T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4.1 | | SSVAX::SARAO | | Sun Dec 01 1985 02:05 | 4 |
| I do see your point... But in some cases, it is necessary to do that.
I've seen that show a couple of times...Is it on regularly on PBS ?
Robert
|
4.2 | | TONTO::EARLY | | Mon Dec 02 1985 13:44 | 19 |
| re: .0
Even OHJ which I refer to frequently, has a very nice and short section
which addresses the viewpoint of ".. remuddling" as opposed to a tastefull
remodelling.
Several magazines I've looked over also cover the point of "building a new
house within the shell of an old house", particularly like the "Better
Homes and Garden".
I think the "what" someone does with their old house is matter of personal
taste. It would be both impossible and impractical (as well as very expensive)
to totally "restore" my house, but I think a "practical" and "tasteful"
restoration is very plausible and doable, since the brunt of the "cost"
will be my personal labor.
Bob
|
4.3 | | GUMDRP::PIERMARINI | | Mon Dec 02 1985 15:19 | 14 |
|
It is true that restoring and remodeling have two different
meanings but that doesn't mean that you can't do both... the are some
things in an old home that restoring would be prefered such as woodwork
door casings etc. but some things certainly are not! such as horse hair
plastered walls, some types of lighting and why would you restore a wall?
put in insulation and sheetrock and call it remodeled!! so what!
I watch this old house almost every week and agree that they don't
always know what there doing and Bob Vila sure is arrogant! on the other
hand Old house journal doesn't have all the answers either and it's not free!
paul
|
4.4 | | OLIVER::MEDVECKY | | Mon Dec 09 1985 15:42 | 9 |
| I don't know who your "caution" is geared for but I will agree with all
the responses so far. Seems to me people who are going to do major work/
rework will decide for themselves if they want to "restore" or rebuild,
and this decision will certainly include cost of the project. Ive
watched the program on occasion and Ive seen them duplicate tiles made
years ago and the cost to me certainly doesnt seem to be worth it. But
for those who want originality, I suppose it has its price.
Rick
|
4.5 | | EIFFEL::CLARK | | Wed Dec 11 1985 21:58 | 6 |
| I think that the major difference between renovation and restoration is
attitude, not cost. I usually find little cost difference between choosing
materials/techniques/etc. that are in keeping with the character of the
house or are radical departures.
-- Ward
|
4.6 | | AIEIO::FARRELL | | Mon Dec 30 1985 19:20 | 5 |
|
Also, in most cases the rennovations/restorations done in This Old House
are in the $$Big Buck$$ league.
|
4.7 | | WILLIE::TIMMONS | | Wed Feb 26 1986 18:44 | 26 |
| Just found this notefile, so I'm late.
TOH i, to me, very informative regarding the "how to". Norm Abrams,
the master carpenter, tries to offer tips regarding all types of
work. Unfortunately, I think he is rushed and not enough detail
of certain jobs is given.
Earlier, this program was excellent in regards to actual work.
Now, they tend to branch off into other areas, such as new home-styles,
factory-built, etc. I find these informative, but I don't intend
to build another house, so I watch these portions for interest in
new things only, not application.
In the North Shore are, Channel 2 carries the show each week until
the series runs out, Thurs. evening. It is also repeated on Sat,
and Channel 11 (Durham. N.H.) repeats the same show on Sunday, 11
A.M., I believe.
Vila is sometimes arrogant, but he drives me crazy with his touching
and tapping EVERYTHING!!
All in all, I enjoy the show and hope it continues.
There's another good show on Channel 11, A House For All Seasons.
Lee
|
4.8 | A House for all Seasons | OZ::DAHLSTROM | | Fri Feb 28 1986 19:48 | 1 |
| What day and time is "A House For All Seasons" on channel 11?
|
4.9 | | Q::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum | Sat Mar 01 1986 23:31 | 3 |
| re. house for all seasons
On channel 11, sometime Saturday morning, 11 maybe?
|
4.10 | twice a week | PICA::HIDER | Paul Hider | Sun Mar 02 1986 01:20 | 3 |
|
Ch 11 WENH Durham NH Thursday 7:30pm Sunday 11:00am
Ch 2 WGBH Boston MA Thursday 7:30pm Saturday 6:00pm
|
4.11 | | SERPNT::SONTAKKE | Vikas Sontakke | Sun Mar 02 1986 02:03 | 10 |
|
This Old House:-
Ch 11 WENH Durham NH Thursday 7:30pm Sunday 11:00am
Ch 2 WGBH Boston MA Thursday 7:30pm Saturday 6:00pm
House For All Seasons:-
Ch 11 WENH Durham NH Sunday 10:30am
Ch 2 WGBH Boston MA Saturday 10:30am
|
4.12 | | AVOID::PAPPAS | Jim Pappas | Thu May 01 1986 02:00 | 47 |
| Here is your chance to tape the old editions of "This Old House"
Write to WGBH and let them know you want to see it. A few summers
ago, WGBH played TOH reruns every morning. I have a couple of episodes
on tape and would love to get the rest (I have the Wouburn 50's
ranch and the Arlington house in case anyone is interested).
I have tried to tape the regular series on several occasions but I
always seem to miss an episode after a week or two. Taping every day
works because my attention span is just long enough to set up the VCR
one day in advance.
The following extracted from the Video notes file.
Jim Pappas
<<< DSSDEV::PUBLIC$:[NOTES$LIBRARY]VIDEO.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Videophile Forum >-
================================================================================
Note 599.0 TV Worth Taping No replies
TLE::LIONEL "Steve Lionel" 24 lines 29-APR-1986 15:14
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is from the May issue of Dial magazine, sent out by WGBH, Channel
2, the Boston PBS outlet:
TV Worth Taping
Remember the days before VCRs? How many Channel 2 special shows
from back then would you like to have taped? Well, we're about
to give you a second chance.
Starting in June, following the conclusion of the Channel 2 Auction,
WGBH will be scheduling late-night re-broadcasts of viewer-suggested
programs from the past, specifically slated for your VCR viewing
pleasure. Set the timer, go to bed, and wake up with Liberace.
Or Maria Callas. Or even Leo Buscaglia!
Of course, some shows are no longer available to us because of lapsed
rights (Brideshead and past Masterpiece Theatre offerings, for
example), but there's a wealth of quality television you're sure
to want to request. In the Kingdom of the Dolphins? Starring
Katherine Hepburn? Big Band Cavalcade? Let us know.
Mail your requests for this new VCR-aimed service to: VCR Programming,
WGBH Broadcast Department, 125 Western Avenue, Boston 02134. And
watch for further details in the June Dial.
|
4.13 | NOT HAPPY WITH "THIS OLD HOUSE" | MTBLUE::BAUKS_ROSE | | Fri Feb 06 1987 01:25 | 6 |
| HELLO, I'VE JUST BOUGHT AN OLD HOUSE IN OAKLAND, MAINE AND I LOVE
IT. I REALLY ENJOY THIS SUBJECT AND I TOTALLY AGREE THAT THIS OLD
HOUSE IS NOT THE SHOW IT'S CRACKED UP TO BE...SO MANY TIMES I'VE
WATCHED IT HOPING TO SEE A HOUSE RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL FLAVOR
AND END UP SEEING A NEW DEVELOPMENT HOUSE INSTEAD...HOW DISSAPPOINTING!
OH, WELL, THAT'S JUST MY THOUGHTS...
|
4.14 | Never should have built that New House | CAM1::BLESSLEY | Life's too short for boring food | Thu Feb 12 1987 19:31 | 7 |
| This Old House has changed a lot over the several years it has run. It used to
be a true "DIY" show. No trips to sawmills or to see pre-fab homes in
Scandinavia. The end of that era was the season that they built a new house.
It hasn't been the same since.
-scott
|
4.762 | This odl house | AKOV04::KALINOWSKI | | Wed Mar 11 1987 15:34 | 40 |
|
While reading a couple of great tips today, I started thinking
of how handy this notes file really is. I mean it is a true networking
of information, plus it uses computers! I think all of us have learned
something really handy that made a project go easier, saved us some
money or grief, or helped us keep a contractor honest.
While watching this old house last week, I was shocked. In this
episode, they are rebuilding an old adobe house in Arizona. Out
of the blue up walks good ol Norm the carpenter. Must be time to
leave New England for a spell to beat the cold. Anyways, Bob has
a question for Norm. He is trying to skirt a building code when
making a change to the a ceiling that is too low going up some stairs.
Bob shows the problem to Norm and asks "Got any ideas how to get
around this one?" to which Norm replys "Nope, looks like your stuck".
Norm without an answer? I couldn't fathom it! Norm always has the
answer.
Anyway, I was just thinking about this conference. I mean imagine
good ol Norm saying "beats me, but let me get back to you". The next
week Norm whips out this 3 foot long listing saying he cranked the
question into the DIGITAL homework notes file, and the folks at DEC
have 5 possible solutions, and one questions as to why they are
not adding a terminal den as part of the project! Scary isn't it?
We take so much for granted in this business, yet this sideline
activity to test notes is really an advanced communications process
the scientists have been forcasting for years. I just wanted to
say thanks for all the neat questions and great ideas I have seen
out there. I used to be scared silly doing anything to my humble
abode, but now, I know I've got hundreds of experts with nothing
to personaly gain answering my most trivial or tough question.
thanks folks
john
|
4.763 | I'LL SECOND THAT | ANTARE::SUSEL | | Wed Mar 11 1987 15:39 | 7 |
| I'll second that!
I'LL SECOND THAT AGAIN!
THANKS EVERYONE!
Bruce
|
4.764 | Is it safe? | TALLIS::SAMARAS | Advanced Vax Engineering LTN | Wed Mar 11 1987 16:24 | 4 |
| I just hope all of this valuable info gets backed up!
...bill
|
4.15 | 3 hour "Old House" Special | USSCSL::PASCUCCI | | Fri Sep 18 1987 15:46 | 6 |
| For those interested I saw an advertisemnt for a Special, 3 hours,
of "This Old House" scheduled for Saturday the 19th in this mornings
paper. I cut it out to include here but forgot it at home. I think
it begins at 3:00 pm. It will be on you local PBS station.
|
4.27 | This Old House video any good? | TFH::DONNELLY | Take my advice- Don't listen to me | Tue Nov 17 1987 21:29 | 15 |
|
Has anybody out there forked out the $25 for the latest 'This Old House'
video? It covers decks and patios.
Is it worth $25. Is it at least fun to watch? Is it worth buying as an
X-mas present? Are videos in general any good at instruction?
I suspect books are cheaper and more thorough and I'm hesitant to gamble
the $25 to prove myself right or wrong.
Craig
p.s. (i know this should go in the wanted area)
If someone's already got one I'd consider buying it.
or maybe just borrowing it?
|
4.28 | before Norm gained weight | MILRAT::HAMER | the teflon noter | Wed Nov 18 1987 12:35 | 16 |
| I borrowed the TOH video from the public library.
I'm neither a magician nor artist with tools and materials but I found
the tape v-e-r-y elementary.
The part on making a brick walk was interesting and I think I learned
a couple of things I hadn't known before. The deck was a very small
one, more like a big porch, a step above grade and simple
straightforward (unlike any home improvement project I have ever been
related to :-(). The rest was too basic to be of much help to me.
For a first-time rookie homeowner with more than the usual allotment
of thumbs, it might be useful as a present. If it were for me,
however, I'd prefer a decently illustrated how-to book.
John H.
|
4.29 | Hometime | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Auhhhhh, I've been slimed! | Thu Nov 19 1987 21:26 | 5 |
| I have seen videos for sale at Spag's for around $8 in the School
house. They were put out by Hometime. There were several different
tapes covering plumbing, electrical, decks, etc. I haven't seen any
of them but if this is the same outfit that produced the Hometime
public TV show, they should be pretty good.
|
4.30 | utter crap | HPSVAX::POWELL | Reed Powell (HPS/LCG Marketing | Wed Nov 25 1987 13:29 | 17 |
| Can you spell J - U - N - K ??? Better buy (also at spags) is
to spend the $10 instead on 2 blank tapes - you get more for your
money.
Obviously I bought one of these little hummers - the one on FINISH
CARPENTRY. What a joke. First there are the truck commercials
(no crap, this is not a joke); I guess that is how they keep down
the costs. The tape is narrated by Mr and Ms DIY. Think they shows
the intricacies of doing Colonial Casing on doors and windows?
Nope - they just used square lumber with butt joints! The did use
clamshell around the floor, but went real fast over the parts they
should ahve spent time on if this was a serious 'teaching' video
- things like how to do coping, for instance.
Not a recommendation from my point of view.
-reed
|
4.31 | "addition" tape ? | MSEE::CHENG | | Mon Dec 07 1987 11:42 | 7 |
| Is there any video tape on " building addition " ? I'm planning
to build ( hire contractor ) a 16 x 32 addition to extend the living
room to double the size and add a 4th bed room. I just want to be
prepared so that I can talk intelligently to the contractor when
the time comes. If anyone has tapes regarding this topic, I would
like to borrow it, if I may. Thanks.
|
4.32 | ch. 11 show taped | MPGS::ROGUSKA | | Mon Dec 14 1987 17:38 | 12 |
| Somewhere, someone, asked if anyone had taped the recent
This Old House segment that was broadcasted on the N.H.
channel 11. I have a copy of this broadcasted, and I have
the ability to make copies of the tape - I'll even edit out
the fund raising breaks. So if you are still looking for it
send me mail (MPGS::ROGUSKA).
I think this is six half hours episodes, it the remodeling of
the kitchen in an old home.
Kathy
|
4.33 | Drywall tape not bad for beginners | KELVIN::RPALMER | Half a bubble off plumb | Thu Dec 17 1987 11:27 | 7 |
| I just bought the Home Time video on drywall for $9. While
not the greatest it did have some info that I found valuable. I
know very little about tape and seaming and my wife knows even less
so we had a lot to learn. I'll second the opinion that the Chevy
truck ads were annoying.
=Ralph=
|
4.67 | This Old (expensive) House | ARCHER::FOX | | Mon Feb 15 1988 16:05 | 17 |
| This last project on "This Old House" has really amazed me. I have
never seen so much money spent on a TOH project! It seems any time
they uncover something, like the lack of a hearth under the floor,
or the sad shape of the just about every piece of load-bearing
lumber thruout each building, it more money. How about the stone
wall that was built - $5000! Let's not forget about that wellhead.
Bring in 2 restoration experts so they can salvage a couple of
old boards! What did *that* run them? How about the fancy paint
and stencilling work that's being done? What happened to owner-
participation?
I can't wait for this Thursday to see the final bill.
Anyone care to guess what that total might be? Just the
improvements now, not anything to do with the original purchase
price. My guess is $150K. Is it nice? Yes. Is it worth it? Maybe.
Could they sell tommorow and get it all back? Doubtful.
John
|
4.68 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Feb 15 1988 16:12 | 9 |
| What about that textured *ORANGE* living room wall! After spending
megabucks for an exact custom-color-matched restoration of the outside
of the house to its original colors, they paint the living room
in a color and style that would NEVER, EVER have been used in an
18-century farmhouse!!! Worse, I bet that texturing they did with
the plastic bag will leave enough of an uneven surface so it will
be impossible to paint over it without the texture showing through.
I wonder whose bright idea that one was?
|
4.69 | no $$$ | LEPAGE::LEPAGE | | Mon Feb 15 1988 16:17 | 4 |
| I bet that we don't see ANYTHING about the cost of this boondoggle!
-Mark
|
4.70 | Nice fake well sound, though ... | TRACTR::WHITNEY | | Mon Feb 15 1988 16:36 | 11 |
| My guess is closer to $200K.
I definitely agree about the wierd interior finish choices. The
stippling was a neat trick to hear about, though... A particular
item that set me off was the bold striped wallpapers. Is that supposed
to be traditional? Even the interior decimator agreed with what's
his name that it was "bold". The best part about the last episode
was the part where they show the fake well; nothing inside the
wellhouse but a little pump to simulate the noise of a real well.
What!?!?!?
|
4.71 | | MYVAX::DIAMOND | Not one of the Beasty Boys | Mon Feb 15 1988 16:50 | 16 |
|
I say $300k minimum.
I thought they did some real stupid things, just to keep the house
authentic (this isn't like restoring a antique car). A few episodes
back they were restoring the windows. They tried to preserve the
glass in the windows, because it looked authentic because of the
waves in it. Everything in restoring the windows had to be custom
made. Even the tools. If it were mine, I'd just knock all the windows
out, and put in traditional looking windows by Marvin. These would
be double or trippled pained. I think the windows cost in the
nieghborhood of 1-2k each, depending upon how much work had to be
done.
Mike
|
4.72 | big $$$'s | KLAATU::BERUBE | Claude G. Berube | Mon Feb 15 1988 16:50 | 12 |
|
Based on someone in my group who lives nearby, and saw a report in the
local paper (maybe the Globe?) about the finish product. The cost were
something like this, (note sure but this is what I remember, and would
believe, since I doubt all work performed was shown and not all the
prices were quoted on the show, and I saw all the installments)
250K Original purchase
150K Owner contributed to renovation (original budget 100K)
200K+ Donated by TOH (mostly Manufacturers vending their wares)
Claude
|
4.73 | A couple of cold ones | MAGIC::COTE | | Mon Feb 15 1988 17:25 | 32 |
| I think they spent more on this last house than they did on the
Bigelow (might be the wrong name) House in Newton. That was the
huge summer house that was converted into 5 condos.
There were three things about this latest job that really stand
out in my mind. 1) Asbestos removal, talk about making a project
out of something, 2) the guys who hung and skim coated the blue
board were not Canadians, and 3) $5000 for those stone walls...
Everytime I saw the owner all I could think of was "Die Yuppie Scum"
bumper stickers.
There was a lot of information in this episode on a variety of things,
but they didn't go into anything deep enough (except things like
the well head, asbestos removal, and rebuilding old windows.
Just thought of another highlight of this job, in one of the early
shows the owner is busting his butt in his oxford shirt doing some
heavy demolition and it's about 5 in the afternoon. Bob and Norm
tell the guy that there plenty of light left and that he should
move these boulders and other things out of the area that the next
day's work will be in. Then they tell the guy that they're headed
off to "grab a couple of cold ones".
Remember when Norm was skinny???? I just love to watch Norm drive
a nail and miss.
Sorry for venting, but TOH is getting old.
BC
|
4.74 | Hints and Allegations | CALVA::WOLINSKI | uCoder sans Frontieres | Mon Feb 15 1988 17:57 | 0 |
4.75 | gifts, donations, the IRS | LEE2::SEETON | | Mon Feb 15 1988 21:36 | 7 |
| re: .5 Yeah, I was wondering just how the IRS might be looking
at those "donations" == "gifts". Hey, at least they
have it documented !
Restoration ? Not even by looking in the "well"
Lee
|
4.76 | Money makes the World go Around | ENUF::LANOUE | | Tue Feb 16 1988 12:27 | 9 |
| Another expensive item(s) was the custom made shutters by the guy
in upstate N.H. I bet those cost $200/pair and they had what 20
windows???? I read the article in the Herald and you will not see
the home owners again nor will you see the final cost.... I wonder
what are they doing next rebuilding the White House?????????????????
Don
|
4.77 | | ULTRA::PRIBORSKY | That's the stuff dreams are made of. | Tue Feb 16 1988 13:15 | 2 |
| I'll guess they've got over $300K above the original $250K purchase
price into the place.
|
4.78 | A similar Ending.. | MEMORY::FARRELL | Joe Farrell, ESD Methods, SHR01-3/020 | Tue Feb 16 1988 13:54 | 6 |
| I figure this house/project will go the same route as the "vacation home"
built last season in Brimfield,Mass. That project started out as a simple
weekend retreat and turned into a "palace" to put it mildly. And the final
price was never discussed...
/Joef
|
4.79 | I don't even have sash weights! | STRATA::RUDMAN | Blame it on Butch Cavendish! | Tue Feb 16 1988 16:26 | 8 |
| re: .6 You may have been venting, but it was entertaining as Hell.
The best DIY how-too I saw in the show so far is the replacement
of the sash weight cords. What else besides the windows & the boulders
did the owner do himself? (Probably thinks he's a home handy-man
now.)
Don
|
4.80 | Work - Work - Work | ENUF::LANOUE | | Tue Feb 16 1988 18:18 | 7 |
| According to "BUD MAN" Norm and and BOB he and some friends did
the rest of the lathe work for the Balustrades on the Deck. I figure
they must of spent 1 hour to 1 1/2 each and there were 60 some-odd of
them. Another point made in the Herald article is that they (the
owners) did not want because there too ornate and will probably
tear them out after the final taping of the show.
|
4.81 | must be nice to have bucks | DELNI::HANDEL | | Wed Feb 17 1988 18:25 | 11 |
|
I clearly recall Bob Vila saying that the the cost of the original
house was $150k. You've got to figure that these people are
wealthy or something to be able to afford half this stuff! About
the last show, the wallpaper one - the paint effects were great,
but I didn't like any of the wallpaper - especially the "nursery"
with that terribly bold pattern. If I were a baby, I'd cry going
into that room!!! I also thought that the marbling was nice, but
the salmon veins were too large. Does anyone else have any comments
on the practicality of stippling?
|
4.82 | an all-too-brief showing of normalcy | PSTJTT::TABER | Eunuchs are a trademark of AT&T | Wed Feb 17 1988 18:53 | 9 |
| I was impressed by the wall-papering episode because it was the ONLY one
where someone said, "Well, we're doing it this way because it's less
expensive." Up to that point, it seemed like the idea was to find the
priciest method available.
As for the paint and glaze... I don't think I could handle having a
house with a room the color of a VMS manual.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
4.83 | Sorry, I belive the cost was $250k | FREDW::MATTHES | | Wed Feb 17 1988 19:21 | 9 |
| re .14
I clearly recall Bob saying that the price of the house was 250k.
Not as clearly was the GUESStimates of the restoration. I seem
to recall from the deep abcesses of my mind somewhere between 50
and 100k as a rough guess.
The re-runs for this one are going to be fun to watch.
|
4.84 | Why wait for the reruns | SEESAW::PILANT | L. Mark Pilant | Wed Feb 17 1988 22:58 | 8 |
| RE: .16
Y'know Fred, I won't even have to wait 'till the reruns. I
have the whole series (except maybe the first episode) on tape.
It'll be fun to watch & laugh at.
- Mark
|
4.85 | TOH does seem to be getting old | VLNVAX::SUMNER | Senility has set in | Thu Feb 18 1988 01:08 | 21 |
|
Re .14 Who said stippling was practical? My wife (the art major)
has heard of the process so I guess it's been around
for a while though.
I saw the article (Patriot Ledger I think) and the
producer of TOH had several *interesting* comments about
the project. The original figure for owner contribution
was projected at about 70k and most of the overruns
were caused by the yuppies changing thier minds. The
previously stated figures of 250k (house), 150k (owners)
and 200k (TOH) sound about right. When the yuppies
started complaining about costs TOH offered to buy the
house from them (TOH figured it was now worth 750k +/-),
those slobs shutup in a hurry.
Glenn
|
4.86 | We highly paid engineers are at the LOW end of their audience | STAR::SWIST | Jim Swist ZKO1-1/D42 381-1264 | Thu Feb 18 1988 12:40 | 12 |
| PBS is more commercial than it likes to admit. The ch 2 audience
is very high-end - just looking at the ads in their monthly magazine
will give you an idea of who their important audience is - it's
the people with the big bucks who are big donors.
That crowd isn't interested in a $10K addition to a vanilla 3-br cape in
some nondescript suburb.
There are some rumors around as to what the GBH in their call letters
stand for. Some say it's "Great Blue Hill". But the cynics say
it's really "God Bless Harvard".
|
4.87 | | MYVAX::DIAMOND | Not one of the Beasty Boys | Thu Feb 18 1988 17:38 | 9 |
|
I heard that the house cost about 250k also. My previous guess of
$300k was above and beyond the 250k. So after averything is done
that house will have cost them $550k (my guess). I'll move back
to Upstate Ny where I can buy a brand new house that large an luxrious
for about $200k.
Mike
|
4.88 | What did they offer? | PSTJTT::TABER | Eunuchs are a trademark of AT&T | Thu Feb 18 1988 18:10 | 9 |
| > When the yuppies
> started complaining about costs TOH offered to buy the
> house from them (TOH figured it was now worth 750k +/-),
> those slobs shutup in a hurry.
Did they offer the $750k? Or just offer to give them back the $250k the
owners originally paid? If the latter, I'd have run Bob through the air
shredder by way of refusal. :-)
>>>==>PStJTT
|
4.89 | The End | LEPAGE::LEPAGE | | Fri Feb 19 1988 10:50 | 11 |
| Well, the final episode of 'This Old Black Hole' aired last night.
Bob didn't go into any detail, but stated that the original estimate
for work was about 100K, and the actual price came to about 200K.
Norm added that the additional $$$ were due to the enormous amount
of structural work that had to be done, along with things like the
5(!) bathrooms, etc.
All-in-all a truly classic TOH! (Said with MUCH tongue-in-cheek).
-Mark
|
4.90 | Must of been a design by comittee | KLAATU::BERUBE | Claude G. Berube | Fri Feb 19 1988 11:26 | 13 |
| Since last nights episode was set up prior to a Magazine shoot (Better
Homes I think they said) I wonder how many of the Drape's, antiques
furniture, throw rug's etc. were left after the shoot?
When all was said and done, the wife and I look at each other and said
after all thet $'s that's what it look like? We felt it was a loosy
interior design, althought we did like the exterior looks. I can't
beleive the wallpaper in the Nursery/Old Kitchen or the Red glaze in
the sitting room or whatever it was called, no wonder the owner's
wanted five bathrooms, If I lived in that house, I'd be releiving
myself a lot ;^).
Claude
|
4.91 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Feb 19 1988 11:41 | 7 |
| So I heard the number 5 correctly re: bathrooms. Good grief! It's
not *THAT* big a house!!!
I agree with Calude's opinion of the interior decoration. The bold
wallpaper in the nursery with a STRIPED floor/rug?!? The red/orange
walls in the living room would be appropriate for a New Orleans
whorehouse, but a New England farmhouse living room?!?
|
4.92 | Not Impressed | SALEM::PAGLIARULO | | Fri Feb 19 1988 11:49 | 10 |
| I agree with the previous two replies. All that $$ for that result.
Anyone know if, for the most part the owner's wanted it that way,
or did TOH do the design.
My wife suscribes to the magazine that was doing the shooting.
According to her usually they bring in all that stuff and take it
out later. I'll let you know what it looks like when teh article
comes out.
George
|
4.93 | Don't forget the "guests" | AKOV75::CRAMER | | Fri Feb 19 1988 12:17 | 7 |
| re: 5 bathrooms
Remember, from the digression in the shower note, that the owners
are planning on turning the joint into a bed & breakfast place.
5 bathrooms make alot more sense that way, no?
Alan
|
4.94 | totals out to $650K | FREDW::MATTHES | | Fri Feb 19 1988 12:24 | 20 |
| The wife and I are going to stop by this spring sometime and see
if we can take a look. I'll bet you the mortgage on the house that
all that decorating was ripped out immediately following the shoot.
With 5 bathrooms maybe it will be a bed and bath.
The wrap up at the end - $100k doubled due to more structural
renovation than originally thought. That puts it at:
$250 k original cost
200 k renovations
200 k materails donated (they did not mention that)
-------
650 K
They did mention something about the fact that the homeowners "would
have liked to do more but were not able to." whatever that is supposed
to mean.
Bed and bath - maybe the mention of the whorehouse wasn't that far
off.
|
4.95 | Alarm those guests! | POP::SUNG | A waste is a terrible thing to mind | Fri Feb 19 1988 12:29 | 6 |
| It's a wonder why they installed that fancy alarm system for a bed
and breakfast. Looks like it cost a bundle. My wife and I didn't
think the pedestal sinks fit in at all in those bathrooms, especially
next to the claw foot tub. Nice stove though!
-al
|
4.96 | Wrong furniture in sitting room. | TOLKIN::GUERRA | ARRIVE ALIVE, DON'T DRIVE | Fri Feb 19 1988 12:41 | 4 |
| That sitting room with the orange/red walls has the wrong furniture
in it. It calls for a few tables and chairs, a bar and mirrors.
Like someone said in an earlier note, it looks like it belongs in
a different "type" of house.
|
4.97 | Lifestyles of the REAL upper middle class... | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Fri Feb 19 1988 13:38 | 13 |
|
Re: The 5 bathrooms
I had a friend in Santa Monica, who came from a fairly well off
family (father taught C.S. at UCLA plus did DoD-type consulting).
They had a reasonably sized 4+ bedroom house on a very small lot.
Master Bedroom has Jacuzzi, large vanity, toilet, double shower, bidet.
Another Bedroom has a private full bath attached, also.
There is a full bath accessable from the upstairs hallway.
The maid's room (downstairs) has a private full bath attached.
There is a half bath accessable from the downstairs hallway.
|
4.98 | I counted 4 not sure of 5th | KLAATU::BERUBE | Claude G. Berube | Fri Feb 19 1988 13:43 | 21 |
| As to the 5 bath's, I can account for 4 of them, they are as follow's
1 is off to the side of the familly room in the new section, I
remember Norm talking about a new design to that bump out section
since the door wouldn't fit. (this is supposed to be a half bath
and wash room if memory serve's right)
3 of them were shown in last night's episode
The half bath down stairs in the original house
The full bath upstair's with the old (and stained) clawed
bathtub next to the nursery
The master bath, Bob had the nerve to ask the Interior
decorated what he thought of the vanity.
As to the fifth one, I don't know, maybe it next to the well head?
I also agree to an earlier note, the pedestal sink doesn't fit in with
the old house, and nether do the toilet's.
Claude
|
4.99 | Glad it's over ... | TOOK::ARN | | Fri Feb 19 1988 13:54 | 11 |
| When you watch the rerun of the show, check out the dining room
wallpaper. It stops on one wall, underneath the window. Either they
ran out or this is a new decorating technique.
Is a family actually supposed to live in this house? I didn't see
one room where I could be comfortable in. And if there were five
bathrooms and supposedly other rooms, why didn't they show them.
I'll have to check it out in Country Home when it comes out.
Tim
|
4.100 | | MYVAX::DIAMOND | Not one of the Beasty Boys | Fri Feb 19 1988 14:34 | 9 |
|
I read an article about TOH once. They said that they do donate
some labor and materials to the show. But it is still up to the
owners to be able to pay for it. They won't even start the project
unless the owners show they can afford it. And the price they quote
is the final price. TOH may pay for it. There is no gurantee.
Mike
|
4.101 | Another DIY show? | HPSMEG::LUKOWSKI | I lost my A$$ in the '87 CRASH! | Fri Feb 19 1988 15:31 | 16 |
| Has anyone seen the pseudo-DIY show 'State of the Architecture'?
I found it by accident on a cable channel last night (Tempo). Talk
about low budget and a lot of advertising... Every segment displayed
the advertiser's name on the screen. They did not stop anyone from
working while they were taping so you had to listen to them over
the sounds of hammers, saws, etc.. In one segment, they were discussing
tile installation in a bathroom. The two guys discussing it were
talking about the guy inside that was performing the installation but
the lighting was so inadequate that the bathroom appeared totally
dark and you couldn't even see the guy inside. I certainly wouldn't
recommend that anyone watch this, but after seeing this, T.O.H. isn't
so bad. In next weeks episode, they will be installing aluminum
cedar shakes made by Alcoa.
-Jim
|
4.102 | DIY Show Alternatives | TRACTR::WHITNEY | | Fri Feb 19 1988 15:46 | 0 |
4.103 | Hometime,good show,but realistic? | TOOK::ARN | | Fri Feb 19 1988 16:08 | 10 |
| You are referring to "Hometime". It's the show where they put up
a deck in an afternoon, and neither of them sweat or get dirty through
the whole affair. And they never get mad at each other either. I
don't think they are married. If you look in the credits they have
different names. I know this doesn't mean much anymore but if they
were, the dialogue would be different. 'Honey, could you hand me
the hammer?'. 'What hammer dear, I don't have the hammer'. 'The
one right next to you !'. 'I don't see it !!'. 'THE ONE RIGHT BY
YOUR FEET, WHAT ARE YOU %&*%$# BLIND !!!'. 'I DON'T KNOW WHY YOU
DIDN'T HAVE SOMEONE COME AND DO THIS !!'. etc.,etc.
|
4.104 | Have you been eavesdropping on us ?!?! | FDCV14::DUNN | Karen Dunn 223-2651 | Fri Feb 19 1988 16:13 | 1 |
|
|
4.105 | Hometime | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Auhhhhh, I've been slimed! | Fri Feb 19 1988 16:26 | 14 |
| RE: .35
The show you remember is called Hometime and the new season started
a few weeks ago. In the Mass area its on channel 11 on Sunday mornings
at 9:30 and then at 12:00 pm on channel 2. Also Saturdays, channel
2 at 2:30 pm. I like it a lot more than TOH. They do sometimes
forget to show important aspects of projects. One episode on decks
started with the 2x10 's already lag bolted to the house. No mention
of flashing or things to consider. They then said that they were
going to cantilever the deck and that required "special" fasteners
which they would show later. Later never came. But it still miles
ahead of TOH.
Phil
|
4.106 | Other Shows... | MEMORY::FARRELL | Joe Farrell, ESD Methods, SHR01-3/020 | Fri Feb 19 1988 16:52 | 15 |
|
There also used to be the DIY (Do it yourself) show on USA, aired Saturday
mornings about 10:30am. Show ran for 1/2 hour and the couple in the show
did all the work, and they did get their hands dirty. There's also
"Great Adventures in Remodeling" on TNN (Nashville Network) that runs on
Saturdays at 10:30am. Similar in content to the DIY show. This show usually
has 3 projects during it's 1/2 hour run. Last week they installed a new
garage door,opener, and repainted an in-ground pool.
RE: This old house
The next project is out in California somewhere. Probably the
remodeling of an entire city.....
/Joef
|
4.107 | RE: B&B | MEMORY::FARRELL | Joe Farrell, ESD Methods, SHR01-3/020 | Fri Feb 19 1988 16:55 | 11 |
|
RE: This old house as a Bed and Breakfast
The owners will find that they will have to register their
B&B as a "hotel" and pay all the wonderful hotel/state fees/taxes, as the
State of Mass. has started clamping down on B&B's, requiring them to charge
hotel tax, amoung other things.
|
4.108 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Fri Feb 19 1988 17:17 | 8 |
| RE: .36
Ain't it the truth! That's why a good budget will always include
funds for either a counselor or divorce lawyer. :-)
I think Hometime is a great show. At least they take only ONE
thing at a time and follow through until it is done. Some of the
more technical things may be left out, but most of their projects
are geared to the real DIY'er.
|
4.109 | | MYVAX::DIAMOND | Not one of the Beasty Boys | Fri Feb 19 1988 17:59 | 13 |
|
I watched one episode of Hometime and thought it sucked. They were
building a deck about 6' in the air. Some of the stuff they did
I wouldn't do. The dug the footings for the pillars less then 2
feet down. Also they didn't use any fiberglass tubes for the concrete.
They didn't explain well how they figured out where the pillars
went.
None of these shows are really for the DIY'er. But at least TOH
is entertaining.
Mike
|
4.110 | An aside... | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | Have Mac - will travel | Fri Feb 19 1988 18:13 | 22 |
| I caught the first of this series of TOH but none of the other
episodes. I thought I would digress (after all what are notes for?)
for a moment. The loud wallpaper reminded me of a true story.
We used to live in Newport RI and were looking for a house to buy.
We viewed one which was not selling. The market was slow (*high*
interest rates at the time) and the interior design was *all* (as
in every room) done in wallpaper in loud large plaids. Oh yeah,
the kitchen was done in large flowers. We made an offer hoping
the owners were desparate and would deal. Well, no deal occurred.
Several years later we were looking at a house for sale by owner
in Andover MA. It was decorated all in large plaids and the kitchen
was done in large flowers. During the conversation the owner
mentioned that they had lived in RI. I said "116 Taylor Rd,
Portsmouth". The guy's jaw hit the floor and he just looked at me.
It was hard explaining how I knew without being insulting and
getting too red in the face.
There is just NO accounting for taste
Stan
|
4.111 | ...and by your taste shall ye be known... | JOET::JOET | | Fri Feb 19 1988 18:33 | 6 |
| re: .43
Sorry, this one will have to go in a new topic called "Why do they
EVER keep doing that over and over again".
-joet
|
4.112 | Your missing the details for a reason | CIMNET::BOURDEAU | Rich Bourdeau | Fri Feb 19 1988 20:14 | 7 |
| The Hometime Series shown on PSB sometime misses details, because
they are just subsets of the complete show. For example, The Deck
Building show really runs 48 min, but PBS has only a 30 min slot
to air the show. Therefor, some parts are left out. You will notice
that at the end they mention that you can order the complete tape
for $9.95. I've also seen these tapes in a couple of wood working
catalogues.
|
4.113 | TOH kitchen cabinets | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Mon Feb 22 1988 10:52 | 15 |
| I went to the homeshow in Boston this weekend and discovered the makers of the
cabinets for TOH. WOW!!! These folks do real quality work. For example, if
one looks at the lids on their grain bins you can see that they first made one
big lid and cut it in thirds since the grain matches all the way across.
The worksmanship is magnificant and now it looks like any cabinets I look at
will always be second best. However, I'll never be able to buy those because
their price is UNBELIEVABLE. The display, which is probably around 1/2 of what
was in the TOH kitchen was 18K! I probably should have asked what the TOH
kitchen cost, but didn't.
The only way I can sum up those cabinets it to point out they ARE high quality
furniture and for that you have to pay $$$.
-mark
|
4.114 | Just an Optimist | CURLEY::OBRIEN | | Mon Feb 22 1988 11:13 | 10 |
|
In these times of masive construction when there is more work
than contractors could want or can handle, I think one of the
biggest bennies of having TOH do your renovations is that they
have to stick to a schedule. Therefore your house would be done
at least close to the projected completion date, or better yet
starting date. Contractors would show up when they say they will,
(A Miracle).
Just trying to look at the bright side.
|
4.115 | | FDCV14::DUNN | Karen Dunn 223-2651 | Mon Feb 22 1988 11:52 | 9 |
|
we have the hometime tape on re-siding a house. Only watched the
part up to wrapping the house up in the permeable material, but so far
we think it has been very throrough.
Ok, so they launched into an ad on a Chevy Pick up. It was really
pretty funny the way they did it.
Anyway, we found it worthwhile.
|
4.116 | What's that white bowl fill of water? | WFOVX3::KOEHLER | warm sunny South..next week! | Mon Feb 22 1988 13:57 | 8 |
| Being from the country, I can't figure why so many bathrooms
in the latest remodeling project. Can't they share?
Shoot, I have an unlimited number in my barn; when it's cold. you
can fit maybe 8 or 10 guys around the drain in the bay, and weather
permitting, behind the barn....there is 200 acres of trees.
Jim, who's neighbors have a three holer.
|
4.117 | Lawsuit??? | DELNI::HANDEL | | Mon Feb 22 1988 14:35 | 5 |
| I heard a rumor that the owners were
suing TOH for going so far over budget...
and had contacted other show houses and
all had been way over budget. Has anyone
else heard this?
|
4.118 | me too on this | MIZZEN::DEMERS | Do the workstation thing | Wed Feb 24 1988 17:26 | 9 |
| Ah, shoot, I saw a reference to TOH in a previous note and got my
two cents in. Oh, well.
Hey, TOH may make a good night time soap opera. How about Norm,
Bob and Richard Trethewey in a three stooges remake?
Chris (thinking of calling the GBH response line, it's getting
bad!!)
|
4.119 | now I know why people are so willing to donate! | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Feb 25 1988 11:11 | 0 |
4.120 | here they go again!!! | SEDJAR::BERUBE | Claude G. Berube | Thu Feb 25 1988 23:15 | 26 |
| Well I just watch the first installment of the next This Old
(EXPENSIVE) House.
Well another Yuppie type homeowner. He is a loan officer, she's a
managerial assistance to a landscape artist. (I doubt their
professions had anything to do with this, Whiplash of the Wetherbee
project perhaps ;^))
I did notice that Bob stressed the fact (twice) that the homeowner
must be capable of financing if need be in order to pay the bills and
provide sweat equity, and that TOH would try to help by acquiring
donated materials. (I wonder if the Wetherbee house project had
anything to do with this).
Norm show's up to take a look and suggest they take the next flight
out. Seem the house's foundation is slowly eroding, and they need to
raise the house and pour a new one. The first floor ceiling won't
handle the load of a second floor (made of 2x4's) and will need a
structural Eng. to spec the beams etc.
All in all I felt Bob and Norm felt the effect of bad preparation from
the Wetherbee project and seem to be really covering the bases (or is it
their a___).
Claude
|
4.121 | Weatherbee west? | AKOV68::CRAMER | | Fri Feb 26 1988 11:32 | 20 |
| re: .53
This was great. I saw Norm mention the next flight out, and
laughed alot. I didn't see the beginning of the show, did they
mention how long the owners have had the place, and/or, how much
they paid for it.
I loved the engineering. A two foot loose poured concrete
foundation ( concrete made with beach sand, therefore, crumbling
due to the salt content ) with a 2x4 studded knee wall supporting
the 2x8 floor joists. 2x4 ceiling joists AND rafters, and they
are going to put a second floor on this place. The roof has old
wood shingles covered with asphalt, no sheathing. I don't think
I'd want to be around when they jack that sucker up.
Then there was the scene at the architects where the owners
complain about losing living space to the new stairway. This
has the makings of another laugher!
Alan
|
4.122 | big bucks in Santa Barbara | MIZZEN::DEMERS | Do the workstation thing | Fri Feb 26 1988 11:52 | 11 |
| re .54
They paid $150,000 four years ago and the figure it would sell today
for a cool $250,000! Not bad for a bungalow on a postage stamp
lot.
Once again, the DIY aspect goes down the tubes in the first episode.
Raising the house? Rebuilding the joists? Forget Norm, if I were
the homeowner, I'd get the first plane out!
Chris
|
4.123 | My house would have been a better choice | PYRITE::BURKHART | | Fri Feb 26 1988 12:30 | 19 |
| It's funny to think that out of the 100 or so replies to their
ads and promotions they got, this was the best they could come up
with. I mean, they can't be that stupid (or can they)? They must
of screened out houses with major problems and people that had no
money. Why don't they come to my house? I could use a new
master bedroom suite in my attic. And my house is only 3 years old
has 2x6 floor joists and 2x8 roof rafters. In addition I just got
a $25k home equity loan and I know all about sweat equity.
My wife's boss was renavating the old Train station in Framingham
and contacted TOH people to see if they were interested in doing
a shoot. He didn't even need their money just a little advise on
resturation and thought it would be nice to have his place on TV.
They told him they had all their projects lined up for a year in
advance.
...Dave
|
4.124 | CA sweat equity <> MA sweat equity | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Did you see that?! | Fri Feb 26 1988 12:41 | 22 |
|
I noticed the repeated reference to financing and especially sweat
equity too. Also at the start, Bob says "Well, since I can't talk
you out of moving...." Sounds like a new approach is definitely
being taken!
When the show started, I thought they were going to renovate the
large stone church Bob and the Monk were standing in front of.
After the last project, why not?
As for the homeowners, I found it quite amusing that at the start
the husband said they fully understood the meaning of home equity
since they've got the house into shape since moving in. Then they
walk through the house with Bob asking about the tiling, "did you
do this?" Nope, here when we bought the house. Nice floors, did
you refinish them? Nope, we hired it out. Nice backyard
landscaping... Nope.... Nice deck, YA we did it!! I guess the
definition of sweat equity is building a deck.
This is going to be a good one...
Phil
|
4.125 | One nevers knows | SEDJAR::BERUBE | Claude G. Berube | Fri Feb 26 1988 16:33 | 11 |
| re. -1 Maybe the home owner was basing the sweat equity on what he saw
the Wetherbee Home owner did during the show? :^) nah they can't be
that stupid can they?
I wonder if last night show was taped prior to the showing of last week
wrapup show and wether or not the California couple has been watching
the past season to see what they are in for. If not, boy are they
stupid!!!!
Claude
|
4.126 | reality? | MIZZEN::DEMERS | Do the workstation thing | Fri Feb 26 1988 16:43 | 11 |
| re: .56
Remember, this is not reality, but Bob's fantasy.
re: .57
This couple bought a bulgalow for $150k that has no foundation to
speak of, a roof that has no underlayment and an illegal and unsafe
attic room. Like you said, "...they can't be that stupid, can they"?
/C
|
4.127 | | HPSMEG::LUKOWSKI | I lost my A$$ in the '87 CRASH! | Fri Feb 26 1988 17:03 | 10 |
| Weak foundation?!? Didn't you see Norm stick his finger into
it? Bob did keep pressing the homeowners about money and they implied
that they could get their hands on $100K (that's what the house
appreciated and he is a loan officer). I think that this project
really translates to another happy marriage down the tubes. But
we'll still have fun with it. :^)
-Jim
|
4.128 | There are different kind of sweat. | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | Have Mac - will travel | Fri Feb 26 1988 17:14 | 7 |
| I think this homeowner has the same definition of sweat equity that
I do. I really SWEAT when I have to write out a check >$1000. (Less
than that I just sweat a little :-) Actually, it is this sort of
sweating that makes me do some of the strenuous sweating that I
have done.
Stan
|
4.129 | CAlifornia = Lighter Roof Loads | SALEM::PAGLIARULO | | Fri Feb 26 1988 21:00 | 7 |
| re .59
Is the attic room in violation of anything? Remember California
foofs don't have to support snow loads. Of course then again shingles
do get heavy.
George
|
4.130 | | JOET::JOET | | Mon Feb 29 1988 12:03 | 10 |
| re: .57
> When the show started, I thought they were going to renovate the large
> stone church Bob and the Monk were standing in front of. After the last
> project, why not?
When they started at the monastery, my wife and I looked at each other
and simultaneously said, "Condos?!"
-joet
|
4.131 | Ain't nuttin wrong wit dem too-by-furs | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Did you see that?! | Mon Feb 29 1988 21:33 | 13 |
|
Everybody knocked the 2x4 construction of the attic area and roof
rafters! Then Bob *AND NORM* proceed to walk up on that roof to
examine it!! All I can say is, if that roof can support Bob and
the Master, it can't be that weak structurally! ;-)
They just don't make 2x4's like they used to...
Phil
P.S.
Did anybody happen to notice who answered the door to that 2.5 million
dollar shack?
|
4.132 | | USADEC::KWILSON | | Mon Feb 29 1988 22:13 | 16 |
| re .64 You mean Ms. pink_perino_travertine_granite_individually
cut_imported from_Arizona_Persia_Tile City? Before she
became the assistant to the assistant, wasn't she something
of the month? I'm really glad we got to see that house
since it showed me what's missing from my 1300 sq/ft
bedroom...a sculpture nook! Perhaps with some donated
materials, a home equity loan, a structural engineer,
an architect and, of course, lots of SWEAT EQUITY, maybe
I can finally have my very own sculpture nook! And...
we'll paint it red with a garbage bag and line the shelves
with really garish wallpaper and then I'll need a fine art
consultant and a decorator...oh never mind, I'd have to
have Vila around my house for a few months. Now I think
I know why the Weatherbee_yuppies weren't around for the
last few shows...
|
4.133 | Nuke the "beemers" DIE YUPPIE SCUM!! | SALEM::AMARTIN | nemoW SDEEN sraM | Tue Mar 01 1988 05:32 | 6 |
| Nuke the Weatherbee house and that pinko YUPPIE joint that we saw
the other night!! :-)
(unless I buy it!)
Now what was KO's home #?
@L
|
4.134 | I can't even believe it! | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | Have Mac - will travel | Tue Mar 01 1988 16:20 | 21 |
| Well, I caught most of the show under discussion this weekend.
Boy, are these owners dumb. If I had a nice cottage that had a
decaying foundation and 2x4s for the ceiling and rafters, I'd either
1) live in it as a nice cottage
2) sell it to another yuppie sucker and buy one the same size that
was structurally sound and renovate it.
and
3) not let Bob and Norm within a 1000 miles of it. Certainly
not on the roof!
Bob and Norm are going save one wall of this house by the time they
are done. The rest is going to be a new colonial. I can just see
it! Did you notice they had to go all the way to CA to find these
suckers. The locals must know these bozos and the TOH circus.
I will bet that they bring in a crane to move the avocado "where
else can you pick your lunch" tree when they have rip out the old
foundation and it is in the way. This is going to be a classic!
Stan
|
4.135 | TOH 3 times a week thanks to cable | PYRITE::BURKHART | | Tue Mar 01 1988 16:39 | 11 |
| I saw an promo for next weeks mini marathon this old house
on Ch 11 N.H. The marathon show will be doing a complete basement
playroom/family room. But in the promo Bob was standing in the
back yard of the CA cottage. The view I got was all new windows
in the house, a short deck comming off the back at the 2nd floor
level with big sliders into the new room. Didn't Norm in passing
mention something about not liking the windows?
...Dave
|
4.136 | Control yourself Bob | ARCHER::FOX | | Tue Mar 01 1988 18:51 | 7 |
| re .68
Do you when they plan to broadcast that basement series? Something
like that may actually be *useful*. Of course, based on past
episodes, they're probably planning to put in a built in pool
or something down there...
John
|
4.137 | SUNDAY? | PYRITE::BURKHART | | Tue Mar 01 1988 19:02 | 10 |
| This Sunday (3/6/88) or next Sunday (3/13/88) starting at 9:00AM
Channel 11 N.H. public Television. Thats Ch 33 on my cable system.
I belive they said it was going to be a 5 parter 2 & 1/2 hours.
They said they were going to be doing suspended ceilings and real
DIYer stuff.
Sorry not exact on the date, normally I just set the VCR.
...Dave
|
4.138 | | VINO::LUKOWSKI | | Tue Mar 01 1988 19:55 | 9 |
| For their marathon, they have to put on something useful...this
is where they break in every 10-15 minutes asking for donations.
Can you imagine the lack of donations if they broadcast that latest
TOH project? :^) However, I'm sure you will still see the devastated
homeowner that's gone wayyyyyy over budget. Anyone remember the
last marathon?
-Jim
|
4.16 | TOH SPECIAL: 3/12/88 | FHQ::HICKOX | Stow Vice | Fri Mar 04 1988 12:06 | 7 |
|
"This Old House" will be broadcasting a 3-hour special on
Saturday, March 12, 1988 (time unknown) on WGBH, Channel 2-Boston.
It will be 3 hours of how to refinish a basement.
|
4.139 | Even in the Wall St. Journal! | SMURF::HODGES | | Fri Mar 04 1988 12:12 | 8 |
|
You will all be amused to note that this project has even attracted the
attention of the Wall Street Journal. In today's edition they give a
description of the costs, and the trials and tribulations of this house
renovation project - right on page 1! It makes good reading - but it's
kind of long to type in. Maybe if I get a few hours free later today...
- rick
|
4.140 | Design Is Nice but How about Construction | PYRITE::BURKHART | | Fri Mar 04 1988 12:28 | 35 |
|
I can't believe how how little of the construction phase they
showed. For that matter how little of the demolition. I wanted to see
how the were going to cut the new floor joists in but by day 4 they
were all done. Also how did they support the old section of roof when
the removed the back half. I don't care about a scale model. Tell me
how many of you have had architects do plans for your addition? Now
of those people how many have had scaled models made?
The home owners have a 50k loan. I think they'll be very lucky
to come in at 49.9k. Lets see, so far in addition to their new bedroom
they are getting; new foundation, new plumbing, new heating, and
probably air conditioning, new roof, new landscaping, (needed do to
demolition), new back side of house.
One thing I did like about using the architect, and Norm mentioned
it too, Was the detailed drawings of the framing. My father is
currently building some house on land in CT and the plans he bought are
very undetailed and the carpenters are having a hell of a time doing
the framing.
Oh, one more thing. How do you think Bob got his truck to
California? I can't believe he drove it, maybe rail or air.
...Dave
PS. TOH marathon: Saturday, March 12, 9AM, Channel 2, WGBH.
also on Sunday, March 6, 9AM, Channel 11, New Hampshire public TV
Show runs 3 hours
|
4.141 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Mar 04 1988 12:37 | 11 |
| Yes, I was rather disappointed by the lack of detail about
construction. The new ceiling joists appeared, as if by magic;
the house got supported on jacks, with no information about
the planning or load calculations that went into the job.
I assume the truck is a different one, courtesy of a local California
Ford dealer; anybody notice if it has a California licence plate?
The Gambel house sure was something though, wasn't it? Teak and
mahogany paneling, stained glass doors, ....
|
4.142 | TOH - One Big Commercial | USWAV3::FAGERBERG | | Fri Mar 04 1988 12:49 | 0 |
4.143 | Mass plate has 6 chars, Calif has 7 | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Fri Mar 04 1988 13:40 | 0 |
4.144 | | PNEUMA::WAGONER | | Fri Mar 04 1988 15:15 | 5 |
| re .74 the Gambel house
Nice place. Notice the two single beds in the Master Suite?
The rich ARE different...
|
4.145 | what happens when I pull this | ATEAM::COVIELLO | | Fri Mar 04 1988 15:43 | 10 |
| It was definitly his truck from mass. as soon as he drove up I started
watching for the plates sure enough they were mass. Trying to save
money so decided to drive ( or was it not saving money) oh well
next maybe he'll try driving to south america (europe after that
maybe ?)
I couldn't believe he pulled the pegs out of the Gambel house.
neat
|
4.146 | The Same Plate | PYRITE::BURKHART | | Fri Mar 04 1988 15:46 | 6 |
| It was eather his truck from Mass or else a look-a-like with
his own Mass plate. I specificly checked the plate and compaired
it to the plate on his truck in one of the old shows. The same.
...Dave
|
4.147 | This was an excellent note! | SMURF::YELGIN | | Fri Mar 04 1988 16:02 | 18 |
| I have thoroughly enjoyed all 77 replies to the original 1974 note.
My cube neighbors must have thought that I was losing it because
I was laughing so much. We've got a lot of comedians out there.
TOH has sure changed as .75 mentioned. I just don't relate to the
projects anymore. Whatever happened to adding a garage or building
a shed?
My wife and I watch the show because it's better than the soaps for
sheer mindless entertainment. Bob Vila's grabbing, touching and
pulling on everything still bugs me, but I try to enjoy the show
anyway. I'm waiting for the day when Bob will have bugged the Master
(Norm) so much that he'll pick up his power pneumatic nailer and chase Bob
around the building site shooting at him.
It's only a dream! The editors would surely cut it out.
|
4.148 | | HPSMEG::LUKOWSKI | I lost my A$$ in the '87 CRASH! | Fri Mar 04 1988 16:44 | 7 |
| Didn't anybody catch the rude remark that the guy installing the
foundation made? Bob said something to the effect that 'wouldn't
it be nice to have a sky hook to lift this place up'. The guy's
response was that he would rather have a stinger missile blow it
up. The amazing thing is that this wasn't edited out.
-Jim
|
4.149 | what kind of truck next year? | MPGS::BARWISE | | Fri Mar 04 1988 18:06 | 8 |
|
more about the truck...it sure comes in handy having an F350 extended
cab 4WD to carry around two little metal boxes in Santa Barbara. I
wonder if the home owners are going to have to pay the gas bill...
|
4.150 | ...and the final bill is... | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | Have Mac - will travel | Fri Mar 04 1988 18:13 | 3 |
| I can't believe how much money these people are spending to take
a sow's ear and make a silk sow's ear out of it! Each to their
own.
|
4.151 | Insensitivity and ridicule | USWAV3::FAGERBERG | | Fri Mar 04 1988 18:33 | 10 |
|
I am amazed at the insensitivity of the producers of TOH to allow
what to me is ridiculing the owners of this house. Aside from the
obvious structural defects this house has, I also find it hard to
believe how inspectors that are paid by the buyer to inspect houses
prior to morgage approvals put their blessings on a house like this.
Is everyone, with the exception of Nixon, a crook??? Granted this
may be all they could afford when they bought the house, but it
only proves one thing, YOU better know what you're doing when a
house costs those kinda bucks!!!!!
|
4.152 | A soon as the big quake hits, will it matter?? | MAGIC::COTE | | Fri Mar 04 1988 18:46 | 20 |
| Is the marathon show a rerun of 5 episodes that were done a couple
of years ago? I seem to remember B & N doing over some guys basement
and making these fake windows in front of the usual cellar windows
we know so well. The idea was that the light from the real cellar
windows was brought in through frosted casement windows with regular
curtains decorating them. Weird.
Does anybody remember the first TOH? I still think it and the Bigelow
job in Newton were the best.
BTW, I think someone should write TOH and tell them about the project
mentioned a while ago: Putting a roof over the leech field to prevent
rain water from causing problems.
Oh, I almost forgot who showed up last night, Rich the plumbers
nightmare. What kind of exotic copper masterpiece will he create
this time??????? Solar???? Nuke????? Geo-thermal??????
BC
|
4.153 | | ULTRA::PRIBORSKY | That's the stuff dreams are made of. | Mon Mar 07 1988 12:12 | 21 |
| I can see it now. Bob Vila will soon be writing articles which
will appear in various construction and architectural trade magazines
about:
The relative merits of skyhooks and stinger missles and how
it relates to home renovation.
Now, I wonder why they bring what's-his-name-the-heating-and-plumbing-
contractor all the way out there to recommend a "plumber who is
a legend in his own time"? Looks like Bob and crew are tired of
the New England winter and are using our PBS-donated money for a
boondoggle. I, for one, will be writing to WGBH.
I have a suggestion: If they want sweat equity, and some marvelous
old homes to remodel, why don't they look in the midwest? The 1890
house that my father and I remodeled was a marvel of construction.
Real oak 2x4's (when a 2x4 was really 2-inches by 4-inches.) The
opportunities for real DIYers in the farm belt are boundless, and
these people have no choice but to contribute sweat equity. But,
they'd probably end up in Chicago and remodel some business magnate's
mansion. Oh well...
|
4.154 | | TOPDOC::PHILBROOK | Chico's Daddy | Mon Mar 07 1988 15:26 | 12 |
| Did anyone catch the marathon yesterday- Deb and Ben Benedetti?
(That's a mouthful!) I thought it was a lot of fun watching 5
consecutive shows to see the project from start to finish.
The only thing that disappointed me was that they didn't show how
they installed the wainscotting (or did they?)
The real laugh came when Ben explained how he broke water pipe and
smashed the toilet! I guess every first-time DIY'er has an experience
like that.
Mike
|
4.155 | How about a stinger for B & N's truck? | CYGNUS::VHAMBURGER | Vic Hamburger IND-2/B4 262-8261 | Mon Mar 07 1988 17:10 | 35 |
|
I have been laughing my way thru this note for weeks now, and keep
missing the show itself. Finally caught it Saterday at suppertime.
Didn't someone a ways back say that severa<l contractors already made
remarks about demolition as opposed to renovation? I thought the Stinger
missle remark was great, that whole sub-structure looked built about as
well as a lean to at Boy Scout camp, except I figured the Boy Scouts would
have done a better job. I wonder how many neighbors ofthese folks are busy
watching this series on their local channel, only to hear/see comments like
that and have run out to check THEIR foundations. I know I would have!
Nice pitch for the USC Greene & Greene Gamble estate. Send you
donations in now folks, before this too is a remodel for Bob and Norm for
3-4 Million instead of just $1 Million. I can just imagine what they would
do to it.....
While we are all laughing about this silly show, and I think that is
what it has come down to, when is PBS going to give this a facelift and do
an in-depth series on stuff you and I are really interested in, such as a
1/2 hour of serious deck building, or how to flash a house according ot an
expert, or some other useful topics. I can think of dozens of jobs we all
do that we could do a bit better with a few tricks from the Pros. (I know,
this idea would then put Bob/Norm out of work). An in depth look at
something instead of this "Hi, its Monday and the demolition is starting,
and now its Thursday and the dumpster is gone, the house has been proped up
and the new foundation is curing". "Don't try this by yourself, use a
trained professional" No kidding, if I saw how they did it, maybe I might
be more inclined to call a professional to do some of this! The quick gloss
over of every part of the job is useless except to give me an outline of how
the approach a job like this one. EG. take off the old roof before putting
on a new one....No much use at all except for laughs.
Vic
|
4.156 | Typical cottage construction. | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | Have Mac - will travel | Mon Mar 07 1988 17:49 | 19 |
| This house they have been putting a new foundation under was (I
was going to say "summer" but it is not in MA) a *vacation* cottage.
You probably see this kind of construction on many summer cottages
down on the cape. A flat rock with a couple of blocks of wood on
it for a support.
Talking about foundations, the hottest thing in the Catskills of
NY (old stomping grounds) is summer cottage condos. These things
are typically "quickly and shoddily" built. The foundations are
sometimes PT 4x4s in cement sunk below the frostline. The floor
is about 4' off the ground (stilts) and they are built two or four
units under one roof. They cost 28-35K so you can imagine the
quality.
In 20 or 30 years B & N can do a show on how to fix one of these
things up for year round living. "We will just slip a basement
under here and then..."
Stan
|
4.157 | More ideas for the California house | MAGIC::COTE | | Mon Mar 07 1988 18:02 | 24 |
| It occurred to me that they could have done something really different
with the California house. In stead of ripping off the roof and
replacing the foundation, they could have really jacked the house
up, say 10 to 12 feet, put in a new foundation, and then built a
new first floor. Then once the new first floor was complete then
they could have lowered the old first floor back down on top of
the new first floor. The result would be a 3 story house, with
a structurally sound first floor and a new foundation.
Perhaps they're going to do this on their next project, but it seems
to me it would have made this whole job easier without the mess
of demolishing the house to begin with.
Another thought would have been to call in some guys who move houses,
and just put the house on wheels and drive it around for a week
while the new foundation was poured and a new first floor was built.
This would remove the danger of working under a jacked up house
and the original house could be driven to interesting places where
Bob and Norm would perform the usual show and tell and touch and
poke and ask stupid questions routine. Bob could use his truck
to tow the house too.
BC
|
4.158 | | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Mon Mar 07 1988 18:12 | 7 |
|
My neighbor and I got quite a laugh out of the scale model produced by
the architectural firm. Anyone care to guess how much they would
charge a "walk-in" type customer for that model? I'll bet it would
soak up a good percentage of the $50K budget...
JP
|
4.159 | | KLAATU::BERUBE | Claude G. Berube | Mon Mar 07 1988 18:13 | 20 |
| reply to < Note 1974.72 by SMURF::HODGES >
> -< Even in the Wall St. Journal! >-
I read the article over the weekend, seems that since TOH left the
Wheterbee house, the had occurances of the roof leaking, paint peeling,
pilot light going out on that nice well built/sturdy stove, that nice
furnace job is still not complete (missing humidifier, air cleaner).
Gee I wonder if the California couple read the article?
As for details on cost according to WSJ, they originally paid 250K for
the property, over 250K in donations, and the homeowners have paid 194K
so far and still owe around 30K (seems they will have to sell a house
in Maine to paydown the mortgage on the place).
I think 60 minutes or some other show difinetly should showcase the
place in 6 months and detail everything that had gone wrong, what the
homeowners changed since TOH left etc.
Claude
|
4.160 | Wanna tell WGBH ?? | AKOV88::CRAMER | | Mon Mar 07 1988 18:18 | 8 |
| Here's an idea for all concerned.
Instead of sitting out here making (admittedly hilarious) jokes
about TOH, what say someone extracts this, and all the other TOH
notes, edits out any incriminating bits (like names) and sends the
result to WGBH as an example of audience response?
Alan
|
4.161 | Don't you dare! | MAGIC::COTE | | Mon Mar 07 1988 18:31 | 11 |
| re: .93
DON'T YOU DARE!!!!!!!! Notes are for internal use and laughs only.
Besides, what else would we be able to poke fun at, Masterpiece
Theater????? Taking out Alister Cook with a stinger missle doesn't
seem like a lot of fun to watch. And he probably doesn't have a
pick-up truck or a side kick named Norm.
BC
|
4.162 | Wanna do some letter writing? | PSTJTT::TABER | Eunuchs are a trademark of AT&T | Mon Mar 07 1988 18:31 | 22 |
| > -< Wanna tell WGBH ?? >-
There's a better way. WGBH and all the other Public Television stations
will be having their fund-raisers soon. (it doesn't matter that I don't
know the date, since the above sentence is correct no matter when you
say it.) That's the time to tell them that This Old House is no longer
your kind of show.
I'm not advocating that you stiff them, although you can. (Send the
begging letter back with a note saying "if you have money to send Bob
and Norm around to pester the nation, then you have all the money you
need.") But just enclose a note with your dontation saying that you
think TOH has gotten off the track and they no longer meet your needs.
Mail that comes in with contributions (or instead of contributions) gets
a lot of notice, and it gets it from the right people: the people who
can tell Bob and Norm to get back in touch with their roots before the
programming department finds a new comedy team. You can say what you
want about them being owned by the oil companies, but public TV still is
more responsive to their audience than any network or cable company.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
4.163 | call now! | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Mon Mar 07 1988 19:39 | 18 |
| I got so inspired I just called them!!!
The number is 617-492-2777
I'm not really sure who I talked to but when I told the person who answered the
phone that I'd like to supply some comments on TOH, I got handed off to someone.
I tild him that a bunch of us at work (notice I didn't say DEC) agreed that the
show has been going down the tubes and that the main reason we now watch it is
to laugh at it. I pointed out the absurdity of Bob Villa's truck and the
plumbing contractor flying out from back east. I got the feeling that this
wasn't the first time he'd heard it.
Anyhow, he said he'd pass the info on to the producer...
Maybe if enough of us call, it'll help drive the point home.
-mark
|
4.164 | Spread the laughs ;^) | AKOV88::CRAMER | | Mon Mar 07 1988 20:04 | 12 |
| re: .94
I would'nt presume to extract and spread these notes. However, being
a lousy (and lazy) typist, I thought that it would be a quick way
of getting a letter to stuff in with my (or your) contribution
ala .95.
I think that the breadth and depth of the complaints would hit home
a lot harder in such a letter. (Besides the folks at GBH could use
the laughs)
Alan
|
4.165 | but wait | MILRAT::HAMER | Ah, what fresh Hell is this? | Mon Mar 07 1988 20:16 | 35 |
| A word or two in defense of TOH? All of the nuts and bolts projects
that people in here suggest they do have been done. I'll bet there
would be a flurry of criticism if TOH turned into "Deck of the Week,"
or "One Switch to Wire." Part of what we are seeing PBS do is probably
in response to the millions of people who live in other parts of the
country than WGBH country who bitch about a seemingly endless stream
of grotty little capes with chopped up rooms and fieldstone basements.
I think the project in California is an effort to appeal to a wider
geographic audience. I think the mondo-projects are a recognition that
PBS is in the entertainment business. Carpentry seminar 101 would
garner zero contributions.
Granted that you or I might contact Ollie North for an extra stinger
missile to use rather than jack up our houses to repair the
foundation, but when middle class housing is on the way to becoming an
oxymoron I don't think the project is quite as outlandish as some have
indicated.
What do you want them to do? Say "you guys are building a second floor
under a rotten roof and trying to support it with 2x4s and a
foundation the primary component of which is beach sand" and we'll be
happy to help you do it to keep the cost down?" If Norm and Bob and
Russ get sued for misrepresentation or cost overruns, the damages
wouldn't compare to what they'd get socked for if the homeowner's
son Sam was crushed to death when mommy and a full bathtub crashed
through the inadequately supported new upstairs bathroom floor and
landed in his crib, or if the house tipped off its foundation into the
street in the path of an oncoming schoolbus.
Maybe it is just a case of an idea whose time is past.
Anyway, I'd be happy for a week or so of Norm's time and tools to help
with my projects.
John H.
|
4.166 | Anothe story about toeh... | SALEM::AMARTIN | nemoW SDEEN sraM | Tue Mar 08 1988 03:24 | 6 |
| I remember seeing a story about a penthouse that toh did and something
about bobs bobo. The booboo was building it on a building that
was not ok'd by some bigwig or sumtin... I dono, anyone shed any
light? I know it is (apparently) real because I read it a while ago
but cannot for the life of me remember the whole story. HELP!
@L
|
4.167 | Empty red boxes in a pickup? | CREDIT::LAVASH | Same as it ever was... | Tue Mar 08 1988 12:26 | 5 |
| I'm surprised no one else has already mentioned this, did you see
when Bob took his 2 shiny tool boxes out of the truck last week?
They looked like they were empty or mostly empty to me.
George
|
4.168 | | CHAS::JACKSON | who you jivin' with that cosmic debris? | Tue Mar 08 1988 13:16 | 17 |
| RE: .99
It wasn't TOH, it was just Bob. He built a penthouse condo on top
of a building that he owned in the Back Bay (I think) without
consulting the building inspector, and the preservation society
(that bunch of fuddy-duddies that won't allow you to change anything
in the Back Bay) Anyway, he built the place and then sold it.
The new owner is now in deep shit from the City cause he doesn't
have any permits for the place he's living in. He's sueing Vila
for some ungodly amount of money.
Haven't heard much about this one for a while. Last I heard was
when the suit was filed about a year ago.
-bill
|
4.169 | Norm's toys on the way | SEESAW::PILANT | L. Mark Pilant | Tue Mar 08 1988 13:58 | 7 |
| RE: .100
And I liked Norm's comment about having to wait for his tools
to be shipped out from back east. Wonder what he'll have shipped
out?
- Mark
|
4.170 | :-) :-) :-) | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | Have Mac - will travel | Tue Mar 08 1988 14:19 | 2 |
| Looks like Norm's main tools are his lunch pail and beer cooler.
:-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)
|
4.171 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | the Gort | Tue Mar 08 1988 23:05 | 12 |
| re.102
Bobs inventory list:
Beer
Cooler(optional unless insulated tool box full)
Donation reciept book
pencil(not rated for pen use yet)
Instant foundation rot formula
Bottle of water for above
Measuring tape(in blister package)
Unused hammer
Extra belt size 50
|
4.172 | how much moooolaahhh?? | SALEM::AMARTIN | nemoW SDEEN sraM | Fri Mar 11 1988 04:04 | 3 |
| Thanks 101. Did they ever win/loose? How much did bobbybabe loose?
I knew I was right. I remember seeing the story but couldnt remember
the whole thing. thanks again. @L
|
4.173 | Bring on the Missiles | KLAATU::BERUBE | Claude G. Berube | Fri Mar 11 1988 11:17 | 31 |
| Looks like the folk's in California are due for a good cry. If I were
them I would bomb the place and start over. Seems that since last week
show the following has happened
- they had a major storm and have severe water damage to the back 2
rooms (nice to know the contractor did a good job on cover the
house)
- When they lowered the house onto the new foundation, the heard
cracks everywhere, and especially in the Homeowner dear kitchen
which they weren't going to touch. (I noticed a Bump in the
Living room wall that didn't seem to be there in last week show)
- Electrical contractor suggest rewiring the whole house from a 2
wire 30-amp feed to a 3 wire 100amp feed. (should cost from 2-3K
depending on what he finds)
- Homeowner made a statement to the effect all these things add up
and the budget is getting tight (seems he hasn't been watching
TOH lately to know that when Bob and Norm are involved you'd
better have unlimited funds), and didn't he state he was appoved
for a max of 50K or something like that, this should be fun when
they total the bill, or will this be missing from this series as
well.
Oh well I did like the PLUMBER's truck though (Want to bet that Bob and
Norm do something similar for next season in order to carry thier new
toys around ;^))
Claude
|
4.174 | forgot to mention | KLAATU::BERUBE | Claude G. Berube | Fri Mar 11 1988 11:26 | 4 |
| I forgot to add that the siding was nailed directly to the 2 by 4's,
seemed they didn't believe in sheating in those day's.
Claude
|
4.175 | The new 3 stooges | TUNER::BEAUDET | | Fri Mar 11 1988 17:40 | 15 |
| My daughter and I have been watching this segment with as much interest
as she usually shows in soaps (A lot!)
When the last show started and Bob mention a "disaster inside" I
called her to watch. As they started to show the damage she was
in complete histerics! The expressions on the couples face as they
showed Bob the damage was priceless.
What a laugher..can't wait for the next one.
WGBH should keep it the way it is and run it along with the Three
Stooges films. Maybe there's even a new carrer in it for Bob and
Norm. Bob, Norm, and Yuppie.
/tb/
|
4.176 | Bob better whatch out! | USRCV1::RECUPAROR | | Wed Mar 16 1988 14:44 | 6 |
| After the owners take Bob through the house and show him the damage
to the plaster, the cracks in the walls, the damage to the kitchen
they just remodeled what does good old Bob say,"Well lets go look
at the plumbers niffty truck!". Does he have a heart (if he does
this owner may want it).
|
4.177 | Words of Wisdom | MEMORY::FARRELL | Joe Farrell, ESD Methods, SHR01-3/020 | Thu Mar 17 1988 15:35 | 13 |
| Bob also had another classic comment, when the owners are showing him
the ruined floors and ceilings, he says "Well, your new windows are in!"
and gets more evil looks from the homeowners. This project is budgeted
for $50k, I'd guess the final cost at $75k, when they are done. I'm
also surprised that the owners didn't get flak when they bought the house,
from the house-inspector, from things like the 30a service and the rube-
goldberg foundation system.
But then again, they probably didn't have the house
inspected...
:)
|
4.178 | | SALEM::PAGLIARULO | | Thu Mar 17 1988 15:49 | 4 |
| I especially liked the part where Bob is reviewing the storm damage,
see's the big hole in the wall at the waste pipe and says something
to the effect of "Oh, look did the storm do this too!?" The owner's
looked at him and said "No.....the plumbers were here."
|
4.179 | Show needs a new title | SEDJAR::BERUBE | Claude G. Berube | Thu Mar 17 1988 18:38 | 4 |
| Maybe it's time for WGBH to reconsider the name of the show and change
it to Bob and Norm's Money Pit.
Claude
|
4.180 | money pit.. | FDCV14::DUNN | Karen Dunn 223-2651 | Thu Mar 17 1988 19:12 | 13 |
| To digress (in this notes file ??)...
the Money Pit is one of the best side-splitters I've ever seen in my
opinion.
The first time we saw it was shortly after we moved into new condos
which were very over-schedule. We rented it again after we bought our
first house and were in the middle of many projects. I just saw it
again on cable at my parents last weekend, the four of us were
hysterical.
My favorite part is definitely the kitchen burning scene ending with
the turkey flying into the bathroom and the popper popping.
|
4.181 | ABS vs PVC | HARPO::B_HENRY | Bill Henry | Fri Mar 18 1988 12:05 | 9 |
| Channel 2 had two episodes of TOH on last night, the first being the one
where Norm said after viewing the storm damage, well at least the windows
came in. I was impressed with the plumbers truck. I have never, and most
likely never will see anything that organized. Plumbers dressed in white!
What gets me is the home owners almost seemed to be reading a script.
And the lady was carrying a baby, that never moved. He made a point that
drain pipes were made of ABS rather than PVC, any idea why?
|
4.182 | Deja Vu | ARCHER::FOX | | Fri Mar 18 1988 12:37 | 6 |
| regarding the episode last night:
Was'nt that last weeks? I didn't all of last weeks, but I remember
the skit with the plumbers' truck. Lo and behold, I see it again
last night. What's up?
John
|
4.183 | channel 11's show last night. | MAGIC::COTE | | Fri Mar 18 1988 13:04 | 21 |
| The PBS station in NH seemed to be one week ahead of the show on
channel 2 @ 8:00 last night. TOH is on at 7:30 on channel 11, so
if something really interesting, strange, or funny happens on the
early show, I can see it again on channel 2 the same night.
The 7:30 show had a tour of the Hurst castle. Bob really got excited
about the beer tap in the kitchen of the castle.
The landscape architect was also on the show. The lot is so small,
why did the even bother. He (the architect) did say something about
getting rid of the deck the owner built and was moved on the first
show.
The owner did do some crack covering with some pretty fancy stuff,
and the roofer talked about the type of random roof they're putting
on. He had some neat tools as well.
Norm kept on fooling around with a trellis and putting pegs in beams.
BC
|
4.184 | House cracked,gee that's too bad ... | TOOK::ARN | | Fri Mar 18 1988 13:43 | 6 |
| With regards to the fiberglass wallpaper they put up, did they say
whether or not that would make a suitable surface for painting
afterwards? Or, was it just a prep for wallpaper.
Tim_with_cracked_walls
|
4.185 | | CENSRD::SCANLAND | Insurance-Write your Legislator! | Fri Mar 18 1988 14:38 | 15 |
| WGBH (PBS ch. 2) is doing their quasi-semi-annual pledge drive. The
reason they were a week behind and caught up by showing two last night
is that (so help me) a Lawrence Welk Special was on in ToH's palce last
week.
Re: Norm and the redwood beams: I was impressed. Wonder how much a 20'
long 4"X6" beam costs. I wouldn't mind seeing Norm do a half hour or an
hour on the use of power tools (routers, band saws, zillion-in-one
machines etc...
How 'bout the Hearst Castle. Poured concrete roof trusses! The wife
said upon viewing the dining room: "This is what moves people to
communism."
Chuck
|
4.186 | Will the Hearst castle be next? | MAGIC::COTE | | Fri Mar 18 1988 15:05 | 11 |
| I wonder if Bob was scouting their next rehab job when he was touring
the Hearst castle (sorry for the misspelling earlier). Just think
of the neat things the Bob, Norm, and Rich the plumber could do
with that place. The owner's (State of Calif) should be able to
raise a couple of million to do the job and the guys could go over
budget by a couple of million per cent.
Hell, slap some sheet rock over those old ceilings.....
BC
|
4.187 | | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Did you see that?! | Fri Mar 18 1988 15:11 | 16 |
| RE: .117
The fiberglass reinforcement looked like a 3 foot wide roll of
fiberglass joint tape. Can't image how you'd paint over it and
have it look anywhere near presentable. They said it cost $.28/sf
RE: .118
I agree, the "pergola" is the most interesting part of last nights
show. Finally, something TOH is constructing instead of destroying!
As for the Hearst castle (which they referred to several times as
the "ranch), truly unbelievable! Someday I hope to live in a house
as big as some of those rooms!!
Phil
|
4.188 | Home Sweet Castle or is it Castle Sweet Home? | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | House < $200k = Mass. Miracle | Fri Mar 18 1988 16:07 | 7 |
| re: .18
I found myself much more moved toward capitalism. It should be
a while before I "move up" to a place like the Hearst Castle.
(better pick up my MEGABUCKS ticket on the way home. Sigh.)
Stan
|
4.189 | | CHARON::DCOX | Try? Try not! Do, or do not. | Fri Mar 18 1988 16:12 | 5 |
| The Hearst Castle IS the height of capitalism. They charge a small fortune for
the tours. That's - tourS. They manage to break it up into four expensive
segments. Gad, what a ripoff. From the size of the crowds on off days, I
would guess that they are a major contributor to California Tax Relief.
|
4.190 | About that deck... | EVER11::LOWELL | | Fri Mar 18 1988 16:22 | 20 |
| I thought that one of the reasons for not expanding off of the back
of the house was because the owners wanted to keep the deck they
had built. (From the first show)
Then, the deck is carefully "rolled" away from the house. So I
assumed that they were going to keep it. This surprised me because
it isn't like Bob and Norm to allow the owners to keep anything
DIY.
Now Bob says they are going to cart it away.
I know I have a mind like a sieve so please correct me if this is
wrong.
By the way, I did notice the look and grunt that Bob gave the owners
when they said they had done the kitchen themselves and didn't plan
on doing anything else to it. He seemed upset that he wasn't going
to get his hands on it. Well, now he's going to. I wonder if they
will end up with a bunch of new appliances, etc. and if we'll get
yet another tour of an appliance store!
|
4.191 | Odd.. | MEMORY::FARRELL | Joe Farrell, ESD Methods, SHR01-3/020 | Fri Mar 18 1988 17:40 | 7 |
|
The lanscape architect made a unique statement on last nights
show. He said the lanscaping work will be put out to bid. I guess that
means they aren't going to hire some big buck outfit to do the work....
|
4.192 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | the Gort | Sat Mar 19 1988 00:09 | 6 |
| I toured the castle last march it is very impressive. I dident think
the tour price was that high as my enjoyment of the tour balanced
the price i.e. I dont mind spending a few bucks for a good time.
-j
|
4.193 | Hearst's castle: go if you can, reserve a place well in advance | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Sat Mar 19 1988 12:39 | 17 |
| The Hearst Castle tours do make money for the State of California -
but I doubt if they make enough to cover the loss from other public
sites, which generally do *not* make money (in fact, Hearst's Castle
may be the only one that does show a profit). The place is fantastic,
in the literal sense of the word - worth every penny the tours cost.
Larry
PS - Of course they have more than one tour - you'd have to be there
all day to see the whole thing in one tour.
PPS - It would take more than a Megabucks ticket to be able to afford
a place like Hearst's Castle. In his heyday he was earning $1M/month
and spending it all. Also, he was buying art objects at 1% or less of
the price they would command today (in some cases .1% or better).
|
4.194 | The Original Norm | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Did you see that?! | Mon Mar 21 1988 15:42 | 13 |
|
Channel 11 ran another marathon TOH this past weekend for their
fund-raising effort. I believe it was the vacation house with post
and beam construction. It sounded as if they may do more of this
type of showing in the future.
They also mentioned that they would be showing the *very first* TOH
show or series. I didn't catch all the details, dang it! Did anybody
else get it? What caught my ear were the words "see how Norm and
Bob have changed over the years". I also think a reference was
made to Norm's physique!!
Phil
|
4.195 | | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Mon Mar 21 1988 15:57 | 3 |
| The "original" TOH was in 1982 and was a large victorian in Dorchester
-a residential community of Boston. I don't think Channel 11 stated
when that show would be being repeated.
|
4.196 | TRUCKS | GRINS::MCFARLAND | | Mon Mar 21 1988 16:26 | 9 |
| Regarding the truck. Bob and Norm drove their trucks to California.
Bob flies home every weekend to take care of business here. Don't
know about Norm but I would expect that he would tag along with
Bob.
Judie
|
4.197 | | TOLKIN::RIDGE | | Wed Mar 23 1988 15:26 | 8 |
| regarding the Hurst Castle:
I went on one of the tours several years ago. It was worth it. The
tours are rated by length of walk. I went on the short tour, one
or two miles. They have a three mile tour and a five mile tour.
Next time I'm there, if ever, I'll take the next longest tour.
It's interesting when you see an old hollywood movie, and you
recognize, the set as the Hurst Castle.
|
4.198 | | JUNIOR::PELTONEN | The Waiting is the Hardest Part | Wed Mar 23 1988 18:56 | 32 |
| If nothing else, a visit to the Hearst Castle (or the "ranch")
will definitly help get your perspectives in order....no matter
what you got, somebody always has something better! :-)
I took the tour a few years ago. What impressed me even more than
the opulance was just the peace and serenity of that hilltop retreat.
It was so quiet up there, Hearst literally had his own little world.
The tour guide also will point out how much changing went on, the
large pool outside was ripped up a couple times at least. Other
changes "on the fly" made the project even more expensive than
necessary, if that is possible. Hearst also spent megabucks on the
flora and fauna.....most plants and trees are domestic to exotic
locations around the world, all were shipped and transplanted.
Other interesting notes; Hearst toured the world in search of all
those arches, ceilings, etc....how about a *real* cathedral ceiling?
Right out of a real cathedral, damaged in a bombing attack. And
the statues, the tour guide pointed one out that was "there when
Moses walked by"......incredible!
A point they will stress on the tours..."Dont touch!" Matter of
fact, they didn't even allow flash pictures! ASA 400 only...I got
a real kick out of Mr Touchy-Feeley, Bob Vila....that sucker had
his hands all over everything...I could just feel the curator
seeting inside.....show Bob a table and chairs, he pulls a chair
out of the line and puts it back out of sequence...show him a bed
and he's got his hands all over the bedpost...etc, etc.....what
a crass individual! I agree with all I've read here, Bob is one
of the most abrasive people around.
Dana
|
4.199 | It's almost time for our favorite show | MAGIC::COTE | | Thu Mar 24 1988 17:35 | 22 |
| Hey, it's Thursday, and you know what that means......
Wake the kids, call the neighbors, and get a can of your favorite
beverage. It's time for those two whacky guys and their gang of
home-remodelers.
What will they do next????? Will the home-owner go over the edge
and order them all off the site???? Will the baby move???? What
new horrors await the faithful???????
Will we visit a someplace interesting????? Will Bob keep his hands
to himself??? (probably not :-) Will we hear real dialog like
the guys who built my house used?????????? Are there French-Canadians
in California????? (none of my relatives :-)
Tune in tonight for the next exciting episode. Same Old-House-Channel,
same Old-House-Time.
Bill Cote'
|
4.200 | <Bob and Norms 25%> | TRACTR::FOSS | | Thu Mar 24 1988 19:27 | 9 |
| Last Sunday CH 11 in N.H. rana 5 hour special of TOH. It was the
one where they built a summer cottage. It was interesting to hear
Bob talking price with different real estate brokers and saying
things were out of their price range, they then went to Sweden and
did part of a show there. At the end of each episode CH 11 would
come on requesting donations to support their programing saying
that their costs for programs such as TOH had gone up 25%. Is this
to pay for cost over runs, legal expenses, or travel expenses to
California?
|
4.201 | another nifty tool? | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Mar 24 1988 23:07 | 8 |
| I hate to break the mood and ask a serious question, but what the hell...
A couple of weeks ago I saw Norm cutting the end off a beam and he used some
sort of guide to get a straight, right angle cut (gee - I thought he could cut
a straight line with his eyes closed!). Anyhow, it looked like a nifty tool.
Anyone have or used one?
-mark
|
4.202 | And... | ESD65::FARRELL | Joe Farrell, ESD Methods, SHR01-3/020 | Fri Mar 25 1988 00:18 | 12 |
|
From tonight's episode:
All new plumbing in the house, including a new sewer drain. The
next-door neighbor's driveway is ruined, crushed from the weight of
delivery trucks. Bob's been looking rather tired and the "get me out of
here look" is also present. Next week is the finale' (or fiasco). Oh, the
homeowner figures the cost now at $55k....
J
|
4.203 | very handy tool | FREDW::MATTHES | | Fri Mar 25 1988 11:15 | 9 |
| re .134 Seriously ...
They are called speed squares. Very handy tool. They come in 2
sizes a 6" and a 12". I find the larger size more convenient for
cutting lumber like Norm was doing. I've seen the smaller ones
in a kit - square, pencil, lether holster for square and pencil
for about $5 at JR's.
I paid about 6.99 and 11.99 for mine if memory serves.
|
4.204 | Do they ever say NO to donations??? | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Did you see that?! | Fri Mar 25 1988 15:57 | 13 |
|
Another gem from last night. An inground sprinkler system with
electronic controls in the house for a 14' x 20' area of lawn in
the front of the house. They installed *6* sprinkler heads! The
installer really stammered when Bob asked a half intelligent question;
"Do you need a sprinkler system for such a small area?"
"Sure, keeps the water off the walks, baloney, BS, etc..."
And when is Norm going to finish that stinking pergola????
Phil
|
4.205 | | HPSMEG::LUKOWSKI | I lost my A$$ in the '87 CRASH! | Fri Mar 25 1988 16:18 | 8 |
| re: -< Do they ever say NO to donations??? >-
Phil,
How else do you think they could have put such an elaborate system
into such a small area for $.80-$1.00 per sf. :^)
-Jim
|
4.206 | Rigid-pipe for Sprinklers? | BIMINI::SCHNEIDER | Dennis Schneider | Fri Mar 25 1988 17:12 | 8 |
| I guess the folks who TOOK the TOH "victim" for the sprinkler system had
never heard of a new and innovative technology - flexible pipe. They plumbed
the whole job with rigid PVC and solvent joints! The last time I saw a
hard-pipe plumbed sprinkler system was when they used copper. Black PVC
well pipe costs next to nothing, same for the fittings. You use a pipe pulling
machine to put it in the ground (no trenches).... WHAT A RIP OFF!!
|
4.207 | made me consider one | ARCHER::FOX | | Fri Mar 25 1988 17:21 | 5 |
| They should have seen the common sense people on HOMETIME install
a sprinkler system. They too used a lot of heads, but also flex
pipe and a pipe puller. Definately worth the rental fee.
John
|
4.208 | Was this episode better ????? | MAGIC::COTE | | Fri Mar 25 1988 19:22 | 26 |
| How do they figure an overrun of $5K???? A few weeks ago it sounded
like they were going to go a lot more over budget.
I did think that last night's show was better then most recent shows.
At least the shower pan stuff was new, the owners were involved,
and it was starting to come together.
Too bad about the old deck, and too bad about the new deck.
Bob did seem very broken up over the neighbor's driveway ;-). Yeah,
we'll thrown down some concrete and patch it up.
I just can't see why they need a sprinkler system, and why they
let those guys put it in, but it is California.
Anyone know what's next for TOH??? Did someone say they were going
to do the very first one again??? If you haven't seen it, it's
probably the best even though there aren't any owners to get screwed.
Norm is skinny too in the first one. Maybe it was Norm that crushed
the neighbor's driveway????
Tune in next week!
BC
|
4.209 | | UXB::TIMMONS | Hey, Oliva Nuther! | Sat Mar 26 1988 09:30 | 16 |
| Phew!! Just read this note from the start. I was very glad to
see that I'm not the only one who gets irritated when Bob touches
everything! He drives me crazy with that routine.
Did anyone notice in one episode that the yuppie was wearing a "Celtics
Buster" shirt? Tell me he doesn't know that the show originates
in Boston!! When I saw the storm damage in a later episode, I got
some satisfaction. I wouldn't wish this on anyone, but since it
already happened, I got some enjoyment out of it.
This note, and it's replies, have jogged my memory about the show.
I really used to enjoy it for it's informative format, but now it
really is for entertainment only. About the only thing I've seen
that interests me is that square for guiding a skill saw.
Lee
|
4.210 | | ULTRA::PRIBORSKY | That's the stuff dreams are made of. | Mon Mar 28 1988 14:12 | 11 |
| Be careful. I've used rigid PVC on two sprinkler systems of my
own. First, it's more freeze-resistant (not an issue in California,
probably) but as I recall, I got more GPM out of it since the inside
diameter was larger than the equivalent flexible pipe. Also, I
didn't feel comfortable using the flex stuff on pressure lines.
Re: freeze resistance: my neighbor in Colorado Springs had to
make repairs in his flex-tube every spring. I only had to make
one in five years. He had low spots (which I'm sure I had). But,
when mine did freeze, I had to replace a whole 10-foot section.
The stuff just shattered.
|
4.211 | Flex works for me. | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | House < $200k = Mass. Miracle | Mon Mar 28 1988 17:39 | 20 |
| re: .143
Just use the next bigger size pipe ;-). After the electric valves
I used all flexible pipe. Over 1000' of it (25000 sq ft of lawn).
I haven't had any problems with the flexible pipe, but the first
winter one of the hard plastic 'T's cracked (I think from tension,
not freezing) just before one of the electric valves so I replaced
everything up to the valves with copper. This is the second season,
so we will soon know how it faired. I blow the lines out with
compressed air every fall from a fitting in the basement. I rent
the compressor for $15 and it beats repairs.
I couldn't believe the rinky-dink set up these guys did, for $.80
to $1.00 per sq ft. Using my labor, mine came in at about $.04
per sq ft. I still am going to install a circuit for the shrubbery
around the foundation when I get money for the shrubs. :-) It looks
like a golf course being watered with the large heads I used. It
looked great last year during the dry summer.
Stan
|
4.212 | California couple seemed please it was over | KLAATU::BERUBE | Claude G. Berube | Fri Apr 01 1988 12:02 | 16 |
| Well they wrapped up the California series last night and guess what
Norm actually discussed cost with the homeowner. Final cost came out
to (or will when finally done, still a lot to do)
Donations $80,000
Homeowner $57,500
-------
Total $137,500
The plumber must of really gave them a good deal since he stated on the
show he wouldn't of touch that job normally for under $20,000. I only
wished we could of heard what the real cost breakdown were, like
raising the house etc. after each peice was done instead of hearing
estimate prior to the work being done.
Claude
|
4.213 | | PSTJTT::TABER | Do not be ruled by thumbs | Fri Apr 01 1988 12:37 | 13 |
| What bothers me is that the week before the owner said they were only
$5,000 over budget in their $50,000 original budget. Obviously, he was
talking money that he had to pay out, not the cost of the job. He
actually spent almost three times his budget, he just didn't have to
cough it up!! (I'll bet his local IRS office has that bottom line on
video tape...)
After the show (at least on channel 2 in Boston) the booth announcer put
in a plug for next week being the rebroadcast of the very first This Old
House. He put it "...back to basics." Since they've just finished
their pledge drive, maybe enough people suggested they do just that.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
4.214 | the networks should make a sit-com out of this | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Fri Apr 01 1988 12:56 | 21 |
| At the end of the episode they flashed a quick itemized expense sheet on the
screen. I'm gonna tape it Saturday night so I can do a freeze-frame and get a
closer look. All I really saw was DESIGN WORK -$12000!!! That's absurd!
Two things caught my attention -
o That amazing sprinkler system that could easily pay for itself
in the water it saved was totally soaking the sidewalks
o The assembley of the deck was not to be missed. The clowns
doing the nailing had about as much skill as my 6 year old
(actually I think my son has MORE skill). People were bending
nails, breaking hammers, etc. It looked more like a nursery
school. We're talking MAJOR humor, even though it only lasted
2-3 minutes.
Also, good ol' Bob had what looked like three teams putting
down boards and presumably meeting somewhere in the middle.
That struck me as just plain dumb!
-mark
|
4.215 | roof nail holder ?? | FREDW::MATTHES | | Fri Apr 01 1988 13:02 | 15 |
| Half of those donations must have been in the plants. Jeeeeesh,
on a postage stmap lot - must look like a jungle when thy're done.
Do they ever attempt to fit the house into the rest of the
neighborhood? Or is this an attempt at peer pressure on the part
of the landscaper so that he can come back and sell the rest of
the neighbors?
Remember the guy doing the roof (may not have been this house)?
He had a little metal tray nailholder hung around his neck. Shook
it a little and it lined up the roofing nails so that he could grab
4 real quick and tap tap tap. I find doing a roof that is the most
time consuming part is to get the nails out of a nail pouch. Anyone
ever seen anything like that on the market. I thought it was a
great idea.
|
4.216 | Thinks he's paid by the hour maybe... | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Fri Apr 01 1988 13:16 | 8 |
| RE: -1
I saw that little nail gizmo too, (yes it was the ca. episode)
but I was wondering why the guy wasn't using a pneumatic nail gun.
He said he had alot of experience doing roofing, but not too many
contractors do this by hand anymore. Even Norm 'Master Carpenter
Ant' Abram has been seen on occasion to use the pneumatic nail gun.
|
4.217 | tearing shingles with nail gun??? | FREDW::MATTHES | | Fri Apr 01 1988 13:38 | 16 |
| I don't like to use a nail gun for roofing shingles. The 'staple'
that the machine's use I'm told don't hold as well and have a tendency
to tear the shingle more than hand nailing.
Here it is clearly quantity vs quality. I don't have experience
using the nail guns but my very experienced neighbor told me this
when I was getting ready to re-roof. Since I wanted to do the job
only once and have it last 20 years or more, I declined to try the
newer technology.
It's quite possible that the technology has improved somewhat since
his experience. I'd be careful of the adjustment of the gun that
it's not driving the nail too far.
Hey what is this ???? We've degraded this note to a serious
discussion!!
|
4.218 | | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Fri Apr 01 1988 14:25 | 18 |
|
Re: .147
> DESIGN WORK -$12000!!! That's absurd!
I *knew* that architect's scale model didn't come cheap. But the price
isn't really out of line for an architect. Architects often get paid as
a percentage of the total job and 10% is not unheard of. Thus an
architect is often not really interested in keeping costs down. And
that's why it's sometimes a better idea for DIYers to hire a designer
and pay an hourly rate.
I liked the part where Bob said his job was to calm people down when
they got too stressed out. My take was that he caused most of the stress.
I was also surprised that Bob didn't tell the nailing crew that the
nails go in point first.
JP
|
4.219 | Pneumatic nailer = significant current draw | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | DECnet-VAX | Fri Apr 01 1988 14:48 | 9 |
| If you remember the house's electrical system, you may understand
why the roof guy didn't use a pneumatic nailer. When we had a
detached garage/workshop built recently, long before Boston Edison
deigned to supply any electricity for it, the carpenters ran
heavy extension cords from the main house to the work site. They
blew about five fuses in a row trying to use their pneumatic
nailer until they found a 20 amp dedicated circuit (designed
for a nonexistent freezer) in the utility room. The things draw
18 amps when they blow.
|
4.220 | Roofers with guns???? | MAGIC::COTE | | Fri Apr 01 1988 15:37 | 47 |
| My brother-in-law owns a roofing company and a general contracting
outfit, and he HATES the pneumatic nailers. His crews have used
them on roofing jobs and for framing, but he feels they (the nailers)
are more trouble than their worth.
For roofing, he says they (the nailers) get gummed up from the
shingles. He also says that his crews are dangerous enough with
regular hammers. His insurance costs would be higher if he used
nailers too.
I asked him about the fancy shingles that were used on the TOH
bungalow. His comment was that he didn't think his crews could handle
the complexity of the "books" and that he'd have to charge too much
to put it on. BTW, because of the shortage in skilled help in his
area, he often times hires people who are getting out of the state
prison in his town.
I don't want to say that his employees are unusual, but recently
one of his 4-person crews got thrown out of a Dunkin Donuts shop
because of their behavior.
I guess roofing is a pretty rough business to be in. The risks
are pretty high, and if you don't do things right in every aspect
of the business you can loose very big. Last fall, he sent a crew
to do a roof on an old cape style house. He said the house was
real nice, a lot of antiques and stuff inside, and the wanted copper
valleys on the roof and stuff like that. One of the crew fell from
a ladder about 15 feet. That was bad enough, but the ladder went
through a window and wiped out a collection of antique dishes.
The rest of the crew decided to take the guy that fell off the ladder
to the hospital in one of the trucks. They drove it over the leech
field, crushing it (the leech field, not the truck). On the way
to the hospital, they got into an accident (a fender bender), but
enough to put the truck out of commission. He figures that his
insurance cost is going to at least double next year if he can get
coverage at all.
Now, can you imagine these guys running around with nail guns?????
I also asked him about the cute little nail holder that the guy
had around his neck. He just smiled...
Sorry for getting off the subject.
Bill
|
4.221 | The actual bill | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Did you see that?! | Fri Apr 01 1988 16:16 | 21 |
|
Design Fees $12,500
Masonry 1,900 / $3000 fixtures
Lumber & Materials 18,000 / 5200 pipes & fittings
Plumbing & Heating 17,800< 1200 furnace &water Heater
Windows & Doors 3,000 \ 8400 labor
Rubbish Removal 1,700 \
Tile & Labor 8,500
Paint Supplies 3,200
Shower, etc. 700
Dishwasher 450
Carpet 3,500
Plants & Landscaping 9,000
Misc. 300
-------
Total Donations $80,550
Owner costs 57,500
-------
Total $138,050
|
4.222 | Bob and Norm operating cost ??? | TOOK::ARN | | Fri Apr 01 1988 16:23 | 5 |
| Was that $80,000 in materials and $50,000 worth of beer
and munchies that Bob and Norm ate out of their frig ???
Tim
|
4.223 | Enuf already! | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Fri Apr 01 1988 16:28 | 4 |
| I move that this discussion be closed.
All those in favor...
All those opposed...
|
4.224 | I thougth the $300 misc was the beer tab | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Fri Apr 01 1988 16:31 | 1 |
| -mark
|
4.225 | After Weatherby, Light comedy segment... | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Did you see that?! | Fri Apr 01 1988 16:42 | 10 |
| I think the entire purpose of the California project was to get
Bob and Norm a tan and vacation in CA. In five episodes, I don't
think they should 1 or 2 interesting things about the house they
were working on. The is clearly entertainment which was confirmed
by the inclusion of the "hammering crew" scene. Quite hilarious
watching people bang a nail 30 - 40 times and still not have it
halfway in. Haven't seen so many bent nails since the last time
I built something.... ;-)
Phil
|
4.226 | | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Fri Apr 01 1988 16:47 | 4 |
| I definately vote to keep this note open. I need a good laugh every week.
Besides, NEXT UNSEEN is easy enough to do.
-mark
|
4.227 | Let's keep this topic open, I need the chuckle | KLAATU::BERUBE | Claude G. Berube | Fri Apr 01 1988 17:21 | 11 |
| reply to < Note 1974.154 by VINO::GRANSEWICZ "Did you see that?!" >
Yeah but when you add up the itemized bill they showed, it only comes
out to about $80K, where did the extra $57K or so go into? production
cost of the show?
It didn't list the cost of the Electrician (he stated something about
3K), Raising/Lowering the House to name a few item left out in the
final tally.
Claude
|
4.228 | sour grapes | 3D::BOYACK | nothin's easy | Fri Apr 01 1988 17:32 | 14 |
| For shame people, this TOH can only be labled a success. Only 7 grand
more than the owner expected to pay is under budget for TOH. The house
looks fairly decent, too (even if more eclectic than craftsman).
Maybe them Califunnians can't bang nails, but they seemed to do more
than most TOH victims. Finally, I thought the Bob-the-boob and
plant-man exchange was the capper...like it was "typical-Vila-I-
memorized-all-the-terminology-one-upmanship" vs "who-cares-dude-
you're-still-a-jerk." Naw, don't terminate this note. Vila will
be back, his ego wouldn't let him do otherwise, and obviously the
crew at GBH thinks TOH epitomizes DIYing (I have this image of that
white-haired old drip of a GBH-mucky-muck with the Ichabod Crane nose
and Boston-Brahmin-pseudo-Brit accent describing the deck-building
segment as "quaint.")
|
4.229 | Channel 2's best comedy show | AIMHI::BERNARD | | Fri Apr 01 1988 17:33 | 57 |
|
This last episode had to be the funniest ever. Did you ever hear
some so excited about a new dishwasher? And the nailing crew sequence.
Try running it in fast forward. Where did they find these people??
And how in the world can you break a hammer putting in a nail!!
Did you notice they all had on their designer shorts to nail in
decking. I imagine there were some sore knees the next day. And
Villa giving directions "keep bark side out" he says. They all looked
at him like he had 2 heads. "But the boards don't have bark on them"
you could hear them thinking........
This would have been the ideal job for the power nailer, but that
would have taken all the fun out if it.
It was nice to see the ladies Dad get some credit for the work he'd
done. He sure looked like he'd spent a lot of after hour time with
the Bob'si Twins. It almost sounded like he interupped a liquid
lunch to stand on a ladder and say "you bet I would!!"
Have you noticed that we haven't seen Norm standing for a while.
He always seems to be behind something or squating down. Maybe the
CA physiques have made him bashful about his rather substantial
girth.
I thought the landscaping was atrocious. Can you imagine what their
little son is going to do to all "those delicate" plans in the back
yard. Just picture his toy tractors digging them up, and his bike
rolling over them.
Somehow I didn't get the feeling that the plumber was all too thrilled
about how much he "helped" out. Comsmopolitan Rich Trethewy really
moved him right through that sequence. It probably took about 10
takes to get all the explitaves out.
Also does it seem dumb to put a flowering vine like a wisteria (sp?)
right over the door? Doesn't it attract a lot of bees, birds nests
(and subsequent droppings) etc..
I am really glad they finally showed costs again. I spent $300
to get my dormer plans done. $12,000 is just too much for a cardboard
model. And $8,500 for tiling!!!!!! My Goodness......
I'm rather sorry to see the season end and even TOH get into reruns.
I wonder where the next project of the new season will be? Perhaps
they can redo an igloo in Alaska, or make a high tech grass hut in Hawaii.
We should gather our suggestions for the next projects and send
them in. I offered to let them help with my full dormer last year,
but was told, like others in the conference, that I was too far
away from the studio. When I mentioned that I wasn't too far away
to donate I at least got a personal letter of rejection instead
of the bloody form letter.
Anyway great show, always good for laughs. Maybe Villa and Norm
will be on Cheers soon.
JMB
|
4.230 | better than the soaps | USWAV3::FAGERBERG | | Fri Apr 01 1988 17:34 | 4 |
|
I haven't seen this week's episode yet ( as the stomach turns
or the young and the senseless )...did Norm finish that fancy
arborway??? How did it look????
|
4.231 | another time, another channel | USMAIL::DUNN | | Fri Apr 01 1988 18:19 | 7 |
|
I know there is a schedule in here somewhere, but I can't find
it. Could someone please tell me when this show will be on again?
I have got to see the nailing scene.
|
4.232 | Does TFH have the right formula now? | HPSTEK::EKOKERNAK | | Fri Apr 01 1988 18:59 | 10 |
| I just finally read my MARCH issue of The Family Handyman. It had
a great article about turning a 1950's tract house into a reasonable
1980's home for about $57,000 cash and a lot of true sweat equity.
The only problem with the article is it was not in video format.
What they did was bump out the house in four places. All interior
decorating out of the Sears catalog. Not for yuppies, but a big
winner for real people. I'm tempted to send the article to GBH
and explain that this is what I'd like to see on TOH.
Elaine
|
4.233 | How about some reality... | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Fri Apr 01 1988 19:36 | 10 |
|
It seems that every winter (or is it just my imagination) TOH
goes south, west, or SOMEPLACE warm to do a project. Do people
in other parts of the country think that construction shuts down
at the first snowfall? I'd really like to see Bob and Norm doing
some huffing and puffing to keep warm on a nice outdoor winter
project. Just like the real guys have to do.
Unrespectfully yours,
Jon
|
4.234 | TOH schedule | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Did you see that?! | Fri Apr 01 1988 19:56 | 5 |
| RE: .164
Complete TOH and Hometime schedule is in note 621.2
Phil
|
4.235 | | SARAH::P_DAVIS | Peter Davis | Fri Apr 01 1988 20:38 | 12 |
| What I'd like to know is: Where does the $80,000 in donation come
from? Is it:
1. donations from building suppliers, in exchange for having their
names mentioned on the show,
2. cash donations from concerned citizens,
3. part of the money the WGBH members contribute,
or all of the above? If it's 3, they're not getting any more of my
money. I have my own home improvements to worry about.
|
4.236 | 1. = Weyerhauser! | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | | Mon Apr 04 1988 12:52 | 4 |
| How do you think Weyerhauser gets that nifty blurb at the beginning
and end of TOH on "non-commercial" TV?
Stan
|
4.237 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | the Gort | Tue Apr 05 1988 04:11 | 5 |
| re.148
That nail gizmo can be bought at home club here in the springs
and they do make nailing much faster.
-j
|
4.34 | Original This Old House Episodes | NSSG::FEINSMITH | | Fri Apr 08 1988 14:50 | 7 |
| For anybody who is interested, Ch 2 in Boston has begun rerunning
the original "This Old House" series (14 episodes about the house
in Dorchester) beginning last night (part 1 will be rerun on Saturday).
These were the days when TOH did what it was originally supposed
to do.
Eric
|
4.35 | Even funnier than California | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Fri Apr 08 1988 15:06 | 16 |
4.36 | Where did TOH go astray? Last night looked good! | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Did you see that?! | Fri Apr 08 1988 16:43 | 14 |
|
First, I'd like to say, "Nice hat Bob!"
I wish I had a dollar for every time the appraiser said, "That's
got to go."
Ahhhh, the good ol' days when Bob Vila was concerned about costs!!!
A $30,000 rehab??? The last few projects, $30K wouldn't have covered
the shrubs!
I was disappointed that Norm wasn't on the show. We'll have to
wait until next week to his under-250 look...
Phil
|
4.37 | TOH : then and now... | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Fri Apr 08 1988 16:56 | 5 |
|
I want to see if he is introduced as 'Master Carpenter Ant'
Norm Abram, or if that title came in subsequent episodes of TOH.
Maybe someone should tape his entrance, and then frmezeframe his
'then and now' profiles, and send them to him via OBH.
|
4.38 | | TOPDOC::PHILBROOK | Chico's Daddy | Fri Apr 08 1988 17:27 | 6 |
| That guy was funny - he must have said "That's all shot!" about
100 times!
I'm looking forward to seeing the next 14 weeks, should be fun.
Mike
|
4.39 | have YOU looked at you highschool pics? | USWAV3::FAGERBERG | | Fri Apr 08 1988 17:30 | 8 |
|
I guess I'll join this brutality and beat up on Bob...did you see
how ill at ease he was with the cameras? Stepping backwards and
forwards must have drove the camera***(person) crazy! Were they
cameramen in 1979?? Also, did you catch the business he was in??
Buying and rehabbing old houses?? How quickly one can lose his
humble beginnings!!
|
4.40 | buy for 3k + 60k = sell for 47k | FREDW::MATTHES | | Fri Apr 08 1988 17:34 | 21 |
| The realtor (I thought he was an appraiser) said at the end "Well,
Bob, You got it for 3 and you'll put in 60; surely you'll be able
to sell it for 47."
I loved the "That's shot. Oh yuh, that's all gone. That's all
gotta come out."
"Gee Bob. I've got this great house for you out in California.
Sech a deel, you wouldn't believe ..."
And you talk about obtuse!! When they were in the kitchen talking
about these "crummy old linoleum cabinets, etc." I could just picture
this couple who were just able to squeeze out enough to get into
their first house bursting with pride turning on the tube to get
some ideas and dream a little. There's no way they're going to
do anything for at least 5 years but their house is similar to the
one on this ole house. They watch the kitchen episode and turn
around to look at the same cabs in their kitchen.
Really Bob. They're crummy to you and what you can turn them into
but everything's relative.
|
4.41 | | ULTRA::PRIBORSKY | That's the stuff dreams are made of. | Mon Apr 11 1988 12:47 | 4 |
| Well, those of you who don't religiously tape (or stay up late and
watch) David Letterman missed Bob and Norm at their comedic best.
I think it was on Wednesday night. They built some screen "doors"
live and in color. They even let Letterman use a hammer.
|
4.42 | TOH retro-fit??? | VLNVAX::SUMNER | Senility has set in | Tue Apr 12 1988 00:54 | 10 |
| I saw the Letterman rerun. Was it my imagination or did it look
like Letterman knew what he was doing? Anybody else out there want
to see Letterman & co. replace Bob & Norm? I'm not a great Letterman
fan but I think his aggressive humor would *really* make TOH worth
watching! Think of it, replace "stupid pet tricks" with "stupid
things done by do-it-yourselfers" or how about Larry Bud Melman
as the "House doctor" on a Q & A session? Any other ideas?
Glenn
|
4.43 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | the Gort | Tue Apr 12 1988 07:43 | 6 |
| I liked it when bob or was it norm said "of course we do things
they dont like/want" a real honest "sc&^w 'em if they dont like
it" attitude.
-j
|
4.44 | Series Has a Book | SALEM::PAGLIARULO | | Tue Apr 12 1988 13:27 | 11 |
| I've got the "This Old House" book that was taken from this series of
episodes. Anyone want to know the final cost of the rehab now or would
you rather wait.
I thought it was funny when they were looking at the garage that
they thought was a very nice building. In the book Villa's
first look at the house was described as seeing this perfect old house
with lots of possibilities....flanked by this really hideous garage.
I wonder if cost of replacement made him change his mind? :-)
George
|
4.45 | Series has video ? | MPGS::ROGUSKA | | Wed Apr 13 1988 12:17 | 9 |
| Just as an aside, according to my husband, ie second hand information
I have not seen it, the Framingham Public Library (MA) has a video of
the Dorchester house episodes of TOH. I am assuming that it is the
same house that is on the current series.
So if you're impatient......
Kathy
|
4.46 | What goes around.... | FHQ::HICKOX | Stow Vice | Fri Apr 15 1988 02:32 | 5 |
|
It was really great to see Bob put in his place, that appraiser
really ran circles around him, made Bob look the same way he now
makes the new DIY'ers look on his newer shows.
|
4.47 | You can dress him up, but.... | CYGNUS::VHAMBURGER | Common Sense....isn't | Fri Apr 15 1988 13:21 | 19 |
|
Have you noticed how Bob walks thru the house and keeps looking back
over his shoulder like someone is going to bite him? He is definately
camera shy at this stage and hasn't gotten used to being photographed. He
also reads his cue cards poorly, last nite it was a struggle to
concentrate on what he was saying for all his rapid eye movements to the
side of the camera...
Lastly, he can't keep his hands still, maybe that is where he got his
bad habits of touching everything in sight.....
In Bob's defense, I have been on camera (Local cable) and its not easy
the first few times......
FWIW....my wife thinks his hat is the funniest thing she has ever
seen....
Vic
|
4.48 | The Good Old House Days | LDP::BURKHART | | Fri Apr 15 1988 14:04 | 16 |
| I don't know which is worst; Bob the Know-it-all (1988) or
Bob the Know-nothing-at-all (1979).
Rule #1 of demolition: Kill the electricity!
In the show a few years back (also a marathon show) he was showing
homeowner how to remove palster from wall in kitchen using a shovel.
And just as he hit the electrical outlet they changed to a diffrent
shot. Well I had recoreded this show so I checked it out in slow
motion and sure enough sparks all over.
I love the prices they talk about and the sub-titles explaining
that this was the good old days of 1979.
...Dave
|
4.49 | "I'm a professional, I know what i am doing" | SALEM::AMARTIN | nemow SDEEN srraM | Mon Apr 18 1988 04:40 | 8 |
| I loved the way bob was (gak, spit, chock) working.
The thing with the outlet was priceless. This guy knows what he
is doing.
Hey, did anyone notice that norm DID have the "gut" then also?
Nice hat bob. :-)
|
4.50 | Norm before his promotion... | DECEAT::HARRINGTON | | Tue Apr 19 1988 00:45 | 6 |
|
It was also interesting to see that Norm was a mere "Head Carpenter",
not yet a "Master Carpenter"...that must have come after Bob taught
him all his demolition tricks.
Dan
|
4.51 | | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Tue Apr 19 1988 19:52 | 15 |
|
Re: .14
>Rule #1 of demolition: Kill the electricity!
Yeah, or as Bob calls it, "deemo." He *knew* the power was on, too --
when he took off a baseboard, he said you had to be real careful until
the electrician comes to shut off the power. Sheesh. He wouldn't have
been the first guy to get killed swinging a crowbar into a live wire...
And did anyone notice as Bob "touchy-feely" Vila leaned against,
scratched his back on, and then ran his bare hands all over the
asbestos-covered furnace and pipes?
JP
|
4.52 | Don't Miss It! | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | | Thu Apr 28 1988 12:59 | 11 |
| Here is your chance greater Boston TOH aficinados! Meet one of the
Dynamic Duo in person! Mr. Norm Abram, the Master Carpenter Ant
himself, will be available to you for questions and admiration!
Ask him about your DIY projects in person. Things like:
"Norm, how can I build a "front porch" just like yours?"
He will be at the Home and Garden Show at the Northeast Trade Center
Saturday, April 30.
Stan
|
4.53 | The History Of Home Remodeling | LDP::BURKHART | | Fri Apr 29 1988 19:46 | 24 |
|
I just caught another episode of original TOH. I can't believe the
prices back in 1979, If we only knew how much more it would cost us in 1988.
They quoted a price of $3500 for 2 licensed plumbers for 12 days
work. That works out to $18/hour based on a 8 hour day.
The best part had to be Bob knocking down that wall and standing in
the dust. Cough...cough... the dust will clear a moment... cough...
cough... I better move...
Did any one else see how concerned they were about asbestos back
in 1979. Well just knock this asbestos covered boiler over raise all
kind of dust take a sledge hammer and brake it up into little pieces
and throw it in the dump. Big difference from the 1988 Weatherbee
house; Seal house in plastic bubble, put in air filtration system to
collect asbestos dust, send in men in space suits and SCUBA gear, wet
all the asbestos down to prevent dust, place it all in plastic bags
and take to hazardous waste disposal site.
Isn't history fun?
...Dave
|
4.54 | A true classic! | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | | Fri Apr 29 1988 20:12 | 15 |
| That was a classic. I thought Bob wasn't going to be able to push
over the wall. Then you could hardly see him through the dust.
He had about 4 explanations why it was O.K. to have the dining room
on the opposite end of the house from the kitchen. Another 4 for
how all the floor plans had completely changed in the last week.
The closing line was also a classic -- "Tune in next week and we
will see if so-and-so (the plumber) gets paid". I could just see
the guy bopping Bob after the camera was shut off.
I was doing a running commentary to my wife that sounded just like
your (.19) note. "The times, they are a-changin..."
Stan
|
4.55 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Sat Apr 30 1988 11:41 | 9 |
| Did anybody else wonder why they didn't just build the new wall cockeyed
to match the old wall, instead of pulling the top of old wall out?
Dispite Norm's assurances that it was "okay" to reduce the bearing
area of the ceiling joists by approx. 1/2, I think I would have just
built the new wall so it was tilted to match the old one. Either
that or figure out a way to get the WHOLE HOUSE vertical again.
What he did struck me as a rather kludgy way of dealing with the
problem.
|
4.56 | Just wait till the next hurricane | ASD::DIGRAZIA | | Sun May 01 1988 01:20 | 16 |
|
Re .21 -
Exactly! When Norm said something about there still being
a couple of inches of joists bearing on the wall, I thought
"Hey, Norm! What happens when the house moves another couple
of inches?" Maybe the structure is tensioned now, so it won't
move, but I wouldn't spend much time under those joists.
Did you notice how easily the wall moved? Weren't the joists
toenailed to the wall header?
Well, it's been 9 years, and WBZ TV hasn't had Eyewitness news
out in Dorchester with live pictures of a house falling down...
Regards, Robert.
|
4.17 | See how much weight Norm lost in '79 ? | MENTOR::REG | May Be ('til June 1st) | Mon May 02 1988 18:34 | 8 |
|
Well, they've been rerunning the old ones recently on Channel
2 (Boston, Mass) and its interesting to see how "practical/relavant"
the old series used to be. Well, bashing an old asbestos covered
boiler out of the basement wasn't very smart, even in '79, and Bobby
really should have worn eye protection and a breathing filtre when
smacking that wall down, and...., etc.
|
4.18 | One more Whack oughta do it... | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Did you see that?! | Mon May 02 1988 19:25 | 9 |
| And the LAST place I would have been was inside that house while
some guy winched and Norm sledged the bearing wall out an inch and
a half! (Sure there's a lot of joist left there Norm!) I think
they gained an appreciation of life as they got older...
Phil
P.S. Was that Rich Tretheway's brother??? They nust have gotten
rid of him in later shows because of his high estimates!
|
4.19 | A young Richard? | LEPAGE::LEPAGE | | Tue May 03 1988 11:51 | 14 |
| RE:
> P.S. Was that Rich Tretheway's brother??? They nust have gotten
> rid of him in later shows because of his high estimates!
I thought it might have been his father! In fact, I could swear I
caught a glimpse of a much younger Rich, with a beard, moving the
furnace with a couple of other guys. It was a very quick scene,
but I remarked to my wife about it. Anyone got it on tape and care
to check it out?
-Mark
|
4.20 | The bearded one was Rich | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Tue May 03 1988 12:33 | 2 |
| yes it was Rich. Rich's father/brother called him Richard when he
asked him to push over the furnace.
|
4.21 | | CURIE::BBARRY | | Tue May 03 1988 13:47 | 12 |
| < Was that Rich Tretheway's brother??? They nust have gotten
< rid of him in later shows because of his high estimates!
.19 and .20 are right. A younger and skinnier Rich helped push the boiler over.
Who caters this show any ways. At this rate Bob, Norn and Rich will die of
heart failure within the year.
Did everyone notice how much subtlier they were about advertising. If you look
out the kitchen window you could see "Tretheway Brothers Plumbing" on the side
of their truck. Alot different then the California House this year.
Brian
|
4.57 | Phooey on your hurricane.. | USWAV3::FAGERBERG | | Tue May 03 1988 14:19 | 7 |
|
Well time has proven they haven'y done anything wrong structurally.
What I noticed is that that is old dimension lumber and that the
new wall was 2x6 construction. And those joists were large. If
only they built houses like that today (of course with all the new
energy and comfort stuff).
|
4.238 | Wetting the walkways keeps the dust down. | SCOMAN::RUDMAN | What was your first clue? | Tue May 03 1988 14:42 | 13 |
| re: .166 Damn right! Our full dormer was finished (contractor &
carpeting) in mid-December. (Instead of mid-October.)
And we're lucky the plaster didn't get hurt when he fell
thru/off the makeshift stairs. I can just see Norm lying
there, muttering: "Musta bin a defective tree." and Bob
handing him a beer for 'medicinal purposes'.
re: .154 I wonder if the neighbor's driveway was included in the
'Masonry' & 'Rubbish Removal' costs. I laughed, but I'd
sure sober up in a hurry if a GBH crew pulled up next door.
Don (who's still
wallpapering)
|
4.58 | Don't work on my house!! | ATEAM::COVIELLO | | Fri May 13 1988 11:34 | 11 |
| anybody catch last night show where bob had both 2x10 and 2x12 and
was saying something about the 2x10 not being starong enough.
also the end of the show where he answered some letters that were
written about the first episode about not shutting electricity off
and that the kitchen was unpractical per a womans point of view.
anybody want to take a guess why norm didn't bolt the sills for
the bulkhead down?
paul
|
4.59 | Be fair... | PSTJTT::TABER | Reach out and whack someone | Fri May 13 1988 14:23 | 16 |
| > anybody catch last night show where bob had both 2x10 and 2x12 and
> was saying something about the 2x10 not being starong enough.
All he said was they weren't the same height. You'd agree with that,
yes? Since they weren't the same height, the strapping that was
supposed to hold the ceiling up was only attached at the 2x12's, which
didn't provide enough support. That's why he was nailing little
extenders to the 2x10's so the strapping could be nailed to those and
thus hold a sheetrock ceiling with no flex.
I'm amazed to see the difference between this show and the two latest
ones they've done. Bob keeps talking about simple things you can do
yourself to save money. He never mentioned money on the last two shows
other than to explain that $100,000 overruns don't count 'cause it was
"donated" material.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
4.60 | The bulkhead door | VIDEO::AXELROD | | Tue May 17 1988 14:40 | 15 |
| I stumbled onto that episode and was fascinated to watch them struggle
with their Gordon steel replacement bulkhead door. I know it's a
Gordon because I bought the same thing last fall and had the same
problems (8 years later!). Norm pounded on the door to get the hinge
pins to go into the hinges; mine had many brazing metal spatters on
the hinges that I had to grind and file to make them fit. And Bob
finally had to make Norm stop fooling around with the alignment between
the two doors. I guess it can be adjusted, but not in realtime on TV.
I mention this both to take the pressure off the show (because the
product surprised me in exactly the same way) and to comment on good
old fashioned American values: develop a good product and then blow it
with sloppy workmanship. Maybe I'll write that letter to Gordon.
Glenn
|
4.239 | Country Home | AKOV11::THORP | | Wed Aug 24 1988 15:59 | 2 |
| The issue of Country Home magazine featuring the Weatherbee farm
restoration is on the newstand now.
|
4.61 | Safety last | NHL::MARCHETTI | Mama said there'd be days like this. | Wed Aug 24 1988 18:10 | 6 |
| There was a marathon TOH on Ch 2 last Thursday. Did anybody notice
Norm make a freehand cut on a table saw withOUT a saw guard and
withOUT rolling up his sleeves! It's a wonder he still has all
his fingers.
Bob
|
4.62 | Safety, yes; Paranoia, no | AKOV75::CRAMER | | Wed Aug 24 1988 20:05 | 13 |
| re: .27
I'm all for safety, however, blade guards on table saws are by no
means a panacea. They make it harder to see the work and can, therefore
encourage unsafe operation. This is especially true in free hand
work where you HAVE to watch what your doing, rather than just using
a fence.
As far as long sleeves go, as long as they were normal shirt sleeves
with the cuffs buttoned they are completely safe. The only safety
hazzard with long sleeves is when they are flapping in the breeze.
Alan
|
4.63 | | HPSCAD::KNEWTON | This Space For Rent | Wed Aug 24 1988 20:30 | 6 |
| I watched that too. He did mention where you should place your
hands to be safe.
Watching someone do it that way would still make me nervous, though.
Kathy
|
4.240 | | SCOMAN::RUDMAN | WhenIcomedownherehada#formyname... | Mon Sep 19 1988 19:14 | 7 |
| Sure it wasn't COUNTRY LIVING? Since they were the ones who
did the interior decorating, there was no mention of the controversy.
I have to wonder if the furnishings were furnished for the shooting
(bad choice of words--photo session) only....
Don
|
4.241 | New season's first project | NAC::GODDARD | | Fri Nov 11 1988 14:47 | 5 |
| Has everyone kept up with the 1st project of the new season?? I
thought 60K to frame the addition was a bit much...this didn't include
materials either. Have to hand it to the owners though they seem
to be putting in a HUGE amount of work (i.e. digging the hole for
the cellar bulkhead, taking down walls, etc.)
|
4.242 | big bucks again this year | NSSG::ALFORD | another fine mess.... | Fri Nov 11 1988 15:01 | 5 |
|
yes, I've been watching...so far so good....hope it stays that way!
21k for the foundation!!! hope those homeowners planned to spend
all this money! Lotta work!
|
4.243 | What's is supposed to cost | RLAV::BAKALETZ | Mike Bakaletz NJCD-SWS 323.4079 | Fri Nov 11 1988 16:51 | 3 |
| I missed the first couple of episodes. Did they say how much they
planned to spend for the whole thing? My feeling is that whatever
work the homeowners do is just a drop in the bucket.
|
4.244 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Nov 11 1988 18:14 | 9 |
| They seem to be keeping things under control a little better this time
around. Last night Bob was talking to Rich Trethewey (?), the
heating "expert", and Bob was wanting to tear out the old boiler
and radiators. Trethewey said they were working fine, so why
not leave 'em there.
I don't understand though, why they bought that precast bulkhead
deal instead of just pouring another jog in the foundation.
(Answer: they probably got it for free?)
|
4.245 | | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Fri Nov 11 1988 20:33 | 13 |
|
I've been working so hard on my money pit (and other things) that
I haven't been getting enough sleep, but last night I took a break
from all the work and watched a fascinating documentary on Nova
about an Indian tribe in the Amazon.
Late in the documentary they were showing how the Indians built
their thatched huts. It seemed to me they were using awfully modern
construction methods. Then I realized that I was watching Bob Villa
(I guess I dozed off) :^).
-tm
|
4.246 | This Old Popular Science | FSHQA2::HUNT | | Mon Nov 14 1988 15:47 | 7 |
|
In this month's Popular Science, there is an article on the house
that they did in Santa Barbara (craftsman style).
Take a look.
Kevin
|
4.247 | This Old <what?> | HPSTEK::EKOKERNAK | | Mon Nov 14 1988 18:22 | 7 |
| I was watching "A Current Affair" a couple of weeks ago and had
the suprise of catching a piece entitled "This Old Whorehouse".
It was a spoof of Bob and Norm, though nothing direct was mentioned.
It was cute, and different.
Elaine
|
4.248 | First time "A Current Affair" was really Funny.. | WFOOFF::KOEHLER | If it's broke....Burn it!! | Tue Nov 15 1988 10:02 | 7 |
| re.180
Elaine, the spoof on This Old Whorehouse was "great"! I was wondering
if anyone else saw it. I thought the two that played Bob and Norm
were great. The bathroom would make the real Bob and Norm turn over
in their graves...
Jim
|
4.249 | | HPSMEG::LUKOWSKI | Nat'l apathy week & nobody cares! | Tue Nov 15 1988 15:34 | 4 |
| I saw it too and it was EXCELLENT! That was one of the few times I
watched 'A Current Affair'. I only wish I could have taped it!
-Jim
|
4.250 | need the name of a material used on TOH | LEVERS::S_JACOBS | Live Free and Prosper | Tue Feb 07 1989 16:18 | 9 |
| People where my wife works were telling her that this past weekend
_TOH_ talked about putting carpet down over concrete in the basement.
They used a special material under the carpet as a water barrier
and insulation, and the material was only about 1/2 inch or 3/4
inch thick. Did anybody catch the name of that material ?????
Thanks
Steve
|
4.251 | Don't think they ever said | KACIE::HENKEL | | Tue Feb 07 1989 19:56 | 8 |
| I don't think they ever stated a brand name. Also, I don't believe
it was being used as a water barrier -- just as insulation and a
cushion for the carpet (they didn't make it clear whether an actual
carpet pad would be used on top of this material.
Sorry I can't be of more help
TH
|
4.252 | | PICV01::CANELLA | | Wed Feb 08 1989 15:21 | 6 |
| Re NOte .183
You can call WGBH and ask for the producer of the TOH program and
someone there will give you the info.
Alfonso
|
4.253 | This Old Pile of Rubble? | CIMNET::MIKELIS | Just browsing through time... | Wed Feb 08 1989 16:04 | 6 |
| Has anyone heard that the three hundred zillion dollar addition to the
B&B in Lexington is now just an expensive pile of ash? I was speaking
to someone from Waltham the other day and he said that it had burned
down, recently. Can anyone confirm or deny this?
-jim-
|
4.254 | I hope they finished... | HPSCAD::KNEWTON | There's no place like home... | Wed Feb 08 1989 18:43 | 7 |
| One of the last two shows mentioned the date it was being filmed. They
said it was Dec. 6. Is there still 8 weeks left in the show? If
it burned down, I wonder if they finished in time.
I'll have to ask my uncle. He's on the Waltham Fire Dept..
Kathy
|
4.255 | It's still there! | LEVERS::CARRAFIELLO | | Fri Feb 10 1989 16:11 | 4 |
| I drove by the building last Sunday (2/5) and it definitely hadn't
burned down. The original front part of the building is still painted
green but the rest of the place looks pretty good. The building
just about fills up the entire lot.
|
4.256 | Where is it ? I'd like to drive by ... | AKOV68::LAVIN | | Mon Feb 13 1989 15:28 | 1 |
|
|
4.257 | furnace by Rheem? | DELNI::GOLDSTEIN | Room 101, Ministry of Love | Wed Feb 15 1989 19:14 | 10 |
| I'm also curious about the whereabouts...
But I also missed hearing where that "energy-efficient" house was
located. What a collection of cheap tricks! Tin siding right
over foam insulation? Using a HOT WATER HEATER as the house
heater? Building air ducts out of floor joists? Squirting foam
everywhere to make up for loose-fitting woodwork?
I don't know if Bob Vila really liked it or just thought it was
interesting to see how many corners could be cut.
|
4.258 | | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Which way to Tahiti? | Wed Feb 15 1989 19:33 | 4 |
|
RE: .190
I think you want note 3010 for specific discussion of this topic.
|
4.259 | new and improved! | VLNVAX::HEDERSTEDT | T.B.S. | Thu Feb 16 1989 21:55 | 6 |
|
I am heating my house with hot water heater coupled with a heat
exchanger. Well,I will be soon and it it is still being built.
Wayne
|
4.260 | Back to the .0 topic "expensive" | AKOV88::LAVIN | | Fri Feb 17 1989 16:16 | 10 |
| The latest in the saga of "that old farmhouse" appeared in the Boston
Globe today. They recapped the numbers that have floated around in this
note - original cost=250k, renovation=440k, owners portion of
renovation=200k. The owners can't afford the mortgage (now 325k) and
will be selling the house.
The house will list for 700k. Can't say I feel particularly sorry
for them since they stand to make a profit of (700-450) 250K !
Not a bad little sum as compensation for putting up with Bob
and Norm for a few months...
|
4.261 | It Was HOMOSOTE On The Concrete Floor | BUTTON::BROWN | | Mon Feb 27 1989 16:37 | 8 |
| Re: .183
The material they put over the concrete is HOMOSOTE, according to
Coldwell's, Berlin, MA. It is a wood fiber product. Their price
for a 8'x4'x1/2" sheet is $15.xx, which puts in the same range as
plywood. It looks like what we will be using some time this spring.
Gary
|
4.262 | Its near the fire station. | LEVERS::CARRAFIELLO | | Mon Feb 27 1989 19:53 | 13 |
| Re; .189
The bed and breakfast is at the corner of Plainfield and Tower streets
in Lexington, Mass. I found it by taking Route 2A through Lexington
from Acton. Once you go past the business area of Lexington you
will pass a history museum on the left. Shortly after that there
is a fire station on the right side. Turn right at the fire station
and the house is a short distance up the road. The house is located
on a small lot that is bounded by roads on three sides. Once you
drive around the house the road comes back out to Route 2A.
I don't know the Lexington area very well so maybe a resident can
enter some better directions.
|
4.263 | This Old Billboard | KACIE::HENKEL | | Wed Mar 01 1989 16:50 | 5 |
| re .195
It's kind of hard to miss these days. It looks like a billboard! From
whichever angle you approach you'll see a sign for something -- the
bank, the constructon company, the landscaper, you name it.
|
4.264 | No more Bob!? | HAVOC::GILLIGAN | Set mertilizer to deep fat fry | Thu Mar 30 1989 12:31 | 3 |
| I heard this morning that Bob has been fired! It seems PBS didn't
like him appearing in so many commercials (it conflicts with
fundraising). There will be a new host next year.
|
4.265 | It's true, Bob is History | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Thu Mar 30 1989 13:46 | 19 |
| I have a photocopy on my desk, from the Boston Herald, this morning:
WGBH-TV is looking for a new host for "This Old House," the station announced
yesterday.
Bob Vila, who has offered viewers tips and advice on home renovation,
modernization and maintenance will leave the show after 10 years.
WGBH station manager David Liroff said yesterday the station is concerned about
the show's independence in light of Vila's many product endorsements.
"With our acquiescence over the last several years, Bob entered into a number
of commercial relationships in which he appeared as spokesperson for a variety
of products. It is now apparent that the continuation of these comercial
activities would be in conflict with the perceived editorial independence of
the series and its ability to sustain national and local funding," Liroff said.
The first episode featuring the new host, who has yet to be named, will enter
production in June and premiere in October.
|
4.266 | What perceived editorial independence ? | NEBR::HARRISON | Knee High By The 4th of July | Thu Mar 30 1989 14:02 | 12 |
|
re .198
I haven't held this notion in years (Grossman's, BROSCO, Marvin, etc.)
Anyway, I watch Bob for entertainment value now, not pratical advise !
-Bob
|
4.267 | maybe it'll be Norm ... | AKOV88::LAVIN | Oh, It's a profit deal | Thu Mar 30 1989 14:36 | 1 |
|
|
4.268 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Thu Mar 30 1989 15:36 | 10 |
| > < Note 1974.200 by AKOV88::LAVIN "Oh, It's a profit deal" >
> -< maybe it'll be Norm ... >-
But Norm's got his own show now, "The New Yankee Workshop."
I've been suspecting that Norm was being phased out in favor of the new
guy who has been doing a lot of general carpentry and installations.
His name is Tom(?) something?
He's a "general contractor," not a "master carpenter" like Norm is.
- tom]
|
4.269 | "editorial independence"?? | CADSE::ENGELHARDT | | Thu Mar 30 1989 16:09 | 9 |
| RE .198: "...would be in conflict with the perceived editorial independence of
the series..."
What a JOKE, what a fraud!! Since TOH is one long commercial itself, the
conflict is between what Bob endorses on TOH and what he endorses
independently.
I guess that it's finally time for a letter to 'GBH about their illusion of
"perceived editorial independence".
|
4.270 | WGBH Strategy? | KACIE::HENKEL | | Fri Mar 31 1989 15:16 | 22 |
| Do you think WGBH gave Norm his own show so he could gain the experience
to take over TOH? There's more to being the host of a show like TOH
than just explaining how and why things are being done. Norm certainly
does a good job of explaining/demonstrating things, but perhaps GBH
didn't feel he was ready to take over the whole show.
Surely the dissatisfaction with Bob Vila didn't
happen overnight. If this note is any indication of Bob's
demographics, no one actually likes him! I'll bet his moonlight
huckstering of commercial products is more the excuse, not the reason for
dumping him.
Given TOH is one of GBH's better shows (one that is picked up by most
PBS affiliates) GBH may not have been willing to risk handing the show
over to Norm until they were sure he could handle it. From what I've
seen of Yankee Workshop he can handle it.
I'll bet it would be much easier for GBH to find another person who
can build furniture to host Yankee Workshop (a relatively unknown show)
and move Norm into the TOH slot.
|
4.271 | | MYVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Fri Mar 31 1989 20:08 | 8 |
|
I think the perpose of having someone like Bob to host TOH is that
he relates more to the average do-it-yourselfer then Norm does.
Bob comes off as someone who knows a little, and is willing to try
anything. I someone like Norm will give the attitude that this project
should only be done by professionals.
Mike
|
4.272 | "Say goodbye," Bob | FREDW::MATTHES | half a bubble off plumb | Sun Apr 02 1989 09:55 | 51 |
| "Old House" host shown the door
By Robert W. Trott
The Associated Press
[Nashua Telegraph, Friday 3-31, reprinted without permission]
BOSTON - Bob Villa, host of one of public television's most popular shows, won't
be calling "This Old House" home anymore, says the program's executive producer.
The veteran host is being shown the door because his numerous commercial
endorsements don't fit the image of public television, officials at public
television station WGBH in Boston said Thursday.
"Our assessment was that he was locked into contracts that wouldn't allow him to
step back from those commitments," said WGBH spokesman Christopher Ridley.
"It's really not a suprise for either side."
WGBH officials downplayed the parting, saying it was an amicable end to nine
months of negotiations with the do-it-yourself home show host.
But Villa's agent, Ron Feiner, said the move had come as a suprise.
"Bob first knew about it when he read a copy of the press release," Feiner said
from his New York office. "Sure he's upset about it. All his commercial
activities were approved in advance by WGBH. We were suprised they used that as
a reason not to renew him."
Producers had asked Villa about the possibility of ending his commercial
contracts, but the veteran TV personality declined to cooperate, Ridley said.
Villa has appeared in advertising as a spokesman for a number of commercial
enterprises, including Time-Life home repair books; American Electric Power, a
heat pump manufacturer; Amerock Corp., a cabinet and storage hardware
manufacturer; Boyle-Midway Household Products Inc., makers of Easy Off oven
cleaner and 3-In-One oil; Newell Co., makers of window furnishings; and Rickel
Home Centers in the Mid-Atlantic region.
"The decision has been ongoing in the past couple of weeks," WGBH spokeswoman
Daphne Noyes said. "We'd been negotiating with him throughout the season. It
became apparent to us that these commercial activities were interfering with the
appearance of public television."
Ridley said he did not expect the popular host's departure would hurt the show,
which is shown nationwide on 298 public television stations. A veiwer survey
indicated the program, including reruns, drew 22 milion viewers one week in
1988, Noyes said.
"We've believed since the start "This Old House" is a concept, and it's not
dependent on any one individual," the spokesman said.
"This isn't a slap at Bob, but it's a wiewer participation show. We think that
we can find someone else who will carry on in his tradition."
|
4.22 | | DASXPS::TIMMONS | | Mon Apr 03 1989 10:19 | 11 |
| Well, Bob Vila is gone! Fired from TOH, apparently because of his
involvement with commercial enterprises which take advantage of
his PBS work. The Time/Life commercials come to mind.
I understand that they are having tryouts for his replacement.
Prime requirements are 1) some experience as a contractor, and,
2) 5 years experience as a drummer in a professional band. Gotta
get those touches and slaps in every shot, you know.
Lee
|
4.273 | TOH vs Hometime | CADSE::SIMONICH | | Mon Apr 03 1989 12:48 | 10 |
|
For the last couple of seasons TOH has been showing more of
whats new in building materials rather than how to fix something.
I think Hometime does a much better job of showing the
homeowner how to actually do projects yourself.
Dave
|
4.274 | more dirt | AKOV75::LAVIN | Oh, It's a profit deal | Mon Apr 03 1989 13:10 | 13 |
| re .205
The Boston Globe carried a similar article last week, but they included
a little more of the "interesting facts".
One of the products Bob was endorsing was produced by a company that is
a subsidiary of another company that is a direct competitor with
Weyerhauser (TOH primary sponser). WGBH approved this endorsment.
However, when Weyerhauser said they were pulling out of TOH because of
Bob's actions, WGBH threw him to the dogs.
BTW - the dogs in this case are providing Bob with 500K annually in
compensation for his various endorsements.
|
4.275 | 1 M$/yr at stake | LDYBUG::MCGOLDRICK | | Mon Apr 03 1989 16:43 | 2 |
| And I believe that Weyerhauser supplies 'GBH with $1M/year for
their TOH advertisement on 'commercial-fee' television.
|
4.276 | we could hear more of him elsewhere | DELNI::GOLDSTEIN | Room 101, Ministry of Love | Mon Apr 03 1989 20:26 | 6 |
| Gee, I wonder if Bob will pull a Siskel&Ebert, and sign up with
a syndicator to do a commercial show. "At Home with Bob Vila" or
something.
Given the drivel on syndicated (and network!) TV, it's not impossible.
|
4.277 | | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Which way to Tahiti? | Mon Apr 03 1989 21:02 | 6 |
|
I think this note should be write-locked in memory of our
soon-to-be-lost Bob. It just won't be the same without him touching,
poking and feeling everything in sight. We won't hear his quiet
whispers of "donated, donated" anymore. We won't have ol' Bob to
kick around anymore. sniff...sniff...8;^(
|
4.278 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Tue Apr 04 1989 12:12 | 17 |
| Bob got the job on the original This Old House based on his experience
as a rehabilitator. The first house was the old Victorian in Dorchester
that WGBH sold as part of their annual auction.
Through the years, the rehab aspects of the show have kept trying to come
to the fore, though often the aspects of new construction dominate.
No, Norm is not the type to host this show. He is the skilled craftsman,
the one to execute what needs to be done, not the one to plan and decide on
what is to be done (the old manager vs. technical worker problem).
Bob will be back, perhaps syndicated on commercial TV, Siskel&Ebert-like,
but TOH will continue, probably with a host much like Bob.
TOH one long commercial? Maybe so, but there are surprisingly few brand
names or outright product descriptions given. I find that a bit
surprising, actually.
- tom]
|
4.279 | Lets kick WGBH around, too. | POOL::LANDMAN | VMS - Not just for minis anymore | Tue Apr 04 1989 12:13 | 8 |
| According to the article, WGBH pre-approved all of Bob's outside
contracts, per his contract with him. Then when pressure was put on
WGBH, they insisted that Bob break the contracts. When Bob asked WGBH
to indemnify him against any damages from breaking the contracts, WGBH
refused.
Bob may not be the greatest do-it-yourselfer, but the shame in this
case falls upon WGBH.
|
4.280 | | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Which way to Tahiti? | Tue Apr 04 1989 13:07 | 5 |
|
And you'd think that WGBH would have sponsors begging them to take
Weyerhauser's place if they pulled out. I agree that Bob appears
to be in the right. I wonder if a lawsuit will come out of this?
|
4.281 | Poor old Bob | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Tue Apr 04 1989 20:25 | 20 |
| If WGBH simply failed to renew his contract, he'd have no grounds to sue.
They may have approved all of his endorsements, but I can't believe that
they were happy about his using This Old House to pull in $500K/year in
endorsements. If it weren't for TOH, Bob couldn't have endorsed anything.
Personally, I got tired long ago of the techno-junk that Bob seemed to
love to stuff into every house. Trash compactors, projection TV's --
no matter how rich I were to get, I wouldn't want them in *my* house.
I'd spend my money on nicer windows, better materials, and larger spaces.
Anyway, Bob has been milking this thing for all it's worth -- which is ok,
but I don't see that he has anything that another host wouldn't. (Unlike
Siskel&Ebert, who are an improvement on all of their replacements). But
yes, I expect Bob to appear on cable in the fall. With any luck, TOH
can go back to being a practical renovations show. The way the economy
is going, lots more people are going to renovate instead of moving or
building new, so it is even topical again.
Enjoy,
Larry
|
4.282 | | MYVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Tue Apr 04 1989 20:49 | 9 |
|
Just because Bob is leaving, don't expect the format to change.
I doubt that Bob has much-if any- to do with the show's format.
The more the show relies on their supporters line Warehouser, the
more those companies are going to infulence the show.
Mike
|
4.283 | Don't Blame Bob! | CHART::CBUSKY | | Tue Apr 04 1989 21:04 | 17 |
| > Personally, I got tired long ago of the techno-junk that Bob seemed to
> love to stuff into every house. Trash compactors, projection TV's --
Don't blame Bob for all this or expect to see it change just because
he's gone. Bob Villa is basically just an "ACTOR" hired by WGBH to
"ACT" as the host of This Old House. Bob's the actor who follows the
directions of the director who listens to the producer who all work
for WGBH.
Bob may have a hand in soliciting sponsor's for the show BUT
ultimately it's WGBH that's accepting Wyerhouser's and other
contributors money and mentioning their names and showcasing their
products. This won't change because Bob is leaving, IN FACT, WGBH is
letting Bob go so that they can CONTINUE to receive money from some of
these sponsors!
Charly
|
4.284 | | MAMIE::THOMS | Ross - 264-6457 | Wed Apr 05 1989 11:48 | 7 |
| I like TOH being used as a showcase for new products. Some of the "new"
products they've shown over the past 10 years have become or are becoming
standard construction pieces. (Laminate beams, boiler mate, etc., to name
a few). On the other hand, some of the new products were just fads or bad
ideas, but it's still useful seeing them all.
Ross
|
4.285 | Ya never know... | ATSE::GOODWIN | | Wed Apr 05 1989 18:51 | 9 |
| Check out the latest Popular Mechanics. They make it clear that Bob
Vila is their source of renovating expertise and always has been,
and even managed to find a little left over time to do TOH on WGBH.
They have a special spread in the magazine that starts off with a color
picture of George Bush and some quotes, then pictures and articles by
several other well known personalities, one of whom is Bob Vila.
The whole thing sure gives you a different perspective on Bob Vila than
WGBH does.
|
4.23 | Who will we pick on??? | ELWOOD::OBRIEN | | Fri Apr 07 1989 20:42 | 9 |
|
Well, as Richard Nixon once said.
"You won't have Bob Vila to kick around anymore"
Thank's for the memories Bob!!!
Mike
|
4.286 | Should be good for a laugh | HAVOC::GILLIGAN | I fused at room temperature! | Tue May 16 1989 13:48 | 1 |
| Norm is on Letterman tonight
|
4.287 | Norms letterman debut and "Do you remember?" | CSC32::S_LEDOUX | Specialization is for insects. | Wed May 17 1989 16:04 | 14 |
|
So, did anybody watch norm ? I fell asleep.
On another note, sometime around mid-march I saw bob and norm
laying this very thin hardwood floor in somebody's kitchen.
All I can remember about the stuff is that they layed down a
rubber padding and then put down the boards. They kinda tounge
& grooved themselves together and required nothing but a solid
smack to hold them tight - no nailing - no advesives - nada.
Does anybody know or remember what this stuff was ?
Thanks.
Scott.
|
4.288 | Bruce Floors | DODO::MARTIN | 234-4887 Northboro | Mon May 22 1989 14:44 | 10 |
| I believe what you describe is the Bruce patented floating floor. I am pretty sure
its the Bruce brand, of not its one of the other leading names. I went to a seminar
on this stuff a couple of years ago. Goes on real easy and amazingly does a
superb job. No nailing or anything. If I could ever aford hardwood floors I thing
this is what I would do. The seminar was through Moores lumber in Leominster.
I've also seen it at Somerville Lumber and other leading building supply houses.
good luck
ken
|
4.289 | Norm refuses TOH host role | KYOA::BOLLE | | Thu Jun 08 1989 18:15 | 6 |
| I'm new to the notes file. I have enjoyed all the comments on TOH.
I remember hearing somewhere that when Norm was asked if he would
host the show his reply was " after all the years he spent answering
the questions Bob asked, he didn't think it was a good idea to assume
the role of asking the questions he knew the answers too." Good point
wouldn't you say?
|
4.24 | and the new Bob Vila is ...... | FRAGLE::STUART | tee many martoonies | Thu Jul 27 1989 15:25 | 10 |
|
PBS has replaced Bob Vila with Stephen Thomas. He is a craftsman
and a sailor and some other notable talent I don't recall.
He will join the show for their 11th season.
I'm getting tired of watching repeats !!
ace
|
4.25 | But you can pick your lunch off the trees! | ISLNDS::BELKIN | 6/*/74! | Fri Sep 08 1989 19:30 | 14 |
|
re -.1, yeah, but repeats like the ones just started -
on the infamous California "craftsman-style" bungalo, are worth
watching for their comic relief!!!
Last night was the first one, with Norm delivering the famous line,
in response to Bob asking him "how's that foundation Norm?",
"I think we should take the next flight to Boston, Bob" !!
Seems the concrete was made with beach sand.....
Wasn't there another TOH note? I've looked in 1111.*
Josh
|
4.26 | Only 222 replies! | WJO::MARCHETTI | Mama said there'd be days like this. | Fri Sep 08 1989 19:45 | 5 |
| re. -1
Yep, see note 1974.
Bob
|
4.290 | | SALEM::RIEU | We're Taxachusetts...AGAIN! | Tue Sep 26 1989 16:26 | 3 |
| The new host of TOH will make an appearance on Evening Magazine tonight
on Ch 4 (Boston).
Denny
|
4.291 | New season.. New replies | RLAV::BAKALETZ | Mike Bakaletz NJCD-SWS 323.4079 | Fri Oct 20 1989 16:11 | 9 |
| Come on. We're already 2 programs into the new series and nobody has
any comments. I couldn't wait til the new season started so I read
what you folks had to say out there. Don't let me down.
mb
P.S. I heard that someone saw Bob Vila living out of a cardboard box
in a Rickels garden center somewhere. This notesfile won't be the same
without him.
|
4.292 | Ed McMahon maybe, but not Bob Vila! | TEKTRM::REITH | Jim Reith DTN 235-8459 HANNAH::REITH | Fri Oct 20 1989 17:04 | 2 |
| I heard Bob was living out of a car and traveling to peoples houses that
subscribed to the Time/Life DIY series ;^)
|
4.293 | Micheal from Newhart | WMOIS::T_NELSON | On a Beer day you can Pee forever | Fri Oct 20 1989 18:13 | 6 |
| The new guy's a DORK!!! Reminds me of Micheal from the
Newhart Show. When it comes to houses he seems about as smart
too... :') :') Maybe they'll do an episode with George Utley (sp?)
and fix the Stradford Inn.
TN
|
4.294 | | ALLVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Fri Oct 20 1989 19:22 | 6 |
|
re .226
My impression exactly. However the guy does have some good cradentials.
Seems he's restore a few old homes himself.
MIKE
|
4.295 | from bad to worse | DEMING::TADRY | | Fri Oct 20 1989 19:22 | 6 |
| Yea I think Popeye, because he such a sailor, is a bit of a mismatch
for the show, I think thats why they have Norm nursing him. They'd be
better off with Norm, he seems to be the brains of the operation now.
It still amazes me that the continue to show all these way-out projects
that are mega-bucks. $200,000.00, sure. I bet this'll come in at
$225,000.00 or better.
|
4.296 | | WEFXEM::COTE | No, Kelly. I said *wits*... | Fri Oct 20 1989 19:48 | 20 |
| I got the distinct impression Norm would rather stick needles in his
eyes than do this project...
(paraphrased)
New Guy: " Ah, doncha just love that earthy, honest smell in an old
barn?"
Norm: " ...damp..."
New Guy: "Look at what character this fieldstone foundation has!"
"...leaks..."
New Guy: "These timbres tell the entire history of the barn!"
Norm: "...lotsa repairs..."
Edd
|
4.297 | Step by step, inch by inch... | SONATA::HICKOX | Stow Vice | Sun Oct 22 1989 15:04 | 19 |
|
Remember way back when Bob V. started and how dorky he
acted on TV because: a) he was nervous; b) he didn't know how
to act for TV; c) he was a dork; or d) all of the above?
I would say give the guy a few shows to get the hang of
things and see how he does. Don't we all have a learning
curve when we start a new job, BTW: maybe he didn't choose
to do this project and maybe Norm didn't either, remember
there are other people running things in the background.
Let's just be glad that GBH woke up and Vila is history,
I'd rather watch a dork that knows something, than a jerk that
doesn't.
Mark
|
4.298 | A real barn raising | BAGELS::RIOPELLE | | Mon Oct 23 1989 04:28 | 7 |
|
I wonder why they didn't give norm the host slot, and give Silva
norms spot, I thought the barn story was real corny right up to
the old station wagon being cleared away at the end. I wonder how
many people will be looking for barns to remodel after this series.
I hope they present some unique ideas we all can apply to our homes.
|
4.299 | | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | | Mon Oct 23 1989 10:49 | 6 |
| I read somewhere (probably this note) that Norm didn't want
the host spot because it wouldn't look right if all of a sudden he
had to start asking the dumb "Gee Norm, why do you do that?" questions
when he's the one that's been answering them for so long.
George
|
4.300 | not the real cost | WMOIS::L_WATERMAN | | Mon Oct 23 1989 17:47 | 9 |
|
I also read somewhere about the costs of this renovation. The
people who are doing the barn are putting in about 250K, and will
be getting about 150K worth of "freebies". But at the end of the
series they won't tell us about the free stuff. Very misleading
if you think you can do all of the same things for the 250K.
I don't miss Bob, but I sure don't like this new guy either.
Linda
|
4.301 | Barn razing | NAC::GODDARD | | Mon Oct 23 1989 18:12 | 8 |
| I kind of like the new guy. I think he'll get the hang of things pretty
quickly. Look how many years it took for Bob to be comforatable in
front of the camera. Anyway it should help too that Bob's not a hard
act to follow.
I think they should, however, rename the show to a more appropriate
name....something to do with new construction. Other than than tearing
down an old barn it has nothing to do with an 'old house'.
|
4.302 | | ALLVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Mon Oct 23 1989 19:20 | 9 |
|
re .233
Many of the shows they've shown the breakdown of how much was donated
and how much the owner had to come up with. I remember one show
Bob went right through a list and showed exactly what was donated
and how much it cost.
Mike
|
4.303 | Where is the barn? | MAY11::WARCHOL | | Tue Oct 24 1989 16:32 | 6 |
| Has anyone found the location of the old barn in Concord, MA yet? A
few of us were going to take a ride over at lunch to see what they are
doing. I have a vague idea where it is but if anyone has a street name
that would be a big help.
Nick
|
4.304 | 299 Strawberry Hill Road, Concord MA | CAROL::FRAMPTON | Carol Frampton | Tue Oct 24 1989 16:40 | 11 |
| re .236
Accroding to the Concord telephone book the Wickwire's live at
299 Strawberry Hill Road, Concord.
Strawberry Hill Rd is off of Route 2A in Acton. Chez Claude is on the
corner. It is roughly opposite the Gould's Plaza with Triple A Market.
I'm not sure how far down it is - probably a couple of miles.
Carol
|
4.305 | | ALLVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Tue Oct 24 1989 18:23 | 8 |
|
re .236
The barn is probably already complete. The episodes are shown weeks
after they were taped. If it's not done yet, I'll bet it's real
close.
Mike
|
4.306 | a vote for Bob | CIMNET::MIKELIS | Just browsing through time... | Tue Oct 24 1989 19:12 | 26 |
| RE: last several...
I may be one of the few TOH viewers that happened to have
liked Bob Vila as host.
I cannot understand the continuous put downs of the guy by so many
of the people in this conference who feel that they could do better.
Have any of you ever appeared on camera? Do you know how difficult
it is to play host?
I have been watching the show for many years and must concede that Bob
was very good at doing just what he was supposed to do - keep the show
moving and ask pertinent (albeit, sometimes obvious to some people) questions
that our not-so-informed viewers at home (myself included) can perhaps
learn something from. Of course, most people in this conference already
know all the answers, right? :-)
I will miss BoB and i do believe that will be a hard act to follow and it
is a difficult position for any new host to fill. I personally don't
particulary care for Steve. I feel that the show is too scripted, now.
In any case, i will continue to watch it and will give the new host some
time to get his feet wet - being a sailor and all...
No flames, please...
-jim
|
4.307 | PBS GOOF'd with this one | MADMXX::GROVER | | Tue Oct 24 1989 20:26 | 22 |
| I agree with .239.... I guess I was just waiting for someone else
to say it first, BUT I liked Bob Vila also. I didn't know the show
when he was "new", but I did like the show and the way he presented
himself and the projects.
I personally believe the main reason he is no longer on is due to
the fact that PBS got bent out of shape because Bob Vila became
involved in other interests related to the format of the show but
PBS was not included in the royalties. So they booted him..!
I feel PBS made a GREAT BIG mistake in that area. The fact that
Bob Vila was becoming famous enough for beoming involved in such
things like "time/life books" should be a boost to the efforts of
the PBS network. It should show PBS how much the viewers actually
watch such programs. The more exposure, the more viewers, the more
donations (to keep the shows on PBS) when it comes time for their
fund raising.
I THINK THEY PLAIN GOOF'D....
My $.02 on TOH..! I will continue to watch though..!
|
4.308 | Another 'out of the closet' viewer. | SALEM::RIEU | We're Taxachusetts...AGAIN! | Wed Oct 25 1989 12:36 | 4 |
| Me too, I liked Bob! There was sometimes a lot of 'hype' on the
show, but that was in lieu of commercials. They had to pay back
for all their free stuff somehow.
Denny
|
4.309 | not complete yet | KACIE::HENKEL | | Wed Oct 25 1989 13:29 | 18 |
| Re. several back
No it's not finished. The frame is up, plywood siding is on and the
doors and windows have been installed. It looks as if it's basically a
shell at this point -- i.e., it doesn't appear that much interior work
has been done. They probably wanted to get the shell up before the
weather turns.
Frankly, I think the homeowners would have been better off spending
$200K to rehab the old farmhouse and improve the view by leveling the
barn. The barn is awfully close (at least by comparison to the
surrounding properites) to the farmhouse, and it's right on the street.
If you drive past, you can clearly see that not much of the original
structure actually remains -- once you put in a new foundation, new
walls and new roof, doesn't that basically add up to a new house?
TH
|
4.310 | | MAMIE::THOMS | Ross @285-3151 | Wed Oct 25 1989 13:53 | 9 |
| RE:-1 I believe the homeowners have the 250k to spend on the barn from the
proceeds in selling the farm house.
Bob Vila = Arrogant S.O.B. < that's why I and (many people I know) don't like
him!
Ross
|
4.311 | | CIMNET::MIKELIS | Just browsing through time... | Wed Oct 25 1989 15:29 | 31 |
| >Bob Vila = Arrogant S.O.B. < that's why I and (many people I know) don't like
> him!
True, but honest and unpretentious. And that's why i LIKE him.
RE: barn and Wickwire's
One thing i can't understand is that the owner's had already sold
their house BEFORE even having the barn inspected for live-abilty -
at least that's the impression i got. Doesn't sound very wise.
Also, since the barn is an apparent historical landmark, how can Concord
approve of them tearing 99.9% of it down and rebuilding a modern look-alike
using only SOME of the original beams?
I think the owner's are Crazy with a capital "C". Notice how Mr.
Wickwire (interesting name) kept reemphasizing that he "had to keep
to his budget of $250K"? It appears that TOH might of got into
a little trouble with going way over budget on the old farm house
restoration in Westwood (think that's were it was).
Personally, i would of lived in the Victorian and kept the 150 year
old barn as is. Mrs. Wickwire is obsessed with the notion of living
in that barn, though. This one has got to be high on TOH's most
ridiculous projects ever undertaken. It was pretty funny listening to
Norm on the 1st show when him and Steve went around inspecting the
old barn. Norm must think they're nuts, too!
How did you like that modest 'barn' in Nantucket they toured last week?
-jim
|
4.312 | TOB This old Barn | BAGELS::RIOPELLE | | Wed Oct 25 1989 15:50 | 18 |
|
Re .244 Yea I saw that episode last night. Just by them taking it
down and putting it back up leads me to beleive that the town should
have condemed it in the first place. I was really impressed by the
conservations comm, and the contractor that removed the tank and
oh ya heres comes the fire dept to check things out. Everyone take
your places please, roll-em. I wasn't impressed by the barn tours.
But the MRS. like the wide boards in the first barn. I can't wait
to see what this architect has to say, mega money. All in all I've
lost intrest in this program its become too scripted as mentioned
earlier, norm seems to be roll acting, he doen't look natural like
he does on his own show. Shows like HomeTime and a few others that
are on cable seem to be where TOH started way back good down to
earth info on how to get things around the house done. I wouldn't
be suprised to see a new show pop up and blow TOH out of the water.
Just My .02
|
4.313 | "This Old House" -- *What* old house? | BCSE::YANKES | | Wed Oct 25 1989 16:01 | 15 |
|
I have nothing major pro or con concerning the change of hosts, but
my problem with the current project is simply this:
What does this have to do with repairs around my house?
Personally, I'm not into ripping my house down to the foundation
and starting all over -- especially if the goal is to make it look the
same as it was before I started. I'd rather see a lot more of the
"here is a real world problem in a 40 year old bathroom -- how do we
fix it?" rather than how to build a new house to showcase things that
are way too expensive for mere mortals like myself to afford. Even the
show's title of "This Old House" has no relation to the project!
-craig
|
4.314 | Evolution of TOH | RLAV::BAKALETZ | Mike Bakaletz NJCD-SWS 323.4079 | Wed Oct 25 1989 16:25 | 10 |
| I think if you go back and review the history of TOH you'll see (for
better or worse, I'm not sure which) an evolution from DYI series to
something on the order of "Better Homes and Gardens Remodelling Tips"
series. There is nothing much left in the way of DYI on TOH. If
you're looking for DYI better stick with HomeTime or some such.
I still think TOH is interesting though, especially this one. The
Wickwires are real birds.
MB
|
4.315 | When?? | CNTROL::KING | | Wed Oct 25 1989 16:48 | 1 |
| When is Hometime on and on what channel???
|
4.316 | Hometime - this is "when?" | REGENT::MOZER | H.C.C. ;-) | Wed Oct 25 1989 17:14 | 16 |
|
RE: "When is Hometime on and on what channel??"
Day Time Ch.
Sun. 10:00 44
Sun. 12:00 11
Sun. 3:00p 44
Mon. 11:30p 11
Thurs. 7:30p 2
Fri. 3:00p 2
Sat. 2:00p 2
|
4.317 | Are we keeping a tally... | SONATA::HICKOX | Stow Vice | Wed Oct 25 1989 22:51 | 11 |
|
Well, from all the replies I would say it doesn't matter
who the host is, everyone here is watching regardless!
Hometime is a good show, a little corny at times, but helpful.
No comment on the house/barn thing, everyone's got their own
priorities, eccentricities (sp?).
Mark
|
4.318 | We would show you but you can't do it, so we won't | CADSE::MCCARTHY | I have never calculated the odds sir. | Thu Oct 26 1989 08:56 | 20 |
| Just a thought. Maybe they got out of "Here is how to install a new
sink" because, by code, a homeowner (in MA) can not do any plumbing.
Same with wiring and any MAJOR work (most people will not go get the
permits required). If this is the reason, they should show how to
put up paneling, put down a floor, install replacement windows
(hey thats a good one!) but that is what HOMETIME is doing.
The show has turned into a show for contractors.
The only work (Sweat Equity) that the homeowner puts in is cleaning up.
The Barn:
"You need a professional demolation team". I know they wanted to save
some of the board but I think they should have taken it down the
Mel Gibson way, hook it up to the back of a truck and PULL!
I have seen Hometime but would rather watch reruns of TOH from the
first few seasions where they would repair a front porch (and not
even mention the cost).
mac
|
4.319 | Good for apprentice architects,dont try this at home! | CARTUN::VHAMBURGER | Woodcarvers are sharp people! | Thu Oct 26 1989 11:49 | 13 |
|
I think we are all missing the style and content of the first shows
with the reas and usable ideas around how to fix a porch that sags, how to
change a poor interior wall arrangement into a good living space, etc. Now,
it seems the last few years have been near total destruction of an existing
building to give you a modern impression of the original work. The
California bungalow kept the outside lines, but not much else......I never
saw the Westwood job, and aren't killing myself to see this series. I think
they should rename the show to "look what money and an architect can do on
a piece of previously occupied land....."
Vic H
|
4.320 | | BOSOX::TIMMONS | speling and grammer count four tu! | Thu Oct 26 1989 14:17 | 6 |
| Good point, Vic. For my part, I find these new shows somewhat
entertaining and informative, but totally useless for my needs.
So, I watch more for the fun of it, than what I used to tune in
for.
Heck, I don't even own a barn, never mind needing to redo one.
|
4.321 | SUCH A DEAL! | FSHQA2::DWILLIAMS | But words are things | Thu Oct 26 1989 15:31 | 12 |
| WGBH, according to an article in the Boston Globe, let Bob V.
go under pressure from the major TOH advertiser (yeah, the plugs are
adverts because PBS can't air adverts !!!).
The same article stated the new host has an excellent background
in the building trades. It also stated the Concord barn project is
budgetted for $400,000, $250,000 of which will be picked up by
the owners, and WGBH is upset at the $400,000 because it is over
the original budget. (The article also stated that TOH is the most
popular program on public broadcasting in the US.
Douglas
|
4.322 | He's back... | BUILD::MORGAN | | Thu Oct 26 1989 16:37 | 12 |
| According to today's Boston Herald, Bob Vila will return to the
airwaves with a home improvement show sponsored by Sears. He will also
be the exclusive spokesman for all Sears home imporvement marketing
programs, including television, newspaper, magazine and direct-mail
advertising.
The program, tentatively called "Home Again With Bob Vila," will be
offered for syndication by Oglivy & Mather of Chicago. The show will
feature remodeling jobs that "the average consumer can afford to
perform."
Steve
|
4.323 | | ALLVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Thu Oct 26 1989 16:54 | 24 |
|
Couple of comments:
Scripted:
Hometime is much more of a script then TOH. The people who do hometime
are professional actors (or so I heard from cousins who live in
the Philli area).
TOH has been scripted from the beginning. Did you ever wonder how
the camera got into the house before Bob did???? Or how the plumbing
contractor just happens to have the new faucet they were talking
about in his back pocket????
Plumbing and Electric:
They should start doing shows out of state. I first heard of TOH
when I lived in Syracuse NY. Most of the towns surrounding Syracuse,
you don't need a liscenced plumber or electrician to do the work.
I think they are tied into their plumbing contractor, and Weirhouser
for their plumbing fixtures, so they never show the homeower doing
the work.
Mike
|
4.324 | Bob in sports | VISE::LEVESQUE | Never ever enough | Thu Oct 26 1989 18:04 | 7 |
|
Bob Villa actually had a huge article in Sports Illustrated last
week. It spanded at least a half dozen pages, giving all sorts of
house hold tips. Pretty easy reading....
BAL
|
4.325 | Go Get'em Bob.... | BAGELS::RIOPELLE | | Thu Oct 26 1989 18:22 | 7 |
|
Re .255 - Yea, Notice those key words, jobs "that the average
consumer can afford to perform"
TOH is missing the boat for sure, but its still fun to watch someone
blow $400,000 to live in horse quaters.
|
4.326 | Did someone say take it out of Mass? :-) | BCSE::YANKES | | Thu Oct 26 1989 19:10 | 25 |
|
Re: .256 Going out of state.
Yeah, my thoughts exactly after I read the two replies that said:
1) A homeowner can't do these things in Mass, and,
2) TOH is the most popular nationwide show on public television.
Perhaps what they need is to put a disclaimer at the beginning and
ending of the show that says: "It is illegal for an unlicensed
homeowner to do several or all of these repairs in the People's
Republic of Taxachusetts. Please consult with your local building
inspector to determine the necessity of permits and licenses and check
with your state legistlature about changing this silly law -- if Norm
can do these repairs, so can you." ;-)
Actually, if WGBH is willing to shell out multi- hundreds of
thousands of dollars on a project, I'll do my civic duty and volunteer
my Nashua house for an addition. Its out of Taxachusetts so it would
be legal for me to participate in the work (get the show back to its
roots) and is close enough to Boston so that WGBH's travelling budget
wouldn't be impacted. Its the least I can do to support TOH.
-craig
|
4.327 | You can doing wiring, etc in MASS | SLOAN::HOM | | Fri Oct 27 1989 00:32 | 12 |
| Regarding .251
> Just a thought. Maybe they got out of "Here is how to install a new
> sink" because, by code, a homeowner (in MA) can not do any plumbing.
> Same with wiring and any MAJOR work (most people will not go get the
> permits required). If this is the reason, they should show how to
In Acton,MA you can do your own electrical as well as rough
construction. I recently re-did the kitchen and have passed all
inspections. I keep the signed inspection reports to prove it.
|
4.328 | | CADSE::MCCARTHY | I have never calculated the odds sir. | Fri Oct 27 1989 09:01 | 27 |
| RE .260
<<< Note 1974.260 by SLOAN::HOM >>>
-< You can doing wiring, etc in MASS >-
Yes I know that you can pull an electrical permit and light
construction permit in MOST Mass towns. Most people don't
think they can, go ahead and do the work anyway. Sometimes they
do dangerous things (especally dealing with outside outlets).
If the general public knew they could go to the town/city hall
and get advice and inspection from the town inspector I think
alot more people would. I think people fear the "inspector".
I KNOW it would make the insurance company happy!
RE in_general...
I think Bob did a good job. I just think the projects got out of
hand. The Hometime people are actors but that is ok because they
are doing SOME of the work themselves which shows that "yes, you
can do this too". The last few seasons Bob did little more then
jump in front of the camera taking us from contractor to contractor
to homeowner to the plant where they make windows. Moving TOH out of
the state may be the answer to showing more hands on jobs.
Lets see Bob at Sears....will he team up with Cheryl Tiegs and give
tips on how to look good in a mesh bathing suit :-)
brian
|
4.329 | Now you see it, now you don't | DEMING::TADRY | | Fri Oct 27 1989 17:40 | 12 |
| Well if you didn't watch it last night your in for a good laugh
tomorrow night. Rebuild what barn, save what timbers, we've
been sucked in again. I don't blame Bob, Steve, or Norm, but the
producers have to go. They keep losing site, or I have the wrong
idea, of what this show is supposed to be about. They should have
Robin Leach host this show, Home Construction for the Rich and Famous.
In his voice.."Here comes Rich Trethewy with an arm load of gold plated
bathroom fixtures". I think the only salvation with this project is
going to be the timber framer and his techniques, and I think they
knew that.
RT
|
4.330 | TOH....aka "home shopping channel" | CECV01::SELIG | | Fri Oct 27 1989 19:50 | 17 |
| What has me puzzled is they should have had an idea of how rotten
the building was before dismantling........so why spend all the
$ for a framing crew and timber-frame consultant to "DISMANTLE"
what could have gone down with one swing of a crane.
Considering the scant pile of reusables........the dismantling
cost isn't justified.
Judging by the tour of the other converted Concord barn (which
was quite spectacular), I would agree that this job is going
to be another "home show exposition" for the rich and famous.
An interesting contrast to watch Hometime.............followed
by TOH. Hometime is "educational" television.............TOH
is PBS' version of "Home Shopping Channel".
Jonathan
|
4.331 | site inspection... | ENGINE::PAULHUS | Chris @ MLO6B-2/T13 dtn 223-6871 | Mon Oct 30 1989 13:01 | 9 |
| My bike ride yesterday afternoon took me up Strawberry Hill Road. At
the TOH site, there were cars stopped on both sides of the road, many
people out of the cars taking photos. The place looks SO different in
person, as compared to the stuff you see on TV! The Barn is quite close
to the Farmhouse and there is a fantastic contemporary in back of the
site. But the real surprise is that the Barn is only a few feet (like
maybe 20 or 30 ?) from the road. They don't seem to show that in the
shots we see. Particle board siding was on, vapor barrier visible, and
some red siding was on, too. - Chris
|
4.332 | Wangle... | WEFXEM::COTE | No, Kelly. I said *wits*... | Mon Oct 30 1989 13:15 | 11 |
| > only a few feet from the road...
Not that it matters, but TOH makes use of lots of wide-angle lenses
on their cameras. That would account for why things always look so
big/far/high... My guess would be they use the equivalent of a 24mm
lens. (When compared to 35mm photography.)
I'm sure it's not to be deceptive (nor did you imply same), but it's
real hard to get an interior or full exterior shot with a 'normal' lens...
Edd
|
4.333 | Stress Skins nice stuff | TRITON::FERREIRA | | Mon Oct 30 1989 13:48 | 18 |
| re: several
Not to get technical.... what many of you are observing on the
exterior of the frame are "stress skins". They are a composite
of oriented strand board on the outside (OSB), 3.5 thru 5.5 inches
of insulation, (3.5 walls - 5.5 roof), another layer of OSB and
finally Blue board one the inside, (in this instance). I used
these same panels on my house. Mine happen to be Mfg'd by Atlas
Industries in Ayer, Ma. They have very high R-values, r-26+ for
3.5" and r-42+ for the 5.5". They provide some interesting solutions
to the finishing and insulation of timber frames and some even
more intersting challenges for the electric. I shall not eleaborate
here, but, it I'm looking forward to seeing how TOH handles both.
Yup, I visit frequently but prefer to leave the viewers the opportunity
to watch the show w/o prejudice.
Happy viewing
Frank
|
4.334 | the wide-angle lies | KACIE::HENKEL | | Mon Oct 30 1989 18:30 | 28 |
| Re: camera angles
TOH certianly accentuates the positive in its filming of these
projects. I agree with the previous statement about this barn being ON
the road and awfully close to the farmhouse. Their last project in
Lexington (the bed/breakfast) also looked a lot better on videotape than it
did in person.
The previous note is probably right that you need a
wide-angle lens in order to squeeze a whole house onto your television
screen; and a beneficial side-effect is the wide-angle lens makes things
look a lot more expansive than reality.
In the same context, the
sweeping views from the pond looking up the hill to the barn (the
back-side view) isn't quite as sweeping as it looks on camera and the
pond doesn't look quite as large in real-life.
My other comment is about the very nice contemporary behind the barn.
It sure looks to me as any rear view from the barn will be aimed
directly at the contemporary (making the privacy, especially at night,
questionable).
TH
there are a couple of other things yu
|
4.335 | | ALLVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Tue Oct 31 1989 14:08 | 20 |
|
I think some people in this notes file are a little nieve. They
(the people from TOH) knew that the barn had to be torn down and
rebuilt before they even started filming the first episode. The
rest is just show. Do you really think that when they showed Norm
and that other contractor looking at the barn that it was their
first time looking at it. They probably spent hours or days looking
at it before they decided to do it. They get many applications each
year for projects, so they pick and choose what ones they want to
do. So the question is why are they doing this project where they
have to totally rebuild a barn???? The answer is : The guy doing
the timber framing is probably donating the timber and his man for
the class they're going to have for free. Do you really think TOH
would be going to all this expense if they didn't have all this
in place before they started filming the first show. They had all
the contractors lined up along with what is going to be donated
before the season began. Granted there are some hidden expences,
but I'm sure they have a good handle on them.
Mike
|
4.336 | Wish they were still using the old format... | HPSCAD::KNEWTON | There's no place like home... | Tue Oct 31 1989 19:01 | 23 |
| I agree with the other noters that would like to see the show go
back to its original format. My husband and I could have submitted
the renovations on our house for them to film. My husbands not
a professional carpenter, plumber, etc., but he has done most of
the wiring, plumbing and basic carpentry work himself. (When I
say professional, I mean he hasn't had any formal schooling. He's
worked with carpenters, an electrician and a plumber.) I don't
know how much of the work would have needed inspections or permits
though. The gas line plumbing and wiring to the box were inspected
or done by licensed professionals. We're doing just about every
room in the house over. I think we not so rich DIY's would rather
see a project like that. I know I would so long as they didn't
bring in Better Homes and Gardens to do the decorating.
Also, I kinda like the new host. I think he'll do ok once the newness
has worn off.
Hometime - I can see Carol Leibler (?) being an actress but Dean
Johnson I believe is one of the producers of the show and in this
months Practical Homeowner wrote an article on renovating. I would
say that he's not an actor.
Kathy
|
4.337 | Who is TOH targeted at? | VMSDEV::SIMAKAUSKAS | APBA is racing! | Wed Nov 01 1989 11:16 | 29 |
|
What's the definition of 'the old format'
If the old format means watching Bob operatate the front
end loader or the Bobcat, no thanks. If the old format means
watching materials being unloaded from a delivery truck, no thanks.
If the old format means visiting mansions in California, no thanks.
If the old format means visiting a shop in VT that manufactures, say,
shutters, I say do it. If it means more helpful hints from
Norm or from a letter sent in by a viewer, do it.
If the old format means showing the same thing over and over, no
thanks. That can get awfully repeatative and boring quickly. How
many times can you watch someone sanding a floor? How many minutes
of each series should be devoted to hanging wallpaper? And who would
you rather watch? The not-so experienced home owner, or the
professional? I'd rather watch the pro, and learn how to do it right,
not how to do it wrong and then how to fix the mistake.
IMO, repeating the same stuff in each series would make the show stale.
For newer viewers this would be great. For the long term viewer this
would be time to run to the bathroom.
I guess the question to ask is,
Who should TOH target? The new viewer or the viewer who has been
watching from the first show?
- John
|
4.338 | | PSTJTT::TABER | Two thoughts with but a single mind. | Wed Nov 01 1989 11:46 | 26 |
| > I guess the question to ask is,
> Who should TOH target? The new viewer or the viewer who has been
> watching from the first show?
So when they run out of mansions to tour they should switch to repairing
automobiles, because now the viewer who has been watching since before
most of the audience was born has seen all the home-related stuff, and
we wouldn't want to bore them.
There's a line that gets crossed at some point where most of the audience
has never seen the early shows. Remember the first shows? The stated
point was to show how homeowners could get renovations done while keeping
a reasonable budget throught "sweat equity." I gave up on the show (and
on sending my money to channel 2) after the farmhouse renovation. They
have either lost the thread of what they wanted to say, or else they've
changed their minds about what is being said. Or else public TV has
finally given up the dream of operating without commercials. (The only
people who are keeping the dream alive are HBO and Showtime -- viewer
funded, all the viewers "contribute." )
To meet the challenge of continuing to show how things can be done by
normal people with realistic budgets, perhaps they should go to a short
season or switch off weeks with programs targeted at audiences who want
to see Hurst Castle or who want to see how a heating system they'd never
install in a million years is done.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
4.339 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Wed Nov 01 1989 11:58 | 28 |
| > < Note 1974.268 by ALLVAX::DIAMOND "No brag, Just fact." >
>
> I think some people in this notes file are a little nieve. They
> (the people from TOH) knew that the barn had to be torn down and
> rebuilt before they even started filming the first episode.
That's probably true, but if they "lied" to the viewing public about
"renovating" and "rehabbing" the barn did they also lie to the homeowners
and to the Town of Concord? "Preservation" was one of the criteria
by which the project was justified. The phrase "obligation to the town"
was used in the last episode with regard to the design.
Did the producers go into the project with the intention of rebuilding
from scratch to show timber techniques?
If that was the case, why not just build from scratch someplace else
where they could call it new?
It WILL be a good series. Timber building is fun to watch and I'll enjoy
learning about it. The series is just off on the wrong foot with this
perception of their having made a "mistake" and the apparent lunacy
of the scope of the project.
re: Hometime....
A really useful series now about finishing the basement. I wish they'd
go a little slower on some of their jobs so the steps would be more evident.
But even if those people aren't actors, they are CERTAINLY not carpenters.
Hitting a nail straight on is a skill they haven't quite mastered....
- tom]
|
4.340 | Entertainment vs Reality | KACIE::HENKEL | | Wed Nov 01 1989 12:42 | 44 |
| I think TOH found it was impossible to do the show as a do-it-yourself
rehab format without LOTS of financial underwriting. Recall the first
couple of seasons (the rehab in Dorchester and a ranch house somewhere)
WGBH bought the property, rehabed it, and resold it. During this time,
Bob Vila did a good chunk of the work. I think WGBH found the costs of the
rehab in this format outstripped the resale price of the
property.
Then WGBH started in on cooperative deals, where the
homeowner would fund part of the job and perform some of the work.
I think the problem here was making it interesting to support a
large viewing audience. Also getting consistently good work out of the
homeowners seemed to be a problem.
So WGBH started on these slash/burn rennovations. The benefit here is
at least you get to see how professionals do the job when money is not a big
issue. So what you really see is how contractors handle commercial
projects, where the major goal is to do the job right. I think that is
very beneficial. The other benefit is there is usually something in
these projects for everyone -- bathroom, bedroom, kitchen etc. What's
not so beneficial is when you basically tear the dwelling down and
start from scratch (with new materials which are level an plumb) you
tend to circumvent many of the DYI problems which drive most of us up a
wall -- crooked walls, rotten materials, problems brought about from
years of neglect and stupidity from previous owners (see the
"why did they ever do that" note).
So you have to view TOH in perspective. While I may not be willing
(or have the wherewithall) to basically level my house and start
from scratch, I might get some interesting ideas if I'm conemplating
a new kitchen, bathroom, etc. I think you have to separate the total
project from the individual projects which go into it. Is anyone
REALLY fool enough to take a house worth maybe $200K and put $500K
worth of rennovations in it? Of course not. But you need to have
enough projects going to keep a large audience interested.
The good news, at least so far, the new guy hasn't spent half of the
show trying to learn how to run a backhoe or some other piece of heavy
machinery which happened to be on the site at the time of filming. Nor
has he spent an entire show telling us how shutters are made (I agree
this stuff is interesting, but Bob Vila used to waste a tremendous
amount of time on personal amusement and contrived field trips). I
always found it interesting that Bob Vila decided to run off to
California in February to tour every mansion and factory he could find.
|
4.341 | Good, to bad, to best | ASD::DIGRAZIA | | Fri Nov 03 1989 12:01 | 26 |
|
A mildly interesting sequence...
Day-before-yesterday I watched an older TOH with our Hero Mr. Vila
participating in a percolation test. They had dug a hole and
placed a ruler in it. Then the expected anonymous hireling poured
water from a 6-gallon red plastic gasoline can into the hole. The
professional percolation engineer explained how they measure the
time needed for the water to sink an inch, etc. I thought it was
pretty good.
Yesterday, TOH also covered percolation science. Remember that
irritating well-drilling guy? Remember all the useful info they
gave about what percolation testing is all about, and how to do
it? You don't? Hmmm. Well, score one for our Hero.
On channel 56 yesterday evening they showed The Money Pit. I think
it ran at the same time as TOH. Did TOH inspire TMP?
Regards, Robert.
PS Since we're voting: I like Vila. I hate him, too. The lucky
stiff gets to paw all over those fancy mansions.
PPS The Money Pit is ridiculously silly, but I love the Plumber
Gang. The movie makes one big mistake: the house actually
gets finished.
|
4.342 | This Old Contractor | CLOSET::T_PARMENTER | Hooly-mala-wala-dala | Fri Nov 03 1989 12:25 | 11 |
| Bob Vila got into TOH in the first place because he was doing home
renovations.
I believe he was set up by WGBH, who approved every single one of his
endorsement deals and then fired him when they conflicted with one of
WGBH's endorsement deals. WGBH was only paying him $40,000 a year as
host of the top-rated show on the network and were getting out of
paying him more by letting him take endorsements.
The real purpose of the show is entertainment, not education, and I
think it's pretty entertaining. How about those Wickwires!
|
4.343 | its the only construction ON Strawberry Hill Rd | ISLNDS::BELKIN | 6/*/74! | Fri Nov 03 1989 14:17 | 12 |
|
I drove by the Wickwire place yesterday... and... I had to look
twice to make sure it was the right place!
Wide angle camera lenses??? The film crew must be using
8 mm fisheye lenses!!
re: last night's episode, and the inevitable cardboard model of
the new barn.. Didja notice how the Architect who was showing it
even admitted that it was "expensive but worth it" ?!?!?!
Josh
|
4.344 | | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Fri Nov 03 1989 17:54 | 9 |
|
> How about those Wickwires!
Clearly a case of having more dollars than sense.
I like the new host but I can't help but wonder why he bothers to wear
those suspenders. Did anyone else notice how much slack he keeps in them?
JP
|
4.345 | plans DO change | 57112::MAY | | Mon Nov 06 1989 10:57 | 7 |
| If you noticed the right side view(Looking from front)..there were a
few small windows in the model..When you look at the barn as it stands
now, there is an "arrow type" insulation markout going up the side of
the barn. It looks like a fireplace/chimney might be going there..
john
|
4.346 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Fri Nov 10 1989 16:08 | 9 |
| re: << Note 1974.261 by CADSE::MCCARTHY "I have never calculated the odds sir." >>>
> Lets see Bob at Sears....will he team up with Cheryl Tiegs and give
> tips on how to look good in a mesh bathing suit :-)
I can't imagine that even Sears would have the bad taste to put
Bob Villa in a mesh bathing suit!
But then again, I'm getting old....
|
4.347 | Say wha'? | WEFXEM::COTE | OK, who wants a Tangwich??? | Fri Nov 10 1989 19:17 | 16 |
| I like the new guy. Last night he asked a question the manufacturer of
the post and beam houses didn't want to here...
"Those sure are big beams. Those trees must have been old..."
"Yeah, over 500 years."
"How do you justify ripping down a 500 year old tree??"
"{mumble} {cough} We, um, we have a responsibility
to the wood. It's OK because we are building a house
designed to last that long..."
A responsibility to the wood??? Sounds like a yuppie Nissan commercial.
Edd
|
4.348 | Where's the new "old wood" going to come from? | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Mon Nov 13 1989 00:27 | 13 |
| Well, I can't say as I'm all that happy about using up the really old
wood. I certainly wouldn't want to see it used for toothpicks or 2x4s.
So, yuppie sentiment or no, I agreed with him to an extent - if you're
going to use the old wood, think in terms of the replacement (i.e. if
the building lasts as long as the tree stood, it's "not so bad").
Unfortunately, the lumber companies don't work that way. When they cut
down the old wood, they don't plant a stand which will be left alone
for 500 years. They plant the fast growing stuff that can be turned
around in about three decades. So the old forests don't *get* replaced.
I'd frankly prefer to see the timbers made out of laminated boards (for
strength and durability, which is the claim made for the old wood) and
leave the ancient wood in the forest.
|
4.349 | laminated beams are expensive | TRITON::FERREIRA | | Mon Nov 13 1989 11:51 | 7 |
| re. last
Have you priced laminated beams? Having just built a P&B I looked into those
for both the preservation reasons and for the stability they offer. They were
cost prohibitive with my budget. Also, the non-machine jointery is nearly
impossible with dry wood. The discussion belongs in the Environmental notes
but, the process costs would have to be dramatically lowered before laminates
could become cost effective for the general public. I know pay now or....
|
4.350 | SET MODE=HYPE | KACIE::HENKEL | | Mon Nov 13 1989 12:00 | 14 |
| "we have a responsibility to the wood" could also be loosly
translated to read: "this stuff is so expensive, so we can't afford to
screw it up." ;-) I agree the post and beam guy went a little
overboard in trying to sound like a socially-responsible killer of
500-year-old trees.
All in all, I think the new guy needs some polish on his factory tour
presentation. I think good old Bob did a better job (of course he
had LOTS of practice).
I particularly enjoyed the part on the last show where the new guy
stuck his fingers into the congealing insulation material -- then the
plant owner informed him that the stuff would have to wear off over
time.
|
4.351 | | CIMNET::MIKELIS | Just browsing through time... | Wed Nov 15 1989 15:51 | 7 |
| RE: Old trees
I also didn't like the idea that Japan is getting a lot of our old
trees becasue they 'respect' the wood.
-jim
|
4.352 | Update on Wickwires place | CIMNET::MIKELIS | Just browsing through time... | Wed Nov 15 1989 16:00 | 34 |
| Stopped by the Wickwire's yesterday.
Got there in time to watch TOH them film a sequence in front of the barn.
The crew was working on a raised entrance way with a stone border and
a couple of granite steps leading up. Steve was going over a line something
like, "these steps should last a lifetime", and the director said, "say, these
steps should last forever", or something like that. They went over the line
4 or 5 times. They were also going to put in a light at the corner of the
wall and Steve was saying something like "were going to build the wall around
the light rather then put the light in the wall". It was a riot to watch.
Steve closed the show with his usual lines, and, "...next week we'll be
designing a kitchen and putting in plumbing". TOH also getting ready
to do some fund drive promo stuff - is it that time already?
Took a walk down to the pond and petted the dog. The house in the back
is gigantic! Kind of strange though, their driveway cuts between the pond
and the barn. I wonder who owns the land? I also took a look inside the
barn but it looks as though they only have the framing done. Then Steve
walked buy and said, "How're you doing?" Norm wasn't around. Someone
was looking for him but he was sent on an errand and was gone for
over an hour - probably stuck in traffic somewhere.
Personally, i would of lived in the farmhouse. I thought that it looked
really nice. The Concord area is beautiful. There is a great pasture
directly across the street from the Wickwire's with a pond or two where a
couple of people were riding horses. There is also a large pink Victorian
on the far edge of the Wickwire's pond up on a small hill which you never
see on the show.
I still couldn't justify the cost of the project - even at 250K alone.
-jim
|
4.353 | My opinion... | HPSCAD::KNEWTON | There's no place like home... | Wed Nov 15 1989 16:04 | 9 |
| Please let me know if I don't know what I'm talking about here.
Back about 200 years ago, I don't know if they looked for 200 year
old trees, but a lot of houses seemed to have lasted that long.
I really don't see why they need to go to such an extreme by cutting
down 500 year old trees. Who's going to want to live in a house
that old anyway?
Kathy
|
4.354 | | BCSE::YANKES | | Wed Nov 15 1989 16:28 | 21 |
|
I don't know of any connection between the age of the tree and how
long the timbers will last for. Seems to me that the strength and
durability of the timbers are based more on their wood type, size,
quantity/size of knots, straightness of grain, etc. than on how long
the tree was standing. Granted, a 500 year old tree has withstood more
wind gusts (and thus statistically a high chance of stronger gusts) than
did a tree "only" 200 years or 100 years or even 50 years old. But is it
stronger enough to justify cutting down a 500 year old tree? I doubt it.
And even if it was, designing the building to such close structural
tolerences that a 500 year old beam is good while a 200 year old beam
wouldn't work is a tad bit too close to collapsing for my pleasure.
My guess is that the timber guy who made the "well, this house will
last for 500 years then" crack was just caught off-guard by the
question and wasn't thinking. One can only hope! (I suspect that the
real answer is that for the size timber they needed, the only forests
that haven't already been cut down that could provide it were the
500 year old forests.)
-craig
|
4.355 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | How do you get this car out of second gear? | Wed Nov 15 1989 16:50 | 10 |
| They did look for the 200-500 year old trees, but not necessarily for the age.
They needed such trees for their size! Much old construction has massive
wooden beams (like many here at the Mill). In colonial times, the British
would wander the forests looking for really tall, straight trees for ship's
masts, and mark them. It was a serious crime for commoners to cut such a
marked tree. Most of the large trees were eventually cut. Regular Eastern
White Pine will get very large if you let it, but there aren't that many larger
than "normal" tree sized.
-Mike
|
4.356 | | SMURF::DIBBLE | D&H Travel Agent | Wed Nov 15 1989 16:53 | 7 |
| When my wife was in England a few years back, she visited a pub
that had a plaque reading (paraphrased) "Rebuilt in 1682". Which
I guess goes to show, that if your country is around long enough,
there is potential for a building to last 500 yrs... We just
happen to live in one of your 'newer' countries.
bld
|
4.357 | age is relative | NYEM1::MILBERG | Barry Milberg | Wed Nov 15 1989 22:55 | 12 |
| re .289
Must put in the line that came out a couple of years ago when I
brought some good_ole_Southern_boys up to Maynard and we stayed
in Concord at the old inn in town.
As we walked around the square, one of them remarked at the age
of the buildings and that they were still around. Another answered-
"remember, MR. Sherman didn't come thru here!"
-Barry-
|
4.358 | Sawmills were a luxury once... | TALLIS::LEACH | | Thu Nov 16 1989 08:54 | 9 |
|
Formerly, trees were selected based upon the dimension required for
the job, not their age. This is why sometimes remnants of bark remain
on hand hewn timbers. One would be certifiably crazy were he to hew a
200 year old 4' diameter tree just to get a 10x10.
Older trees were generally used for furniture and finish work.
Patrick
|
4.359 | Who needs nukes | PAXVAX::COOK | Yes, but am I paranoid enough? | Thu Nov 16 1989 12:13 | 12 |
|
re. .290
Otherwise known as the 1865 urban renewal plan.
When I moved up here last year it was a bit incredible to be shown
homes that were built in 1850. There is not much left in Georgia,
homes or trees, that were around before the war.
al
|
4.360 | $30K BUDGET OVERRUN-FACT or FICTION?? | FORCE::HQCONSOL | | Fri Nov 17 1989 13:49 | 13 |
| RE: TOH - Thurs 11/16/89
Did I hear Tom Silva and Norm correctly last night when discussing
the fireplace for the Wickwire P&B home, that they are already $30K
over budget!!!! ??????
I think Norm said that they already to be over budget about $30K
and that the proposed fireplace/chimney could add another $5K.
If I remeber the original budget, the Wickwires were putting up
$250K and TOH was providing approx. $150K in vendor donated goods
and services. So Norm was telling us they were already over their
$400K budget.......This Old *EXPENSIVE* House indeed!!!
|
4.361 | Extrapolate from where they are... | MARX::SULLIVAN | I hate being a grownup! Can I be 8 again? | Fri Nov 17 1989 16:08 | 10 |
| My guess would be that he means they are currently 30K over their line item
budget. Construction cost are usually done by line item. So, if for what they
have done so far the projected costs had been 100K, and they are at 130K
then they are 30K over budget.
It is possible that other items can come in at less then plan (although
doubtful, especially with the TOH crew). But if they are already 30K over,
I'd hate to see what the overrun will be in the end.
Mark
|
4.362 | I belong to OLA (Old-house Lovers Anonymous) | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Fri Nov 17 1989 20:28 | 21 |
|
RE: Note 1974.286 by HPSCAD::KNEWTON "There's no place like home..." >
> Who's going to want to live in a house that old anyway?
Answer: *ME* for one! I've seen lovely buildings in Europe that
are easily that old. And I'm sure there will be people
who want to live in our colonial homes 200 years from now
(assuming people still inhabit the planet).
RE: Note 1974.292 PAXVAX::COOK "Yes, but am I paranoid enough?"
> When I moved up here last year it was a bit incredible to be shown
> homes that were built in 1850. There is not much left in Georgia,
> homes or trees, that were around before the war.
Ah, you haven't been to the right part of Georgia! Savannah
was not burned by Sherman (they surrendered to save their city),
and it's one of the loveliest cities in the South.
|
4.363 | Old Homes in the South | OASS::RAMSEY_B | Don't become a statistic | Fri Nov 17 1989 21:17 | 6 |
| Macon also has some old Victorian homes because Sherman took a differnt
path to go farther south through Georiga. There are even some pockets
of old homes in Atlanta. Marietta has several houses on the national
registar, Roswell as well. I will agree though that one must look
to find these old houses and that the percentage of old houses is
much higher in the north than in the south.
|
4.364 | Wonder how what's his name would have handled this? | WFOV11::KOEHLER | Get naked, enjoy the cold temps. | Fri Dec 22 1989 10:31 | 10 |
| During last nights show someguy was talking to Steve and mentioned
something about permits and things not being legal....I tuned in
late and did not catch all the conversation......What's going on?
From what I heard, it sounds like some #@$%^# neighbor is trying
to flex her yuppie/upper class clout to cause trouble. I'm sure
glad that doesn't happen in my neighborhood.
Jim
|
4.365 | | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | | Fri Dec 22 1989 10:47 | 12 |
| That someguy was the owner of the barn. He was on his way to court
because some woman filed an appeal concerning the permits. Apparently
she is alleging that they started construction (or destruction)
before the permits were granted and also (not quite sure of this
part) that TOH misled the town concerning what they were going to
do - rebuild as opposed to renovate.
I'll bet she's not even a neighbor.
George
|
4.366 | I was straining to hear the conversation... | WFOV11::KOEHLER | Get naked, enjoy the cold temps. | Fri Dec 22 1989 10:50 | 3 |
| Sorry..."someguy".....Mr. Wickwire.
Jim
|
4.367 | It's not uncommon and shouldn't have been a surprise | PETERJ::JOHNSON | | Fri Dec 22 1989 11:31 | 6 |
| Just for the record, he is dealing with his lawyer, not the court. The neighbor
filed an appeal with the planning board, who will hear arguments some weeks
from now and make a decision some weeks from then.
Apparently capricious filings like this usually emanate from an individual who
has suffered an adverse ruling in the past and hopes to leverage a reversal.
|
4.368 | Cut! | CIMNET::MIKELIS | Just browsing through time... | Fri Dec 22 1989 16:12 | 13 |
| Well the episode which i watched TOH shoot more than a month ago
finally came on last night. I think i saw myself in the background
during the closing footage when Steve was saying his usual lines.
I remember the director (or someone) yelling at a couple of us for walking
by in camera view of the shooting. Oh well - probably the only chance i'll
ever get to be on national T.V.-)
I also found it interesting to listen to Steve mention the bit about the
granite steps lasting a thousand years. It seemed so natural when he
said it - however, in reality took about 5 times to get it right.
The miracle of editing...
-jim
|
4.369 | Must be Anna again | LDYBUG::MCGOLDRICK | | Fri Dec 22 1989 19:41 | 16 |
|
re: .297,298
The plaintiff is probably Anna Thompson, who is far from a
yuppie_whatever_you_called_her. Concord has been the victim
of many less_than_scrupulous developers, especially during the
'80s real estate craze. So what else is new. Apparently TOH
qualifies, as they took liberties with the permit process.
You know: "well, Norm, we'll re-use part of the foundation and
that will qualify as just remodeling, eh?"
Big $$$s usually win, but Anna is a self-appointed gatekeeper
of the town officials' (and others') integrity. She's not
afraid to take on anybody.
I like people like her - your mileage may differ.
|
4.370 | What happen to the radiant heating system? | SOLAR1::FERREIRA | | Tue Dec 26 1989 10:14 | 5 |
| I was reading our GBH guide and though I read that this past episode was on the
installation of the radiant heat..... Did I fall asleep or miss a week along
the way.
Frank
|
4.371 | Too much time on her hands | WJOUSM::MARCHETTI | Mama said there'd be days like this. | Tue Dec 26 1989 11:27 | 11 |
| re .302
Yes, it is Anna Thompson. She can be characterized as a "gadfly". She
was removed from the a town board (planning or housing) a few years ago
by the other members and has made a point to stick it to the town
whenever she gets the chance. My own opinion is that she has become
ineffective because most people consider her a bit whacky. She is also
costing the town (and we taxpayers) about $20,000 to defend her
lawsuit.
Bob
|
4.372 | Let's try the facts, please | LDYBUG::MCGOLDRICK | | Tue Dec 26 1989 14:13 | 10 |
| re:.304
The question is: did TOH take liberties with the permit process?
Let's get some facts posted. Do you have any info from the Journal
you could post?
Please don't try to dismiss the issue by making innuendos about
Ms. Thompson. Whether "most people consider her a bit whacky"
or not has little to do with whether town officials are playing
fast and loose with the rules for the benefit of TOH.
|
4.373 | Maybe she should work on something meaningful | WJOUSM::MARCHETTI | Mama said there'd be days like this. | Tue Dec 26 1989 19:00 | 21 |
| Let's see. Old barn rotting away and a potential safety hazard.
Couple wants to build a new structure that resembles the old one and is
far more attractive. Building inspector is on the premises when
demolition takes place. Yup, looks like a clear case of TOHSTUTAATRTTR
(This Old House Scams The Unsuspecting Town And Anna Thompson Rides To
The Rescue).
The town thinks it has done the right thing, and Anna Thompson disagrees.
The courts will decide whose "facts" are correct. Forgive me if I find
Anna Thompson to be a "Chicken Little", but she's done this type of thing
enough times to have lost her credibility. Unfortunately, it will cost
the taxpayers money that we could use for far more useful things.
Normally, this would be amusing, but not when it's costing me money.
BTW, I think most people who drive through Concord would not agree with
your statement that developers went crazy during the 80's. The town
has spent millions of $ on preserving open space and is considered a
desirable place to live.
Bob
|
4.374 | TOH won the battle | KACIE::HENKEL | | Tue Jan 02 1990 12:57 | 22 |
| I read last week in the Middlesex News that TOH won the court battle.
Apparantly, Thompson's complaint was not given too much consideration
because she was not an abutting property owner, and therefore not
damaged in any way by the TOH development.
My understanding of the issue was that Thompson was claiming that the
Wickwires and TOH engaged in a bit of decit in securing permits to
"rennovate" the barn when they knew in advance that the thing would
have to be torn down. I have to admit that I sort of wondered the same
thing as the show progressed. The first couple of shows, I got the
feeling old Norm was nervous even being in the structure. And some of
the insect damage was clearly visible.
You have to believe that one of the first things TOH would have done
before even considering this project is bring in a structural engineer
to provide an assessment of how sturdy the post and beam structure was.
If they didn't do this, they deserve what they got!
Given TOH basically junked most of the old structure, it sure appears
that the structural problems with the old structure were far from
subtle. So you have to wonder if the decision to raze the old barn,
and build a new post and beam replacement wasn't a planned oops!
|
4.375 | | MARX::SULLIVAN | I hate being a grownup! Can I be 8 again? | Tue Jan 02 1990 13:14 | 24 |
| re: court case
DDoes it really matter how much of the structure was razed? It is my
understanding that even if only one board remains from the original structure,
that is good enough according to law.
There was a case in my town recently (Bolton, MA.) where a developer
wanted to change an "existing, nonconforming" building (the building was
built before the newer setback bylaws so it was grandfathered) into the new
post office. He razed the entire building except for one corner of the
foundation which he intended to incorporate into the new structure. He got
into trouble when the guys digging the area for the new portion of the
construction "accidently" knocked down the little that remained of the
old building. After MUCH legal haggling, he was allowed to continue his
project.
I've been told that this is common practice. It is why you sometimes
hear about skyscrapers being built over old portions of existing buildings. They
get to classify the project as "renovation of the existing structure" that way.
At some later point they apply for another renovation permit and remove what
remained of the older building.
Mark
|
4.376 | Legal maybe, but responsible? | KACIE::HENKEL | | Wed Jan 03 1990 12:08 | 32 |
| re -1.
Given the case was thrown out, I guess you're probably right. Concord
is one of those communities trying to restrict overdevelopment and
preserve the historical features of the town, and there may be some
additional local rules which cast varying shades of grey on
the legality of TOH's action.
Recall that in the first show of the season, the Wickwires stated that they
petitioned the town to do something funny with the lot (I don't
recall the details) but my recollection is they didn't have enough land
to officially subdivide the original parcel into two lots;
so the barn was being rennovated and would officially be listed as a
condominium. So I guess the the parcel is comes under the heading of
a planned diverse residential development (PDRD), or something to this
effect. I don't live in Concord, so I don't have a clue as to what
rules might be attached to such a development. But in general such
deals often give the town more flexiblity to make demands on the
developer than if you have a legitimate building lot. So, and I'm
gussing here, the basis of the allegation that the original petition
to the town was misleading rests in the claim that the rennovation
of an old barn ( i.e., preserving a historical element of the town)
into a condo, turned out to be the destruction of an old barn and
building a new free standing single-family home in its place. I don't
know, but it sounds a bit shady to me.
Also, judging from the previous comments, it sounds like the person who
filed the complaint is somewhat notorious in the community. So maybe
the whole thing was simply frivolous from the start. Maybe TOH didn't
actually break any laws, but it sure sounds like they bent a few
(hardly consistent with the socially-conscious image WBGH tries to
project). Perhaps that was the underlying message in the whole case.
|
4.377 | Let up on them just a little, OK? | ISLNDS::HAMER | down is free | Wed Jan 03 1990 16:19 | 36 |
| So Santa left Sanctimonious Pills in our stockings this Christmas, eh?
I don't know the particulars of this case (and neither, apparently, has
anyone else who has replied) but I have dealt with the boards of old
small New England towns for quite some time now. In my opinion, for the
individual homeowner, the regulatory world goes 'round on the wink and
handshake method.
Show of hands here: how many of you folks who have built, rebuilt,
remodelled, etc. have done so without **any** informal arrangement
with an inspector or board, without a single wink, single "you are
really supposed to but..."?
To skewer TOH if they started construction before they physically had
the building permit-- which everybody connected with the process knew
they were going to get-- is unrealistic.
Everyone connected with the project, insofar as has been shown on the
program, has been very concerned with preserving the essential
appearance and barn-ness of the damn thing. To criticize them for
starting from scratch when they had planned only to rebuild and
preserve an existing structure when the difference is a couple of
boards is pretty silly. Much of the original foundation is incorporated
into the new barn, as much of the timber as possible was either used in
the frame or is being turned into bookshelves or something by Norm
"I'll let him think he's the star" Abrams.
Given that the primary use of the structure was not to be maintained,
griping because the original boards are gone makes very little sense.
It is this last which really separates the folks concerned with
historical preservation from the cranks and newcomers: no New England
resident of sound mind 135 years ago when the barn was built (or 350
years ago when Concord was young, for that matter) would be caught dead
living in a barn. Barns were for animals.
John H.
|
4.378 | | STRATA::RUDMAN | Always the Black Knight. | Wed Jan 10 1990 18:43 | 22 |
| I haven't been in this file for a long time--it was fun to read
about the 88-89 season in one sitting.
Sidetrack: Going back to the initial barn walk-through, it was
obvious to us the inspection was done tongue-in-cheek.
We also felt that as laminated beams were used along with the
500-year old trees it seemed to us they could have used laminate
100%. Good advertising for the building suppliers. But then, all
those woodworkers from all over the country probably wouldn't have
come all that way to work on laminate...
I feel Steve is improving. I also feel they should have kept to
the initial format (Norm participating more in the dialogue) designed
to help Steve (and us) more comfortably ease into the role of a
new host.
And with his nautical experience, maybe they'll renovate--oops;
that means they have to tear it down to the water--remodel a
houseboat...
Don
|
4.379 | Caulk must be the answer to everything | CSMADM::MARCHETTI | Mama said there'd be days like this. | Mon Feb 05 1990 15:35 | 13 |
| I'm not generally into Norm bashing, but his "craftsman" approach to
casing a window on the last show left me (nearly) speechless. For
those of you who missed it, he nailed the casing to the window jamb,
and used caulk to fill in the gap between the wall and the outer edge
of the casing! Of course, he did use his finger to smooth off the bead
of caulk. Must be a technique only taught to master carpenters.
Fast, yes. Effective, maybe, and probably not too noticeable with
curtains on the windows. But "craftsmanlike", hardly.
Bob
|
4.380 | And the next question is... | VMSSPT::NICHOLS | Herb -CSSE support for VMS at ZK | Mon Feb 05 1990 15:50 | 1 |
| What is the 'craftsman' approach?
|
4.381 | Or just slop some chaulk on it | OASS::RAMSEY_B | Put the wet stuff on the red stuff | Mon Feb 05 1990 16:51 | 6 |
| Well "Master Craftsman" Norm suggested at least two other alternatives.
Use shims and shim the outside edge of the trim. OR use a hand plane
and plane the trim to fit the wall.
Norm did not mention this but you could get some joint compound and
make the wall fit the trim.
|
4.382 | Saving it for the grand finale? | ARCHER::FOX | | Mon Feb 05 1990 16:59 | 11 |
| Am I missing something, or are they not giving costs during this
project?
Every time I say "jeez, can't wait to see what *this* costs!, they
move right along to the next scene. For example:
The custom stairway, that had to be a whopper.
The "pot luck" driveway. I'm sure those are not cost-effective.
The monster of a heating system! That's exactly what I would like
to do (minus burying it in concrete), but want to see costs!
What gives?
John
|
4.383 | the stairs were free! | WRKSYS::SIMS | | Mon Feb 05 1990 17:14 | 7 |
|
to 1974.315
That custom stairway was DONATED by the company that made it! Hope
it was worth it to them in advertising....what WAS their name again?
|
4.384 | Is that driveway that good? | KACIE::HENKEL | | Mon Feb 05 1990 17:22 | 12 |
| RE:.-2
Speaking of this driveway, they kept praising the guy who owns this
paving company for doing such a wonderful thing for the environment --
i.e., recycling old asphalt roofing shingles (and apparently anything
else that could be chopped up and thrown into the mixture). Is this
sort of paving mixture environmentally responsible? I mean, using
contaminated soil as part of the mixture makes me wonder what sort of
chemicals might be present in this material. It sounded like this
paving contractor accepted refuse from all sorts of sources. I didn't
get the feeling he asked too many questions about where the material
came from.
|
4.385 | | PSTJTT::TABER | Opposites impact | Mon Feb 05 1990 17:28 | 11 |
| Unless they've changed their tactics, they never include the cost of "donated"
material or labor in the final reconing of the project. So in the final episode
the barn might well come in for $1,000 or so... pretty neat, huh? And WGBH
asks me for money?!?!!!
Re: window casing -- us craftsmens put the caulk on the casing BEFORE we nails
'em up! That way, we don't hafta get our fingers dirty smoothing out the
bead. But seriously folks -- window casings leak air sooner or later. I
always calk around the casing. It looks neat and it keeps the breeze out.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
4.386 | I'd be happy with 10% of the donations!!! | OASS::RAMSEY_B | Put the wet stuff on the red stuff | Mon Feb 05 1990 17:44 | 14 |
| The inital budget was $250,000 if I remember correctly. The Wickwires
said that they may be able to come up with a little more for cost
overruns. At the time they mentioned that they felt there would be
additional expenses and services which would be donated to the tune of
$150,000 to $200,000! No wonder the competetion to have TOH "fix up"
your home is so fierce.
When they asked Tommy Silva (contractor) what he thought of pre built
staircases, he said he liked it and he could have built a staircase for
the house but he would not have donated it.
How did you like the way the heating/plumbing contractor said that he
"pulled a few strings" and got a new tank installed and filled with
oil in under a week?
|
4.387 | cheaper to hire someone to carry me up and down... | ARCHER::FOX | | Mon Feb 05 1990 17:53 | 7 |
| Yeah, I remembered that "donation" comment by Silva, but despite
the fact that 50%+/- is being donated, it would be nice to know
what some of these items will cost those without a production crew
in the backyard.
How many hours went into those stairs? I can imagine....
John
|
4.388 | | MAMIE::THOMS | digital index operator | Mon Feb 05 1990 17:55 | 8 |
|
> How many hours went into those stairs? I can imagine....
>
> John
~250 hrs. to construct the staircase.
Ross
|
4.389 | | ALLVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Mon Feb 05 1990 18:09 | 15 |
|
FYI : The $250k cost to the Wickwires dosn't include what is being donated.
If you remember the episode before the staircase was installed Norm
and Steve were talking about keeping the cost to $250k. They said
that if the staircase wasn't donated that they would have gone over
the $250k budget. So the Wickwires are still paying out $250. Add
in the donations and this house would cost the rest of us about $400k
to build.
250 hrs to build that staircase. I'd bet the labor rate they figure
in is at least $50, probably more like $100. Then the cost to ship
it. We're talking about $20k-$40k. In some areas of the country
you can buy a whole house for that much!!!
Mike
|
4.390 | I still would have picked a better spot to live. | WFOV11::KOEHLER | It's a Brat,NO! SuBrat! | Tue Feb 06 1990 10:49 | 16 |
| This last show blew me away.....
The heating system with the control panel and the piping "so" neatly
connected to the wall...and no place for the smoke (at least till
it gets warmer) The color, well that's another story.
The window caulking made my wife cringe....at least the way it was
applied. I try to seal a window casing before I do the trim.
The floor tile......the tiles "looked" so uneven the I would hate
to walk across them in bare feet with the fear of leaving half a
toe stuck under one of them.
Jim.....
p.s. I sorta live in a barn, but not like the Wickwires...:-)
|
4.391 | My kingdom for a staircase | DECLNE::WATKINS | Elvis is living in Peoria | Tue Feb 06 1990 14:02 | 8 |
| One other comment on the staircase. On the show where they went to the
stair factory the President said they usually send someone to oversee
the installation of a complicated staircase such as the one for TOH.
That trip is included in the price they quote.
Being from the Midwest I had heard of this company before. Most of
their products are stairs that are open and not carpeted so all of the
woodwork is showing.
|
4.392 | | JUPTR::CRITZ | Greg LeMond - Sportsman of the Year | Tue Feb 06 1990 14:46 | 6 |
| About a week ago, Steve visited an ultra-modern, home of the
future. Much of the house was plastic.
I wonder how much that thing cost?
Scott
|
4.393 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Feb 06 1990 14:53 | 6 |
| Re: .32
See the latest (March?) issue of Popular Science for what I expect was the
GE "house of the future" you saw on the show.
Steve
|
4.394 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Wed Feb 07 1990 11:52 | 9 |
| re: .315 and costs per item
They never talk detailed costs on TOH.
Sometimes, on the last show, Bob used to put up a poster board
with gross budget items like "plumbing - $12,000, landscaping - $18,000"
and so forth, but you never learn what the furnace cost, or the kitchen
tile, or the spiffy new truss system. Sometimes, as in the case of the
stairs, a figure like the "250 hours" will drop that you can use
to guess out the money, but not too often.
|
4.395 | but where is the $100 staircase? | BCSE::YANKES | | Wed Feb 07 1990 14:53 | 11 |
|
They used a staircase that would have cost $20,000 to $40,000? I sure
hope the WGBH executives aren't sitting up at night wondering why I don't watch
TOH. A project that is a total rebuilding is bad enough, but this?
It might be boring as anything, but I'd rather watch them show how to
measure and cut stringers for a home-built staircase. I took every measurement
I could think of and double-checked everything, but the stairs I made going into
our attic _still_ didn't come out "just right". (Close enough, but still...)
-craig
|
4.396 | WHAT! | EDITOR::MCCARTHY | its only 500 miles a week | Fri Feb 09 1990 16:44 | 11 |
| What no comments on the test of a GFI the electrican gave!
One little line "I don't suggest you do this at home." was the only
warning. I was in shock (no pun intended) when I saw him drop that
light in to the bucket of water. First off, maybe the bulb just blew,
who says the GFI went, he would have been surprized if he reached in
for it instead of unplugging it. What a REALLY STUPID way to
demonstrate a GFI. I am still wondering WHY they did it, JUST PLAIN
STUPID.
bjm
|
4.397 | Oh, I forgot. It comes in pretty colors, too! | ARCHER::FOX | | Fri Feb 09 1990 17:45 | 8 |
| RE .327
True, they never seem to mention how much a particular item costs,
but for something like the driveway, they have to give potential
buyers more than just "you're helping the environment using my
product". Something like "since I get my materials so cheap, my
driveway is more cost effective than asphalt". BUT NOOOOOOOOOO!
John
|
4.398 | Stupid Electrician Tricks | ISLNDS::HAMER | CASWAG | Mon Feb 12 1990 15:51 | 7 |
| Also stupid was the "check the GFI every month-- that's a must"
while putting the GFI in the box in the basement where there is
no realistic way in the world it is ever going to be checked monthly.
I was really disappointed in that electrician.
John H.
|
4.399 | amazing, isn't it? | KACIE::HENKEL | | Mon Feb 12 1990 18:15 | 9 |
| I suppose you could just drop a light in the bathtub every month to
test the GFI. Sure sounds more convinent than going ALL the way to the
basement to flip the switch ;^)
I'm still amazed they put something like that on television. All in a
state that mandates you hire a "licensed" electrician to ensure saftey
-- I sure feel safer knowing there are licensed electricians like this
one out there.
|
4.400 | I don't think so | AKOV13::FULTZ | ED FULTZ | Mon Feb 12 1990 19:44 | 6 |
| Mass doesn't require you hire a licensed electrician that I know of.
The homeowner can do his/her own electrical. It is the plumbing that
must be licensed.
Ed..
|
4.401 | | TOOK::SWIST | Jim Swist LKG2-2/T2 DTN 226-7102 | Tue Feb 13 1990 11:38 | 2 |
| re .-1, .-2 You're both right. Mandated use of a licensed electrician
is a town-by-town decision in Mass.
|
4.402 | Wickwire Building Permit Follow-up | LDYBUG::MCGOLDRICK | | Tue Feb 13 1990 14:39 | 78 |
| re: .297-.310
For anyone interested, I have appended the follow-up article
from the Concord Journal about the contesting of the Wickwire
building permit. It appeared a few weeks ago.
APPEAL BOARD HOLDS WICKWIRE RECAP
Using the Wickwire's conversion of a Strawberry Hill Road barn
into a residence as a "hypothetical" case, the Board of Appeals agreed
that it would ask more questions if it had to rule on a similar matter.
The discussion was prompted by a letter from Selectmen Chairman
William Sullivan which requested a review of "the substantial issues and
questions raised by Mrs. Thompson's appeal of the building inspector's
decision."
The board previously ruled that the appeal submitted by College
Road resident Anna Thompson was invalid because Thompson, neither a
neighbor nor an aggrieved party, had no legal standing.
Thompson questioned whether the work now being done on the barn,
which is the subject of this season's "This Old House" on public tele-
vision, is renovation or reconstruction . She also questioned the
timing of a building permit issued by Building Inspector Brad Nyhan.
Board Member Mario Favorito said in the Wickwires' case, the
board was more concerned with the issue of density than the final
appearance of the barn when it issued the permit.
"Should we have addressed the issue of the historical nature
of the barn?" Favorito said. "in retrospect, we probably should."
Jerry Vigneron noted that a barn owner could first fix up his
barn, changing its appearance with skylights or dormers, without coming
to the board if it remains as a barn. Once the renovations are com-
pleted, the owner then could come to the board to request a special
permit to change it into a residence.
In the Wickwire's case, the permit was issued on the understanding
that the barn's frame could be salvaged. But once the frame was exposed,
it was found to be unusable because of insect damage and rot. The frame
was consequently torn down.
The board agreed that if a structure is damaged by sudden and
accidental causes covered under a casualty insurance policy, then the
restoration bylaw does not apply.
"What happened to the barn was not a crisis," said Vigneron,
"because the damage was caused by natural wear and tear and bug damage."
"That kind of deterioration that happens in a 100- to 200-year
old building is to be expected," he said.
"I think this one just flew right by us," said Chairman Kate
Clark Flora.
Associate member Frank Paparello suggested a renovation would be
acceptable if the structure ended up with the same outside appearance.
"So long as it looked like it did before, they can do anything
with it," he proposed, which would prevent "losing all these old structures
that can't be maintained."
Flora didn't agree.
"I'm hung up on the existing building means something," Flora
said. "Is it restored even if it is totally rebuilt?"
"I'm a little nervous about essentially wiping out a building
and starting over," Vignero said. "That's what will happen."
The board did not formulate a definite position because it was
not acting upon an official appeal.
Selectman Fan Cabot, Thompson, and Lynn Wickwire were present
at the meeting.
|
4.403 | The Breaker Box is a GOOD place for GIFs | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Tue Feb 13 1990 19:42 | 26 |
| > <<< Note 1974.331 by ISLNDS::HAMER "CASWAG" >>>
> -< Stupid Electrician Tricks >-
>
> Also stupid was the "check the GFI every month-- that's a must"
> while putting the GFI in the box in the basement where there is
> no realistic way in the world it is ever going to be checked monthly.
In homes that have forced air heating/cooling the furnace filters
should be checked and cleaned once a month. They're most often in
the basement.
If you have a water softener you have to check it and add salt as
necessary at least once a month. Its probably in the basement.
The circuit breaker box is required to be accessable -- its no
harder to get at than the furnace or water softener. So why would
the GFI test not be done? HINT: Its the same reason that most
people don't test the in-wall GFIs in their kitchens and
bathrooms.
I've always thought that GFIs *BELONG* in the breaker box. Those
in-wall units always look like an unplanned afterthought to me.
Yes, this is one man's opinion, but I flatter myself that mine is
at least as good as another's.
Charlie-with-several-GFIs-in-the-breaker-box-in-his-basement
|
4.404 | I liked the GFI in the breaker | PARITY::KLEBES | John F. Klebes | Tue Feb 13 1990 21:19 | 18 |
| I like the idea of the GFI in the basement circuit box. I had a GFI
circuit box breaker in the basement of my old house. It had a large
sticker on the door with a place to date it each time the GFI was
tested. Every time I needed to reset a breaker or work on any
electrical DYI I saw that GFI and the Test history sticker and would
be reminded to test it again. I don't think I ever went more than two
months without making an unplanned test of that GFI.
In my present house the GFI is in the bathroom outlet. I don't think
I have tested it since I moved in! (I think I'll make a note to test
it tonight) Since I see it every day it just seems to fade into the
background. I just don't think about it with it placed in an outlet.
Besides if a GFI trips what is the first place you're going to look;
especially if you don't know it's protected by GFI. My bathroom GFI
also protects the outside outlets: I hope I can remember that if it
trips!
-JFK-
|
4.405 | Why? | LENNON::GILLIGAN | Spaceman Spiff to the rescue | Wed Feb 14 1990 12:22 | 6 |
| Did they really have to put down the tile with the paw print in
it?
brian
|
4.406 | Not in my house... | SMURF::PINARD | | Wed Feb 14 1990 13:41 | 10 |
| I saw that episode last night... re. -1, I said the same thing,
why the hell did they install the one with the paw print!! What
a joke, rustic is one thing, but this is rediculous. It would
be like throwing a drop light in a bucket of water to demo a GFI... ;^)
I read it here and then saw it last night, that was bad too!!
And did they have to use the old boards with the Major ant holes
in it. Probably because that's all the wood they had left actually...
Jean
|
4.407 | Overall length of wiring is a factor. | BANZAI::FISHER | Dictionary is not. | Wed Feb 14 1990 14:02 | 6 |
| I think a GFI with 250 ft of wiring will leak enough current to trip.
I think the total length of all the wire on the circuit to my bathroom
outlet is near that length. That's a sufficient reason for using a GFI
outlet.
ed
|
4.408 | I like GFI in the outlet, but tastes may vary | HPSTEK::BELANGER | Scurvy sea dog | Wed Feb 14 1990 15:54 | 7 |
|
I favor the GFI in the outlet. I have bathrooms on the 1st and 2nd
floors of my house. If the GFI trips in the 2nd floor bathroom, I
don't wanna go down 2 floors to reset the %$#@^& thing! The regular
circuit breaker is a different story, at least for me...
Fred
|
4.409 | ... and about that old wood... | KACIE::HENKEL | | Wed Feb 14 1990 16:22 | 9 |
| re a couple back:
I wondered about using the old, semi-eaten wood too. They knew this
wood came from an infested structure but apparently didn't spray it or
anything. I noted the "survivor" comment as they were building the
doors -- but I couldn't really see whether the "survivor" in question
was a carpenter ant or just a fairly healthy spider. In any case, I
wonder whether there will be any surprises when spring comes and things
start to hatch?
|
4.410 | no basement for me.... | CANYON::LEEDS | Scuba dooba doo | Wed Feb 14 1990 18:56 | 8 |
| I might also add that here in Phoenix, 99.999% of houses do NOT have
basements. The breaker box is outside adjacent to the meter. If my GFI
trips, I'd much rather push a button on the receptacle in the
bathtroom then have to tromp outside in my bathrobe to reset the
circuit. Besides, if it's 115 degrees outside, that breaker box is
awful hot to touch......
|
4.411 | why are GFI breakers so expensive? | VIA::GLANTZ | Mike, DTN 381-1253 | Wed Feb 14 1990 19:41 | 10 |
| As long as we're on the subject of GFI breakers vs. receptacles, my
$.02 is that I prefer breakers because they protect everything on the
circuit without having to figure out which is the first box on the
circuit. BUT if you need only one receptacle protected, or if you know
which is the first box (pretty easy to find out), it's much cheaper to
plop down the approx $10 it cost for a GFI receptacle than the minimum
of about $40 for a breaker. At least that's the prices I've hit around
here (Spag's). Anyone know why the big difference? Is it plain old
supply/demand? Or does it really cost so much more to make the GFI
breaker?
|
4.412 | rathole alert | KACIE::HENKEL | | Thu Feb 15 1990 11:51 | 2 |
| Before we get too off the track here, be advised there is a huge GFI
discussion already in this conference.
|
4.413 | Time for a new name | WONDER::MAHEU | | Thu Feb 15 1990 13:55 | 6 |
|
...rumor has it that they're changing the name of the show to
this Old Sub-Contractor.
gm
|
4.414 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Thu Feb 15 1990 16:19 | 20 |
| How will dropping the trouble light in a plastic bucket of water
trip the GFCI? Where would the leakage current go?
(Did the trouble light have a grounded plug and outlet?
I guess there might have been enough leakage through the water to cause
a ground fault that way.)
(and it took the better part of a second, maybe more than a second, to trip -
that doesn't generate high confidence to me that it was a ground fault trip)
Had I been watching with the sound turned down, I would have assumed that
the hot bulb shattered in the cold water and the filament got broken
when the water got to it, thus dousing the light.
If he'd pulled it out, reset the breaker, and showed that the light
still worked, I'd have been more impressed.
Do you suppose that the breaker really tripped on the ground fault?
...and without resorting to the GFCI topic, does the breaker indicate
that it tripped on a ground fault as opposed to an overload?
- tom]
|
4.415 | Drop light outlet, tripped it. | SMURF::PINARD | | Thu Feb 15 1990 16:47 | 8 |
| r .347
I was watching as he put it in bucket, it didn't trip untill he
got the outlet part of the drop light in the water...
I'm sure it triped from the GFI difference between neutral and
hot. The ground lug has nothing to do with the GFI part.
Jean
|
4.416 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | How do you get this car out of second gear? | Thu Feb 15 1990 16:55 | 19 |
| re .348:
> I was watching as he put it in bucket, it didn't trip untill he
> got the outlet part of the drop light in the water...
> I'm sure it triped from the GFI difference between neutral and
> hot. The ground lug has nothing to do with the GFI part.
Sure it does. As long as only the hot and neutral are the only parts in the
water, and there is no other ground path (the plastic bucket takes care of this)
the GFI should not trip, since there is no current inbalance.
But once the ground conductor got involved (or some other ground was provided)
there is a current from hot to ground, causing a difference in the hot and
neutral currents. The GFI will detect this, and it will trip.
If you were trying to say the GFI doesn't try to look for current through
the ground conductor of a circuit, you're right, of course.
-Mike
|
4.417 | .349 is right... | SMURF::PINARD | | Thu Feb 15 1990 17:00 | 8 |
| R. 349
Your absolutely right, In the case of the light it was as you said
the difference across the neutral and hot was caused by the ground
in this case... and what you said is what I meant...
Thanks
Jean
|
4.418 | Sorry, no indication here. | SHRFAC::BOUDREAU | | Fri Feb 16 1990 04:08 | 6 |
| RE 347
A GFCI Breaker does not indicate what caused it to trip.
This is one of the advantages of using the receptacles.
CB
|
4.419 | Let's `lighten up' on This Old House | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Fri Feb 16 1990 13:39 | 19 |
| I saw the light-in-the-bucket trick, and I don't think anyone should
criticize the electrician for doing it.
First, this wasn't presented as a way to TEST the GFI, just as an
illustration of a GFI in action.
Second, most people don't believe things unless they see them.
Even this conference contains people who say "I don't think safety
rule X should exist, because I've never had any problems" -- and we
are, I think, on the whole better educated than the general public.
So it's reasonable to indulge in a bit of dramatics to show what happens
if you are in a bathtub and something live falls in with you ... zap!
And finally, the way the electrician did it, I got the impression that he
was under orders -- that it wasn't HIS idea to do anything so dumb as to
drop a work light into a bucket of water!
Enjoy,
Larry
|
4.420 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Fri Feb 16 1990 15:04 | 26 |
| > I saw the light-in-the-bucket trick, and I don't think anyone should
> criticize the electrician for doing it.
> ...
> And finally, the way the electrician did it, I got the impression that he
> was under orders -- that it wasn't HIS idea to do anything so dumb as to
> drop a work light into a bucket of water!
I disagree that we ought not criticize them for it, but I will concede
that pointing fun (or worse) here isn't very effective.
The demonstration just wasn't meaningful, and was, in a sense, deceptive.
If they'd dropped a radio or a hair dryer in the bucket, the appliance might
have failed, or the breaker might have tripped because of a resulting short
circuit, BUT THE GFCI WOULD NOT HAVE TRIPPED! That type of appliance
is typically not grounded, so there would be no extraneous ground path
(in an isolated, insulated bucket) to cause a current imbalance.
As to whether it was the electrician's idea, so what? If the show's
producers thought up the need for a trick, he could have told them
(maybe he did) that the trick was not realistic.
This all brings to mind another non-TOH question.
Do modern sinks and tubs provide a dangerous ground path anymore?
Given plastic waste lines and plastic parts in stops and faucets,
is there a clear ground continuity in plumbing the way there used to be?
- tom]
|
4.421 | This is definately a rathole! | VMSDEV::ILONA::BLASER | Peter Blaser 381-2630 ZKO3-4/W23 | Mon Feb 19 1990 13:22 | 28 |
| > If they'd dropped a radio or a hair dryer in the bucket, the appliance might
> have failed, or the breaker might have tripped because of a resulting short
> circuit, BUT THE GFCI WOULD NOT HAVE TRIPPED! That type of appliance
> is typically not grounded, so there would be no extraneous ground path
> (in an isolated, insulated bucket) to cause a current imbalance.
I wouldn't bet my life on the ability of that bucket to insulate from the
ground. It probably would have tripped due to ground fault anyway...
> Do modern sinks and tubs provide a dangerous ground path anymore?
> Given plastic waste lines and plastic parts in stops and faucets,
> is there a clear ground continuity in plumbing the way there used to be?
In Litchfield NH, code still requires cast iron or copper pipes. This may be
true in other cities and towns. Not to mention the large number of homes which
are older and were built using metal pipes.
The amount of current required to harm someone immersed in water is so small,
that all plastic pieces would not save you. Two possible senarios:
1. Tub is draining, cord falls into tub, water is the conductor to the septic
tank or sewer system ground.
2. The shower curtain, covered with water from condensation dangles into the tub
and provides a path to the metal shower rod which is connected to the wall.
Wood provides a path to ground.
Electricity can be very cleaver about finding ways to ground.
|
4.422 | price/performance | NYEM1::MILBERG | Barry Milberg | Mon Feb 19 1990 22:22 | 13 |
| re. earlier reply on cost of GFCI breaker vs. outlets
I'm doing the basement and putting in 3 separate strings of outlet-
main family room
office/ham-shack
darkroom-1/2bath
Breaker GFCI's were $45 each (Home Depot) outlet GFCI's were $10. The
$100 savings has important in this day of stretched out raises!
-Barry-
|
4.423 | buy at elec. supply places | ENGINE::PAULHUS | Chris @ MLO6B-2/T13 dtn 223-6871 | Tue Feb 20 1990 13:09 | 6 |
| re. last: I've been buying GFI breakers for my addition and have found
that: Square D is very expensive - so much so that I've gone to
Crouse-Hinds (sp?) boxes. The prices for breakers, boxes, etc are
much lower at electrical supply outfits. My price (no special
discount) is closer to $30 (?) for GFI breakers, $35 for 240V GFI. My
dad picked up some GFI outlets on sale at $8 each. - Chris
|
4.424 | Why I went with GFI breakers | SEESAW::PILANT | L. Mark Pilant, VMS Security | Tue Feb 20 1990 15:15 | 8 |
| When I changed my service entry panel from a 16 circuit fuse panel to a 36
circuit breaker panel, i opted for GFI breakers. It was more expensive (since
I had to put in about 10 of them) but was much easier than spending lots of
time to try and figure out a wiring diagram for the house. In other words,
I didn't have to be concerned whether or not the outlet being replaces was the
first one on a particular circuit.
- Mark
|
4.425 | Wow, 10 seems excessive | WILKIE::THOMS | digital index operator | Tue Feb 20 1990 15:37 | 6 |
| >< Note 1974.357 by SEESAW::PILANT "L. Mark Pilant, VMS Security" >
> -< Why I went with GFI breakers >-
Mark, just out of curiosity, why did you have to put in 10 GFI breakers?
Ross
|
4.426 | Bob's Back! | WONDER::MAHEU | | Wed Feb 21 1990 13:07 | 53 |
|
Here's something you may all get a laugh from.
Gary
RECOPIED WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM: Woodshop News - March Edition
Former "This Old House" host Bob Vila will host a new home improv-
ment and remodeling program to be produced by Vila in conjunction
with Sear's, Roebuck & Co. of Chicago
Titled "Home Again With Bob Vila," the nationally syndicated tele-
vision program will air sometime in 1990.
The program is geared to a younger, less-upscale audience than "This
Old House," the Emmy Award-winning show Vila hosted for the Public
Broadcasting Service (PBS). Vila left "This Old House" earlier this
year due to conflicts arising from his commercial endorsements.
"The tone of the new show is different because it is more for the
do-it-yourselfer types who can't afford to hire a master carpenter,"
said Colleen Logan, account supervisor for Ogilvy & Mather Public
Relations of Chicago, Sear's advertising and public relations agency,
which is syndicating the program.
In the "This Old House" format, Vila worked with master carpenter
Norm Abram on renovating and remodeling projects. In the new show,
Vila will be his own.
"It's a whole new slant," said Steve Nance of the public relations
department at Sears. "The target is more middle America - people whose
homes are in the $150,000-and-under price range."
The program is expected to feature affordable repairs and renovations
and remodeling jobs, visits to home improvement stores for supplies,
explanation of how to budget for home improvements, and interviews with
home improvement tradesmen and people who sell home improvement mater-
ials.
There will be 39 original shows in the first series of half-hour
programs.
The first 13 shows will focus on the construction of a Cape Cod-
style home and the renovation of an old shack to a family room as an
addition to a home. Filming began Nov. 13 on Cape Cod MA.
The next 13 programs will concentrate on the renovation of a town-
house in Chicago. The topic of the last 13 shows in the series will
be announced.
Vila is the exclusive spokesman for Sears' Craftsman Home and Yard
Centers, where Sears' line of Craftsman tools and equipment is sold.
He will appear in TV, newspaper, magazine and direct-mail advertising,
on in-store videos and at store autograph signings on behalf of Sears.
Vila recently founded B.V.T.V., a production company currently under
contract with Sears to produce, "Home Again With Bob Vila." Vila has
been a commercial spokesman for Time-Life Home Repair Books, American
Electric Power, Newell Home Furnishings, American Home Products, and
now, Sears.
He has his own remodeling and design business and continues to work
on residential and commercial properties in MA.
|
4.427 | | TALLIS::KOCH | Kevin Koch LTN1-2/H09 DTN226-6274 | Wed Feb 21 1990 13:19 | 12 |
| > "It's a whole new slant," said Steve Nance of the public relations
> department at Sears. "The target is more middle America - people whose
> homes are in the $150,000-and-under price range."
> The program is expected to feature affordable repairs and renovations
> and remodeling jobs, visits to home improvement stores for supplies,
> explanation of how to budget for home improvements, and interviews with
> home improvement tradesmen and people who sell home improvement mater-
> ials.
Actually, its back to the original idea of TOH [thank god, finally!],
that was lost years ago. Now if only Click and Clack can get back on
track, too.
|
4.428 | Are we having fun yet ... | SEESAW::PILANT | L. Mark Pilant, VMS Security | Thu Feb 22 1990 02:57 | 20 |
| RE: .358
Well, let me see if I can remember where all of them went...There were:
2 circuits in the garage (1 original, 1 new)
3 circuits in the kitchen (all original)
1 downstairs bathroom
1 upstairs bathroom
1 basement
2 family room (both new, because of the spa)
I think that's all of them.
BTW, because I was upgrading the service entry, I had to bring it up to code.
In addition to all the GFI breakers, I had to add a ground rod & line (the
original was through the neutral to the pole on our side of the street, across
to teh pole on the pther side of the street, adn then down the guy wire; not
my idea of a good ground).
- Mark
|
4.429 | Good idea but not required in most cases | EDITOR::MCCARTHY | Thats only 2000 miles a month. | Thu Feb 22 1990 09:05 | 15 |
| re .361
>>BTW, because I was upgrading the service entry, I had to bring it up to code.
Who told you this? I am not saying that it was not a good idea to do
this but I do not this that it is required when a service change is
done that the ENTIRE house be brought up to code. This would put the
cost of a service change out of the reach of most anyone. In general
when I have done work with electricians in the past, we only bring up
to code which ever circuts we touch (unless we see a grave problem).
With many older houses, bathrooms are not on seperate circuts and you
do not want to GFI half of a house.
The ground rod change is a required upgrade because it is required as part
of the service.
|
4.430 | Gentle reminders... | OASS::RAMSEY_B | Put the wet stuff on the red stuff | Thu Feb 22 1990 13:38 | 4 |
| Please continue any discussion about electrical upgrade, GFIC
working/not working, etc to the appropiate notes. Let's try and keep
the discussion about TOH.
|
4.431 | | DUGGAN::CANELLA | Maggie's Boy Toy | Thu Feb 22 1990 15:20 | 15 |
| That's right, don't pollute the innuendo with actual facts.....
Re Bob Vila
Well, it does seem as if he finally figured out that shelling out 400
clams for a toilet that sings songs to you while on the can is not
everyone's idea of bathroom remodeling.
Either way, "Home Time" is probably going to be a much better show
judging from what I've seen of it and what Bob has traditionally
peddled. In "Home Time", they show you how to do it and in not too
technical terms. Besides, Joanne Liebeler is the perky babe that Bob
Vila can never be, especially with all that facial hair that he sports.
Alfonso
|
4.432 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Feb 22 1990 17:18 | 3 |
| Since Sears is going to be his sponsor, he's *gotta* downgrade his
ambitions. Do people who spend a few hundred grand remodeling shop
at Sears?
|
4.433 | It's in the eyes of the beholder, I guess | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Thu Feb 22 1990 20:00 | 11 |
|
.364> In "Home Time", they show you how to do it and in not too
.364> technical terms. Besides, Joanne Liebeler is the perky babe
.364> that Bob Vila can never be, especially with all that facial
.364> hair that he sports.
She doesn't do a thing for me! Well, for that matter, neither does
Bob :-).
-tm
|
4.434 | | NRADM::KING | FUR...the look that KILLS... | Fri Feb 23 1990 08:35 | 6 |
| TOH has finished the <"barn" in Concord now its off to Santa fewith
another project. I was not too impressed with the job in Concord.
Its nothing I would ever do or want to try. I like Hometime better
because they do stuff I try to do around the house.
REK
|
4.435 | But what did it cost? | EDITOR::MCCARTHY | Thats only 2000 miles a month. | Fri Feb 23 1990 09:07 | 13 |
| Ya the barn is done. I though it was really funny when they went to
visit a "built from scratch" timber frame. Hell, what did they start
with in Concord? Sure there was a foundation but that was it, they had
the limitation that it had to look like a barn but it was not like
there was an existing structure that they were adding to.
I was also waiting for the cost rundown. Oh well.
I did notice the bed frame in one of the bedrooms that was "made by a
local craftsman" looked ALOT like what the New Yankee Workshop is going
to be making this week. Norm gets money BOTH ways!
bjm
|
4.436 | well if they did it on TOH, it must work! | ARCHER::FOX | | Fri Feb 23 1990 11:10 | 9 |
| Yes, the last episode was a bit of a disappointment. I was really
looking forward to a cost rundown. They could spent a little more
time on the mechanicals too.
One thing I was impressed with was the fact they installed a
heating "system" for driveway, driven off the same boiler no
less! (Hmmm, where was that discussion saying heated driveways
didn't work? :-))
John
|
4.437 | Fun reading in TV Guide with Bob and Tom | CARTUN::VHAMBURGER | Woodcarvers are sharp people! | Fri Feb 23 1990 12:02 | 30 |
|
> Since Sears is going to be his sponsor, he's *gotta* downgrade his
> ambitions. Do people who spend a few hundred grand remodeling shop
> at Sears?
If you don't read TV Guide regularly, this is the week to buy a copy.
They have an article about TOH and the producer's reasoning for doing
things the way they do. He freely admits that the Wickwire's got about
$150K worth of freebies in a rather palacial estate as part of their deal.
In the same breath, he talks about "Plugging" the donators and
donations.....Sounds a *LOT* like advertising to me, but they don't price
it by the minute and they don't pay taxes on it! They also mention that the
average home in Concord goes for $750K....anyone care to defend that
figure? I doubt it somehow, maybe 350-450K for a new single family with all
the toys and gimmicks.....
A sidebar to the article shows us Bob Vilas smiling face, with beard,
flannel shirt and jeans.....Talks about how Bob's first show is a remodel
of a small cape on the Cape. Definately a downscale project. Vila
talks about getting back to basics with remodeling so maybe he was not
happy with the direction the show (TOH) was taking with the massive budgets
and overruns. Sounded a bit like Vila was not unhappy to leave, knowing
that he would/could get another show going, doing what he liked.
>>>>RE: The pencil post bed looking suspiciously like Norms latest coming
project..... At least they didn't describe it as made by a local master
carpenter!
Vic
|
4.438 | Are the donations taxable income? | CARTUN::VHAMBURGER | Woodcarvers are sharp people! | Fri Feb 23 1990 12:07 | 14 |
|
Speaking of Freebies to the Wickwires and donations by the companies..
What is the tax implication to the Wickwires for all this? Certainly
they pay property taxes on the full value of the house as set by the
assessors, but what about the freebies? They are going to PBS, but put into
the home of the Wickwires? I would think the IRS would consider this along
the lines of taxable gifts for this past year, about $150K worth! Maybe
$40-50K in taxes due on it? Anyone up on their tax law on this question?
They might have been under or at their $250K budget, but the extra taxes
this year might just finish them off!
Vic
|
4.439 | I think it is taxable | WESTVW::LEE | I eat AASTs for breakfast | Fri Feb 23 1990 12:35 | 4 |
| I'll check with my tax buddy, but I think that they will get
a hefty bill. I would expect all of those companies that gave
"gifts" to the Wickwires will be sending them (and the IRS) some
1099-something-or-another.
|
4.440 | Concord Home Price | OAXCEL::KAUFMANN | Bo knows diapers | Fri Feb 23 1990 14:08 | 12 |
| RE: .370
>>They also mention that the
>>average home in Concord goes for $750K....anyone care to defend that
>>figure? I doubt it somehow, maybe 350-450K for a new single family with all
>>the toys and gimmicks.....
My local paper recently compared the average home prices in the
surrounding area, and Concord's average home price is $408,000,
far from the TV Guide quote, but still outrageous.
Bo
|
4.441 | the barn is done | WMOIS::L_WATERMAN | | Fri Feb 23 1990 15:36 | 14 |
|
Well, I was anxious to see the final results of the project. But
the railings that were put up looked like they belong in a prison or
some kind of institution. I was expecting some kind of wooden railing
given all the post and beams.
Also, the women who gave the "grand tour" at the end, was the same
person who did the Weatherbee Farm (and we all know that thos people
ending up selling because they couldn't afford it after all the cost
over run). I suppose that we will be seeing the final results in
a future copy of "Country Living". I did like most of the furnishing.
On to a new project in Santa Fe (sp)
Happy viewing, Linda
|
4.442 | Fun with statistics | WJOUSM::MARCHETTI | Mama said there'd be days like this. | Fri Feb 23 1990 18:42 | 26 |
| Re .370, .373
>>They also mention that the
>>average home in Concord goes for $750K....anyone care to defend that
>>figure? I doubt it somehow, maybe 350-450K for a new single family with all
>>the toys and gimmicks.....
> My local paper recently compared the average home prices in the
> surrounding area, and Concord's average home price is $408,000,
> far from the TV Guide quote, but still outrageous.
Actually, both the $750K figure and the $408K figure are "correct".
New homes in Concord are typically 4000-8000 sq. ft and sell for $600K
to over $1 million. The land is so expensive (my 20,000 sq ft is
assessed for $145K!) that nobody builds normal housing on it, only
these incredible palaces. Which, BTW, are not selling real well these
days. My contractor/neighbor calls them "lumberyards in the sky",
referring to their liklihood of spontaneously combusting some night.
8-)
The $408K figure includes the sales of existing, more modest homes.
The average assessed value for a home in Concord is about $330K.
Sorry Vic, but $350-400K won't buy a new house with all the toys and
gimmicks anymore.
Bob
|
4.443 | land/house ratio? | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Mon Feb 26 1990 18:50 | 7 |
| The last note got me wondering, isn't there a recommended ratio between
the price of the land and the price of the house. Does anyone know what
the ratio is, and why?
thanks,
Mark
|
4.444 | back to the barn... | SMURF::DIBBLE | D&H Travel Agent | Tue Feb 27 1990 01:08 | 10 |
| Did anyone besides me dislike the stainless steel kitchen they
put in? Stainless fridge, stainless dishwasher, stainless something
else (memory fades). And in the middle of this Hi-tech wonder,
a wooden top on the island in the middle.
I didn't get to see the final episode to see what the decorator did,
but in my estimation the Wickwires seem to be standard "TWITS", with
most of their taste in their mouths. (if you get my drift)
bld
|
4.445 | IMHO | BANZAI::FISHER | Dictionary is not. | Tue Feb 27 1990 11:22 | 33 |
| re:.376. This is my opinion, someone in Real Estate might be able to
give a much better opinion.
The general assumption is that you do not want to have a house that is
worth lots more than your neighbor's houses because the neighborhood's
houses will have an adverse effect on your house's value. It might be
nice to have the cheapest house in the neighborhood because the area
will tend to drag up you houses value, but your neighbor's won't like
that a lot because your house will have an adverse effect on theirs.
It works like this. If lots are going for $10,000, then they are
within the means of a certain socio-economic strata. If $10K lots are
about the cheapest lots around that are buildable that makes them the
kind of place that people are going to buy for a first home or a
starter home and those people will, in general be "fully extended"
to buy and build a home in that neighborhood. Therefore the house
built in the area will tend to be starters or starters plus a little.
As the neighborhood matures, the residents will add a few things to
their houses and the values will be boosted a little. Some of the
residents will upgrade by moving some by adding on.
As to what is an effective ratio, I don't know but from these
conclusions (if you believe them) it follows that you just cannot move
into an upscale neighborhood ($200K lots) and put in a trailer or have a
prefab house brought in. The neighbors just won't let you and will try
to have zoning rules establishing minimum limits.
I think it's really odd when I bike throught the back roads and see a
few trailers, a few farmhouses and an occasional palacial estate all on
the same road. I can see how "someone" might just want to buy out his
neighbor.
ed
|
4.446 | New Homes do increase property values | SWAM2::JACOMB_SC | | Tue Feb 27 1990 18:24 | 11 |
| I agree that by building more expensive homes, the value of the whole
neighbohood or town goes up. 5 years ago we bought a 4 br 2 ba 1500 sq.
foot 20 year old house for $110K in a canyon area. within 2 years
developers started building new homes on the hills surrounding us. These
"executive homes" are 2500 sq. feet and up and start at $400K. Needless
to say, the value of our homes went up greatly. Houses exactly like
ours are now selling for $200K - $240K 8^) And most houses are sold
within 1 month. Realtors are constantly asking us if we want to list
our house. The funny thing is that most of the "executive homes" are
also selling well (go figure?). Oh well only in sunny Southern Calif.
|
4.447 | That Old House for Sale | GIAMEM::RIDGE | | Wed Feb 28 1990 13:42 | 3 |
| The Weatherby (sp) house is up for sale. I don't know what the asking
price is. Next time I go by I'll have to catch the realtor's name and
give them a call.
|
4.448 | | ALLVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Wed Feb 28 1990 14:29 | 12 |
|
re .374
I agree with you, but I'm a little harsher; "Those rails looked
like sh*t!!!!!!!". The rails were nice, but they didn't go with
that house. The contrast of all that beautiful woodwork then to
put on that steel rail. The one off the balcony didn't look to bad.
I think because it was brown and blended in with the deck. I know
the cost of a nice wood rail would have been outragous, but I think
it would have been worth it.
Mike
|
4.449 | Stainless Steel Appliances? | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Wed Feb 28 1990 18:13 | 6 |
|
Yuck!
Maybe for a range-top, but not for an oven, dishwasher or
refridgerator! Sounds like an restaurant kitchen.
|
4.450 | it's the latest | VIA::GLANTZ | Mike, DTN 381-1253 | Wed Feb 28 1990 18:29 | 7 |
| Re stainless=ugly, 'pends what you like. THE LOOK in upscale kitchens
these days is custom unstained cherry cabinets (or, better yet, no
cabinets at all, but antique hutches, walnut or olivewood tables, etc
-- Corian is definitely non-chic), and all stainless commercial-
looking appliances (Vulcan, Viking, SubZero, Traulsen, Hobart, etc).
Talk about mucho dineros. My wife drools at the sight of kitchens like
that. I admit to being a bit envious, myself.
|
4.451 | Probably better info in TALLIS::REAL_ESTATE | VMSSPT::NICHOLS | Herb -CSSE support for VMS at ZK | Wed Feb 28 1990 19:34 | 10 |
| re ratio between land and home values.
My impression is that it wants to 3ta4 to 1 in favor of building.
That's one of the reasons why the cost of new homes is so outrageous!
When you start out with a piece of land worth $125,000 to $150,000 it
is necessary to build a 'fairly' substantial home to maintain that
ration. Our home is 35 years old and assessed at $200,000 of which
approx $125,000 is land.
I think this is probably typical of older homes in Acton (where we
live) and Concord etc.
|
4.452 | probably better info in TALLIS::REAL_ESTATE | VMSSPT::NICHOLS | Herb -CSSE support for VMS at ZK | Wed Feb 28 1990 19:37 | 12 |
| re ratio between land and home values.
My impression is that it wants to be about 3ta4 to 1 in favor of the
building. That's one of the reasons why the cost of new homes is so
outrageous!
When you start out with a piece of land worth (excuse me, that costs)
$125,000 to $150,000 it is necessary to build a 'fairly' substantial
home to maintain that ratio.
Our home is 35 years old and assessed at $200,000 of which approx
$125,000 is land.
I think this is probably typical of older homes in Acton (where we
live) and Concord etc.
|
4.453 | RE:.377 Third Try... | MVDS02::LOCKRIDGE | Artificial Insanity | Thu Mar 01 1990 00:31 | 26 |
| re: .377
> I didn't get to see the final episode to see what the decorator did,
> but in my estimation the Wickwires seem to be standard "TWITS", with
> most of their taste in their mouths. (if you get my drift)
> bld
I'll try to enter this again - did this a couple of days ago but the
system bombed out. [Also again today!]
Not knowing the Wickwires, I don't know if this is true or not, but I
did see the final episode. I got the impression that the "decorator"
made ALL the decisions as to the appointments, some of which were UGLY
(like the funeral drape). Sounded like the Wickwires weren't consulted
at all.
But, look at it this way. If YOU were given $125,000+ worth of
"stuff", how much would you complain?
re: several The railing were *very* nice, but looked like they
belonged in a Museum of modern art, not that barn (same with the
commercial kitchen)!
-Bob
|
4.454 | But what happens when "in" is "out"? | BCSE::YANKES | | Thu Mar 01 1990 20:28 | 12 |
|
Re: .38 THE LOOK in upscale kitchens
I don't like anything that is expensive enough to be considered
permanent to be based off of what is "in" today. Ten years from now, we might
look back on these "in" kitchens with dismay that anyone would even think of
living with it, let alone spend big bucks to put them in. This isn't exactly
like buying the latest "in" tie or brand of running shoe!
I'm a non-chic kind of guy, I guess.
-craig
|
4.455 | | SMURF::DIBBLE | D&H Travel Agent | Fri Mar 02 1990 01:37 | 8 |
| re: stainless being in...
I'm perfectly in favor of 'in' things. But I think the combination of
the wood island-top and the stainless all over the kitchen really
looked out-of-place. They either should have had more wood elsewhere,
or used the same counter-top they used on the counters.
|
4.456 | Looks like another sleeper | EDITOR::MCCARTHY | Thats only 2000 miles a month. | Fri Mar 02 1990 10:41 | 12 |
| Well it looks like I will be watching this "project" only if there is
nothing better on. It was alot better when the show was local and work
on more down to earth projects (as said several times before). Looks
like they have a good deal of work to do.
Steve is getting to me, the intro was a bit much, sounds like the
post and beam designer rubbed off on him.
Does anyone know if this project is going to take as long as the "barn"
did?
bjm
|
4.457 | Here's adobe in your eye! | CARTUN::VHAMBURGER | Woodcarvers are sharp people! | Fri Mar 02 1990 11:07 | 20 |
|
Santa Fe, N.M.........home of the adobe house, labor intensive Mexican
tile (Read that, they can't afford to do it in this country...) and of
course, historical Mexican architectural pieces stripped from where-ever
and bought by the gringos with money......
Sorry to sound biased, but I thought it was out of style to strip
struggling countries of there cultural artifacts for your personal
enjoyment and use. Every time these guys turned around they had another
Mexican piece staring them in the face. I wonder why they don't spend their
dollars on having a good Mexican artist reproduce some of these carved
doors and help the Mexican economy while not removing Mexicos heritage at
the same time....Of course, the answer is obvious, TOH can't get the
Mexican artist to donate the work... ;^}
This looks like another show of "get it donated or raise your budget".
Even Rich Tretheway (sp?) is into the donate or die act now......
Vic H
|
4.458 | Am I a budding cow-boy? | SMURF::KEGEL | andy kegel DTN 381-0428 ZK03 | Fri Mar 02 1990 11:29 | 23 |
| Re: .-1
> It was alot better when the show was local and work
> on more down to earth projects (as said several times before).
I guess "local" depends on where you're standing? When I was living in Chicago,
I was bored by the endless stream of Colonial, Cape Cod, and barn
reconstructions. How I longed to see TOH work on a "local" Illinois farmhouse
or a Victorian "lady" with a wrap-around porch. Or maybe even a Chicago
townhouse (vaguely equivalent to a New York brownstone). As Paul Simon might
have said, "One renter's ceiling is another renter's floor."
Re: the Santa Fe job
I guess I have some latent cow-boy genes, 'cause I think the adobe construction
will be interesting. And you must admit that they are getting more honest about
the prices. With a budget of "only $100,000," the heating-and-cooling guy is
already talking about donations. If only I had those kind of problems...
(Please, sir, could you donate a Cray to a poor, starving computer person with
a terrible addiction for speed and a PC budget?)
-andy kegel@krisis
|
4.459 | Who selects these people? | KACIE::HENKEL | | Fri Mar 02 1990 11:43 | 9 |
| re last few
One other thing that I find a bit annoying about the current round of
TOH programs is the type of homeowners being selected. These people
(not to mention the Wickwires) sure appear as though they could find
the cash to fund this whole project without all the donated material.
Maybe they should rename the show: "yuppies get a free ride"
|
4.460 | | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Fri Mar 02 1990 11:55 | 4 |
| The TOH business card next to the religious statue in the niche was an
interesting touch though.
Eric
|
4.461 | | WILKIE::THOMS | digital index operator | Fri Mar 02 1990 12:20 | 5 |
| I know taste in home design is subjective, but... those
adobe Santa Fe homes look like recycled Citgo gas stations.
Ross
|
4.462 | What's this conference coming to? TOH? | EPOCH::JOHNSON | Never assume anything. | Fri Mar 02 1990 13:03 | 7 |
| I agree ... it must be like living in something half-way between a sandcastle
and a bomb shelter, but we all have opinions.
What surprises me is to hear people sensible enough (I thought) to be involved
in a DIY conference talking about what is 'in' and what isn't 'in'. Caring
about fluffy crap like that would seem to be diametrically (sp?) opposite to
the DIY spirit.
|
4.463 | Digression from TOH | OASS::RAMSEY_B | Put the wet stuff on the red stuff | Fri Mar 02 1990 13:25 | 21 |
| .re -1
Because I know which end of the hammer is the business end doesn't
necessarily mean that I don't care what my surroundings look like. I
work on my house because I like to and it saves me from having to pay
$30 an hour to a laborer.
The fluffy crap like what is "in" and what is "out" makes a big
difference in determining what wallpaper I hang so that I can sell this
house. What color to paint the house to appeal to the largest market.
Sure I know what I like but I also care what the market is wanting so
that when I unload this mortorage payment for another, it is on the
market for the shortest amount of time and returns the highest dollar.
We are remodeling our kitchen right now and since we plan to sell
within 1 years time, whats "in" and whats "out" and what will least
offend most buyers is playing a large part in our selection of colors,
materials, and cost payed/returned.
Sorry I digress. Let's return this note to TOH and move the discussion
about Fluff to SOAPBOX or offline to mail.
|
4.464 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Fri Mar 02 1990 18:44 | 13 |
| > One other thing that I find a bit annoying about the current round of
> TOH programs is the type of homeowners being selected. These people
> (not to mention the Wickwires) sure appear as though they could find
> the cash to fund this whole project without all the donated material.
> Maybe they should rename the show: "yuppies get a free ride"
Do you suppose that this type of homeowner is being selected
because they are the type of people who are supporting public TC
and TOH with thier $$$s? Remember that public TV has to be
entertaining, not just educational, to survive. I'd bet that the
public in general likes the sort of glossy overview of fancy stuff
more than they like the sort of nuts and bolts details that
tend to interest many of the readers of this file.
|
4.465 | Furniture donated, too? | CIMNET::MIKELIS | Just browsing through time... | Mon Mar 05 1990 12:15 | 4 |
| Is the furniture and such that the finished house is usually furnished with
by TOH's interior designer, donated also?
-jim
|
4.466 | | ALLVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Mon Mar 05 1990 14:29 | 10 |
|
There was an article about TOH in the NH Union Leader several years
ago. According to the article in order to qualify, you must first
show that you can afford the construction/reconstruction, because
they don't gurantee that anything will be donated. This obviously
isn't the case with the Wickwires because they said up front that
their budget was $150k and the cost of that house/barn went way
beyond that.
Mike
|
4.467 | $100,000 for plumbing! | SONATA::HICKOX | Stow Vice | Mon Mar 05 1990 15:40 | 9 |
|
RE: Santa Fe - The look on Richard's face was priceless when he
found out the $100,000 wasn't his budget, it was
the total budget!
This one's going to be interesting, but it looks as
though the show is really going downhill now.
Mark
|
4.468 | | VMSSPT::NICHOLS | Herb -CSSE support for VMS at ZK | Mon Mar 05 1990 19:24 | 2 |
| Trethewy was kidding.
|
4.469 | | PSTJTT::TABER | Opposites impact | Tue Mar 06 1990 10:23 | 3 |
| The decorator doesn't donate material. She takes away whatever she brought
when the photo session is over.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
4.470 | Isn't Mud cheap | DECLNE::WATKINS | Elvis is living in Peoria | Tue Mar 06 1990 16:20 | 3 |
| They also didn't spend much time discussing the differences in cost and
construction methods between Mass and New Mexico. The $100K budget may
be (probable will) more all inclusive in New Mexico.
|
4.471 | | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | | Fri Mar 30 1990 17:53 | 4 |
| Steve Thomas will be at the Pheasant Lane Mall this weekend.
Not sure what times.
George
|
4.472 | This Old Mall | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Sun Apr 01 1990 01:16 | 3 |
| Doing research, no doubt. My proposal for their next effort is to
refurb an entire Mall, much like what was done at the Burlington Mall a
couple of years back.
|
4.473 | This Old Whore House | EVETPU::MCCARTHY | Coming to you from Pink Flamingo Land | Wed Jun 13 1990 23:17 | 13 |
| I just watched a good spoof of This Old House. It was on MTV's tonight
at 7 PM on their comedy show.
It started out with "This Old Whore House", where "Bob" and "Norm" walk
around trying to make the place "More private" (aka no great space in
this place). They then go to Mario Joiner's apartment (he is the host
of the show) and started to make some changes. Mario's says to Bob:
"Hey what are you doing here? Weren't you fired for doing those
Time/Life commericials?"
The actor playing Norm had a pillow in his shirt and the Bob actor had
a beard and hunting vest on.
|
4.474 | | DECWIN::KMCDONOUGH | Set Kids/Nosick | Thu Aug 02 1990 15:06 | 8 |
|
A friend of mine lives next door to Norm. When I went to visit the
friend last night, I saw Norm out there cutting his grass, just like a
regular guy. I'm told he's a pretty-regular-kind-of-neighbor, too.
Wonder if Bob Vila cuts his own grass? 8-)
|
4.475 | What kind of mower??? | DCSVAX::COTE | Oh wait! Oh-oh! To be! | Thu Aug 02 1990 16:28 | 3 |
| Was he using a Honda?
Edd
|
4.476 | Mowing Styles of the Rich & Famous | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Aug 02 1990 19:19 | 1 |
| Hey, Mike Dukakis mows his own lawn, with a hand mower yet!
|
4.477 | re: .409 | SAVAGE::LOCKRIDGE | Artificial Insanity | Fri Aug 03 1990 14:43 | 9 |
| re: .409
> -< Mowing Styles of the Rich & Famous >-
Shouldn't that be INFamous?
:-)
-Bob
|
4.478 | Mike pushing a mower | NOEDGE::REITH | Jim Reith DTN 291-0072 - PDM1-1/J9 | Mon Aug 06 1990 17:56 | 4 |
| Re: .409
A push mower? Whattsamatta, he can't afford the price of gas in Taxachusettes
either?
|
4.479 | Bob Vila returns! | VIRGO::KEATING | | Wed Sep 26 1990 14:52 | 8 |
| Bob Vila's new show, "Home Again with Bob Vila", I think its called,
was on the Tube last sunday. Bob had a wicked case of laryngitis
as he was building a new cape, with the addition of an older section
from a house from Dennis, in Marston Mills, Cape Cod. Interesting
thing about this show, every move and decision is cost justified, and a
price is put on every subs part of the project. It wasn't bad, but it
sure was like the old TOH. It was on WBZ-TV, channel 4, Boston, at
|
4.480 | Time for Vila's return | VIRGO::KEATING | | Wed Sep 26 1990 14:53 | 2 |
| re: 412, the last sentence was missed. WBZ-TV, Boston, at 12:00 noon.
tjk
|
4.481 | Bob's fun, but anything for DIY on the tube? | HPSTEK::BELANGER | Scurvy sea dog | Wed Sep 26 1990 16:17 | 10 |
| Do any shows air that help DIY'ers? Watching Bob deflate and ruin
someone's life savings is fun and entertaining (while he socializes
with the sub's :^) ), but I wanna do-it-myself, and see how!
I'm solving this problem at present by taking a construction carpentry
course at my local voke-tech high school, 'fer $150 I get a 60 hour
course, with some hammer-slingin' included... I can't afford to pay
someone to do something I can learn how to do (carpentry aint rocket
science, so it goes :^) ).
Fred
|
4.482 | | VMSDEV::PAULKM::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Wed Sep 26 1990 17:31 | 3 |
| Actually, the "Hometime" series is pretty decent.
Paul
|
4.483 | I second Hometime | NITMOI::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Thu Sep 27 1990 12:03 | 8 |
| Hometime even has a few shows on how to be your own general contractor.
Their shows are definitely geared to do-it-yourselfers. And, they
cover everything from minor improvements, to remodelling, to additions,
building a home, landscaping and landscaping improvements. They also
market video tapes of the subjects covered on their shows. The tapes
cover each aspect in greater detail that the 30 minute PBS format.
These tapes are available at Sommerville Lumber (and probably lots of
other places) for about $10 each.
|
4.484 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Sep 27 1990 13:20 | 5 |
| I read in TV Guide that a new cable TV channel is starting up next
year called "The How-To Channel" that will carry programming related
to DIY.
Steve
|
4.485 | Not enough detail | DDIF::FRIDAY | This space available for eminent domain | Thu Sep 27 1990 17:36 | 12 |
| Re .417 (Hometime)
I've watched Hometime from time to time, and have seldom been satisfied
with the level of coverage. It's pretty spotty in terms of the amount
of detail that they provide. For certain simple kinds of jobs they
seem to provide enough detail, but the more complex a job is (or
perhaps it depends on how much they want to cram into a single program)
the more they seem to gloss over the essential details.
I think these programs are probably ok for showing general work flow,
but that extensive reading, as well as talking to professionals and
other DIYers, are absolutely necessary to really avoid mistakes and get
the job done.
|
4.486 | | MFGMEM::S_JOHNSON | Underdog: The Movie | Thu Sep 27 1990 18:45 | 14 |
| Re (Hometime)
I agree with -.1, although I like the show. One of Hometime's tricks is
to give you just what you said-- sketchy info in the PBS shown material--
then at the end of the show, run their own ad for VCR tapes with "more
on <fill in DIY topic>" for $9.99. Maybe these go into the details missed
on TV. Good marketing strategy, though.
Steve
got a kick out of Dean Johnson who, on a recent Hometime episode,
repeatedly referred to a water heater as a "hot water heater"
|
4.487 | | ULTNIX::taber | KC1TD - Monoelement 5-bander up 285 ft (ASL.) | Fri Sep 28 1990 11:51 | 13 |
| Re: .419
Just how much detail do you think they can get into in half an hour? I
think it's a plus that they have the more detailed tapes available so
that if you're interested in the details you can watch them. I got
their gardening tape after watching the gardening show -- the tape is a
*lot* more detailed and cuts out some of the fluff that was put in the
show to entertain the TV audience. The tape ran a LOT longer than the
show. It's still not as detailed as a good book, but it has the
advantage of being able to show techniques instead of just describing
them. If you compare it to This Old House, where you get ONLY sketchy
info and NO place to go for more detail, it seems like Hometime is not bad at all.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
4.488 | | MFGMEM::S_JOHNSON | Underdog: The Movie | Fri Sep 28 1990 17:04 | 5 |
| re .420
Like I said, good marketing strategy.
Steve
|
4.489 | that time again... | GWYNED::HENKEL | | Mon Oct 01 1990 12:39 | 1 |
| Anyone know what this season's TOH project is going to be?
|
4.490 | Triple Decker Renovation | NRADM::PARENT | IT'S NOT PMS-THIS IS HOW I REALLY AM | Mon Oct 01 1990 12:57 | 6 |
| According to Channel 2's magazine, they plan on renovating an old
triple decker somewhere in the Boston area. I just skimmed the
article but recall some mention of returning to the original intent
of the show.
ep
|
4.491 | | LVSB::GAGNON | Iraqnophobia...catch it! | Mon Oct 01 1990 18:18 | 7 |
| Regarding HOMETIME...
I'm not a slob, but I would like to do some of the things they do and remain
that clean after. Do they ever get dirty?? :-)
Kevin
|
4.492 | re .-1 | NITMOI::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Tue Oct 02 1990 11:23 | 2 |
| They use stunt doubles... The doubles are used for anything requiring dirt or
sweat, then the regulars jump back into the shots for the cameras.
|
4.493 | *Anything but* Santa Fe and adobe! | PETERJ::JOHNSON | | Tue Oct 02 1990 15:58 | 0 |
4.494 | back to affordable remodeling for ordinary folks .. | AHIKER::EARLY | Bob Early Dtn 264-6252 T&N EIC Engineering | Thu Oct 04 1990 19:42 | 20 |
| re: -< Triple Decker Renovation >-
>According to Channel 2's magazine, they plan on renovating an old
>triple decker somewhere in the Boston area. I just skimmed the
>article but recall some mention of returning to the original intent
>of the show.
With the original intent being how to show poeple ways of improving
renovating older homes at a reaonable cost. Somethinmg like what
ordinary people might be able to afford.
I read the same article in October's 'GBH Magazine (is that the
same as CH 2?), and it looks like xxxx Abrams from the Wood_Shop
will be part of the cast.
-BobE
|
4.495 | Hot Water Heater to go | DECLNE::WATKINS | Elvis is living in Peoria | Tue Oct 09 1990 12:06 | 2 |
| Back to 419. Outside of the N.E. area water heaters are called hot
water heaters as often as not.
|
4.496 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Oct 09 1990 12:54 | 3 |
| So tell me, you folks who object to the term "hot water heater," is the
water in yours ever cold? Face it, it takes hot water and makes it hotter.
Now, if somebody called it a "hotter water heater," I'd be the first to object.
|
4.497 | Jack told us to get rid of the cold water coolers | CLUSTA::GLANTZ | Mike @TAY Littleton MA, 227-4299 | Tue Oct 09 1990 13:15 | 2 |
| Sure, the water in mine has been cold at least once. Isn't this issue
a hot one? :-)
|
4.498 | New TOH house | ISLNDS::KELLY | | Fri Oct 12 1990 11:51 | 28 |
| Caught the first episode of the new TOH last night. Steve and Norm
are reno'ing a triple decker in JP (?), to provide a home for the
owner and two apartments for low-to-middle income tenants. The
city of Boston is overseeing the reno as part of the 'Rebuilding
Boston' campaign.
The house is in rough shape. One wall has bellied out, creating
a major league crack between the floor and exterior wall that runs
along two or three rooms.
The plan is to replace bathrooms (3), kitchens (3), the plumbing
and heating systems, repair everything else. The budget is $100k,
which is refreshing after the Wickwire's half-million effort in
Concord.
One thing I don't like is the fact that the contractor (Abel
<lastname?>) plans to put vinyl siding over every exterior surface
and blueboard over every interior surface, rather than remove old
siding and rebuild. All the window trim is getting yanked and
replaced, because it's too expensive to strip and repaint. I guess
it will help to keep the cost down.
The woman who owns the place has a lovely accent (maybe Jamaican?).
The is the first house in years of TOH that I felt was something
I could do, unlike the Wickwires, the Lexington bed and breakfast,
the farmhouse in Westwood, etc. This seems much like the first
TOH.
|
4.499 | | WEFXEM::COTE | Light, sweet, crude... | Fri Oct 12 1990 12:35 | 5 |
| Jamaica Plain and Abel Lopes.
Yeah, that place is *rough*!!
Edd
|
4.500 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Oct 12 1990 12:43 | 2 |
| Steve Thomas doesn't like spiders much, does he?
|
4.501 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Fri Oct 12 1990 19:02 | 15 |
| > One thing I don't like is the fact that the contractor (Abel
> <lastname?>) plans to put vinyl siding over every exterior surface
> and blueboard over every interior surface, rather than remove old
> siding and rebuild. All the window trim is getting yanked and
> replaced, because it's too expensive to strip and repaint. I guess
> it will help to keep the cost down.
I understood that they're replacing entire windows, not just trim.
The reason was that its MUCH cheaper than removeing lead paint. I
assumed that covering rather than removeing lead paint was the
reason for doing all the walls with blueboard.
I have mixed feelings about the finyl siding, but it may be the
best idea in terms of cost effectivness. After all, there is no
point in going with Cadilac appointments in a Chevy neighborhood!
|
4.502 | Goodby, This Old Dream House!!! | LVSB::GAGNON | Iraqnophobia...catch it! | Mon Oct 15 1990 17:34 | 6 |
| It was refreshing to see the show again where they have to stay within
a specified budget, I'd like to see them do that for a change.
Kevin
|
4.503 | Vanilla | ODIXIE::RAMSEY | Take this job and Love it! | Mon Oct 15 1990 18:27 | 12 |
| They asked the new owner if she had chosen colors for the outside.
Here she is given the opportunity to pick any color combination in the
world with new siding and new roofing material and new windows.
"Oh yes, white siding with black trim." How boring.
I to will echo the refreshing look at a project that has a reasonable
budget for a change. $100K for 3 kitchens, 3 baths, 3 heating systems,
all new wiring, all new plumbing, siding, windows, sheetrock and trim.
Finally a challenge for the "This Multi-million Dollar All New from the
Ground Up House" show.
|
4.504 | Redundancy | CLOSET::DUM::T_PARMENTER | Guns no one can see | Wed Oct 17 1990 12:15 | 4 |
| The heaters in most automobiles are hot-water heaters.
The water heater in my house is just that: put cold water in it and hot water
comes out.
|
4.505 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Oct 17 1990 15:07 | 4 |
| >The water heater in my house is just that: put cold water in it and hot water
>comes out.
So it's a cold water heater.
|
4.506 | | TLE::FELDMAN | Larix decidua, var. decify | Wed Oct 17 1990 21:01 | 4 |
| And, of course, it is the engines in the car that are the hot water heaters,
while the heaters are the hot water coolers.
Gary
|
4.507 | Mr. Hyphen to the rescue | CLOSET::DUM::T_PARMENTER | Guns no one can see | Thu Oct 18 1990 15:13 | 1 |
| ah, so the hot water cooler is a hot-water heater
|
4.508 | | BPOV02::RIDGE | Trouble w/you is the trouble w/me | Thu Oct 18 1990 15:49 | 5 |
| almost, It's the hot water heater is really a hot water cooler.
This sounds like a subject for the Department of Redundent Reduncency
|
4.509 | so Guido has a day job too? | WUMBCK::FOX | | Fri Oct 19 1990 11:32 | 4 |
| Is it me, or does that roofer (Abel) sound EXACTLY like father Guido
Sarduci? Wife and I were howling every time that guy spoke!
John
|
4.510 | It's for my own good, right? | RTL::LEACH | | Fri Oct 19 1990 11:41 | 16 |
|
Did it strike anyone as odd that spray paint, with its use of CFCs and
its threat to the ozone layer, was used to mark that woodwork which had
dangerous levels of lead?
Once again, Big Brother treads into the lives of us 'mericans. Think of
the expense involved to remove the years of paint found in a vintage house
that has woodwork out the wazoo. How about that antique furniture, with
its original paint intact. Should that also be stripped? It'd be a cold
day in hell before I ever did it to mine!
Odd I grew up without a hankering to sup upon paint chips, or at the
very least, my parents had the good sense to restrain my mischievous ways.
No doubt, the vast majority of us were likewise raised.
Patrick
|
4.511 | | PAXVAX::COOK | Al Cook, VAXELN Engineering | Fri Oct 19 1990 13:05 | 11 |
|
> Did it strike anyone as odd that spray paint, with its use of CFCs and
>its threat to the ozone layer, was used to mark that woodwork which had
>dangerous levels of lead?
Is this true? I thought CFCs in spray cans were outlawed years ago, but
then I haven't checked the labels lately either.
al
|
4.512 | Leave it to Mass.!! | LVSB::GAGNON | Iraqnophobia...catch it! | Fri Oct 19 1990 14:18 | 16 |
| I thought that the process for removing lead paint was a bit of
an overkill. Of course I grew up around lead paint, my parent grew
up around lead paint, as did my grandparents, and noone has ever
showed any signs of lead poisoning. I thought that you could only
get high levels of lead poisoning by ingesting quite a bit of paint
chips, and not by just breathing in a little dust now and then.
I could be wrong, but I did think it was a bit much!
Plus, did you hear the cost? $3,000 to $7,000 is quite a price to
pay! And seeing how in Mass. it's a law, the home owner loses and
the businesses win big.
Thank the man above I live in N.H.
Kevin
|
4.513 | Lead paint digress | OPUS::CLEMENCE | | Fri Oct 19 1990 15:25 | 17 |
|
Digress on...
> I thought that you could only
> get high levels of lead poisoning by ingesting quite a bit of paint
> chips, and not by just breathing in a little dust now and then.
From my wife, who is a nurse, you could get lead poisoning from
as little as a thumbnail size peice of paint. The other problem is that
it doesn't leave the body, it accumulates.
Digress off..
Bill
|
4.514 | | MFGMEM::S_JOHNSON | Underdog: The Movie | Fri Oct 19 1990 15:56 | 30 |
| re .445
> I could be wrong, but I did think it was a bit much!
No, you're not wrong. It is MASSIVE overkill. Did you hear Norm
needling the deleader about it being overkill? Especially in the
room that had just one window with lead paint. The entire room
had to be cordoned off, sealed up, plastic put on the floor to
catch paint chips when the window os removed.
> Plus, did you hear the cost? $3,000 to $7,000 is quite a price to
> pay! And seeing how in Mass. it's a law, the home owner loses and
> the businesses win big.
When norm asked the guy, "well, homeowners can just buy a some of this
paint stripper and do it themselves, right?", he said "no, deleading
is for certified deleaders only".
Translation: "We have a monopoly on this market, and no one else
is allowed to do this. This is how we get away with charging
these exhorbitant, ridiculous prices, since competition is thrown
out the window."
> Thank the man above I live in N.H.
Curious: Is there no lead paint law of any sort in NH?
Steve
|
4.515 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Shhh... Mad Scientist at work... | Fri Oct 19 1990 17:46 | 7 |
| re .443/.444:
CFC's have been outlawed as a spray propellant since around 1980.
Be careful around fire, they use propane/butane as propellants now.
-Mike
|
4.516 | | TLE::FELDMAN | Larix decidua, var. decify | Fri Oct 19 1990 18:18 | 5 |
| Just saw a blurb in Business Week about a company that's going to start
selling aerosol products where the propellant is carbon dioxide, where the CO2
is obtained as a byproduct of other processes.
GAry
|
4.517 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Oct 19 1990 19:00 | 3 |
| Great - just what we need to contribute to global warming!
Steve
|
4.518 | Is nitrous oxide harmful to atmosphere?? | SALEM::LAYTON | | Mon Oct 22 1990 10:34 | 7 |
| Real digression...
Ice Cream parlors use Nitrous Oxide as a propellant for whipped
cream. I suppose you could use it as a general airosol propellant...
just for laughs...
Carl
|
4.519 | When you look for the bad, you'll find it somewhere | ULTNIX::taber | KC1TD - Monoelement 5-bander up 285 ft (ASL.) | Mon Oct 22 1990 11:43 | 9 |
| Re: .450
If, as the note implied, the carbon dioxide is waste gas from a process
that would have dumped it anyway, then it seems pretty laudable that
they're at least getting a litte more good from it. Besides (not a
topic for discussion in this file) although global warming is an
article of faith these days, the facts are still being examined.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
4.520 | Exhalation contributes to global warming | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Oct 22 1990 11:52 | 4 |
| re .450:
Steve, do you drink soda or beer? If so, you're contributing to
global warming.
|
4.521 | Really, it's in there! | SNDPIT::SMITH | Smoking -> global warming! :+) | Mon Oct 22 1990 12:05 | 6 |
| In the notice of a stockholders meeting of RJ Reynolds this past year
was an item from a group so far out on the fringes it was funny, who
claimed that (among other things) smoking contributes to global
warming.
Willie
|
4.522 | Don't know in NH! | LVSB::GAGNON | Iraqnophobia...catch it! | Mon Oct 22 1990 14:33 | 13 |
| > Curious: Is there no lead paint law of any sort in NH?
I really don't know what the laws are regarding lead paint removal.
Maybe someone out there knows.
I agree about the overkill. They could have hung plastic from the
ceiling and block off about 24 sp feet around the window, instead
of sealing the whole room.
Kevin
|
4.523 | Even in New Hampshire | CLOSET::DUM::T_PARMENTER | Guns no one can see | Tue Oct 23 1990 11:53 | 5 |
| There is a medical condition called pica, an abnormal desire to eat substances
such as clay, ashes, and plaster. The condition is frequently found in
poorly nourished children. Lead poisoning results in permanent brain damage.
I agree that the state-mandated methods of removal are overkill, but there is
a genuine problem being addressed.
|
4.524 | | BPOV02::RIDGE | Trouble w/you is the trouble w/me | Tue Oct 23 1990 12:37 | 3 |
| I believe that my pediatrician routinely tests for level's of lead when
the kids have their annual check up. Done when they analyse the blood
sample.
|
4.525 | | WMOIS::FERRARI_G | | Tue Oct 23 1990 14:36 | 16 |
| Steve,
You're right on the lead poisoning test. Our pediatrician also
has it done when the kids go in. I think it's the law to have it
done annually (?) until they reach a certain age.
FWIW, I knew a former resident whose kids had tested positive for lead
poisoning. It was reported to the state who sent people out to check
for lead paint, and he was told that he had to be removed. They
allowed him to strip most of it himself, but when the kids continually
tested positive, they took him to court. Final resolution was that
he was given a low-interest loan or only had to partial pay for
licensed de-leaders to come in a do the house. I lost touch w/him, so
I don't know how the kids are doing.
|
4.526 | acceptable levels keep going down | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Tue Oct 23 1990 18:49 | 9 |
| I was talking to a woman who treats quite a few kids with high
blood levels of lead, and she told me that the acceptable levels
keep coming down. It seems that as we remove lead from the air
(most gasoline now is unleaded) it is possible to get kid's blood
levels of lead down. It seems that everytime a study is done, they
find harmful effects of lead at lower blood levels. She expected
the acceptable level to be lowered again.
--David
|
4.527 | Not a bad business | CSCMA::DENCE | | Wed Oct 24 1990 18:30 | 15 |
| I noticed that the disposal of the "lead chips" left a little to
be desired. They stated that "after they have been removed" they
are tested and "if" they contain lead, they have to be disposed
of by an authorized disposal company. I question why they don't
test before they remove all of the paint. Ah, the price of the
job might be less if they did.
Remind me of the hazardous waste day we had in our town a while
ago. I was not allowed out of my car to even unlock the trunk.
You apparently have to have a "suit" and mask to do that job.
Wonder why they allowed me to put them in?? It wasn't too bad
of a day for them. 8 people worked for 4 hours and it only cost
the town $22,000.
Some of it is overkill!
|
4.528 | yer not kiddin | CLUSTA::GLANTZ | Mike 227-4299 @TAY Littleton MA | Wed Oct 24 1990 18:59 | 2 |
| My brother-in-law's in that business. He spends his spare time at
yacht dealers. No kiddin.
|
4.529 | It's fun to watch again. | LVSB::GAGNON | Iraqnophobia...catch it! | Mon Oct 29 1990 15:49 | 16 |
| It's been real nice to watch this show the last few episodes. They've
really been trying to stay within a normal budget.
The deleading issue came up again about the outside clapboards.
This lead paint thing is really a mess.
I thought it was amuzing to see the disgrunted look on the plumbers
face when he was told that the budget would allow him to use his
state of the products, but get back to normal plumbing.
Does anyone have that type of newpaper-blown insulation in their
house, that they could give an opinion on?
I am thinking of having it done to my house.
kevin
|
4.530 | heating installation | OASS::BURDEN_D | He's no fun, he fell right over | Mon Oct 29 1990 16:50 | 9 |
| So this week the heating guy told them to keep the camera people away so they
could finish up sooner. Will we see any of that on the show or will it be:
"Here's the finished heating system, hope you like it."
Also, everytime he looked at a baseboard unit or water heater the first thing
that was said was , "What's wrong with this one?"
Dave
|
4.531 | Pay no attention to that dent behind the curtain! | MAST::DUTTON | Recursion: see recursive | Mon Oct 29 1990 16:52 | 9 |
| For further yucks...
there was the demo by the siding installation guy about how tough that
vinyl siding was -- he takes a hammer, and pounds on an installed
section. "See that!" he says, "ya can't hurt this stuff!" I look...
looks a sizeable dent in it to me! :) He then quickly put his hand
over the spot he pounded until the camera panned away... :)
|
4.532 | One little post | DECLNE::WATKINS | Elvis is living in Peoria | Tue Oct 30 1990 17:43 | 3 |
| $5K TO 8K for the deck on back seemed a bit much also. But of course
that one 4X4 or 6X6 35 ft long was probably 2K of the total. The whole
deck assy supported by one pole? Not at my house.
|
4.533 | | WEFXEM::COTE | Can't touch this... | Sun Nov 04 1990 19:26 | 4 |
| It's refreshing to hear Trethewey talk about "first" costs. These are
the types of decisions homeowners in the real world have to make.
Edd
|
4.534 | But only when the camera is rolling... | RTL::LEACH | | Mon Nov 05 1990 10:34 | 9 |
|
My brother works for the Rebuilding Boston program. He told me that the
general contractor for the job had his plumber quote a price for overhauling
the services of the project. When Rich Treathewey saw the quote he threw a
temper tantrum whining that he couldn't match the quote and make money.
He finally agreed (must be the TV-time that appeased him) and met the
quote. I always suspected that guy was a bit on the sleazy side.
Patrick
|
4.535 | Lead and Insulation | CAPNET::BARCLAY | | Thu Apr 11 1991 15:50 | 27 |
| There is a strange loopwhole in the regulations about lead. I have a
house that is about 260 years old and no one alive knows when it was
painted. Everyone is, however, pretty sure that the paint is lead
based. The thing is in such bad shape I've decided to strip it and
re-clapboard it. Now, the Board of Health will not let me put those
horrible old clapboards in the dump!! Lead, you know. Leachate and
other yukkies to damage our mother earth. What they suggest is that I
put them in an old barn cellar hole I have and (are you sitting down??)
burn them! Now there's the way to get rid of the stuff. The lead
filled smoke, being lighter than cooler air, will be 'up there'
somewhere where we needn't worry about it.
Re: .462, I think, who asked about the paper based insulation. I
installed the stuff about 15 years ago. I will say that it went in
easier than any other form of insulation I have ever worked with. It
also doesn't make you itch when you work with it. (It does make you
sneeze, however.) It has proven to be an excellent insulator and has
saved me a lot of money. ON THE OTHER HAND - - I am now in the process
of replacing/changing/adding to/improving all of the wiring in the
house. Damn, I hate that stuff. You can't just lift it up and work
under it. It is everwhere. It clings to everthing. I installed two
power vents in bathrooms. This involves cutting a whole 13.25" in
diameter in the ceiling. Even with a drop cloth I ended up with what
looked to be about 4 tons of the stuff on the floor, in the tub, in my
hair, up my nose - EVERYWHERE. If you plan to insulate with the blown
in stuff, be sure you will never work on your basic structure again.
|
4.536 | | TOKLAS::1006 | Larix decidua, var. decify | Fri Apr 12 1991 23:33 | 8 |
| That could be a loophole in the law, or it could just be self-interested
BoH members. They're responsible for the leachate from the landfill, which
they're required to monitor and correct if it fails to meet standards. But
there's no one on their case about air pollution. If you burn something
in violation of air pollution control laws, the local BoH isn't likely to
get involved unless someone complains to them.
Gary
|
4.537 | | REGENT::WOODWARD | I'll put this moment...here | Wed Oct 23 1991 12:15 | 7 |
| Another season of this old house is here! (I love TOH). There's a big
house they're redoing in Wayland MA...I missed the first episode, but
last night's was about roofing and perking. Plus, they showed how the
house developed over the years. Does anyone know what night this show
airs on PBS in NH?
Kathy
|
4.538 | Thurday and Sunday on Channel 11 | SALEM::SHIVELY | Thank GOD for NEXT UNSEEN | Wed Oct 23 1991 13:21 | 3 |
| This old house air at 7:30 Pm on Thursday and again at
11:00 AM on Sunday on Channel 11.
|
4.539 | A Digit? | ELWOOD::LANE | | Wed Oct 23 1991 14:47 | 5 |
| > Another season of this old house is here! (I love TOH). There's a big
> house they're redoing in Wayland MA...I missed the first episode, but
I have this nagging little voice in my head that tells me the owner of the
Weyland house works at DEC but I didn't hear his name correctly.
|
4.540 | | CUPMK::PHILBROOK | Customer Publications Consulting | Wed Oct 23 1991 15:32 | 26 |
| As I recall, the house (a huge Federal style home) was built in the
18th century. A massive room on the second floor (~20' x ~40') was
built to accommodate town hall meetings due to the town hall having
been destroyed by fire (I think). Part of the home was even constructed
with beams from the original town hall -- and the front door is the
actual door from the old town hall.
The house is on a busy street near to a very busy intersection. Many
changes have been made to the original structure of the house over the
years -- most, if not all, of which have been documented. An
architectural historian is assisting with the renovation in order to
maintain the historical integrity of the home.
The homeowner inherited the house from his parents who lived there for
~20 years and ran a small antique business out of the house. In fact,
the house is filled with a number of old pieces of furniture.
The homeowner's renovation budget is $200K! Although, they'll likely go
over that. Estimates for repairs to the septic system, roof and outside
structures, in addition to the heating plant and wiring, are approaching
$100K already.
It's a tremendously beautiful home and this should be a great project
and fun to watch.
Mike
|
4.541 | It's near Maynard too | USPMLO::GILLIGAN | I brew, therefore I am | Wed Oct 23 1991 15:36 | 5 |
| The house, called Kirkside, is at the intersection of routes 27 and 20.
If you're inclined to take a look.
-brian
|
4.542 | | CUPMK::PHILBROOK | Customer Publications Consulting | Wed Oct 23 1991 15:47 | 8 |
| Yes, and "Kirkside" is ?Irish? for "by the church" which is appropriate
since this house is next to a church.
It's too bad they have to dig up the garden for the septic system,
though. I cringed when they were perc-testing last week -- all those
major holes in the back AND FRONT yard!
Mike
|
4.543 | | PROXY::HOPKINS | Volunteer of the month | Wed Oct 23 1991 16:21 | 8 |
| I saw the first episode. Though it needs lots of work it is gorgeous!
What amazed me was when ??whats-his-name?? first went through the house
it looked like it needed some work (a little paint here and there). But
when Norm and his buddy came through and picked it apart, it needed LOTS
of work. It made me realize how important it is to have an inspector who
knows what to look for.
Marie
|
4.544 | Live Update | JOKUR::JOKUR::FALKOF | | Wed Oct 23 1991 17:39 | 18 |
| I live just up the road from That Old House and if you look at it
today, you'll see that they better hurry up the exterior work before
winter sets in. That nice overhanging roof is held up by 2x6's and
there is only mud underneath. They built a nice-ish fence on the Route
20 side to keep sidewalk supervisors from slowing traffic. You can see
piles of dirt from the excavations. Contractors' signs hang on the
fence. Trucks come and go.
Oddly, the Unitarian Church next door has begun some renovations to its
steeple.
The intersection of 27 and 20 IS a busy one, so watch the road, not the
house.
One nice benefit was that the Police/Fire station across the street got
a nice new sign as filming began. Don't know if the town did that or if
it was a special from the show, as the previous sign was dingy.
|
4.545 | the mother of all TOH'es? | WEDOIT::ROBERTS | Steel wheels & wheel Guns | Wed Oct 23 1991 17:41 | 8 |
|
This could be the budget buster of all TOH'es to date.
I think the 18th century wall paper is all they're not
going to touch.
Gary
|
4.546 | question | USPMLO::GILLIGAN | I brew, therefore I am | Wed Oct 23 1991 17:55 | 10 |
| re .478
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the donated material
considered taxable income? If it is, the poor guy is never going to
keep it under $200,000. I was surprised with how they fixed the corner
of the roof on the last show. Seemed too low-tech (read, not expensive
enough)
-brian
|
4.547 | The taxman will get his share ... | BROKE::LEE | Just trying to get stuff to work | Thu Oct 24 1991 16:21 | 3 |
| The companies that "donate" materials to the owner will have to generate the
proper 1099/whatever form .... unless these companies can somehow include the
possible tax into the cost.
|
4.548 | Money pit? I'd love to see it. When do they tape the shows? | SNAX::HURWITZ | Things that make you go hmmmmmm | Thu Oct 24 1991 22:07 | 6 |
| RE: That live update...
Anyone know how many shows are taped ahead of showing time?
just curious,
Steve (boy that house _is_ going to be beautiful)
|
4.549 | | REGENT::WOODWARD | I'll put this moment...here | Mon Nov 11 1991 09:45 | 9 |
| I don't know how far ahead they tape the shows, but over the weekend
they said it was just beginning to be Fall around the area. They were
still in short sleeves though. So, maybe the show over the weekend was
shot around early September?
Did they say they have to jack up the house? I didn't catch some of
the show...
Kathy
|
4.550 | | KOALA::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Mon Nov 11 1991 12:12 | 7 |
| >> Did they say they have to jack up the house? I didn't catch some of
>> the show...
NO...They said they had to support the house, then knock out the sill.
But they didn't want to jack it up.
Mike
|
4.551 | | WUMBCK::FOX | | Fri Jan 03 1992 18:55 | 7 |
| Caught last night's episode of TOH. I see they are using the ever-
favorite radiant floor heating for at least part of the house.
Why are they so sold on it, yet the rest of the industry seems to
ignore it?
John
|
4.552 | | RANGER::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Mon Jan 06 1992 10:08 | 5 |
| Easy...
The rest of the industry has to deal with things called budget constraints.
The average consumer must ask questions like: Do I want radiant floor heating
*OR* kitchen appliances?
|
4.553 | | WUMBCK::FOX | | Mon Jan 06 1992 10:56 | 6 |
| However the plumber on the show gives you the impression that RFH is
not that more expensive than conventional.
I get the impression the bulk of the industry just doesn't want to
change, because, well, of all the reasons change is avoided.
John
|
4.554 | Does TOH count the cost of limited expertise? | MAY21::PSMITH | Peter H. Smith,MLO5-5/E71,223-4663,ESB | Mon Jan 06 1992 12:26 | 5 |
| It may not be more expensive materials/time wise for an experienced
installer. But there aren't many experienced installers right now. So
as a consumer, you have to either become a 'guinea pig' and suffer the
consequences of a poor installation, or you have to pay someone a premium
because they are an "expert".
|
4.555 | | RANGER::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Mon Jan 06 1992 13:16 | 8 |
| Something about the plumber on TOH saying "not much more expensive than" that
really makes me cautious. I'm sure it's not much more for the plumber, and
maybe even for the TOH victim of the season. However, I just can't imagine a
flooring contractor putting a special clause in that says if there is a pressure
drop in the heating line due to their fasteners, they will pay to remove the
flooring and replace/repair the hole and replace the flooring. I think that
there are lots of hidden costs that lurk just below the surface (pardon the
pun).
|
4.556 | My thoughts! | CGVAX2::DRY | | Mon Jan 06 1992 14:04 | 8 |
| I personally think that the "not much more expensve than" statement is
made, in the homes that have had heat systems that were hot water to
radiators already in place, or had to install a whole new heating
system, chose hot circulated water, and had to install all the lines
anyway. If one had electric, oil, or gas forced air system, then the
system would be very expensive, in comparison, to install.
Randy
|
4.557 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Mon Jan 06 1992 14:20 | 15 |
| Whatever the relevent cost, I'm not sure that underfloor radiant heat
is very good anyway. Richard Trethewey's comments bore out the
experience I had working in an office building heated with electric
underfloor radiant heat. At the floor, the tempreature is about 80 F
and at chest to head height it is around 68 to 70.
I don't like cold feet ... but this system is good for giving one
hot sweaty feet ... all that warmth on the feet, expecially when clad
in shoes is really not that comfortable in the long term (and I
wouldn't want to barefoot in the kitchen ... too many flying knives
forks and bits of food!
Stuart
|
4.558 | | WUMBCK::FOX | | Mon Jan 06 1992 14:44 | 6 |
| re .487
I think you hit it on the head. Someone expert in this (like Trethewey)
can name his price, since said customer probably can't go to the next
name in the phone book for the same level of expertise in RFH.
John
|
4.559 | reliability?? | HPSRAD::HOWARTH | | Mon Jan 06 1992 14:59 | 18 |
| If I recall, the plastic tubing used for radiant heating is
temperature limited to 200 degrees F. Because I'm not sure about
my memory on this topic, please don't quote this as fact.
The point I would raise if the temperature limit is 200,is reliability.
It would seem that the reliability is compromised if the water
temperature in the heating loop approaches this temperature. When
I mention reliability, I'm talking years, not months. I wouldn't
want to rip out something like that after it had been in place for
15 years because of a material failure. Note, copper is no bargin
either when covered with concrete.
Of course, the boiler temperature could be lowered but then, your
house had better have enough radiation or you might not be able
to get the temperature up during cold days.
Joe
|
4.560 | | WUMBCK::FOX | | Mon Jan 06 1992 15:21 | 9 |
| I believe the water temp in RFH is much lower than 200 - more like
80-120?
As far as reliability... The shpeal Trewthewey gives, when asked
that planted question, is that "it's been used for (some number
of years) in (some very cold country) and hasn't failed yet
(or something along those lines). He usually gets into the testing
that the material undergoes, life expectancies, etc.
John
|
4.561 | A hidden pipe always leaks... | MANTHN::EDD | I been shattered (shay-oo-bee) | Mon Jan 06 1992 16:53 | 9 |
| There's *something* about the thought of laying 7-800" of plastic pipe
on metal trays ("leak here, drip someplace else") and making the whole
she-bang inaccesable by covering it with CEMENT (ARGH!) that just gives
me a bad case of the willies...
"Edd, there's a little wet spot in the cellar under the kitchen. Should
we worry?"
Edd
|
4.562 | No way until its longevity has been proven. | SSBN1::YANKES | | Tue Jan 07 1992 11:09 | 10 |
|
Re: .494
I agree totally. The thought of putting something as error-prone
as hundreds and hundreds of feet of tubing doing something as critical
as providing heat in an area that is as inaccessible as being covered
with cement sounds like something that would eventually show up in the
"Why did they ever do that?" note in this notesfile!
-craig
|
4.563 | not such a new system.... | AKOCOA::CWALTERS | | Tue Jan 07 1992 12:28 | 36 |
|
A few years ago, every one was saying the same thing about plastic
waste and waterpipes that were (omigosh) *glued* together. One thing
you have to take into account was that this system was primarily
designed for installation in new construction - I wouldn't favour it
for add-ons or upgrades. Whatever, don't you think that the system
would be approved for building code if it had not already been tested
in specimen installations over a period of years?
Regarding longevity, How about 1800 years? The romans used similar
technique in the tepidarium of their public baths, as well as
underfloor hot-air heating (hypocausts). The advantage is that the
concrete acts as a heat store and provides very stable temperatures but
it what they did not make clear on TOH (unless I missed it) is that it
requires a secondary system to give effective temperature control. The
slab takes a long time to cool, so you can't turn it down and expect
instant results. The last thing you would want to do is run it at
80deg - It's probably best kept at around 68% and then boosted or
controlled with a circulating fan.
A second major advantage is being able switch energy sources easily -
Oil, gas, propane, wood, compost (compost?) This technique has been
used for remote houses, where the heat source was a huge compost heap.
(The installation was a forestry cottage). First, they dig out a pit
adjacent to the house. next fill half-way with wastewood chippings
from the logging camp. Install plastic pipe in loops and fill & cap
the pit. The pipe connects direct to underfloor heating pipes in the
cottage, and the pit gives heat for about 6 months between refills.
The composted bark mulch is bagged and sold to garden centres - a
totally no-waste operation.
Regards,
Colin
|
4.564 | | SYORPD::DEEP | Bob Deep @SYO, DTN 256-5708 | Tue Jan 07 1992 13:02 | 14 |
| I can understand why there is trepidation about encasing the system in concrete,
but as I think about it, I don't think there will be any reason why I would
need access to the tubing once the concrete has cured.
If the tubing developes a leak, the water is still going to flow in the path
of least resistance. It will follow the mold, rather than seep through the
concrete in any quantity. I would think that you could even have a major break,
and still not have a real problem. In fact, the only thing I could forsee that
would screw you is if you had a part of the tubing break off and plug the system
so bad that it couldn't be blown free with compressed air.
Doesn't seem very likely to me.
Bob
|
4.565 | | KOALA::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Tue Jan 07 1992 13:03 | 10 |
|
One thing I havn't seen mentioned yet as to why it's not wide spread
yet, is because of the flooring. In most homes you find either hardwood
floors or carpeting. This type of heating systems dosn't work to well
with this type of flooring. Personally I only like tile in a bathroom.
So I'm not about to spend that kind of money just to heat a bathroom. I
guess if you like tile flooring, then it would make a good choice.
Sorry, but not for me.
Mike
|
4.566 | | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Tue Jan 07 1992 14:02 | 13 |
| re .497
Your are right for the most part, but if the house ever develops a
settling crack... I know of one house build on a slab that had this
problem. The water from the radiant heat pipes got through the concrete
somehow and flooded the entire lower level. All of the wall to wall
rugs were ruined.
On top of the ruined rugs they had to install an entire new heat
delivery system. It was way too expensive to fix the radiant heat
pipes.
Another concern I would have would be scale buildup over the years.
Depending on the water it could eventually plug the pipes.
|
4.567 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Jan 07 1992 15:01 | 11 |
| re: .499
I don't think you'd have to worry about scale buildup; the same
water just keeps recirculating, so once any deposits have settled
out that's it. Of course, one has to keep adding minimal water
every so often as it's drained from the system for one reason or
another (yearly boiler maintenace, for instance) but I can't see
ever getting enough deposits to matter.
I am, however, leery of the "sealed in concrete forever with
no way to fix it short of a jackhammer" technique of building.
|
4.568 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 07 1992 16:19 | 4 |
4.569 | | SSBN1::YANKES | | Tue Jan 07 1992 19:25 | 13 |
|
Re: .496
>A few years ago, every one was saying the same thing about plastic
>waste and waterpipes that were (omigosh) *glued* together.
Yup, you're right. And frankly, when plastic piping was as
relatively new as is this type of heating system, I wouldn't have
wanted to use it either! I don't like that "guinea pig" feeling and
one example of something new that worked out well (ie. the plastic
piping) doesn't mean that the next new thing will work out as well.
-craig
|
4.570 | | TOKLAS::feldman | Larix decidua, var. decify | Tue Jan 07 1992 19:26 | 10 |
| Hmm. My college dorm had radiant heat with flagstone floors (yes, flagstone).
It was about 10 years old when I was in it. Never had any problems
while I was there. I don't know how it's held up since. I'm assuming
it was hot water, although I suppose it's possible that it was electric.
There were also sidewalk heaters, because the sloping part of the flagstone
walk was pretty treacherous when iced over. These had frequent problems,
which I would attribute to the freeze/thaw cycles.
Gary
|
4.571 | my latest invention :-) | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Is the electric chair UL approved? | Wed Jan 08 1992 00:20 | 15 |
| Would this work? Just below the subfloor have copper pipe attached to a piece
of sheet metal that goes between the joists. Below this have some
IR-reflective insulation, and below this normal fiberglass insulation.
If a leak occurs, it's (reasonably) accessible for repairs, and you don't have
to destroy the whole floor to find/repair the leak.
-Mike
============================= subfloor
|X|----O----|X|----O----|X| O=pipe, - is metal
|X|_________|X|_________|X| reflective layer
|X|#########|X|#########|X| fiberglass
|X|#########|X|#########|X|
^
L__ Floor joist
|
4.572 | | MANTHN::EDD | I been shattered (shay-oo-bee) | Wed Jan 08 1992 10:40 | 6 |
| I don't see anything acting as thermal mass in -.1.
The cement is what appears to actually make the system work, by
absorbing the heat from the pipes and evenly distributing it.
Edd
|
4.573 | I don't like jackhammers | HPSRAD::HOWARTH | | Wed Jan 08 1992 10:58 | 24 |
| re: .492 & 496-
Radiant heating is not new. What is new and what I questioned
regarding reliability is the use of plastic pipe buried in
concrete. My comment regarding reliability made in .492 was based on
engineering reasons related to thermal limits verses expected
life for the plastic tubing.
If the water temperature in the heating system is kept low, the
plastic will probably have a high life expectancy. But, thermal
energy transfer is governed by the temperature differences
between a thermal source and the thermal sink. If those differences
are not large, neither will be the thermal energy transfer. For
example, the floor temperature may be 80 degrees but the water
temperature in the pipe may have to be 180 degrees in order to
maintain the floor temperature. Typically, a heating system will
be operated with an upper temperature of about 200 degrees
because most homes have a marginal amount of radiation available
to transfer heat from the system to the environment.
Good luck to people who buy property that uses this method for
heating--
Joe
|
4.574 | this ain't garden hose material | WUMBCK::FOX | | Wed Jan 08 1992 11:38 | 14 |
| re .-1
The current material being used is not new - just in the US. It's
big in Europe, Netherlands, etc. The reason they use plastic vs.
metal is that copper and concrete don't mix! RFH used copper in the
50's and it was a disaster. The point of using the material they
use now is for this specific application. Copper was used because,
well, it was available. Obviously no consideration was made for
reliability, as the inevitable chemical reaction certainly was
no secret.
My feeling is that if it's working in the rest of the world, I
assume they took into consideration temperature requirements for
thermal transfer, etc, and made it work.
John
|
4.575 | The 'ole NIH Syndrome 8^) | SYORPD::DEEP | Bob Deep @SYO, DTN 256-5708 | Wed Jan 08 1992 13:33 | 0 |
4.576 | how to add risk to your new renovations | HPSRAD::HOWARTH | | Wed Jan 08 1992 13:48 | 27 |
| Re: -1
I didn't want to get carried away with my last response so I
chose not to get into the issues of copper and concrete. You are
absolutely correct about copper being a disaster when buried in
concrete. There were numerous home constructed in the Framingham
area that used that type of heating system construction. Many of
them failed and were replaced with base board radiators rather
than try to repair an un-repairable system.
But, because copper doesn't work, does that mean that plastic
will? Everything in life has a predictable death even heating
systems. If one operates plastic near the upper design
temperature limits, it will have an early failure. As I said
earlier, that problem can be minimized by operating with a water
temperature that won't compromise the predicted life of the
plastic. BUT--- the heating system for the ENTIRE house must be
designed to operate at that temperature OR the system won't be
able to maintain room comfortable temperatures when the outside
temperature is cold (0-20 degrees?). I referring to the other
rooms in the building that have normal radiators.
Another way of lowering the temperature in the plastic loop
involves complicated temperature controlling via manifolds.
Again, I wish those who use this approach good luck--
Joe
|
4.577 | and cool in summer too... | AKOCOA::CWALTERS | | Wed Jan 08 1992 13:52 | 23 |
| RE 498:
> In most homes you find either hardwood floors or carpeting. This type
> of heating systems dosn't work to well with this type of flooring.
I thought we had to have hardwood & carpets because the floor was so
bleed'n cold! :-)
There might be another benefit to this type of heating - I've noticed
that in Mediterranean countries the rooms feel a lot cooler in summer,
which I attributed to be a result of having terracotta tiled floors
rather than wood or carpet. It's certainly a lot nicer to walk around
barefoot on a cool tile floor when it's 90 outside. Might just be a
psy effect, but it could save on the cost of running an airconditioner
too.
(That's the only way you'll convince a diehard traditionalist skeptic
yankee - tell him he'll save a few dollars.)
Regards,
Colin
|
4.578 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 08 1992 13:56 | 8 |
| Once again we see plastic getting a bad rap. Saying that plastic is
unreliable is like saying that the Japanese make junk. Like anything
else, one needs to choose the right material for the application.
There are many high temperature plastics out there that do quite well
in pipe applications. There are medical applications where plastics
must undergo repeated autoclaving. Many advances have been made in the
last 20 years to help predict the life of plastics under use.
Accellerated testing has also come a long way.
|
4.579 | | WUMBCK::FOX | | Wed Jan 08 1992 15:17 | 11 |
| re .509
>systems. If one operates plastic near the upper design
>temperature limits, it will have an early failure.
If this tubing was developed strictly for RFH, don't you suppose
they thought of that? I can't imagine all the technology that
went into this material overlooked the primary purpose - to be
reliable! Do you think an industry would stake it's future
on something that would fail in 5 years?
John
|
4.580 | AUTO MANUFACTURERS? 8-) | CVG::ESONIS | What now? | Wed Jan 08 1992 16:28 | 8 |
| <<< Note 1974.512 by WUMBCK::FOX >>>
>Do you think an industry would stake it's future
>on something that would fail in 5 years?
YES.....
|
4.581 | | WUMBCK::FOX | | Wed Jan 08 1992 17:04 | 1 |
| Good point, however this stuff is imported. :-)
|
4.582 | protection of the tiles | UTRUST::VANHULST | | Thu Jan 09 1992 04:41 | 12 |
| In most cases people here will use it as an additional heating source
to remove the "cold" feeling of a tile floor in winter time.
The water temperature will not be higher than 100 F, not only to
protect the plastic tube but also not to damage the tile floor.
(cracks)
The temperature of the floor will be raised by a couple of degrees,just
to give a comfortable feeling. If the temperature is getting higher
it will not be comfortable anymore, special at places where you have
to stand ,like the kitchen area
h.
|
4.583 | how cost-effective is the heated floor? | CADSYS::CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Thu Jan 09 1992 11:26 | 9 |
| I hardly ever wander around my house barefoot anyhow, so I guess I
wouldn't notice if a tile floor is warm or cool underfoot, only that it
is harder than carpeting. So, what I was wondering is how the costs of
running one of these radiant-heat-floor systems compares, in an area
like New England where you need significant heating during a large
portion of the year, to other kinds of heating systems in convential
buildings, such as forced hot air systems?
/Charlotte
|
4.584 | | WUMBCK::FOX | | Thu Jan 09 1992 12:18 | 5 |
| TOH has put RFH in a good portion of their NE houses. I recall him
saying it is cheaper to run than baseboard or FHA, especially with
cathedral ceilings.
John
|
4.585 | You see silhouettes in the window | JOKUR::BASBAL::FALKOF | | Fri Jan 10 1992 11:15 | 5 |
| I think the family is living there now and they have a nice American
flag flying from the front portico. The fence along the street (Rt 20)
looks new and painted. IMO, it fits in nicely along that side of the
street, but now something should be done to the police station on the
other side ;-)
|
4.586 | My dad used RFH 30 years ago | JOKUR::SMC005::LASLOCKY | | Wed Jan 15 1992 15:54 | 10 |
| About 30 years ago my father added a room on the house and used radient
heat in it. the room had a lot of glass but was always warm. We
always liked to use the room and it was nice on a cold snowy day to
look out the windows and have your feet nice and warm. My dad never
had a problem with the heat. He finally sold the property 18 years
later. The added benefit from this was that the room underneath was
as warm as the room above. As someone said earlier the floor was
always cool in the summer.
Bob
|
4.587 | | OAW::MILLER | | Fri Jan 24 1992 21:19 | 11 |
4.588 | New Season woes | USPMLO::GILLIGAN | I'm Spartacus | Fri Mar 06 1992 12:49 | 6 |
| Caught the London rehab for the first time last night. Looks like they
have another budget fiasco on their hands, although I'm not sure it's
TOH's fault.
-brian
|
4.589 | Lets see Steve, Norm, Rich - next the stone cutter has to go over! | IMPINK::mccarthy | DECTPU - how can I hook tpu into xnotes :-) | Fri Mar 06 1992 14:22 | 10 |
| Why in the world did they have to go to England?
The entire show has lost its 'down to basics', here is how 'joe and jane
homeowner' can make there house a little better.
As for the budget - I knew it was going to be blown as soon as I saw the
contractor put up all that staging and roofing OVER the entire house they were
working on - then all the steel beams - yikes !!
Brian
|
4.590 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Mar 06 1992 16:46 | 10 |
| I happened to see the show too - first time in quite a while. My
main question: *WHY* are they in trouble with the planning commission,
or whatever the name of the UK bureaucracy is? Stuff like getting
necessary permits and approvals - that's basic Contracting 101,
whether in the USA or England or anyplace. The English contractors
should certainly have known enough to check up on that. It's routine.
They had the same sort of trouble with the Concord, Mass., barn
project. I think they've had it on other projects too. Don't they
ever learn?
|
4.591 | | KOALA::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Fri Mar 06 1992 17:43 | 12 |
|
Steve,
I can understand their problem in England. They probably didn't the
know the law, and were relying on the people over there who they were
working with to take car of everything.
As for the one in Concord Mass, well there wasn't a problem. It was
just one lady who complained, and the town threw the case out. I think
the people form TOH did everything they were suppose to.
Mike
|
4.592 | Massive taxes | VIA::SUNG | Live Free or Live in MA | Sat Mar 07 1992 00:23 | 6 |
| Regarding the budget woes, did you hear that the homeowners have to
pay something like a 12% value added tax for all goods and services!
The show at least gives the flavor and terminology of building in
England although it has strayed from the D-I-Y ideology.
-al
|
4.593 | | CELTIK::JACOB | | Wed Mar 11 1992 00:45 | 5 |
| not to nit, but the VAT(value added tax) on the goods and services is
over 17% in England.
JaKe
|
4.594 | D-I-Y... What's that? | STRATA::JOERILEY | Everyone Can Dream... | Wed Mar 11 1992 05:47 | 9 |
| RE:.525
> although it has strayed from the D-I-Y ideology.
Strayed isn't the word for it. I don't watch the show regularly
anymore because of it.
Joe
|
4.595 | Howabout that Norm? | XK120::SHURSKY | If you want gold, don't gather wool. | Wed Mar 11 1992 11:50 | 5 |
| Hey, is this the new svelte Norm? I haven't seen the show in ages but Norm
looks like he has reduced the design specifications on that front baywindow
on which he has been so diligently working.
Stan
|
4.596 | Carpenter was like a kid at Xmas... | DEMON::CHALMERS | NOT the mama... | Wed Mar 11 1992 12:45 | 9 |
| Got a kick out of the show a few weeks ago where Norm introduced
the British carpenters to his wonderful nail gun...After Norm's lesson,
as the camera panned away, there's the foreman blasting away, driving a
whole bunch of 10P nails into an old post.
And yes, seeing that roof blown out was amazing, especially since the
people on the second or third floor flat are into the finish-work phase
of their renovations. If they don't get that place weather-tight soon,
there's bound to be some angry people downstairs.
|
4.597 | | MANTHN::EDD | I refuse to talk to myself | Wed Mar 11 1992 14:18 | 11 |
| re: budget
One can only wonder if ALL the owner's tastes run in the same vein
as the mondo-bux kitchen they've fallen in love with...
Floors hung from the ceiling??
I love Norm's reaction as he entered the gutted flat for the first
time..."You blew the place apart. YOU BLEW THE PLACE APART!!!!"
Edd
|
4.598 | it is a show you know | TLE::MCCARTHY | Is it Spring yet? | Wed Mar 11 1992 15:40 | 6 |
| >> I love Norm's reaction as he entered the gutted flat for the first
>> time..."You blew the place apart. YOU BLEW THE PLACE APART!!!!"
With the director yelling 'hey Norm, when you come through the door say
"you blew the place apart"' and ......ready.......and rolling.....and action!
|
4.599 | I like the stuff TOH is doing | DTIF::FRIDAY | CDA: The Holodeck of the future | Wed Mar 11 1992 18:47 | 7 |
| I guess I'm in the minority regarding what I think is suitable TOH
material. I find it quite interesting to watch huge expensive
renovation projects, and the one being done in London is quite
interesting as well.
I look at TOH as something akin to science-fiction; it doesn't really
pertain to the world we live in, but it's still a lot of fun.
|
4.600 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Fri Mar 13 1992 12:41 | 30 |
| Having lived near London for many years, I can well understand how the
budget would get blown to smithereens before the first nail hit. When
each owner in the building is responsible for the structure of his part
of the building totally independent of everybody else, the potential
for over-runs is phenomenal just to cover your self for potential
damage you might cause to anyone else. The trades in England are all
*very* expensive. The other thing about VAT is sheer stupidity ...
but I can see how it would happen. Most goods and services you run
across in day to day live are all sticker priced to include the 17%,
but there are some trades that price their services excluding VAT and
the fact that VAT is extra is in "the fine print". And they quote
based on the VAT exclusive price.
The planning problems are not in the least unusual. Whatever happened
they knew that the roof structures etc would have to be worked on,
whatever they did to the outside facade. The planning permission is
for the facade, and the timescales tend to get a little stretched out.
This is all totally normal though ... just a little different.
As for the designer kitchens ... sheer extravagance. They couldn't
have picked a more expensive place to shop for a kitchen --- even a
custom cabinetmaker's kitchen would probably be cheaper! The place
they went has a name and you PAY PAY PAY PAY for the name ... not to
mention that you PAY for their showroom too!
It's definitely time for a trip to the real world of a real world
kitchen supplier ... like Marley (yeah, the same people that make
roofing tiles).
Stuart
|
4.601 | | IMTDEV::BRUNO | Father Gregory | Sat Mar 14 1992 20:32 | 4 |
| Yipe! Steve asked what the price was for the thatched roof they were
repairing/installing, and got 16K pounds for an answer. I need a raise.
Greg
|
4.602 | London flat still not completed | SPNDZY::HICKS | Congress - a hole in the moral ozone | Fri May 01 1992 18:26 | 8 |
| For anyone interested, my neighbor had lunch with Norm a couple of
weeks ago when he was at Hammar Hardware in Nashua. He asked Norm
about the London flat and Norm said they had further problems with the
planning commission and the steel beam and that things hadn't
progressed much beyond where it was during the filming of the last
show. The owners lease on the place they rented during the
construction had run out and they had to move to another location. I
would not want to be in their shoes!!
|
4.603 | | MANTHN::EDD | Real programs in DCL? .NOT.! | Fri May 01 1992 18:45 | 5 |
| ...and, moving back to a previous show, I saw that the "Old Wetherbee
Farm" (yuppie couple, Bob Villa, big deck on back. Remember?) was to
be sold at auction by the mortgage holder.
Edd
|
4.604 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Is the electric chair UL approved? | Fri May 01 1992 18:59 | 3 |
| Is this the barn in Concord that they "renovated" (read tore down and rebuilt)?
-Mike
|
4.605 | | MANTHN::EDD | Real programs in DCL? .NOT.! | Fri May 01 1992 19:48 | 10 |
| Nope. It's the old farm house that needed a corner replaced due to
water damage. They pulled down the extension on the back of the house
and most of the show centered around that.
They went WAY over budget on the place. I remember Villa's comment when
they found they were $200K (?) over...
"Yeah, well, that happens..."
Edd
|
4.606 | | MANTHN::EDD | Real programs in DCL? .NOT.! | Fri May 01 1992 19:52 | 3 |
| By the way - .0 in this string is about the same place...
Edd
|
4.607 | Be interesting to see what it brings in auction given the $ spent | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Is the electric chair UL approved? | Fri May 01 1992 20:26 | 3 |
| OK I think I know that one. I only saw bits and pieces of that one.
-Mike
|
4.608 | | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Tue May 05 1992 19:15 | 3 |
| I think this was the one where the owner sued. I wonder if he collected?
Larry
|
4.609 | | GIAMEM::RIDGE | the trouble w/you is the trouble w/me | Wed May 06 1992 17:18 | 3 |
| The Wetherbee house is just off rt128 East St exit, one exit south of rt 1
Norwood/Dedham. It's been for sale for a while now. I go by it once in a
while.
|
4.610 | | KOALA::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Wed May 06 1992 17:52 | 5 |
| From my recollection of that show, they had about $100k of donated
materials and labor. I suspect that they may make a profit in the sale
of this house.
Mike
|
4.611 | | MANTHN::EDD | It's not *Manhattan*... | Wed May 06 1992 20:34 | 3 |
| Who'd want a Vila'd house?
Edd
|
4.612 | Another TOH | HELIX::HOLTORF | | Wed May 27 1992 18:31 | 4 |
| Saw an article in the Boston Globe last week that TOH was looking for
a family house to redo. Well, I sent in my name and pictures. I'll let
you know what comes of it. Don't panic, I read and heed notes.
Mary
|
4.613 | | REGENT::WOODWARD | I'll put this moment...here | Tue Nov 03 1992 17:31 | 5 |
| Where is the house that they're filming now? It's a tiny ranch,
but they're going to convert it to a French Chateau, by the looks of
architect's mock up.
Kathy
|
4.614 | let your fingers do the walking | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Tue Nov 03 1992 19:23 | 4 |
| It's in Lexington. I found their name in the phone book, but I don't
remember the address. My foggy memory says Parker St.
Dave.
|
4.615 | Location is Everything. | REGENT::WOODWARD | I'll put this moment...here | Wed Nov 04 1992 12:10 | 2 |
| Oh. I figured it had to be a yuppie town when they said the house
was recently appraised for $225K.
|
4.616 | cherry paneling | MARX::FLEMING | fifty-seven notefiles & no new notes | Fri Feb 19 1993 13:47 | 6 |
| In last nights episode (2/18/92) they were in the process of putting
up cherry paneling on the lower parts of a wall. He mentioned that
for $138 a sheet it was a bargain. It did look pretty good. Anyone
know where, in the greater Maynard area, that paneling can be found?
Thanks,
John
|
4.617 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Fri Feb 19 1993 15:11 | 7 |
| I'm not sure $4.30/square foot is a bargain for cherry....
Not sure where I'd look for it, but there's a big lumberyard
called Deal's, I think in Waltham (?) that might be worth
checking. There's also Violette's (?) Plywood in Lunenberg (?)
that carries specialty plywood.
|
4.618 | | BREAK::COTE | | Fri Feb 19 1993 23:14 | 4 |
| That $4.30/ft cherry had some pretty interesting millwork, raised
panels and such.
Edd
|
4.619 | Pronounced the same, though ... | PACKED::PIC9::allen | Christopher Allen, DEC COBOL, ZKO 381-0864 | Tue Feb 23 1993 18:48 | 3 |
| By the way, that's "Diehl's", and it's in Wellesley. They have a lot of
stuff (like finish plywood) that many other yards closer to where I live
don't have. It's worth a call: Wellesley 235-1530; Natick 653-0170.
|
4.620 | | 17576::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Wed Feb 24 1993 15:44 | 6 |
| The longer the show is on, the more it gets away from it's original
premise.
I can remember when one of the PRIME concerns was meeting the budget.
Lee
|
4.621 | | 27748::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Feb 24 1993 16:17 | 3 |
| The show is a MAJOR disappoint.
Marc H.
|
4.622 | home improvement show junkies unite | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Wed Feb 24 1993 18:53 | 19 |
| Yes, this last project of TOH went overboard again.
The only interesting thing to me was how they attempted to recover
from the disaster in finishing the basement floor concrete.
Hometime is getting boring too.... I think I'm beginning to suffer
home improvement show burnout. At least the Hometime crew lightens
up from time to time with some humor.
I try to watch Bob Villa's show (Sunday @ noon on Channel 4) but often
forget, or it gets bumped by some sporting event. I don't understand
why they don't publize that show better or tell us about a re-broadcast
timeslot. (danged if I'm going to call a Sears 900 number!)
I tuned in on the middle of an episode a week ago, and Bob had just
stopped in on Tim Allen! I missed what was going on though. Otherwise
they are winding up a total rehab of a California beach house.
Dave.
|
4.623 | | MARX::FLEMING | fifty-seven notefiles & no new notes | Wed Feb 24 1993 19:28 | 6 |
| Usually on TOH they do a rundown on what the final tally
of costs were and how much they went over budget. Did they
do that this time? I must have missed it. I expected it
in the last episode but not a peep. I really loved the
house but it must have cost them a mint.
John
|
4.624 | Might as well buy do-it-yourself books. | ROULET::JOERILEY | Everyone can dream... | Thu Feb 25 1993 07:46 | 11 |
| RE:.553
> I can remember when one of the PRIME concerns was meeting the budget.
I thought the original idea for the show was to show homeowners how
they might do some repairs on their own homes. Now unless they have 100
grand or better to hire all kinds of contractors you might as well
forget it. As far as I'm concerned the show fell in one of the septic
systems it replaced once and never came up for air.
Joe
|
4.625 | Tell norm to go make a planter next time | 20438::MCCARTHY | but I kept rolling off the couch | Thu Feb 25 1993 09:50 | 19 |
| A bit off the topic of this note but yes it appears there is no longer a show
that shows "joe mechanicly inclined" how to add a new light or finish a
second floor - ON A BUDGET WITHOUT GIFTS FROM EVERY SUPPLIER IN TOWN.
Back to basics -
1) a real budget
2) DETAILS - oh thats nice, they put cement backer board on the floor - why?
How did they deal with the seams....
3) Tell Norm and the other contractor to take a hike on this one - let Steve
and the home owner try to figure it out from books :-)
re: a few back:
No summary was given on the final costs - I watched the wrap up show
and don't think I missed any part of it.
They are going to Florida next to help put together a house that was ripped
apart by Hurricane ???? (I was never good with names!).
bjm
|
4.626 | | MANTHN::EDD | The keyword is survival... | Thu Feb 25 1993 09:58 | 6 |
| > ...ripped apart by Hurricaine ???? (Never was good with names)
Hurricaine Trethewey. It starts in the basement and rips out only
the heating system, leaving a radiant floor in its' wake.
Edd
|
4.627 | Home Again | SQM::MCFARLAND | | Thu Feb 25 1993 12:26 | 14 |
| I've been watching Bob Villa on Sunday mornings at either 8:00 or 8:30
AM on A & E. They are redoing a Chicago house. They have been going
over the budget on every show. They are getting close to finishing up.
It appears that they are very close to budget on this one.
This is a different version of the show than they have on at noon
on Sunday on one of the Boston affiliates (channel 4 or 5). This
one I have not watched every week but it appears that they are remodeling
the house in California to be similar to the Smart House that is
discussed in another note here. The 2 segments with Tim Allen were
quite funny.
Judie
|
4.628 | I saw that one | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Thu Feb 25 1993 12:52 | 15 |
| RE: .560 Home Again in Chicago
If it's a brownstone type of affair, where their stripping paint off
some brick, that's an old episode. Not suprizing that it would show up
on cable then.... but then I don't get cable.
So far, Bob's projects have been a bit more down to earth, and they
have attempted to keep the budget "public". This California house is
one of the biggest so far. But sort of expected for the neighborhood
that they were going to put some significant money into it.
Unfortunately I keep missing the timeslot. Maybe I need a VCR with
multiple weekly programs and tapes... or just a bunch of VCRs....
Dave.
|
4.629 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Thu Feb 25 1993 12:57 | 4 |
| Home again is true to the original "This old House" format.
Not a bad show at all!
Marc H.
|
4.630 | My 2 cents | CADSYS::FLEECE::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie | Thu Feb 25 1993 14:10 | 26 |
| >> They have been going
>> over the budget on every show. They are getting close to finishing up.
>> It appears that they are very close to budget on this one.
Tell me a remodeling project that doesn't go over budget! There's always
something that was forgotten when the budget was made. Heck, you can even go
over budget if you lose a box of sheetrock screws, and you have to buy a second
one! Don't ask me why I know that!
Cost differences are more obvious when you are doing it yourself. If you can get
something cheaper, you smile and pat yourself on the back, thinking you are
going to be under budget. But when you have to pay more than you planned for
something, there's no contractor to eat the cost!
So, cost-wise,
1. When doing it yourself, some things will cause less than you expected
and some things will cost more, but the overall cost of the project
will be between 5% and 10% more than you thought
and
2. The probability that the project will be over budget is directly
porportional to the size of the project.
Elaine
|
4.631 | | DWOVAX::EROS | Cardinals in '93 | Thu Feb 25 1993 14:57 | 13 |
| re: .559
>> ...ripped apart by Hurricaine ???? (Never was good with names)
>
> Hurricaine Trethewey. It starts in the basement and rips out only
> the heating system, leaving a radiant floor in its wake.
>
> Edd
That's great - I just about fell off my chair when I read this!
-- Tony
|
4.632 | They rebuilt the show along the way . . . | MVDS02::LOCKRIDGE | Artificial Insanity | Thu Feb 25 1993 15:22 | 10 |
| I enjoy This Old (Expensive) House, not for the original intent which
was given up LONG ago, but as the showcase it's become for all the new
whiz-bang gadgets and technology and the visits to the supplier of the
week's factory. Not that I'll ever be able to afford any of this
stuff, but I find it interesting.
The show might be better titled "What's new in expensive home
reconstruction with your hosts Click and Clack" (oops wrong show) :-).
-Bob
|
4.633 | Different Show but still interesting | SQM::MCFARLAND | | Thu Feb 25 1993 16:52 | 14 |
| .565 I'm with you. I love watching this show as well as the other one
with Norm Abrams making the furniture. It's interesting to see all the
new gadgets and decorating ideas that are out there. On This Old
Expensive House I also find it interesting to see all the choices and
changes that come about after the original plan.
From the Lexington house, the one that jumps out at me is that the
home owner was very happy with the old kitchen, (obviously, does not
spend much time there) the place was a bit small and 60's ish
but low and behold there is a new kitchen with all the wiz bang gadgets
that most probably were donated.
Judie
|
4.634 | | PACKED::PIC9::allen | Christopher Allen, DEC COBOL, ZKO 381-0864 | Thu Feb 25 1993 17:52 | 7 |
| Does anyone know anything about the neighborhood the Lexington house was built
in? Judging by the quick glimpses of the adjacent houses during the shows,
they've turned a little ranch house which fit in, agewise, with the surrounding
colonials and neighborhood, into a monstrosity which sticks out like a sore
thumb. I wish the owners well when they go to sell ...
-Chris Allen
|
4.635 | | MANTHN::EDD | The keyword is survival... | Thu Feb 25 1993 18:07 | 4 |
| The first show showed the neighborhood. It (the neighborhood) seemed to
be able to support most, if not all, of the "new" house...
Edd
|
4.636 | probably ok | TUXEDO::MOLSON | | Thu Feb 25 1993 18:08 | 24 |
| I believe it is in an area called "the manor", which was part of the
Parker School (now condos) district. The manor once had victorians,
during the 50s the land around the big houses was sold off for
and ranches and fake colonials built around them.
There was a discussion of the neighborhood and price levels in one of
the early shows. The idea was to upgrade the house to the high end
of the neighborhood. I have not looked at this house in the flesh,
but off hand I would say the achieved that goal.
Also, Lexington is a very desireable town. The price of a house lot (if
there are any left) is quite high. I bet almost any Lexington ranch
would support this kind of upgrade.
Personally, I do not want to live in a subdivision, or something that
looks like one. Boring. I know, I'm wierd - a subdvision seems to be
many people's definition of "neighborhood". If you look round, you
will discover that it is not necessary (but certainly easier) to buy
an old house if you want to live in an area with character.
Margaret.
(I grew up in Lexington, and went to the Parker School for 1/2 of first
grade).
|
4.637 | "ok" is about right | SQM::TRUMPLER | Help prevent truth decay. | Thu Feb 25 1993 18:30 | 6 |
| The house is on Bertwell Ave, number x (15<x<20). I looked the
Igo[e]s up once, out of curiosity.
Nice neighborhood, but it gets some noise from 128 and Hanscom.
>Mark (I house-hunted there last year)
|
4.638 | An eyesore | CNTROL::KING | | Thu Feb 25 1993 18:42 | 10 |
| The house is 17 Bertwell Ave. It is right off Rt128. I think it looks very
out of place. I went and checked it out last weekend. You can see
exactly how they left it after the last show. Complete with dumpster.
The electrician (?) was there when I went by. Knowing what the inside
looks like and the money poured into it, I find it very hard to believe
they will come anywhere close to recouping their investment. I remember
when they advertised that they when looking for a ranch to blow out the
roof on, one of the stipulations was that you had to have the money to
do it. I don't know how much the Igoes were paying, but I would expect
they picked up the majority.
|
4.639 | | FREBRD::POEGEL | Garry Poegel | Thu Feb 25 1993 18:53 | 19 |
|
>> <<< Note 1974.571 by CNTROL::KING >>>
>> -< An eyesore >-
>> The house is 17 Bertwell Ave. It is right off Rt128. I think it looks very
>> out of place. I went and checked it out last weekend. You can see
On one of the early shows, the Igoes said they paid around $250K for the
house and they had budgeted around $150K for the renovation. I suspect
they got more than their money's worth with all the donations. I like alot
of things about the house, but I didn't like the kitchen design. It ended
up with a balcony that overlooked part of the kitchen and I'd rather see
the kitchen separated a bit more from that really nice great room.
They put alot of expensive extras into that house. The master bath shower
enclosure was a custom job that I think they said cost $1600 - just for
the enclosure!
Garry
|
4.640 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Fri Feb 26 1993 09:53 | 8 |
| I caught the start of the new TOH show last night, the one in Florida
which was damaged by the hurricane.
The owner wants to restore it to what he called a "Florida" home.
Bring it back to what it was when he grew up there. He has a budget of
$65K. It will be interesting to see what happens in this regard.
Lee
|
4.641 | Directions to the Igo house | SQM::MCFARLAND | | Fri Feb 26 1993 12:51 | 9 |
| To anyone who knows how to find the Igo house.
I want to go and check it out and will be in the area tomorrow.
Could someone provide directions from RTE 128? What exit the 2A one?
And once you exit 128 where do you go?
Judie
|
4.642 | | CNTROL::KING | | Fri Feb 26 1993 13:24 | 3 |
| Get off at the 4-225 exit heading toward Lexington. Take a left at the
first light and Bertwell is a couple of streets down. Bertwell runs
left and right, take a right.
|
4.643 | Also visit the Victory Garden | MR4DEC::BBARRY | | Fri Feb 26 1993 15:08 | 14 |
| While end the neighborhood go see "The Victory Garden." If you use
these directions go past the Igoes house, and turn left at the intersection.
At the first rotary you run into, there will be Lexington Gardens. WGBH
moved Victory Garden here about 6 years ago.
Brian
<<< Note 1974.575 by CNTROL::KING >>>
Get off at the 4-225 exit heading toward Lexington. Take a left at the
first light and Bertwell is a couple of streets down. Bertwell runs
left and right, take a right.
|
4.644 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 02 1993 15:25 | 2 |
| Marc H., you seem to be living "This Old House". Why would you want to
watch it too? ;^)
|
4.645 | Right On | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Mar 02 1993 16:19 | 6 |
| RE: .577
You got that right! I just look around my home to see a project that
went way over budget and "out of control!".
Marc H.
|
4.646 | Bob V. finally put in his place. | MARX::SULLIVAN | We have met the enemy,and they is us! | Fri Mar 05 1993 15:57 | 26 |
| I watch all three shows (TOH, Home Again, and Hometime) whenever I can remember
they are on. In the past, I have shared some of the complaints stated here. But
I've changed my opinion a bit.
I enjoy TOH, especially when they do some of the off-the-wall stuff they do. It
keeps it interesting. I may think it's crazy, or never have the chance/money/desire
to do what they are showing, but it's interesting none the less.
I too fine HOMETIME becoming boring. I always enjoyed this show because in many
cases they would take the time to show you the steps required to do a job. But...
How many times can they show a tiling job before it starts to become boring
and repetitious? Or a framing job? Or a deck job? ...
Of the three, I do think that Home Again has stayed closest to the original
intent of TOH. However, Bob V. still has the same problems as always. He
rushes through/skips the important details, interrupts like crazy, and
remains the pompus windbag he always was. If he had interrupted the Mexican
tile manufacturing manager one more time... But, in the same show I finally
saw someone who could get the upper hand on him. He brought in an interior
designer "friend" who put him in his place. She constantly interrupted him and
took charge of that portion of the show. They showed her taking him to a
fabric store to pick out fabric for the house. You could tell he was a bit
nervous about what she and the fabric guy were demonstrating. First time I've
ever seen him look intimidated.
Mark
|
4.647 | TOH as a fantasy example | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Mon Mar 08 1993 19:24 | 26 |
| I think one of the reasons that has lead TO(E)H into this state
is that in order to make things interesting, they try to drag in
stete-of-the-art, and gee-whiz features, and this leads to the
damn-the-budget-its-all-donations-anyways attitude.
They are trying to lift the projects above the mundane, but it ends up
making them fantasy remodelling, where you really shouldnt expect a
real-world project to include everything they did done. You have to
relax and admire things as best-of examples.
Hometime stays with the basics, but if they could stop glossing over
some of the interesting problem solving, it would keep my interest
longer.
One of the episodes that sticks in my mind, was when Dean screwed up
a rafter order, by mis-measuring the slope of the existing roof.
The solution was ingenious, and not that difficult. It helps to see
them fixing problems that help keep the gotchas under control.
Bob Villa doesn't bother me. But his "script" is actually very
repetitive and predicable. It was fun to see an episode of TOH where
the homeowner really picked up on his patter and started playing it
out herself with the contracters. Key phrases: "How does that work?"
"Can you show us?" "What does that mean?"...
Dave.
|
4.648 | gives SO's expensive ideas :-) | 20438::MCCARTHY | but I kept rolling off the couch | Tue Mar 09 1993 11:25 | 5 |
| I was upset to see that on the last house they re-did, my wife picked out the
same toilet for our second floor that they installed - she has some expensive
tastes - thank God she does not like cherry paneling ;-)
bjm
|
4.649 | How to impress your neighbors | MVDS02::LOCKRIDGE | Artificial Insanity | Wed Mar 10 1993 15:04 | 9 |
| One of the things that bothers me about the current project is, that if
*I* were a home owner who'd been waiting months to get my roof fixed,
front wall put back and plumbing repaired, I'd be rather upset to be
told, "well, the work was scheduled for next week, but we can't do it
for another month because we have to work on This Old House." While
it is great for the owner of the house being "featured", I think it is
most unfair to the area homeowners that don't have the clout.
-Bob
|
4.650 | The House in Homestead is Done! | REGENT::WOODWARD | I'll put this moment...here | Fri Apr 02 1993 17:35 | 7 |
| Welp, TOH finished up another project! The Florida house looked
really nice.
They said they spent $75,000 and got another $70-80,000 in
donations.
|
4.651 | hooked up or "put in place" | 2303::MCCARTHY | but I kept rolling off the couch | Mon Apr 05 1993 10:26 | 8 |
| I saw the last show.... as Steve walks throught where they put the washer and
dryer he says "...and the washer and dryer have been delivered and are all
hooked up" as I see the washer supply lines unconnected in the back....
How much of that stuff was dragged out after the cameras left? They did not
mention any photo shoot this time...
bjm
|
4.652 | too much or too fast? | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Mon Apr 05 1993 18:01 | 9 |
| Yeah! I also noticed the unconnected washer faucet/drain box.
And it was a kick to see the kitchen designer warn Steve not to touch
anything as it was still wet paint.
This is the second series where it seems that they are in a big rush
to get done on time. Are they trying to cram too much in a series?
or did they try to fit two series into one season?
Dave.
|
4.653 | losing touch, Hometime more realistic.. | WLW::TURCOTTE | That's it-your all still in trouble. | Mon Apr 05 1993 18:10 | 20 |
|
They really blew through the last two episodes, the show could really
benefit going to an hour format, so that they could spend a little more
time on techniques, instead of just saying "we did this and we did
that", the reason they get so many donations is because its considered
an advertising expense by the companys, but when the show asks a few
questions, and moves on you have to wonder how effective an advertising
tool it really is.
Anyway the owner got a great makeover for $75,000
when the actual price was over $150,000 , if I could get them to do
that for me, I'd jump at the chance.
Steve
PS, they hinted that the next series would be an old Victorian, and that
they would be using older period techniques, but I'm sure they will
continue to "throw money" at whatever house they choose, whether its a
deep pocketed owner, or massive donations.
|
4.654 | Home Time just a hollywood type production | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, DECnet/OSI | Mon Apr 05 1993 19:01 | 8 |
| > Title: losing touch, Hometime more realistic..
Hmm, HomeTime more realistic? That's another show that has
gone down hill. They always pretend the two actors are
married (Dean's on like his 3rd marriage in 2 years?), and
the wasted air time with those skits as Dean as Hurcules,
and Dean playing the role as the dumb guy really turns me
off. And to find out those two don't even do any of the work ....
|
4.655 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Apr 06 1993 12:21 | 5 |
| RE: .587
"don't do any of the work?" Can you explain?
Marc H.
|
4.656 | Quirky little show in its own way | RAGMOP::T_PARMENTER | Human. All too human. | Tue Apr 06 1993 12:42 | 3 |
| I don't think they claim they're married. I think they leave it
delightfully ambiguous.
|
4.657 | presentation angle | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Tue Apr 06 1993 15:34 | 8 |
| I think it became clear in the "Joanne's last show" that they were a
bit annoyed with how much attention people seem to pay to the pretend
relationship. They are really actors to a certain extent, (unlike
Bob V, Steve, and Norm whom pretend to be "experts" in real life ;-) )
and the acted relationship is just a backdrop to help you relate to them
and your own home improvement situtation.
Dave.
|
4.658 | | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, DECnet/OSI | Tue Apr 06 1993 15:43 | 11 |
| > "don't do any of the work?" Can you explain?
In the episode where they built that office building,
and in another episode, they showed the people who
really do the work. The only work Dean & co-host appear
to actually perform is in the scenes you can actually see
them doing something on screen.
My show preference used to be TOH, HT, then HA (w/Villa).
HA (even though its filled mostly with commercials) has
now moved up to 2nd place on my list pushing HT to 3rd :-)
|
4.659 | better than all of them. | WRKSYS::CARLSON | Dave Carlson | Wed Apr 07 1993 15:39 | 15 |
| For anyone that has cable and gets TNN (Nashville), I caught part of
a show Saturday morning hosted by an older contractor (probably
mid-late 50's) and his helper who was about 25-30. It wasn't
commercialized to the hilt. They were putting down marble tiles in a
bathroom and that's what they did. They explained what they were doing.
They didn't visit the quarry, they didn't visit the tile store.
Best of all I learned something. When setting up for the center of the
floor he sprayed a clear laquer over the snapped line so it wouldn't
get rubbed off. Nice idea.
I'll have to check the name of the show this weekend, unless someone
else knows.
Dave
|
4.660 | Give her back her hammer! | MANTHN::EDD | I'm just a jigger low... | Mon Apr 12 1993 23:50 | 14 |
| re: Hometime
I was watching the local (Boston ch 5) news Sunday night when they cut
to a live shot from L.A. regarding the trial of the police officers.
The female reporter looked familiar, but I couldn't place her. In any
eventshe rambled on and ad libbed in what I thought was the most
amateurish news report I'd ever seen. Laughing, joking, etc.
Joanne Liebeler.
Dunno if she works for WCVB or was just "contracting" for the spot.
Edd
|
4.661 | | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, DECnet/OSI | Tue Apr 13 1993 04:29 | 5 |
| > Joanne Liebeler.
Didn't she say she was leaving Hometime to pursue
a career in stand-up comedy! What is she doing
reporting news?
|
4.662 | | MANTHN::EDD | I'm just a jigger low... | Tue Apr 13 1993 11:55 | 7 |
| Yeah, she did say she was going to do stand-up.
> What is she doing reporting news?
After watching the report, I asked the same question!
Edd
|
4.663 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | A waist is a terrible thing to mind | Tue May 04 1993 11:44 | 12 |
| TOH is looking for a candidate home for their next project. I believe
they want a Victorian that needs a face-lifting. Something in the $70K
range or so.
Contact Channel 2 in Boston for more details.
Lee
P.S. That "other show" mentioned, is that the one with Walter as the
older guy? Can't remember the name of it right now.
|
4.664 | | WRKSYS::CARLSON | Dave Carlson | Wed May 05 1993 12:33 | 9 |
| The show on TNN I think is something like "Remodeling and home
decorating". Not the type of title that sticks with you. It is on
Saturday morning at 10 and at least one other time during the weekend.
Walter is the older fellow and Tony the younger one.
TOH with Steve Thomas "acting" as a knowledgable host is a waste of time.
dc
|
4.64 | This old house | DELNI::EYRING | | Tue Jul 13 1993 17:31 | 37 |
|
My husband and I are in the process of buying a "this old house" in
Watertown, Ma. We have redone a home before, but not one this old (83
years) and not one that needs this kind of work. I have several questions:
1) Does anybody have a general contractor they could refer in the area?
This would be for general work such as moving some walls, replacing a door
with a window, adding a laundry shoot from the 2nd to 1st floor, patching
foundation hole, etc.
2) The house has some leaded glass windows and some are a little bit
broken. I have some experience (as a hobby) in this area, but I'm not sure
I want to take the time to do this myself. Does anybody know someone who
could fix these? I'm considering adding storms to protect them and to keep
from having to address the problem before winter - any comments on that
idea?
2a) Also, can you put storms on the inside? Some of the windows
"kick out" rather than sliding up and down. I can't figure out how
they would open in the summer if there were storms on the outside.
I'd rather not have to take them up and down because the house is
too tall (3 stories,) but if they were on the inside it would be
less of a problem.
3) I'd like to have the woodwork in the whole house stripped (by someone
else!) Do you have that done in place, or send the woodwork out? Sending
it out makes me nervous about getting it but back correctly. Any advice as
to contractors or methods to use or stay away from?
And to answer your question, yes, we are probably crazy. We will find out
how crazy later in the week when we have the inspection done.
Thanks for the help,
Sally
|
4.65 | | NOVA::SWONGER | Rdb Software Quality Engineering | Tue Jul 13 1993 18:03 | 8 |
| > 2a) Also, can you put storms on the inside?
Yes, there are storm windows that mount in the inside. I've seen
articles descrbing some that mount on magnetic strips, and I'm sure
there are others. The difficult part will probably be matching the
style of the interior, given that this house is so old.
Roy
|
4.66 | | STAR::DZIEDZIC | | Tue Jul 13 1993 18:32 | 5 |
| Since you're in Massachusetts, and your house is old enough to
have lead-based paint, you're probably going to get involved in
the state's lead paint removal laws, certified de-leaders, and
etc. Keep that in mind when you think about doing anything with
the woodwork.
|
4.665 | THO Tape? | USCTR1::BJORGENSEN | | Mon Nov 08 1993 01:21 | 16 |
| Hi,
I was wondering if anyone taped TOH on Saturday November 6th 1993 on
ch 2 (Boston) or the November 4th version. Thay had a guy replacing
old windows - well actually re-using the old windows. A really slick
job. For thos not seeing it, he used the old sashes and replaced the
glass with low e therm. glass. It just the process that I want to use
on all of my existing windows. I'd love to get a copy of the tape if
anyone cought it.
-Thanks.
Brian J.
PS> I you have it, Please send mail to USCTR1::BJORGENSEN
|
4.666 | trimming a good deal of the joint off | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | Back to BASICs | Mon Nov 08 1993 09:22 | 8 |
| Given the amount of wood that needed to be taken off the sides of the existing
sash I was wondering about the strength of the sash after is is ripped to
width. They must depend on the glass to provide a fair amount of the stability
for the sash.
They did not cover the seal between the two sashes (not that I recall).
Brian J.
|
4.667 | Did I hear him right? | ASDG::SBILL | | Mon Nov 08 1993 11:00 | 6 |
|
Did I hear the cost right when he said that it was only $175 per window
installed? That's less than most vinyl replacement windows! It sounds
awful low to me...
Steve
|
4.668 | Did anybody check for lead paint? | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Mon Nov 08 1993 11:12 | 11 |
| My first thought, when I saw that show, was, "look at all that
lead paint dust flying around!"
My personal preference for replacing windows, having now done
a couple dozen, is to completely remove sash, trim, and frame and
replace with Andersen DC windows. It gets rid of lead paint
and gets you a good window.
If you aren't worried about lead paint, then other options may be
better.
|
4.669 | y | USCTR1::BJORGENSEN | | Mon Nov 08 1993 11:24 | 14 |
| I'm not concerned about lead paint - I've got only latex. My windows
were in stalled in 1970 and are single pane glass with wooden insert
grills(not sure what you call these) Much like most of todays windows.
I think for < $100 I could go to dbl pane low e glass. They did say
that the cost was $175 per window - much less than the other
alternatives that they were looking into on TOH. (how 'bout the price
of those storm windows!! Eeeek! I nearly puked).
They didn't cover the sash seal - only the sill-seal.
So anyone have a tape of the show?
-Brian
|
4.670 | | NOVA::FEENAN | Jay Feenan - DEC Rdb, Worlds Fastest DB Engine | Mon Nov 08 1993 11:52 | 8 |
| I'm thinking about replacing windows in my house, but want to replace the entire
window for various reasons. A month ago I filled out a form to receive
'free information' from Marvin Windows on replacing windows. I just received
a 15 minute video tape of how to do exactly what you want...which is not
what I want. Don't know the logistics in getting to you but your welcome
to it.
-Jay
|
4.671 | | QUIVER::DESMOND | | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:07 | 7 |
| Re: replacing the whole window
I thought the point of using the same sash,etc. was to maintain the
authenticity of the windows for the period of the house. Cost or lead
paint were not a concern for them. They just wanted it to look right.
John
|
4.672 | | RANGER::PESENTI | And the winner is.... | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:08 | 9 |
| My father-in-law recently replaced all of his windows with technology similar to
the one they demoed on TOH, with one exception, he did not keep his old sashes,
but got new ones made to order with thermal glass, etc. The new windows tilt in
and have all the sealing hardware. I think he paid about $60-75 per window.
When I asked about them at local hardware store, they said (without having
exact measurements) that the average price per window would be about $80-90.
I've got a 10 yr old cape. All the windows have broken seals, and are difficult
to move any time of the year. They are cheapo contractor specials with tracks
made of sheet metal.
|
4.673 | Any new shows? | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | | Mon Aug 01 1994 20:03 | 11 |
| Haven't seen much action in here in a while so...
It may be me, but if I see the English flat or Boston ranch changed into
Versailles show one more time I'm going to heave!
Are any new shows planned? Do we have to wait to see if they install
and electrically heated bottom in a swimming pool? Convert a
Victorian home into a Cape Cod (yours for only $250K plus donations)?
Dan
|
4.674 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Aug 01 1994 20:32 | 6 |
| I saw a show last week where they had a guy custom-form a shower base. The
contractor is asked if this is something he'd recommend to others and his
response was "No, it's not cost-effective"! What a worthless show! The
episode of Hometime which followed was a breath of fresh air.
Steve
|
4.675 | | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Mon Aug 01 1994 22:52 | 11 |
| re: .-1, Steve
>contractor is asked if this is something he'd recommend to others and his
>response was "No, it's not cost-effective"! What a worthless show! The
Well, not entirely worthless. If you had a situation which required that
method as the only possible solution, it would be nice to know that the
option existed. I see a lot of things on these shows that I'll _probably_
never use, but I never know what's up in the future . . .
-Jack
|
4.676 | Ed, you've nailed my head to the chair.... | SMURF::WALTERS | | Tue Aug 02 1994 12:56 | 4 |
|
Check out "Furniture on the Mend" on TLC - two nutty guys teaching
basic and practical furniture repair skills. Fills the hole left by
TOH quite nicely!
|
4.677 | Another vote for "Furniture to Go" | MKOTS3::SCANLON | Another revolutionary falls from grace. | Wed Aug 03 1994 19:18 | 8 |
| I'm not sure if it's still "Furniture on the Mend" or
"Furniture to Go" but these guys are extremely amusing,
use terrible puns, and usually give practical advice on
how to fix the normal niggling furniture problems you find
around the house. I'm not sure when I'll ever need to make
shellac from my old 78's, but it's still worth watching :-)
Mary-Michael
|
4.678 | Joe and Ed ROOL | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | | Tue Aug 09 1994 16:01 | 24 |
| ALLRIGHT! Nice to know I'm not the only one who watches these nuts!
My wife thought I was crazy when I started watching them. Now she
knows for sure.
Its nice to see some new shows (Furniture to Go). Do they "spit coat"
everything? Maybe that's what happened to Joe's hair.
Saw (again) the final episode of TOH in England (where they leave the
place in shambles). Lucky Engalnd has strict gun control laws, as I'm
sure that the homeowners would have wasted Steve and Norm by now!
( Homeowner: Wot do you mean the bloody front has to be angled in! HOW
MANY MORE POUNDS IS IT?!?
Steve: Uh, what are you doing with Norms power nailer?
Homeowner: See hon, I told you if I nailed one foot to the floor he'd
walk in circles!)
Wonderin if they'll ever do a new show (need the laughs)
Dan
|
4.679 | Next Project Underway in South Acton | POWDML::SELIG | | Wed Aug 10 1994 13:02 | 3 |
| There was an article in the Acton Beacon (local paper) that TOH is
doing a major addition to a historic cape in the Soth Acton area. I
beleive the article said the shows would start to air in Sept or Oct.
|
4.680 | This week in Boston | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Thu Oct 06 1994 22:07 | 12 |
| The new season starts tonight on Channel 2.
In the GBA we get about 4 or 6 repeats a week between Channels 2, 44,
and NH 11.
-------
The "Ask the Globe" column the other day answered someone's request for
background on Hometime producer/host Dean Johnson. Seems he conceived
and proposed the show himself. They also gave a brief history of his
cohosts; Joanne, Susan, and Robyn.
Dave.
|
4.681 | | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, PATHWORKS for Win. NT | Thu Oct 06 1994 23:40 | 8 |
| > The new season starts tonight on Channel 2.
>
> In the GBA we get about 4 or 6 repeats a week between Channels 2, 44,
> and NH 11.
What I find interesting is that NH Ch. 11 airs each new show
before the producing station (Ch. 2) does! Ie. TOS airs
at 7:30pm Thursdays on Ch. 11 right before it airs at 8pm on Ch. 2.
|
4.682 | | SEND::PARODI | John H. Parodi DTN 381-1640 | Fri Oct 07 1994 13:15 | 21 |
|
The new project is an addition to, and some renovation of, a 1700s-era
farmhouse. Budget is $150K.
In spite of obvious sill problems (the sills have rotted badly -- in
fact at some point concrete was poured or injected into the holes/gaps
in the sills, and the walls have certainly moved since nothing in the
house is plumb or level), they decided to ignore them and get on with
new construction and renovation.
I don't understand this. Last time I looked, sill replacement cost
between $70 and $100 per foot, so it should cost less that $15K to fix
the problem. They probably decided that fixing the sills would create
other terrible problems with other changes/construction that have been
done over the years (all built to match the out-of-plumb/level
conditions).
Seems like they're caught between a rock and a hard place.
JP
|
4.683 | | CADSYS::RITCHIE | Gotta love log homes | Fri Oct 07 1994 13:22 | 12 |
| It seems like they don't want to get stuck with the situation like the old post
and beam barn they redid, where they ended up razing the building and starting
new from the ground up. In this case, doing the right thing would involve
replacing the sill, but it would also involve re-doing all the walls and floors
which depend on that sill. It could conceivably mean re-doing the whole house.
Given the recent criticisms about spending too much for average people, and the
amount of time the recent projects have taken, they are probably right to do
this.
It will be interesting to watch!
Elaine
|
4.684 | excuse me ?? | ICS::STUART | skis + snow = fun | Fri Oct 07 1994 15:02 | 20 |
|
Did i hear right ?? It cost them $25k to finish the 3rd floor office area !!
By the looks of it all that was done was partitioning, sheetrock and
carpeting. The owner even stated that they didn't spend too much time
trying to get everything straight. Sounds like alot of cash for what
I saw !
Did anyone catch where that house is ?? Kinda looks like a house in Stow.
Why do they spend 20 minutes touring through the house with the owners
and 10 minutes(or less) talking about what people really watch the
show for ???
I'll stick with Hometime and the Home Pro. (which I think has been renamed
to Better Your Home)
Randy
|
4.685 | Oldest house they've tackled | CSLALL::NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Fri Oct 07 1994 15:09 | 7 |
|
FWIW, the home is in Acton.
Check the Lowell Sun (sometime in the past couple of days) for an article
on same.
|
4.686 | Article in the Lowell Sun | RELYON::MONACO | | Fri Oct 07 1994 15:23 | 11 |
| There was an article in last night's Lowell Sun Life Styles
section I think, on this house. It was built in the 1700's
is the oldest house in Acton and the oldest TOH has ever
worked on. Paper said they started with a $150K budget.
The owners submitted their request and it took well over a
year to be accepted. The reason it was accepted was because
TOH had never worked on such an old house befoe. The family
was excited and said one of the bigest problems was the stress
of making a lot of decisions quickly because of the
production schedule.
|
4.687 | | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, PATHWORKS for Win. NT | Fri Oct 07 1994 16:01 | 6 |
| > Did i hear right ?? It cost them $25k to finish the 3rd floor office area !!
You heard right, or close enough (I heard $23.5k). I found the
figure ten times too high also. Either the homeowner meant
$2.3K, or they had to lift the roof off the house to bring in
the building materials :-)
|
4.688 | Rich Patooey there yet? | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Antelope Freeway, One Mile | Fri Oct 07 1994 17:09 | 7 |
| Didn't see the first show (hope to see it as a repeat this weekend),
but i just gotta know-
WHEN ARE THEY GOING TO PUT IN THE RADIANT FLOOR HEATING SYSTEM AND ITS
500+ MILES OF TUBING?:-)
Dan
|
4.689 | They are repairing the sills.... | WLW::TURCOTTE | Thank goodness for every wrong move | Fri Oct 07 1994 17:39 | 7 |
|
It seemed to me that they recommended that the sills were repaired,
and that they plan on doing just that.
Steve T.
|
4.690 | | NOTAPC::PEACOCK | Freedom is not free! | Fri Oct 07 1994 18:20 | 10 |
| Steve,
Are you sure... when they got back together with the homeowner near
the end (after the tour), I thought they said something about "letting
sleeping dogs lie", and then got directly into the addition. There
was discussion about the potential costs of getting the new section to
merge properly with the old section, but I don't remember any
specifics about fixing that sill...
- Tom (memory is the 2nd thing to go... )
|
4.691 | | FREBRD::POEGEL | Garry Poegel | Fri Oct 07 1994 18:37 | 10 |
|
There were going to do NOTHING with the sills. The comment was something
like that it had been 'fixed' that way for many years already and will
probably last many more, and the house has already settled so much and
been fixed (replastered) so much...., so why bother.
They did say $25K for the for the third floor office. I can't believe
it. Maybe they have radiant floor heating up there...
Garry
|
4.692 | | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Fri Oct 07 1994 22:19 | 13 |
| $25K does seem high to me too...but remember, we're talking about
folks who probably called in a general contractor and said
"do it, fast."
$150K for a room down/room up addition seems like a lot to me too,
no matter what they say about how hard it's going to be to attach
it to the old house. It's not *that* hard!
A while ago we completely gutted 3 rooms, a bathroom, and a stairwell
(including the stairs), then rewired, replumbed, insulated, put in
new windows, skimcoat plaster, new stairs, and plank hardwood floors,
all for around $40K, I think. I helped out some, but most of it was
contracted out.
|
4.693 | more chuckles, less content | AIRBAG::SWATKO | | Mon Oct 10 1994 13:31 | 12 |
| In addition to the $25K attic office and "$150K not being a lot to work with
these days", the other thing that cracked me up was Norm's reasoning for
putting the addition on the end of the house instead of putting it out the
back-center of the house. "I like my kitchens bright."
Then at the end of the show, they tell the homeowner that most of the
expense is going to come from marrying the new structure to the old and
making it look right. Sounds like they could have avoided that problem by
putting it in the back. (Not to mention how sticking it on the end will
affect traffic flow.)
-Mike
|
4.694 | 23 k attics, addition positioning | TUXEDO::MOLSON | Margaret Olson | Mon Oct 10 1994 14:31 | 13 |
| The 23K attic renovation may make some sense - particularly if the owners
were counting the builtin countertop and cabinets in that 23K and it
involved rearranging the roof supports. In the storage area they showed
"some of the old beams", and those beams were quite low - almost like the
house had had a trussed roof and a useless attic. They also had to insulate
the roof.
Since they want a new kitchen and family room, why didn't they put the
addition at the back of the house and the new kitchen at the end of
that addition? I'm not following the logic. Not fixing the sills strikes
me as plain old crazy.
Margaret.
|
4.695 | Milk shed on the run! | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Antelope Freeway, One Mile | Mon Oct 10 1994 14:52 | 19 |
| The 25k (or 23K) for the attic makes some sense to me too. As noted
earlier, the storage area off of the attic had beams that came down
through the middle of the room. I imagine that they had to remove
these and provide additional support to the roof frame. On a house
that old I bet nothing is easy.
I too laughed whne they said "150K doesn't go that far". Guess not when
your working with these guys. And Rich Trethewy (?) actually is going
to keep the heater! I think it's time for us all to see his latest
invention - the radiant heat front lawn! Green and toasty all winter!
It was interesting to see the historic site that they went to that
exposed the fireplaces and the mass associated with them. Its no
wonder the houses are small inside - they're all fireplace.
Was funny watching the homeowner keep saying "Is this really worth it"
as they slid the milk shed down the lawn!
Dan
|
4.696 | | WMOIS::ECMO::SANTORO | Greg Santoro | Wed Oct 12 1994 15:30 | 3 |
| 150k seems very high to me. I thought most if not all the materials were
donated. I can't believe it'll cost 150k in labor for what they plan to
do.
|
4.697 | where in acton ?? | GRILLA::LALIBERTE | OMS/Global Communications | Wed Oct 12 1994 18:17 | 1 |
| what street in Acton is this house on ??
|
4.698 | | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Wed Oct 12 1994 18:33 | 6 |
| I think it's at the end of Martin St. (dead end) in South Acton.
If that's correct, the house is not visible from the road. If
you drive down there you end up in somebody else's dooryard and
all you see continuing on is a dirt driveway going off through
the trees. Maybe the house will be visible after the leaves fall
off.
|
4.699 | | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, PATHWORKS for Win. NT | Thu Oct 13 1994 01:57 | 4 |
| > Maybe the house will be visible after the leaves fall off.
.... or after TOH get's through landscaping to the new
kitchen will get plenty of "light" :-)
|
4.700 | Where were they? | REGENT::WOODWARD | I'll put this moment...here | Fri Oct 14 1994 14:49 | 6 |
| Did anyone see last night's show? I didn't get to the TV until it was
over half through. When I turned it on, they were looking at the frame
of a old house that had many fire boxes in the center chimney. Where
was that house? Is it local to MA? Is it open to the public?
Kath
|
4.701 | Minuteman Nat'l Park | TUXEDO::MOLSON | Margaret Olson | Fri Oct 14 1994 14:53 | 6 |
| They were showing just how much space a genuined old fashioned center
chimney takes up. The frame with many fireboxes in such a chimney is
at Minuteman Nat'l park, on 2a in Lexington. The original building
burned down, and the park built the frame and roof to protect and
preserve the chimney for public display.
Margaret.
|
4.702 | another fine old mome is desictared by Yuppies | CSLALL::NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Fri Oct 14 1994 15:06 | 9 |
|
The house I grew up in out in Westfield was built in the late 1600's and
had one of those massive chimneys. The base (in the dirt-floor cellar)
was 12' X 13' and had it's own storage areas inside.
The fools that bought the house from my mother a few years back ripped it
out and replaced it with a cement block affair.
so much for authenticity.
|
4.703 | MIMA NHP | GLRMAI::HICKOX | N1KTX | Tue Oct 18 1994 11:58 | 13 |
|
RE. -3? The chimney can be accessed from Route 2A. If coming
from Rt. 128 heading West you will take the road on the right
just about 500 yards past the Hanscom entrance. The Smith House
is right at the corner, followed by the chimney, and then the
Hartwell Tavern. (BTW: I scraped and cleaned most of the bricks
used in the restoration of the Tavern back in 1979, fun job).
You can stop at the Visitor Center on Marrett Road off of 2A
coming from Lexington or at the North Bridge in Concord which
can provide times of tours, maps, etc...
Mark
|
4.704 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | These boys need a house! | Tue Oct 18 1994 13:09 | 15 |
| Had to laugh at the latest show where Steve is shown standing inside
the "marking lines" sprayed on by Norm. The camera shot is from
upstairs on the existing house. He says "as you can see from the
lines, the addition is big, but not huge" Not huge?!? THe model that
they made shows the addition to be almost as big as the existing house.
Hate to see what a "huge" addition is.
Interesting note about the water/sewer situation in Mass. Are all
areas (towns) like this - no sewer, all septic, with wells. Never
having lived there (currently live in Atlanta) I don't know if this is
the exception rather than the rule.
Dan
|
4.705 | | 2398::BECK | Paul Beck | Tue Oct 18 1994 14:26 | 11 |
| > Interesting note about the water/sewer situation in Mass. Are all
> areas (towns) like this - no sewer, all septic, with wells.
Depends where you live. My town (Carlisle) has no town water or
sewer services, so you have your own well and septic. Obviously,
larger towns tend to provide these services.
There's a big difference between living in a small town outside of
the megalopolis of Boston, and a city like Atlanta. (I'm getting a
picture of someone in a fifth-floor apartment drilling for a well,
and hitting water in the bathtub of the third-floor apartment...)
|
4.706 | private septic, private well | TUXEDO::MOLSON | Margaret Olson | Tue Oct 18 1994 14:55 | 7 |
| The two factors that drive public water and sewage (and lack thereof)
are population density and local geography. If density is low, the
cost of public water and sewer can be prohibitive. Much of the
topography in this area is ledge, esker, ledge, esker. (Flat ledges
frequently have wetland sitting on top of them). It makes far more
sense to build septic on the extremely well drained esker, than it
does to blast through ledge to put pipes under an older road.
|
4.707 | depends on what you're used to :-) | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | I'm still not ready | Tue Oct 18 1994 15:35 | 7 |
| Growing up in Quincy, MA, (suburb of Boston - but not considered part of
Boston) when I thought of someone that had their own well or septic system
I used to think "boy they must be really out in the woods". Now that I live
in Merrimack, NH I have changed my way of thinking (town water, private
septic).
bjm
|
4.708 | Another budget buster? | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Testudo is still grounded! | Tue Jan 31 1995 12:52 | 12 |
| Well, they finished the "Pumpkin" house. The last show made no mention
of the budget, and whether or not they stayed within it. Given the
history of TOH I doubt it. Now they are off to Napa Valley. Oh boy,
another low rent district.
The latest house turned out okay, the floors looked real nice (but at $18 -
$20/sq. ft. they better!). Think Norm could come and build me a new
front door casing? Looks like the homeowners still have work to do.
Any NE folks driven by this house after it was done?
Dan
|
4.709 | | WLW::TURCOTTE | Thank goodness for every wrong move | Tue Jan 31 1995 13:07 | 13 |
|
Haven't yet seen the last show, it airs Thursday night here in
Cinci, the Budgets are really a joke tho' on TOH, as so much of the
labor and materials are donated, in return for the exposure and the
15 seconds Steve talks to the associated contractor.
These homeowners were very active in the hands on work performed on
the house, and I'm sure that their "sweat-equity" saved them money.
Anyways I'm sure whatever budget they mentioned on day one was
exceeeded.
Turk
|
4.710 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Jan 31 1995 13:11 | 1 |
| Didn't the Napa Valley have major floods recently?
|
4.711 | | CMEM3::GOODWIN | Paul Goodwin (dtn)223-6581 | Tue Jan 31 1995 13:35 | 10 |
|
They talked about the budget on the next to last show and they
exceeded it. There was also a considerable ammount of donations
recieved that the owner mentioned that he has a tax liability on.
The house is at the end of a dead end road and there are Private
Property signs up so I didn't venture past them. You can see the
end of the old house and that is about it.
Paul
|
4.712 | | FREBRD::POEGEL | Garry Poegel | Tue Jan 31 1995 13:43 | 8 |
|
On the next to last show they reviewed the budget. It started at
$150,000 but went to $190,000 *AND* they also got $120,000 in donations.
That's an expensive house for what they got but after the homeowner spent
$25,000 just for the atic office, I guess we should expect as much.
Garry
|
4.713 | | CMEM3::GOODWIN | Paul Goodwin (dtn)223-6581 | Tue Jan 31 1995 14:06 | 15 |
|
It's not expensive for what they got. In fact they got a bargain.
When you consider that they built the equivilant as the typical
4 beedroom house (complete with kitchen and baths), Renovated an
existing structure where there were some major problems that could
only be found after opening up walls, as well as de-leading the site
(a couple of the children had elevated lead counts) and new windows
and siding.
Figuring that the renovations to the existing structure ate up 2/3
of their original budget they built a 4-bedroom house with the best
materials and custom work for $210K.
Paul
|
4.714 | Is this show reality? | EMMFG::THOMS | | Tue Jan 31 1995 14:27 | 7 |
| Come on, They got a bargain allright! That house leans more than the
leaning tower of Pisa! They should have bulldozed that rotten old house
and re-built. A poorly constructed, hacked up, albeit 1700's house has
limited value, historic or otherwise. I'd like to see TOH tackle a more
reasonable, affordable project that an "average" homeowner would face.
Ross
|
4.715 | | 12363::JP | Telling tales of Parrotheads and Parties | Tue Jan 31 1995 15:09 | 12 |
| >>> I'd like to see TOH tackle a more
>>> reasonable, affordable project that an "average" homeowner would face.
TOH does not to that sort of thing anymore. They are primarily a technology
show, and not a do it yourselfer's show, even though their roots were in the do
it yourself world. Even the spinoff (New Yankee Workshop) only does projects
that use (if not require) around a million dollars in equipment! The "average"
homeowner could barely afford the time and materials to build all the "jigs" and
"templates" that Norm uses in the course of one project.
If you really want the average homeowner kind of project, you should watch
Hometime on PBS, or (dare I say it) Home Again with Bob Vila.
|
4.716 | Bob means Mr Home Improvment at home | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | Disabled Service Button | Tue Jan 31 1995 15:20 | 10 |
| >>If you really want the average homeowner kind of project, you should watch
>>Hometime on PBS, or (dare I say it) Home Again with Bob Vila.
Speaking of Bob V, I was flipping through the channels this weekend (I think it
was this weekend?) when the Home Again show visted Tim Allen's actual home.
Kind of the way Bob V visits "Tool Time". It was a little funny. Tim was
playing the fool while the real contactors were putting an addition onto his
house (living space plus a 3 1/2 car garage).
bjm
|
4.717 | | CMEM3::GOODWIN | Paul Goodwin (dtn)223-6581 | Tue Jan 31 1995 15:33 | 7 |
|
re: .648
There isn't a project that is built on the New Yankee Workshop
that can't be built with under $300 worth of tools.
Paul
|
4.718 | True... | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Tue Jan 31 1995 15:41 | 11 |
|
re: .650
> There isn't a project that is built on the New Yankee Workshop
> that can't be built with under $300 worth of tools.
Right! As long as you don't follow Norm's example (e.g. If you're
skilled with hand planes, you can make do without a jointer... if
you can dowel... you can skip the famous biscuit machine).
- Mac
|
4.719 | | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, UC1 | Tue Jan 31 1995 15:59 | 5 |
| > If you really want the average homeowner kind of project, you should watch
> Hometime on PBS, or (dare I say it) Home Again with Bob Vila.
Hometime (past seasons reruns) can also be seen on TLC, and
Home Again (reruns) on A&E.
|
4.720 | A charade, with Steve as acting head clown! | EMMFG::THOMS | | Tue Jan 31 1995 16:11 | 9 |
| I realize the TOH has turned into a new technology showcase, but they
still want the audience to believe that the projects are normal
renovations. I enjoy the new technology segments, but I'm beginning to
be annoyed with the renovation charade. Has TOH ever completed a
project on budget? At least Bob Vila gives an accounting of costs and
generally is in the ballpark on budget.
Ross
|
4.721 | | 12363::JP | Telling tales of Parrotheads and Parties | Tue Jan 31 1995 16:28 | 20 |
| >>> re: .648
>>>
>>> There isn't a project that is built on the New Yankee Workshop
>>> that can't be built with under $300 worth of tools.
>>>
>>> Paul
True, and I supposed that given enough time (and enough replacement fingers) you
could do them all with a swiss army knife, after all think of all the shaker and
pilgrim furniture he reproduces.
However, Norm does not hint at how to go about translating the specs into basic
projects for people who don't have multi acre working space filled with more
tools than a Chrysler plant. Of course, I 've always suspected that if Norm
were ever to come down to the tool level of the average person, his tables might
list to the left a bit.
By the way... whatever happened to that other show from colonial Williamsburg?
I think it was the "Woodwright's Shop" or something similar?
|
4.722 | Still on PBS | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Testudo is still grounded! | Tue Jan 31 1995 19:10 | 6 |
| Last I checked the "Woodwrights Shop" was still on PBS. They only did
an episode or two from Williamsburg. Most of the work takes place at
the shop of the person (Tom Underhill?) doing the work. Sort of a Norm
of the 19th century (can you see Norm using a foot/string powered lathe?)
Dan
|
4.723 | varies with locality | DAVE::MITTON | Windows in '95 | Tue Jan 31 1995 21:25 | 9 |
| - ummm I haven't seen new "Woodwrights Shop" episodes on WGBH in ages.
- Can someone tell me the current schedule for Vila's Home Again in
the greater Boston area. It's always been hard to track and often
displaced by sporting events without a reschedule notice in TV Guide.
And I don't get cable. I wish the channel that airs it would do a
better publicity job.
Dave.
|
4.724 | | 12363::JP | Telling tales of Parrotheads and Parties | Wed Feb 01 1995 10:39 | 3 |
| I usually catch it on A&E on Sunday mornings. They have a couple or so episodes
back to back. I think it's late AM, but I'm not sure exactly when. I usually
pick it up during channel surfing.
|
4.725 | Sundays, 8-9AM | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Wed Feb 01 1995 11:33 | 8 |
|
Home Again is on A&E at 8AM and 8:30AM on Sundays. They're currently
reshowing the episodes where they watched a total rework of a zillion
dollar house on the beach in CA. Bob/crew had little to nothing to do
with this house... just kind of watched.
- Mac
|
4.726 | no cable | DAVE::MITTON | Windows in '95 | Fri Feb 03 1995 20:56 | 6 |
| Buried in my paragraph "I don't get cable" ...so I cannot see A&E.
It used to be on a regular VHF channel (4 or 5?) in Boston at 12noon on
Saturdays, but that slot would often get bumped.
Dave.
|
4.727 | Napa Valley? Steve's low on wine, maybe? | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Testudo is still grounded! | Tue Feb 07 1995 14:41 | 14 |
| Napa Valley? I guess there were no candidates worthy of consideration
closer to Boston. Any thoughts of making a contribution to PBS were
put on hold when I saw Stevo and Normy driving around in a Lincoln
Continental. And does Steve always say "100K doesn't go very far"? Or
does he just mean "With TOH on the job your going to lose your shirt!"
TOH is getting to be just a "Gee-whiz, look at how the rich folks
re-model" show. Hometime is not too far behind (Who buys those
vacation homes they build, anyway?).
Can't believe that WGBH isn't going to hear from their viewers on this
one.
Dan
|
4.728 | A Ford donation ? | BIRDIE::JGREEN | Living beyond my emotional means | Wed Feb 08 1995 11:58 | 16 |
|
re 1974.660
} Any thoughts of making a contribution to PBS were
} put on hold when I saw Stevo and Normy driving around in a Lincoln
} Continental.
Steve typically has an F-150 of a different color for many of the projects.
The credits at the end of the show list Ford as a major sponsor. I
always assumed that the trucks were 'donated', I would suspect that
the Lincoln is as well , Ford being the parent company of
Lincoln-Mercury.
~jeff
|
4.729 | | 12363::JP | Telling tales of Parrotheads and Parties | Thu Feb 09 1995 10:13 | 11 |
| re 1974.660
} Any thoughts of making a contribution to PBS were
} put on hold when I saw Stevo and Normy driving around in a Lincoln
} Continental.
Or it could be a rental. If you are looking for a car that can hold as many
people as possible (the camera person and gear probably rode in the back until
it was time for the drive by scenes), most rental agencies will point you at a
landyacht. Or it could be a loaner from the local PBS station. It may just be
the most cost effective, least expensive alternative.
|
4.730 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Testudo is still grounded! | Thu Feb 09 1995 14:09 | 10 |
| re. last few - Yes, I know Steve drives a Ford, and that it was (is?)
donated by Ford, and that the Lincoln is probably "donated" or rented.
Driving a Lincoln around Napa Valley just re-affirms my belief that
TO(E)H is really out of touch with the weekend/weeknight house
fixer-upper warrior.
Was that Rich Trethuie(sp) in the vineyards suggesting that radiant
dirt heat would ripen grapes quicker?:-)
Dan
|
4.731 | | ANGST::BECK | Paul Beck | Thu Feb 09 1995 14:24 | 8 |
| I was in line at the transfer station behind Norm a couple of weeks
ago (he lives in my town), and if memory serves he was driving your
typical sports utility vehicle (don't recall which; might have been
as large as a Suburban, but I suspect it was a Blazer or Bronco (not
white) or something along those lines. Of course, that says nothing
about what else may be sitting in his driveway.
I resisted any urge to have him autograph my garbage...
|
4.732 | | CMEM3::GOODWIN | Paul Goodwin (dtn)223-6581 | Thu Feb 09 1995 19:21 | 9 |
|
RE: .663
I haven't seen the show yet but one of the things that grape
grower look for is soil with dark pebbles to absorb heat from
the sun to extend the growing season. So his analogy would be
accurate.
Paul
|
4.733 | | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, UC1 | Sat Feb 11 1995 18:43 | 5 |
| > I was in line at the transfer station behind Norm a couple of weeks
> ago (he lives in my town), ....
You live in NH, right Paul? And Norm's [secret] workshop is then
in a different town (and State, ie. VT) than his home?
|
4.734 | | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, UC1 | Sat Feb 11 1995 18:46 | 5 |
| Well the did it again. They asked the Napa Valley home owner
what his buget was. He said $100K, and Steve replies that
that doesn't go far back East, never mind in Napa Valley ....
agagagagagagaga
|
4.735 | | SMURF::MSCANLON | oh-oh. It go. It gone. Bye-bye. | Sun Feb 12 1995 17:28 | 12 |
| re: .667
We cringed at that too. For $100,000 I could buy another
whole house! Steve makes it sound like they'll be lucky to
get two loaves of bread out of it.
I found the whole tone of the show to be rather gloomy,
ie everything is falling apart and it will take a fortune to
fix it. It's an old house! What did they expect? If it
was in perfect shape, why would the guy want to fix it up?
Mary-Michael
|
4.736 | Isn't TNYW on Russ Morash's property? | ANGST::wolf.ljo.dec.com::BECK | Paul Beck, TSEG (ANGST::BECK) | Sun Feb 12 1995 21:07 | 11 |
| > You live in NH, right Paul? And Norm's [secret] workshop is then
> in a different town (and State, ie. VT) than his home?
I live in MA.
As I understand it, Norm's workshop (the one they tape the shows in) is in fact
on the property of the show's producer, Russ Morash, also in MA (but not in my
town). I didn't think it was particularly secret. Norm does have his own
workshop on his property, because I recall reading a bit in the local paper
(Appeals Board listings) when he had to get around some lot line restriction or
something to put it up.
|
4.737 | Your PBS dollars at work! | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Mon Feb 13 1995 11:28 | 17 |
| Norm lives in a town in central Mass that is also home to a large
computer company's new chip plant. ;-)
And yes, I've also heard that the NY workshop is actually built on
Russ Morash's property. He probably leases to NYW and then gets to
use it as his own when Norm's not around. Not a bad way to get
your self the ultimate work shop and have someone else pay for it
too!
I also heard that one of the Victory Gardens is also located on
their property and presumably maintained by funds from the show.
Still not a bad deal... let them build and maintain the gardens
and you get to enjoy them while looking out the windows of your
work shop.
Any one want to bet what kind of heating system they have in the
New Yankee work shop? ;-)
|
4.738 | It wasn't a fruedian slip, either! | HYDRA::WHITMORE | | Mon Feb 13 1995 11:48 | 9 |
| But did you notice the wording Steve used?
Not 'what's your budget?'
It was 'How much money do you have?'
Watch out, Dennis!!!!
-dana
|
4.739 | | MOLAR::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dogface) | Mon Feb 13 1995 13:16 | 11 |
| > I found the whole tone of the show to be rather gloomy,
> ie everything is falling apart and it will take a fortune to
> fix it.
Actually, this brought to mind one of the most memorable scenes ever
from the series - The very first Old House back in 1978 when Bob Vila
was walking around the place with the appraiser/inspector who only
seemed to have one line in his repertoire -
"No, that's all shot. That'll have to go. All shot."
|
4.740 | shop belongs to Morash | DANGER::DORMITZER | Paul Dormitzer | Mon Feb 13 1995 13:29 | 7 |
| Yes, the New Yankee Workshop is on Russel Morash's property, as is
the Victory Garden. The "finishing room" for NYW is also the
"potting shed" for VG. I think the kitchen for one or another
of the cooking shows is Morash's as well, but I don't remember
where I heard that.
Paul
|
4.741 | Not Hudson anymore | CNTROL::KING | | Mon Feb 13 1995 13:41 | 2 |
| Norm did used to live in Hudson, but I am pretty sure he built a new
house in Bolton.
|
4.742 | Is it Bolton or Notlob? | ANGST::BECK | Paul Beck | Mon Feb 13 1995 14:32 | 4 |
| re .674
Maybe he's got a whole spate of new houses; he'd better have one in
Carlisle or else stop using our transfer station.
|
4.743 | | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Mon Feb 13 1995 15:15 | 11 |
| Re: Bolton, Hudson, Carlisle, or Notlob...
Norm did live in Hudson a few years back... he could very well
have upgraded his digs in the recent years, I'm not sure at this
point.
The little cooking segment on the Victory Garden is done by Marion
Morash (Russ's wife) and shot in their kitchen.
Keep sending in those PBS donations, I heard they're planning a
new show called "This Old Yacht". ;-)
|
4.744 | Carlisle. | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Mon Feb 13 1995 15:45 | 6 |
|
Norm lives in Carlisle, according to the woman from Standard Electric
who does "lighting design consulting" on their projects. She did Norm's
his house.
- Mac
|
4.745 | Wine | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, That Group | Fri Mar 03 1995 12:55 | 3 |
| So how much time have they wasted touring wineries so far??!!!!
Steve said the last visit to the project will be tapped March 15th ...
|
4.746 | | RT128::KENAH | Do we have any peanut butter? | Fri Mar 03 1995 13:05 | 15 |
| >
> So how much time have they wasted touring wineries so far??!!!!
>
I suspect that at least part of this is a result of the weather --
Television equipment really isn't designed to be used in the rain.
>
> Steve said the last visit to the project will be taped March 15th ...
>
True, but the episode shown last night in Boston was taped in January.
There are seven or eight episodes still to show.
andrew
|
4.747 | | WLW::TURCOTTE | Light Mockery | Fri Mar 03 1995 14:07 | 20 |
|
So far this series has been a big disappointment, even considering the
normal drawbacks of the show (the outa-my-league price ranges) I've
always enjoyed seeing the work done, and the technology.
This show has been devoted to how to grow grapes and make wine, and
about a 30 second discussing of plumbing, about a 10 min how to make
windows, about 10 min of another grape crusher, a couple of minutes of
Steve's grating personality, and a brief clip of the raising of a
650 lb main beam.
Good points have been the computer program that lets you tour the
house in 3d virtual reality, and maybe the first tour of a wine
facility.
Generally a lot less substance, and too much fluff this time around,
I find myself channel surfing, which I haven't done in a while with
this show.
SteveT.
|
4.748 | | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, That Group | Fri Mar 03 1995 14:16 | 9 |
| >> Steve said the last visit to the project will be taped March 15th ...
> True, but the episode shown last night in Boston was taped in January.
> There are seven or eight episodes still to show.
exactly why I said "taped", not "aired" :-)
but i think you may be wrong about 7 or 8 more episodes. I thought
Steve mentioned something about this being the 4th episode, and
only 4 episodes left (on this project) ...... (?)
|
4.749 | 2nd house of the season is always lousy | TUXEDO::MOLSON | Margaret Olson | Fri Mar 17 1995 18:04 | 5 |
| Maybe it is my imagination, but it seems to me that toh does one "real" house
a year, and then fills in with some sort of fluff. Last year they visited
Hawaii between visits to an expensive remodel. I was sufficiently disgusted
with that little vacation to withhold my donation.
Margaret.
|
4.750 | Too much wine, not enough sawdust! | RT128::KENAH | Do we have any peanut butter? | Fri Mar 24 1995 19:59 | 12 |
| The more I've seen of this boondoggle, the more disappointed I've felt.
Maybe it's friction between the contractor and the guys, maybe it's
union rules, maybe they jsut didn't pre-plan this very well, but they
have shown practically nothing of the actual work -- I mean, putting in
that laminated beam should have been a highlight of one episode, but it
was only shown after the fact.
Maybe if enough of us write in, we can convince them to return to
restoration instead of "gut to the walls (and maybe replace a few of
them) and build with all new materials."
andrew
|
4.751 | friction, my eye | SMURF::WALTERS | | Fri Mar 24 1995 20:02 | 7 |
|
>Maybe it's friction between the contractor and the guys.
Some of those friction scenes look like they've been rehearsed.
Badly.
|
4.752 | re .682 by TUXEDO::MOLSON | 12363::JP | Telling tales of Parrotheads and Parties | Mon Mar 27 1995 12:10 | 6 |
| >>> I was sufficiently disgusted with that little vacation to withhold my
>>> donation.
FWIW your protest will be much more effective if you send a donation to PBS with
explicit instructions that NONE of it is to be used to finance TOH, and an
explanation of why you feel this way.
|
4.753 | These old boozers | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Creative Pretzel Eaters Club | Tue Mar 28 1995 13:08 | 12 |
| Was there a winery that they didn't visit during the taping? I also
noticed when asked about the bills on the project, Steve replied "Don't
look at me, we don't do no steenkin bills." This attempt at humor
failed badly, and unless I missed it, I don't believe that they
reviewed the final expenses.
The house ended up looking good, but I have to agree with the previous
noters - not much time was spent in showing the actual construction.
Why can't they just take on a smaller project - like my basement?:-)
Dan
|
4.754 | | TEKVAX::KOPEC | we're gonna need another Timmy! | Wed Mar 29 1995 13:41 | 7 |
| I'd like to have them finish replacing the siding on my house...
Sometimes I think the contractor I hired to do the first quarter of the
job did work for TOH, though.. ($$$).. so I'm doing the rest of it
"with a personal touch"..
...tom
|
4.755 | | XELENT::MUTH | I drank WHAT? - Socrates | Tue Apr 04 1995 14:33 | 6 |
|
TLC has recently began showing older TOH episodes (with Bob V.)
repackaged under the name "The Repair Guide" (or something similiar.)
It airs at 6PM weekdays.
Bill
|
4.756 | | RT128::KENAH | Do we have any peanut butter? | Thu Apr 06 1995 15:15 | 14 |
| > TLC has recently began showing older TOH episodes (with Bob V.)
> repackaged under the name "The Repair Guide" (or something similiar.)
> It airs at 6PM weekdays.
Cool!
A few months ago, I got the companion volume for the very first
TOH -- interesting book, very definitely a rehab project rather
than a complete rebuild.
One of the oddest things, though -- in the kitchen, they installed
brand-new laminate counter tops -- in that hideous burnt orange that
nowadays looks SOOOO 70's, and SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO *ugly*!
|
4.757 | | XELENT::MUTH | I drank WHAT? - Socrates | Thu Apr 06 1995 17:33 | 7 |
|
Re: .688
Oops! The show's title is "The Renovation Guide", although during
last nights show, Norm did use the term "this old house".
Bill
|
4.758 | | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Fri Apr 07 1995 00:43 | 15 |
| Gee, it's amazing what goes around, comes around. Read back a
couple of hundrend replies or so to when Bob Villa was canned from
This Old House, all the comments and complaints about him and his
style of renovation.
Everyone was looking forward to a new host and a new slant on the
show. Not what we expected, was it! They should have called the
last segment, This Old Winery. I think we saw more of those than
the damn house!
Now it seems like Ol Bob wasn't too bad after all. I still say
it's the producers (and accountants) that really call the shots,
but... I liked Bob Villa back then and I still do.
Charly
|
4.759 | Magazine of TOH | REGENT::WOODWARD | I'll put this moment...here | Tue May 30 1995 11:52 | 5 |
| This Old House is now a glitzy, color magazine. I picked up a copy
this weekend. It covers DIY stuff, such as building an
outside stone grill area. It also goes into detail about some
of the show's previous projects.
|
4.760 | | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Tue May 30 1995 14:20 | 6 |
|
Milking the show to death...
why not just start over and do "real" houses
with "real" DIY budgets???
|
4.761 | Not that bad a mag. | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Love the poppies in the median | Wed May 31 1995 14:56 | 9 |
| Picked up a copy of the TOH mag. Not that bad, a little more humorous
and self-deprecating(?) than I expected. They really blew the budget
on the California wine country house!
My wife said it reminded her of the Martha Stewart magazine in that
they both seem to be an extension of a particular episode or series of
shows.
Dan
|
4.765 | rambling thoughts on TOH | REGENT::WOODWARD | I'll put this moment...here | Tue Feb 13 1996 17:31 | 27 |
| Well, another season ended with the renovation of the Salem house.
I could only feel sympathy for the wife who was pregnant through the
whole renovation. She had the baby just as they were wrapping up the
project. I can't imagine how she found any time to rest with all that
work going on.
The husband, who is a car salesman, must be doing pretty well for
himself. I don't know how he could have afforded the renovations and
fed the family.
Some items were pretty extravagant, including the custom rug woven in
England and then hand stiched together at the house.
Eventhough they went overboard on some projects, I still enjoyed seeing
Salem and the historic renovations going on in that city.
The latest show is done in Savannah ... where contractors are bringing
townhouses back to their original grandeur.
TOH has its own web page now. It includes an space to write to
them and express your views about the web site, the magazine, and the
show. It also features a spot to ask questions about fixing up your
{old} house---everything from laying tile to fixing leaks. The notes
sound familar to the notes here.
I like TOH, despite its flaws. I like watching the old Bob Vila
reruns on A&E. I like "the red and green show" when I can catch it.
I even like "home improvement." I'm just a home renovation wannabe.
8)
Kath
|
4.766 | | TP011::KENAH | Do we have any peanut butter? | Tue Feb 13 1996 18:02 | 16 |
| >I could only feel sympathy for the wife who was pregnant through the
>whole renovation. She had the baby just as they were wrapping up the
>project. I can't imagine how she found any time to rest with all that
>work going on.
The wife in the Savannah project is also in her third trimester.
>Some items were pretty extravagant, including the custom rug woven in
>England and then hand stiched together at the house.
Clearly this was something they were able to get donated; I doubt it's
something the Guinees ever would have Ddone on their own.
The TOH home page has a BB attached that answers lots of questions; one
topic (asked about in theis conference) covers spray-in foam, and
infra-red cameras.
|
4.767 | | 2155::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Tue Feb 13 1996 18:07 | 12 |
| >> Some items were pretty extravagant, including the custom rug woven in
>> England and then hand stiched together at the house.
> Clearly this was something they were able to get donated; I doubt it's
> something the Guinees ever would have Ddone on their own.
They seem to of gotton lots of donations for this project,
as they even gave the final tallies on the last show for
this project.
Though as the FAQ in the TOH Web says, you still have to pay
gift taxes on the donated items/services so it's not completely
free .....
|
4.768 | Bob's new "show". | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Tue Feb 13 1996 19:43 | 10 |
|
See also:
"Bob Villa Tours Historic American Homes"
It's been showing in two-hour segments on sunday nights on A&E.
Not a "home improvement" show, but fascinating nonetheless ;-)
- Mac
|
4.769 | something i've always wondered | DYPSS1::SCHAFER | Character matters. | Tue Feb 13 1996 20:08 | 3 |
| i've always wondered ... how does TOH select houses to redo? anyone
know? (i saw a few topics in this chain, but more were relatively
oblique.)
|
4.770 | | 2155::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Tue Feb 13 1996 20:34 | 6 |
| > i've always wondered ... how does TOH select houses to redo? anyone
> know? (i saw a few topics in this chain, but more were relatively
> oblique.)
Also answered in the FAQ (ala "Frequently Asked Questions") portion
of the TOH Web page(s) ....
|
4.771 | | DYPSS1::SCHAFER | Character matters. | Tue Feb 13 1996 20:46 | 3 |
| thanx jeff ... i'll snoop there.
+b
|
4.772 | What was the conclusion to the Salem renovation? | PAMSRC::PAMSRC::BONDE | | Mon Feb 19 1996 15:36 | 12 |
| RE: 4.765
I missed the final installments of the Salem renovation on TOH. Can
anyone tell me--what happened to the proposed carriageway/driveway
entrance to the backyard? The last episode I saw was at the zoning or
planning meeting, where some Salem townfolk objected to the carriageway
because they thought it was a "garage".
I have a sneaking suspicion the proposed carriageway access was denied,
but I'd love to know the final outcome for certain.
Thanks -- Sue
|
4.773 | | LIBRT6::KENAH | Do we have any peanut butter? | Mon Feb 19 1996 15:39 | 4 |
| The Guinee's withdrew their request. Chances are, they'll attempt
the project at a later date, when the glare of cameras doesn't
intrude upon the process.
andrew
|
4.774 | Make that .-2 due to the notes collision :-) | 2155::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Mon Feb 19 1996 15:42 | 8 |
| Re: .-1
The family withdrew their request at the last minute due in
part to running out of both time and money. They may re-apply
in the future however. For now what would be the carriageway
is a family room, but is sheetrocked with firecode stock so
that if they ever do re-apply/get the ok for the carriageway,
they will have some of the work done already.
|
4.775 | | PAMSRC::PAMSRC::BONDE | | Mon Feb 19 1996 15:59 | 13 |
| RE: last two
Ah, thanks--nice to know "the rest of the story"! I'm sure they did
run out of time/money, but I also think it was very prudent of them to
withdraw their request, as it appeared getting the approval was
gearing up to be quite a battle.
Personally, while I think the carriageway would have looked very nice,
and been an incredible convenience for the owners, I would NOT wanted
to be the neighbor who was going to have cars passing within 2 feet of
my bay window...
Sue
|
4.776 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Tue Feb 20 1996 14:58 | 7 |
| re -.1 - The cars passing two feet from the window would be more
acceptable than having them parked there. I though I caught on one of
the earlier episodes a comment that they could, without zoning
approval, cement over the area where the driveway was going to be and
use the area to park their car.
Dan
|
4.777 | New project starts airing Sept. 28th | VAXCPU::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Thu Sep 19 1996 00:10 | 15 |
4.778 | Renovate What? | TNPUBS::WOODWARD | I'll put this moment...here | Tue Oct 29 1996 17:35 | 8 |
4.779 | | CONSLT::MCBRIDE | Idleness, the holiday of fools | Tue Oct 29 1996 18:41 | 4 |
4.780 | | SMURF::PBECK | It takes a Village: you're No. 6 | Tue Oct 29 1996 19:43 | 11 |
4.781 | | VAXCPU::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Tue Oct 29 1996 21:13 | 17
|