T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
117.1 | ?? | PCOJCT::THOMAS | | Thu Mar 08 1990 18:56 | 1 |
|
|
117.3 | | CHFS32::HMONTGO | | Thu Mar 08 1990 21:08 | 7 |
| re: .2
Thank you for correcting me. I did mean '91 cards, and thank
you for the very informative reply.
Ben
|
117.4 | | CSC32::G_GEIGER | Ahhh, too much fruit... | Fri Mar 09 1990 00:02 | 7 |
| I heard on the radio that the owners said that they
would open up the camps, if the players agreed to not
strike, and the union said something to the effect of,
"up yours!"
Who's to blame now!!!!
GG
|
117.6 | | AKOV12::GASPARONI | | Fri Mar 09 1990 16:05 | 24 |
| I think it would be nice to see a set like the quality 53T set made
with artistic qualities. Since 1955, I think the set have been boring,
with no imagination! I think I'm going to stick with sets prior to
1956, and the heck with the new stuff. They will also have to start
making sets which include the owners, those terrible owners, those money
hungry, money mongers, who have no feelings for the fan or card
collectors, or even card companies for that matter. What is baseball
coming too?? Lock out leads to Strike, which leads to a very boring
summer, without baseball. I'm on the side of the players, the owners
have kept them down long enough, their is Millions of dollars in
Revenues coming in from TV, cable, promotions, and expansion, so why
not spread it around. I don't understand why the players, if there so
intelligent, don't start there own league, kick out the owners, and get
all the lawyers together, and start one united league, NO OWNERS. Look
at DEC, we started our own softball league, we don't have owners. All
you need is one united body to govern the whole mess, rent and lease
the ballparks, share in the consession proceeds, and promotional
aspects, and we the fan wouldn't have to put up with all this salary
nonsense every two to three years. I'm tired of it, and won't pay to
see a game anymore because its against my principle to pay for
something that is so messed up. The last time I paid $9.00 per seat
at Fenway, I felt terrible. Why am I paying $18 for tickets, 8.00 for
parking, $2.65 for tolls, and $5 for gas to get in here, to watch these
over priced premadonnas?
|
117.7 | playball??? | IMPULS::MCDONOUGH | | Sat Mar 10 1990 23:39 | 10 |
| Does anyone think that the prices of the '90 cards will generaly
be lower?(like the '86 cards)
I agree that the players are being a little babyish about this lock
out. The owners offered to open the camps but the players said
no. What are they fighting for? Bigger pensions? Just one question,
what do the guys with the million dollar contracts need with a pension.
-Bonnie-
|
117.9 | | DEALIN::DIFONZO | | Mon Mar 12 1990 11:24 | 11 |
| re Strike
Bill Conlan a sports writer from Philadelphia believes the owners are
trying to break the union just as the NFL owners did.
As far as cards go, the rookie values can be affected either way.
Certainly no rookie will have a Mark McQwire type rookie season, but if
a rookie has a great 2/3 of a season, investors will be speculating
what said rookie can do with a full season under his belt.
John
|
117.10 | Ban Spring Training Photos! | NUTMEG::JACUNSKI | | Mon Mar 12 1990 13:41 | 17 |
| Roy's reminder that the card companies would normally take the photos
for the 1991 cards during the 1990 spring training just points out how
inexcusable the number of error cards is. They've got SEVEN MONTHS in
which to get things straight. Also, the spring training photos strike
me as kind of artificial, especially now that they're used almost
exclusively. I'd much prefer to see some action shots with recognizable
portions of real big league parks in the background. Fleer does this
occasionally, as I can remember seeing the green monster in the
background here and there.
As for the lockout, I understand the players at least offered a
compromise of 2and1/2 years before arbitration. To which the owners
offered to open camps in return for a no-strike promise. Since the
strike is the players' only leverage, I can't blame them for not
accepting.
Rick
|
117.11 | SOFTBALL UNIFORMS | NEADEV::GROARK | | Mon Mar 12 1990 17:50 | 12 |
| There was an article in the Boston Herald yesterday (Mike Shalin?)
speculating that the owners were playing this whole thing like a
violin. Their intention being to destroy the union.
It's all TRASH! Play ball.
I can't stand the pictures taken in spring training! The players
are wearing those "fake" softball shirts. The 1990 Upper Deck Ellis
Burks card would be a nice picture if he played in the DEC softball
league.
John G.
|
117.12 | GREEEEDY CRYBABIES | EBBV03::MONDALTO | | Tue Mar 13 1990 10:56 | 24 |
|
Mike Andrews (ex sox player) was on a radio show yesterday with
Loren & Wally WVBF 105 to give his input on the strike. He said
that he never thought he would say this but,he has to agree with
the owners on this one. Every ball player today is a millionaire,and
if he's not he will be in due time. The ball players are getting to
greedy,and are not concerned about (JOE PUBLIC) who pays their
salaries. If these BUMS,and CRYBABIES get what they want,you know
who'll be paying for it don't you ? These guys are in their early
and mid 20's,and the majority of them have college degrees,and when
their carreer is over,I'm pretty sure they won't have a hard time
looking for a job that pays,and has good benefits. I'm just getting
sick and tired of listening to this BULLSHIT about their families
future. They got you comming and going no matter how you look at it.
Baseball card shows,try to get a free autograph for your kid,if you
don't have $8.00 and up,they can care less about YOU and your KID(s).
Why don't the Commisioner start throwing his weight around and do
something about this strike.
|
117.13 | Power to the People | CLOVE::JACUNSKI | | Tue Mar 13 1990 12:14 | 17 |
| The only "strike" going on is by the Greyhound bus drivers. The
"lockout" has been called by the owners, and since the commissioner is
an employee of the owners, he doesn't have much weight to throw around.
I too find it hard to have much sympathy for the Will Clarks, and have
even less for people like $900,000 Neal Heaton (check his stats) but
I'm not sure if "most" ballplayers are millionaires, and I'd be willing
to bet that the percentage of college grads is lower in baseball than
in football. Whatever we call it, though - lockout, strike, etc - it
means there's no baseball going on. Fans have no say in the matter
because they're not ORGANIZED! A nationwide organization of fans and
cards collectors could conceivably bring sufficient pressure to bear by
vowing to boycott games, networks that carry games, and licensed
products for a certain length of time. You sound pissed enough to
start such a union, John. If you do, I'll sign up!
P.S. Maybe the Society for American Baseball Research (SABR) could be a
starting point. Hmmmm.
|
117.15 | play ball or start football early | GUCCI::SVILLARI | | Thu Mar 15 1990 17:29 | 12 |
| If the players are so concerned about pensions why don't they just
go out and have great seasons after they have loaded up on their
own baseball cards? This way they can ensure money for themselves
in the future by selling their cards. The better they play now,
the more they can make hawking their autographed junk on the home
shopping network ala rose, palmer, and uecker. I have stopped caring
about the Phillies long ago(for obvious reasons), the strike just
amplifies my feelings against them. I will be going to minor leagueand
local school games this summer. My nephew even plays a better caliber
of ball considering that he has to pay them to play!!
sv
|
117.16 | | DEALIN::DIFONZO | | Thu Mar 15 1990 18:26 | 3 |
| I don't think Bob Ueker is a good example for your agument.
John
|
117.18 | Uecker | GUCCI::SVILLARI | | Fri Mar 16 1990 16:32 | 2 |
| Then I guess the prices I saw on his old Topp's cards were out of
line: Phillies catcher card for $75.
|
117.19 | | WHELIN::DIFONZO | | Fri Mar 16 1990 17:39 | 8 |
| I meant that Uecker is not a good example of a player loading up on his
cards, going out and having a good career and making money off his
cards. Look at his stats. Uecker said ( on WMIII ) , tongue in cheek,
that he was glad he didn't do well as a ball player because it would
mess him up now. Bob Uecker is an exception because he makes fun of his
mediocre career, that was the point I was trying to make.
John
|
117.20 | Good Point!! | GUCCI::SVILLARI | | Fri Mar 16 1990 17:55 | 3 |
| I agree. He is kind of the antithesis to the argument I was making.
Good point...sv
|