taylor and Mcmennemmmmy resigned today according to VTX news....
-Dom (the other one)
|
129.1158 | | FORTY2::ROBERTSON | | Wed Nov 24 1993 15:28 | 1 |
| A bit late. see 326.*
|
129.1159 | I wanted confirmation..... | GVA05::BURKHALTER | | Wed Nov 24 1993 17:28 | 3 |
| Its only true when it appears in VTX....
-Dom :-)
|
129.1160 | | GALVIA::SPAIN | signed long gary(); | Sat Nov 27 1993 19:10 | 10 |
|
This time 2 years ago I received an internal mail envelope with
pictures of Gary Lineker's equaliser v Poland and comments along the
lines of "We're going to Sweden you're not." Needless to say they were
much appreciated. Unfortunately the sender forgot to include his name
and address. I would like to return the favour so if the person in
question would care to mail me I can send photographs of Alan
McLoughlin's goal v Northern Ireland and Denis Bergkamp in return.
Gary.
|