T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
148.1 | Oh yeah... | ULTRA::BUTCHART | | Mon Aug 11 1986 14:43 | 5 |
| I forgot to mention that the water problem was probably aggravated
some years back when a previous owner removed the gutters in the
front, greatly increasing the amount of water falling onto the porch.
/D
|
148.2 | Replace it in pieces | WHOARU::HARDING | | Thu Aug 14 1986 17:06 | 5 |
| Have you considered replacing the sill in two pieces ? That way
you would not be removing all support at once. Thats what I did
when I replaced the sill on the pantry of my house.
dave
|
148.3 | Fortunately it's small | ULTRA::BUTCHART | | Fri Aug 15 1986 19:36 | 15 |
| Re .-1;
Fortunately, the rotted section looks to be only about 10 feet in
total length, right behind and a foot or so to either side of the
porch, so I only have a small section to replace (assuming I find
no other great surprises when I open things up).
One piece of advice I got is that I should nail a 2x6 or 2x8 across
the face of the house a couple of studs on either side beyond the
section I'm replacing. That will act as a temporary "flying brace"
to prevent sagging. (I should have thought of that. It's the same
thing you do when cutting a new window opening to brace the wall
before you build the frame.)
/Butch
|
148.4 | what about no still? | SVCRUS::KROLL | | Fri Aug 15 1986 20:05 | 6 |
| I found a place where there is no still under my kitchen. The
rafters are just sitting there on top of the bricks. Also to top
it off there is only one row of bricks.
The question that comes to my mind is that would the rafters sitting
on top of the bricks grind the bricks down when you are walking
on the floor?
|
148.5 | Done, done, and done | ULTRA::BUTCHART | | Sun Aug 31 1986 14:00 | 59 |
| Well, I DID IT! Turned out to be fairly simple, but strenuous work.
I opened up the face of the house around the porch, removing the
clapboards and sheathing (1x6 rough fir, lots easier to remove the
right bits than if it had been sheathed in plywood). I also removed
the vertical trim boards from the door.
For partial support, I got a 2x6 that extended 2 studs beyond the
rotted area on either side and nailed that across the face of the
house into the studs, 2 12d nails per stud. From under the basement
I stacked wood blocks on top of the major cross beams close to the
foundation wall and wedged them up to provide some extra support
to the load bearing walls running on top of the beams (these were
those two beams crossing either side of the center of the basement,
see my crude drawing in .0). As a precaution I rented a couple
of 15 ton jacks and had a heavy support beam ready, though it turned
out that the house face was supported well enough that that wasn't
required.
I rented a Sawz-all, a highly efficient piece of compact destruction,
for the removal of the old stuff. I drilled starter holes thru
the sill beams a good foot beyond the signs of water damage, then
cut out the sill in chunks. Every couple of feet I threw in a
temporary bracing wall of paired 2x4 beams with lots of short 2x4
studs. That took about 3-4 hours for the 10 foot section I was
getting rid of. The wood in the worst sections had degenerated
to a fairly poor grade of soil, complete with earthworms. Fortunately
no sign of carpenter ants or termites, and the rot had not gotten
up into the floor.
A good, strong friend came over the next day, and we cut new 2x6s
to fit on top of the foundation wall (easy), then a new 2x10 to
go on top of those. All pressure treated lumber, I hasten to add.
The hard part, because of the limited space we were working in,
was to get the 2x10 upright. We had to fit it in tilted and then
use a sledge and blocks to horse it upright. After some discussion,
we cut a small bevel on one edge of the beam to reduce the resistance
to getting it upright. Since the edge is still a little over an
inch wide, I don't believe I lost any significant load bearing
capability. After that it was basically a matter of toenailing,
fitting in some angle braces and straps where it was too tight to
wield a hammer but (just barely) wide enough for screwdriver work,
and now I start caulking, putting back the sheathing boards (I'm
using pressure treated behind and to either side of the porch) and
flashing the thing so the water can't get back behind the porch.
(Even if I am using P.T. lumber, I see no reason to really stress
the warranty.)
Total cost, about $280, of which around $90 was in precautionary
material I wound up not needing, and since I was in a hurry to get
it done while we had this unaccustomed good weather, I did not shop
around for the best wood prices, but just went to a place (Moore's
in Ayer) where I knew I could get all the stuff at one sweep. This
is against a couple of quotes of $1,000 to 2,000 just based on
description of the problem ("and it will probably be more once we
actually see it") and ("I can fit you in next spring") from the
only ones who even returned calls before I decided to DYI.
/Dave
|
148.6 | Postscript | NATASH::BUTCHART | | Wed Sep 03 1986 16:08 | 18 |
| And, as always, the most interesting (read: troublesome) parts
involved not the foundation itself, but side bits. Such as:
o the Sawsall is neat. It cuts through nails, bolts--and wires
to the outside light. Oops. Fishing a new wire from the switch
to the box in the basement and connecting it up again took
another couple hours.
o the sheathing was 1x6. Hm--pressure treated wood only comes
5/4" widths, not 1". Another 2-4 hours spent kerfing the
boards to the correct width, then chipping out the sections and
planing it more or less smooth. All of you who are into
aerobic home renovation, take note: I am sure the caloric
expenditure for hewing PT wood with a hand rasp is _at least_
500 per hour.
Signed,
Loving Helpmate, Board Holder, Painter & Cheerleader
|
148.22 | cutting open a foundation | AKOV04::KALINOWSKI | | Tue Nov 25 1986 15:55 | 14 |
| i am in the process of having a two car garage with a room upstairs
attached to my house. because it was never planned when it was built,
i must have the foundation cut for a door opening into the garage
from downstairs (the house is a split level). does anyone know of
someone in the groton/nashua area that cuts concrete walls?
I also hear you can rent these machines from a rental place, but
that they do not do as good of a job since the pros use some kind
of a machine that uses water at the same time to get a smooth cut.
Is there a limit to the width that the rental machines cut? my house
foundation is about 10" thick.
thanks
john
|
148.23 | EXACTLY what I am doing. | NETCOM::HARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Wed Nov 26 1986 16:14 | 9 |
| Sounds like EXACTLY what I am in process of doing. Nashua Coring
gave me an estimate of 350.00 which is there min charge.
If you find anything else, post it here. I too have a split
with a newly attached garage, and need to cut a foundation
door in.
Mark
|
148.24 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Wed Nov 26 1986 16:17 | 3 |
| I think there are some other notes about concrete cutting in this
file someplace - anybody know the numbers?
|
148.25 | #145 | PLANET::DIGIORGIO | He who proposes, does | Wed Nov 26 1986 17:17 | 3 |
| Check out note #145 in this file for more info on concrete cutting.
Jim.
|
148.26 | thanks | AKOV04::KALINOWSKI | | Tue Dec 09 1986 19:32 | 4 |
| thanks for all the advice. im going to have a professional cut it
as i don't have the time to do it myself.
john
|
148.27 | belatedelyly another input | RSTS32::BROWN | | Fri Dec 12 1986 14:29 | 14 |
| I think your decision to have a professional cut it is an excellent
one based on my experience... I had a pro (solberg Inc) come in
with their equiptment the same time a neghbor started cutting his
foundation with a rental saw. The pro was done in a couple of hours
(set up time,cutting and cleanup) my neighbors took several days(
problem with the saw, dulled blades ect..) The cement on both was
10 in. and about 6 years in age(hardness).
As a suggeston only be prepared to dispose of th slabe of cement
or ask the cutters to break it up???
good luck
canuck
|
148.29 | Foundation leak | EXODUS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Fri Dec 19 1986 11:54 | 11 |
| Last nite it rained and this morning I once again had some puddles in my
cellar. I know the where the water is coming from and want to fix it
once and for all. It turns out that there is a very small leak where
the waste pipe exits the foundation. Since it's only a couple of feet
below the surface, I plan to dig it up and seal it up where the pipe
enters the wall. It's PVC...
Has anyone done this before? What did you use for a sealant? I would
suspect foundation tar might be the thing, but all opinions are welcome!
-mark
|
148.30 | SEALERS?? | BURREN::WATERSJ | THE LEGEND OF THE LAKES | Fri Dec 19 1986 13:09 | 10 |
| Quick honey......Help me get the table saw up into the kitchen :^)
I have the same problem but my leak is from one of those foundation
pins! I sealed the inside cellar door I just but up with a sealer
made by Red Devil...it dries as hard as a rock! I may give that
a try. J. Waters
|
148.31 | FAST PLUG THEN TAR | NETCOM::HARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Fri Dec 19 1986 13:10 | 8 |
| I have seen it done by the 'pros' and they did as you suggest, they
dug up the dirt on the outside, around the area, but they then chipped
away the cement (mortar) where the pipe enters the foundation. Then,
using FASTPLUG (Quick drying cement) they filled it up and made
it real nice. THEN TAR.
Mark
|
148.32 | Use Hydraulic cement instead of tar | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Fri Dec 19 1986 14:51 | 4 |
| The leaks around the foundation pins should be sealed with Hydraulic
cement. Besides it working well, it will look a lot better on the
inside than tar or roofing cement.
|
148.33 | while we're on the subject | EXODUS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Fri Dec 19 1986 16:17 | 15 |
| re: -1
On the subject of hydrolic cement, I have this one big crack from floor
to ceiling that was sealed with the stuff on the inside. It has since
opened and it too leaks some. However, I don't even want to think about
trying to dig down 8 feet to seal it. I had been told by some people
that you cannot successfully seal the inside and that you must go
outside.
Are you saying there's hope for a good seal doing it from the inside or
is that really only for the holes from the pins? I can see where one of
these holes would be a lot less likely to open as opposed to a crack
and that may be the secret.
-mark
|
148.34 | sealing concrete | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Fri Dec 19 1986 17:50 | 12 |
| I don't think anything will be strong enough to pull together two
slabs that are drifting apart for one reason or another. If the
ground under a floor settles and cracks the floor, hydraulic cement
can fill the crack so it doesn't leak as long as the crack doesn't
increase even more.
With the pin holes, there's not much pressure making the
hole bigger so hydraulic cement will work.
I think the major reason why those pin holes leak is that when they're
broken off, they're often forced loose from the concrete. Once
any hole there is plugged with either tar or hydraulic concrete,
I doubt if it would leak again from the same spot.
|
148.35 | GE Silicon | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Mon Dec 22 1986 12:57 | 9 |
| I've used GE Silicon for these types of leaks in the wall with good
results. Unlike hard cements, it will flex as the space between
the pipe and the wall or the pin and the wall expands and contracts
with tempature changes. You may have to chip away some cement first
to create a nice pocket. And be sure to clean the surfaces GOOD,
especially the cement dust.
Charly
|
148.36 | The positive side of a leak | MAGIC::COTE | | Tue Dec 23 1986 14:27 | 42 |
| I had a crack in my foundation right behind some pre-cast front
steps. The crack ran all the way from the sill to the footing and
it leaked pretty bad. The previous owner chiselled out the crack
on the inside and filled it with hydraulic cement (plug) which cracked.
I called a foundation coating/waterproofing company in Manchester,
NH and asked for advice. Their first words were, "You can't fix
it from the inside, you need to correct the problem on the POSITIVE
side of the leak." They proceeded to tell me how to do it myself.
The method called for exposing the foundation (a real problem for
me because of the front steps, but I did move them), and to chisel
out a deep V along the crack. Next, use a caulking product called
PTV (I think that's the name) available at Corriveau-Routhier for
about $10 a tube. (You'll need to buy a special primer for the
application below grade for about $15 a quart). They were pretty
specific about applying the caulk from the BOTTOM of the crack up
to eliminate air pockets. Then once the caulk is dry, you tar the
whole thing and put an 18" wide piece of the thickest plastic sheeting
you can find over the length of the crack (the sticky tar is like
glue for this), then you tar over the plastic too.
The result works great!
My biggest problem was moving the steps away from the house and
putting them back without breaking them. Thanks to a real good
backhoe operator the whole job was successful.
I sold that house in April and bought a brand new one and guess
what.... this time the crack in the middle of the back of the house
and there are no steps in front of it. The builder guarentees the
house for 10 years and is going to fix the problem in the spring.
He's going to supply the backhoe to expose the foundation and I'll
repair the crack myself. I've got a rare builder, he's fixed
everything that's been wrong AND he lives right across the street.
If you want, I'll look at home for the name of the caulk. Call
me a 381-2767.
BC
|
148.37 | It's not a "bad" crack... | ALLUDE::CARIGNAN | Don Carignan | Tue Dec 23 1986 15:29 | 16 |
| I too have a crack in the foundation that runs all the way from the
sill to the footing. Now, this crack has only leaked a couple of
times over the 3.5 years that we've had the house -- and then never
more than a puddle's worth. It happened once when it rained for
forty days and forty nights (well, thats what it seemed like), and
other time when I had a hose trickling for a week around some
thirsty shrubs.
My question is: I haven't worried about this much. Should I?
i.e. Do these things generally get worse?
If so, is there any harm in waiting till it does
get a little worse?
- Don
(who doesn't want to see his
landscaping dug-up by a backhoe)
|
148.38 | Seal it with Silicon | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Tue Dec 23 1986 18:33 | 18 |
| I had the same type of crack in my house. From footing to sill and
it leaked once in a blue moon. I think the crack is either a settling
crack or an expansion crack ( it's in the middle of a 44 foot long
straight wall). I've seen expansion joints put in long walls of
that length or longer in other buildings.
I chiseled a "V" groove about 1" deep on the inside and filled it with
GE Silicon. I did the same on the outside from the sill to about
one foot below the dirt, that's as deep as I felt like digging and
it was only to seal it from wind-blown rain. Its hasn't leaked since
and it been over a year now!
What I created was an expansion joint. The two long walls can expand
and contract and the Silicon maintains the seal. Its important to use
a flexible caulking material.
Charly
|
148.410 | Basement - Stone | JOET::JOET | | Mon Dec 29 1986 22:05 | 13 |
| Most of the foundation is fieldstone. It leaks like a sieve and
I can't think of any way to insulate it so that it's not ambient
temperature +10 degrees in the winter.
Whoever poured the floor had no idea what they were doing. Gullies
and ridges (6" difference) all over the place. The cement is flaking
and fills my house with dust.
The furnace ducts clear my 6' head by about 1/2".
Any suggestions on how to make it more livable?
-joet
|
148.411 | :-) | FRSBEE::PAGLIARULO | | Tue Dec 30 1986 00:03 | 2 |
|
Fill it in? :-)
|
148.412 | raise the house or lower the floor! | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | | Tue Dec 30 1986 01:03 | 9 |
| You could always dig the basement floor lowwer after breaking the
old floor out. I dug my crawl space out two summers ago.
By no means is it easy work it took us 12 days,12 cases of beer
and 47 long bed truck loads to get all of the dirt out.
The dig added 800 sqft to the house for <500.00 total cost minus
my time and back! All & all it would have been easier to have moved
good luck!
-j
|
148.413 | Not a DIY job, but... | ELGAR::LEACH | | Tue Dec 30 1986 10:38 | 23 |
|
Here is a costly solution, but at least it is done right. Do the
following:
1. Have house movers lift the house off its old foundation;
2. Hire an excavator to remove the old foundation;
3. Pour a new foundation;
4. Put in perimeter drains and insulate (at least this is DIY);
5. Lower the house onto the new foundation;
6. Pour a new floor over the old.
Don't laugh, it is done more often than most realize. If you decide
to go this route, I can give you names for all the work. Just three
weeks ago, I had my house moved to a new location.
Patrick Leach
DTN 226-6260
|
148.414 | | EXODUS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue Dec 30 1986 11:22 | 7 |
| As .2 said, my father-in-law dug his cellar a foot deeper and put a
concrete facing on his all brick foundation. It took him all summer,
but after all, he's 76!
As to the leaky foundation, I dunno...
-mark
|
148.415 | I know what you are talking about | KELVIN::RPALMER | Handyman in Training | Tue Dec 30 1986 11:39 | 26 |
|
Joe,
I insulated my basement ceiling and sills about two months ago
and it has made quite a difference. Insulating the ceiling kept
the heat in the living space and lowered the temp of the basement
by about 10 degrees. When I insulated the sills it stopped lots
of heat leaks and brought the basement temp back up. I also caulked
and foamed all the little gaps between the foundation and the sills. With
the left over caulking I filled all of the leaks in the joints of
the forced hot air system. I have a rotting leaky basement window
that use to let in water and cold air. I put a window bubble on
the outside to keep out the water and stuffed a couple of batts
of insulation over the window. I'll fix it in the spring.
I am also over six feet tall and have bumps on my head from
the duct work. At the top of the stairs I have an old Red Sox batting
helmet that I put on before I go down. I get a laugh out of my
wife when I put it on, but it works better then aspirin.
I also have some water problems and I've decided to install
a sump pump in the spring. Maybe we can get everyone together and
get a volume discount :^). I went to Grossman's Bargain center in
Braintree and bought some cheap vinyl flooring for my cellar. It
looks better than flaking cement and will help keep the dust down.
If all else fails just don't go down in the cellar and forget
it exists!
good luck,
=Ralph=
|
148.416 | It may not be worth the effort | NONAME::HARDING | | Tue Dec 30 1986 12:37 | 11 |
|
Sounds like you are describing my house. What have I done - nothing -.
I get water in the spring, you should see it right now. I had
considered taking the floor up and digging it deeper but with the
water problem its not worth it. The best that I did was to go around
and stop up the air leaks in the stone foundation and insulate the
celler cealing. My celler hight is just 6 feet, in some areas that
drops to 5 feet due to a large cold air return, a low center support
beam, and a soil pipe.
dave
|
148.417 | NEVER ENTER THE CELLAR!!! | ISHTAR::MCFARLAND | | Tue Jan 13 1987 15:33 | 6 |
| Seems there are a lot of those basements around. My solution is
insulate it and never go down there.
Judie
|
148.418 | wet? | FROST::SIMON | Mister Diddy Wah Diddy? | Tue Jan 13 1987 16:32 | 31 |
|
The thing you really want to be careful about is rot caused
by moisture in the basement. It wouldn't be much fun to fall
through your first floor someday because it rotted out.
If you can identify the source of the water it would be worthwhile
figuring out how to stop it.
Here is my basement situation right now. I put in a 4' 8" crawl
space type foundation when I built my place. Just a dirt floor
with plastic over it the first two years I lived there. The first
spring I discovered a spring coming up in the south-west corner
of the basement. I had a good 6 inches of water down there. Yuk!
That summer I went down (after it dried up...'bout August) and dug
trenches and put in gravel, drain pipe and covered it back up.
This took care of the actual water problem, but just a sheet of
4 mil plactic with a couple inches of sand over it didn't help the
humidity problem much. Still real humid, so this past summer I
put another 6 mil of plastic over the dirt and had a concrete
floor poured. This seems to have helped.
I'm still not too sure what I plan to do with the basement, but it
at least is a more friendly place to go now that it's not just a
sandy wet pit. I'll probably make it into a root /wine cellar
and maybe get into a little home brewing and store beer down there.
-gary
|
148.419 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | | Wed Jan 14 1987 01:32 | 5 |
| My father had a problem with moisture in his crawl space and used
a vent fan to help the air circulation it seemed to fix the problem.
At least it got rid of the salamanders:-)
-j
|
148.420 | put it to good use! | BEING::MCCULLEY | RSX Pro | Fri Jan 16 1987 22:04 | 2 |
| re .8 - if you try the homebrewing, you might want to check out
PICA::HOMEBREW.NOTE
|
148.421 | | FROST::SIMON | Mister Diddy Wah Diddy? | Tue Jan 20 1987 19:53 | 7 |
|
re: < Note 671.10 by BEING::MCCULLEY "RSX Pro" >
Thanks for the tip.....I'll have to check it out. (If I ever get caught
up on all my other notesfiles....)
|
148.342 | How Do I Find Ledge? | BCSE::SCOPA | The Major | Thu Mar 19 1987 15:59 | 9 |
| I'm thinking about putting on an addition but I'm not sure if that
part of my land has ledge. Does anybody have any strong feelings
as to who I should rely on to check this out for me? Do I call a
Contractor, Landscaper, etc?
If anyone has any reputable names of people in the Nashua area please
let me know.
Mike
|
148.343 | Do some detective work... | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Thu Mar 19 1987 17:17 | 17 |
| Talk to others that have built in your area recently or drilled
a well.
Check with the town engineering dept. they may have maps that indicate
what the predominate sub-soil and beyond in composed of.
Check with the highway dept. they may know or have recorded what
was there when water and/or sewer lines were put in.
Look around your house and neigborhood... do you see outcroppings
of ledge?
Hire a someone with a backhoe to come and dig test holes where you
plan to build. It may only cost 100 dollars and be the only definitive
answer short of actually digging the hole itself.
Charly
|
148.344 | steel rod | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Thu Mar 19 1987 18:15 | 11 |
|
Will your new addition need a full basement? If the foundation is only
going to be a frost wall (that is, if it only needs to go down four feet
or so) then you can buy a 5-foot length of 1/4-inch steel rod and go
prospecting for ledge. Just pound the rod into the ground along the
planned foundation.
This method also works on "lost" septic tanks or drywells.
JP
|
148.345 | | BOEHM::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Mar 19 1987 19:47 | 12 |
| re:-1
Sounds reasonable, but naturally when you hit something it might be just a big
rock and you'll have to probe around to be sure.
If you're REAL serious about this project, I'd opt for the backhoe. Although
it will make a hell of a mess, if you're planning on digging anyway...
Also, if you don't want a basement and do hit ledge, isn't it possible to
just sit your slab/walls directly on it?
-mark
|
148.346 | | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Tue Mar 24 1987 11:35 | 10 |
|
Re: .3
It is possible to put the walls directly on ledge (not sure about a
slab, tho). You have to scribe the forms to fit the rock. To anchor
the wall, you drill some holes about 6" into the rock and pound in
some 5/8 reinforcing bar.
JP
|
148.39 | Will block foundation support extra expansion weight? | RUNWAY::MILLER | | Mon May 18 1987 19:37 | 16 |
| Help ! I need some advice...
I recently bought a small (very small) 2 bedroom house,
with a full basement & under-house one car garage. The house
is set on a cement block foundation.
I am wondering what the potential for upward expansion may or
may not be, as the house is set very close to the lot lines and
I don't think we can go out much at all. I have heard that with
a block foundation that you are really limited structurally as
far as upward expansion.
Anyone have ideas ?
|
148.40 | local codes ? may be mote | AMULET::FARRINGTON | statistically anomalous | Tue May 19 1987 16:00 | 2 |
| What does your local building inspector/board have to say ? Will
they allow that, with or without a variation to code ?
|
148.41 | Should be ok | HAZEL::THOMAS | No <ESC> from reality | Tue May 19 1987 17:10 | 6 |
| Multi-story houses are routinely built on on 12" cement block
foundations. If you have 12" block and it's in good shape, then
you should have no problem with a second story addition. Of course
your local building inspector has the last word.
|
148.42 | | AMULET::TAYLOR | | Wed May 20 1987 16:22 | 7 |
| I know where you can get a good deal on a slightly used construction
trailer located in Carlisle......
FIFE.
|
148.43 | Concrete Foundations | PAXVAX::NAYLOR | Mark E. Naylor | Fri May 29 1987 02:14 | 15 |
| A while back, there was a note on using forms for a concrete
foundation, which I cannot find. I believe it asked about
purchasing the forms so that this could be a DIY project. Well,
if there is some interest, I can relate my experiences of last
week. I spent 3 days using these forms to install a foundation
for a garage I am building. I contracted a company to do the
work. They were very reasonable (and good) and since I was home
on vacation, they showed me how to install the forms (everything
from start to finish).
Should I start typing ?
Mark
|
148.44 | Yes, Yes! | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Fri May 29 1987 12:29 | 9 |
| I'm going to be needing to put in a foundation for my garage in the next couple
of weeks, so I'd be VERY interested. Specifically, did you rent the forms? If
so, where? Did you buy or build them? If so, would you consider becoming a
rental agent yourself? :^)
Also, as an aside, has anyone ever used one of the Bobcat-sized backhoes? I'm
considering renting one to dig the hole for the foundation.
Paul
|
148.45 | write it all | CADWRK::BUTLER | | Fri May 29 1987 15:44 | 4 |
| please do and do not forget anything
al
|
148.46 | Small jobs are OK for Bobcat; no clay or boulders | ISBG::POWELL | Reed Powell - LCG Marketing - 297-4261 | Fri May 29 1987 18:11 | 10 |
| One of the guys I work with has a brother who tried out a Bobcat
last weekend for some septic digging. If you are digging dirt with
no boulders in there for fill, then the Bobcat is OK. If there
is clay, or big boulders, then the Bobcat sucks eggs: Inability
to dig into the clay, both in terms of digging ability and sheer
weight behind it. For the large boulders (and we had some real
winners when we dug for our addition's foundation last year), it
just doesn't have the lifting/pulling capability.
-reed
|
148.47 | Bobcats | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Fri May 29 1987 18:25 | 17 |
| > For the large boulders (and we had some real
> winners when we dug for our addition's foundation last year), it
> just doesn't have the lifting/pulling capability.
What size boulder's? I rented a bobcat to backfill my foundation.
I lifted boulder's about 3-4 feet in diameter. Bigger ones (5'
diameter), can be rolled, but not lifted.
With boulder's 3-4 feet in diameter, you just have to be careful
not to lift them any higher than you half to, or the back wheels
will lift up.
But I agree that unless you live on a beach, you can't excavate
a foundation with a bobcat, with or without the backhoe attachment.
|
148.48 | | HELIX::NAYLOR | | Mon Jun 01 1987 01:51 | 25 |
| re: .1
I did not rent the forms, I dealt with a concrete forms company. I did
consider making the forms myself but decided not to based mostly on the
the amount of time involved. I figured a company could install them alot
faster than I could make and install them.
I also considered buying the forms, because as I mentioned in .0, there
was some interest by others. I am sure that if I did buy them, I could
sell them to someone else (I really do not want to be in the rental
business). However, I soon forgot about this because I would need a
LARGE truck to haul the forms. They are 1 1/4" thick - the 2' x 5' panels
weigh 50 pounds. My garage has 136 linear feet of foundation, so I would
need 272 feet of forms (about 13,600 pounds !) The truck that came to
my house had enough forms to do over 400 feet of walls and the truck's
weight was 33,000 pounds !
I also hired a guy with a backhoe to did the hole for the walls. After
watching him, I have to agree with .3, I do not think the backhoe attachment
would be sufficient. You need a hole about 4' deep and 3' wide, which
I think would take a long time with a bobcat.
Mark
|
148.49 | | HELIX::NAYLOR | | Mon Jun 01 1987 02:58 | 63 |
| First of all, panels come 5' and 8' high. The common width is 24", but
you can get 20", 16", 12", 11", 10", 9", 8", 7", and 6" wide panels. You
also need inside and outside corners, staging brackets and the metals
"ties" that hold the inside and outside walls together.
After the foundation hole was dug and the footings were poured, we marked
the corners of the garage. Once we double checked that these points were
square, we drove masonry nails into the footings at each corner. We then
snapped chalk lines (the outside edge of the walls). Starting at a corner,
we set up a panel (outside wall) so that the inside edge was on the chalk
line. Then set up the companion panel across from the first one and connected
them with 3 ties (5' panels have 3 ties and 8' panels have 5). The ties
fit into notches in the panels. Now put a panel next to the first outside
panel and using a hammer tap the "dog" into place. The dog is attached to
the left edge of each panel via a rivet so it can spin. You spin the dog
so that the two grooves lock into the tie and a pin on the right edge of
the adjacent panel. Now setup the companion inside panel. After each
panel is locked in place, check it for being plumb. Now do this for the
rest of the wall. When you get close to the corner, you have figure which
combination of panels will match your dimensions. Also, corners use two
special items, an inside corner and an outside corner. These also have
pins and dogs so you can tie the walls together even at corners.
Once all the walls are up, you install staging brackets to the inside of the
inside wall (again there are pins in place for this). 2x10's fit on these
at the right height so you have a nice platform to work from. Now depending
on the height of the walls you need, you may not be filling the forms all the
way to the top. If not, you need to use a transit to find the proper height.
If your footings were perfectly level, you would not have to do this. I was
pouring 4'4" walls, so we marked one spot and worked our way around driving
a nail thru the inside panel so that is protruded into the space between
the panels. We inserted a nail every 3 or 4 feet. (Then later, when pouring
the concrete, we poured up to the nails.) Next, we oiled the forms to permit
easy removal. I am not sure what kind of oil it was, but it was real sweet
smelling. We used a small pump and a sprayer with a long wand.
Now for the 'crete ! As the concrete went into the forms, using special
7" wide shovels, we made sure there were no pockets in the concrete. You
just push the shovel down into the concrete and pull it up to make sure the
concrete is filling the wall. After all the concrete was in, we floated the
top with a small float. Now to make sure the walls are plumb wrt inside and
outside. (We know the walls are plumb in the direction parallel to them
since we checked each panel as we set it up). Every 4 or 6 feet, check the
walls for plumb and add a 2x4 brace on an angle to either push in on the
top of the outside form or push out on the top of the inside form. We used
the same technique used when framing the walls. We ran a string all around
the perimeter of the forms. At each corner was a 3/4" thick block. We then
checked for a consistent 3/4" space between the string and the panels.
By now, the concrete was firm enough to insert the anchor bolts. I used
bolts but you can also use anchor straps.
Since most walls are 8 or 12 inches wide, the 7" shovels work great. You
can even use them to drag the concrete along inside the wall.
I almost forgot, if you are pouring walls for a garage, you need to put
a drop in the wall for the garage door. To do this, we put short pieces
of 2x8 inside the front wall to act like a dam.
I think that is everything; good luck,
Mark
|
148.50 | | WELFAR::PGRANSEWICZ | | Mon Jun 01 1987 15:55 | 7 |
| RE: .6
Pouring foundations definitely sounds like a job that is better
left to the pros. Sounds like there is a lot of equipment and
expertise needed. Besides, who wants to get their new addition
of to a crooked start?
|
148.51 | Get a pro. | DELNI::OSTROM | Andy Ostrom Networks Mktg. 272-7132 | Mon Jun 01 1987 19:10 | 7 |
| And if you want it STRONG you need to bend/add lengths of #4 rebar! I have a
friend who decided that he could save money by building his own forms (for a
garage), and then re-use the plywood as sheathing. WRONG! First, one of them
started leaking concrete, and after the concrete was set and the forms pulled,
the plywood was such a mess that it was a write off. Get a pro to do it...
|
148.52 | | PAXVAX::NAYLOR | Mark E. Naylor | Tue Jun 02 1987 01:52 | 27 |
|
re: .7
Yes, it is ALOT of work, but if you had access to the equipment,
I think it could be a DIY job. I am glad I paid someone else to
do the work (mostly because if there would have been a problem,
they would be responsible). However, I feel fortunate to have
worked with them to get the experience.
re: .8
You really do not need the rebar, especially for a foundation wall
that is back-filled on both sides. And most likely the plywood
stuck to the walls was because the forms were not oiled.
In case anyone wants to know who I hired, the company is A-1 Forms
and Tom Inman is the owner. They are in Marlboro and like I said,
they do very good work. Their prices are also lower than the $16
or $18 per foot that has been quoted elsewhere in this file. Feel
free to mention I recommended A-1, if you use them. As usual, the
standard disclaimer applys - I am in no way affiliated with A-1 Forms.
Phone number is 485-7886.
Mark
|
148.53 | | STAR::SWIST | Jim Swist ZKO1-1/D42 381-1264 | Tue Jun 02 1987 13:02 | 4 |
| Re .9
I used A-1 on a big job and do not share the opinion of .9. Send
mail for details.
|
148.54 | Tell us your story here | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Tue Jun 02 1987 13:37 | 9 |
| Jim, Why don't you post your opinions here? One of the nice features
of this notes file is to exchange information, both good and bad
about various contractors. I for one would be very interested to
hear what you have to say.
Charly
P.S. This reminds me, I must go post a update on a contractor that
I found thru this file.
|
148.55 | | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Thu Jun 04 1987 14:25 | 58 |
|
Setting forms and pouring concrete is pretty labor-intensive but it can
be done by a DIYer. You'll need at least one expert on the job, though.
If you do it yourself, the additional work/expense of using rebar is less
than trivial. Commercial contractors use rebar in everything they pour.
You should, too, and especially for retaining walls and any type of footing.
When pouring a footing, you should also "key" it to anchor the concrete wall
to be poured on top. The following is a cross-section of the footing
forms.
/---2X4
________/________
| |___| |
| |
| |
| |
+---------------+
The 2X4s are just tacked in place onto the strapping that holds the walls
of the form together and runs the entire length of the footing forms.
After the concrete sets up a bit, you take out the 2X4 and you have a
nice key that locks the wall in place. In fact, you could just scoop
out a key with your hands while the concrete is still soft but this looks
a bit more professional.
Commercial contractors have a lot more clout than a homeowner with the
concrete vendors. If the concrete is too watery, a contractor will tell
the truck driver to take it away. A homeowner can say that too, but the
chances are the guy won't come back... The concrete vendor wants the
concrete as watery as possible because stiff concrete means a lot more wear
and tear on the truck.
The stiffness or "slump" of concrete is measured by pouring some into a
standard cone and overturning the cone on a flat surface. The slump number
is the distance that the concrete sags or slumps. If the tip of the cone
slumps two inches, it's "slump 2," and so forth, so the lower the number
the stiffer the concrete. Commercial contractors usually demand slump 4
or stiffer. Homeowners often demand slump 4 and get slump 6 or worse...
When pouring a wall, the right way to get a nice, smooth-looking surface
is to: 1) oil the forms before the pour and 2) use a vibrator to get
all the bubbles out of the concrete. Vibrators can be rented from Taylor
and come in several sizes. (The first time I saw one of these jaspers, I
just blinked for about thirty seconds because it resembles nothing
so much as a 1/2 horsepower dildo.) You just drop the business end into
the concrete every few feet and watch the bubbles and water come to the
top. Note that vibrating can be overdone -- too much can cause all the stone
to settle to the bottom of the pour.
The only other warning I can think of is for cold-weather pouring. Some
builders use calcium chloride to keep the concrete from freezing and to make
it set up faster. This is a bad idea because CaCl weakens the concrete.
If you must pour in cold weather, you've got to get a big enough space
heater to keep the concrete warm.
JP
|
148.94 | treating a wood foundation w/preserver | ZEN::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Wed Jul 08 1987 02:35 | 22 |
| I looked in 1111.94 (wood) and couldn't find. If the answer to this
exists, please repoint me by mail and I will delete.
======================================================================
Our house has an attached deck, about 1/2 story above the ground. Its
'foundation' is made of wood. (its actually rather clever, as it is
finished to appears as if it is a concrete foundation - but it is
really built from wood joists, with some sort of sheetrock surrounding
the foundation - has a little hatch you can go through to get to the
underside).
I'm told I should cover all exposed wood surfaces under the deck with
wood preserver to lengthen the life of the deck. Sounds good.
1) Will any wood preserver do? (what do I look for, should I use
Cupernol (sp?)).
2) Is it as easy as taking a 3" brush and going to it?
thanx
/j
|
148.28 | Rotary Impact !!! | NETCOM::HARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Mon Jul 13 1987 18:43 | 11 |
| Well, I finally did it. I cut through the foundation this past weekend.
I started using a K-12 rescue saw with Diamond blade which seems
to have worked fine at first but: Kicks up a lot of hazardous dust,
hard to keep the HEAVY saw straight when sawing a vertical surface
like a wall and it's expensive( 50.00 a day, $5/per .001 of the
blade with a minimum of .005).
I finished it up with a rotary impact hammer and a 1-inch carbide
bit... Worked great! I would recommend to ALL that they explore
this method first!
Mark
|
148.104 | Crushed stone drainage around foundation? | TALLIS::MEGA | | Tue Aug 18 1987 15:53 | 19 |
|
I would like to put an 18" to 24" strip of crushed stone around the foundation
of my house to keep the rain from digging divots in the lawn as it falls off
the roof. Two of my neighbors had conflicting views on the method of
installation.
1) Dig down 2 inches or so, sloping away from the foundation, lay down a sheet
of plastic, then cover with the crushed stone. Reason? The rain will drip
into the stone, down to the plastic, and then run off away from the foundation.
2) Dig down 8 inches and fill completely with stone, using no plastic. Reason?
As the rain is filtering through the 8" of stone, it will also seep its way
into the rest of the lawn and away from the foundation.
Anyone have any thoughts on which method is better, or if there's a different
method altogether?
Thanks,
- Chris
|
148.105 | from Rain City | WYNTON::SYSTEM | Brian McWilliams | Tue Aug 18 1987 17:48 | 13 |
| RE. .0
Doesn't your house have gutters?
If not, then no amount of gravel or plastic will really keep water
from infiltrating your foundation if it's coming straight off the
roof.
If you do have gutters, then the problem is with them, not the ground
covering. They shouldn't allow rain to "fall off" the roof, as
you say. See the notes on gutters in this conference.
-Brian
|
148.106 | Split the difference | MAGIC::COTE | | Tue Aug 18 1987 18:14 | 15 |
| I did some similar work at my house, but I sort of split the difference
between the two methods you described. I removed the loam and "grass"
from the area, and refilled with crush to within an inch of the
original grade. Then I put down a mowing strip of brick to seperate
the lawn from the stones I put on top of the crush. The effect
is a very need border and no muddy splash marks on the house.
You're right to want to slope EVERYTHING away from the foundation.
I do get some weed growth, but it's a quick job every month to pull
up whatever is growing.
BC
|
148.107 | Crush isn't something you drink | MAGIC::COTE | | Tue Aug 18 1987 18:29 | 8 |
| Crush may be a local term. It is crushed stone and sand. I put
blue pea-stone on top of the crush level with the existing grade
and level with the mowing strip. The mowing strip gives you a place
to put the wheels of the mower and also prevents the pea-stone from
being launched all over the lawn.
BC
|
148.108 | | 3D::BOOTH | Stephen Booth | Wed Aug 19 1987 11:08 | 8 |
|
Re .-1
Whats a mowing strip ? It sounds interesting as I shy away from
using rocks of any kind due to the lawn mowing near the edge.
-Steve-
|
148.109 | More than you really wanted to know about stones | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Wed Aug 19 1987 13:42 | 16 |
| "Crushed Stone" is similar to pea-stone but is made mechanically rather
than naturally. Pea-stone has soft rounded sides and crushed-stone has
sharper and flater sides since it is made by crushing larger stones.
Both are run thru a screening process to seperate them by size and are
sold that way, ie. 1/4" 1/2" 3/4" ... etc.
Crushed stone is usually plain and only comes in the color of your
local rocks. It is usually used for utility purposes, ie. drainage,
leach fields etc.
Pea-Stone can be more decorative as you get into the various colors,
browns, reds, blues, grays and is usually used on driveways, garden
areas and other locations where they can be seen. Around here (Central
Mass.) the pea usually costs more than the crushed stone.
Charly
|
148.110 | An Attempt to Explain Mowing Strips | MAGIC::COTE | | Wed Aug 19 1987 15:05 | 18 |
| A mowing strip is simply a border between things like stones or
bark mulch, or a walls that gives you some distance between the
grass to be cut and that other thing. (I'm doing a lot of hand
waving that be included in a note.)
The idea is that the strip is wide enough (like the width of a brick)
to put the mower wheels on and low enough in relation to the grade
that it gives you a nice clean edge.
There's a real good book on home landscaping put out my the "Reader's
Digest" that talks about all sorts of techniques to minimize the
time required for mowing and landscape maintenance. Another technique
is to use rounded corners on planting beds and the such so that
you can mow in one continuous motion.
BC
|
148.111 | | 3D::BOOTH | Stephen Booth | Wed Aug 19 1987 15:24 | 10 |
|
Re .-1
Great but whats a mowing strip ?
Is it made out of plastic, concrete ....??
-Steve-
|
148.112 | Read What You Read | 39437::BURKHART | | Wed Aug 19 1987 16:02 | 10 |
| RE .7
Re-read .6 and pay attention to the word BRICK.
Although .6 uses brick it can be any flat surface that keeps
you from running your mower over your rock or bark mulch etc.
The most common things to use are bricks and landscape timbers.
...Dave
|
148.113 | Flagstones | VIDEO::DCL | David Larrick | Wed Aug 19 1987 16:52 | 5 |
| I use flagstones for a moving strip between my lawn and (non-raised) veggie
garden.
They're a good deal wider than what's described in .6, so the visual effect
is different. But I don't have to aim my mower wheels as carefully.
|
148.114 | | 3D::BOOTH | Stephen Booth | Wed Aug 19 1987 17:05 | 5 |
|
Re .8
You did not say brick was used, you used brick as an example of
width !!!!!
|
148.115 | mowing strips | AKOV68::GLEASON | | Thu Aug 20 1987 14:04 | 14 |
| I use 3.5" X 5.5" X 8 ft. pressure treated garden timbers set at
ground level as mowing strips around my entire lawn. I angled all
inside corners at 45 degrees or less. Outside corners are at any
angle as it only takes a sec. to redirect your lawn mower. I used
1 ft. lengths of 1/2 inch rod to stake down the timbers. I have
absolutely no trimming to do, with this setup. It takes me 20 minutes
to cut a 2500 sq. ft lawn, including emptying the catcher 3 times,
and that is with an 18 inch wide lawnmower at a normal pace.
Mowing strips should be at least 3 inches wide and can be made out
of timbers, bricks, cobblestones, etc.. I don't recommend using
bark mulch are small crushed stone, as they can kick up and scatter
into the lawn. (that should read "bark mulch or small crushed stone")
|
148.116 | sources for Pea Stone? | Q::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum;mail->Boehm::Rosenbaum | Mon Aug 24 1987 02:12 | 2 |
| Any recommendations for sources of pea stone in Central Mass?
Prices?
|
148.117 | Stow Sand and Gravel | MAY11::WARCHOL | | Wed Aug 26 1987 17:47 | 5 |
| Stow Sand and Gravel on Boroughs Rd in Boxborough. I can't remember
the price last time I bought some but it was priced by the ton.
Give them a call.
Nick
|
148.120 | Leaky foundation pins | TALLIS::MEGA | | Mon Sep 14 1987 17:11 | 37 |
|
I'm not sure of the correct term for these, but they are the steel rods used
to space the plywood forms when a foundation is poured. I'll call them pins.
When my house was built, none of the pin holes were covered with cement. Both
ends of each pin were knocked off so the pin is still inside the wall. With
the rain we had this weekend, water has managed to seep into my cellar via
these pin holes. The water gets in both the top and the bottom set of holes.
I have plugged up the inside of the top set of holes with hydraulic cement,
but its expanding properties aren't doing much good because the cement is not
'inside' the hole, it's just stuck to the surface of the inside wall. Water
still gets in because the holes on the outside of the foundation are not
plugged. I can dig up the 10" or so of soil around the foundation and seal up
the top level of holes, but the bottom level of pins are still unprotected,
and buried about 6' down.
OUTSIDE INSIDE
+-----+ --
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\| | about 14" below top of foundation
| |
PINS <=====> --
| |
S | |
O | |
I | |
L | |
| |
<=====> --
| | about 6" above bottom of foundation
+-----+ --
Does anyone have any suggestions on how I can properly stop the water from
leaking into my cellar? The hydraulic cement as a surface sealer doesn't
seem to do the trick.
Thanks,
- Chris
|
148.121 | Leaking foundation | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Mon Sep 14 1987 17:35 | 18 |
| You probably already know this if you read the instructions on the
hydraulic cement:
When you use hydraulic cement you're supposed to chisel out an
inverted "V" at the area you're patching. That is, the point of
the "V" is at the surface of the wall, and the hole gets bigger
inside the wall. Then you fill this hole with the cement.
This is very difficult to do, if not impossible. But it's also
difficult to dig down to the bottom row of rods on the outside
of your foundation.
Either way, you're supposed to chisel out this V-shaped hole.
How many of them leak? I'd probably keep cementing over
them on the inside. Some of mine used to leak but eventually
they seemed to plug themselves up, with tiny pebbles or something.
|
148.122 | | TALLIS::MEGA | | Mon Sep 14 1987 18:30 | 17 |
|
I can't honestly say whether the package of hydraulic cement mentioned the
"V" shaped notch. I'll check again.
About 1/2 of the pins on a 24' foundation wall leak. I've already applied
2 'coats' of cement to the leaky pins on the top row. Whenever it rains,
the cement slowly gets darker and darker, indicating the water is coming in.
Then eventually the water finds its way between the hydraulic cement and the
original foundation wall and starts dripping down. It's at this point that I
get the recurring nightmares about the builder...If only I had it to do over
again. (*^%*^@&#$!!)
Just as an aside, I would have thought that a simple thing like plugging up
the foundation pin holes would be "required" by building code. It seems strange
that the builder would have left such a glaring invitation for a flooded
cellar.
|
148.123 | leaking pinbs | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Mon Sep 14 1987 18:36 | 7 |
| > Just as an aside, I would have thought that a simple thing like plugging up
>the foundation pin holes would be "required" by building code.
It is required, in Townsend, MA. I don't know whether that's a
state code or just my building inspectors own requirement.
|
148.124 | | DECSIM::DEMBA | | Mon Sep 14 1987 20:19 | 30 |
| If this house is 'new' the builder should be the one responsible.
Anyway, the outside of the foundation should have had a coating
of sealent over it this should have helped prevent this from occuring
in the first place. Additional help is provided when polyethylene
is also used to cover the foundation.
When I built our house I covered each of these form ties on the
exterior side of the foundation first with cement, then with heavy
roofing tar, then covered the whole foundation with the regular tar
waterproofing, then with polyethylene, and finally with rigid foam
insulation. One reason for the overkill is that knew as soon as
the ties rusted enough we would have the same little fountains in
our basement.
One way to seal them off with the the hydraulic cement, is first drive
the form ties into the wall about two inches. Use a good sized punch
or similar tool. Then with a one inch masonry bit in an 1/2 inch
electric drill widen the holes to be about an inch in diameter and
a maybe an inch or two deep. Now mix up the cement and force it
into the holes.
Make sure you get most of the dust out of the holes first to insure
good bonding.
A star drill is hand hammer driven and will work very well if you
don't have an electric drill large enough to fit the bit. I drilled
two two inch deep holes using one in granite and it actually worked
better than a carbide tipped drill bit.
|
148.125 | Fix the outside. | STEREO::BEAUDET | | Tue Sep 15 1987 16:06 | 18 |
| Another drainage problem. The builder also should have installed
drains around the footings. That would relieve the pressure on the
ouside of the foundation. The ouside SHOULD HAVE been sealed by
the builder. That does not mean is was done.
My basement leaked until I excavated the entire thing to put drains
around the footings. Guess what? The builder sealed the outside
of the foundation ... right down to the footing and stopped about
2 inches above the footings! That's where it's needed most!
Needless to say I re-sealed it, put the drains in and have no problems
to speak of (A week of heavy rain can cause me some seeping but
I plan to install a sump pump just for those cases.
I think you need to do some digging and get it fixed at the source.
/tb/
|
148.126 | We got drains... | TALLIS::MEGA | | Tue Sep 15 1987 17:16 | 20 |
| > Another drainage problem. The builder also should have installed
> drains around the footings. That would relieve the pressure on the
> ouside of the foundation.
Supposedly there is a perforated drainage pipe running around the
perimeter of the house, connected with a "Y" connector under the
driveway, which then empties out into a culvert beside the driveway.
I was told that the drainage pipes would only be effective
during the spring thaws. (The house is only 5 months old, so it
has yet to experience a real spring thaw.)
We began to wonder about the drainage during the early summer, after
3 or 4 days of heavy rain, when NO water was draining out of the pipe
into the culvert. We thought the pipe may be clogged or something.
Our neighbor told us that the drain pipes would not help during
rainstorms, as they were meant to help during the slow process of
spring thaw. Seems a might silly if you ask me.
- Chris
|
148.127 | repairing leaky basements and tie rods | STRATA::LAMY | | Wed Sep 16 1987 09:31 | 31 |
| The pins are refered to as tie rods. I worked in the basement
waterproofing business for 3 years prior to joining DEC and have
dealt with the problem of leaky tie rod pins on many occassion.This
solution I am going to explain is the way I was taught and I can
proudly say I never had to go back to do any additional repairs.
I worked for B-dry systems;the leader in basement waterproofing.we
would install drainage tile pitched down to a well and sump pump
inside the footing along the foundation wall inside the basement.
As the water table would rise the water would go into our system.
I won't go into specifics but the system does work:all our work
is guarenteed for the life of the house. When we came upon a house
that the tie rods leaked we would cover the walls with a hard plastic
sheeting(similar to what is used in bathroom showers) and let the
bottom of this plastic extend below the floor into the system. when
the floor gets recemented the water that leaks in from these tie
rods would drip down behind the plastic,below the floor and into
the drainage system. This was done only in cases where the water
was entering the basement from other areas as well as the tie rods.
If you don't have a water problem other then the tie rods then I
would suggest the following. rent a small hand held power hammer
with a chisel bit from your local rental service(I know taylor rental
has them). Chisel out the cement around the tie rod 2-3" on either
side and about 1-2" deep. if tie rod sticks out past the surface
of wall then these should be cut back with bolt cutters. wash the
holes out with water and let dry.Then using hydrolic cement pack
the holes up and smooth the cement out. this will work!!! good luck.
If you have any questions about this send me mail and I will go
into more detail with you. also if any one has a basement water
problem and would like some assistance in determining the solution
then send me mail and I will be of whatever help I can. Just think
of all the nice things you can do with a dry basement.
|
148.128 | Use Silicon | RIKKI::CBUSKY | | Tue Sep 22 1987 14:50 | 10 |
| I have used GE Silicon to seal up the leaky tie rod pins from the
inside with execellent results. I second the idea about cleaning up the
hole, removing the dust, washing it out and then let it dry.
I like the silcon better than the hard drying patching cement because
it stays flexible. The new concrete patching silcon is even better than
the regular clear silcon. It appears to be more "liquid" so that it can
soak into the cement pores and form a good bond.
Charly
|
148.144 | Repairing Fieldstone Foundation | DELNI::MCCONNELL | Never Play Leapfrog w/ a Unicorn | Tue Sep 22 1987 19:40 | 8 |
| We recently bought a house with a fieldstone foundation that we
would like to repoint before winter. I would like your suggestions
on what to use - a concrete mix, sand mix, etc. Also, any
other tips on doing this would be welcomed.
Thanks,
Sue
|
148.129 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | the Gort | Tue Sep 22 1987 23:53 | 7 |
| re.8 I second the silicon. I used it to patch a crack in my foundation
that was caused by settling which used to leak on every rain storm.
Since caulking it i havent had any problems. The big advantage is
you dont have to hammer and chisle.
-j
|
148.130 | Finally! Progress!! | GUMMO::SULLIVAN | The foundation is in!!!! | Wed Sep 23 1987 16:53 | 14 |
|
Well, as my personal note says, after almost two years of preparation
the foundation is in. We have something concrete to look at :-)
:-) (Sorry, couldn't resist)
I've started to knock the pins off and fill with hydrolic cement.
Thanks for the advice in an earlier note. The stuff sets up incredibly
fast! I took the advice offered earlier and bought some of those rubber
surgical gloves. I mix up a handful and apply using my fingers to
push the cement into the pin holes. Works a lot better and faster
than trying to use the trowel.
Mark
|
148.145 | mortar mix? | Q::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum;mail->Boehm::Rosenbaum | Wed Sep 30 1987 00:28 | 10 |
| Speaking from limited experience, I would think that mortar
mix (which is different from concrete mix and sand mix)
would be appropriate. (morter mix has hydrated lime, or you can
get cement and add your own lime and sand).
Rich
disclaimer:
Then again, for just repointing, maybe sand mix is better. Like
I said, limited experience..
|
148.131 | But can Si *really* patch a hole? | TALLIS::MEGA | | Wed Oct 21 1987 11:28 | 18 |
| Re .8
> I like the silcon better than the hard drying patching cement because
> it stays flexible. The new concrete patching silcon is even better than
> the regular clear silcon. It appears to be more "liquid" so that it can
> soak into the cement pores and form a good bond.
I never even thought about silicon, and I never knew about the new concrete
patching silicon. But I guess my main question is, can it be used as a surface
sealer or does it require a hole that it can expand into, like hydraulic cement
does? .9 mentions that no hammer and chisel are required, but I'm skeptical
about silicon's ability to seal the hole if it's applied only on the surface.
- Chris
(I just read this after I bought a 10 lb. tub of hydraulic cement -- haven't
opened it yet though. Silicon sounds a little easier to deal with, if it's
got similar bonding/sealing/filling properties.)
|
148.132 | Silicone will work...in a pinch... | ALIEN::PETROVIC | If you don't do it, no one will | Wed Oct 21 1987 12:15 | 12 |
| re: .-1
I've used silicone to try to seal some basement cracks that were leaking
this past spring. Water was seeping up thru creaks where the city sewer
was put in by the previous owner at an alarming rate, so in a panic, I
used GE Silicone Seal II, forcing it into the leaking cracks with the
pressure of the gun. It certainly slowed the leak down, but came no
where close to stopping it. I was then able to get to a hardware store
for hydraulic cement which finally plugged the leaks.
I now have to go over all the 'Rube Goldberg-patched' cracks and fix
them correctly...
|
148.134 | | HOBBIT::RIDGE | | Thu Oct 22 1987 15:31 | 9 |
| If you are buying Hydrolic cement in 10lb cans from a store like
grossmans you are buying it the expensive way. You should check
out a Masonry supply place. You buy it in 25lb tubs at a price
that is less than two 10lb cans at grossmans. However, if
your sure that one can will be enough.. then ok.
That was what I found several years ago when I tackled a leaky
basement.
|
148.146 | mortar mix for repointing | TFH::DONNELLY | Take my advice- Don't listen to me | Wed Nov 18 1987 02:05 | 20 |
|
Sue,
It's probably too late but in the interest of creating reference
material...
Morter mix is what you want. It has the added stickiness to stick onto
vertical surfaces, which you need with irregular fieldstone. Just mix it
according to the directions, then add either more mix or water to get the
desired consistency (very slight adjustments will do it). I use a spring
scale to measure as little as 5 lb at a time. Describing the consistency
is tough but if it's right it works and if it ain't... If you gouge it
with the trowel and it fills right back in, it's too thin; but if you tap
the bucket and it don't, it's too thick. Finally, if you're like me and
waited too long, you can work above 40 degrees. And if you're really
determined you can use warm water and work between 32 and 40.
You know anyone with a small cement mixer they'd like to part with?
Craig (with the fs foundation and scraped knuckles)
|
148.95 | addition w/o concrete foundation | TOPDOC::PHILBROOK | Chico's Daddy | Mon Jan 11 1988 19:49 | 12 |
| My wife and I are making an offer on a house and wondered if anyone
could put our minds at ease about a foundation issue.
There's an addition on the back of the house - a 4-season porch/
mudroom with cathedral ceiling. The addition is not built on a cement
foundation. I don't quite know yet exactly how it's built. The rest
of the house is in AAA condition and seems very structurally sound.
What are the ramifications (if any) to an addition such as this?
Thanks
Mike
|
148.96 | It worked for me | MARX::TASCHEREAU | Whatever it takes. | Tue Jan 12 1988 11:38 | 8 |
| I had a similar situation with my house. The sun porch was
built on 2x4 struts. Not only had it settled over the years but
termites had started to invade the struts. What I did was to contract
a mason to come in and put a relatively inexpensive cinder block
foundation under the porch and remove the struts. You might
want to consider a similar course of action.
Steve Taschereau
|
148.97 | | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Tue Jan 12 1988 17:25 | 8 |
| the house we bought has a '4-season' porch - built on a wood
foundation, but designed with minimal ground/earth contact (only at
the outside corners, and 2 spots in the middle. At the home
inspectors suggestion, I went under one day and 'painted' the whole
foundation (but not the underside of the porch) with cupinol. If you
consider your clothes expendable, it really wan't very painful, and
now I have some security that the porch is more protected from the
elements, especially at the ground/wood junctions.
|
148.98 | | TOPDOC::PHILBROOK | Chico's Daddy | Tue Jan 12 1988 18:43 | 8 |
| I've found out that the structure is supported by 4x4 pressure-treated
posts. I imagine if it is to truly last a long time that it might
have to be reinforced with lolley columns at some point, but since
this structure is only about 8 years old, what's its life expectancy
before it needs major rework?
Thanks
Mike
|
148.99 | how is it rated? | VLNVAX::HEDERSTEDT | T.B.S. | Thu Jan 21 1988 13:35 | 9 |
|
Life of the wood depends on the type of protection it has.I am
building a house on a totaly wood foundation.The wood is not somthing
you ca buy at a lumber yard.The product is under test by the US
Forestry dept.It has been a bit over 40 years and the wood is as
new as the day it went in.It is in all sorts of conditions and has
NOT failed yet.
wayne
|
148.100 | A 40 year house? | SQM::LANDMAN | | Thu Jan 21 1988 16:58 | 3 |
| I've seen ads for wood foundations, guaranteed for 40 years. How
do you replace it, bearing in mind that a house should last for
hundreds of years?
|
148.101 | Wood wouldn't crack would it | GLORY::CHAPMAN | Jim Chapman DTN 456-5593 | Thu Jan 21 1988 17:09 | 4 |
| What sort of a guarantee do you get with a concrete foundation.
It seems like there have been several cracked walls in previous
notes.
|
148.102 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Fri Jan 22 1988 13:00 | 10 |
| > What sort of a guarantee do you get with a concrete foundation.
> It seems like there have been several cracked walls in previous
> notes.
A cracked foundation wall may let in some water, but it will still hold up a
house.
A rotted foundation isn't much good for anything.
Paul
|
148.103 | | VLNVAX::HEDERSTEDT | T.B.S. | Tue Jan 26 1988 23:16 | 25 |
|
The wood foundation can be fixed on the fly MUCH easer than concrete
one.The wood has not seen ANY damage to the test pieces in 40+ years.
The treatment in the wood going into these foundations is 2x the
amount.
Due to the type of house I am building the foundation has to be
exactly right.Not that easy with concrete.Not to easy to fix a slight
measurment mistake.
It can be put up in all weather types (read that winter time).Not
that easy with concrete.Concrete also need a footing or should have
one. This makes great dam to collect water.If the drainage is done
right there should be no problem.Its tough to find somone to pour
a foundation and garanity (sp?) a dry basement.I will get that
with the wood one.
Its not a new idea,just slow getting accepted.It is also a well
proven idea.
Excuse the spelling but its been a looooog day and I am to tired
to look up my spelling errors...
wayne
|
148.170 | Block foundation vs Poured | JENEVR::TUSIA | This space intentionally left | Sat Apr 23 1988 02:52 | 7 |
| I would like to know the pros and cons of using a poured foundation
verus a block foundation. Both foundations would be on a poured
footings. This is for a 24 x 26 garage. The reason I ask is that
a poured foundation is $300.00 more than a block one.
Thanks Dick
|
148.171 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Sat Apr 23 1988 12:21 | 22 |
| I'm sure a lot of this is personal opinion, but personally I
will always go with poured concrete. I don't think much of
concrete block; I don't like the looks of it, and there is
no way that it is as durable. Having said that, in your case
it would probably not matter at all which you used, except for
aesthetics and personal bias. Assuming you've got good footings
below the frost line, either kind of wall will be there long
after the garage falls down. I assume the garage is going to
be on more or less level ground so the foundation walls are not
going to be acting as any kind of retaining walls (as they would
in a basement, for example). If the walls are going to be acting
as retaining walls, the poured wall would of course be stronger,
but in fact people build contrete block retaining walls all the
time and they work fine. Probably only about 2 rows of block will
be above ground, so it won't even show much.
I'm a bit surprised that poured concrete is more; I'd heard that
below about 5' high, poured concrete was cheaper than block, that
block became cheaper only when you had to begin lifting the concrete
to pour it. I may be misinformed on that one though. Have you
gotten another estimate? It may be that your contractor is a
cement-block man and would have to subcontract the wall if it were
poured, hence the markup.
|
148.172 | DIY is cheap, but takes $time$ | VAXWRK::BSMITH | Carnival Personnel Only...DAMN! | Mon Apr 25 1988 12:14 | 4 |
| I priced out a 24X26 foundation for a garage, blocked, with my own labor
was about $600, a poured one is about $1300.
Brad.
|
148.173 | ex | VLNVAX::LEVESQUE | The Dukes a DINK! | Mon Apr 25 1988 15:18 | 5 |
|
rep -1
Do your prices include the digging thats required??
|
148.174 | How much do you charge (discharge) yourself? | FSLENG::LEVESQUE | SET/HINDSIGHT = 20/20 | Mon Apr 25 1988 16:18 | 11 |
| It's always tough to put a price on your own labor. If you have
the time, skill, and patience, then DIY. I built a garage 3 years
ago and have a poured foundation. My neighbor also built a garage
2 years ago and he had footings poured, and did the block foundation
himself.
Myself, I'd rather be playing softball!
I once bought a grapple-load of wood to cut and split. Never again!
Ted
|
148.175 | Just block vs concrete comparison | VAXWRK::BSMITH | Carnival Personnel Only...DAMN! | Mon Apr 25 1988 18:12 | 8 |
| No, I was just quoting the various foundation 'costs'.
Backhoes in my area fetch about $50 an hour, so figure about 4 hours
to dig it. I am inclined to agree with the previous reply, the
600 or 700 dollar difference isn't enough to justify a summers
worth of block laying. The chimney on the other hand was a different
story.
Brad.
|
148.176 | skim coat is another technique | FREDW::MATTHES | | Mon Apr 25 1988 19:15 | 34 |
| I laid my own block when I built my garage 3 years ago. My foundation
guy - the one with the forms - back out at the last minute.
My neighbor came over and told me his story when he built his garage.
Said it took him one summer to lay the block and one to build the
garge. Seems I remember buying around 900 block. At 30 blocks
a night, after work, (that's a lot of blocks after you've already
worked all day), That's 30 nights. Estimate 2 months.
I wound up 'dry stacking' the block and then applying a structural
skin coat. There are 2 types foundation coat and another I forget
the name of. One is waterproof, the other is a little more
aesthetically pleasing. It's cement and fiberglass fibers 3/4"
long. The fibers overlap enough to give it strength.
You mortar the first course to the footing and stack the rest using
plastic shims to keep it level where necessary. I filled every
5 or so vertical columns with cement and rebar just for kicks.
They recomend this in the corners if I remember. The top course
you use a bonding beam block that once filled with cement gives
a continuous piece of concrete along the top.
It took about 2 weeks to stack and fill and skim coat. You apply
a skim coat of about 1/8" thick on both sides just like applying
plaster or joint compound. It's a LOT heavier than plaster though.
Price worked out to be the same as if I'd poured concrete in forms.
This is cement price only. I traded my time for what the forms
guy would have charged.
It was a lot of work and I would have preferred to have it poured.
At the time I would have had to wait 2 months for someone to get
me in their queue. I wanted to do it then. Not that I have any
problems with the foundation. It's stood up fine and if I didn't
tell you, you would not be able to tell it had not been poured.
|
148.7 | rebuilding a sill with epoxy | PSTJTT::TABER | Touch-sensitive software engineering | Wed Jun 08 1988 15:43 | 25 |
| This looks like a reasonable place to ask...
I've got a piece of rotted sill that needs to be fixed. The two options
we have are (1) jacking the house and replacing with a new beam or (2)
reconstructing the old beam using the new epoxy materials made for that
sort of thing.
I'm leaning toward the reconstruction method, since it means we wouldn't
have to jack the house and possibly crack the walls in the section that
we just renovated. Reconstruction of the beam occurs in two parts.
First, a thin penetrating epoxy "consolodant" ("Wood-epox" is the
brand-name) is forced into the wood that sinks in and builds up the
fibers that remain, filling any voids or insect damage. Then an epoxy
putty is used to rebuild the parts of the beam that were destroyed. The
result is supposed to be as strong or stronger than the original sill,
and as a side-benefit is now impervious to water and/or bugs.
Has anyone out there had this done? The literature provided to our
contractor from the company that makes the stuff makes it look real
good; it has the usual glowing reports from people who restore old
houses for a living, and a copy of an article from Mechanix Illustrated
praising the stuff. OK, I expect that from sales lit -- I have this
file to give me the dark side...
anyone?
>>>==>PStJTT
|
148.8 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Jun 08 1988 16:50 | 25 |
| What kind of construction is the house? Post and beam, or modern
2xN framing? If it's modern, with a 2x4 or 2x6 sill or whatever,
it is no big deal to jack it up and replace the sill, assuming you
have a basement and can get under that area. I just had part of
a foundation replaced, and I was amazed at how easily they did it.
Assuming it's modern stick-built:
If it's not a load-bearing wall (the ends of the floor joists don't
rest on the sill) you don't have to do anything except take out
the old sill and put in the new one.
If it's a load-bearing wall, you can put a large timber (say about
a 6x8) across the bottom of the floor joists about 2' in from the
foundation wall and jack at several spots along that to take the
load off the sill. The ends of the floor joists go under the sole
plate of the wall above, and will support it just fine.
Notice that you don't have to actually LIFT anything to speak of;
the idea is to just take the load off the sill. Just enough so you
know the sill isn't carrying any weight, but no more.
I'm not sure how you'd replace a sill in post and beam construction,
but for somebody who knows what they're doing it would probably
not be a big deal. I would tend to go for replacement, rather than
the epoxy patch route, because I'd worry that the epoxy patch would
not keep the sill from rotting further. As far as I know, the only
sure way to keep rot from spreading is to remove it completely.
Sort of like rust on a car; painting over it doesn't help for long.
|
148.9 | oh yeah... | PSTJTT::TABER | Touch-sensitive software engineering | Wed Jun 08 1988 17:03 | 14 |
| Hmmm...I suppose I should have mentioned how the house was built. The
house is an 1880-ish Victorian farmhouse with a baloon frame. The sills
are 8x10 inch (real measure) oak beams. We are fortunate in that during
the renovation we took a beam out of one of the walls that is long
enough to use for a patch if we go that route. I think the baloon frame
means that there is no weight carried by the walls, so it should be
the simpler of the cases you mention.
I'm not sure if the joists rest on top of the beam or if they are set in
notches. If the latter, it will be a real drag to have to cut the
notches, but as Bob Villa used to say before he went big time, "That's
the sort of thing you can do yourself and save money."
>>>==>PStJTT
|
148.10 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Jun 08 1988 19:03 | 11 |
| Nope, you don't have the simple case. The simple case is the
platform frame, where the wall 2x4s sit on a sole plate which
sits on a subfloor which sits on the floor joists which extend
under the wall area.
The balloon frame may not be a problem either, but I'm not sure
just how yours might have been done. I think there were several
variants of the balloon frame (probably dozens or hundreds,
according to the whim of the particular carpenter) and it all
depends on how the walls are related to the floor joists. Basically,
you want to be sure that if you lift the floor joists you're going
to lift the wall too, and not just push the floor up.
|
148.56 | how much cure time? | TAMARA::FLEISCHER | Bob, DTN 381-0895, ZKO3-2/T63, BOSE A/D | Thu Jun 09 1988 18:12 | 9 |
| I am trying to validate an estimate I was just given for the
construction time of a 2600 sq foot colonial house. In
particular I was questioning whether a poured concrete
foundation can be built upon two weeks after the start of the
excavation for the cellar hole. Does the concrete require
any curing period before the framing can begin?
Thanks,
Bob
|
148.57 | | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Jun 09 1988 19:06 | 10 |
| I wish I had a number for you but I don't. I was shocked when the forms people
removed the forms the day after pouring the foudation. The answer was that the
stuff sets a lot quicker than you think. I had started putting on my decking
about a week after the forms came down. The concrete people told me they've
seen builders start the day the forms were removed.
My guess would be 2 weeks would be enough time, but if I were you I'd get
something more official than me. 8-)
-mark
|
148.58 | How long to cure | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Thu Jun 09 1988 19:16 | 6 |
| For my addition they poured the concrete one day. Stripped the
forms the next morning and started building the day after that.
I assume they could have started building the same day the forms
were stripped, if they wanted to.
Two weeks should be enough time.
|
148.11 | Replace with modern design | VIDEO::AXELROD | | Thu Jun 09 1988 20:46 | 24 |
| A carpenter replaced my rotted sill beam by splicing modern sill plate
and joist construction into the structure. This is a description of
what you'd find if you look at it, not a chronology. (I had already
applied 4 jack posts to the ~10 foot area before he arrived.)
He pulled out all of the old beam, removed fieldstone to lower the top
of the foundation to below the bottom line of the existing joists,
leveled the top of the remaining fieldstone with concrete topped by a
conventional sillplate. He spiked pieces of 2 X 8 (or 10, can't
remember) planking from about 4 feet back right along each of the
joists and across the sill plate. Where the studs came down (generally
on or next to the joists, wouldn't have mattered with a beam), he
added short pieces of planking spiked to the joists to support them.
He closed the outside with the usual vertical piece whose name I've
forgotten.
The point is that the work involved in notching a new sill for
the old joists is pointless. The beam is expensive, hard to handle,
and when you look at the small portion of notched-in joist that gets
to support the weight, the modern construction technique looks far
stronger. To my mind, definitely a case of a newer technology giving
better performance at lower cost.
Glenn
|
148.59 | Two weeks and the stuff is dry..... | CYGNUS::VHAMBURGER | Common Sense....isn't | Fri Jun 10 1988 13:06 | 18 |
|
The usual test for concrete in special jobs, eg. high strength
requirements, is to test the concrete after 28 or 30 days, I don't remember
which. At that time it has something like 98% of it's full strengh and is
fully cured. At 2 weeks, it should have probably 90-95% of its full strengh
and be more than usable. The 30 day wait is for jobs involving "public
safety" type construction, high rise construction, and such.
Remember too, even if you start building on the stuff 2 days after
pouring, you will not have a whole lot of weight on it until a few weeks
later unless the contractor throws a dozen carpenters or a pre-fab house
onto the foundation! You get most of your weight with the addition of the
roof, drywall, and other finishing materials.
Two weeks should be fine.
Vic
|
148.60 | 2 whole weeks? | HARPO::CACCIA | the REAL steve | Fri Jun 10 1988 14:17 | 18 |
|
In a past life I built concrete foundations for a living.
We would build forms in the morning , pour in the afternoon, strip
forms the next working day, (Usually the next morning) and the
framing would normally start within a week. ON ROUTINE HOUSE SIZES
This is like your basic single family max 2 floors and attic type
house. As stated previously it takes a week of work before you get
to the really heavy stuff and by that time you foundation has cured
to the point there should be no problems.
We put in the foundation for one of the dorms at URI in Rhode Island
and on that job we took three days to set the forms, nealry four
hours of truck after truck of hot mix, hours of shaking and smoothing
the slab floor, left the forms on for two days, and the construction
didn't start for almost three weeks. But that like I said was a
dorm tower and used steel frames insetead of wood etc.
|
148.61 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Jun 10 1988 14:37 | 47 |
| First thing, even *BAD* concrete can support over a ton per square
inch, so with a house foundation there is no need to worry about
load capacity. Given that, what determines the strength of concrete.
Two major things:
1. The amount of water in the mix. The stiffer the mix (the less
water), the stronger the concrete, given that you have enough
water to fully hydrate the cement. A stiff mix is about 5 gallons
of water to a sack of cement. 6 gallons gives a more workable
concrete. Strength begins to fall off if you get up to 7 or
8 gallons. In general, if the concrete will stand up in a pile
pretty well by itself it's probably a good mix. If it's so runny
that it flows out level, it's too wet.
2. The rate of drying. Concrete hardens by chemical reaction with
the water, not by drying out. Therefore, the water has to stay
around long enough for the chemical reaction to occur fully.
If the concrete dries out too fast, the concrete won't be as
strong. For maximum strength, concrete ought to cure in a moist
atmosphere for up to 28 days. Actually, concrete keeps getting
stronger pretty much "forever", but as mentioned in the previous
reply, after 28 days it's at full strength for all practical
purposes. And hardly anybody does 28-day moist cures, except
(as noted) for safety-critical jobs. If you keep the concrete
moist for 2 weeks it's almost as good, and for most jobs 1 week
is plenty. And for house foundations hardly anybody even does
that anymore. Nowadays they use "high early strength" concrete
and the concept of cure time has pretty much gone away for house
foundations.
So, what can (or should) you do. You don't *need* to do anything,
really; your foundation will be perfectly adequate pretty much no
matter how they do it. And, if it sits for two weeks it will be
hard. But, if you've got that two weeks, you can do a few
things to make the concrete a little better. For one thing, leave
the forms on for at least three days. Cover the top of the forms
so the top of the wall doesn't dry out. Spray with water if necessary.
The forms are a little harder to get off if they stay on for an
extended time though, and the forms company probably
won't want to have their forms tied up any longer than they can
help it, so they may take the forms off in 1 day. If they do, no
problem; get some 4- or 6-mil plastic and put over the concrete,
pull it tight and seal it up as well as you can, and try to get
some kind of shade over it to keep the sun off. You want to maintain
a good moist atmosphere. Let it sit there. In general, the idea
is to have the concrete stay moist and cool for as long as possible.
But if you can't do any of this, don't worry about it.
|
148.62 | Concrete answers | VIDEO::DCL | David Larrick | Mon Jun 13 1988 00:39 | 33 |
| Pay closer attention to Bob's question in .13, folks. He's not talking
about a two-week cure time at all:
.13> In
.13> particular I was questioning whether a poured concrete
.13> foundation can be built upon two weeks after the start of the
.13> excavation for the cellar hole. Does the concrete require
.13> any curing period before the framing can begin?
It sounds as though the steps that need to occur over two weeks are as
follows, with annotations based on my limited experience:
1. Excavate: a day or two, more only if complex
2. Set up forms: half a day to a day
3. Pour concrete: an hour or two
4. Let concrete set in forms: overnight
5. Remove forms: half day
6. Additional cure time, if any: sounds as though you don't really need any,
and that any you might get is better than none
7. Backfill: half a day to a day
None of these steps is inherently weather-dependent, although they'd all be
pretty miserable in a downpour. So I think your chief schedule risk is
having the contractors show up on schedule. There don't seem to be any
technological or meteorological reasons to schedule more than two weeks for
these steps.
From sad experience: you might do yourself a great favor to check the
forms setup and the pour level, and to get any discrepancies resolved
immediately. You can't pour more concrete on top once the first batch has
set...
|
148.177 | Door in stone foundation | SAGE::DERAMO | | Mon Jun 20 1988 16:34 | 29 |
| I need to replace my basement door. I'd like to install a new steel
door -- the 32" width will fit very nicely. I've installed doors
before, but never in an uneven opening of a fieldstone foundation.
I don't want to use the same installation technique as the current
door -- it is secured on the sides only to mortar that was poured
into the uneven space between the foundation and the door frame.
The mortar has separated from the foundation, and is in several
pieces. Thus, the door frame now "floats."
What I think may be a good idea is to secure the frame of the new
steel door directly to the foundation. To do this, I would need
to drill into stones on both sides of the doorway, and screw lag
bolts through the frame into these. I thought that three holes
on each side would be sufficient to secure the door. I have a sill
above the door for securing the top.
I need some feedback on this idea. Is there another way of securing
the door frame to the foundation? Any tips to offer on installation?
How do I drill the holes in the stone? I've heard that masonry
bits won't do stone. Are there special bits that will do stone?
I worry a little about using impact jackhammer-type drills, as I
don't want to loosen the stones from the foundation.
Thanks for any advice,
Joe
|
148.178 | door in field stone foundation | IOENG::FENUCCIO | There's no place like Mass | Tue Jun 21 1988 16:42 | 13 |
|
I have the same project comming up soon and I have been thinking
about it a lot. I don't think there is anything on the market that
will drill into stone, so u have to drill in the concrete and use
lag bolts/screws. The best way is to chip away all the old concrete
and put up a form and poor new concrete therefore giving u a place
to put your mounting hardware.
Even better is to leave up the 2x4 form and use that to secure
the new door.
Good luck
john
|
148.179 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Jun 21 1988 17:13 | 13 |
| I think I'd clean out all the old mortar and whatever, and wash
down the rocks so they're clean. Build a form and pour a rectangular
concrete rough opening, which will be a trick because building a
tight form around random rocks is hard, and it's hard to get the
concrete to flow well around the rocks too.
If you've got lots of patience, you can drill rock with a star drill
and a 2-pound hammer. Basically, a star drill is sort of like a
cold chisel with an "X" point on it. You whack it, rotate it about
1/8 turn, and whack it again. Repeat for about an hour per hole.
If there is enough space, you might consider squaring up the opening
by laying up a brick wall on each side, behind which you could
fill in with concrete as you went.
|
148.180 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Tue Jun 21 1988 17:52 | 5 |
|
A good carbide drill bit, in a jack-hammer type drill, will
go through the rock no problem. The percussion type drills are
not so tough to disturb the wall itself, so don't worry about
it coming down unless it's in bad shape already.
|
148.147 | Cracking fieldstone foundation? | CORNIS::BELKIN | Babylon by DECNET | Fri Jul 29 1988 18:46 | 46 |
|
I discovered this file a few days ago and have been reading all the
notes on LEAD PAINT REMOVAL and ASBESTOS REMOVAL. I feel like a walking
dead man - I wonder if I'll die of lead poisening before I get the asbestosis...
But onto a cheerier subject, and the topic of this note.
I have an 80ish year 2-story-with attic frame old house in Methuen, Ma.
It has a fieldstone foundation that is CRACKING in the S.E. corner. Before my
housemate quick-and-dirty repointed the outside wall, you could see light
through the crack and of course feel lotsa cold air leaking. The crack
is about a pinky finger wide, at the thickest. There are several cracks, but
the widest one is about 2 feet from the corner, just by a window.
I also have cracking floor jousts right in that corner of the house,
and sagging floors in the 1st and 2nd floor living rooms above. Unfortuataly,
I have a lot of heavy stereo and video equipment in my 2nd floor living room
(BIG speakers and TV, several feet of records and reel to reel tapes, etc.).
Luckily my housemate has almost nothing in his living room.
We are thinking of jacking up the cracking floor joist, but it seems
to us that the foundation in that corner has to be rebuilt. My questions are:
1) how "bad" is "bad" ? How nasty is this?
2) Causes ? The basement is dry - but in that corner of that house (actually,
several corners) the (old) wood shingles have pulled back, I'm sure that
water can get into the sheathing. Can water the percolate down to the
fieldstones, weakening the cement or mortar or whatever sticks them
together? This problem corner (the southeast side) is right by the
driveway, there is concrete with a good downward slope right up to the
foundation. I don't think much water was getting in there, but I sealed
around the whole house with tar anyway (it needed it).
Or would the foundation, and floor jousts, just crack from age? Would
extra (unforseen in the original design of the house) weight up in the
attic aggrevate the situation? The attic was finished with 3 bedrooms,
would the extra building material add a lot of weight? Too many layers
of shingles on the roof?
3) Fixing it. If it does need to be rebuild (the corner jacked up and the
fieldstones fixed somehow) about how much does this cost?
I guess this note is kinda long but I wanted to describe the situation.
I've read all the notes on jacking. Thanks in advance for any advice....
Josh Belkin
|
148.148 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Jul 29 1988 19:53 | 10 |
|
It takes surprisingly little to hold up a house. You can probably
go for years the way you are, based on your description. I don't
think you need to panic about it. A few warps and sags add
"character". :-) But if you're worried you might want to
get a few people to come look at it and give estimates. It may
help you to sort out what you need to do if you can talk to a few
people about it. In general, cracks are no big deal. You need to
get concerned when the wall starts bulging inward.
|
148.149 | No bulging walls yet!! :-) | CORNIS::BELKIN | Babylon by DECNET | Mon Aug 01 1988 14:07 | 26 |
| re < Note 1557.4 by MTWAIN::WELLCOME "Steve Wellcome (Maynard)" >
> go for years the way you are, based on your description. I don't
Well, thats a relief. I've wanted to try the trick of epoxying
a glass microscope slide across the crack, and seeing if it breaks in a
few days/weeks/months, but havent gotten 'round tuit.
One possible aggravating factor is that there will be some construction
going on a 1/2 mile up the street, and there will be a lot of heavy
equipment traffic. That part of the house is about 15 feet from the edge of
the road. I could do without the "bad vibes"....
Will the interior fieldstone walls crumble less slowly if I were
to keep the basement dry with a dehumidifier? Or would that make it worse?
Is there any way of patching up the wall to make it a more-or-less
planar surface again (the way it was when first built) ? In a few places,
the mortar between the stones has eroded away 2 or 3 inches (particularly in one
spot near the floor that seems damper than the rest). This spot is nearest to
where the original furnace used to be. I imagine it was a large clunker of an
oil furnace (the old oil tank is still down there). Would have radiated heat
from the old furnace accelerated the deterioration ?
thanks for the help!
Josh Belkin
|
148.150 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Aug 01 1988 17:20 | 4 |
| I don't think interior dampness or lack thereof will make much
difference. On the other hand, gutters or properly sloping
ground to keep water from building up on the outside should help.
|
148.151 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Tue Aug 02 1988 12:53 | 4 |
| There's an article in the current issue of Fine Homebuilding on repairing
fieldstone foundations.
Paul
|
148.195 | Using crushed stone as a foundation | ALIEN::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Wed Aug 31 1988 13:07 | 16 |
| Here's a new foundation question. I'm building a set of brick front steps, and
since part of it will be attached to the house, I wanted to make sure that it
wouldn't move. So I dug down to frost line, and I was going to put in a
concrete footing, lay up cinder block around the perimeter up to the surface,
fill the interior with crushed stone, and then pour concrete over the top. I
decided that I didn't need a wall in the back against the house, since the
stone would support it well enough. And then I got to thinking - if I don't
need the block there, why do I need it at all? Why can't I simply fill the
hole up to the surface with stone, and the pour the concrete over the top? I'm
not afraid of it heaving, since any water will drain right out, and the soil is
well down below frost line.
Can anyone think of a reason why this won't work? It certainly is a lot easier
to throw stone in a hole than it is to pour footings and build up a block wall.
Paul
|
148.196 | won't work ALL the time | FREDW::MATTHES | | Wed Aug 31 1988 13:38 | 12 |
| Don't you have to worry about a cumulative effect?? You say the
water will drain right out - the first few times. If you get periods
of thawing and freezing you'd get an ice dam I think. The slush
prevents draining and then that freezes. You get more rain and
the temp isn't quite warm enough to melt a foot below ground and
you get a pocket of water that freezes that night.
I suspect that it's one of those things that's just fine for 8 years
and then you get just the right climatic series of events over a
winter and the steps are now an inch and a half higher in one corner.
Just guessing ...
|
148.197 | What about Sona (sp?0 Tubes! | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Wed Aug 31 1988 16:02 | 11 |
| I agree with .1, another advantage of a good solid block (use concrete
block instead of cinder)is its stability. a good footing and foundation
below you steps will reduce any kind of settling whether it be caused
by frost or compaction after the fact. I assume your going to put
a roof or something over these steps which will have its support
poles resting on top of the steps, Right? Otherwise you could let
the whole structure free float on top of the stone, with no need
for a footing/foundation below the frost line. One other suggestion
might be to use sono tubes instead of a block foundation. It's alot
quicker and easier!
|
148.198 | Been wondering | PONDVU::GAGNON | | Wed Aug 31 1988 16:37 | 6 |
| I have been wondering about this also. I want to build some front
steps to my house with some wrought iron railings. There is nothing
else that will be attached to the stairs and they will be partially
covered by the overhang of the house. It's a split entry.
Do I need to dig down below the frost line and put footings in or
can I just set it right there on the surface?
|
148.199 | | POOL::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Wed Aug 31 1988 19:23 | 12 |
| I read something somewhere a few years back about curshed stone
foundations. The point being made was that the do fine, providing
that they are properly compacted nad very well drained. The only
problems occur if they are wet and then freze. My reactionwas "Now
how in the hell do I keep the foudnation dry when it rains?" And
it often rains just before the front blow thourg and the
temperature drops. It doesn't take great powers of observation to
see that this has NOT become a popular constsruction technique.
I suggest that if you don't put a full foundation under your steps
you should not fasten it to your house/foundation. Then if it
settles a bit you can just ignor it or jack it up and re-set it.
|
148.200 | Concrete Stairs and Walks | EXPRES::FERRARO | | Thu Sep 01 1988 01:24 | 17 |
| You really don't want to attach any sort of concrete work to your
foundation. The reason being that the different masses are going
to expand and contract at different rates. So therefore no matter
how deep you dig you will get heaving and/or cracking at the joints.
My best idea for your project would be to set a bed of crushed stone
6 to 8 inches thick the width and lenght of your walk. Then layer
screed (not screen)across the stone and support it so that when
the concrete if poured you have a metal net weaved into your walk.
Screed is basically the same as screen but on a much heavier scale.
One very important item is that you shouldn't have a block of concrete
greater than 64 sq. ft. (8 x 8).
Once you have your base set you can build or pour a set of stairs
to your needs and liking.
|
148.202 | sona tubes vs foundation | CIMNET::GOSSELIN | | Thu Sep 01 1988 12:33 | 10 |
| What determine the use of a poured foundation or sona tubes? I know
some people who have built a large screened porch and used a cement
foundation and someone who added a 14' x 16' family room and used
sona tubes. My wife and I are thinking of a possible family room
some day (some day!!!) and wonder which way to go. Both of the
type supporting foundations above were recommended by different
contractors. Is it by choice or reason?
thanks
Ed
|
148.203 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Thu Sep 01 1988 12:53 | 13 |
| There are several other notes that touch on this subject - see note 1111.30.
But none that specifically address the question of why one over the other.
So - I would use a foundation if I were planning on insulating the floor. For
an addition, I'd rather not have the winter winds howling around down there,
the room will stay warmer with a foundation. Plus I should have less little
critters coming in to get out of the weather.
For a porch or deck that's not going to be heated or closed in, I'd use
sonotubes. The whole thing's outside anyway, all I want to do is hold it up
off the ground, and it's cheaper.
Paul
|
148.204 | Comparative costs requested | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Thu Sep 01 1988 15:50 | 6 |
| If anybody has comparative costs, please post here.
I am particularly interested in New England, e.g.
what is the probability of digging four "post holes" @the 4 corners
of a pre-specified rectangle in the rocky soil of New England without
resorting to major equipment?
|
148.205 | | CIMNET::GOSSELIN | | Thu Sep 01 1988 16:17 | 0 |
148.206 | The glaciers stopped in my back yard | PALMER::PALMER | half a bubble off plumb | Thu Sep 01 1988 17:12 | 10 |
| RE .2
It cost me $75 to rent a post hole digger from U haul and
lunch and beer for two friends to dig 4 4' deep 10" diameter
holes for sonatubes. Total time was about 4 miserable hours.
The tubes were about $20. I paid $50 for 1/2 yard of premixed
cement.
A one man digger takes two people or one giant to run, I don't
even want to think about the two man digger.
=Ralph=
|
148.209 | Concrete foundation is crumbling where paint is peeling | ASIC::CRITCHLOW | | Thu Sep 01 1988 18:14 | 25 |
| I have a question about repairing my 75+ yr old poured concrete
foundation.
On the south side of the house there are several spots where the
paint has peeled of and some of the concrete underneath has begun
to chip away. The larger areas are about 12" in diameter and are
chipped or flaked out 1/2 to 1" in places. The exposed concrete
appears to be soft and crumbly in these areas as well. It also is
holding some moisture due to the fact that it gets repeatedly splashed
during hard rains from nearby steps. In fact, there are a couple
of places where moss is growing.
Is there something that I should use to fix those areas? Also, is
there a better paint to put on the foundation? I suspect that previous
owners used regular latex in the past. There are several layers
in places.
Or, maybe there is a coating I should consider putting on the whole
thing that would look nice and hold up better? It might be tough
to put this on over old paint though...
I will take all suggestions,
JC
|
148.207 | | CURIE::BBARRY | | Fri Sep 02 1988 20:00 | 16 |
|
Technical:
The load bearing capacity of the soil will determine if you would
have to use a poured foundation. The load bearing capacity is
measured in pounds(or tons)/sq-ft of footing.
Aesthetical:
For a year round living space you do not want insulation hanging
down or joists circumventing the insulation. On the other hand,
if you have a sloped yard the poured foundation would stickout to
high above ground.
Legal:
The local codes or building inspector may have a preference.
Brian
|
148.210 | Out with the old...In with the new | EXPRES::FERRARO | | Fri Sep 02 1988 21:52 | 9 |
| As far a patching the concrete that has chipped away and crumbling,
use a mortar chisel and remove all the soft and crumbly stuff.
If you don't remove all the loose stuff anything you apply will
fall off within weeks. After all the loose concrete is removed
use premixed sand mix (sakrete, quikcrete) and fill the voids.
As far as a paint or finish is concerned there is a special paint
on the market made for concrete which will also help to waterproof
your foundation. Brand name "ULG".
|
148.208 | | CIMNET::GOSSELIN | | Tue Sep 13 1988 11:27 | 5 |
| Thanks Brian,
I do have a sloped back yard and because of the cost I would
find it more affordable to go with the sona tubes. I could do the base
with latic and bushes to give it a finishing touch.
Ed
|
148.201 | Think About Pre-Cast Instead. | DOLT::KAPINOS | | Tue Oct 11 1988 12:22 | 14 |
|
My front stairs are poured, solid steps. Over the years they have
settled. The first step down from the house is now quite a drop.
I'm now considering using a jackhammer to break up this huge mass
of concrete and put in precast steps. The precast steps are only
attached to the house's foundation with brackets that let every-
thing move. The front of the steps rest on the ground and are free
to move up and down with the landscape.
Given the amount of work, dollars and eventual aggrevation of poured
steps I'd put in precast.
|
148.152 | Cement has turned into DUST! | CADSE::SIMONICH | | Thu Nov 17 1988 18:15 | 13 |
|
I have a fieldstone foundation which I repointed on the outside,
but in the basement there are sections where the cement between
the stones has literally turned into powder. My question is why
did this happen on the inside of the house and not the outside,
and how should it be fixed.
Thanks for the help,
Dave
|
148.153 | is it horsehair plaster? | TFH::DONNELLY | Take my advice- Don't listen to me | Fri Nov 18 1988 16:18 | 17 |
| > but in the basement there are sections where the cement between
> the stones has literally turned into powder. My question is why
Are you sure it's cement (or mortar)? I had a fieldstone foundation which
was mortared on the outside but on the inside there was just wall plaster
which was applied to stop drafts. The outside was very nicely done with
round fieldstone and pointed nicely too. The inside was rough and ugly
rocks with large gaps in many places, which in turn was filled with this
horrible, old, dry, powdery, horsehair plaster. It was then covered with a
thick paint of some type but in many places this was deteriorated and then
the dry plaster crumbled to dust. I repaired many areas with real mortar
and this was very time comsuming. Since I was only stopping drafts I would
probably plaster myself next time. At any rate, if you find horsehair in
the crumbly places that is a pretty good indicator that it's plaster you're
faced with.
Craig
|
148.154 | It's probably mortar | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Fri Nov 18 1988 17:00 | 14 |
|
>> > but in the basement there are sections where the cement between
>> > the stones has literally turned into powder. My question is why
>>
>> Are you sure it's cement (or mortar)? I had a fieldstone foundation which
>> was mortared on the outside but on the inside there was just wall plaster
>> which was applied to stop drafts.
This is a common thing (based on what I've seen) to happen to old
mortar. Older mortar was a different formulation than the type
used now, I believe.
-tm
|
148.155 | No it's not plaster. | CADSE::SIMONICH | | Fri Nov 18 1988 18:52 | 9 |
|
Yes it is either, or used to be, old cement or mortar. I was hoping
that there may be something that may be applied which would harden
this stuff up some, so as to at least keep down on the dust piles
showing up on the floor.
Dave
|
148.156 | hot lime | SVCRUS::KROLL | | Tue Nov 22 1988 22:54 | 7 |
| I had an expert look at time and he called it hot lime. they used
to use this before the advent of concrete products.
mine is painted too. sections have fallen out and I am patching
it with sand concrete and stucco over all. now that I am living
in the north I add something called x-100 to the concrete and c-21
to the stucco. makes it dry better and water proff too.
|
148.157 | mortar mix vs sand mix | TFH::DONNELLY | Take my advice- Don't listen to me | Wed Nov 23 1988 11:17 | 9 |
| > mine is painted too. sections have fallen out and I am patching
> it with sand concrete and stucco over all. now that I am living
> in the north I add something called x-100 to the concrete and c-21
> to the stucco. makes it dry better and water proff too.
Mortar mix sticks to verical surfaces better and is generally more workable
than sand mix. I don't know if it works as well with your additives.
Craig
|
148.211 | Breaking foundation pins | PAMOLA::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Mon Nov 28 1988 17:48 | 12 |
| We've got pins sticking out of our new foundation. BILLLLIONS of 'em. Our
excavator, in his estimate, said he'd break the pins and tar the foundation.
Well, he broke the pins on the outside, tarred, and back-filled. The pins are
still on the inside. So we learn.
Our excavator described his technique for breaking pins - take your car's
pneumatic jack pipe thingie, place it over the pin, bend it back and forth
a few times, and it snaps off (the pin I mean). Assuming the pins are
adequately sealed on the outside, it seems that the excavator-recommended
method will cause the pin to wobble around before the end snaps off, and that
this wobble will likely compromise (break) the tarred seal. Yes No?
Any other suggestions for breaking these foundation pins - upwards of 400
of them?
|
148.212 | It Worked For Us | SALEM::VINCENT | | Mon Nov 28 1988 18:00 | 4 |
| We did that 25 years ago, on my father's house foundation. We beat
them off with a hammer. The have not leaked to this day.
TPV
|
148.213 | removing foundation pins | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Mon Nov 28 1988 18:07 | 20 |
| > Well, he broke the pins on the outside, tarred, and back-filled. The pins are
>still on the inside. So we learn.
Hopefully, what you learned was not to use that excavator again.
You're right that when you break off the pins, many of them will
move loose.
I think it depends on what he used to do the tar. If he used regular
foundation sealer I don't think it was very waterproof to begin
with. So it doesn't make much difference.
If he sealed it with something like roofing cement, it's
pliable enough so it might still hold the seal even after the pin
moves.
If he used hydraulic cement (not likely), then you'd have a problem
because this would break the seal on some of them.
|
148.214 | | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Which way to Tahiti? | Mon Nov 28 1988 19:22 | 7 |
|
If you're worried about loosening them, try a Sawzall with a metal
blade. Get a long blade that will flex a little. It should cut
through them pretty quickly. But I think just wacking them with
a hammer (w goggles) will be just fine.
Phil
|
148.215 | Shouldn't be a problem | WORSEL::DOTY | Russell Doty, ESG | Mon Nov 28 1988 20:57 | 10 |
| uh -- if the pins move, don't you have a much worse problem than
leaks -- like an extremely unsound foundation?
I believe that the solid concrete wall will keep the pins totally
immobile except for the part you break off.
You might visit your local hardware store and get a four to six
foot chunk of inch or inch and a half iron water pipe -- gives you
more "authority" for the pins.
|
148.216 | | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Mon Nov 28 1988 23:08 | 7 |
| The method I used was to bend the pin over, put a pipe over the pin and in about
1/2 twist it will break. I guess if the foundation is really solid the pin
won't move, but I'd sure be scared of opening a leak. How about trying it with
the top row of pins and see what happens (odds are any leaks would come from
much lower). If the pins move, I'd think the only choice would be the sawzall.
-mark
|
148.217 | Break them off! | CADSE::ENGELHARDT | | Tue Nov 29 1988 10:30 | 13 |
| The pins ("form ties"?) are not that thick (5/16, 3/8 ?) and are
notched to facilitate breaking. An 18" piece of 1/2" iron pipe
would be ideal for slipping over and twisting.
The pin should break slightly behind the surface of the wall, leaving
a little dimple that can mortared in for good appearance.
The wall is certainly 8" thick and perhaps 10". There is no way
that the pin is going to loosen in that much concrete. Unless it
was specially greased to do just that. But what idiot would do
that?
Bob
|
148.219 | one more vote for the pipe method | DECSIM::DEMBA | | Tue Nov 29 1988 11:49 | 15 |
| I used the pipe over the "pin" method, it will go quicker than you
think. Get a piece of pipe with a small inside diameter, about 5/8"
will do. A couple of back and forth motions will make them snap off.
I guess that is why they call them 'snap' ties.
One other consideration, leave the top row of ties in the areas
where they won't be in the way or cause a dangerous situation. Because
you can hang all kinds of miscellaneous junk from them. They will
support a considerable amount of weight. But I usually play it safe
and just hang the lighter objects from them.
have fun, Steve
Ps: If you have the type that uses the large flat washer with the
small hole... save them. You will find uses for them later.
|
148.220 | | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Tue Nov 29 1988 12:01 | 6 |
| I would break them off the normal way using a pipe, then cover the
inside holes with hydralic cement. When you break them off, it will break
the outside seal on most of them.
I think that's the best you can do in this case.
|
148.221 | Bolt cutters | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Nov 29 1988 12:13 | 14 |
| I suspect that if the concrete is fairly new, you may have trouble
with wobbly pins if you bend them too much. But, since the excavator
has already twisted the pins from the outside, I'm not sure you'll
do significantly more damage from the inside, especially since the
concrete is now older (and harder) than it was when the excavator
broke the outside pins.
There are several designs of those things. Some are notched (as
mentioned) so they break off slightly below the surface (in theory).
Some are not; they're the same diameter all the way.
I've always seen contractors use large bolt cutters to cut them
off. They are soft steel, and cut pretty easily if the bolt cutters
are big enough. A great excuse to buy another tool!!!
|
148.222 | hammer-tar out-cement in | CSSE::CACCIA | the REAL steve | Tue Nov 29 1988 12:25 | 8 |
|
About a century ago I worked for a while building concrete foundations.
We broke the pins off when we took down the forms. A three pound hammer
and one or two good whacks was all it took. on the outside we sealed
with tar and on the inside with cement.(tar is hard to paint over)
as far as I know we never had a leak. The pins should not move in
the foundation, remember there is eight inches of concrete there.
|
148.223 | Put that in your pipe and . . . | WHYVAX::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Tue Nov 29 1988 15:29 | 18 |
| re: .several
Another vote for the pipe rather than the hammer. I put in my foundation
in '83. Tried the hammer bit for exactly one of the form ties and quickly
threw the hammer away in preference for the 18" pipe. Much easier. And
18" is the right length, too. The six footer that was suggested makes
for a lot more work.
I removed mine on the inside and out at the same time when the concrete
was about three days old. I only recall a couple wiggling. These were
round ties, however. When I put in my foundation for my addition two
years ago they used square ties - they didn't move at all when bent off.
(I.E. round vs. square is the cross section.)
I used foundation sealer on the outside and nothing at all on the inside
and nothing ever leaked.
-Jack
|
148.224 | silicone for leaky snap-ties | NAC::S_JACOBS | Live Free and Prosper | Tue Nov 29 1988 20:29 | 5 |
| If you do end up with leaks, I found that silicone caulk does a
great job of sealing from the inside. They even sell it in a grey
shade to sort-of match the concrete.
Another REAL Steve
|
148.225 | notched pins help | CSSE::CACCIA | the REAL steve | Wed Nov 30 1988 11:59 | 6 |
|
one thing I did forget to mention was that our pins were notched.
RE.-.13 you may be another real Steve but are you Captain Belt Buckle?
|
148.226 | | VLNVAX::HEDERSTEDT | T.B.S. | Wed Nov 30 1988 14:43 | 2 |
| I was told that there is a special tool that will remove the pins.
You might be able to rent the tool at a Taler rental or such..
|
148.227 | depends on how you hit them | ADVAX::STEBULIS | | Thu Dec 01 1988 12:00 | 14 |
| I just went through this with my foundation. Thought of all kind
of schemes. Tried breaking them with a hammer by hitting the pin
from the top but that didn't work (only bent the pin), cutting them
off with a saw, etc. Then the concrete contractor stopped by one
day and I asked him for an easy way to break the pins off. He took
a hammer, one wack on the SIDE of the pin and it snapped right off.
The pins they used on my foundation were flattened 1/4" steel with
notches to hold the forms at various widths.
Steve
|
148.228 | Putting a sill on a new foundation? | TELALL::DEERY | | Wed Dec 07 1988 21:55 | 18 |
|
I've looked extensively through this file and I can't seem to find
anything on this.
I'm having a modular home delivered in January. I've got everything
all set except the sill on the foundation. I don't think this should
be to hard to do and I'd like to do it myself. Is there anyone in
this file that has ever put a sill on a foundation? I know I've
got to use pressure treated 2x6's but that's all I know. One more
thing, the house is a split entry ranch with a kneewall in the front.
I will appreciate any information that anyone can give me.
Thanks,
Bill
|
148.229 | piece of cake | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Dec 08 1988 00:10 | 12 |
| The way I did it was to first put down a sill sealer. This is actually a roll
of insulation 5-1/2" wide and around 1/2" thick. It sits between the 2X6 and
foundation to prevent drafts. On top of the pressure treated 2X6 I put a
second, non-pressure treated one. The only extra work to do is drill holes in
the pressure treated 2X6 to fit over the bolts which should be sticking up out
of the foundation.
Although I was told my many people you don't need to actually screw nuts over
the bolts (since you're only trying to prevent horizontal movement), I did it
anyway. Also, I suspect it may even be in the code, but I'm not sure.
-mark
|
148.230 | Mortar or sill sealer - use PT | FREDW::MATTHES | half a bubble off plumb | Thu Dec 08 1988 09:53 | 11 |
|
.1 has it right.
The only problem you may run into is the cement is not level enough
to get away with the 1\2" sill sealer. I used a layer of mortar
on top of the cement which takes up all the vairances of the wall.
This was on top of a dry stacked block wall that was then skim coated.
I suspect that a professionally poured foundation lends itself to
the sill sealer better. Either way works fine. Don't just put
the 2x6 on the foundation and think you are done.
|
148.231 | Check the ads in Fine Homebuilding | PALMER::PALMER | Finally on the level | Thu Dec 08 1988 11:28 | 6 |
| In _Fine Homebuilding_ there is a company that advertises
an EDPM gasket that fits between the cement and the sill. It
is probably similar to the material mentioned in .1. EDPM is
a rubbery material that has great resistance to environmental
breakdown.
=Ralph=
|
148.232 | Gaps in sill? | HIHOSS::HOSSFELD | | Thu Dec 08 1988 14:41 | 4 |
|
Also check the plans for the installing the house. Mine needed
gaps in the sill for the straps that are used to lift the house
onto the foundation.
|
148.233 | thanks | TELALL::DEERY | | Fri Dec 09 1988 01:02 | 11 |
|
thanks everyone,
I think I will use the method in .1. My foundation has metal straps
instead of bolts that just wrap around the sill and get nailed into
the sill. I'll be attempting this this weekend (if it doesn't snow)
and I'll let you know how I make out.
|
148.234 | Must have 2 sets of 2x6's for straps | PARITY::JOLLIMORE | | Fri Dec 09 1988 13:50 | 7 |
| You must remember to put two layers of 2x6's because as stated in
a earlier reply that is the only way to cut a notch in order to
get the crane straps out. Mine was notch in a "V" groove so the
notch could be put back in when the box was set down. The notch
was then chaulked before the exterior siding was put on.
Jeff
|
148.235 | I hope I am not too late.. | MRVAX::HEDERSTEDT | T.B.S. | Mon Dec 12 1988 13:30 | 4 |
| I also think that you might want a insect barrier to stop mother
nature's little friends!
Wayne
|
148.236 | | PAXVAX::NAYLOR | Mark E. Naylor | Mon Dec 12 1988 23:42 | 10 |
| re: .7
When I was getting the building permit for my garage, I asked
the inspector about a termite shield. He said it was not required
(Marlboro, MA) and said it should not be a problem if the top of
the foundation was the minimum 8" above grade. Seemed reasonable.
Mark
|
148.237 | | VLNVAX::HEDERSTEDT | T.B.S. | Tue Dec 13 1988 11:49 | 4 |
|
Well,The old safe than sorry is cheap insurance in this case. Just
an idea!
Wayne
|
148.238 | thesill is on! | PATOIS::DEERY | | Tue Dec 13 1988 21:33 | 13 |
|
Thanks for all the info. I've put the sill on and it was a piece
of cake. I did not need two sills because my house is not being put
on with a crane. It's being rolled on. The sill seal is really thin
I thought it would be some kind of rubberized gasket. My foundation
was poured with metal straps that wrap around the sill and get nailed
into it, so I didn't have any bolts to cut either.
thanks again.
p.s. what is the insect barrier, and is it to late to put on now
that the sill is on?
|
148.239 | Flood Plane Foundations | TOPDOC::AHERN | Dennis the Menace | Wed Mar 01 1989 14:43 | 50 |
| My family went before the Rockport Board of Appeals last night to
get permission to build a new, and somewhat different, house to
replace the one that burned down last June. (Note #2420).
The earlier structure had been a cottage on a cut-granite block
foundation with just an unheated crawl space. We would like to
rebuild with a concrete foundation, no cellar, but a heated crawl
space to keep the pipes from freezing and make the place habitable
in Winter.
The fly in the ointment seems to be that we are located in what
the Federal Guvmint has declared a Coastal Flood Plane Zone. This
means that the Town's insurance is in question if they allow us
to build there. We are told that we will have to build the place
on stilts or pilings to allow the ocean waves to wash through without
destroying the foundation.
Well, even though we are only 16' above sea level, if you saw the
place you'd think this a little bit silly. I'm familiar with places
like Scituate [Mass.] where every winter storm rolls the popple
stones under, around and through all those cottages that were allowed
to be built on the beach. But this is on solid ground. The house
has been there for well over a hundred years. Our family rode out
the '38 hurricane and all the hurricanes in the '50s with no more
than some salt spray on the windows. The only time we had any water
in the yard was during the blizzard of '78.
Unless the greenhouse effect raises the sea level a foot, I don't
think we are really in any danger, but the Law is the law. The
BofA suggested that they would be receptive to a waiver from the
Federal code if we submitted a foundation plan designed by a structural
engineer to withstand potential wave damage. They've already had
one other reconstructed house down on Bearskin Neck go through this
and get approval.
What I would like to know is:
Does anyone have any experience complying with the Federal Coastal
Flood Plane zoning requirements.
Has anyone ever had a foundation designed by a structural engineer?
How much are we talking for design? $1k, $2k or what?
Is it a lot more expensive to build?
Our fallback position may have to be a sonotube piling construction
with some sort of "breakaway" skirting to give the appearance of
a house that sits on the ground. I think that doesn't sound
particularly attractive and would tend to devalue the property.
|
148.240 | OTHER POSSIBILITIES | MLLAB::ANDERSON | | Wed Mar 01 1989 15:26 | 6 |
| Dennis
I live in Scituate [Mass] across the marsh from a lot of the houses
on stilts. There are other ways around building with stilts, but
you still end up living on the second floor. Give me a call at DTN
228-2343 if you want me to elaborate.
Gary
|
148.241 | Cracks in the foundation | FDCV06::JREGAN | | Fri Mar 24 1989 19:01 | 14 |
| If you were buying a house and during the inspection you noticed
a crack in the foundation which started at the top
and traveled to the bottom of the footing like a funnel (1/4 inch
at the sill to nothing over about 7 feet of foundation), would you
be concerned? The crack is noticable from outside and
sits smack dab in the center of an addition that is about 15-20
years old. Additions seems to be on some sort of fill.
Any info would be appreciated...
jr
|
148.242 | 2892 | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Fri Mar 24 1989 19:15 | 18 |
| This note has been temporarily write-locked pending approval of the author.
To the author: This subject is already under discussion in this file, under the
topics listed in the title. Please look at these notes; you may find that your
question is already answered, or you may find a note where your question would
be an appropriate continuation of the discussion. Note that since nearly
everyone uses NEXT UNSEEN to read notes, your question will get the same
exposure whether it is a response to a two-year-old note or it is its own new
note. These topics were found using the keyword directory (note 1111), and you
may find other notes relating to this subject by examining the directory
yourself.
We do, however, welcome new notes if they explore a specific aspect of a
problem that may be under general discussion. And this moderator has been
known to make mistakes. :^) So if after examining these notes, you wish to
continue the discussion here, send me mail.
Paul [Moderator]
|
148.243 | No responses | FDCV06::JREGAN | | Mon Mar 27 1989 12:33 | 14 |
| Note 2892 didn't have any responses to it either.
I have a friend that had a crack in their basement wall and before
DEC purchased it from them (they were relocated) they were required
to have it fixed. Evidently the dirt around the foundation was
dug out, the existing foundation was jacked up to close the
crack and another cement footing was poured. The whole thing cost
about $10k, so I'm told.
I've backed out of the house that had this problem but I'm still
interested.
jr
|
148.12 | Cost of sill replacment?? | WONDER::MAKRIANIS | Patty | Wed Jul 19 1989 14:01 | 11 |
|
I'm having someone come to my house tonight to give me an estimate
on replacing a sill. This person comes highly recommended, so I
have no qualms about using him. What I would like to know is what
I should expect to pay for a job like this. Only about 14 feet of
the sill on one side of the house needs replacing (so I think, he
may indicate otherwise). I would like a rough idea of what to expect
money wise, so when he gives his estimate I'll have an idea if it's
reasonable or not. Thanks for your help.
Patty
|
148.13 | A job I would not want again | AIMHI::WAGNER | | Thu Jul 20 1989 18:26 | 10 |
| This will depend on what is found while ripping out the old material. I
just finished doing this to my house (rot under the front and side door
due to lousy construction originally). It took me 3 weekends to do it
by myself. I had to replace 8 feet of plyood sheathing, siding, the
sill, threshhold, move concrete steps, slaughter 50,000 ants, etc. It
cost me about $250 in material and lots of labor since I was doing it
myself. Depending on what has to be done it could run anywhere from
$600 to $1500 as a rough guess( and don't be surprised if it is more).
Merle
|
148.14 | | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Thu Jul 20 1989 18:38 | 8 |
|
Merle's prices seem about right. The last time I helped out on a job
like this (~4 years ago), the price charged by a fully-insured
contractor varied from $70 to $100 per foot of sill. And there's some
kind of natural Law that says when you open things up to get a look at
the sill, there's always more damage than you thought there was.
JP
|
148.15 | What you see is a third of what you've got | KAYAK::GROSSO | | Fri Jul 21 1989 13:51 | 5 |
| re. 14:
That natural law is that the affected area is triple what is
visible. I read that in an old house book after I had observed the same
phenomenon on two porches.
|
148.16 | Here's what he said. | WONDER::MAKRIANIS | Patty | Fri Jul 21 1989 19:52 | 9 |
|
Well, the contractor came by and gave us an off the cuff estimate
of $500. That's for two men and a days work. We'll be getting the
written estimate in the mail the beginning of next week. I feel
comfortable with the estimate and the contractor so we're going
to go for it. Will let you know if anything else is uncovered (God
I hope not!!)
Patty
|
148.118 | Drainage around garage | GOSOX::RYAN | DECwindows Mail | Mon Aug 21 1989 13:51 | 32 |
| This seems like the closest note...
Our garage is sided with aluminum on two sides (the front and side
towards our lawn) and retains the former wood siding on the other
two sides (the back and the side towards our next-door neighbor).
The interesting thing :-( is the grade of the land - on the sides
with aluminum siding, there are a few inches of concrete between the
ground and the bottom of the siding. On the neighbor's side and
partway along the back, the ground actually was partly covering
the bottom (wood) clapboard. Having the brush along the side removed
revealed the extent of the problem, so yesterday I dug a trench
along the side and removed the bottom clapboard (what didn't just
crumble away). There's a fair amount of rot in the wood behind,
but that's not my question (my father-in-law's a carpenter, he'll
take a look at it and tell us how bad it is). I'm interested
in what to do to keep the dirt and moisture away.
Since only a foot of land on that side of the garage is ours,
significant grading is out of the question. Is filling the trench
with crushed stone going to be good enouch? Wouldn't runoff fill
it in with dirt before long? Would lining it with plastic on the
bottom and pressure-treated wood alond the side prevent this?
There is a bit of a slope going from the back of the garage towards
the front, where the driveway is not very well graded (if there's
a lot of water it'll collect there, and perhaps even run into the
garage), so I'd prefer to let the water seep into the ground where
it falls while still keeping the stone "clean". How deep should I
dig the trench, and how much space should I leave between the top
of the stone and the bottom of the wood (the sill) of the garage?
How do I estimate how much stone to get to fill the trench?
Mike
|
148.119 | Update... | GOSOX::RYAN | DECwindows Mail | Thu Aug 31 1989 16:05 | 8 |
| Guess it's not an interesting problem... Anyway, my plan is to
start at the driveway end and dig it out a couple of inches below
the level of the driveway their, slope it slightly towards the
back of the garage, make a short wall of pressure-treated wood
to keep the neighbors yard from filling it in, and fill it with
gravel to about the level of the driveway.
Mike
|
148.158 | | SALEM::DACUNHA | | Wed Oct 18 1989 17:37 | 31 |
148.385 | Buckling Cellar Wall | BTOVT::MORRIS_K | | Sat Oct 28 1989 23:41 | 38 |
| A friend of mine has a difficult problem. His house foundation wall
next to an inground, soft sided pool is cracking badly and bowing in.
He wants to fix the problem/stop the problem without spending humongous
amounts of money and or completely destroying/ripping up all the work
around the pool and the house.
Here is a diagram of the situation
________ block wall that is buckling
|
V |------Decking
___ | ______pool apron
| | V | _____pool
| |___________ V |
| | |---- V
buckling<------- | |................|vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv|
| | ^ ; ;
| | | ;<-- ;
| | | ; | ;
---------------- Sandy soil |
soft liner
He has been advised to install a retaining wall inside the cellar
against the buckling block wall. The distance between the wall and the
pool is approximately 12 feet. The block wall is about 40 feet long
with about 30 feet cracked. Apparently the softsided, inground pool
is applying pressure against the soil, causing the wall to buckle.
The solution seems to be a bandaid rather than a permanent fix.
By-the-way if the pool is drained for any length of time (greater than
a day, the sides begin to cave in).
Any ideas on how to correct the situation? The decking can be removed
because it is rotting, but the owner really does not want to remove the
pool.
Thanks in advance.
Kent
|
148.386 | *OUCH* | DCSVAX::COTE | No, Kelly. I said *wits*... | Sun Oct 29 1989 12:52 | 5 |
| With all due respect to your friend, this note just cheered me up. You
see, I'm sitting here with a leaking hot water tank that, after reading
.0, now seems like an incredibly minor annoyance.
Edd
|
148.387 | What's a retaining wall in this case? | TOOK::SWIST | Jim Swist LKG2-2/T2 DTN 226-7102 | Mon Oct 30 1989 12:54 | 10 |
| What do you mean by "retaining wall"? Anything built parallel to the
existing wall won't work no matter how strong you build it - the
pressure of that amount of water is formidable. What would be much
better is bracing erected PERPENDICULAR to the existing wall -
something forming a triangle between the basement floor and wall would
work best.
This of course creates a monstrosity in the basement which may of may
not be to the owner's liking, depending on the usage of the area. But
it's cheaper that redoing everything.
|
148.388 | check out NEW ENGLAND BUILDER | DECSIM::DEMBA | | Tue Oct 31 1989 11:38 | 17 |
| A couple of articles from the magazine the "NEW ENGLAND BUILDER"
may help. One article describes the problem you are having
due to expansive soils like clay on unreinforced block walls over
a height of four feet and the second in a later edition describes
repairs to failed foundations.
The one article said, "If the amount of deflection is one-third
the thickness of the wall, then part of the wall is in tension,
and the wall is structurally unstable". Check the amount of deflection
with a straightedge.
The other article(s) describes repairs in terms of replacing that
wall with a reinforced poured concrete wall.
Steve
PS: let me know if you would like copies of the articles.
|
148.389 | Copies Of Article | PCOJCT::BAIO | | Tue Oct 31 1989 17:30 | 8 |
| Steve
I have a block foundation wall that buckled and would like a
copy of the articles you mentioned.
Send to: Joe Baio NYO
Thanks
|
148.390 | We just finished fixing a buckled foundation | AKOLD1::KUMOREK | | Thu Nov 02 1989 16:06 | 19 |
| We have a block foundation that is buckled (3 - 3 1/2"). We heard all sorts of
reasons for this buckling ranging from 'it was built that way' to ground
pressure.
We had a structural engineer (Gino Cosimini, Natick, MA - there is a note on him
somewhere in this conference) inspect it and determine what kind of pressure it
was actually under now. He showed us all kinds of calculations on how he
determined our pressure and showed us building code limits. He then
presented us with a few different solutions and formally designed the solution
of our choice. We happened to choose a retaining wall.
Having a professional design is expensive ($60 per hour). In our case we felt
is was worth it. It depends on how confident you feel about your structural
knowledge and how much of a chance you want to take on the foundation of your
house!
Good luck!
|
148.135 | "Oh, Gawd, another neophyte..." | LYCEUM::CURTIS | Dick "Aristotle" Curtis | Fri Mar 16 1990 14:40 | 9 |
| re silicone cement-patching substance: (.8, .9 in particular)
Did you remove the washers from the pins first? (I suspect that it's
impossible to seal well without, but haven't actually tried this yet).
And do you do this before or after applying sealant to the wall?
(I'm guessing "before", but would prefer to know why.)
Dick
|
148.136 | Another method | VINO::DZIEDZIC | | Fri Mar 16 1990 15:56 | 5 |
| The system used in our house to patch the tie rod holes was
small wedge-shaped pieces of some plastic (nylon?) material
that were driven into the wall (from the outside) after the
tie rods were removed. Seems to work fairly well; I've never
seen any leakage past the wedges.
|
148.137 | WoW! Im still here! | CHART::CBUSKY | | Fri Mar 16 1990 17:25 | 30 |
| > Did you remove the washers from the pins first? (I suspect that it's
> impossible to seal well without, but haven't actually tried this yet).
My pins were the "newer" square snap-off ties that don't use washers.
When they snap-off properly they are sightly recessed (1/4") below the
surface of the cement. This forms a nice little crater that can be
filled with the Silicon caulk.
> And do you do this before or after applying sealant to the wall?
> (I'm guessing "before", but would prefer to know why.)
Are you refering to sealing the outside of a new foundation? What I
did was patch all of the ties on the outside with regular tar patching
cement and then applied the sealant. I hadn't thought of or considered
the use of silicon at this time. I used the silicon later on the
inside for a dozen or so ties that leaked after the everything was
backfilled.
I also used the silcon to caulk a floor to ceiling crack that appeared
in one of the cement walls and leaked sligthly. I believe the crack is
an expanion crack due to the length of the wall, 44' long and
straight. The silicon filled and stuck to the crack very well. I did
chip the crack open to be about 1/2" wide and 1" deep, cleaned it,
washed it and let it dry before completely filling it with silicon.
I believe that a hard patching compound like hydrolic cement would
crack as the wall continued to expand and contract. The silicon stays
firmly attached to both sides of the crack.
Charly
|
148.138 | Questions regarding *interior* sealing efforts | LYCEUM::CURTIS | Dick "Aristotle" Curtis | Sat Mar 17 1990 01:56 | 25 |
| Charly (.17 & friends),
My assignment has ties that look round, but they were run through a
washer on the inside and then bent back & forth until they broke off.
(I do have one that wasn't broken; it appears to be of circular cross-
section, but with a flattened portion near the end for gripping.
A fair number have washers present; a fair number don't, and some of
the latter have nice little craters about the diameter of a quarter or
a trifle bigger, with depths going as much as a half-inch.
These are all on the inside: I'm not going to dig up the ground
outside without compelling reason.
At any rate, my intent was to use silicon to seal these, as I've
noticed that 3 or 4 have little trails of rust, suggesting that they
have let water in at some time (although no one has observed this
in the past 6 months). I suspect that this should be done before
applying the Thompson's Water Seal, thinking that the silicon would
adhere better -- but this is a semi-educated guess on my part.
So, which should come first: sealing pins & cracks with silicon
caulking, or applying 2 coats of Thompson's Water Seal?
Dick
|
148.139 | De-rusting? | BASBAL::FALKOF | | Mon Mar 19 1990 11:00 | 4 |
| I understand there is a chemical which can be purchased that changes
rust into an inert chemical, effectively stopping rust. I have heard of
it being used for auto rust/rot. Could something like this be applied
to the rusted things before applying the caulk?
|
148.140 | | CHART::CBUSKY | | Mon Mar 19 1990 12:03 | 8 |
| I would do the silcon caulking first, only because it's been proven to
work and stick to the concrete in another application (mine). Then
you can go over the whole wall with the Thomson's water seal if you wish.
If you were going to be painting the wall, then you would have a new
issue, how (well) would the paint stick to the silicon.
Charly
|
148.141 | | LYCEUM::CURTIS | Dick "Aristotle" Curtis | Tue Mar 20 1990 12:12 | 26 |
| .19:
Well, I'm planning to put a wall up there (2-bys, insulation, sheet
rock, all that stuff); I'm not sure that rusting is a problem by
itself, but seeing what looked like a dried up dribble of rusty water
suggested to me that water may have entered there, at some time in the
past (while the foundation was open to the weather, if I'm lucky -- but
I don't plan on that!)
.20:
OK, that sounds good. The Thompson's will probably just bead up on the
caulking and take a long time to dry; I think I can live with that. I
had wondered if there was any advantage (with respect to waterproofing)
to sealing the cement under the caulk, and whether the sealer would
affect the caulk's adhesion.
I think that I'll aim for caulking the pins tomorrow night or Thursday
night, and (if it's not damp) starting to apply the Thompson's on
Saturday. That will take some time, because the label states that
it requires a minimum of 48 hours between coats -- and thanks to the
pile of gear in the cellar, I can't do it all in one piece. (Cellar is
the only place I can put several things, such as a 40" rack suitable
for stuff like PDP-11s.)
Dick
|
148.63 | how to dig holes to pour everything at once? | WILARD::BARANSKI | Neomaniac on the loose! | Tue May 15 1990 19:38 | 22 |
| I want to build a 24x36 post & beam gambrel barn...
Standard foundation would be a 8 inch think foundation wall 42 inches deep to
the base of 8 inch thick 16 inch wide footings. An alternative would be 12 inch
think walls 42 inches down with no footings, but that's a lot more concrete. No
rebar required. So says the Norwich Ct building inspector.
What I'd like to do is figure out a way to dig slit trenches that are just the
right size for the footing and foundation wall. That way no forms are needed,
and I can pour the footings, the wall, and the concrete slab floor all at the
same time. The hard part is digging the 16 inch wide space at the bottom of the
8 inch wide 42 inch deep hole, right? :-) I figure there must be a way to scrap
the sides of the bottom 4 inchs wider on each side... got any ideas?
I'd like to use some rebar, maybe two at the top, two at the base, and a
couple of loops around them where the posts will be.
concrete seems to run about 50$ a cubic yard. Any ideas how much rebar will
run? I keep seeing these huge piles of rebar where they're working on all
the roads in CT... they'd never miss a few ... :-}
Jim.
|
148.64 | A lot of work... good luck.. | OPUS::CLEMENCE | | Wed May 16 1990 05:11 | 27 |
| RE: .20
Unless your ground is clay or peatmoss; the walls will cave in
before you get very far...... and if you somehow hold back the dirt while
digging you could very likely have a cavein during the pour.....
The cost of a backhoe to excavate is around $50 hour... about a
3-4 hour job....
In order to dig a trench that skinny you could use a trench
digger. Don't know how much they cost.... and several passes would be required.
(they dig a 2-3 inch wide trench)
So your other option is dig by hand.... Do you really want to do
that???
Another problem.... Does the building inspector think digging
this hole and pouring going to be ok?? Remember the inspector has to
pass this foundation.....
Don't know the going price on rebar.
Bill
P.S. Let us know how you do.... I believe my foundation very similar in size
to yours is going to cost me no more than $4K.....
|
148.65 | Use pillars? | CADSE::ENGELHARDT | | Wed May 16 1990 12:15 | 6 |
| >I want to build a 24x36 post & beam gambrel barn...
Couldn't you just put a pillar under each post?
RE: re-bar - probably $.40 - .50 per pound, depending upon quantity.
1/2" is .67#/ft, 5/8 is 1.04. Call a masonry supply company.
|
148.66 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed May 16 1990 13:37 | 6 |
| Ditto on .22; use Sonotubes. You'd need a sizable footing for each, so
you'd end up digging good-sized holes to set the tubes in, but you'd
use a *lot* less concrete. Why do you think you need a full wall
foundation? I assume you're building a floor in the barn. If not,
you may want the full foundation so the wind doesn't blow under
the walls.
|
148.67 | working around an old foundation? | MCDONL::BARANSKI | Neomaniac on the loose! | Wed May 16 1990 15:19 | 41 |
| Well, I probably *could* get away with Sonotubes, but the BI says Sonotubes are
for raised structures or buildings without floors. I at least eventually want
to have a concrete floor. I also want this to last, and the barn is at the edge
of a top of a slope, so I think a foundation wall is a good idea.
perimeter of a 24x36 barn is 120 ft. a 42x8 foundation wall has a 336 si cross
section. a 16x8 footing has a 128 is cross section. Total cross section 464
si or 3.2 sf. Total volume is 387 cf or 14.5 cy. At $50 a cy the concrete
will cost $750 with no forms and no rebar.
Hmmm... a 12 inch wide wall no footing would be 504 si or 3.5 sf; 420 cf
or 15.5 cy. Big Fat Hairy Deal. This makes digging the footings a moot
point; I'm not going to sweat it over $50.
A 24x36 floor would be 864 sf. A 4 inch thickness is standard, which is 287 cf
or 10.6 cy, or $550. 6 inches would be better at 432 cf or 16 cy and $750.
Plus 4 inches of gravel and 4 inches of sand and wire mesh if you are inclined.
I'd be inclined to skip the gravel & sand on ground that is pretty well sand
and stones anyway. I'd like to have the wire mesh though.
The floor is complicated by the fact that there is currently a falling down
barn occupying the space I need to build the barn in. I'm slowly dismantling
the barn, and using the wood that is not rotted out to build a couple of
12x12 sheds to store the stuff that is in the barn in.
The Current Barn mostly has a concrete floor on unknown age. It has a few
cracks and little tilting, but not much. Mostly it was poured at different
levels to begin with. The foundation that is there is several differing styles
of old concrete, or rocks. I plan on digging the foundation for the new barn
just outside three sides and just inside the forth side to minimize having to
dig up the old foundation; I imagine that would be a *lot* of work. I'd like to
have to mess with the old concrete and foundation as little as possible, and
just pour over the old floor, and around the old foundation.
What do you think?
Barn is a euphamism. It's going to be a workshop. I want to insulate it,
and eventually make it more or less living/work space. But if I construct
it as a barn, there are a lot less constraints.
Ji.
|
148.142 | hydraulic cement still the best
| MRBASS::BPUISHYS | Bob Puishys | Thu Jun 28 1990 14:08 | 5 |
| My foundation was just poured and I have to break the pins and do the
tar. Is HYDRAULIC cement still the best product to use to fill the pins
holes? Also what about this tar sh*t.
Bob Puishys
|
148.143 | Wrap it up! | BCSE::WEIER | | Thu Jun 28 1990 14:31 | 8 |
| If you use a 'foundation-wrap' (plastic or something), instead of the
tar, your basement will stay drier. I don't know what the cost
comparison is, but figure the additional cost of plastic (I assume it's
more), versus the cost of running a dehumdifier all summer - forever -,
as well as potential 'moisture damage' to things stored in the
basement.
pw
|
148.244 | LEGAL ? HOUSE FOUNDATIONS WITHOUT FOOTINGS? | LEZAH::FLESSA | | Sun Dec 02 1990 20:11 | 42 |
|
Could someone please help me with an answer to a question that
I have about foundations that I have not see answered directly.
I am seriously considering buying a new home in Franklin, MA.
The structure is a 36 x 24 Colonial.
Here is the question:
Is is Mass. State Code (and thereby also town code) that
all concrete foundation structures MUST be built upon footings?
I have just discovered that the builder is NOT using footings
(AT ALL!) to sit the 8 inch wall upon.
The builder is setting the concrete walls (don't appear to be steel
rod reinforced) upon stone (2-3 inch diameter)
The walls are NOT on Footings, I have had this fact witnessed by my
brother who is a N.H. huse builder.
The earth around the foundation seems to be a mixture of 75% sandy,
25% clay.
The builder is not installing any footing drainage with the foundation
(needless to say, but another fact to note.)
IS BUILDING A 36 X 24 COLONIAL STRUCTURE IN MASS WITHOUT ANY FOOTINGS
LEGAL?
IS IT ADVISEABLE?
HAS ANYONE HAD EXPERIENCE WITH OR KNOW OF BUILDERS IN MASSACHUSETTS
BUILDING 2 STORY COLONIALS WITH FOUNDATION WALLS THAT HAVE NO
FOOTINGS ??
thanks for your help in advance.
Ted
|
148.245 | building inspector before signing anything! | SENIOR::HAMBURGER | Whittlers chip away at life | Mon Dec 03 1990 11:28 | 41 |
| -< LEGAL ? HOUSE FOUNDATIONS WITHOUT FOOTINGS? >-
IS BUILDING A 36 X 24 COLONIAL STRUCTURE IN MASS WITHOUT ANY FOOTINGS
LEGAL?
>>>>It doesn't sound that way, but your local building inspector is the
person to ask. He should be able to show you in the building code where it
allows this practice. (I wouldn't just take his word for it.)
IS IT ADVISEABLE?
>>>>That is a whole 'nother story....I wouldn't do it.
HAS ANYONE HAD EXPERIENCE WITH OR KNOW OF BUILDERS IN MASSACHUSETTS
BUILDING 2 STORY COLONIALS WITH FOUNDATION WALLS THAT HAVE NO
FOOTINGS ??
>>>Not personally, and I worked with a building inspector for about 8
months. Foundations should be below frost line (eg, 4' deep in these parts)
with a footer poured onto undisturbed soil. The footer may/may not need a
form to create it, but should have a keyway set in the top. Watch the nifty
graphics.....this is a side view.
-------------- --------------
| | top of soil
| 4' deep |
| |
| |
|___ ____| This is the top of the footer. The u shaped
| | channel is usually created by laying an oiled
----- 2x4 into the wet cement, then removing it later.
This would give a good key to start pouring or
building on top of.
Best bet.....talk to the local building inspector. He can explain the
code. If in doubt about his answer (Like, yeh, I approved it 'cause my
brother in law built it that way) then talk to the main office in Boston on
Warburton Place (I think). They have regional inspectors who can anser
questions.
Vic H
|
148.246 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Dec 03 1990 12:48 | 7 |
| I think these days they are pouring foundation walls without footings.
I guess they've found that given the loads involved, the footings
aren't needed.
Or so they claim. Check with the building inspector, he can tell you
for sure. It may depend a lot on what the soil is. For some types
of soil you probably still need footings.
|
148.247 | it depends upon soil & drainage | TRACTR::BARNES | SUMMER = NEWFOUND DAZE PHASE | Mon Dec 03 1990 14:19 | 11 |
|
The building inspector used to be able to tell you "yes" or "no" on the
footings requirement based upon his timely inspection of the EXCAVATION.
If the soil was all gravel, and drainage was good, the inspector had the
authority to waive the need for footings. This was 1976, Lexington, MA,
construction.
I would recommend 10" concrete walls, and backfill of crushed stone,
full-depth x 24".
|
148.248 | Put a drain in | MACROW::MATTHES | half a bubble off plumb | Tue Dec 04 1990 08:56 | 18 |
| You say it's a 36 x 24 colonial - single story ??
The reason I ask is that I know of some folks who would like to 'raise
the roof' i.e. add a second story. They can't due to inadequate
foundations. If this IS only a single story, the foundation may be
adequate, but limits any growth.
It reaaly comes down to soil conditions as to whether or not a footing
is required. Certainly a footing is more solid. It may not be
necessary.
Again, depending on soil conditions, drains may not be required.
However, it is VERY rare that they are not required. It's usually the
builder saving a buck and it's much more expensive and difficult to add
it later. I might forgoe the footing, but I'd beat up a builder to put
the drain in.
my $.02
|
148.249 | May not need footings | MAY10::STOJDA | | Tue Dec 04 1990 15:12 | 11 |
| I went through this recently. What my town inspector said was I did
not need footings since I was having a 10" foundation wall done (I put
the footings in anyway). He said that if I went with an 8" wall, I
would need the footings. I agree with the others, check with your
local inspector.
- Mike
BTW, mine is a 2-1/2 story house
|
148.347 | Building house on ledge | TALLIS::DARCY | | Fri Jan 11 1991 04:30 | 22 |
|
I am looking at purchasing a piece of land that is composed of
ALL ledge which goes down at least 15 feet. Is it possible to
simply anchor the foundation walls on top of the ledge with
reinforcing bars as described in -.1?
Do I need to construct footings on the ledge, or can I place the
walls directly on the ledge? How deep should the crawl space
be between the ledge and the first floor? Is there any reason
to put a floor in the foundation? Do the walls have to be any
thicker than normal for this type of design?
The lot is in Massachusetts and is basically flat in topology.
I would be building a 2 and 1/2 story house on this lot. The
house would be about 2700 sq. ft in footprint.
Are there any other factors I should be aware of with this
type of foundation design, i.e. water seepage ledge and foundation,
type of concrete to use to interface between ledge and foundation, etc.
Any help + suggestions appreciated,
-g.a.
|
148.348 | For resale, if nothing else | WUMBCK::FOX | | Fri Jan 11 1991 12:46 | 7 |
| re .-1
Can't speak for your primary questions, but I would put some good
ventilation in the crawl space, and living areas. Building over
ledge would most likely increase your likelyhood of a high radon
count.
John
|
148.349 | | BTOVT::MORRIS_K | July 52 degree isotherm | Fri Jan 11 1991 18:12 | 21 |
|
While not being a building inspector, architect or engineer, it would
seem to me that a footing would not be necessary depending on the
following:
1. The foundation rests on the ledge.
2. The ledge is indeed 15' thick.
3. The ledge is of some substantial material.
If the above applies, then I would think that the ledge becomes the
footing. I would clearly anchor the foundation to the ledge. If
radon is a problem or you suspect it to be a problem, then you should
provide a solution such as sealing it off and providing ventilation.
If you are going to have crawl space, I would treat it like other
crawl spaces in the area. I would at the least cover it with plastic
and vent it to keep the moisture level down.
|
148.350 | | STROKR::DEHAHN | No time for moderation | Fri Jan 11 1991 18:34 | 5 |
|
What about water and septic?
CdH
|
148.351 | | TALLIS::DARCY | | Mon Jan 14 1991 14:19 | 4 |
| Yes a trench will have to be blasted for water, sewerage and
utilities. The going rate for blasting is approx. $60 per cubic
yard. Building an entire basement though would be prohibitive -
in the $40-50K range.
|
148.352 | Response to the question in the title | CLOSET::DUM::T_PARMENTER | Hey Baby Que Paso | Mon Jan 14 1991 15:09 | 5 |
| According to my book of New England geography and geology, you can find
a ledge by poking a hole in the ground almost anywhere in New England. A
close paraphrase of the author's statement: "What you see in cuts along
expressways is an accurate cross-section of the average land in New England,
six to twelve feet of dirt on top of 10 to 60 to ? feet of ledge."
|
148.353 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Jan 14 1991 15:15 | 3 |
| Why do you think they call New Hampshire "The Granite State"? :-)
Steve
|
148.354 | My experience with Ledge | SMURF::COHEN | | Mon Jan 14 1991 15:44 | 12 |
| We had lots of ledge on our lot and had to blast the complete foundation
and a piece for the driveway. The foundation was 28x48 with 16x24 ell.
It costs us about $3500 in blasting. That was 2 years ago.
Ledge does cost more to excavate and potentially more for a septic system.
We did have a radon problem but if you plan ahead it wont be expensive
to get rid of it. Anyhow it cost about $19,000 for the excavation, septic,
and driveway. It cost about $8000 for the concrete (footings, walls, and
floor). BTW some of the footings were poured directly onto the ledge and
were varying in thickness because of the slope of the ledge.
Anyway it should cost a lot less than $40-50k to get a basement out of ledge.
-Larry
|
148.355 | to haul or not? | OASS::BURDEN_D | He's no fun, he fell right over | Mon Jan 14 1991 22:44 | 10 |
| My parents built a house in Vermont and had to blast into ledge for the
basement. The house is situated on the side of a hill, in the middle of 20
or so acres. They just kind of blasted the rock out and down. No need to
haul the stuff away. If you hade to contain the blasting and get rid of the
rock, that would, of course, increase costs.
It's still fun looking up at the trees around the house and finding scars
on the bark from the rocks, 40 to 50 feet up!
Dave
|
148.356 | What's the best type of ledge for building on? | TALLIS::DARCY | | Tue Jan 15 1991 19:03 | 6 |
| What type of ledge is the best for supporting a house (Granite?),
and which would be the worst (Slate?).
Any rock experts out there? :v)
g.a.
|
148.357 | Two I woulden't choose... | CSC32::GORTMAKER | Alas, babylon... | Wed Jan 16 1991 03:39 | 6 |
| re-.1
Schist is just like it sounds for supporting a house. The decayed
granite out here in CO is about as bad.
-j
|
148.358 | Limestone! | XK120::SHURSKY | Jaguar enthusiast. | Wed Jan 16 1991 11:54 | 23 |
| Now where did I leave my Civil Engineering hat? I used to have one here
someplace.
Limestone is very bad for siting buildings. When you do the engineering survey
one place will be solid rock and next to it will be a cavern (which could be
under what appears to be solid rock). You could come home, walk up your front
steps and into a sinkhole. Ocassionally a sinkhole consumes a parking lot (or I
saw pictures of a new car lot) in Florida.
Also I would think any rock that is layered or has a predisposition to cracking
in a certain direction and that direction is aimed down hill.
/\
/ \ Great graphics abilities there but I think you get the
\ \ / \ idea. I missed a career in chalet design.
\ \/ \
\ \-------\ I am sure there are others.
\ \ |
\ \ | Stan
\ \ |
\ \ |
\ \ |
\ \|
\ \
|
148.250 | A foundation without a house??? | MEIS::TOWNSEND | Erik S. Townsend (DTN) 247-2436 | Tue Feb 26 1991 16:29 | 42 |
|
Disclaimer: I looked in Note 1111 but couldn't find anything about this.
I own some oceanfront property in Maine. Been in the family for
years. It has a little (12x24) cabin on it now. I installed a well and
septic system designed for a 3-bdrm house a couple years ago. The idea
was to get the septic and water in place to support the future "dream
house" which I can't afford to build.
A problem is that the ideal house site is just over the current
minimum setback from the ocean, but everyone expects forthcoming legislation
to increase that minimum setback, making my site unbuildable :-(. I can't
afford to build a house on it.
I've been considering (for other reasons) building a 12x16 shed/
garage which I figure I could build for less than $2000.
It occurred to me that for not a hell of a lot more money, I might
be able to pour a foundation on the house site, then literally cap it off.
Something like a deck on top of the foundation and no house until I have the
money. My understanding of the laws is that this would forever assure
my ability to build the house. It could also provide the storage area
I need in the mean time.
I'm thinking I could bring the water, electric, and sewage connections
into the basement. An electrical panel with basically only one breaker
installed would service the existing cabin. I'd move the pressure tank
for the well water into the new "basement" and also feed the cabin with
it. Everything could be shut off/pumped dry for the winter, but the inside
of the foundation would be exposed to winter temps. (problem?)
Am I insane? Has anyone ever heard of this being done? I'm
envisioning something like a 20x40 foundation with some kind of waterproof
deck or maybe even a ground level roof on it. It would be 3 - 5 yrs minimum
before I could afford to pull off the deck and frame a house.
Does this make any sense whatsoever? All comments welcome.
Thanks...
Erik
|
148.251 | Get there first | CIMNET::MOCCIA | | Tue Feb 26 1991 17:26 | 16 |
| Can't you get your site plan and building permit before the proposed
legislation is enacted, and thus be grandfathered? This of course
assumes that the new setback regulations are primarily administrative
convenience and would not have any significant effect on the local
environment.
Another alternative is to "renovate" the shed. I've seen a four
bedroom house "renovated" out of a collapsed garage. Different set
of rules.
Since your well and septic system are already in place, the property
has obviously been found suitable for residential occupancy. Head
'em off at the pass.
pbm
|
148.252 | Yeah, but... | MEIS::TOWNSEND | Erik S. Townsend (DTN) 247-2436 | Tue Feb 26 1991 17:48 | 19 |
| re .1
Yeah, the idea of getting the permit crossed my mind too. I have
heard that because others have that idea, they put restrictions in that
say the permit is void if construction doesn't _begin_ within one year
after the permit date. I figured that putting the foundation in ought
to assure my building rights basically forever. (FWIW, everyone in the
area including the code enforcement guy seems to think the extra setback
is overkill - there is not real environmental imact)
More to the point, the shed wouldn't be needed once the house
got built. It seemed to almost make economic sense to build the shed
underground with the intent of building a house on it some day.
Does anyone know if the exposure to cold for several years would
present a problem? I'mm assuming an easy way could be found to build a
weatherproof "roof" surface.
Erik
|
148.253 | Supposedly common | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Feb 26 1991 18:38 | 4 |
| There was a fatal fire somewhere in New Hampshire several months ago.
A family was living in a roofed foundation, presumably because they
couldn't afford to build the rest of the house. An article in the
Globe claimed that there were lots of these around.
|
148.254 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Feb 27 1991 11:37 | 7 |
| Your place is in Maine and you've never seen cellar-hole houses?!
In Maine, they're all over the place if you get off the main roads.
A well-established tradition.
Now, zoning/building codes may have tightened up in the past few
years, especially along the coast where stricter codes will affect
only the "summer people" and not interfere with the natives ;-)
but I expect you'll be able to do it.
|
148.255 | Heat is the problem | MEIS::TOWNSEND | Erik S. Townsend (DTN) 247-2436 | Wed Feb 27 1991 11:40 | 11 |
| I found a complete answer which I thought I'd drop in here for
anyone interested.
According to the builder I talked to, once the foundation is in
it must be heated each winter.
The advice was build the shed for now, and when ready to build the
house, put it on piers with a very small foundation so that winter costs
will be minimal in the future.
Erik
|
148.256 | | VMSDEV::PAULKM::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Wed Feb 27 1991 16:22 | 18 |
| You don't necessarily need to heat it, but you do need to provide some method of
keeping the ground under the footings from freezing. Frost line is probably
about 4 feet down, and when the foundation is backfilled around it, the footings
are more than 4 feet below the surface. In places where the ground surface
comes down closer than 4 feet to the normal footings, a frost wall is usually
used, which puts the footings in that area lower than the rest of the cellar.
The problem is that when you don't heat the cellar, the footings are only about
a foot below ground surface, and it can freeze underneath, heaving the walls.
This won't necessarily happen all at once or at all, depending largely on the
soil type and drainage. Our foundation was exposed for one winter with no
problems.
What you need to do is provide some form of insulation for the winter. I've
heard of people putting a couple of feet of loose hay in a foundation and
covering it with a tarp to keep the footings from freezing.
Paul
|
148.257 | | MOOV02::S_JOHNSON | That's Craw! Not Craw!...Craw!!! | Wed Feb 27 1991 16:48 | 19 |
|
>The problem is that when you don't heat the cellar, the footings are only about
>a foot below ground surface, and it can freeze underneath, heaving the walls.
>This won't necessarily happen all at once or at all, depending largely on the
>soil type and drainage. Our foundation was exposed for one winter with no
>problems.
Could this also cause a newly poured foundation to develop vertical cracks?
We're looking at a partially constructed house, that has been vacant for over
a year. The concrete floor in the cellar has not been poured. (I read the
note on cracked foundations.) This is a case where the inside of the
cellar would have been as cold as the outside temperature. The house is built
on a grade, with a tri-level foundation (i.e., it drops down about 2/3 of the
way back to about 1/2 level, then drops very low in the back, to accomodate
doors)
(The exterior/interior walls and roof are up, with rough wiring,
plumbing, and drywall done. No heating system (although rough plumbing in
for that.)
|
148.258 | Best Place to Start is at Your Town Hall | MARX::SULLIVAN | We have met the enemy, and they is us! | Wed Feb 27 1991 17:35 | 12 |
| If you go to Maine or NH, I'm suprised you haven't seen this before. There
are "foundation homes" all over the place.
You would have to investigate the building requirements in your town. Each one
is different. You are right. They usually have a time limit on the permits.
You may also want to look into if they have a time limit on completion also.
Overall, I think you plan could be done. Certainly better to try than to lose
the chance for a home on the coast of Maine. I'D LOVE ONE!
Mark
|
148.259 | better check your position -- big bucks are involved | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Fri Mar 01 1991 20:21 | 18 |
| Something else to consider -- the day the zoning changes may not be the
day that you lose the right to build on your lot. I'm unfamiliar with
this area of land law (and even if I was, it may not apply in your area),
but you may have a certain period of time to "object" to a zoning change
that affects your ability to use your property. I don't know whether
the result (if you win) would be to let you build or force the state to
reimburse you for what is in effect a land taking. Think about how much
you will eventually spend on that house and then go and invest 1% of it
on a lawyer to make sure of your position -- not to mention checking
whether pouring a foundation *really* guarantees your right to build later.
But before contacting a lawyer, talk to the building inspector and other
relevant officials in town. It might be different when summer people talk
to the natives in Maine, but I've often found that one can get a lot more
flexibility out of officials by *asking* instead of *telling*.
Luck,
Larry
|
148.391 | Foundation bowed, house moving! | WMOIS::BEAN | You can lead a horse to water, but... | Tue Mar 12 1991 18:02 | 39 |
|
My wife bought an old house about 2 1/2 years ago that apparently
had structural damage/imperfections on one side wall of the foundation.
The house is 130+ years old and is a four family Victorian, 2 1/2
stories high. It's a BIG house.
The front and one side of the foundation was built with huge granite
stones and is very stable. The original back wall is now an interior
wall as at some point an addition was built off the back of the house.
It is made of red mortared brick, the same kind found to build
chimneys. The remaining side wall, (the damaged one), is also made
of the red brick, believed to be two deep.
This wall has been steadily bowing inward for the last two years and
no pattern has been noticed whether it takes place after heavy rains
snowfall, etc. The limestone/mortar used is all dried up and is
easily removed with the brush of your finger.
We had a general contractor come in and brace the wall with 2X6's from
the floor to the wall, with plywood sheets against the wall. This
appeared to help, but the house is still moving. Yes, moving!!
The previous owner had installed lally columns here and there to help
support the house, and we had the back wall of the house jacked up
about 1/2 " with temporary beams and lally columns to help take some
of the pressure off the side wall. (at a contractors advice)
We've had estimates of $14k - $20k to replace the side wall and a
portion of the back wall, but can't realistically afford that kind
of money yet for those kind of repairs.
This is sort of a plea for help, but have we exhausted all our avenues
for short term repair of the wall? Any suggestions? We can't very
well sell the house in it's present condition, obviously.
Any advice is welcome, short of putting my head between my knees and...
Tom
|
148.392 | Concrete I Beams ? re: OHJ Mar-Apr 91 | AHIKER::EARLY | Bob Early T&N EIC /US-EIS | Wed Mar 13 1991 12:51 | 25 |
| > This wall has been steadily bowing inward for the last two years and
> no pattern has been noticed whether it takes place after heavy rains
> snowfall, etc. The limestone/mortar used is all dried up and is
> easily removed with the brush of your finger.
In this bi-months (Mar-Apr?) Old House Journal is an extensive
article describing the use of "Concrete I-Beams" to reinforce weak
foundation walls (re: Old Victorian House in S/F with quake
damage).
However, it doesn't seem like a cheaper alternatie .. but might be
worth considering. Other than removing the weight of the house
(Lally Columns) or rebuilding the foundation wall, it seems the
options are limited (I have a barn with a collapsing field stone
wall, but the lally columns are effective in lifting the weight off
the wall itself.
If you feel really desperate, try calling some of the "Restoration
Villlages" adn see if they can offer some technical advice
(Strubridge Village, Sturbridge Mass; Strawberry Banke, Portsmouth
NH, etc ) ??
-BobE
|
148.393 | Why it buckled. | XK120::SHURSKY | <DETOUR> Easy Street under repair. | Wed Mar 13 1991 13:58 | 37 |
| The reason the wall has buckled is simple soil mechanics. The side pressure
in the soil at a given depth is simply DEPTH*WEIGHT/CU.FT. This call a hydro-
static pressure. Soils are about 125 lbs./cu.ft. damp (as I recall). There-
fore, the pressure on a linear foot of wall is the area under the curve below.
This is (8*(8*125))/2 = 4000 lbs per linear foot. Now multiply by the length
of the wall to get the side force on the whole wall. The force on the wall is
resisted by the corners of the wall and the intersection with the floor. As
the mortar in your brick wall deteriorated the strength of the wall to support
this force diminished.
| |\<-- side force = 0 at surface
|w| \
|a|<-\
air |l|<--\ soil
|l|<---\
| |<----\
________|_|<-----\<-- side force = 8*125 at 8 feet
The stop gap measure of trying to brace the wall against this force was
insufficient. Jacking up the house took the weight of the house off the wall
and reduced the friction forces between the bricks and accelerated the collapse
of your wall. Though it will keep the building from falling into the cellar
hole.
The real solution is to jack up the building, excavate and put in a poured
concrete footings and wall. How much of this you can do yourself depends on
how adventureous you are. You might act as general contractor. Find a person
to excavate the old walls. You could build your own forms. My dad did this.
Then call a ready mix company to fill the (hopefully strong enough) forms.
Call the excavator to back fill the area near the wall.
Less expensive, temporary fixes might be to run I-beams across the cellar to
brace on the opposite wall. I doubt this meets codes. Or simply fill the
cellar with dirt. ;-)
Stan
|
148.394 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Wed Mar 13 1991 19:15 | 23 |
| >The real solution is to jack up the building, excavate and put in a poured
>concrete footings and wall. How much of this you can do yourself depends on
>how adventureous you are. You might act as general contractor. Find a person
>to excavate the old walls. You could build your own forms. My dad did this.
>Then call a ready mix company to fill the (hopefully strong enough) forms.
>Call the excavator to back fill the area near the wall.
I would NOT recommend this as a DIY project. My reasoning is as
follows: Few people realize just how heavy a concrete wall is.
Therefore it is not uncommon for DIYrs to make the forms too light
and have them collapse. Under the best of circumstances this is a
bad mess. In your case it could be worse. What would happen if the
forms gave way and 10-20 tons of concrete flowed into your
basement? Would the laly columns be knocked down? Its a good
possibility that they would. I suspect that the house wouldn't
totally collapse, but the situation would make the $20K quote look
like pocket change!
Of course this sort of thing can sometimes happen to professionals
too, but they have liability insurance to protect them and you.
(This is a case where you want to be sure to verify liability
insurance coverage before the contractor sets foot on your
property.)
|
148.395 | Neither would I! | XK120::SHURSKY | <DETOUR> Easy Street under repair. | Thu Mar 14 1991 12:26 | 9 |
| I wouldn't recommend it either, but the guy was asking for suggestions. And as
Clint Eastwood (a different kind of DIYer) says "A man's gotta know his
limitations".
I thought of another possible DIY approach. See above for caveat. Excavate
the buckled wall. Build a cement block wall with reinforcing rod and cement
down the holes for added strength. Backfill.
Stan
|
148.396 | Thanks..... | WMOIS::BEAN | You can lead a horse to water, but... | Thu Mar 14 1991 12:31 | 17 |
|
Thanks for your suggestions/help in this matter. I guess I needed
some feedback other than my own before I continued any farther on
this *little* project.
My plan is to jack up the existing temporary lally columns another
1/4 to 1/2" and possibly add one or two more to the support beams
that run perpendicular to the wall. My hope is that this will buy
us another six months or so, until we are in a position to finance
this project/adventure.
Question: If the house slides off the foundation and on to my
neighbors property, do I have to notify the Post Office that my
address changed??? :^)
Thanks again,
Tom
|
148.159 | Maintainance and repair of foundation | IOENG::HILL | | Fri May 10 1991 17:02 | 37 |
|
If this is covered in another note, please point me to it.
I have a house 100+ years old. The foundation for the main part on the
house is field stone capped with granite lintels, such that only the granite is
visible from the outside.
Around this foundation, the topsoil has eroded back to the point where
the whole lintel is now visible and gaps can be see between lintel ends, and
between lintel and fieldstone base.
What is the best way of re-pointing, re-sealing, repairing this
situation??
There is also an extension to the building which was of lower grade
construction, but is now an integral part of the house. It's foundation is
field stone with wood lintels/sill plates resting directly on the stones.
There is no mortar of any kind in this foundation. The cellar that this
creates is a crawl space (about 2 to 3 foot high). I want to seal this as the
wind blows straight through and has caused frozen pipes in the past. I
currently have plastic sheet on the inside as a temporary solution, but would
like to use mortar to fill the gaps.
There are two problems, first the foundation is very rough and
therefore the gaps are large and irregular (ie this is not just a case of
pointing) and secondly, the biggest section of this foundation has a screen
porch attached to that side. This effectively prevents access to the outside,
while the small size of the crawl space makes interior access difficult also.
One alternative I am considering is to add a dummy foundation wall
around the porch. It is currently supported on steel poles and is totally open
underneath. What is the best way to do this? What footings would I need?
References to a contractor that could do the job would also be good. I
know about note 2000, but which trade does this best fit? Mason?
Any other suggestions welcome.
|
148.68 | Pin it anyway regardless of code | FREDW::MATTHES | half a bubble off plumb | Wed May 15 1991 13:31 | 22 |
| I can't see this as a requirement code wise but anytime you pour
concrete in multiple pours, you want to key it somehow. When a footing
is poured, a 2x4 is pressed in the top all the way around so that when
the wall is poured, a matching tongue is part of the wall discouraging
any horizontal movement of the wall with respect to the footing.
It's not clear how the two walls meet. At a right angle ?? Any time
you add concrete to an existing pour you want to pin it. This helps to
keep the new piece in place with respect to the old.
I would not necessarily enlarge the pins. I might put in more. No, I
guess I'd tend to put in more larger pins.
Naturally, if it's all one pour, then it's one piece of concrete -
course you're adding on ... tough to do this all at once.
I've heard stories of dams being poured or huge complexes like the
Prudential Center being pured - truck after truck - 24 hours a day - 7
days a week till it's done. Someone slips and falls in - he winds up
buried there. By the time they dig him out he's dead anyway and you
wind with a bad pour. I have no idea as to the veracity of this. May
be an old story told to me by concrete finishers as entertainment.
|
148.261 | Soil considerations for foundation? | MAST::WEISS | | Thu May 16 1991 14:52 | 32 |
|
Folks,
I could use some advice. A few days ago, our builder dug the foundation for
our soon-to-be new house. Anyway, the soil conditions at the bottom of the
hole are not too good. After several days without rain, the soil is still wet,
and there are several places where you can literally sink into the mud. The
soil has a high clay content, and appears to have poor drainage and is somewhat
unstable.
As this is the first time I've looked closely at foundation holes (!), I don't
know what to expect, although I believe this not a good place to start. The
location on the lot is satisfactory, so I don't necessarily want to move the
house, and I'm not sure I'd have much say in the matter anyway ("builder
reserves right to determine placement on lot", etc). I haven't spoken with
the builder about this yet since I'd like to get educated on the matter first!
I assume that the building codes will protect me somewhat, and that the builder
will probably have to pour larger footings, etc. What I'd like to know is
what should I watch out for in terms of foundation considerations. Should
I allow construction to continue provided the builder meets code? Is it still
possible to get a reasonably solid foundation? Is this situation common in
New England? (house is located in Westford MA)
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
...Ken
PS: Mr. Moderator - I saw/read lots of topics on foundations, but none dealing
with soil/stability considerations.
|
148.262 | good luck | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Thu May 16 1991 15:24 | 14 |
| a friend of mine hit clay, and had all kinds of problems with drainage,
they ended up trucking out literally hundreds of tons of the stuff then
trucked in tons of gravel... they can't put footings on clay as it's
not a good solid base.
He not only used perimeter drains outside the footings but used them
around the inside as well as across the basement floor.
he hasn't had any problems with drainage, but took the necessary
precautions based on what he saw after a couple of days rain in his
cellar hole.
Fra
|
148.263 | Outside of foundation more of a problem than inside... | SASE::SZABO | | Thu May 16 1991 15:53 | 15 |
| My home, as well as the 70-something others in my `development' are
on/in clay. I haven't seen a trace of water in my basement in four
years. The only water-in-the-basement complaints I've heard from
neighbors are the ones who have this enormous hill that starts in their
back yards, and from the ones who've had foundations that were
defective. I've even a slight crack in my foundation from, I presume,
settling, and I've never had a problem.
The only problem I've experienced from having clay (sub)soil is
difficulty in keeping shrubs and trees from drowning, and excessive
moisture in my backyard mostly due to my neighbor's driveway rain
runoff...
FWIW,
John
|
148.264 | | HKFINN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu May 16 1991 16:11 | 10 |
| If you put in a big enough footing it shouldn't be a problem, but
IT ALL DEPENDS on the particular situation. You might bring up
your concerns with the building inspector. He's supposed to
inspect the foundation and be sure it's suitable for the conditions,
after all. I expect you'll be okay. A house, in fact, is pretty
light (relatively speaking). The load per square foot is fairly
low. The foundation wall itself probably is heavier than the house
it's holding up....the ground has to hold up the whole package, of
course, but you're still not talking about really heavy loads per
square foot unless you're building a solid brick house or something.
|
148.265 | | KOALA::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Thu May 16 1991 16:31 | 7 |
|
Clay has nothing to do with it. Where I grew up (Syracuse NY), the
whole are is clay. In fact there's a town called Clay. They've been
doing it in there for a few hundred years, and I'd say that there are
probably over 1 million homes and buildings built there.
Mike
|
148.266 | Hurrah,hurrah, the country's rising/Henry Clay and Frelinghuysen | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu May 16 1991 16:42 | 4 |
| Mike --
Are you sure that Clay's named after the stuff and not some person?
Perhaps Henry Clay?
|
148.267 | Fron Down South | ODIXIE::RAMSEY | Put the Environment First | Thu May 16 1991 17:23 | 1 |
| Every single house in Atlanta Georgia is built on clay.
|
148.268 | | KOALA::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Fri May 17 1991 11:10 | 7 |
|
re .6
It's probably named after Henry Clay. But the town sure has a lot of
clay. Maybe Henry Clay was named after the top-soil. 8*)
Mike
|
148.269 | ditti what bruce said | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Fri May 17 1991 12:18 | 11 |
| Bruce thats exactly what the guy who I was refering to in .1 did.
(i.e. coal tar/poly stone/drains/poly etc...) hasn't had a problem
since.
while there may be better situations around the country where clay is
present, this guys celler hole was nothing but a big soupy mess after a
couple of days of rain. Were talking quicksand here.... and based on
the water retention factor of clay anything you can do now while it's
open to insure a dry basement is to your benefit.
FWIW, fra
|
148.270 | | VIEW3D::YOST | | Fri May 17 1991 14:39 | 27 |
|
You don't want to build a foundation on wet clay, check the water
table level and as a previous reply suggested put in drainage pipes
to drain water away from the footings, put gutters and roof overhangs
to minimize water around the foundation. Compared to other soils,
clay has the worst load bearing capacity (1000-2000lbs/ft2), so wider
footings and pads (example, brick chimney pad ) may be needed. If
the water table is high maybe a different foundation is better for
you.
The clay around your foundation will still become wet. This will
make the soil shift more under the footing , usually in an non-uniformed
fashion, also when wet clay freezes its expansion produces alot
of pressure on your foundation wall. Recommend you put 3 or more
runs of rebar to stiffen your footings and also a keyway. The foundation
walls when poured then "key" into the footing and are more resistant
to side pressure, rebar the foundation walls as well. I went with
a stronger 3000# concrete as well.
Another option is to remove the damn clay. Amazing how miserable
wet clay is to walk on, it can suck a pair of rubber roots right
off your feet!
Your concern is justified, get help.
clay (my name, small coincidence)
|
148.69 | Don't try this at home...;^) | DEMON::DEMON::CHALMERS | Ski or die... | Fri May 17 1991 19:08 | 14 |
| re:.26 (continuous pouring)
I once worked for a large construction company (Turner Constr.) that
built many of the larger concrete buildings (vs. steel beam & girder)
in Boston. One of the more innovative jobs was the Westin Hotel in
Copley Place. Not only did they continuously pour 'round the clock,
(we would often have 18+ trucks from Boston Sand & Gravel lined up
around the block waiting to pour) but for the central core, which would
contain the utility mains, elevator shafts, etc..., they used a system
of forms that were constantly moved upward (verrrrrrryyyyy slowly,
obviously...) via an hydraulic system. As the form moved up, more
concrete was poured in. By the time the form 'released' the concrete
at the bottom, it had already dried. pretty neat trick, especially
since it's a 30+ story building...
|
148.397 | the saga continues... | WMOIS::BEAN | You can lead a horse to water, but... | Mon Jun 24 1991 13:02 | 40 |
|
Well, it's been a few months and our house is still standing. We went
ahead and installed about 6-7 more lally columns which has helped, but
not cured our problem.
We had two structural engineers who own and run their own construction
firm down in the basement (or cellar) the other day to give us their
opinion of the problem; what caused it, how our temporary fixes are
holding up, and what can be done about it.
First, they talked of building a retaining wall inside the cellar,
supported by steel rods into a footing in the floor and also into
the current foundation. But by the time we finished the "tour"
of the cellar, he had reconsidered for the following reason.
He stated that even if we build a retaining wall strong enough to
stop the foundation from buckling, it sould not stop the foundation
from continuing it's slow, but steady deterioration. re; lime becoming
a fine powder and the old bricks settling. Oh yeah, if we went this
route, we would lose a stairway down to the cellar which is currently
our tenants laundry room/workshop.
We have decided to excavate the dirt from the side of the house, jack
the house, replace the old red brick with either poured cement or
cinder block. We also are having the rear walls of the two additions
knocked out and replaced with cinderblock. We are starting with the
rear walls first, because we can afford it now; and do the buckling
wall next year when we can take out a home improvement loan.
Doing the rear walls first should give the house some extra stability
for when we do the side wall that is buckling. It's all rather
confusing and difficult to explain it in this conference, so I
apologize if you're confused as I am.
I'm just grateful that we got this sructural engineer to help us
understand that it is not the end of the world, that what we've done
so far is fine, and that they can fix it right over time; and with
some money.....
Tom
|
148.260 | Insulate the foundation | COMET::ALBERN | | Wed Jun 26 1991 19:40 | 8 |
|
Concerning an unheated foundation. The simple solution to prevent
heaving of the walls is to insulate the foundation cap. The only reason
there is a frost line at four feet is because four feet of dirt has an
R value of (mumble mumble). Simply match or better that R value and you
will have no problems.
Bob A.
|
148.160 | sure, yeah, it weights a ton allright! | HPSTEK::HAUSRATH | Too many projects, not enough time | Thu Aug 01 1991 15:46 | 10 |
|
I need to estimate the weight of a LARGE piece of granit supporting the
sill in my P&B barn. Anyone have a density number for granit handy
(pref. in lbs/ft**3, however, I'd be happy to convert from anything
you've got).
Many thanks,
/Jeff
|
148.161 | | DOMINY::TAYLOR | no tool like an old tool. | Thu Aug 01 1991 16:36 | 14 |
148.162 | | ASDG::NOORLAG | Date Noorlag , HLO2-3/J9 , dtn 225-4565 | Thu Aug 01 1991 20:00 | 31 |
148.163 | A little bit more accurate | ELWOOD::LANE | | Fri Aug 02 1991 11:18 | 16 |
| > You can do it in this way:
> - fill a cup with water;
> - mark the water level;
> - put in the granite chip;
> - weigh the cup;
> - pour out water until it is at its old level;
> - weigh the cup again.
Put an empty bowl on a scale and weigh it
Place a smaller bowl inside larger one
Fill smaller bowl to maximum
Gently put sample in smaller bowl - water spills over into large bowl
Remove small bowl and sample without spilling more water.
Weigh the large bowl containing spilled water
> The difference of the weights is the water displacement.
|
148.164 | How important is the accuracy of the wgt measurement? | WUMBCK::FOX | | Fri Aug 02 1991 12:19 | 1 |
| Could the density vary throughout the piece?
|
148.165 | grump, grump, grump... | DOMINY::TAYLOR | no tool like an old tool. | Fri Aug 02 1991 12:51 | 10 |
| Oh c'mon, folks...
He just wants to know if he can move this thing with a crowbar, or if he
needs a D7 tractor.
Who *cares* how we measure it, or if the density varies?
Sheesh...
- bruce
|
148.166 | | ASDG::NOORLAG | Date Noorlag , HLO2-3/J9 , dtn 225-4565 | Fri Aug 02 1991 12:52 | 17 |
| Sure. But by taking a representative sample of the granite it should be
possible to get the density accurate within 10%. Depending on what the
boulder looks like, it may be more difficult to get the size accurate
within 10%
I assume the original question was asked because the boulder needs to be
removed. Then you want to know whether you are dealing with a 10 ton boulder
or a 20 ton boulder. You don't want to hire a piece of equipment that can't
do the job, but you don't want a lot of overkill also ($$$$$).
If you can get the weight accurate within 20%, you're in good shape. It
doesn't make a lot of difference whether the boulder is 10 tons or 12 tons.
But then you need to know both the density and the size within 10%.
A geologist can probably tell you the density by just looking at the boulder.
But if you're not a geologist, and don't know anyone who is, you can find
out for yourself by using a scale, a bowl and some water.
|
148.167 | more details | HPSTEK::HAUSRATH | Too many projects, not enough time | Fri Aug 02 1991 17:08 | 23 |
|
-.2 had it about right. I just need to know if I'm gonna need more
than a 2 1/4 ton floor jack to raise the sucker up about 6".
What's happened is that the slab is rotating inward pivoting on
one end which supports a corner of the barn. The end that has rotated
in has also sagged roughly 6" from the top of the fieldstone it should
be resting on. A rough guess (I still have to measure it) is that the
slab is 10'x3'x8" or 20 ft**3 for a weight in the range of 3000-4000
lbs. So it might be pushing it, but I believe the floor jack should
do the job. Only thing else I need to dig up is a come-along to
persuade it back into place.
re: Metric system.. being an engineer I'm quite aware of the
benefits of the metric system, however, most jacks sold in the
US list their capacities in tons, hence the request for a density in
lbs/ft**3.
Thank you all for the info, any suggestions from people who have had to
do this type of thing before would be greatly appreciated.
/Jeff
|
148.168 | Are you sure you want to DIY?? | ASDG::NOORLAG | Date Noorlag , HLO2-3/J9 , dtn 225-4565 | Fri Aug 02 1991 20:41 | 11 |
| What you're describing is somewhat more than just getting rid of some
annoying piece of rock! You may consider getting a pro in for an estimate
before you attempt to do it yourself.
Unless you *really* know what you are doing, I think you should leave
foundation work to the pros! You may end up with the barn falling on top
of you!
Know thy limits!
/Date
|
148.169 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Aug 14 1991 12:55 | 6 |
| Proceed with all deliberate caution. Be really careful that the jack
or any temporary support posts don't kick out on you.
Keep fingers and toes out from under...ALWAYS.
Remember that Archimedes was right.
|
148.398 | Bulging Walls: Another Tear-Jerker | BOBA::ANDERSON | | Wed Sep 25 1991 02:39 | 53 |
|
I own a 16 year old contemporary split-level. The house is set on a
hill and a slab. The slab actually juts into the side of the hill
on one end and the first floor rooms on that side actually have retaining
walls on the outer walls that are backed by earth (i.e. basically is
a basement wall).
=====Roof
Hill ^ |-----
| Second Floor
Ground ->-----=====
|
| First Floor
Slab-> ======
We've been in the house 5 years. Recently I noticed that at the top
of the sheet-rock (these are finished rooms)in the rooms against the
outer wall on the first-floor, a "wavy-like" appearance was occuring,
bulging say 1/4" in between the wall studs, the lower-part of the wall
looking ok. A tile bathroom sits adjescent to the bedroom in question
with one tile wall built against the outer wall. It showed a feather
crack running horizontally across the tile enclosure about 3/4s of the
way up the wall. Finally I peeled back a single sheet of drywall and was
able to notice a crack running horizontally a little less than a 1/4 inch
thick at the same hieght as the feather crack in the bathroom. No other
cracks in the wall. This crack appeared to be running horizontally
as far as I could see minus tearing down more of the drywall. I don't
appear to have (nor have I had)any water damage from this crack. As I
said, the walls were poured concrete.
Having read some previous notes I am making the following assumptions:
1-This is serious, while at this time I'm only seeing minor
cosmetic affects, ie., the slight bowing of the wall at the
top of the drywall.
2-Big $$$ to repair: time to sell the house.
3-This is being caused earth shifting against the wall.
Unfortunately, the walls looked fine when we bought the house and nothing
showed up in the inspection.
I'll definitely get a structural engineer to look at the house--but let
me ask 2 things: 1- Is it safe for me to be in the house; will it collapse
tommorow?? 2-What are some of the options if we choose to stay & what kind
of big-bucks may I be talking?? The only wall butting up against the
earth is the one in question and it runs maybe 30-32 feet length wise.
I know this is depressing. Any comments and or advice?
Thanks,
|
148.399 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Sep 25 1991 10:30 | 20 |
| Re: .13
Well, don't get too depressed until an engineer looks at it. If
you're luckly, you're misinterpreting what you're seeing...but
if you're not lucky, it is depressing indeed.
No, the house won't collapse tomorrow. Assuming it's doing what
you think it's doing, it could keep that up for years, to the point
that pieces of the wall were coming down, and the house would still
stay up. (Not exactly square anymore, but it would still stay up.)
I don't have any bright ideas. I would encourage you to get the
engineer out as soon as convenient, because it will be cheaper to
fix the sooner you start, I expect. You may be able to excavate
the dirt along that back wall and refill with gravel or something,
with a drain along the bottom, and that might relieve the pressure...
depending on exactly what is causing the pressure. My hunch (only
a hunch) is that relatively dry gravel would apply less pressure
than wet dirt. If the wall is damaged enough to need replacement,
it will get "interesting."
|
148.400 | retaining wall and/or tile drains | SENIOR::HAMBURGER | So many interests, so little time/$$$! | Wed Sep 25 1991 11:38 | 33 |
|
RE:.13 I would second Steve's thoughts.
Get an engineer to confirm/relieve your fears ASAP. You will sleep better
at night knowing what you are facing, rather than facing the unknown.
Two thoughts around the back wall, assuming you have to do something to it.
First, if there is not a footing tile drain, I would install one and
backfill with the gravel as Steve mentioned. That should relieve water
pressure, a real killer of walls, foundations,etc. Water has incredible
pressure at times and could be causing the problem.
Second, you might want to level out the back yard a bit by digging a
deep(!) footed retaining wall behind the house that will stop the pressure
of the hill behind from pushing into your house directly. (terrible ascii
graphics to follow....
you have now>\ \
\ | <house \ |<wall
Hill >\ | \| |<house
\| | |
| |---|
| ^ small open flat area
It isn't pretty, but it may be the best way to relieve pressure against
the foundation if that is really the problem.
Do you have a part of the wall where you can hang a plumb line from the
ceiling down to the floor? That should tell you how much deflection, if
any, you are really getting. It also sets a benchmark for future reference
if the engineer says "just watch it for a year".....
Vic
|
148.401 | Thanks--I'll reply back on what we find... | BOBA::ANDERSON | | Wed Sep 25 1991 14:16 | 50 |
| Thanks Steve & Vic. You guys are great--I don't think I've
ever got a quicker response with real thoughtful feedback.
Hats-off to you guys and this notesfile.
I'll hang the plumb line tonight to see if I can get the
deflection. It doesn't seem so bad right now and hasn't
appeared to grow much over the last year or so (since I
noticed it).
I looked at the horizontal crack again last night and the
edges on either side don't appear to be offset that much
--probably a finger-nails worth.
Another guy mentioned to me today that the "wave" affect that
I noticed along the top of the wall may not stem from the
crack, but cool air and moisture that maybe coming in from
up near where the retaining wall meets the ground and the
sill for the second floor begins. At this point the "wave"
is only noticable at the top of the first-floor wall. The
rest of the wall (say 3/4's of the way up to the bottom)is
at least visably plumb/level.
Vic--I appreciate your reply. A thing I forgot to mention
--the hill does not come straight up against the house.
Its more like how you suggested. The hill is gradual and
comes down, say, to 12-15 feet away from the side of the house.
There the contractor leveled the lot--so that its reletively
flat (for 10-15) up until you reach that wall.
Two additional things: The crack runs horizontally at about
6 ft up on the 8 ft wall. Its not down near the bottom of
the wall. So, I'm guessing, but its probably 1 1/2 ft. down
from ground-level outside. Second, Outside on the ground
against that side of the house is a pad where two air-conditioners
sit. I noticed (believe it or not--I guess I'm not too
perceptive)that they put the condensate drain right outside
the side wall with no drainage pipe leading the water away
from the area. So, during the summer, the water must just
drain right into the soil against the water. I'm wondering
whether enough water would drain into the soil to cause the
pressure effect you guys are talking about? If so I can fix
the air-condition drainage problem--but will that keep the
wall from, over time, moving in on the first floor bedroom?
All said, I'll call in the Engineer and report back on the
findings.
Again--thanks,
b.
|
148.402 | AC shouldn't be a problem | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Wed Sep 25 1991 15:10 | 23 |
| I wouldn't think an AC could generate enough water to cause a problem.
The two biggest ways I know of to have a water problem are
a) Rainwater/snow melt routed towards the foundation. This can be
mitigated by sloping the soil downward as you move away from the
foundation. A lot of houses have this problem -- especially if they
are built into a hillside.
b) High water table: If there ground water level is high, nothing
but a sump pump, french drain, or something like that is going to help.
I'm no expert on foundation problems, but I'd think that if the crack
is caused by hydrostatic pressure, you should see water leaking through
it after a drenching rain. Today in central Mass sure qualifies!
Luck,
Larry
PS -- If cool air is bowing your wallboard, I guess that means there's
no insulation between the wallboard and the foundation? If you have to
take down the wallboard to fix this, do yourself a favor and install a
vapor barrier and the best insulation you can fit in -- especially within
a few feet of ground level.
|
148.403 | bad pour? | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Wed Sep 25 1991 15:22 | 6 |
| My guess is that you got a bad pour when they did your foundations. The
fact that the crack is horizontal, and if I understand you correctly,
less than two feet below grade - where pressure should not be too great,
suggests to me that there was a flaw in the concrete. Perhaps
heat/cold/settling triggered the crack. If this is the case I would
still watch it, but I would worry less.
|
148.404 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Sep 25 1991 17:52 | 3 |
| re: .18
Sounds quite likely to me too.
|
148.405 | | CSC32::GORTMAKER | Whatsa Gort? | Fri Sep 27 1991 00:19 | 4 |
| re.18
Ditto, Sounds like a cold joint in the concrete when it was poured.
-j
|
148.406 | Advice needed | ALOSWS::KOZAKIEWICZ | Shoes for industry | Mon Sep 30 1991 21:00 | 30 |
| I suppose this is as good a place as any to ask this:
Our house was built in 1986. The basement walls are poured concrete.
Sometime over the last few years, each of the four walls has developed
full length vertical cracks. This causes a problem with water on three
of the walls (the fourth is not an exterior wall). The largest of the
cracks is about 1/4"-3/8" at the widest point. They all leak water to
one extent or another. The leakage seems to be worst during the
spring when the soil is soft (we have clay and this has been a d-r-y
summer) and there is runoff from the roof, such as when it rains. As
luck would have it, one is under the front walk and another is under
the garden. I want to fix the problem properly.
I had number one son excavate a large hole next to the foundation where
the single accessible crack is located. My original thought was to
chisel out the crack on the outside, fill it with mortar or some sort
of filler designed for the purpose and then reseal the repair with tar.
However, when the hole was completed I noticed two things: When the
hole fills with water, I now get no seepage inside and, more
significantly, the crack is just a barely perceptible hairline on the
outside.
I'm not sure if there is any significance to the fact that the crack
only seems to leak when it's covered with backfill. I'm more concerned
about how to repair the wall. With only a hairline crack, I'm reluctant
to disturb the wall too much. Any ideas on how to implement a quality
repair job??
Al
|
148.407 | Similar situation. | XK120::SHURSKY | How's my noting? Call 1-800-BUM-NOTE! | Tue Oct 01 1991 09:59 | 12 |
| After we moved in our house a crack similar to the one you describe appeared
in our foundation and dribbled water when it rained. We crabbed to the
builder and he sent someone out. They chiseled out the crack inside the base-
ment and filled it with hydraulic cement. They used a backhoe outside and also
chiseled (I think) and filled with hydraulic cement, covered the crack with tar
then plastic and then backfilled. Everything has been fine for years now.
Should a problem arise I have been planning on installing gutters and running
the runoff out into the woods. I have been planning to do this for about 5
years now. Since there is no pressure, hey, no problem.
Stan
|
148.408 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Oct 01 1991 10:02 | 2 |
| I think I'd chisel out the crack on the outside, slightly, then run a
bead of silicone caulk into it.
|
148.409 | A few more ideas | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Tue Oct 01 1991 18:01 | 20 |
| Maybe water only seeps in near the top of the crack, so water only leaks
in if the top of the crack has earth against it.
Since it is exposed, certainly chisel it out a bit and put hydraulic
cement in it. (Or caulk, if it's a long lasting kind like silicone).
If you can, grade the ground and use downspouts & spash plates to keep
water away from that area. Another trick is to bury a shingle where
the crack is, to keep deflect surface water that does reach that point.
I had a small crack that leaked in rainstorms. After watching the
builder "fix" the problem by smearing hydraulic cement in it (he
didn't even chisel it out), I fixed it myself by grading the outside.
It turned out that that was all that was necessary. I'm impressed with
a builder who actually dug outside the foundation to fix the crack.
Luck,
Larry
PS -- I've been told that small vertical cracks are not a structural
problem in poured cement walls.
|
148.271 | Some more soil types... | RICKS::NORCROSS | Mitch Norcross, SEG/AFL/Systems | Tue Oct 22 1991 15:24 | 19 |
| Can anyone translate into layman's terms any of the following soil
descriptions? This is from a subdivision site plan in the Hollis NH
area. Maybe we can make this the official "Soil Science" topic.
Canton Fine Sandy Loam 0 - 8% Slopes
Canton Fine Sandy Loam 8 - 15% Slopes
Canton Stony Fine Sandy Loam 3 - 8% Slopes
Canton Stony Fine Sandy Loam 8 - 15% Slopes
Chatfield-Hollis-Canton Complex 8 - 15% Slopes
Chatfield-Hollis-Canton Complex 15 - 35% Slopes
Chatfield-Hollis-Canton Outcrop Complex 15 - 35% Slopes
* Leicester Walpole Complex Stony 3 - 8% Slopes
Scarboro Stony Mucky Loamy Sand
* - This is the only one I really need to find out about.
Thanks,
/Mitch
|
148.272 | You need to ask a C.E. | CADSYS::HECTOR::RICHARDSON | | Wed Oct 23 1991 14:42 | 7 |
| I think you need to find a friend who majored in civil engineering - I
believe those are "standard" soil descriptions, so someone with the
right book can look them up. The closest I have ever been is when my
husband needed to order a quantity of "Arizona road dust number
something or other" for testing some equipment in a dusty environment.
/Charlotte
|
148.273 | Maybe I can help. | XK120::SHURSKY | We are just monkeys with car keys. | Wed Oct 23 1991 15:51 | 25 |
| I don't know if these are standard soil types but they refer to the soil
composition. They refer to the mix of coarse and fine soil components. You
should be able to get a graph of the soil composition. What they do is take
a stack of screens from coarse to fine and pour the soil in the top. Each
sucessively finer screen retains some of the soil. Then you plot the result.
| x
S R | x
o e | x
i t | x
l a | x
i | x
n | x
e | x
d | x
------------------------------------------------
Screen Size ->
Or something like that but you get the idea.
The slope description probably gives you an idea how steep you can make a slope
before it becomes unstable. The coarser the grain of the soil the steeper you
can stack it.
Stan
|
148.274 | lovely name | RAGMOP::T_PARMENTER | Calling all cows | Thu Oct 24 1991 11:55 | 2 |
| I beleive the slope at which a particular material is stable is called
"the angle of repose".
|
148.70 | puting a door through a foundation | MILPND::STUART | | Tue Nov 12 1991 15:45 | 23 |
|
This may deserve it's own note but thats up to the moderator ...
I'd like to put a door to the outside from my garage. The garage
is at basement level and the front and back walls are about 4'
high concrete knee-walls with wood construction on top. There is
living space over the garage. I would cut through as shown below...
TOP VIEW
--------------------------------------- ---------|--|
_______________________________________ door _________|__|
| |
| |
overhead door --->
will this weaken the corner to the right of the door ? it's all
by itself now ...
Is this a DIY ? what kind of awesome tool do I need to rent ??
Randy
|
148.71 | | SASE::SZABO | You're damn right, I got the Blues | Tue Nov 12 1991 17:32 | 11 |
| I'm interested in doing the exact same thing at pretty much the same
location on my house as the previous reply explains, only, instead of
cutting through a straight concrete wall, I want to eliminate the
concrete fireplace "jog". This is also about 4 feet high with a wooden
structure the rest of the way up the garage wall. I have no fear or
problem with doing this, just not sure how to handle it. Part of my
concern is waste disposal (I will not bury the concrete remains in my
back yard!)...
Thanks,
John
|
148.72 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Nov 13 1991 10:25 | 5 |
| Re: .30
Just curious....why are you concerned about burying the concrete?
Marc H.
|
148.73 | | SASE::SZABO | You're damn right, I got the Blues | Wed Nov 13 1991 13:00 | 15 |
| > ...why are you concerned with burying the concrete?
Not so much concerned, just really don't want to do it. #1, I just
spent considerable money, time, and effort into re-doing my backyard
(never had a decent lawn, and now I finally have one) and I don't want
to wreck it. #2, my experience over the last 4.5 years at this house
has been that I only dig when absolutely necessary because there's
always something down there that will make the job damn near impossible
to finish. If it isn't buried construction materials, it's that clay
subsoil that'll bring out my extensive vocabulary of curse words... :-)
Also, if I had more than 8,875 square feet (minus the 24'x36' house) of
land, I'd probably find a burial site somewhere...
John
|
148.74 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Nov 13 1991 13:50 | 3 |
| O.K.....maybe you can find a place needing "clean fill".
Marc H.
|
148.75 | retaining concrete walls? | AKOCOA::CWALTERS | | Thu Nov 14 1991 12:06 | 18 |
|
Question from N.H. about concrete foundations and frostlines.
I have a steeply sloping front yard and next spring I want to
terrace it as it's a bugger to mow. I'm thinking of a formed concrete
retaining wall, buttressed at 6' intervals and drained every 2'.
This will be faced with loose-laid fieldstone. It will only be about
3' hight, so normally I'd only lay an 18" footing (if I can get that
deep as the house is on rock ledge). The frontage is about 50'
Do I need a permit to do this, and will the wall be subject to
building codes regarding the depth of the footing?
regards,
Colin
|
148.76 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu Nov 14 1991 14:38 | 5 |
| re: .34
Answer to both questions: I wouldn't think so. Final authority
is your town building inspector, but I can't see why he'd be
interested in landscaping details that have no direct bearing
on the integrity of your house.
|
148.77 | Only conservation folks concerned. | HDLITE::FLEURY | | Fri Nov 15 1991 09:47 | 10 |
| RE: .33
I believe that the only town officials that may be interested are the
conservation committee (or equivalent). But even they wouldn't be
interested unless you are closer than 150' to protected wetlands or
conservation land. Their concern is the change in runoff of rain
water. A quick call to the town to check the wetlands maps should
suffice.
Dan
|
148.78 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Fri Nov 15 1991 10:09 | 11 |
| RE: .36
The 150 foot number is not accurate across the state of Mass. The state
number is 100 ft for the "buffer zone" to the wetlands. In the buffer
zone or the wetlands....contact the local conservation commission.
Not sure if the towns can ~legally~ change the 100 ft number to 150 ft.
Although,some towns do try it.
Marc H.
|
148.79 | A caveat | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Tue Nov 19 1991 18:22 | 7 |
| But from what I understand, using formed concrete or even mortar is a very
bad idea unless there is a footing with well draining soil under it. Aside
from cost, one of the advantages of landscape timbers is that they don't
crack when frost heave pushes up underneath them.
Enjoy,
Larry
|
148.80 | previous questions | MILPND::STUART | | Wed Nov 20 1991 14:12 | 7 |
|
hey ! remember us ?? .29 and .30 .....
someone must have done this before ...\
Randy
|
148.81 | Rotary drill to cut thru concrete. | SMURF::PINARD | | Wed Nov 20 1991 15:24 | 28 |
| Well I've partially done it, on my house, the concrete is cut out,
but I haven't installed the door yet... Start too many projects and
dont finish many!! ;^)
In my case my foundation was about a foot and half high, I used a
Rotary hammer drill (electric) that can be rented , $30 4 hours,
$42 day...
My door is going where a double hung window was so I already have
a header in place.
Where I cut through the sill of the wood wall, I put a piece of
1/4 inch thick angle iron to hold the sill to the foundation,
because this sill doesn't seem to have any fasteners when it was built.
There are other notes about cutting through concrete in this file.
You may want to watch out for the door top clearing the garage door
rails, my ceiling is low and it just misses...
I'm sure somebody will want the solid fill, I have some to get rid of
from some front steps I broke up, just a matter of getting around to
it. (Someone showed me a round toit, but he wouldn't give it to me!)
;^)
The fireplace one should already have the right support built in
for the floor and a header may not be needed.
Jean
|
148.82 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Nov 20 1991 15:54 | 14 |
| There's some notes in here someplace about hiring somebody to come
with a concrete saw to cut through concrete. If I were contemplating
it, I'd probably hire somebody. It will give you a clean, smooth
edge (unlike the edge you'd get if you try to drill/hammer/bash).
It will also save a heck of a lot of work. Not cheap, but it will
be done quickly and well.
As far as the remaining piece of wall needing support...it may.
I can't really visualize exactly what your situation is, but you
may want to tie the top of the wall into the sill there, if it's
not already. I have a vaguely similar situation with a door through
my cellar wall and, about 2' over, a window. The narrow section
of concrete between the two will move, if you push on it hard enough.
It's not a problem though, as there is nothing pushing on it normally.
|
148.83 | cutting through cement | WHTAIL::PAVN | | Wed Nov 20 1991 18:39 | 25 |
| >================================================================================
>Note 1172.29 Concrete Foundations 29 of 30
>MILPND::STUART 23 lines 12-NOV-1991 13:45
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -< puting a door through a foundation >-
>
>
> Is this a DIY ? what kind of awesome tool do I need to rent ??
>
You can saw through a 10 in concrete wall with a 14 in. diamond tipped
saw and a tool that looks like a chain saw. These can be rented but be sure
of the costs first. You may find that you will have to pay for the total cost
of the saw. The cutting will go alot faster with less wear if you use alot of
water on the saw blade, this will also keep the dust down.
The whole job, cutting of the cement should take about 2 1/2 hours.
Good luck.
Dwayne
|
148.84 | | TOKLAS::feldman | Larix decidua, var. decify | Tue Nov 26 1991 15:36 | 14 |
| re: .37 (and apologies for the digression)
In MA, while the 100ft buffer is the general rule of thumb, it isn't an
absolute limit. Work within the buffer is presumed to require a decision
by the ConCom; "no impact and no conditions" is a possible decision.
Work outside the buffer is presumed to be of no concern to the ConCom, unless
there is concrete evidence (pun very intentional) that the work will have
an effect on the wetlands. If, for example, you paved a large area entirely
outside the buffer zone in such a way that a large runoff would enter the
100ft buffer zone and proceed to damage the wetlands, the ConCom could
impose conditions on the work.
Gary
|
148.85 | When it comes to rules...we have plenty! | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Nov 26 1991 17:06 | 7 |
| Re: .43
True.....since you are now impacting the Buffer Zone . Also,some towns
have additional regs around the % of the land in your lot that can be
paved over. I know that Grafton Mass. has rules about that.
Marc H.
|
148.366 | camp lift | FSOA::BERICSON | MRO1-1/L87 DTN 297-3200 | Mon Dec 30 1991 15:58 | 31 |
| Help, I need to do a Camp lift. (old and sagging like a face)
My cottage is on very sandy lakefront soil (mixed with bolders) built
over 40 years ago on very tenuous pilings.. It is sagging and generaly
need of a solid foundation. The back of the camp actualy sits on the
ground while the front is up about 2' on rocks and cememt.
Its top down view is:
water
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+----------+
20' | 10' | 10'
+-------------------------+ +----------+
| |
| |15'
| |
| |
| |
+-------------------------+ +---------+
+-----------+
I cant really crawl under to dig new holes, and I wouldn' mind raising
the whole thing up a couple of feet to increase ventilation. I have
given some thought to building a "crib" under and lifting it.. and
put on external piers.
Any thoughts?
Bob
|
148.367 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Is the electric chair UL approved? | Mon Dec 30 1991 19:27 | 18 |
| The guy with the camp next door to my father's had pretty much the same problem.
It was essentially built in a swamp, and each footing settled at a different
rate, making the place rather crooked.
He had the whole place jacked up and a whole new foundation put in. What they
did was jack a whole section up a small distance, place it on temporary
supports (mostly 8x8 lumber), jack up another section and support it, then
another, then raise the first a little, ...
The idea was to keep the whole thing evenly supported at all times, else
you risk cracking plaster or windows. This place could be abused along
these lines somewhat since the settling would have done any damage that
was going to be done along these lines.
Be sure the new foundations go below the frost line, otherwise you'll have to
do the same thing again in a few years.
-Mike
|
148.368 | y | FSOA::BERICSON | MRO1-1/L87 DTN 297-3200 | Tue Dec 31 1991 11:20 | 11 |
| I have been doing some jacking on the camp, but really cant get under
it to the center support areas (much less dig foudation holes in the
center). If I did make a strong enough beam to support end to end..
anyone know what size the beam should be? .. and spacing.
| camp |
|__________________| |
beam ======================
new foundation|| ||
|
148.369 | go through the floor? | AKOCOA::CWALTERS | | Tue Dec 31 1991 11:32 | 17 |
|
Can't you lift section(s) of the floor from the inside? If this is
possible, you could put a capstan-style jack or two near the centre.
In fact, why don't you simply install the jacks permanently on
concrete slabs. That way to can always jack it up more to
compensate for future settlement - no need to put in foundations.
(These are often used to correct or cure settlement problems, with
the jack permanently set on concrete & spot welded at their final
position.)
(use tons of axle grease to prevent them rusting up).
regards,
Colin
|
148.370 | I'm floored | FSOA::BERICSON | MRO1-1/L87 DTN 297-3200 | Tue Dec 31 1991 14:27 | 7 |
| Hmmmm go thru the floor....
Dawn breaks over Marblehead.. Thanks
Where does one get capstan jacks?
|
148.371 | Check EPA, local reg.s | MAY21::PSMITH | Peter H. Smith,MLO5-5/E71,223-4663,ESB | Tue Dec 31 1991 15:08 | 9 |
| This is secondhand, so not much help beyond knowing it's possible. Some
freinds with a cabin in Maine jacked it up as described, and poured a
basement. They had enough space to get underneath, and dug more space
while the house was jacked up.
One thing to note when you're that close to the water. Many states are
very strict about what you're allowed to do to buildings that near the
water. You may want to check to be sure that this work doesn't somehow
make your building eligible for demolition...
|
148.372 | Had it done. | REFDV1::CALDERA | | Tue Dec 31 1991 16:36 | 17 |
| I had a house jacked up and a full foundation poured under it. It was
a 30x24 "L" shape the way they did it was to dig under it enough to
slide "I" beams on eway under it then "I" beams in under the other way
and under the first set, like a big tic-tac-toe diagram they put
hydrolic jacks under each "I" beam end and up she went. they dug out
the foundation hole with a Bobcat, they pouted the foundation to within
one cement blocks height of the sills, finished the foundation off with
cement blocks leaving out the ones where the "I" beams were lowered the
house about an inch. The house now rested on the cement blocks, they
slid out the "I" beams and put in 4 cement blocks and that was it. It
is much easier to write about it than it is to do but it is done all
the time. My place was on Cape Cod and fortunately I was far enough
away from the water to avoid the EPD, and DEQE.
Give me a call if you have any questions.
Paul
|
148.373 | Solid blocks? | FSOA::BERICSON | MRO1-1/L87 DTN 297-3200 | Thu Jan 02 1992 15:39 | 5 |
| I trust these were the solid cement blocks...
About how much did the job cost? How long did it take?
Bob
|
148.374 | you might have a different name for it | AKOCOA::CWALTERS | | Thu Jan 02 1992 16:33 | 16 |
|
re.4 (capstan-style jack)
I couldn't find out what they are called over here, but I know
that they are available because I saw one holding up a shaky porch in
the Shaker village this week.
The jack has a low profile - designed for short lifts where
working space is limited. The nut is massive and has holes where you
insert a bar and turn - just like a capstan. Try a rental shop?
good luck with the lift.
C.
|
148.375 | | REFDV1::CALDERA | | Fri Jan 03 1992 13:22 | 20 |
| I responce to Bob (.7).
No, they were just regular cement blocks with the hole.
The original cost was $16,800 including all materials and excavation
and back filling. After things got underway the contractor said if
we put "I" beams in under the existing wood greters it would eliminate
5 lolly columns down the center of the cellar which the architect had
put on the plans, what a great suggestion the cellar is open and
there is all unobstructed room down there. We had to get a welder for
a day and the "I" beams so the final price was $17,300.
It took about 2 weeks it would have been only 1 1/2 weeks but it rained
like mad for 3 days which put the schedule out a couple days.
I think I put the contractors name in note 2000 under foundations,
if it is not there let me know and I will get the number for you, hte
guys name was Ken KLINE, a real gentleman, good worker, no BS with him.
Paul
|
148.376 | | REFDV1::CALDERA | | Fri Jan 03 1992 13:41 | 6 |
| I did put Kens name in 2000. It is in 2007.28, my DTN has changed
since then to 232-2587.
Good luck,
Paul
|
148.377 | ex | FSOA::BERICSON | MRO1-1/L87 DTN 297-3200 | Fri Jan 03 1992 14:09 | 9 |
| The camp is rustic and in Wolfeboro NH.. 17 - 20 K improvements would
be like putting a silk hat on a pig... I think I'll jack it myself.
I'm surprised that reular cement blocks were used... I've seen them
crush (as in never work on a car suspended by blocks).
Thanks all for your assistance.
Bob
|
148.378 | I've never seen solid concrete block for sale (except the brick-sized ones) | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Is the electric chair UL approved? | Fri Jan 03 1992 14:17 | 17 |
| re .11:
> I'm surprised that reular cement blocks were used... I've seen them
> crush (as in never work on a car suspended by blocks).
Concrete is _very_ strong in compression, but rather weak in tension (unless
reinforced). A concrete block supporting a building with its holes vertical
is entirely in compression and will have no problem supporting it. Until
fairly recently, nearly all house foundations were made of concrete blocks
with the holes.
If the holes are horizontal, there will be little bridges formed. If the
load is placed on the bridges, the bridge is in tension, and may not be able
to support the load. That's why you should never attempt to support a car
with a concrete block with the holes horizontal.
-Mike
|
148.379 | | KOALA::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Fri Jan 03 1992 15:15 | 6 |
|
It wasn't until I moved to NH that I saw extensive use of poured walls.
In Upstate NY all you find is cement blocks for cellar walls. I'd say
99% of the cellar walls in Upsate NY are cement blocks.
Mike
|
148.380 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Fri Jan 03 1992 15:20 | 22 |
| re .11:
> I'm surprised that regular cement blocks were used... I've seen them
> crush (as in never work on a car suspended by blocks).
There are different qualities of "cement blocks". I don't know if
it is a technically different product or just a cheap cement
block, but there are also what are called "cinder blocks". These
would be likely to crumble under a heavy load.
Good quality cement blocks can be used as a foundation, laid right
on the footings instead of a poured concrete foundation. In some
parts of the country this is the norm for residential and light
commercial construction. A poured foundation may be aesthetically
more pleasing to some, but concrete block is entirely
satisfactory. There are some arguments to the effect that it is
easier to get a perfectly plumb, straight and level foundation
with blocks than with poured concrete.
Both systems have advantages. What your home has is more than
likely a matter of local practice than of any objective
considerations.
|
148.359 | Old house built on ledge? | FSDEV3::CABARBANELL | Carol, DTN 297-3004 | Mon Feb 10 1992 00:17 | 23 |
| I looked at a house for sale today that is approx. 70 years old,
and it is built on ledge -- i.e., half of the cellar is ledge --
kind of like a rock ledge in half the basement.
What's the effect of this? The owner does have a sump pump in part
of the basement and says there is some leakage into the cellar in
heavy rains, in just one corner, which, he says, the sump pump takes
care of.
My question is, if the foundation was poured/built around the ledge,
how good is the "seal" between where the foundation meets the ledge?
How is this usually built?
Other than esthetics, what are the drawbacks of the house being built
right into the ledge? A few replies here mention radon -- why are the
chances for radon higher with ledge?
Any comments would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Carol
|
148.360 | Add test to P&S | NICCTR::MILLS | | Mon Feb 10 1992 02:30 | 3 |
|
Just make a passing RADON test part of the P & S.
|
148.361 | | MANTHN::EDD | I refuse to talk to myself | Mon Feb 10 1992 11:30 | 10 |
| Over 1/2 my house sits on ledge. Predictably, there is one small leak
in the cellar, but a drain has taken care of it for over 30 years with
no problems. Water comes in, water goes out.
My house doesn't seem to settle. No cracks in the plaster, no leaks
developing, no foundation problems (save the above).
Pardon the pun, but it seems solid as a rock.
Edd
|
148.362 | | DPDMAI::FEINSMITH | Politically Incorrect And Proud Of It | Mon Feb 10 1992 16:04 | 5 |
| I had a house where 1/2 was on a ledge that extended INSIDE the
basement (it WAS a conversation piece). Other than giving me a
strange looking floor, it caused no other problems.
Eric
|
148.363 | Solid basement Floor | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Feb 10 1992 16:07 | 5 |
| About half of my house is also on ledge. House was built around 1830,
and still standing. Only problem with ledge is if its in your leach
area of your septic system.
Marc H.
|
148.364 | Another ditto.stable base makes for stable home. | AHIKER::EARLY | Bob Early, Digital Services | Fri Feb 14 1992 11:25 | 28 |
| re: 904.21 How Do I Find Ledge? 21 of 21
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -< Solid basement Floor >-
>About half of my house is also on ledge. House was built around 1830,
>and still standing. Only problem with ledge is if its in your leach
>area of your septic system.
Ditto ledgey area ...
The only major hassle with a house on ledge is "IF" you ever need to dig a
trench TO the house ... I had to replace a water pipe, and to do it, the
contractor had to get an extra large backhoe to get through the field
of rocks.
The house is "somewhat over" 150 years old, and generally speaking is still
square. Whether or not it was square when built, or has gone a little
bit out of square over time is not known.
During major rain storms, water comes in through the south side of
the field stone foundation, an goes out the northeast corner through
a cellar drain (the previous owner even cemented a shallow trough to expedite
this (I am on city sewer/water, so the septic caution doesn't apply).
re: Radon
Radon is more prevalent with Cement or sealed-up foundations.
Bob
|
148.365 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Is the electric chair UL approved? | Fri Feb 14 1992 19:01 | 19 |
| re .22:
>re: Radon
>Radon is more prevalent with Cement or sealed-up foundations.
Whether you have Radon depends on several things:
The type of rock under you (granite often has uranium, therefore radon)
A path from this rock to your basement. This means cracks in cement
and the rocks, or dirt.
Once radon is in the basement, how long does it hang around before it gets
out. Ventilation helps.
If you have a well-sealed basement, radon can't get in and you'll have a
low radon reading. A rock in the basement is likely to have lots of cracks,
and it itself may be the source of the radon. A cement foundation is better
than rock, or a dirt floor basement.
-Mike
|
148.275 | Stucco foundation? | VINO::SANTANGELO | | Fri May 15 1992 19:28 | 13 |
| I looked for this topic under foundations, concrete, and adhesives
and could not find it.
I would like to stucco my foundation. I put an addition on
with a full cellar, and the original house has a stucco on
the foundation, which does not match the new part.
Does anyone have any ideas on how to do this? Where to buy
materials etc? Is it something I could do myself?
Any info appreciated.
|
148.276 | Try a Local Masonry Supply House | CNTROL::STLAURENT | | Fri May 29 1992 16:29 | 15 |
| I used a stucco type product to cover the foundation insulation that
was exposed above grade. I think the product name was Drive-It?? It's
a mortar based powder with ~ 2" fiberglas hairs and you mix it with a
latex bonding agent. It or something similar should be available a your
local masonry supply house.
It's applied with a grout type (square shaped) trowel. It got harder to
apply as the temperature rose and we were working in the sun. It
should be a good DIY job on an overcast day. Your only problem will be
matching the color and texture to what you got. You may have to give
everything a fresh coat.
One more after thought, I applied it to styrofoam insulation, to get it
to hold you might have to apply it to wire mesh fastened to the bare
cement of the additions foundation??
/Jim
|
148.277 | | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Fri May 29 1992 16:50 | 11 |
|
I used the stuff mentioned in .1 in order to cover up the difference
between the old cinder-block foundation and the poured concrete
foundation of an addition. The look I wanted wasn't the "swirly"
stucco look but just that of plain concrete, so I'm not sure how
well it would work for the look you want.
As .1 says, you have to be careful not to let the stuff dry out.
And be sure to soak the surface with water before you apply it.
JP
|
148.278 | Thanks! | VINO::SANTANGELO | | Wed Jun 03 1992 17:42 | 3 |
| Thanks so much for the info, especially about doing it on an
overcast day. I was planning on doing it on a nice sunny day!
|
148.86 | need help finding styrofoam foundation blocks. | SALEM::COVIELLO | | Tue Nov 17 1992 15:26 | 6 |
| Help. anybody know where I can buy the styrofoam blocks as shown on TOH. I'm
in the process of digging out my celler (yes by hand) and I have a couple of
walls to put up.
Thanks
Paul
|
148.279 | LEAK where foundation and house meet | ASABET::POMEROY | Footprints on the Dash upside down | Fri Mar 05 1993 16:05 | 23 |
| I had a problem this past weekend with a leak. It may sound like a
"NO PROBLEM" type of question but it is. It seems that the guy who
built the deck off the back of the house took the easy way out. He
nailed a long board to the side off the house and built the deck off of
that. Well here it goes with the problem....Seems that on warmer days,
the ice/snow melts off the desk and drips down behind this board and
seems to somehow work its way between the foundation and house. It
then freezes, possible allowing more water to come in a freeze up.
Along the wall of the house runs the forced, hot water pipe that heats
our home. This is melting the ice, thus causing the leak. It was
quite a bit of ice as well. It filled a 32 gallon trash barrel about
1 1/2". I have since cleared off the snow/ice from the deck and the
leak stopped. Is there anything out on the market today that I can use
to seal around the foundation area to prevent this from happening
again. This is a first home for my wife and I and I would like to hold
onto it for a while. I do have to replace a section of sheetrock that
the drip destroyed. Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Kevin
|
148.280 | sounds like a flashing problem | SPEZKO::LEMIEUX | | Fri Mar 05 1993 19:28 | 13 |
|
Sounds like it wasn't flashed or improperly flashed at best. Shoveling
the deck after storms will help in the mean time but it needs to be
reflashed or your going to get rot, ants etc. Do you have some kind
of homeowners warrantee on the purchase of the house? Ie, new house
bought from a builder or something along those lines. Get them to
fix it. If your not able to go that route maybe your household
insurance will cover the repairs and theater damage.
Either way the deck needs to be flashed or reflashed whatever the case
may be.
|
148.281 | | LUDWIG::JOERILEY | Everyone can dream... | Sat Mar 06 1993 05:42 | 9 |
| RE:.0
It sounds like they angled the deck towards the house instead of
away from it. The water should be running to the outside edge of the
deck and falling off, not towards the house. When the weather permits
I'd shorten the outside legs that hold up the deck so the water will run
the other way.
Joe
|
148.282 | How about Caulking??? | ASABET::POMEROY | Footprints on the Dash upside down | Tue Mar 09 1993 13:11 | 16 |
| Re .1
No there is no warrenty. I purchased the home from the person who had
it built 4 years ago. I also check my Home Owners policy and this type
of problem is not covered by METPAY. Figures.
Re .2
I will look into your suggestion in the spring.
If I were to just caulk where the house sits on the foundation, would
this help in preventing rotting????
Thanks,
Kevin
|
148.283 | | CSC32::S_MAUFE | its sum-sum-sum-summertime! | Tue Apr 06 1993 22:54 | 7 |
|
Hey Kevin! I have the same deal, deck nailed to house, leaks into the
basement on the inside.
I plan to caulk when it gets warm enough to go outside.
Simon
|
148.87 | Foundation fix | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Thu Aug 19 1993 11:50 | 15 |
|
Ok, look like good place to form this note...
I"m in process of thinking of getting into another fixmeup house.
I've notice the foundation has some major cracks on one side. After
the last rain storm I found out way....No Perif drain, water backup
and presto. H2O pressure=Crack!
Seeing I have to dig around the foundation and put a drain in, Via
local codes...I'd like to pin and pour another wall in front of
the old one. Has anyone done anything like this??
JD
|
148.88 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Thu Aug 19 1993 12:34 | 9 |
| RE: .46
How will you hold the forms for the new wall? Most foundation people
need quite a bit of space on both sides for the forms.
Using exterior boards to brace the forms will not work.
Marc H.
|
148.89 | the wall | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Thu Aug 19 1993 14:55 | 15 |
| rep:
Well, drilling thru the old foundation and putting in thur
bolts to hold the forms...
---------------------------T--------- existing wall
|
===========================|=========
------------||-------------L------||- new wall
pin. spacing block
I"M hoping that I wont have to do an 8" wall seeing it not
a load bearing wall. Just a patch. Don't know. Think it will fly?
JD
|
148.90 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Thu Aug 19 1993 14:58 | 5 |
| What are you trying to achieve? If the old wall cracked, the new
wall will probably crack. Concrete is very weak in tension.
In compression it's great, but if you're thinking of pouring this
new wall to somehow tie the old wall together, it's almost
certainly not going to work.
|
148.91 | ??? | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Thu Aug 19 1993 15:13 | 14 |
|
I cant see way not? The Idea is to make one large patch. The reason
the wall cracked in the first place is due to lack of drainage,
the water behind the wall had to go somewhere and it found the
weakest spots.
A new footing. Bonding the new wall to the old and periferal
drain added, why wouldnt it work?
The other way is to open up the cracked sections, drill some rods into
the open cracks. Make a form and fill it... To me, this looks like
it would take longer???
JD
|
148.92 | why not some sort of hydraulic goop? | GNPIKE::SMITH | | Fri Aug 20 1993 13:33 | 5 |
| Why not just slop some sort of goo on the outside while you're putting the
drain in? That'll keep the moisture down.
Or are the cracks severe enough that you have to do something to
satisfy the inspector that the house will stay up?
|
148.93 | Just add water??? | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Fri Aug 20 1993 16:33 | 9 |
|
Re;
Most of it is for my own POM. But on one corner of the
house there is a rather large scale fracture. So I figured
for a few bucks more, i'll seal the full 50' with concreat,
Tar it and be done! But this could very well change after
I open the dirt up and get a few quotes........
JD
|
148.284 | Foundation Replacement - Help | AMCSAD::YATES | | Fri Aug 27 1993 14:33 | 44 |
|
Hi
- If there is a better place for this note -
- please let me know and I will move it _
I have a 90+ year old colonial with 2 additions. One of the additions
is on a slab. The other is a problem - it is an old screened in porch
that is built out of 2x? lumber and supported on a row of cinder blocks.
I would like to replace the cinder block foundation with 'regular'
foundation and add a powder room. Heres a diagram:
| Main House |
| |
+---+----------------------------+ Doorway +---------+ Doorway +-------+-+
| ||| |
| ||| |
| |||<- steps down |
| ||| |
| ||| |
| ||| |
| ||| |
| ||| |
| Slab Foundation +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
| | ^
| | |
+---------------------------------------+ Row of Cinder Blocks
The approximate measurements are:
Slab Portion 10x20
Old Porch 8x10
In the course of this effort I suspect that I will need to redo the
framing under the old porch.
I know this will be a big project - Can someone walk me through the
steps so that I can get a clearer picture of just what it will
take.
thanks in advance
tom
|
148.285 | rip it off | ASDG::DFIELD | the Unit | Fri Aug 27 1993 18:34 | 20 |
| Hi,
Well there are two general approaches to you problem. The
first would be to remove the old porch, install you foundation and
rebuild from scratch. This has the advantages of ease of access for
the foundation work and providing a known good structure.
The second option is to support the porch several feet away from
the foundation, dig and instal the foundation and lower the porch onto
the new base.
From your description, I would lean toward option #1. It may
cost a bit more, but the foundation will be easier to install and
you may correct a couple unseen problems. Secondly, your description
of 2x4 framing leads me to suspect that the porch may not meet code
as a living space.
Just my 2 cents,
DanF
|
148.286 | its really a room | AMCSAD::YATES | | Fri Aug 27 1993 19:17 | 9 |
|
I should have been more specific.
What was the old porch is now winterized living space.
Siding, windows and insulation.
tom
|
148.287 | woodchucks for rent | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Mon Aug 30 1993 10:25 | 7 |
|
Sounds like you have to support the structure and
dig out from under it. $$$$$ Better start checking
into prices......
JD
|
148.288 | Foundation help needed | SOFBAS::SNOW | Justine McEvoy Snow | Wed Oct 13 1993 13:46 | 41 |
|
I have a foundation_under_add_on_porch question. ANy advice is
welcome.
I put an offer in on a house, and we agreed to the price. Had the
inspection done (used Paul Cornell who was great and it just so happens
he got his inspection license under the guidance of my brother who
teaches code/inspection stuff.) Paul found, of course, 1000 little
things, but the big thing (and what concerns us) is that the foundation
wall under the add-on porch (now a 4-season sunroom) is a mess.
It is a cinder-block foundation and the blocks are all over the place
on two walls: back and side. This area is used as a garage. The
walls are partially underground. To be fixed correctly, Paul said we'd
need to excavate, re-align the blocks, re-point, add drainage, and then
put the dirt back against the foundation. His estimate: $8500. Or we
could tear down or support the porch, dig, pour a cement foundation and
get rid of the bricks (which apparently aren't code-sized anyway.
They're something-by-8s and should have been something-by-12s.) Again,
an expensive option.
Owners choke on the price, and get a contractor (mason) in to look at
the work that needs to be done. Their contract says he can fix this
problem for $1000.
We are probably going to get ANOTHER contractor to have a look, since
my guess is that the $1K estimate will pretty up the foundation but not
fix the problem, and the same thing will happen again in a few years.
BUT, my questions are, what seems reasonable? Are we being too picky by
insisting on another contract to see what s/he thinks? Is this a big
deal (since it's only the porch foundation, not the house foundation?)
Has anyone had work like this done and can tell me if $8500 is closer
to the right price or is $1000?
And lastly, does anyone know a good foundation expert? :-)
Thanks,
Justine
|
148.289 | Be a hard nose. | 501CLB::GILLEY | Educational entrepeneur | Wed Oct 13 1993 14:07 | 7 |
| Justine,
I'll answer your question by asking a question: Is 7500 a big deal
to *you*? Don't worry about the feelings of the current owners, do
whatever is necessary to protect yourself.
Charlie - who hates learning the hard way.
|
148.290 | A good mason should be the one for the work. | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Wed Oct 13 1993 14:10 | 13 |
|
Justine - If the blocks have been pushed around by frost etc.,
outside, then I can't think of any right way to fix them then to
excavate at least down as far as they have been moved, remove, clean,
remortar and reinstall. That said, unless its a fairly small area, I
can't imagine a decent mason charging anywhere near as low as 1K for
it. Paul C. is not dumb and he saw it, not me. If he says 8K, then I
would not think anything lower than 4 or 5K would do the same job Paul
was talking about. My guess is that the mason that gave the 1K
estimate would do his work solely from the inside. Perhaps just
repointing the blocks.
Kenny
|
148.291 | I'd say it flunked the inspection | VICKI::DODIER | Cars suck, then they die | Wed Oct 13 1993 17:18 | 24 |
| My first step would be to call the contractor that gave the $1k
quote and find out how he intended to fix the problem. There's no rule
that says you can't ask him ;-)
If after talking to him/her you find that they are treating the
symptom and not the problem, you can simply ask them what it is that
makes them think the problem won't return after their proposed fix.
It usually costs nothing to get people in to give you a quote. In
the process, you'll get an idea from them what their proposed fix is
and why the problem happened in the first place.
After getting a few quotes and sleeping on it for a night or two,
you'll probably have a much better idea of how to handle it. If the clock
is ticking down on a go/no go situation, I'd at least look at getting an
extension based on this finding.
A real estate deal is almost always set up that the sale is contingent
upon passing a home inspection. At this point, it depends on how badly you
want to buy this place and/or how badly the owner wants to sell it. It
also depends on whether the current owner can afford to fix it to your
specifications. You can't squeeze blood out of a stone.
Ray
|
148.292 | | SOFBAS::SNOW | Justine McEvoy Snow | Wed Oct 13 1993 17:26 | 18 |
|
Thanks for all the opinions/suggestions.
The blocks of the foundation have come otu of line in rows. So the
first row, at the bottom, is in place. But above that it looks
like inverted stairs. Apparently, from what we can gather, the
$1000 estimate guy is only going to put blocks UNDER the blocks
jutting out, making a thicker wall (and thus making the garage
even NARROWER.) This isn't acceptable to us. So we'll be getting
a contractor to give us another estimate, but unless we can
convince the owners that we want this fixed RIGHT, I guess we'll
be looking for houses again. Blah.
Thanks again, everyone.
Justine
|
148.293 | A better use of $8500 ??? | VICKI::DODIER | Cars suck, then they die | Thu Oct 14 1993 11:49 | 4 |
| Just as an aside, I've seen prefabed two-car garages for $8500 not
including the slab.
Ray
|
148.294 | | SOFBAS::SNOW | Justine McEvoy Snow | Thu Oct 14 1993 14:40 | 11 |
|
Where? Because putting in a REAL two car garage is in th eplans.
Someday.
Justine
P.s. - Two more contractor estimates. one said sight unseen, he
thinks it would be $3-$4K to fix. One said he needs to see it, but
anywhere between $1000 and $8500 depending on how correctly we want it
fixed! :-)
|
148.295 | Don't remember the name of the place but... | VICKI::DODIER | Cars suck, then they die | Thu Oct 14 1993 15:59 | 11 |
| The prefab I saw (about 2 months ago) was on Rt. 28 in Hookset, NH.
I don't remember the name of the place but it's on the left hand side
of the road coming off Rt. 93 heading into Hookset. It's not too far after
the first light (within a mile) if I remember right.
They also sell prefab homes too. They had both out on display. I
remember the garage because it had a huge $8500 price tag on it and I
remember thinking that it was almost as cheap as the ones that the big
lumber places sell in kit form.
Ray
|
148.296 | $8500 without a slab sounds like about par | NOVA::SWONGER | DBS Software Quality Engineering | Thu Oct 14 1993 16:45 | 9 |
| re: $8500 pre-fab
I got a quote of about $15,000 for a 2-car garage, including slab,
electrical, roofing, widening my driveway, and taking out a few
trees. This with special siding. A pre-fab unit for $8500 is about
in line with that, I think. But it doesn't sound like anything
special.
Roy
|
148.297 | masonry labor is expensive | RANGER::MCDONOUGH | | Mon Oct 18 1993 20:49 | 10 |
| We had to replace about 1/3 of the foundation of our house. We knew
about the problems when we bougth the house. The owners had to come up
with an estimate and we had to come up with one. The owner was very
happy when I told her our estimate was 8, she said her's was 850. She
was then very unhappy when I told her my 8 was 8000 not 800. Her
estimate was to repoint and shore up the foundation (similar to your
garage). My estimate was to replace the foundation. She then got a
real estimate which was 7500.
Rhonda
|
148.298 | | SOFBAS::SNOW | Justine McEvoy Snow | Tue Oct 19 1993 13:36 | 14 |
|
re -1:
Your experience sounds a lot like ours. The owner for this place
ended up taking some money off, but it was like pulling teeth. I
wondered if the owners wanted us to walk away so they could fix it for
$1000 and not have to worry about it the next time someone made an
offer.
Oh well, all's well that ends well, I guess. Now onto the
paint-removinng note, and the roof replacement note, and the...
Justine
|
148.299 | pouring a foundation in cold weather? | RANGER::KILE::Stetson | Bill Stetson, PCIE | Wed Nov 17 1993 03:03 | 9 |
| Any thoughts on pouring a foundation in cold weather. My builder
is ready to pour, but the building permit is caught up in red tape.
I'm getting nervous about pouring it in such cold weather. He says:
o they mix with hot water this time of year
o if below freezing they add calcium
o hardening cement produces heat
Should we wait till spring?
|
148.300 | | STRATA::LANGLOIS | | Wed Nov 17 1993 10:46 | 13 |
|
Mine was poured just around the same time (mid Nov) and we have
had no problems with it. I was worried also but they told me the same
as your bullets.
o if below freezing they add calcium
o hardening cement produces heat
Do not know if they mix with warm h2o
Another foundation in our
development was poured in lat Dec...No problem there either
Wayne
|
148.301 | go 4 it - slow cure | BUSY::JWHITTEMORE | Carp Perdiem | Wed Nov 17 1993 11:51 | 9 |
|
You can pour without worry until temperatures are consistently below freezing
and frost sets into the ground. This time of year has one advantage in that
with the cooler temperatures the concrete cures slower which is a better cure.
Just insure that your contractor/sub-contractor leaves the forms up an extra
day or so to accommodate the slower cure and doesn't begin attaching the sills
and framing too soon for the same reason.
-jw
|
148.302 | Costs extra for hot water and calcium! | NECSC::BARTLETT | | Wed Nov 17 1993 13:14 | 12 |
| Any foundation can be poured in cold weather with the expectation
of a trouble-free foundation. However, if cost if of concern, they
charge extra for both heater water and calcium. You may want to check
on the added cost.
On the other hand, this is a great time of year to pour. The backfill
process should be done within a few days after pouring (after sealing
of the cement walls and applying any required foundation insultation).
Working around a newly poured foundation is easy this late in the year
as the surface dirt becomes firm seen and simply planting Rye grass
will result in green grass in spring.
|
148.303 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Nov 17 1993 14:08 | 9 |
| RE: .0
I would wait till the spring. The calcium weakens the concrete;
although the foundation design is "over engineered".
Just because they often add antifreezes/calcium/etc. doesn't make it
right.
Marc H.
|
148.304 | | MRKTNG::BROCK | Son of a Beech | Wed Nov 17 1993 15:30 | 2 |
| One more vote for do it now. I believe 'too cold' only applies when it
is REALLY cold - multi-days of single digit. THIS is not cold.
|
148.305 | | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Wed Nov 17 1993 16:23 | 5 |
| I agree - it's not REALLY cold. Concrete gives off heat as it's
curing, so if you cover the concrete with tarps at night (or,
ideally, with some sort of insulator such as loose hay), I
don't see why you'd have a problem.
|
148.306 | y | MILKWY::JSIEGEL | | Wed Nov 17 1993 16:37 | 42 |
| I went through this last year, and ended up getting my foundation
poured in December, though during a warm week. My brother is a
structural engineer and deals with concrete and curing etc. He told us
that YOU NEED TO BE SURE THE CONCRETE DOESN'T FREEZE BEFORE CURING. If
it freezes before curing it can become very weak, and can easily crack
and/or crumble later. This is most likely if it is well below freezing
throughout the curing. With marginal temps, the concrete can weaken
and crack in the future. The cracks may not cause structural problems,
especially since residential foundations are usually overdesigned, but
can let water in and can be unattractive.
If the temp is above or right about at freezing there shouldn't be a
problem (though you should allow longer curing time before putting
loads on it, ie. framing). But if the temp will be below freezing you
have a few options, all of which have been used but may cost different
amounts of $$:
1. If not well below freezing, you can cover the poured concrete
with hay or blankets (our builder ended up using hay and Calcium).
The curing concrete generates heat, and the blankets or hay help to
hold the heat in longer. ($)
2. You can have a tent set up over the concrete, and use heaters to
keep the temp inside the temp above freezing. ($$$$)
3. You can add a calcium type product (there are a few different
ones), which is what most builders do. This does somewhat
weaken the concrete, but again residential foundations are usually
overdesigned so the house shouldn't fall down. But again, you
are more susceptable to cracking. You may want to get a written
guarantee from the builder that he/she will repair/fill & seal
any cracks and/or damage caused as a byproduct of any cracks that
show up the first year. (little to no extra $)
If you are decide that you definitely want to get it poured this year
during freezing weather, you should do one of the above, as the
possible problems are much less that the problems you'll have if the
concrete is allowed to freeze during curing.
FWIW based on our recent research...
|
148.307 | | CSC32::S_MAUFE | this space for rent | Thu Nov 18 1993 23:01 | 11 |
|
I poured in snow, yep they add calcium I have the burns still to prove
it! Wear gloves, top to bottom, and rubber boots. I was also told to
put heating blankets around the walls, but the weather heated up the next
day so I didn't bother with the blankets.
The main thing is to not pour on frozen ground, as it'll thaw and move
and crack you're walls. Since it was snowing when I poured, and not
before, I was OK.
Simon
|
148.308 | Mine was just poured last week... | EVMS::YAHWHO::PETROVIC | Looking for a simpler place & time... | Fri Nov 19 1993 19:53 | 7 |
| ...and I can't wait for Spring to begin building...
The contractor suggested that I not have the floor poured and left over the
winter. I just had a load of gravel delivered today to spread so the car dosen't
sit on the bare ground.
Chris
|
148.309 | we're waiting till spring | RANGER::KILE::stetson | | Fri Mar 04 1994 15:16 | 13 |
| Thanks for all the replys.
A late update:
We were still wading through red tape at the end of December so I
postponed it till spring. The red tape cleared in mid January. The
builder is gonna spend mud season getting the road up to snuff and
hopefully pour the foundation around April 1st. This will also avoid
a cement truck that just sinks in the mud. Occupancy is scheduled for
mid June. I'll be happy if we're in at the end of July. Don't wanna
rush things, but we got offspring #3 arriving in August.
bill
|
148.310 | foundation cost $$$ | WMOIS::GOSSELIN_E | | Fri Apr 01 1994 18:33 | 18 |
| Has anyone had a foundation put in lately? I am looking to have a
sunroom attached to the house with a cement foundation. It would
be full depth.
|-------|
18' x 14' x 18' | |
| sun |
| room |
| |
--------------------
| |
| house |
I am wondering on the cost.
Ed
|
148.311 | | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Fri Apr 01 1994 22:53 | 7 |
| If you can specify exactly what you want in terms of all dimensions for
footings plus walls, as well as test strength, rebar requirements, etc.,
any foundation contractor will be happy to give you a free estimate.
Do you also need costs for the associated site work (excavation, foundation
drains, etc.)?
-Jack
|
148.312 | | WMOIS::GOSSELIN_E | | Mon Apr 04 1994 19:06 | 7 |
| I had a foundation /excavator stop buy this past weekend. He is going
to call me with a price. He told me the price of labor for the
foundation runs $9.00 per linear foot, plus $55.00 per square yard of
cement, plus excavation. I will have a price this week.
thanks,
Ed
|
148.313 | | WMOIS::GOSSELIN_E | | Fri Apr 15 1994 11:29 | 11 |
| Well I got "2" prices for my 18 x 14 x 18 foot foundation. 4' wall x 7'
wall x 7' wall with footings.
conractor: #1 $2,547.00 hole & foundation
#2 $1,597.00 foundation
$ 300.00 hole
---------
$1,897.00 hole & foundation
And the winner is!!
|
148.314 | | NOVA::SWONGER | DBS Software Quality Engineering | Fri Apr 15 1994 13:01 | 11 |
| > Well I got "2" prices for my 18 x 14 x 18 foot foundation. 4' wall x 7'
> wall x 7' wall with footings.
Are both contractors specifying the same building quality for things
other than basic dimensions and wall thickness? For example, how
much rebar will be used? From what I've been told, there can be a
great difference in the amount of rebar used from contractor to
contractor, and this can make a big difference in the ability of the
foundation to resist cracking in the long run.
Roy
|
148.315 | y | WMOIS::GOSSELIN_E | | Mon Apr 18 1994 13:04 | 8 |
| I'll have to call and check. I had a third quote for just the
foundation and it was $1600.00 so two were close. The contractor
charging me the higher price did not break it down into foundation and
excavation.
Any other things I might want to ask?
thanks,
Ed
|
148.316 | | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Thu Apr 21 1994 11:49 | 5 |
| I have no idea if this is valid but maybe ask about the grade of cement,
additives they use and stuff. Is it possible to use cheaper "grades" of
cement?
George
|
148.317 | not much for cost cutting! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Fri Apr 22 1994 15:29 | 6 |
|
There are different strengths you can order. Their are standard
rating of, so many PSI that a wall or floor has to be. So if their
cutting it, you getting a clipping!
JD
|
148.181 | Steel for in concrete block foundation | NOVA::MICHON | | Wed May 04 1994 20:55 | 22 |
| I couldn't find a note on installing a door into a concrete
block foundation so I try posting it here.
I have had Jeff bear (recommended here) quote me
on installing a steel door in my foundation. It involves
removing blocks under the existing window and inserting
a steel, steel frame, nine light masonry door.
Me problem is he is quoting me $550 for a 36 inch
masonry door and and summerville lumber says they
can get it for 389. I told him to buy it
from sommerville but he tells me its not the
right typ of door but the guy at (the door manager)
tells me it is!
Could some describe exactly what I need to order to get
a 36inch, 9 light, prehung, steel door, with steel masonry
frame (to be attached right to the foundation - no presure
treated wood framing required). I need to be sure
to order everything to compare pricing.
|
148.182 | behind closed doors | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Thu May 05 1994 10:30 | 7 |
| depending on where its location is, Maybe your contractor
feels that the door he's getting has a much heavier steel
frame than the one at summerville....????? Have you
compaired his door to yours????
jd
|
148.183 | framed | NOVA::MICHON | | Thu May 05 1994 12:42 | 5 |
| Dont know I guess I should ask him to send me a copy
of his order form and then I can shop around for a better
price if in fact one exists.
-B
|
148.318 | foundation off alittle! | WMOIS::GOSSELIN_E | | Thu Jun 09 1994 19:05 | 24 |
| I have a question about foundations and the sills and floor joist. I am
willing to bet that both sides of the foundation are not of equal
heights. Do contractors level the joist and sub-floor some how or do
they simple go by what's there?
If I am confusing you, what I mean is if you add an addition to your
house and the two sides of the foundation that join to your house are
off from the existing house foundation. One cement wall is 1/4 inch
higher than the other side. A contractor told me he uses a double sill
so he can us shimes if the floor is not level. Anyone ever do this?
| house |
| |
---------------------
other -> | | <- 1/4" lower than other side
| |
| |
| addition |
| |
| |
---------------
|
148.319 | If this is your biggest problem, you'll be lucky | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Fri Jun 10 1994 02:24 | 7 |
148.320 | | WMOIS::GOSSELIN_E | | Fri Jun 10 1994 13:05 | 8 |
| The foundation was poured with a double sill in mind so there will be
one no matter what. I looked at a contractor book which talked about
putting motar on the low side to raise it up.
Do you know what other methods are used for siming?
thanks
|
148.321 | this is not a big problem | SEND::PARODI | John H. Parodi DTN 381-1640 | Fri Jun 10 1994 14:08 | 10 |
|
Your base note says only that the new foundation is 1/4" off as
compared with the old one. Could it be the old foundation that is not
level?
There are products that let you fill or re-level concrete (Levelastic
is the brand name of one), so you might look through the various
concrete topics for more info on that.
JP
|
148.17 | House Jacking, a growing problem. | LUDWIG::BERNIER | | Tue Jul 26 1994 14:06 | 16 |
|
I have to replace the sill on the house part of the "Diner".
I have dug down about a foot to where the foundation meets
the sill, yes, it is below ground level.
My question is on jacking the house.
* How far apart should the jacks be placed?
* Should I jack up the whole corner or just where the sill
to be replaced resides?
Thanks!
/Andy
|
148.18 | Heeeeave hoo! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Tue Jul 26 1994 15:38 | 7 |
|
Just jack up the section you need to have replaced. 1/8" over
just to releave the pressure. Knock it out and put in the new section.
I assume your using 2 jacks, so place them about a 1/3 of the distance
from each end.
JD
|
148.19 | Just curious | TLE::PERIQUET | Dennis Periquet | Wed Jul 27 1994 16:36 | 9 |
|
re: "Jacking the house"
Does this mean that you are going to literally lift the house off of
the foundation (like you would a car off the ground)? This is an
interesting concept and would really be something to behold!
Dennis
|
148.20 | it aint the straw house for sure! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Thu Jul 28 1994 11:18 | 9 |
|
its nothing major Dennis. Your just jacking it up high enought to
take the pressure off the plate so it can be removed.
Now if you had seem me take out the first floor walls exterior walls
of my house and restud them. Them you might have seen something
of interest!
JD
|
148.21 | | WRKSYS::MORONEY | rearranger of rotating rust | Thu Jul 28 1994 14:22 | 8 |
| re .19:
If you think that's interesting you should see what was done to a cottage
next door to my father's. It was originally on footings that were
deteriorating. The whole place was jacked up about 5 feet and a complete
lower level/basement was added underneath it, now it's a 2 story house.
-Mike
|
148.184 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Apr 04 1995 17:39 | 12 |
| I'm going to be installing a steel door (standard casing) in a concrete
foundation opening - the opening is going to be expanded to fit a larger
(higher and wider) door). I expect to go the standard route of attaching
2x4s to the concrete and nailing the door to those - are there special
considerations I should be aware of? I saw a mention of the use of PT
lumber - is this required? The door won't be exposed to the weather.
Clearly I can't use big nails to attach the door, but I'd like some of the
anchoring to be into the foundation wall and not just the 2x4. What do I
use?
Steve
|
148.185 | PT will shrink! | GROOVE::DADDIECO | That's Just The Way It Is ..... | Tue Apr 04 1995 19:03 | 12 |
148.186 | steel frame | NOVA::MICHON | | Tue Apr 04 1995 19:53 | 14 |
| I had door cut / installed in my 12" block foundation.
I chose to go with a steel frame , steel door and
had it installed by a mason. The labor was $300.
That included cutting the opening under and
existing basement window. Installing the steel door
frame (cemented to the wall, its SUPER solid)
building a thresold/step and re-"stuccoing"
the exterior foundation.
I bought the steel door, 9 light insulated
with full steel jamb at arlwood in Woburn Ma.
This is not the cheap way to go...
|
148.187 | | HELIX::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Tue Apr 04 1995 19:55 | 5 |
| ...or else buy the pressure-treated wood in advance and let it sit
for about three months. I built a new back for my pickup truck out
of PT wood last year and the shrinkage was astounding. But, most
of the shrinkage occurred in the first few weeks, once it was out
in the sun all day.
|
148.188 | Something else to consider... | CUBIC7::CORRIGAN | LOOSE CHIPPINGS | Tue Apr 04 1995 20:06 | 12 |
| My advice would be to use the PT but to either build to allow
for shrinkage or see if you could find some PT that had a low
moisture content to begin with. Anyone you know have a moisture
meter?
Not only is PT known for it's decay resistance, but it is also
pest resistant. When buying my house the home inspection discovered
termites had chewed their way into the house through the walk-out
basement doorway(framed with untreated 2x) and had begun eating the
floor joists just inside the doorway.
FWIW
Bob
|
148.189 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Apr 04 1995 22:05 | 4 |
| Well, it seems a bit silly to use PT for the door when there's so much
non-PT wood on the sill, etc.
Steve
|
148.190 | Free advice, FWIW. | CUBIC7::CORRIGAN | LOOSE CHIPPINGS | Wed Apr 05 1995 11:53 | 6 |
| Not silly when you consider that my sill, etc., are a minimum of
four feet from ground contact but that the door frame is at ground
level making for much easier(and less visualy detectable) termite entry.
regards,
Bob
|
148.191 | one way | DAVE::MITTON | Windows in '95 | Wed Apr 05 1995 22:14 | 9 |
| I put a pre-hung steel door in my bulkhead entry.
I used PT wood and yes, it did shrink. I caulked the gap later.
I used a construction adhesive on the boards against the wall, (a
couple short boards wedged in the opening did the "clamping") then
drove some masonary nails thru the boards into the wall. Then attached
everything else to that.
Dave.
|
148.192 | Sealing first ? | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Thu Apr 06 1995 14:34 | 4 |
| Just a thought, but maybe sealing the PT before use might help
minimize the shrinkage.
Ray
|
148.193 | nail gun? | SMURF::WALTERS | | Thu Apr 06 1995 15:45 | 14 |
|
.14
That's a mistake that I already made!
One thing that might make the work go faster is to use a
powder-actuated nailer for fixing the frame to the concrete. Works
great for floor sleepers and framing.
Colin
|
148.194 | This might do the job: | VMSSPT::LYCEUM::CURTIS | Dick "Aristotle" Curtis | Tue Apr 11 1995 14:32 | 6 |
| Well, Steve, when I was putting in some storage, what I did was to
attatch PT 2x4s to the foundation using some lag bolts and anchors, and
attatched my racks to them. I don't think I had to countersink the
bolt heads, though, which would be necessary in your case.
Dick
|
148.322 | Sona Tube Foundation for 2-Story? | MKOTS3::HAHN | Technical Consulting Center | Thu Jun 29 1995 16:02 | 16 |
|
I'm at the "conceptual" stage of planning a two room addition to our home.
Originally, we were thinking of a one-story 24 x 16 addition. We're
leaning towards using piers / sona tubes for the foundation because of the
ledge on our property, and to help keep costs down. The existing house is
built on concrete piers, and has a crawl space.
After checking out our town's setback requirements, we need to reduce the
width from 24 ft. to 12 ft. Is building "up" an option when using sona tubes
as a foundation? Do sona tubes have the load bearing capacity to handle
a two-story 12 x 16 structure? The addition would be two bedrooms.
Thanks for any input!
Dave
|
148.323 | So I take it topic 2607 wasn't useful? | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, That Group | Thu Jun 29 1995 16:23 | 2 |
| 2607 CIMNET::GOSSELIN 1-SEP-1988 6 sona tubes vs foundation
1135 TWOBOS::LAFOSSE 14-MAY-1987 3 Sona tubes right up to joists, or use 4x4 posts?
|
148.324 | | HELIX::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Thu Jun 29 1995 16:29 | 11 |
| "It all depends." It depends on the diameter of the tubes, how many
you use, what kind of soil you're going into, what grade of concrete
it is, whether you put footings under the tubes, what size footings,
and probably a bunch of other stuff. I think you probably need to
get a structural engineer if you want a definitive answer.
I would guess that a competent structural engineer could come up with
a sonotube design that would work. Before you go that route though,
make sure you're going to save enough money to make it worth the
effort.
|
148.325 | Vertical cement crack along the foundation | WRKSYS::SHEN | | Mon Oct 23 1995 21:44 | 20 |
| Hi,
I found water in my basement floor last night. It looked like water sipped
through the basement cement floor (I always thought cement was a water-proof
thing before.). I have my friend checked the foundation area by the leaking
basement today. He found that there was a vertical crack line several
feet long along the foundation wall. My friend kept digging the soil following
the crack until he reached the basement floor-line. So the crack is
at least a floor high long.
Well, My guess is you buy some kind of water-proof cements and
seal up the crack (more digging until you see the end of the crack ?), right?
I thought I would post the message asking for some advices first.
Any suggestions and experience sharing will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
-Shuhua
|
148.326 | | TLE::OCCURS::BLATT | | Tue Oct 24 1995 00:08 | 53 |
| These should help. Helped me. I too found a leak in foundation wall this weekend.
Some of these are quite old, but probably still valid. 657 was helpful.
<<< 12DOT2::NOTES$STUFF:[NOTES$LIBRARY]HOME_WORK.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Home_work >-
================================================================================
Note 1111.12 Home_work keyword directory - see reply #1 for details 12 of 113
EVMS::PAULKM::WEISS "Trade freedom for security-los" 41 lines 27-OCT-1991 17:05
-< BASEMENT-WATERPROOFING >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Topic Repl Title
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
50 3 Vapor barrier under concrete floor or under sleepers?
149 4 Ventilating a crawl space
150 58 Water in the Basement ?
169 12 Help sealing outside from inside...
178 9 Basement sealer - bentonite
240 6 Water in basement
277 2 Wet spot on basement floor!
657 9 Foundation leak
662 22 Sump Pumps?
663 8 Fireplace leaking rain
664 1 Sump Pump Blues
665 3 Friday's water woes
671 11 I hate my basement!
779 1 City water with free ground water bonus
819 4 Water up through basement floor
893 35 New Build water in the basement. Help!!!
961 2 Need some information on bentonite.
987 8 Wet basements one more time...
996 4 The water table ???
1056 9 Sealing a bulkhead?
1107 14 Water problems - chimney and slab
1215 2 Seal a french Drain?
1349 12 New house & damp basement!!
1404 12 Bulkhead door leaking (formerly titled: "LEAK!")
1467 8 Water from sump pump - where should it go?
1503 6 Fountain in foyer
1515 3 Water-proofing a bulkhead
1516 23 Leaky foundation pins
1731 3 Sealing underground chamber
1896 1 Questions on a Hot Tub room
1926 0 DAMTITE sealant okay?
2165 19 Need advice for sump pump
2215 5 Water barrior in concrete floors
2280 61 Basement humidity - keeping it out?
2743 1 Porch leaking into Basement
2864 43 Concrete Sealing Recommendations?
2877 2 concrete slab puts water in house
3061 1 Flood Plane Foundations
3176 3 Crack in Sump Hole
|
148.327 | Cement is not waterproof.... | ASDG::CRIPPEN | | Tue Oct 24 1995 11:29 | 10 |
|
Just a comment, cement is not waterproof. Cement is a somewhat porous
agregate material and will absorb water rather readily. It can be
sealed with various products to close the pores and inhibit water
absorption.
A read through some of the notes mentioned in -.1 should help you
resolve your problem. Good luck....
Stu
|
148.328 | | HELIX::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Wed Oct 25 1995 12:16 | 4 |
| It sounds as though you're doing at least one thing right: you're
trying to fix the problem from the outside. You have a much better
chance of success. It's very difficult to patch a crack so it's
watertight from the inside.
|
148.329 | have to fix it from the outside for a finished basement | WRKSYS::SHEN | | Wed Oct 25 1995 20:05 | 4 |
| I have to do it from the outside because I have a finished basement.
I can not see the crack from the inside unless I tear down the walls.
-Shuhua
|
148.330 | Seems too simple, but... | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Thu Oct 26 1995 12:29 | 11 |
| Never underestimate the seemingly simple solutions. I terraced a
section right in front of my house and left the grade level. Prior to
this I never had any water in my basement, even under the worst
conditions. The next heavy rain I had a leak in the basement.
To fix it, all I did was regrade the slope away from the house and
the problem has never reoccured. By regrade, I mean that I took a shovel
and shoveled dirt up against the house and raked it so it sloped away from
the foundation.
Ray
|
148.331 | A simple stupid thing I did | WRKSYS::SHEN | | Thu Oct 26 1995 19:18 | 15 |
| You made a point.
I never had basement water problem before in the past 6 years.
This spring, I pulled out the big,old, deeply rooted wild grapes around
the cracked foundation area. I replaced that area with some shrubs this
summer and watered them frequently during the unusual dry summer
we just had. The new shrub area is tilted toward the foundation
due to the removal of the wild grapes near the foundation.
So I guess I made a stupid path for water to run heading toward the foundation.
Well, I guess I should pile up a lot of dirts against the house before it starts
raining this weekend.
-Shuhua
|
148.332 | The crack is right below a cellar window | WRKSYS::SHEN | | Thu Oct 26 1995 21:16 | 30 |
|
The crack is right below a basement window which is a pretty bad location
because the window is 1/2 above the ground and 1/2 below the ground.
There is a piece of aluminum barrier around that window forming a 1/2
circle between the aluminum barrier and the window. This means
the level inside of of the 1/2 circle is below the ground line.
The old wild grapes were rooted inside of that 1/2 circle section before.
After I pulling out the grapes, I pile up some rocks inside
of that 1/2 circle section. I guess I did several stupid things :
1. Pulled out the grapes.
2. Piled up the rocks in the 1/2 circle section.
3. Did not make the new landscaping area slope away from the house.
it is tilted toward the house because the removal of the grapes.
4. I don't have a dehumidifier in my basement, (I'll be getting one).
I could seal up the crack and pile up the dirts around the house to make it
slope away from the house. But I am not sure what to do with that 1/2 circle
section around the basement window. I am going to replace the rocks with dirts
up to the bottom of the window. But the cracked section will still be the lowest area
and vulnerable to the water problem.
Could anyone give me some ideas?
Thanks.
-Shuhua
|
148.333 | Let it pour! | TLE::PACKED::BLATT | | Fri Oct 27 1995 00:53 | 9 |
| I had the same exact problem in last weekend's rain. I have the same
window setup. I hadn't dug up any roots, but I did find that the dirt
butting up next to that aluminum half circle at the foundation was
pitching in quite a bit. So I added soil and sloped it a bit. Inside
the half circle it looks pretty level. I left that alone. Today
I went to Home Depot and for $6 and change I bought one of those plastic
window well covers.
I'm all set for the next big rainstorm!
|
148.334 | water, water everywhere.. | TEKVAX::KOPEC | we're gonna need another Timmy! | Fri Oct 27 1995 08:29 | 9 |
| I think you probably don't want to bring the dirt level in the window
well up to the window level; a good downpour and water will build up
and come in through the window. Rocks give you a little water-storage
to let things drain out, and also help keep vegetation from taking
root.
6" of rocks works well.
...tom
|
148.335 | Need help with crack!!! | WMOIS::CASTIGLIONE | | Fri Oct 27 1995 09:40 | 9 |
| I have a vertical crack that extends the whole length of the wall. I've
tried to seal from the inside with hydrolic (sp) cement but during real
heavy rain water is still seeping in. I would attempt to seal it from
the outside but the crack sits behind the front stairs and I can't get
to it unless I remove the stairs. Is there anything else I can do to
seal the crack up from thr inside?
Mark
|
148.336 | | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Fri Oct 27 1995 10:37 | 7 |
|
RE: .-1
Call in the pros... there are outfits that will come in and use a
special tool to inject a polymer material deep into the crack to
seal from the inside. Still not as reliable as sealing from the
outside... but a good alternative.
|
148.337 | | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Fri Oct 27 1995 11:30 | 11 |
| > to it unless I remove the stairs. Is there anything else I can do to
> seal the crack up from thr inside?
Go read the earlier questions and answers offered in this
conference from years ago. There's a pointer to these in the first
or second reply to this note.
Pay particular attention to note 657.*, It offers a suggestion that
has withstood the test of time and remains dry many years later.
Charly
|
148.338 | mastic caulk | SMURF::WALTERS | | Fri Nov 10 1995 13:14 | 15 |
|
A method similar to that mentioned in 657, except using
a waterproof mastic caulk such as phenoseal, and with a slight variation.
If the crack is narrow, chisel out a wider line, undercutting the
sides to form a key. Then drill directly into the crack with a masonry
bit every 3-4" along the line of the crack. Clean the dust
from the drill holes with a vacuum.
Use a caulking gun to force the mastic into the drill holes and it
will expand sideways into the crack along its whole length. Fill
the chiselled out channel up to the level of the concrete and it's
good for many years.
Colin
|
148.339 | removing efflouresence around crack | TLE::WENDYL::BLATT | | Fri Nov 10 1995 14:03 | 14 |
| I would like to remove the efflouresence (sp?) (white stuff) that has
built up around the crack in my wall.
I figure that monitoring efflouresence build-up is a good way to see
if it builds up again after having made some outdoor grading changes.
Any ideas how to get that off?
(btw, it is possible that the so-called "grand master" of house
inspectors --no names mentioned-- misstook the efflouresence for evidence
of sealing. I looked at my 3 yr old house inspection report and the
crack was noted with the commentary "sealed to prevent seepage".
not so!)
|
148.340 | muriatic acid | NOODLE::DEMERS | | Fri Nov 10 1995 15:32 | 1 |
| muriatic acid will do it
|
148.341 | LEXCEL | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Mon Nov 13 1995 11:25 | 23 |
|
Here's an opportunity to plug my all time favorite "caulk/sealant",
especially when using to seal cracks in basement, walls and floors:
"LEXCEL"
This stuff is fairly hard to find, I go to Moore's in Chelmsford
or Ayer (runs about $5.50 an tube). It's a clear sealant (comes
in a clear tube) that smells somewhat like airplane glue and is
incredibly tough and flexible. I found it when it was recommended
by a radon mitigator as "the best caulk for use with concrete".
I've used it for a lot of things, but it just (finally!) solved
my classic "pre-fab bulkhead leaking where it attaches to the
house" problem from the inside (I was dreading doing a fix from
the outside).
Follow the directions, work it with a finger dipped in soapy water
(otherwise, if it gets on you it STAYS on you).
- Mac
|
148.381 | replace stone foundation with poured?? | STAR::YURYAN | | Fri Feb 16 1996 17:59 | 4 |
| Is it possible to replace an old stone foundation, with a new poured
foundation without tearing down the house that sits on it ? And is it
possible to do it at a reasonable cost ?
|
148.382 | | EVMS::MORONEY | Never underestimate the power of human stupidity | Fri Feb 16 1996 20:27 | 18 |
| re .381:
Yes, or at least yes if you're willing to accept concrete block foundation.
There's a house in West Townsend that just got a concrete block foundation
under it (it's still jacked up), and I've seen it done twice before
(my grandfather's cottage, built early 60s but improper block foundation
plus frost heaving caused it to start collapsing. Foundation rebuilt early
80s. Also a summer cottage next door to my father's was originally on piers
with no basement. Piers were heaving causing the building to be rather
crooked. Fixing them lasted about 5 years. Owner then jacked existing
building 6 feet into the air, dug out under it and added a full finished
basement)
Fireplaces are a major complication (although they seem to be able to save
2 chimneys in the West Townsend house)
-Mike
|
148.383 | | HELIX::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/L31 Pole HJ33 | Mon Feb 19 1996 14:33 | 15 |
| Re: .381
Yes...although I suppose it depends on your definition of "reasonable
cost." I had Robert Miles of Marlboro do a section of my foundation
a few years ago. In my case it was a bit easier because most of
the foundation was above grade, but it's possible in any case. He
did a pretty good job, I thought, at a pretty reasonable price. I
thought he was somewhat of a rag-tag operation, but he got the job
done promptly and didn't seem to cut corners.
I'd get a couple of estimates, if possible. At the time, he was the
only guy I could find who would do it. Some contractors I called
seemed really spooked at the idea of jacking up a house and replacing
the foundation, but after watching it done I concluded that in fact
it's not all that hard if you know what you're doing.
|
148.384 | ...hold it right there.... | PCBUOA::TARDIFF | Dave Tardiff | Mon Feb 19 1996 19:11 | 25 |
|
I've just done this to a portion of my old house. Your
exact circumstances will affect the cost greatly. You do want to
find someone who's done this before - you don't want a rookie.
If it's an entire foundation, it's sometime simplest to lift
the entire house, replace the foundation, and put it back. Seems like
a lot of work, but it's not really too bad - just like moving the
thing without the horizontal vector. Much depends on the house, though.
In my case, I have an old farmhouse, vintage 1835. The main
house is 2/3rds on a 'full' stone-wall foundation, 1/3rd on a stone
walled crawl space. The original kitchen 'ell' was built by resting
the timber sills on a single row of rocks, resting on the dirt. About
15 years back, the owners expanded the ell (longer and wider and taller)
by digging a basement alongside it, supporting one edge with columns.
Unfortunately, over the years the original timbers, in contact with the
dirt below, had contracted terminal terminitus, so I had some work to
do...in short, we gutted the old structure, held up the newer surrounding
building with temporary shoring, removed the original 24' long wall,
poured a new footing and foundation in place, and built a new wall to
hold up the house. Got through all that with only minimal settling
to the second floor - I suspect a complete lift and replace would be
cleaner, especially if done by experienced workers. Check out house
movers - they know how to do it.
|
148.421 | [Looks like notesfile corrupted and this is now a ghost note] | VAXCPU::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Mon Dec 02 1996 21:05 | 63 |
148.422 | Replace/repair rotted foundation sill in old house? | VAXCPU::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Mon Dec 02 1996 21:05 | 63 |
148.423 | I'd use epoxy to fill | PERFOM::MATTHES | | Tue Dec 03 1996 11:49 | 10 |
148.424 | One thought | FOUNDR::DODIER | Double Income, Clan'o Kids | Tue Dec 03 1996 15:38 | 17 |
148.425 | minwax hardener and filler excellent | CPEEDY::BRADLEY | Chuck Bradley | Tue Dec 03 1996 16:42 | 25
|