Title: | Mathematics at DEC |
Moderator: | RUSURE::EDP |
Created: | Mon Feb 03 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2083 |
Total number of notes: | 14613 |
I'm not sure if this is the right conference but seeing that my problem is math-related I'll try. I work is personnel and perform demographic studies on populations within DEC. I follow such things as hiring, terminations, retirements, growth, and internal movement. I have a few questions/problems on how things are currently calculated and wanted to get some opinions to either back my ideas or prove me wrong. There are two main areas that I need feedback on: 1) For hiring, termination, or retirements: the rates are currently calculated as: New Hires or New Terms or New Retire ------------------------------------ = Hiring, Term, or Retire Rate Average Population (Prev+Present/2) This doesn't make sense to me for some reason. I think that the denominator should be the base population only: New Hires or New Terms or New Retire ------------------------------------ = Hiring, Term, or Retire Rate Previous (base) population 2) Measuring internal movement within a population (termed Churnover) is a highly debated topic. Not many people agree on a method. I can't even describe the present method. Right now Churnover is calculated by: (position change + group change - overlap figure - new hires) ------------------------------------------------------------- Average Population I, myself, have no great idea on how to measure 'internal movement'. I hope that some people may have some ideas. My closest guess (simplistic) would be: Int. transfers into Pop. + Hires + Int. trans. out + Term + Ret --------------------------------------------------------------- Previous (Base) Population If anyone has any ideas, or other notes conferences to turn to please let me know. Thank you for your help, Don
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1014.1 | $$?? | AKQJ10::YARBROUGH | I prefer Pi | Wed Jan 18 1989 14:50 | 41 |
> For hiring, termination, or retirements: the rates are currently > calculated as: > > New Hires or New Terms or New Retire > ------------------------------------ = Hiring, Term, or Retire Rate > Average Population (Prev+Present/2) > > This doesn't make sense to me for some reason. I think that the > denominator should be the base population only: > > New Hires or New Terms or New Retire > ------------------------------------ = Hiring, Term, or Retire Rate > Previous (base) population For a very large company it probably doesn't matter which formula you use, but for a startup the latter version blows up (division by zero), so it makes sense to stick with the first version. > ... Right now Churnover is > calculated by: > > (position change + group change - overlap figure - new hires) > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Average Population > > I, myself, have no great idea on how to measure 'internal movement'. > I hope that some people may have some ideas. My closest guess > (simplistic) would be: > > Int. transfers into Pop. + Hires + Int. trans. out + Term + Ret > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Previous (Base) Population By definition the internal transfers in and out should be identical. I assume what is important is the processing cost of each change in job, and an internal transfer therefore costs roughly twice as much as a new hire. However, I must admit that I don't know what you are trying to measure and for what purpose, and I don't know what all the terms mean, so I don't have much to add. Lynn Yarbrough |